Abstract
Alternating copolymers are distinctly unique in comparison with other copolymers. Herein, an in-depth investigation of the oxyanionic ring-opening copolymerization of propylene oxide (PO) and allyl glycidyl ether (AGE) from benzyl alcohol (BnOH) activated with potassium acetate (KOAc) complexed by 18-crown-6 ether (18C6) is described. We demonstrate that the 18C6/KOAc complex is an efficient and benign catalytic system to promote copolymerization of both oxirane monomers, leading to well-defined polyethers with varied comonomer content and low dispersity values (ƉM < 1.20). Kinetic analysis confirmed the controlled nature of the (co)polymerization process, and the determination of reactivity ratios revealed a quasi-alternating copolymerization profile, according to the Fineman-Ross method. The comparison between the quasi-alternating-type PO/AGE copolymerization and block or gradient copolymerization revealed significant differences, to confirm the different sequence incorporation in the different topological copolymers. These results highlight the great potential of 18C6/KOAc-mediated copolymerization process for the controlled sythesis of a series of copolymer topologies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Introduction
The development of controlled (co)polymerization techniques for epoxides has significantly expanded the scope of polymer science and engineering, offering new opportunities for the synthesis of advanced polymeric materials1,2. The ability to precisely control the monomer distribution along the copolymer chain is essential to tailor the physical and mechanical properties, unlocking applications which are not accessible with the homopolymers or random copolymers. Propylene oxide (PO) is one of the most important epoxide monomers, holding a dominant position as starting material processed in the polymer industry on a megaton scale3. The oxyanionic ring-opening polymerization (ROP) using alkali metal alkoxide initiators represents the method of choice for preparing poly(propylene oxide) (PPO) and a large fraction of polyethers, including its copolymers4,5,6. In these systems, especially at high temperatures, the strong basicity of the initiating/propagating alkoxides gives rise to irreversible chain transfer processes through the proton abstraction from the methyl group of PO, leading to the formation of an allyl alkoxide, which in turn may acts as an initiator of a new chain, impairing polymerization efficiency and molar mass of the obtained polyethers4,7,8,9,10. Several polymerization strategies using anionic or coordination catalysts, such as double metal cyanide (DMC) complexes2,11,12,13, tri-isobutylaluminum (i-Bu3Al)14,15,16,17, organic Lewis pair comprising of phosphazene bases and triethylborane (Et3B)18, successfully afforded well-defined PPO via controlled/living polymerization procedures. Although effective, some of these catalytic systems often required expensive and unstable reagents, complicated handling techniques, and strict temperature control. To meet the rising demand for sustainable and simple ROP systems, the organocatalytic polymerization approach has emerged as a powerful tool for polyether synthesis19,20,21,22,23. In this context, alkali metal carboxylate catalysts, eventually complexed by crown ethers24,25, have played a crucial role in the development of various (co)polymers due to their ability to be used in bulk, of their low cost and low toxicity. Our group has recently demonstrated the potential of an equimolar mixture of potassium acetate (KOAc) and 18-crown-6 ether (18C6) as a robust and benign catalytic system for preparing PPO in a controlled fashion at room temperature and in solvent-free conditions26. In the presence of 18C6/KOAc complex, hydrogen-bonded alcohols act as soft nucleophiles promoting the PO polymerization, while drastically limiting the occurrence of parasitic hydrogen abstraction27,28,29,30,31.
The copolymerization of PO with other epoxide monomers, in order to increase chemical functionality within the PPO backbone, remains at the forefront in this field12,13. The copolymerization of ethylene oxide (EO) and PO has been extensively studied due to the huge potential of P(EO-co-PO) copolymers12,32,33,34,35. Recent studies, using NMR spectroscopy for monitoring the comonomer consumption during the whole polymerization and for determining the reactivity ratios, have highlighted distinctive differences of the copolymerization behavior of the two monomers depending on copolymerization technique12. In the conventional oxyanionic ROP, the copolymerization of EO with PO or glycidyl ethers usually leads to perfectly random copolymers, as it has been established in several kinetics studies36,37,38,39. Interestingly, the few cases of copolymerizations based on monomer-activated anionic ROP resulted in pronounced gradient structures, as in the case of alkylene oxides and glycidyl ethers, due to the lower reactivity of the former when compared to the latter class34,40,41.
The microstructure of the resulting copolymers is reflected in the properties and in the field of applications. For instance, random P(EO-co-PO) are used as water-soluble lubricants, preventing foaming due their higher surface tension compared to PEO-b-PPO block copolymers42,43, while PEO-b-PPO-b-PEO triblock copolymers are non-ionic surfactants and are used as pharmaceutical ingredients, agricultural products or food additives44. Whereas the possibility of gradient copolymerization for P(EO-co-PO) has been demonstrated12, epoxide-based alternating copolymers have not yet been reported to our knowledge and thus they represent a major challenge. Furthermore, to date, the copolymerization of PO with allyl glycidyl ether (AGE), including the determination of reactivity ratios, is a largely unexplored area.
