Abstract
Economic inequality might influence subjective well-being through psychological processes such as status competition and social distance. However, evidence for this claim is mixed. In this Perspective, we suggest that inconsistent findings arise because the psychological effects of economic inequality are driven by perceived — rather than objective — inequality. Perceived inequality is not always related to objective inequality for at least three reasons. First, unequal societies tend to be more physically and psychologically segregated, so, paradoxically, people have less contact with inequality in these societies. Second, people are more influenced by signs of economic disparities in their daily life and close circles than by information about inequality at an abstract level. Third, system-justifying ideologies lead people to perceive more or less inequality relative to objective inequality. We conclude that perceived inequality is crucial for understanding how and when objective inequality influences psychological processes and individual outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E. & Zucman, G. Global inequality dynamics: new findings from WID.world. Am. Econ. Rev. 107, 404–409 (2017).
OXFAM International. Time to care: unpaid and underpaid care work and the global inequality crisis. Oxfam https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/620928/bp-time-to-care-inequality-200120-en.pdf (2020).
García-Sánchez, E. et al. Perceptions of economic inequality in Colombian daily life: more than unequal distribution of economic resources. Front. Psychol. 9, 1660 (2018).
Peterson, E. W. F. Is economic inequality really a problem? A review of the arguments. Soc. Sci. 6, 147 (2017).
Kamalvanshi, V. & Kushwaha, S. in Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (ed. Leal Filho, W.) 1–12 (Springer, 2021).
Pickett, K. E. & Wilkinson, R. G. Inequality: an underacknowledged source of mental illness and distress. Br. J. Psychiat. 197, 426–428 (2010).
Pickett, K. E. & Wilkinson, R. G. Income inequality and health: a causal review. Soc. Sci. Med. 128, 316–326 (2015).
Messias, E., Eaton, W. W. & Grooms, A. N. Economic grand rounds: income inequality and depression prevalence across the United States: an ecological study. Psychiat. Serv. 62, 710–712 (2011).
Burns, J. K., Tomita, A. & Kapadia, A. S. Income inequality and schizophrenia: increased schizophrenia incidence in countries with high levels of income inequality. Int. J. Soc. Psychiat. 60, 185–196 (2014).
Babones, S. J. Income inequality and population health: correlation and causality. Soc. Sci. Med. 66, 1614–1626 (2008).
De Vogli, R., Mistry, R., Gnesolto, R. & Cornia, G. A. Has the relation between income inequality and life expectancy disappeared? Evidence from Italy and top industrialised countries. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59, 158–162 (2005).
Wilkinson, R. G. & Pickett, K. E. Income inequality and socioeconomic gradients in mortality. Am. J. Public Health 98, 699–704 (2008).
Wilkinson, R. G. & Pickett, K. E. Income inequality and social dysfunction. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 35, 493–511 (2009).
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E. & Oishi, S. Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being. Coll. Psychol. 4, 15 (2018).
O’Connell, M. Fairly satisfied: economic equality, wealth and satisfaction. J. Econ. Psychol. 25, 297–305 (2004).
Verme, P. Life satisfaction and income inequality. Rev. Income Wealth 57, 111–127 (2011).
Alesina, A., di Tella, R. & MacCulloch, R. Inequality and happiness: are Europeans and Americans different? J. Public Econ. 88, 2009–2042 (2004).
Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A. & Fitoussi, J. P. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Europa https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/8131721/8131772/Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi-Commission-report.pdf (2009).
Buttrick, N. R. & Oishi, S. The psychological consequences of income inequality. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 11, e12304 (2017).
Buttrick, N. R., Heintzelman, S. J. & Oishi, S. Inequality and well-being. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 18, 15–20 (2017).
Rodríguez-Bailón, R., Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á., García-Sánchez, E., Petkanopoulou, K. & Willis, G. B. Inequality is in the air: contextual psychosocial effects of power and social class. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 33, 120–125 (2020).
Wilkinson, R. G. & Pickett, K. E. The enemy between us: the psychological and social costs of inequality. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 47, 11–24 (2017).
De Botton, A. Status Anxiety (Penguin, 2008).
Kraus, M. W., Tan, J. J. X. & Tannenbaum, M. B. The social ladder: a rank-based perspective on social class. Psychol. Inq. 24, 81–96 (2013).
