Abstract
Bone metastasis of breast cancer cells is a major concern, as it causes increased morbidity and mortality in patients. Bone tissue-derived CXCL12 preferentially recruits breast cancer cells expressing CXCR4 to bone metastatic sites. Thus, understanding how CXCR4 expression is regulated in breast cancer cells could suggest approaches to decrease bone metastasis of breast tumor cells. Here, we show that tumor cell-derived angiopoietin-like protein 2 (ANGPTL2) increases responsiveness of breast cancer cells to CXCL12 by promoting up-regulation of CXCR4 in those cells. In addition, we used a xenograft mouse model established by intracardiac injection of tumor cells to show that ANGPTL2 knockdown in breast cancer cells attenuates tumor cell responsiveness to CXCL12 by decreasing CXCR4 expression in those cells, thereby decreasing bone metastasis. Finally, we found that ANGPTL2 and CXCR4 expression levels within primary tumor tissues from breast cancer patients are positively correlated. We conclude that tumor cell-derived ANGPTL2 may increase bone metastasis by enhancing breast tumor cell responsiveness to CXCL12 signaling through up-regulation of tumor cell CXCR4 expression. These findings may suggest novel therapeutic approaches to treat metastatic breast cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Breast cancer is the most common cancer type in women and bone is the most common first site of metastasis in that cancer1,2,3. About 83% of patients with advanced breast cancer will develop bone metastases during the course of their disease4. The skeletal consequences of metastasis include pain, pathologic fractures, spinal cord and other nerve-compression syndromes and life-threatening hypercalcemia, all of which cause increased morbidity and mortality5. Therefore, it is important to define mechanisms underlying bone metastasis of breast cancer cells.
The ligand of the CXCR4 chemokine receptor is the CXC chemokine stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1), also known as CXCL126. Binding of CXCL12 to CXCR4 activates intracellular signaling associated with chemotaxis and cell survival7 and also functions in tumorigenesis and progression of various cancer subtypes8,9. CXCL12-activated CXCR4 signaling reportedly activates several signaling pathways, such as phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), in various cell lines7 and regulates expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which promote destruction of the extracellular matrix and are critical for metastasis10,11. ERK signaling induces MMP-1312,13, which cleaves collagen type I, which constitutes approximately 95% of bone collagen14. We previously reported that ANGPTL2 increases MMP expression and activity in osteosarcoma cells15. In breast cancer pathology, CXCL12 derived from various tissues, including bone tissue, preferentially recruits cancer cells expressing CXCR4 and promotes their metastasis to those tissues16,17, suggesting that CXCR4 suppression in breast cancer cells might be a strategy to decrease bone metastasis. However, molecular mechanisms underlying CXCR4 expression in tumor cells have not been fully clarified.
Angiopoietin-like proteins (ANGPTLs), which possess an N-terminal coiled-coil domain used for oligomerization and a C-terminal fibrinogen-like domain, are structurally similar to Tie-2 receptor ligands known as angiopoietins18. However, ANGPTLs do not bind to Tie2 or to its homologue Tie1 and thus function differently from angiopoietins18. ANGPTL2 is secreted primarily by adipose tissue in normal conditions19. We recently identified ANGPTL2 as a key mediator of chronic inflammation and associated diseases, such as obesity-related metabolic syndrome19, cardiovascular disease20,21, some autoimmune diseases22,23, carcinogenesis24,25 and tumor metastasis15,26. We also demonstrated that suppression of breast cancer cell-derived ANGPTL2 attenuated breast cancer metastasis to lung tissue in vivo using xenograft models created by implanting MDA-MB231 breast cancer cells into the mouse mammary fat pad26. We also found that serum ANGPTL2 levels in patients with metastatic breast cancer were significantly higher than those in patients with non-metastatic invasive ductal carcinoma27, suggesting that ANGPTL2 promotes breast cancer cell metastasis.
In the present study, we performed RNA sequence analysis of MDA-MB231 cells harboring ANGPTL2 knockdown (MB231/miANGPTL2) and found that, relative to control (MB231/miLacZ) cells, CXCR4 expression significantly decreased, suggesting that ANGPTL2 contributes to CXCR4 expression in breast tumor cells. In vitro experiments revealed that MB231/miANGPTL2 attenuates breast tumor cell responsiveness to CXCL12 stimulation by decreasing CXCR4 expression in those cells. We also found that ETS1-dependent transcription was important for ANGPTL2-induced CXCR4 expression and that ANGPTL2 increased breast tumor cell invasiveness by activating ERK and MMP-13 expression. Using a xenograft mouse model established by intracardiac injection of tumor cells, we found that mice injected with MB231/miANGPTL2 cells showed significantly decreased bone metastasis and prolonged survival relative to controls. Finally, we observed a positive correlation of ANGPTL2 and CXCR4 expression in primary tumor tissues from breast cancer patients. These findings suggest that tumor cell-derived ANGPTL2 may increase bone metastasis by enhancing breast tumor cell responsiveness to CXCL12 signaling through up-regulation of tumor cell CXCR4 expression.