In this contribution, we report that the quasi-alternating polymerization between oxirane monomers, namely PO and AGE, is indeed possible using the 18C6/KOAc-mediated oxyanionic ROP system at room temperature and in solvent-free conditions. The quasi-alternating copolymerization mechanism is supported by the reactivity ratios of comonomers using the Fineman−Ross method45, determined from the monomer consumption during the copolymerization, and by the characterization by combined analyses, including 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS), and size exclusion chromatography (SEC) measurements. Using controlled sequential additions of monomer or comonomer feeds at different reaction periods, we report the synthesis of diblock and gradient copolymers of the PO and AGE couple of oxirane monomers, expanding the scope of the oxyanionic ROP system. NMR spectroscopies and MALDI mass spectrometry were used to confirm the differences in the sequence incorporation of monomers between the different topologies (quasi-alternating, diblock, and gradient) of the PO/AGE copolymers. We anticipate that the developed quasi-alternating P(PO-co-AGE) copolymer, as well as the block and gradient congeners, will provide a special polyether platforms offering broad scientific appeal encompassing the fields of synthetic and physical polymer chemistry and post-functionalization, biomaterials and medicine, and beyond.
Results and discussion
Homopolymerizations of propylene oxide and allyl glycidyl ether
Before copolymerizations were undertaken, we first investigated the homopolymerizations of PO and AGE in bulk at room temperature from a benzyl alcohol (BnOH) initiator activated by 18C6/KOAc complex ([BnOH]0/[18C6/KOAc]0 = 2). Our group previously reported that 15 days were required to homopolymerize PO at 21 °C to get a degree of polymerization (DP = [PO]0/[OH]0) of 13026. Therefore, to reduce the reaction time, low molecular weight PPO and poly(allyl glycidyl ether) (PAGE) were prepared by targeting a degree of polymerization (DP = [M]0/[BnOH]0, with M, the monomer employed, i.e., PO or AGE) of 25. The consumption of monomers was monitored with time by 1H NMR spectroscopy, following the gradual decrease of epoxide methine signals. After 3 h of reaction, NMR analyses revealed that ≈12% of PO and ≈8% of AGE had been converted and a significant amount of unreacted BnOH (≈80%) was still present in both polymerizations (Supplementary Fig. 1). These results strongly suggest the occurrence of a long inhibition period before the actual chain growth can be observed. The SEC measurements provide additional details of the initial events in the polymerization process. During both polymerizations, an intermediate appears to form, detected at around 166 g.mol−1 after 2 h and present at least up to 6 h for PO (Fig. 1a) and at 225 g.mol−1 for AGE (Fig. 1b). SEC analysis of a mixture of 18C6/KOAc did not match the peak observed for the just mentioned intermediate. A plausible explanation of this phenomena could derive from the formation of a population of one-to-one adduct between BnOH and monomer that persists for a long time as dormant species. To ascertain the identity of the intermediate species, the reaction of PO and BnOH in bulk at room temperature targeting a DP of 2 was studied by a combination of SEC and 1H NMR analyses. The product obtained after 2 h shows a molar mass that coincides with that of the species detected in SEC chromatograms during the PO homopolymerization (Supplementary Fig. 2), and this observation was confirmed by NMR analysis (Supplementary Fig. 3). The inhibition period could probably be ascribed to a slow reaction between 18C6 and KOAc, to form the dissociated species AcO- and K+/18C6, leading a potassium acetate activator “strongly attached” to Bn-O-CH2-CH(R)-OH formed following the first addition (Fig. 1c). Thus, this catalyst/alcohol complex consumes part of the BnOH initiator before to really initiate propagation. Polymerizations proceeded in a near quantitative monomer conversion in 3 days to give a PPO and PAGE with, despite the inhibition step, a monomodal molecular weight distribution and narrow dispersity values (ÐM = Mw/Mn) of 1.16 for PO (Fig. 1a), and of 1.19 for AGE (Fig. 1b), as determined by SEC. No detrimental effect of proton abstraction has been observed in 1H and 13C NMR analyses of both final polymers (Supplementary Figs. 4–7).
Interestingly, 13C NMR spectrum of PAGE, which consisted predominantly of head-to-tail linkages, was analyzed in terms of triads on the methine carbon on the AGE repeat units, being sensitive to the specific regio- and stereo-configuration of the polymer46,47. The deconvolution per the triad signals associated with specific tacticity of the allyl substituents along the backbone revealed that the 18C6/KOAc-mediated ROP produced regio-regular and atactic PAGE with a statistical distribution of 22% isotactic, 25% syndiotactic, and 53% heterotactic triads (Supplementary Fig. 7).