Peters, K. et al. The language of inequality: evidence economic inequality increases wealth category salience. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211036627 (2021).
Jetten, J. et al. A social identity analysis of responses to economic inequality. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 18, 1–5 (2017).
Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B. P., Lochner, K. & Prothrow-Stith, D. Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. Am. J. Public Health 87, 1491–1498 (1997).
Uslaner, E. M. & Brown, M. Inequality, trust, and civic engagement. Am. Politics Res. 33, 868–894 (2005).
Lancee, B. & Van de Werfhorst, H. G. Income inequality and participation: a comparison of 24 European countries. Soc. Sci. Res. 41, 1166–1178 (2012).
Kelley, J. & Evans, M. D. R. The new income inequality and well-being paradigm: inequality has no effect on happiness in rich nations and normal times, varied effects in extraordinary circumstances, increases happiness in poor nations, and interacts with individuals’ perceptions, attitudes, politics, and expectations for the future. Soc. Sci. Res. 62, 39–74 (2017).
Paskov, M., Gerxhani, K. & Van De Werfhorst, H. G. Giving up on the Joneses? The relationship between income inequality and status-seeking. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 33, 112–123 (2017).
Kim, Y., Sommet, N., Na, J. & Spini, D. Social class — not income inequality — predicts social and institutional trust. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 13, 186–198 (2022).
Subramanian, S. V. & Kawachi, I. Income inequality and health: what have we learned so far? Epidemiol. Rev. 26, 78–91 (2004).
Wilkinson, R. & Pickett, K. The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better (Allen Lane, 2009).
Alesina, A. & La Ferrara, E. Participation in heterogeneous communities. Q. J. Econ. 115, 847–904 (2000).
Fischer, J. A. V. & Torgler, B. Do positional concerns destroy social capital: evidence from 26 countries. Econ. Inq. 51, 1542–1565 (2013).
Sommet, N., Elliot, A. J., Jamieson, J. P. & Butera, F. Income inequality, perceived competitiveness, and approach-avoidance motivation. J. Personal. 87, 767–784 (2019).
Cheung, F. & Lucas, R. E. Income inequality is associated with stronger social comparison effects: the effect of relative income on life satisfaction. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 110, 332–341 (2016).
Delhey, J., Schneickert, C. & Steckermeier, L. C. Sociocultural inequalities and status anxiety: redirecting the Spirit Level Theory. Int. J. Comp. Sociol. 58, 215–240 (2017).
Loughnan, S. et al. Economic inequality is linked to biased self-perception. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1254–1258 (2011).
Layte, R. & Whelan, C. T. Who feels inferior? A test of the status anxiety hypothesis of social inequalities in health. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 30, 525–535 (2014).
Charles, M. & Lundy, J. D. The local Joneses: household consumption and income inequality in large metropolitan areas. Res. Soc. Stratif. Mobil. 34, 14–29 (2013).
Roychowdhury, P. Visible inequality, status competition, and conspicuous consumption: evidence from rural India. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 69, 36–54 (2017).
Walasek, L. & Brown, G. D. A. Income inequality, income, and internet searches for status goods: a cross-national study of the association between inequality and well-being. Soc. Indic. Res. 129, 1001–1014 (2016).
Walasek, L., Bhatia, S. & Brown, G. D. A. Positional goods and the social rank hypothesis: income inequality affects online chatter about high- and low-status brands on Twitter. J. Consum. Psychol. 28, 138–148 (2018).
Bai, C., Gong, Y. & Feng, C. Social trust, pattern of difference, and subjective well-being. SAGE Open 9, 1–17 (2019).
Elgar, F. J. et al. Social capital, health and life satisfaction in 50 countries. Health Place 17, 1044–1053 (2011).
Kuroki, M. Does social trust increase individual happiness in Japan? Jpn Econ. Rev. 62, 444–459 (2011).
Delhey, J. & Dragolov, G. Why inequality makes Europeans less happy: the role of distrust, status anxiety, and perceived conflict. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 30, 151–165 (2014).
Oishi, S., Kesebir, S. & Diener, E. Income inequality and happiness. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1095–1100 (2011).
Robinson, W. S. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. Am. Sociol. Rev. 15, 351 (1950).