Results
ANGPTL2 suppression in MDA-MB231 cells attenuates CXCL12-activated CXCR4 signaling and expression
Our previous findings in an orthotopic implantation model showed that ANGPTL2 knockdown in breast cancer cells reduces metastasis to distant tissues, such as lung26. To determine what factors downstream of ANGPTL2 might promote metastasis, we compared transcripts in ANGPTL2 knockdown human breast tumor MB231 cells to those in control MB231 cells using an RNA sequencing strategy. To do so, we generated both MB231/miANGPTL2 and control LacZ knockdown (MB231/miLacZ) lines using the Invitrogen BLOCK-iT miR RNAi system15, as previously reported26. We observed twenty transcripts whose expression was markedly altered (10 upregulated and 10 downregulated) in MB231/miAngptl2 compared to control cells (Fig. 1A, Supplementary Fig. S1). Among them, we focused on the chemokine receptor C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4), whose expression was decreased in the MB231/miANGPTL2 line. CXCR4 was of particular interest because breast cancer cells expressing CXCR4 reportedly move to secondary sites in lung, liver, bone marrow or lymph nodes where the CXCR4 ligand, the chemokine CXCL12, is produced in at high levels16,28. In addition, silencing of CXCR4 in breast cancer cells reportedly reduces metastasis in a mouse xenograft model29.
Western blot analysis confirmed that CXCR4 protein levels were significantly lower in MB231/miANGPTL2 compared to MB231/miLacZ cells (Fig. 1B and 1C, Supplementary Fig. S2A and S2B). When we assessed cell surface CXCR4 expression by FACS analysis, we found that MB231/miANGPTL2 cells expressed low CXCR4 levels compared to control MB231/miLacZ cells (Fig. 1D). By contrast, CXCL12 expression in both lines was comparable (Supplementary Fig. S2C).
To compare motility of MB231/miANGPTL2 and MB231/miLacZ cells, we used a trans-well assay in the presence or absence of exogenous CXCL12. In the absence of CXCL12, MB231/miANGPTL2 cells showed lower motility than did control MB231/miLacZ cells (Fig. 1E). In addition, MB231/miANGPTL2 cells treated with CXCL12 showed lower motility than did similarly-treated control cells (Fig. 1F, Supplementary Fig. S3), suggesting that ANGPTL2 loss in these cells decreases their responsiveness to CXCL12, most likely due to downregulation of CXCR4.
ANGPTL2 effects on tumor invasivity are accompanied by CXCL12-dependent ERK1/2 signaling and MMP-13 expression
To determine whether attenuated CXCL12-dependent CXCR4 signaling in ANGPTL2 knockdown MB231 cells alters their invasivity, we compared CXCL12-accelerated, collagenolysis-dependent tumor cell invasivity in MB231/miANGPTL2 versus control MB231/miLacZ cells using wound healing assays on type I collagen-coated plates. In the absence of CXCL12 treatment, MB231/miLacZ cells showed greater invasivity than did MB231/miANGPTL2 cells (Fig. 2A and 2B, Supplementary Fig. S4). In addition, MB231/miLacZ cells treated with CXCL12 also showed greater invasivity than did MB231/miANGPTL2 cells (Fig. 2A and 2B, Supplementary Fig. S4).
Next we used quantitative real-time PCR to compare the effect of CXCL12 on MMP-13 expression in MB231/miANGPTL2 and control MB231/miLacZ cells. In the absence of CXCL12 treatment, MMP-13 expression was lower in MB231/miANGPTL2 compared to MB231/miLacZ cells (Fig. 2C). Treatment of cells with CXCL12 for 8 hours increased MMP-13 expression in MB231/miLacZ controls but not in MB231/miANGPTL2 cells (Fig. 2D). Western blot analysis of CXCL12-treated cells revealed transient ERK1/2 activation in MB231/miLacZ cells but not in MB231/miANGPTL2 cells (Fig. 2E, Supplementary Fig. S5 and S6), suggesting that ERK1/2 activation underlies induction of MMP-13 promoted by CXCL12. To further assess this possibility, we undertook invasion assays of control MB231/miLacZ cells treated with various combinations of CXCL12 or the MKK inhibitor U0126. Quantitative analysis of a given invasion area revealed that the area occupied by invasive MB231/miLacZ cells seen following CXCL12 treatment significantly decreased when the assay was conducted in the presence of U0126 (Fig. 2F and G). These findings suggest that ANGPTL2 knockdown in MDA-MB231 cells antagonizes CXCL12-dependent ERK1/2 activation and reduces MMP-13-induction required for tumor invasive activity.
ANGPTL2 enhances both CXCR4 and ETS1 expression in MDA-MB231 cells
We next examined the molecular basis for enhanced CXCR4 expression by ANGPTL2. The transcription factor ETS1 (for Erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog 1) reportedly regulates CXCR4 expression in tumor cells, as do other transcription factors30,31,32,33,34,35,36. When we examined ETS1 expression by western blotting, we found that it was significantly decreased in MB231/miANGPTL2 compared to control MB231/miLacZ cells (Fig. 3A and 3B, Supplementary Fig. S7A). Next, we asked whether increasing ANGPTL2 expression in MDA-MB231 cells promoted ETS1 expression. To do so, we generated MDA-MB231 cell lines that constitutively express ANGPTL2 (MB231/ANGPTL2) and control lines expressing vector only (MB231/Control) (Supplementary Fig. S7B). Unlike ANGPTL2 knockdown cells, ETS1 expression increased in MB231/ANGPTL2 compared to MB231/Control cells (Fig. 3C and 3D, Supplementary Fig. S7D). Furthermore, CXCR4 mRNA expression significantly increased in MB231/ANGPTL2 compared to MB231/Control cells (Fig. 3E). FACS analysis indicated that MB231/ANGPTL2 cells expressed higher levels of cell surface CXCR4 than did MB231/Control cells (Fig. 3F). In contrast, CXCL12 expression in these lines was comparable (Supplementary Fig. S7C).
Next we examined cell surface CXCR4 expression in MB231/ANGPTL2 cells after ETS1 knockdown using ETS1 siRNA (Fig. 3G and 3H, Supplementary Fig. S8). FACS analysis revealed reduced cell surface CXCR4 expression in ETS1 knockdown versus control cells (Fig. 3I), suggesting a link between ANGPTL2-induced CXCR4 expression and ETS1 expression.