To determine whether the nature of the initiator molecule impacts the initiation step, we examined the homopolymerizations using isopropyl alcohol (iPrOH) as initiator, while maintaining all other experimental conditions unchanged (conditions: [M]0/[iPrOH]0/[18C6/KOAc]0 = 25/1/0.5). The kinetic studies conducted via 1H NMR show a slow inhibition process comparable to the BnOH-initiated polymerization. Interestingly, SEC data suggest that the nature of alcohol influences the polymerization outcome. When BnOH is used as initiator, the one-to-one adduct signal observed in SEC chromatograms remains constant for both monomers, leading to uniform growth chains. In contrast, in iPrOH-initiated polymerization, low molecular weight oligomers begin to form at an early stage of polymerization, without formation or prolonged persistence of an iPr-O-CH2-CH(R)-OH adduct, yielding broader molecular weight distributions (Supplementary Fig. 8). Probably the iPrO-CH2-CH(R)-OH intermediate species is less stable than the intermediate formed between Bn-O-CH2-CH(R)-OH and KOAc and thus more prone to induce monomer propagation. To get more insight on that inhibition period, the relative position between the 18C6/KOAc activating complex and both Bn-O-CH2-CH(CH3)-OH and iPr-O-CH2-CH(CH3)-OH one-to-one adducts was evaluated by molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations (Fig. 2) using the COMPASSIII force field as implemented in the BIOVIA Materials Studio 2022 package48. It can be inferred that in comparison to the benzyl end-capped adduct (Fig. 2a) the less bulkier isopropyl extremity allows a better nesting of the iPr-O-CH2-CH(CH3)-OH with the activating complex allowing the hydroxyl extremity to be closer to the activation center (Fig. 2b). The hydrogen-bonding distance is longer for Bn-O-CH2-CH(CH3)-OH than for the iPr-O-CH2-CH(CH3)-OH (1.449 Å vs. 1.435 Å) which translates into smaller H-bond interactions for the former (29.3 kJ/mol versus 37.7 kJ/mol for Bn-O-CH2-CH(CH3)-OH and iPr-O-CH2-CH(CH3)-OH, respectively). Bn-O-CH2-CH(CH3)-OH adduct appears then as a less activated structure.
Initial studies confirmed the importance of this adduct interaction26, since this mechanism occurs entirely through hydrogen bonding between the propagating alcohol end-group and the acetate base. Despite the slow initial 18C6/KOAc/BnOH supramolecular organization by monomer molecules, the intermediate species formed plays a key role in increasing polymerization control and while both homopolymerizations are characterized by a long inhibition period, regardless of the nature of the initiator used, the polymerization kinetics exhibit similar profiles.
Copolymerizations of PO and AGE
Having gained a better understanding of the homopolymerization kinetics using a soft nucleophilic catalysis, we explored the simultaneous polymerization of PO and AGE using BnOH with the following molar mass ratios: [PO + AGE]0/[BnOH]0/[18C6/KOAc]0 = 25/1/0.5 (Fig. 3a). Copolymerizations were carried out in bulk at room temperature until complete consumption of monomers within 7 days. A series of poly[(propylene oxide)-co-(allyl glycidyl ether)] (P(PO-co-AGE)) copolymers were prepared by varying the initial monomer compositions (F = [PO]0/[AGE]0) (Fig. 3, Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1). SEC traces of the resultant copolymers revealed monomodal molecular weight distributions without a noticeable change in dispersity values (ƉM = 1.16–1.20), attesting an excellent control. Because AGE monomer exhibits higher molecular weight than PO, the number average molecular weight (Mn) of the copolymers increases with increasing amount of AGE incorporated, as evidenced by SEC chromatograms (Fig. 3b and Table 1).
In order to ascertain the possibility of specific interaction between PO and AGE, 1H NMR analyses using the Job method was carried out49, by examining several PO-AGE mixtures of varying compositions using THF-d8 as solvent, since it dissolves both monomers, it is inert and does not complex with either monomer (Supplementary Fig. 9). From the change in ∆δ of the methine proton of PO in the 1H NMR spectra a complex was clearly observed with a 1:1 stoichiometry between PO and AGE (Fig. 4). To some extent the formation of a binary complex between both PO and AGE already supports the acceptable rationale for the tendency of those comonomers to cross-propagate during their copolymerization50.
To support our hypothesis, the ability of both PO and AGE monomers to form a binary complex has also been confirmed at the DFT level by investigating the variation in interaction energies among representative dimers, from homo-dimers to hetero-dimers. For each system, we performed quenched dynamics using the COMPASSIII force field to determine their preferential orientations. Subsequently, we estimated the interaction energies of pure PO and AGE homo-dimers, i.e., PO/PO and AGE/AGE, as well as PO/AGE hetero-dimers, based on the lowest energy assembled structures and isolated compounds (all the technical details of the simulations are described in the SI). Our simulations predict an ascending trend in interaction energies, progressing from PO/PO dimers (−3.30 kcal/mol) to PO/AGE dimers (−4.34 kcal/mol), and finally to AGE/AGE dimers (−5.49 kcal/mol). This suggests that PO/AGE systems are more likely to occur than PO/PO homo-dimers.