Schmidt-Catran, A. W. & Fairbrother, M. The random effects in multilevel models: getting them wrong and getting them right. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 32, 23–38 (2016).
Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., Fischer, J. A. V. V., Schnellenbach, J. & Gehring, K. Inequality and happiness: when perceived social mobility and economic reality do not match. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 91, 75–92 (2013).
Helliwell, J. F. & Huang, H. How’s your government? international evidence linking good government and well-being. Br. J. Political Sci. 38, 595–619 (2008).
Jiang, S., Lu, M. & Sato, H. Identity, inequality, and happiness: evidence from urban China. World Dev. 40, 1190–1200 (2012).
Ott, J. Level and inequality of happiness in nations: does greater happiness of a greater number imply greater inequality in happiness? J. Happiness Stud. 6, 397–420 (2005).
Zagorski, K., Evans, M. D. R., Kelley, J. & Piotrowska, K. Does national income inequality affect individuals’ quality of life in Europe? Inequality, happiness, finances, and health. Soc. Indic. Res. 117, 1089–1110 (2014).
Kelley, J. & Evans, M. D. R. Societal inequality and individual subjective well-being: results from 68 societies and over 200,000 individuals, 1981–2008. Soc. Sci. Res. 62, 1–23 (2017).
Hastings, O. P. Less equal, less trusting? Longitudinal and cross-sectional effects of income inequality on trust in U.S. states, 1973–2012. Soc. Sci. Res. 74, 77–95 (2018).
Oishi, S., Kushlev, K. & Schimmack, U. Progressive taxation, income inequality, and happiness. Am. Psychol. 73, 157–168 (2018).
Sommet, N., Morselli, D. & Spini, D. Income inequality affects the psychological health only for people facing scarcity. Psychol. Sci. 29, 1911–1921 (2018).
Schneider, S. M. Why income inequality is dissatisfying — perceptions of social status and the inequality-satisfaction link in Europe. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 35, 409–430 (2019).
Clark, A. E. Inequality-aversion and income mobility: a direct test. DELTA Working Paper 2003–11. CNRS and DELTA Federation https://worlddatabaseofhappiness-archive.eur.nl/hap_bib/freetexts/clark_ae_2003.pdf (2003).
Benabou, R. & Ok, E. A. Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: the POUM hypothesis. Q. J. Econ. 116, 447–487 (2001).
Cheung, F. Can income inequality be associated with positive outcomes? Hope mediates the positive inequality–happiness link in rural China. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 7, 320–330 (2016).
Davis, L. Growth, inequality and tunnel effects: a formal mode. J. Happiness Stud. 20, 1103–1119 (2019).
Hirschman, A. & Rothschild, M. The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development. Q. J. Econ. 87, 544–566 (1973).
Tan, J., Jachimowicz, J., Smerdon, D. & Hauser, O. P. Opposing effects of economic inequality concentrated at the top or bottom of the income distribution on subjective well-being. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://psyarxiv.com/5rcmz/ (2020).
Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á., Willis, G. B. & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. Economic and social distance: perceived income inequality negatively predicts an interdependent self-construal. Int. J. Psychol. 54, 117–125 (2019).
Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á., Willis, G. B., Jetten, J. & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. Economic inequality enhances inferences that the normative climate is individualistic and competitive. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 49, 1114–1127 (2019).
Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á., Rodríguez-Bailón, R. & Willis, G. B. Economic inequality affects perceived normative values. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 25, 211–226 (2020).
Cheng, L., Zhou, X., Wang, F. & Hao, M. The greater the economic inequality, the later people have children: the association between economic inequality and reproductive timing. Scand. J. Psychol. 61, 450–459 (2020).
Nishi, A., Shirado, H., Rand, D. G. & Christakis, N. A. Inequality and visibility of wealth in experimental social networks. Nature 526, 426–429 (2015).
Kirkland, K., Jetten, J. & Nielsen, M. The effect of economic inequality on young children’s prosocial decision-making. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 38, 512–528 (2020).
Melita, D., Willis, G. B. & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. Economic inequality increases status anxiety through perceived contextual competitiveness. Front. Psychol. 12, 1895 (2021).
del Fresno-Díaz, Á., Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á. & Willis, G. B. I choose to be powerful: economic inequality encourages preferences of power over status positions. Soc. Sci. J. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1949547 (2021).