To investigate whether ANGPTL2 increases CXCR4 expression in other breast cancer cells, we generated T47-D lines that constitutively express ANGPTL2 (T47-D/ANGPTL2) and control vector-only lines (T47-D/Control) (Supplementary Fig. S9A). As anticipated, we found that CXCR4 and ETS1 mRNA expression significantly increased in T47-D/ANGPTL2 compared to T47-D/Control cells (Supplementary Fig. S9B and S9C). FACS analysis indicated that T47-D/ANGPTL2 cells expressed higher levels of cell surface CXCR4 than did T47-D/Control cells (Supplementary Fig. S9D). These results suggest that ANGPTL2 may enhance CXCR4 expression in breast cancer cells by increasing ETS1 expression.
Suppression of tumor cell-derived ANGPTL2 decreases bone metastasis in an intracardiac inoculation model
Since breast cancer cells expressing CXCR4 tend to move toward regions of high CXCL12 expression16,28, we asked whether ANGPTL2 knockdown and concomitant decreases in CXCR4 expression would alter the metastatic potential of MDA-MB231 cells. To do so, we established ANGPTL2 knockdown and control cells harboring a luciferase expression vector (MB231/miANGPTL2/luc and MB231/miLacZ/luc, respectively), as we previously reported26. Cellular ANGPTL2 protein levels as well as ANGPTL2 levels in the culture medium were significantly decreased in knockdown compared to control cell lines (Fig. 4A–4C, Supplementary Fig. S10). We observed no differences in proliferation in these lines under normoxia or hypoxia in vitro (Supplementary Fig. S11A). Knockdown and control lines also exhibited no difference in primary tumor size in an orthotopic in vivo implantation model (Supplementary Fig. S11B). To investigate whether tumor cell-derived ANGPTL2 enhances the ability of cells to colonize a metastatic site, we injected MB231/miANGPTL2/luc or MB231/miLacZ/luc cells into the left cardiac ventricle of immunodeficient mice and assessed metastasis. Three weeks after injection of control MB231/miLacZ/luc cells, we detected bone metastasis. However, bone metastasis was detected one week later (at four weeks) in MB231/miANGPTL2/luc-injected mice (Fig. 4D). At 5 weeks after treatment, metastatic activity was greater in MB231/miLacZ- compared to MB231/miANGPTL2/luc-injected mice. When we observed metastatic lesions using H&E staining, we observed significantly decreased bone colonization in MB231/miANGPTL2/luc- compared to MB231/miLacZ/luc-injected mice: the bone-marrow cavity of MB231/miLacZ/luc-injected mice was almost filled with tumor cells by four weeks after injection. (Fig. 4E, Supplementary Fig. S12). Finally, survival of MB231/miANGPTL2-injected mice was prolonged relative to MB231/miLacZ-injected mice (Fig. 4F).
To examine whether CXCR4 knockdown in ANGPTL2-expressing cells decreased bone metastasis, we first established ANGPTL2-overexpressing and control lines each harboring a luciferase expression vector (MB231/ANGPTL2/luc and MB231/Control/luc, respectively). ANGPTL2 protein levels in the culture medium were significantly higher in MB231/ANGPTL2/luc compared to MB231/Control/luc cells (Supplementary Fig. S13A). We then injected both lines into the left cardiac ventricle of immunodeficient mice and assessed metastasis in each group. We detected greater metastatic activity by four weeks after injection of MB231/ANGPTL2/luc compared to MB231/Control/luc cells and survival of MB231/ANGPTL2/Luc-injected mice was shorter relative to MB231/Control-injected mice (Supplementary Fig. S13B and S13C). Next, we established CXCR4 knockdown ANGPTL2-overexpressing and control cells (MB231/ANGPTL2/miCXCR4/luc and MB231/ANGPTL2/miLacZ/luc, respectively). CXCR4 mRNA and cell surface protein expression was significantly decreased in MB231/ANGPTL2/miCXCR4/luc compared to MB231/ANGPTL2/miLacZ/luc cells (Supplementary Fig. S14A and S14B). When we injected MB231/ANGPTL2/miCXCR4/luc or MB231/ANGPTL2/miLacZ/luc cells into the left cardiac ventricle of immunodeficient mice to assess metastasis, we detected less metastatic activity by 3 weeks after injection of MB231/ANGPTL2/miCXCR4/luc-injected compared to MB231/Control-injected mice (Supplementary Fig. S14C and S14D).
ANGPTL2 expression in primary tumor tissues correlates with CXCR4 expression, lymph node metastasis and breast cancer progression
Next, we analyzed a potential relationship between ANGPTL2 and CXCR4 expression in primary tumors from 181 breast cancer patients (Fig. 5A). Patients were divided into two groups based on percentage of ANGPTL2-positive tumor cells at the primary tumor site: the positive group was defined as showing ≥50% ANGPTL2-positive tumor cells, while the negative group showed <50%. This analysis showed that ANGPTL2 expression was positively correlated with high CXCR4 expression in specimens (Fig. 5B). ANGPTL2 expression at the primary tumor site was also significantly correlated with tumor size (T-factor), positivity for lymph node metastasis and severity of breast cancer stage (P < 0.001; Supplementary Table 2). CXCR4 expression at the primary tumor site was correlated only with positivity for lymph node metastasis (P < 0.01; Supplementary Table 3). When we asked whether ANGPTL2 or CXCR4 levels correlated with patient outcome, we found that patients in the ANGPTL2-positive group showed a shortened period of distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) after surgery relative to the negative group (Supplementary Fig. S17A). Patients in the CXCR4-positive and -negative groups showed comparable DRFS periods (Supplementary Fig. S17B). However, patients in the group positive for both ANGPTL2 and CXCR4 showed a shortened DRFS period compared to the other patients group (Fig. 5C). Next, we analyzed the relationship among ANGPTL2, CXCR4 and MMP-13 expression in primary tumors. Both ANGPTL2 and CXCR4 expression levels were positively correlated with high MMP-13 expression in breast cancer patient specimens (Supplementary Fig. S15 and S16). Patients in MMP-13 positive and -negative groups showed comparable DRFS periods (Supplementary Fig. S17C). Overall, these findings suggest that ANGPTL2 may promote breast cancer progression, possibly by activating CXCR4 and MMP-13.