1H NMR kinetic studies of the copolymerization were then performed to gain a deeper understanding of the evolution of the copolymer composition. Taking into account the occurrence of the inhibition period, the kinetic measurements were started after 30 min for F < 1, and after 60 min for F > 1. By monitoring the methine protons of PO (δ = 2.97–3.01 ppm, m) of AGE (δ = 3.14–3.18 ppm, m), and the characteristic polymer signal of the P(PO-co-AGE) backbone (δ = 3.48–3.63 ppm), the respective conversion rates were determined (Supplementary Fig. 10).
In all kinetic copolymerization experiments, regardless of the initial monomer composition used, in early stages of copolymerizations both comonomers are incorporated into the chain at almost the same frequency. Moreover, unlike the 3 days required for homopolymerizations, in copolymerizations a few hours are more than sufficient to achieve almost quantitative conversions of both comonomers, as evidenced from the conversion curves for both PO and AGE for a targeted F ([PO]0/[AGE]0) of 2.06 (Fig. 5a). Therefore, each of the propagating species prefers to add the other monomer rather than react with its own type of monomer and thus cross-over propagation takes place. For copolymerizations with F < 1 and F > 1, once the monomer present in low concentrations has been consumed, homopolymerization of unreacted oxirane follows to form block sequences. As observed from a representative 1H NMR data, methylene BnOH signals are continuously shifted during the whole inhibition time of the process, indicating that BnOH starts the initiation pathway (Fig. 5b). The resulting PO/AGE copolymers were analyzed by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy (Supplementary Figs. 11–20).
The findings were underpinned by the determination of the reactivity ratios for monomer pair PO/AGE according to the Fineman−Ross method at low comonomer conversion (<10–15%) and after freeing ourselves from the inhibition period and taking into account the few percent of comonomers that reacted during this period (Table 2).
As expected, the relation between the molar fraction of PO in the copolymer (\({f}_{{PO}}\)) and in the initial comonomer molar content (\({F}_{{PO}}\)) drawn from the kinetics, excluding the inhibition period, clearly indicates an alternating arragment of comonomers along the copolymer chain (Fig. 6a). The comonomer reactivity ratios calculated from the slope and Y-axis intercept were \({r}_{{PO}}\) = 0.25 and \({r}_{{AGE}}\) = 0.07, respectively (Fig. 6b). Although from these values of \({r}_{{PO}}\) and \({r}_{{AGE}}\) one can deduce that PO is slightly more reactive than AGE to go into the copolymer, which is possibly originated from the steric effect of the side chain, values of \({r}_{{PO}}\) and \({r}_{{AGE}}\) still quite close to zero imply rapid cross-propagation reactions, therefore, formation of partially alternating P(PO-co-AGE) copolymer is favored since the monomers show little inclination to homopolymerize. These results strongly support an quasi-alternating copolymerization profile.
Comparison between quasi-alternating, gradient, and diblock copolymers of PO/AGE
In order to confirm, by comparison with other copolymer topologies, the microstructure of the quasi-alternating copolymers, we prepared PPO-b-PAGE diblock and gradient P(PO-co-AGE) copolymers. They were synthesized by chain extension reactions with successive feed additions of monomers at different reaction times, adapting a procedure reported by Lutz and coworkers51,52, to target a final DP ~ 25 and F = 1 ([PO + AGE]0/[BnOH]0/[18C6/KOAc]0 = 25/1/0.5)(Supplementary Table 2), so to have a precise and accurate comparison with the quasi-alternating copolymer.
PO/AGE microstructure was first evaluated by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS). The monomodal peak distributions of MALDI-ToF MS spectra (Fig. 7, Supplementary Fig. 21) confirm the extent of control over the copolymerizations, the absence of undesired side reactions and, for diblock and gradient PO/AGE copolymers, as also evidenced by the evolution of SEC chromatograms recorded during the chain growth processes and the narrow associated dispersity values (ÐM < 1.30, Supplementary Figs. 22–27). It has been previously shown that the fragmentation pattern of a MALDI-ToF MS spectrum of a copolymer can be directly related to its topology53, and indeed substantial differences in the fragmentation pathways could be found in our systems. In the MALDI-ToF MS analysis of the quasi-alternating P(PO-co-AGE) copolymer both comonomers are incorporated in the polymer chain and the PO and AGE units arrange in an alternating sequence when the feed ratio is 1:1 (Fig. 7a). The minor series could be assigned to complexes formed with water molecules present in the MALDI mixture, or to very minor initiation with water molecules. Importantly, no signals attributable to E2-based elimination fragments were observed. For gradient P(PO-co-AGE) copolymer, the pattern of peaks in the MALDI-ToF MS spectrum (Fig. 7b) appears different from that given by the alternating congener (Fig. 7a). The chemical distributions observed display an arrangement of the comonomers in a more random format. In contrast, along the chain of PPO-b-PAGE diblock copolymer, two distinct monomer blocks can be observed (Supplementary Fig. 21).
The distinctive elements found in copolymers MALDI-ToF MS spectra allowed the “mapping” of the chain composition, and served as a characteristic signature for each topology.