Cheng, L., Hao, M. & Wang, F. Beware of the ‘bad guys’: economic inequality, perceived competition, and social vigilance. Int. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 34, 1–12 (2021).
Du, H. et al. Perceived income inequality increases status seeking among low social class individuals. Asian J. Soc. Psychol. 25, 52–59 (2021).
Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á., Jetten, J., Willis, G. & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. High economic inequality makes us feel less wealthy. Int. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 32, 17 (2019).
Schmalor, A. & Heine, S. J. The construct of subjective economic inequality. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 13, 1–10 (2021).
Castillo, J. C., García-Castro, J. D. & Venegas, M. Perception of economic inequality: concepts, associated factors and prospects of a burgeoning research agenda. Int. J. Soc. Psychol. 37, 180–207 (2022).
Gugushvili, A., Reeves, A. & Jarosz, E. How do perceived changes in inequality affect health? Health Place. 62, 102276 (2020).
Oshio, T. & Urakawa, K. The association between perceived income inequality and subjective well-being: evidence from a social survey in Japan. Soc. Indic. Res. 116, 755–770 (2014).
Han, C. Health implications of socioeconomic characteristics, subjective social status, and perceptions of inequality: an empirical study of China. Soc. Indic. Res. 119, 495–514 (2014).
Chung, S. & Lee, S. Poverty and perceived income inequality and changes in growth trajectory of problem drinking. Korean J. Health Educ. Promotion 32, 43–51 (2015).
Loveless, M. The deterioration of democratic political culture: consequences of the perception of inequality. Soc. Justice Res. 26, 471–491 (2013).
Siahpush, M. et al. The association of smoking with perception of income inequality, relative material well-being, and social capital. Soc. Sci. Med. 63, 2801–2812 (2006).
Fernquist, R. M. Perceived income inequality and suicide rates in Central/Eastern European countries and Western countries, 1990–1993. Death Stud. 27, 63–80 (2003).
Fatke, M. Inequality perceptions, preferences conducive to redistribution, and the conditioning role of social position. Societies 8, 99 (2018).
Minkoff, S. L. & Lyons, J. Living with inequality: neighborhood income diversity and perceptions of the income gap. Am. Politics Res. 47, 329–361 (2019).
Han, C., Janmaat, J., Hoskins, B. & Green, A. Perceptions of inequalities: implications for social cohesion. LLAKES https://www.llakes.ac.uk/publication/research-paper-35-perceptions-of-inequalities-implications-for-social-cohesion/ (2012).
Newman, B. J. Inequality growth and economic policy liberalism: an updated test of a classic theory. J. Politics 82, 765–770 (2020).
Johnson, T. & Smirnov, O. Inequality as information: wealth homophily facilitates the evolution of cooperation. Sci. Rep. 8, 11605 (2018).
Zhang, K., Hou, Y. & Li, G. Threat of infectious disease during an outbreak: influence on tourists’ emotional responses to disadvantaged price inequality. Ann. Tour. Res. 84, 102993 (2020).
Melita, D., Velandia-Morales, A., Iruela-Toros, D., Willis, G. B. & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. Spanish version of the status anxiety scale. Int. J. Soc. Psychol. 35, 342–369 (2020).
Gimpelson, V. & Treisman, D. Misperceiving inequality. Econ. Politics 30, 27–54 (2017).
Hauser, O. P. & Norton, M. I. (Mis)perceptions of inequality. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 18, 21–25 (2017).
Easterbrook, M. J. The social psychology of economic inequality. UNU-WIDER https://www.wider.unu.edu/publication/social-psychology-economic-inequality (2021).
Son Hing, L. S. et al. Failure to respond to rising income inequality: processes that legitimize growing disparities. Daedalus 148, 105–135 (2019).
Mijs, J. J. B. & Roe, E. L. Is America coming apart? Socioeconomic segregation in neighborhoods, schools, workplaces, and social networks, 1970–2020. Sociol. Compass 15, e12884 (2021).
Cruces, G., Perez-Truglia, R. & Tetaz, M. Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: evidence from a survey experiment. J. Publ. Econ. 98, 100–112 (2013).