We next examined how ANGPTL2 might induce CXCR4. We previously reported that ANGPTL2 binds to the integrin α5β1 receptor and others have reported that ANGPTL2 binds to leukocyte Ig-like receptor B2 (LILRB2) to promote hematopoietic stem cell expansion37. Thus, we asked whether MDA-MB231 cells express either candidate receptor. Flow cytometry analysis showed that LILRB2 was not expressed in MDA-MB231 cells (Supplementary Fig. S18A), while integrin α5β1 was (Supplementary Fig. S18B). When we asked whether treatment of MDA-MB231 cells with a neutralizing antibody for integrin α5β1 could block CXCR4 induction, we observed partial but significant suppression of CXCR4 induction by that antibody (Supplementary Fig. S18C).
Discussion
Here we demonstrate that breast cancer cell-derived ANGPTL2 may play an important role in metastasis of breast cancer cells to bone. Several lines of evidence suggest this possibility. First, we found that ANGPTL2 enhances both CXCR4 and ETS1 expression, suggesting that these outcomes are linked. Our findings also suggest that ANGPTL2 increases bone metastasis by up-regulating CXCR4 in primary tumor cells, thereby enhancing their responsiveness to bone tissue-secreted CXCL12 (Fig. 6A). Furthermore, in bone tissue, CXCL12-activated CXCR4 signaling promoted by ANGPTL2 accelerated osteolysis and bone engraftment most likely by increasing MMP-13 activity (Fig. 6B). Finally, ANGPTL2 expression was positively correlated with CXCR4 expression levels in primary tumor tissue from breast cancer patients.
CXCL12 signaling through CXCR4 plays important physiological roles, as in hematopoietic stem cell homing to the bone marrow niche38. CXCL12 signaling through CXCR4 also plays critical roles in cancer metastasis. In breast cancer, CXCL12 derived from various tissues recruits breast tumor cells that express CXCR4 by increasing their chemotaxis to regions of high CXCL12 expression, such as lymph nodes, lung, liver and bone tissues16. Thus CXCR4 down-regulation in breast cancer cells could decrease their metastasis. In this study, we showed that ANGPTL2 significantly up-regulated CXCR4 expression in breast cancer cells, which likely enhances their responsiveness to CXCL12. We previously reported that ANGPTL2-expressing breast cancer or osteosarcoma cells metastasized to lung15,26, where CXCL12 expression is high. Therefore, ANGPTL2 activity is likely not limited to bone. However, in this study, bone metastasis by ANGPTL2-expressing cells is often observed in the mouse intracardiac inoculation model. As yet uncharacterized mechanisms that we will address in future studies may govern a preference for bone metastasis.
Molecular mechanisms underlying CXCR4 expression have not been fully clarified, although factors such as HIF1α, NF-κB and TGF-β reportedly regulate CXCR4 expression39. In particular, NF-κB induces CXCR4 expression in tumor cells32 and we observed that cell surface CXCR4 expression in breast cancer cells is partially reduced by treatment with an NF-κB inhibitor (unpublished results). This finding suggests the possibility that NF-κB is also activated by ANGPTL2, a conclusion consistent with our previous report that ANGPTL2 activates NF-κB-dependent pro-inflammatory signaling19,23.
The present study suggests that ETS1-dependent transcriptional regulation is important for ANGPTL2-induced CXCR4 expression. ETS1 activity is also reportedly important for transformation of endothelial cell phenotypes from quiescent to angiogenic40 and for regulation of angiogenesis by pro-angiogenic factors, such as VEGF41, angiotensin II42 or TGF-β43. Therefore, tumor cell-derived ANGPTL2 may up-regulate ETS1-dependent activation of pro-angiogenic genes, promoting tumor angiogenesis. ANGPTL2 also exhibits direct pro-angiogenic activity24. Taken together with these findings, ANGPTL2 likely plays both direct and indirect roles in tumor angiogenesis in the case of breast cancers and these effects may underlie enhanced bone metastasis.
We also found that increased MMP-13 expression seen following CXCL12 treatment was significantly attenuated in ANGPTL2 knockdown cells. Many reports indicate that elevated circulating MMP-13 levels are associated with progression and metastasis of various cancers and specifically correlate with decreased overall patient survival and increased lymph node metastasis in breast cancer44, increased bone metastasis in renal cell carcinoma45 and poor prognosis of non-small cell lung and colorectal cancers46,47. MMP-13 cleaves type I collagen, which constitutes almost all collagen found in bone. In breast cancer pathology, MMP-13-selective inhibitors show effective therapeutic effects against cancer-induced bone osteolysis48,49. Recently, we reported that ANGPTL2 enhances tumor cell invasion by increasing expression of MMP-1, MMP-9 and MMP-13 In osteosarcoma cells15,21. Thus, ANGPTL2 secretion from cancer cells likely contributes to MMP activity in those cells.