1H and 13C NMR analyses of final PO/AGE copolymers are further evidence of the peculiar catalytic performance of the ROP system developed in controlling the copolymer architecture. (Supplementary Figs. 11–20). As reported by Lynd and coworkers37, the benzylic protons are sensitive to the sequence of the monomers added to the initiator and provide a record of the early events occurring during the copolymerization. In this respect, all 1H NMR spectra of the quasi-alternating copolymers provide consistent results indicating that the BnOH activated by 18C6/KOAc complex can indiscriminately attack both monomers, as demonstrated by the chemical shift values of the PhCH2 end-groups in the copolymers being intermediate to those of the two homopolymers (Supplementary Figs. 11–13, 15–16, 18, and 19). The benzyl proton resonances of resulting diblock and gradient copolymers match perfectly to those of homopolymers (Supplementary Figs. 23 and 26). 13C NMR spectra contain additional prominent cross-peaks from mixed PO/AGE heterotriad sequences as a result of neighboring PO and AGE repeat units, that are present at very low intensity in the case of gradient P(PO-co-AGE) copolymer, while total absent in the PPO-b-PAGE diblock copolymer, supporting a quasi-alternating-type copolymer microstructure (Fig. 8, Supplementary Figs. 14, 17, 20, 24, and 27). The 13C NMR spectrum of the diblock copolymer revealed sharp peaks associated with PPO and PAGE homotriad sequences (Supplementary Figs. 28 and 29).
Conclusions
In conclusion, we thoroughly investigated the formation kinetics of PPO and PAGE homopolymers, as well as of P(PO-co-AGE) copolymers, synthesized from BnOH activated with 18C6/KOAc complex. The 18C6/KOAc complex is a really efficient and robust system to promote copolymerization of both oxirane monomers with no detrimental effect of side reactions. The reactivity ratios determined by 1H NMR kinetics, using Fineman-Ross method, and the structural information derived from a combination of analyses provide important understanding of the 18C6/KOAc-mediated copolymerization, which provided a remarkable “quasi-alternating” process. Furthermore, sequence-controlled diblock and gradient copolymers with tunable molecular weight and microstructure are readily achieved. Taken together, these results demonstrate the remarkable ability of a single acetate-based catalyst to build copolyethers with well-defined architectures and controlled sequences in response to the type of “monomer diet” in the reaction feed. To the best of our knowledge, we reported the first case in which two epoxides are arranged in a unique quasi-alternating architecture. The controlled copolymerization of oxiranes mediated by 18C6/KOAc complex opens up new avenues for programmable design of new alternating, eventually stereodefined, copolymer platforms providing control of mechanical-functional properties not accessible with the more common gradient or block copolymers. Our future studies will focus on how these differences in tacticity affect the physical and chemical properties of such copolymers to guide the development of new materials for functional applications.
Experimental
Materials and Methods
Materials
Propylene oxide (PO, ≥99%, Aldrich) and allyl glycidyl ether (AGE, ≥99%, Aldrich) were dried over CaH2, distilled and stored over molecular sieves. Benzyl alcohol (BnOH) and isopropyl alcohol (iPrOH) were dried over CaH2 for 48 h prior to their distillation under reduced pressure. Potassium acetate (KOAc, ≥99%, VWR) was dried by heating at 100 °C under vacuum for 48 h. 18-Crown ether-6 (18C6, 99%, ACROS Organics) was dried by three azeotropic distillations of tetrahydrofuran (THF). Compounds were all stored in a glove box (O2 ≤ 6 ppm, H2O ≤ 1 ppm). THF solvent was dried using a MBraun Solvent Purification System (model MB-SPS 800) equipped with alumina drying columns.