Dawtry, R. J., Sutton, R. M. & Sibley, C. G. Why wealthier people think people are wealthier, and why it matters: from social sampling to attitudes to redistribution. Psychol. Sci. 26, 1389–1400 (2015).
MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L. & Lockwood, C. M. Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prev. Sci. 1, 173–181 (2000).
Akyelken, N. Urban conceptions of economic inequalities. Regional Stud. 54, 863–872 (2020).
Phillips, T. et al. Inequality in people’s minds. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://psyarxiv.com/vawh9/ (2020).
García-Castro, J. D., García-Sánchez, E., Montoya-Lozano, M. & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. The perception of economic inequality in everyday life: my friends with the most and least money. Asian J. Soc. Psychol. 25, 20–34 (2021).
García-Castro, J. D., Willis, G. B. & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. I know people who can and who cannot: a measure of the perception of economic inequality in everyday life. Soc. Sci. J. 56, 599–608 (2018).
García-Castro, J. D., Rodríguez-Bailón, R. & Willis, G. B. Perceiving economic inequality in everyday life decreases tolerance to inequality. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 90, 104019 (2020).
Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A. & Gosling, S. D. Ideology: its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3, 126–136 (2008).
Napier, J. L., Bettinsoli, M. L. & Suppes, A. The palliative function of system-justifying ideologies. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 34, 129–134 (2020).
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M. & Malle, B. F. Social dominance orientation: a personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 67, 741–763 (1994).
Jost, J. T. & Hunyady, O. Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 14, 260–265 (2005).
Lerner, M. J. The Belief in a Just World (Springer, 1980).
Rudman, L. A. & Saud, L. H. Justifying social inequalities: the role of social Darwinism. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 46, 1139–1155 (2020).
Azevedo, F., Jost, J. T., Rothmund, T. & Sterling, J. Neoliberal ideology and the justification of inequality in capitalist societies: why social and economic dimensions of ideology are intertwined. J. Soc. Issues 75, 49–88 (2019).
Mijs, J. J. B. The paradox of inequality: income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand. Socioecon. Rev. 19, 7–35 (2021).
Cojocaru, A. Prospects of upward mobility and preferences for redistribution: evidence from the Life in Transition Survey. Eur. J. Political Econ. 34, 300–314 (2014).
Larsen, C. A. How three narratives of modernity justify economic inequality. Acta Sociol. 59, 93–111 (2016).
García-Sánchez, E., Van der Toorn, J., Rodríguez-Bailón, R. & Willis, G. B. The vicious cycle of economic inequality: the role of ideology in shaping the relationship between “what is” and “what ought to be” in 41 countries. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 10, 991–1001 (2019).
Roex, K. L. A., Huijts, T. & Sieben, I. Attitudes towards income inequality: ‘winners’ versus ‘losers’ of the perceived meritocracy. Acta Sociol. 62, 47–63 (2019).
Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C. & Thorisdottir, H. Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).
Jost, J. T. Working class conservatism: a system justification perspective. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 18, 73–78 (2017).
Chambers, J. R., Swan, L. K. & Heesacker, M. Better off than we know: distorted perceptions of incomes and income inequality in America. Psychol. Sci. 25, 613–618 (2014).
Waldfogel, H. B., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Hauser, O. P., Ho, A. K. & Kteily, N. S. Ideology selectively shapes attention to inequality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2023985118 (2021).
Kteily, N. S., Sheehy-Skeffington, J. & Ho, A. K. Hierarchy in the eye of the beholder: (anti-)egalitarianism shapes perceived levels of social inequality. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 112, 136–159 (2017).
García-Sánchez, E. et al. How fair is economic inequality? Belief in a just world and the legitimation of economic disparities in 27 European countries. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 48, 382–395 (2021).
Du, H. & King, R. B. What predicts perceived economic inequality? The roles of actual inequality, system justification, and fairness considerations. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 61, 19–36 (2021).
Costa-Lopes, R., Dovidio, J. F., Pereira, C. R. & Jost, J. T. Social psychological perspectives on the legitimation of social inequality: past, present and future. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 43, 229–237 (2013).
Starmans, C., Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., Christakis, N. A. & Brown, G. D. Why people prefer unequal societies. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0082 (2017).