In summary, here we show that breast cancer cell-derived ANGPTL2 may play important roles in bone metastasis by enhancing responsiveness of breast cancer cells to bone tissue-secreted CXCL12 through up-regulated tumor cell CXCR4 expression. Furthermore, our findings suggest that in bone tissue, CXCL12-activated CXCR4 signaling in breast cancer cells induced by ANGPTL2 also accelerates osteolysis and bone engraftment. These studies could form the basis of new therapeutic strategies to antagonize bone metastasis of breast cancer cells.
Methods
Cell culture
Human breast adenocarcinoma cell lines MDA-MB231 and T47-D were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Cells were confirmed to be identical to cells registered with ATCC by comparison with the database of the JCRB Cell Bank. MDA-MB231 cells were cultured in Leibovitz's L15 (Wako, Osaka, Japan) medium supplemented with 10% FCS under 100% air without CO2 and T47-D cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Wako) medium supplemented with 10% FCS under 5% CO2/95% air.
Proliferation assay
Proliferation assays were performed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) in normoxia (under 100% air without CO2) and hypoxia (1% O2 without CO2) conditions. 100 μl cell suspensions (5 × 104/ml) with 10% FCS medium was added to a 96-well plate and incubated for 6 hour at 37°C. Then, 10 μl CCK-8 reagent was added to each well, cells were incubated 2 hours at 37°C and optical density at 450 nm was measured. Similar assays were performed after 24, 48 and 72 hours. The growth rate was expressed as a value relative to hour 0.
MicroRNAi silencing of ANGPTL2 expression
MDA-MB231 cells were transfected with ANGPTL2-specific small interfering RNA vectors and control vectors26 using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. MicroRNAi constructs were made using the BLOCK-iT Pol II miR RNAi expression vector kit, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). For microRNA synthesis, a single stranded-DNA oligo encoding a pre-miRNA and a strand encoding its complement were designed using the Invitrogen RNAi Designer website: ANGPTL2 (top) 5′-GATCCGGAGCCCTCACTCTCCAGATTCGAAGCTTGGAATCTGGAGAGTGAGGGCTCTTTTTTGGAAG-3′ and ANGPTL2 (bottom) 5′-GCCTCGGGAGTGAGAGGTCTAAGCTTCGAACCTTAGACCTCTCACTCCCGAGAAAAAACCTTCTTAA-3′, CXCR4 (top) 5′-TGCTGTAAACATCACAACTGGACTCGGTTTTGGCCACTGACTGACCGAGTCCATGTGATGTTTA-3′ and CXCR4 (bottom) 5′-CCTGTAAACATCACATGGACTCGGTCAGTCAGTGGCCAAAACCGAGTCCAGTTGTGATGTTTAC-3′. Stable lines were selected in 20 μg/ml Blasticidin (Invitrogen).
RNA sequencing
Sample libraries established from MB231/miANGPTL2 and MB231/miLacZ cells were prepared using a TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Sequencing runs were performed on an Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx (Illumina). 38 bp reads were mapped to the human genome (hg19 from the UCSC genome browser database) using TopHat v2.0.0.50. Only reads with a Phred quality score ≥ 25 were analyzed. The BEDtools package51 was used to filter rRNA and tRNA, with rRNA and tRNA annotations downloaded from the UCSC table browser.
To evaluate differential expression, expression data was normalized and gene annotations were added using RegionMiner with Genomatix Genome Analyzer (Genomatix, Munich, Germany) software. The Normalized Expression value (NE-value) was based on the following formula:52
To compile NE-value information for an individual gene, mean NE-values were calculated from all gene transcripts, as were log2-transformed fold-changes between MB231/miANGPTL2 and MB231/miLacZ cells. RNA-seq data were deposited in the DDBJ Sequence Read Archive (DRA). Accession number: DRA002859.
Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted from cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Deoxyribonuclease-treated RNA was reverse-transcribed with a PrimerScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara Bio, Otsu, Shiga, Japan). PCR was performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara Bio). Oligonucleotides used for PCR are listed in Supplementary Table 1. PCR products were analyzed with a Thermal Cycler Dice Real Time system (Takara Bio) and relative transcript abundance was normalized to that of RPS18.
Flow cytometry (FACS)
Subconfluent cells were detached using Accutase Solution (Wako) at 37°C. Cells were incubated with rabbit anti-human antibody against PE-CXCR4 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), α5β1 (Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA) and PE-LILRB2 (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) for 30 min at 4°C, washed with PBS and then analyzed by flow FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Subsequent data analysis was done using FlowJo software (Treestar, Ashland, OR, USA).
Transwell migration assay
Assays were performed using a Costar Transwell Permeable Support system with 8.0 μm pore size. In brief, 5 × 104 cells were suspended in 1% FCS media and placed in the upper chamber of a transwell plate without ligand, while the lower chamber contained 1% FCS media plus CXCL12 at a final concentration of 50, 100 or 200 ng/ml (R&D System, Minneapolis, MN, USA). After 18 h incubation at 37°C, cells on the upper surface of the filter were removed by wiping with cotton swab and cells that had migrated to the lower side were fixed with formalin and stained with Giemsa and haematoxylin. Migration was quantified using 6 standardized microscopy fields per membrane.