General techniques
1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded using a Bruker AVANCEII 500 MHz apparatus and a Bruker Avance III 400 MHz spectrometer at room temperature in chloroform-d1 (CDCl3). All spectra were acquired according to the following parameters: aq = 6.8 s, d1 = 10 s, sw = 12, o1p = 5, ns = 128 (4000 for 13C), PULPROG zg30. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) was performed in THF at 35 °C using a Triple Detection Polymer Laboratories liquid chromatograph equipped with a refractive index (ERMA 7517), a UV detector (254 nm), a capillary viscometry, a light scattering RALS (Viscotek T-60) (Polymer Laboratories GPC-RI/CV / RALS) and an automatic injector (Polymer Laboratories GPC-RI/UV) and four columns : a PL gel 10 µm guard column and three PL gel Mixed-B 10 µm columns (linear columns for separation of MwPS ranging from 500 to 106 daltons). All samples for SEC analyses were prepared according to the following concentration: 5–10 mg of polymer sample in 1 mL of THF. Positive-ion MALDI-Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-MS) experiments were recorded using a Waters QToF Premier mass spectrometer equipped with a Nd:YAG (third harmonic) operating at 355 nm with a maximum output of 65 µJ delivered to the sample in 2.2 ns pulses at 50 Hz repeating rate. Time-of-flight mass analyses were performed in the reflectron mode at a resolution of about 10,000. All the samples were analyzed using trans-2-[3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methylprop-2-enylidene]malononitrile (DCTB) as matrix. That matrix was prepared as 40 mg.mL−1 solution in CHCl3. The matrix solution (1 μL) was applied to a stainless steel target and air-dried. Polymer samples were dissolved in THF to obtain 1 mg.mL−1 solutions. Therefore, 1 μL of this solution was applied onto the target area already bearing the matrix crystals, and air-dried. For the recording of the single-stage MS spectra, the quadrupole (rf-only mode) was set to pass all the ions of the distribution, and they were transmitted into the pusher region of the time-of-flight analyzer where they were mass analyzed with 1 s integration time. Data were acquired in continuum mode until acceptable averaged data were obtained. Molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations have been performed with the COMPASSIII force field as implemented in the BIOVIA Materials Studio 2022 package. In practice, adducts and the 18C6/KOAc complex have been put in contact and then subjected to a geometry optimization followed by successive 5-ns long quenched dynamics (NVT; quench every 5 ps) at increasing temperature (T = 300 K, 400 K, 600 K and 1000 K). At each temperature, multiple quenched dynamics runs have been performed until energy convergence between two successive runs is reached. The impact of the presence of the initiator on the interactions between the propagating monomer and the acetate has been evaluated on one hand from the distance measurements between the hydrogen of the hydroxyl group of the propagating monomer and the oxygen of the acetate and on the other hand from the amplitude of the H-Bond interactions as implemented in the Dreiding forcefield. To compute interaction energies among pure PO and AGE homo-dimers, as well as PO/AGE hetero-dimers, each system have been first built and optimized at the COMPASSIII level followed by successive 5-ns long quenched dynamics (NVT; quench every 5 ps) at increasing temperature (T = 100 K, 200 K, 300 K and 400 K). At each temperature, multiple quenched dynamics simulations were performed until achieving energy convergence between consecutive runs. The interaction energies were then calculated as the energy difference between the energy of the dimers and the cumulative energy of its isolated components.
Synthesis and characterization
General procedure for PO homopolymerization from BnOH
In a glove box, a vial equipped with a stir bar was charged with BnOH (21 mg, 0.194 × 10−3 mol), KOAc (9.4 mg, 0.096 × 10−3 mol), 18C6 (25.5 mg, 0.096 × 10−3 mol), and PO (281 mg, 4.8 × 10−3 mol). The reaction is then performed at 21 °C and kinetically studied by SEC analysis and 1H NMR spectroscopy.
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 1.07–1.14 (m, −CH3), 3.32–3.60 (broad m, −O − CH2 − CH(CH3) − O − ), 4.54 (s, Ph−CH2 − O − ), 7.17–7.33 (broad m, Ph−CH2 − O − ). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz): δ 17.45 ( − CH3), 73.09 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH3) − O − , rrm or mrr), 73.42 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH3) − O − , m), 75.23 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH3) − O − , rr), 75.47 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH3) − O − , mr + rm), 75.66 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH3) − O − , mm), 127.65/127.60/128.46/138.59 (Ph−CH2 − O − ).
General procedure for AGE homopolymerization from BnOH
In a glove box, a vial equipped with a stir bar was charged with BnOH (21 mg, 0.194 × 10−3 mol), KOAc (9.4 mg, 0.096 × 10−3 mol), 18C6 (25.5 mg, 0.096 × 10−3 mol), and AGE (554 mg, 4.8 × 10−3 mol). The reaction is then performed at 21 °C and kinetically studied by SEC analysis and 1H NMR spectroscopy.
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 3.40–3.67 (broad m, −O − CH2 − CH(CH2 − O − CH2 − CH = CH2) − O − ), 3.97–3.98 (d, −O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 4.53 (s, −Ph−CH2 − O − ), 5.13–5.27 (doublet of doublets, −O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 5.84–5.89 (m, −O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 7.32 (broad m, Ph−CH2 − O − ). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz): δ 69.92 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH2 − O − CH2 − CH = CH2) − O − , rrm or mrr), 69.31–70.35 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH2 − O − CH2 − CH = CH2) − O − , m), 72.39 ( − O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 78.94 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH2 − O − CH2 − CH = CH2) − O − ), 116.85 ( − O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 127.69/127.71/128.48/138.46 (Ph−CH2 − O − ), 134.89 ( − O − CH2 − CH = CH2).
General procedure for PO SN2 reaction with BnOH
In a glove box, a vial equipped with a stir bar was charged with BnOH (100 mg, 0.92 × 10−3 mol), KOAc (45 mg, 0.46 × 10−3 mol), 18C6 (122 mg, 0.46 × 10−3 mol), and PO (107 mg, 1.84 × 10−3 mol). The reaction is then performed at 21 °C and kinetically studied by SEC analysis and 1H NMR spectroscopy.