Sengupta, N. K., Greaves, L. M., Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. The sigh of the oppressed: the palliative effects of ideology are stronger for people living in highly unequal neighbourhoods. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 56, 437–454 (2017).
Schlenker, B. R., Chambers, J. R. & Le, B. M. Conservatives are happier than liberals, but why? Political ideology, personality, and life satisfaction. J. Res. Personal. 46, 127–146 (2012).
Osborne, D., García-Sánchez, E. & Sibley, C. G. in The Social Psychology of Inequality 249–266 (Springer International, 2019).
Goudarzi, S., Pliskin, R., Jost, J. T. & Knowles, E. D. Economic system justification predicts muted emotional responses to inequality. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–9 (2020).
Wakslak, C. J., Jost, J. T., Tyler, T. R. & Chen, E. S. Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychol. Sci. 18, 267–274 (2007).
García-Sánchez, E., Osborne, D., Willis, G. B. & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. Attitudes towards redistribution and the interplay between perceptions and beliefs about inequality. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 59, 111–136 (2020).
Bahamondes, J., Gómez, F., Barrientos, J., Cárdenas, M. & Guzmán-González, M. Numbing the perception of stigma: system justification decreases psychological distress by reducing perceived stigma among gay men and lesbians. Int. J. Soc. Psychol. 35, 282–309 (2020).
Bahamondes, J., Sibley, C. G. & Osborne, D. System justification and perceptions of group-based discrimination: investigating the temporal order of the ideologically motivated minimization (or exaggeration) of discrimination across low- and high-status groups. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 12, 431–441 (2021).
Vargas-Salfate, S., Paez, D., Khan, S. S., Liu, J. H. & Gil de Zúñiga, H. System justification enhances well-being: a longitudinal analysis of the palliative function of system justification in 18 countries. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 57, 567–590 (2018).
Fairbrother, M. & Martin, I. W. Does inequality erode social trust? Results from multilevel models of US states and counties. Soc. Sci. Res. 42, 347–360 (2013).
Sibley, C. G. Sampling procedure and sample details for the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://psyarxiv.com/wgqvy/ (2021).
Blom, A. G., Gathmann, C. & Krieger, U. Setting up an online panel representative of the general population: the German Internet Panel. Field Methods 27, 391–408 (2015).
Moreno-Bella, E., Willis, G. B. G. B. & Moya, M. Economic inequality and masculinity–femininity: the prevailing perceived traits in higher unequal contexts are masculine. Front. Psychol. 10, 1590 (2019).
Sprong, S. et al. “Our country needs a strong leader right now”: economic inequality enhances the wish for a strong leader. Psychol. Sci. 30, 1625–1637 (2019).
Keller, A. C., Spurk, D., Baumeler, F. & Hirschi, A. Competitive climate and workaholism: negative sides of future orientation and calling. Personal. Individ. Diff. 96, 122–126 (2016).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (PID2019-105643GB-I00 and PCI2020-112285), Andalucía’s government grants (A-SEJ-72-UGR20) and the Centre for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies (COES) (ANID/FONDAP/15130009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
G.B.W. wrote a first draft of the manuscript after discussing the ideas with all co-authors. All co-authors then revised and rewrote several parts of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Psychology thanks Felix Cheung, who co-reviewed with Amanda Solomon, and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Willis, G.B., García-Sánchez, E., Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á. et al. The psychosocial effects of economic inequality depend on its perception. Nat Rev Psychol 1, 301–309 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00044-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00044-0
- Springer Nature America, Inc.
This article is cited by
-
Economic segregation is associated with reduced concerns about economic inequality
Nature Communications (2024)
-
When perception shapes reality: Effects of perceived income inequality and social mobility on affective polarization
The Journal of Economic Inequality (2024)
-
The Mediating Role of Perception of Society Between Income Inequality and Life Satisfaction. Insights from the European Social Survey
Applied Research in Quality of Life (2024)
-
Perceived Economic Inequality Is Negatively Associated with Subjective Well-being through Status Anxiety and Social Trust
Social Indicators Research (2024)
-
Perceived inequality in society may not motivate increased food intake in the absence of personal socioeconomic disadvantage
BMC Public Health (2023)