Invasion assay
MB231/miLacZ and MB231/miANGPTL2 cells were cultured in 96-well plates (ESSEN ImageLock plates) according to the manufacturer's instructions (ESSEN IncuCyte ZOOM) and visualized using a real-time cell imaging system (IncuCyte™ live-cell, ESSEN BioScience, Inc). In brief, plates were coated with a thin layer (50 μl) of collagen-1 (300 μg/ml) (R&D System) and placed in a 37°C incubator with 5% CO2 overnight. Then, 100 μl of the cell suspension (1 × 105 cells/ml) was added to each well, plates were incubated 6 h and a scratch was made in the plate using a 96-pin WoundMaker™. 50 μl of a 5× neutralization solution (DMEM with 1.875% bicarbonate buffer and 25% FBS) plus a working stock of 200 μl of 3.75 mg/ml collagen-I in 20 mM acetic acid were mixed and 100 μl of the mixture was added to each plate for 30 min. Then, 100 μl of culture media was added to each. Images were automatically acquired and registered by the IncuCyte™ software system (ESSEN BioScience). Typical kinetic updates were recorded at 2 h intervals over a 24 h period. CXCL12 (200 ng/ml final concentration, R&D Systems) was added to the neutralization solution with or without 20 μM of the MKK inhibitor U0126 (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).
Immunoblot analysis
Immunoblot analysis was performed as described24. SuperSep Ace gels (5–20%) were from Wako. Antibodies were against ETS1 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), HSC70 (B-6, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), CXCR4 (ab124824, ab2074; Abcam) and ANGPTL2 (R&D Systems). Immunodetection was performed using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) kit (GE Healthcare, Amersham, UK).
CXCL12-stimulated ERK1/2 phosphorylation
Cells were serum-starved overnight and stimulated with 100 ng/ml CXCL12 (R&D Systems) for 5, 10 or 20 min at 37°C. Cells were lysed as in the immunoblot analysis. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies to phospho-ERK1/2 and ERK1/2 were used for immunodetection (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA).
Establishment of ANGPTL2-overexpressing cells
To create stably-transfected lines, MDA-MB231 or T47-D cells were transduced with FLAG-tagged ANGPTL2 expression26 or control vectors using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Transfected lines were selected in 800 μg/ml G418 (Merck KGaA).
ETS1 knockdown
MB231/ANGPTL2 cells were reseeded in 6-well plates with two specific ETS1 siRNAs (SR301470A and SR301470B; ORIGENE, ETS1 (Locus ID 2113) Trilencer-27 Human siRNA) or control Trilencer-27 Universal Scrambled Negative Control (ORIGENE, Rockville, MD, USA). Total protein was extracted for immunoblot analysis and ETS1 protein expression was analyzed after 48 h of incubation. FACS analysis was undertaken after 48 h of incubation.
Establishment of luciferase-expressing cells
For bioluminescence imaging, ANGPTL2-knockdown MDA-MB231 cells were transfected with pGL4.51 (luc/CMV/Neo) vector26. Stable lines were selected in G418 (800 μg/ml). ANGPTL2-overexpressing MDA-MB231 cells were transfected with pGL4.50 (luc/CMV/Hygro) vector15. Stable lines were selected in hygromycin B (200 μg/ml)(Invitrogen).
Quantitation of ANGPTL2 protein by ELISA
MB231/Control/luc, MB231/ANGPTL2/luc, MB231/miLacZ/luc, or MB231/miANGPTL2/luc cells were grown to confluency. The medium was then changed, cells were maintained for another 24 h and medium was collected to quantify ANGPTL2 protein by ELISA using the ANGPTL2 Assay Kit (IBL, Fujioka, Gunma, Japan), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Animal studies
All experiments were performed according to guidelines of Institutional Animal Committee of Kumamoto University. For intracardiac injections, subconfluent tumor cells were harvested, washed in PBS and resuspended at a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/ml. Non obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) Janus kinase 3 knockout (NOJ) mice26 were anesthetized by isoflurane and placed in the supine position. With a 29-gauge needle, 1 × 105 cells were injected into the left ventricle of anesthetized mice after visualization of arterial blood flow into the syringe. Metastasis was monitored by bioluminescence imaging for 5 weeks after injection. D-Luciferin (100 μg/g) was injected into back skin of anesthetized mice before imaging and images were then acquired using a NightOWL II LB 983 System (Berthold Technologies, Bad Wildbad, Germany). Luminescence was calculated using IndiGO2 software. For the orthotopic implantation model, subconfluent tumor cells were harvested, washed in PBS and resuspended at 1 × 107 cells/ml. Female 8–12 week-old NOJ mice were anesthetized by isoflurane and for the breast cancer model, cells (1 × 106) in 100 μl PBS were injected into their mammary fat pads.
Human studies
The study group included 181 specimens of female primary invasive duct breast cancer cases from patients diagnosed between January of 1989 and December of 1996 at Kumamoto University. This study was approved by the Ethics Committees of Kumamoto University. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject.
Immunohistochemical staining
Immunohistochemical analysis was performed as described26. Specimens were incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-human ANGPTL2 (Abcam) or anti-CXCR4 (Abcam) antibodies. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 receptor analysis was performed as described53.
Evaluation of immunostaining
Each patient sample was evaluated by two independent investigators blinded to the clinical pathology parameters. We divided the 181 total samples (including 178 assessed for MMP-13, as 3 were excluded due to sample loss) into two groups, based on the median percentage of ANGPTL2-, CXCR4- or MMP-13-positive invasive cells. ANGPTL2- or MMP-13 positive groups were defined as having ≥50% positive cells; the CXCR4-positive group was defined as having ≥25% positive cells.
Treatment of cells with integrin α5β1 antibody
Parental MDA-MB231 cells were maintained in serum-free Leibovitz's L15 for 24 hours. Then cells were incubated with α5β1 antibody (25 μg/ml) for 24 hours.
Total RNA from cells was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Deoxyribonuclease-treated RNA was reverse-transcribed with a PrimerScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara Bio). PCR was performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara Bio).