1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 1.07–1.14 (m, −CH3), 3.27–3.48 (m, −O − CH2 − CH(CH3) − O − ), 4.55 (s, Ph−CH2 − O − ), 7.33 (broad m, Ph−CH2 − O − ).
General procedure for copolymerization of PO and AGE from BnOH
In a glove box, a vial equipped with a stir bar was charged with BnOH, KOAc, 18C6, PO and AGE. All copolymerizations were carried out in bulk at r.t. by targeting a degree of polymerization (DP = [PO + AGE]0/[BnOH]0) of 25 and varying the initial monomer composition (F = [PO]0/[AGE]0) (Supplementary Table 1). The polymerization kinetics were determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy in function of time. The resulting copolymers were analyzed by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy. The number average molar mass (Mn) and the dispersity (ƉM) were determined by SEC analysis.
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 1.12 (m, −CH3), 3.40–3.70 (broad m, ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH3) − O− and −O − CH2 − CH(CH2 − O − CH2 − CH = CH2) − O − ), 3.99 (d, −O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 4.53–4.54 (s, −Ph−CH2 − O − ), 5.13–5.27 (doublet of doublets, −O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 5.84–5.89 (m, −O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 7.32 (broad m, Ph−CH2 − O − ). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz): δ 17.46 ( − CH3), 69.33/70.36 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH2 − O − CH2 − CH = CH2) − O − ), 72.40 ( − O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 73.50 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH3) − O − ), 74.18/74.65/74.84 ( − O − CH2 − CH(R) − O − , PO/AGE heterotriads), 75.47 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH3) − O − ), 78.94 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH2 − O − CH2 − CH = CH2) − O − ), 116.84 ( − O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 127.66/127.70/128.47/138.47 (Ph−CH2 − O − ), 134.92 ( − O − CH2 − CH = CH2).
General procedure for sequential block copolymerization of PO and AGE
In a glove box, a vial equipped with a stir bar was charged with BnOH (23.9 mg, 0.22 × 10−3 mol), KOAc (10.8 mg, 0.11 × 10−3 mol), 18C6 (29 mg, 0.11 × 10−3 mol) and PO (170 mg, 2.9 × 10−3 mol). After complete monomer consumption of PO within 2 days, AGE (347 mg, 3 × 10−3 mol) was added, and the mixture was stirred at r.t. until full conversion was achieved. The number average molar mass (Mn) and the dispersity (ƉM) were determined by SEC analysis at each stage of monomer incorporation. The resulting copolymer was analyzed by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy.
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 1.12 (m, −CH3), 3.40–3.70 (broad m, ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH3) − O− and −O − CH2 − CH(CH2 − O − CH2 − CH = CH2) − O − ), 3.99 (d, −O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 4.54 (s, −Ph−CH2 − O − ), 5.13-5.27 (doublet of doublets, −O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 5.84–5.89 (m, −O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 7.32 (broad m, Ph−CH2 − O − ). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz): δ 17.02/17.27 ( − CH3), 69.69/70.28 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH2 − O − CH2 − CH = CH2) − O − ), 72.12 ( − O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 73.11/72.78 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH3) − O − ), 75.20 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH3) − O − ), 78.63 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH2 − O − CH2 − CH = CH2) − O − ), 116.55/116.97 ( − O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 127.34/127.38/128.15/138.27 (Ph−CH2 − O − ), 134.35/134.74 ( − O − CH2 − CH = CH2).
General procedure for sequence-controlled PO/AGE copolymerization
In a glove box, a vial equipped with a stir bar was charged with BnOH, KOAc, 18C6, and AGE to generate the first block. The synthesis was carried out in bulk at r.t. with successive feed additions of monomers. Each feed addition was carried out after monitoring by NMR full conversion of all monomers, which occurred after 48–72 h. The total quantities of monomers (vs. initiator) were calculated to target a final degree of polymerization (DP = [PO + AGE]0/[BnOH]0) of ~25 and F = [PO]0/[AGE]0 = 1 (Supplementary Table 2, Section 2.2). The number average molar mass (Mn) and the dispersity (ƉM) were determined by SEC analysis during the entire chain growth process. The resulting copolymer was analyzed by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy.
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 1.12 (m, −CH3), 3.40–3.70 (broad m, ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH3) − O− and −O − CH2 − CH(CH2 − O − CH2 − CH = CH2) − O − ), 3.99 (d, −O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 4.53 (s, −Ph−CH2 − O − ), 5.13–5.27 (doublet of doublets, −O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 5.84–5.89 (m, −O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 7.32 (broad m, Ph−CH2 − O − ). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz): δ 17.46/17.59 ( − CH3), 69.56/70.31 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH2 − O − CH2 − CH = CH2) − O − ), 72.41/72.44 ( − O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 72.95/73.51 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH3) − O − ), 74.55 (PO/AGE heterotriads), 75.48 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH3) − O − ), 78.95 ( − O − CH2 − CH(CH2 − O − CH2 − CH = CH2) − O − ), 116.87/117.01 ( − O − CH2 − CH = CH2), 127.70/127.72/128.49/138.46 (Ph−CH2 − O − ), 134.91/135.05 ( − O − CH2 − CH = CH2).