Statistics
Analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, CA, USA). The Kaplan-Meier log-rank test was used to analyze mouse survival. Correlations between ANGPTL2, CXCR4 and MMP-13 were tested via Fisher's exact test. Distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) was estimated through the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using the log-rank test.
Change history
13 July 2015
A correction has been published and is appended to both the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has not been fixed in the paper.
References
Hess, K. et al. Metastatic patterns in adenocarcinoma. Cancer 106, 1624–1633 (2006).
Siegel, R., Ma, J., Zou, Z. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64, 9–29 (2014).
Pivot, X. et al. A retrospective study of first indicators of breast cancer recurrence. Oncology 58, 185–190 (2000).
Coleman, R. Skeletal complications of malignancy. Cancer 80, 1588–1594 (1997).
Kozlow, W. & Guise, T. Breast cancer metastasis to bone: mechanisms of osteolysis and implications for therapy. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 10, 169–180 (2005).
Zou, Y., Kottmann, A., Kuroda, M., Taniuchi, I. & Littman, D. Function of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in haematopoiesis and in cerebellar development. Nature 393, 595–599 (1998).
Teicher, B. & Fricker, S. CXCL12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 pathway in cancer. Clin Cancer Res 16, 2927–2931 (2010).
Burger, J. & Kipps, T. CXCR4: a key receptor in the crosstalk between tumor cells and their microenvironment. Blood 107, 1761–1767 (2006).
Zhang, Z. et al. Expression of CXCR4 and breast cancer prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 14, 1471–2407 (2014).
Chinni, S. et al. CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling activates Akt-1 and MMP-9 expression in prostate cancer cells: the role of bone microenvironment-associated CXCL12. Prostate 66, 32–48 (2006).
Son, B. et al. Migration of bone marrow and cord blood mesenchymal stem cells in vitro is regulated by stromal-derived factor-1-CXCR4 and hepatocyte growth factor-c-met axes and involves matrix metalloproteinases. Stem Cells 24, 1254–1264 (2006).
Tan, C. et al. CXCL12/CXCR4 promotes laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma metastasis through MMP-13-dependent invasion via the ERK1/2/AP-1 pathway. Carcinogenesis 29, 1519–1527 (2008).
Yu, T. et al. CXCR4 promotes oral squamous cell carcinoma migration and invasion through inducing expression of MMP-9 and MMP-13 via the ERK signaling pathway. Mol Cancer Res 9, 161–172 (2011).
Viguet-Carrin, S., Garnero, P. & Delmas, P. The role of collagen in bone strength. Osteoporos Int 17, 319–336 (2006).
Odagiri, H. et al. The secreted protein ANGPTL2 promotes metastasis of osteosarcoma cells through integrin α5β1, p38 MAPK and matrix metalloproteinases. Sci Signal 7, 2004612 (2014).
Muller, A. et al. Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis. Nature 410, 50–56 (2001).
Zlotnik, A., Burkhardt, A. & Homey, B. Homeostatic chemokine receptors and organ-specific metastasis. Nat Rev Immunol 11, 597–606 (2011).
Kadomatsu, T., Endo, M., Miyata, K. & Oike, Y. Diverse roles of ANGPTL2 in physiology and pathophysiology. Trends Endocrinol Metab 25, 245–254 (2014).
Tabata, M. et al. Angiopoietin-like protein 2 promotes chronic adipose tissue inflammation and obesity-related systemic insulin resistance. Cell Metab 10, 178–188 (2009).
Horio, E. et al. Role of endothelial cell-derived angptl2 in vascular inflammation leading to endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis progression. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 34, 790–800 (2014).
Tazume, H. et al. Macrophage-derived angiopoietin-like protein 2 accelerates development of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 32, 1400–1409 (2012).
Okada, T. et al. Synoviocyte-derived angiopoietin-like protein 2 contributes to synovial chronic inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Pathol 176, 2309–2319 (2010).
Ogata, A. et al. The role of angiopoietin-like protein 2 in pathogenesis of dermatomyositis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 418, 494–499 (2012).
Aoi, J. et al. Angiopoietin-like protein 2 is an important facilitator of inflammatory carcinogenesis and metastasis. Cancer Res 71, 7502–7512 (2011).
Aoi, J. et al. Angiopoietin-like protein 2 accelerates carcinogenesis by activating chronic inflammation and oxidative stress. Mol Cancer Res 12, 239–249 (2014).
Endo, M. et al. Tumor cell-derived angiopoietin-like protein ANGPTL2 is a critical driver of metastasis. Cancer Res 72, 1784–1794 (2012).
Endo, M. et al. Serum ANGPTL2 levels reflect clinical features of breast cancer patients: implications for the pathogenesis of breast cancer metastasis. Int J Biol Markers 27, 5000080 (2014).
Balkwill, F. Cancer and the chemokine network. Nat Rev Cancer 4, 540–550 (2004).
Ling, X. et al. The CXCR4 antagonist AMD3465 regulates oncogenic signaling and invasiveness in vitro and prevents breast cancer growth and metastasis in vivo. PLoS One 8, 6 (2013).
Staller, P. et al. Chemokine receptor CXCR4 downregulated by von Hippel-Lindau tumour suppressor pVHL. Nature 425, 307–311 (2003).
Lee, B. et al. Carboxyl-terminal Src kinase homologous kinase negatively regulates the chemokine receptor CXCR4 through YY1 and impairs CXCR4/CXCL12 (SDF-1α)-mediated breast cancer cell migration. Cancer Res 65, 2840–2845 (2005).
Kukreja, P., Abdel-Mageed, A., Mondal, D., Liu, K. & Agrawal, K. Up-regulation of CXCR4 expression in PC-3 cells by stromal-derived factor-1α (CXCL12) increases endothelial adhesion and transendothelial migration: role of MEK/ERK signaling pathway-dependent NF-κB activation. Cancer Res 65, 9891–9898 (2005).
Phillips, R. et al. Epidermal growth factor and hypoxia-induced expression of CXC chemokine receptor 4 on non-small cell lung cancer cells is regulated by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/PTEN/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway and activation of hypoxia inducible factor-1α. J Biol Chem 280, 22473–22481 (2005).
Maroni, P., Bendinelli, P., Matteucci, E. & Desiderio, M. HGF induces CXCR4 and CXCL12-mediated tumor invasion through Ets1 and NF-κB. Carcinogenesis 28, 267–279 (2007).
Park, B. et al. An isoform of C/EBPβ, LIP, regulates expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 and modulates breast cancer cell migration. J Biol Chem 288, 28656–28667 (2013).
Singareddy, R. et al. Transcriptional regulation of CXCR4 in prostate cancer: significance of TMPRSS2-ERG fusions. Mol Cancer Res 11, 1349–1361 (2013).
Zhang, C. et al. Angiopoietin-like proteins stimulate ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Med 12, 240–245 (2006).
Lapidot, T. & Kollet, O. The essential roles of the chemokine SDF-1 and its receptor CXCR4 in human stem cell homing and repopulation of transplanted immune-deficient NOD/SCID and NOD/SCID/B2m(null) mice. Leukemia 16, 1992–2003 (2002).
Mukherjee, D. & Zhao, J. The Role of chemokine receptor CXCR4 in breast cancer metastasis. Am J Cancer Res 3, 46–57 (2013).
Wei, G. et al. Ets1 and Ets2 are required for endothelial cell survival during embryonic angiogenesis. Blood 114, 1123–1130 (2009).
Iwasaka, C., Tanaka, K., Abe, M. & Y, S. Ets-1 regulates angiogenesis by inducing the expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and matrix metalloproteinase-1 and the migration of vascular endothelial cells. J Cell Physiol 169, 522–531 (1996).
Zhan, Y. et al. Ets-1 is a critical regulator of Ang II-mediated vascular inflammation and remodeling. J Clin Invest 115, 2508–2516 (2005).
Geisinger, M. et al. Ets-1 is essential for connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2) induction by TGF-β1 in osteoblasts. PLoS One 7, 23 (2012).
Zhang, B. et al. Tumor-derived matrix metalloproteinase-13 (MMP-13) correlates with poor prognoses of invasive breast cancer. BMC Cancer 8, 1471–2407 (2008).
Kominsky, S., Doucet, M., Thorpe, M. & Weber, K. MMP-13 is over-expressed in renal cell carcinoma bone metastasis and is induced by TGF-β1. Clin Exp Metastasis 25, 865–870 (2008).
Hsu, C., Shen, G. & Ko, J. Matrix metalloproteinase-13 expression is associated with bone marrow microinvolvement and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 52, 349–357 (2006).
Leeman, M., McKay, J. & Murray, G. Matrix metalloproteinase 13 activity is associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. J Clin Pathol 55, 758–762 (2002).
Shah, M. et al. An MMP13-selective inhibitor delays primary tumor growth and the onset of tumor-associated osteolytic lesions in experimental models of breast cancer. PLoS One 7, 11 (2012).
Nannuru, K. et al. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-13 regulates mammary tumor-induced osteolysis by activating MMP9 and transforming growth factor-β signaling at the tumor-bone interface. Cancer Res 70, 3494–3504 (2010).
Trapnell, C., Pachter, L. & Salzberg, S. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25, 1105–1111 (2009).
Quinlan, A. & Hall, I. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
Audic, S. & Claverie, J. The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res 7, 986–995 (1997).
Yamamoto, Y. et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α is closely linked to an aggressive phenotype in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 110, 465–475 (2008).
Acknowledgements
We thank Mss. K. Tabu, M. Nakata and N. Shirai for technical assistance. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (25461192), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and the Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) program of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) and by grants from the Takeda Science Foundation and the Kobayashi Foundation for Cancer Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.M., E.M. and O.Y. developed the initial concept. T.M., E.M. and O.Y. designed experiments. T.M., O.H. and T.K. performed experiments and analyzed data. M.S.M. and I.M. performed RNA sequencing. Y.Y. analyzed clinical data. T.M., M.E. and O.Y. co-wrote the manuscript. T.N., H.T., H.I., M.Y., K.M., J.M., H.H., I.M. and K.T. reviewed the manuscript. H.I. and H.M. supervised the study. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Info
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Masuda, T., Endo, M., Yamamoto, Y. et al. ANGPTL2 increases bone metastasis of breast cancer cells through enhancing CXCR4 signaling. Sci Rep 5, 9170 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09170
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09170
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
The Role of Breast Cancer Cells in Bone Metastasis: Suitable Seeds for Nourishing Soil
Current Osteoporosis Reports (2024)
-
Synaptotagmin 11 scaffolds MKK7–JNK signaling process to promote stem-like molecular subtype gastric cancer oncogenesis
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2022)
-
Tumor cell-derived ANGPTL2 promotes β-catenin-driven intestinal tumorigenesis
Oncogene (2022)
-
Hypoxia inducible factor signaling in breast tumors controls spontaneous tumor dissemination in a site-specific manner
Communications Biology (2021)
-
Targeting Histone Modifications in Bone and Lung Metastatic Cancers
Current Osteoporosis Reports (2021)