Data availability
All processed data are available in the manuscript or supplementary information. Further NMR data are summarized in Supplementary Data 1.
References
Klein, R. & Wurm, F. R. Aliphatic polyethers: classical polymers for the 21st century. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 36, 1147–1165 (2015).
Herzberger, J. et al. Polymerization of ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, and other alkylene oxides: synthesis, novel polymer architectures, and bioconjugation. Chem. Rev. 116, 2170–2242 (2016).
Nijhuis, T. A., Makkee, M., Moulijn, J. A. & Weckhuysen, B. M. The production of propene oxide: catalytic processes and recent developments. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45, 3447–3459 (2006).
Price, C. C. Polyethers. Acc. Chem. Res. 7, 294–301 (1974).
Penczek, S., Cypryk, M., Duda, A., Kubisa, P. & Słomkowski, S. Living ring-opening polymerizations of heterocyclic monomers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 32, 247–282 (2007).
Grobelny, Z., Matlengiewicz, M., Jurek-Suliga, J., Golba, S. & Skrzeczyna, K. The influence of initiator and macrocyclic ligand on unsaturation and molar mass of poly(propylene oxide)s prepared with various anionic system. Polym. Bull. 75, 1101–1121 (2018).
Pierre, L. E. S. & Price, C. C. The room temperature polymerization of propylene oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 78, 3432–3436 (1956).
Simons, D. M. & Verbanc, J. J. The polymerization of propylene oxide. J. Polym. Sci. 44, 303–311 (1960).
Stolarzewicz, A. A new chain transfer reaction in the anionic polymerization of 2,3‐epoxypropyl phenyl ether and other oxiranes. Makromol. Chem. 187, 745–752 (1986).
Hans, M., Keul, H. & Moeller, M. Chain transfer reactions limit the molecular weight of polyglycidol prepared via alkali metal based initiating systems. Polymer 50, 1103–1108 (2009).
Chen, S., Xu, N. & Shi, J. Structure and properties of polyether polyols catalyzed by Fe/Zn double metal cyanide complex catalyst. Prog. Org. Coat. 49, 125–129 (2004).
Blankenburg, J. et al. The poly(propylene oxide-co-ethylene oxide) gradient is controlled by the polymerization method: determination of reactivity ratios by direct comparison of different copolymerization models. Polym. Chem. 10, 2863–2871 (2019).
Matthes, R., Bapp, C., Wagner, M., Zarbakhsh, S. & Frey, H. Unexpected random copolymerization of propylene oxide with glycidyl methyl ether via double metal cyanide catalysis: introducing polarity in polypropylene oxide. Macromolecules 54, 11228–11237 (2021).
Brocas, A.-L., Mantzaridis, C., Tunc, D. & Carlotti, S. Polyether synthesis: from activated or metal-free anionic ring-opening polymerization of epoxides to functionalization. Prog. Polym. Sci. 38, 845–873 (2013).
Billouard, C., Carlotti, S., Desbois, P. & Deffieux, A. Controlled high-speed anionic polymerization of propylene oxide initiated by alkali metal alkoxide/trialkylaluminum systems. Macromolecules 37, 4038–4043 (2004).
Labbé, A., Carlotti, S., Billouard, C., Desbois, P. & Deffieux, A. Controlled high-speed anionic polymerization of propylene oxide initiated by onium salts in the presence of triisobutylaluminum. Macromolecules 40, 7842–7847 (2007).
Herzberger, J., Leibig, D., Liermann, J. C. & Frey, H. Conventional oxyanionic versus monomer-activated anionic copolymerization of ethylene oxide with glycidyl ethers: striking differences in reactivity ratios. ACS Macro Lett. 5, 1206–1211 (2016).
Chen, Y. et al. High efficiency organic Lewis pair catalyst for ring-opening polymerization of epoxides with chemoselectivity. Macromolecules 51, 8286–8297 (2018).
Morinaga, H., Ujihara, Y., Yamanaka, T., Nagai, D. & Endo, T. Metal-free ring-opening polymerization of glycidyl phenyl ether initiated by tetra-n-butylammonium acetate and its application to the hydroxyl-terminated telechelic polymer. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 49, 4092–4097 (2011).
Boileau, S. & Illy, N. Activation in anionic polymerization: why phosphazene bases are very exciting promoters. Prog. Polym. Sci. 36, 1132–1151 (2011).
Zhao, J., Hadjichristidis, N. & Gnanou, Y. Phosphazene-promoted anionic polymerization. Polimery 59, 49–59 (2014).
Raynaud, J., Ottou, W. N., Gnanou, Y. & Taton, D. Metal-free and solvent-free access to α, ω-heterodifunctionalized poly-(propylene oxide)s by N-heterocyclic carbene-induced ring opening polymerization. Chem. Commun. 46, 3203–3205 (2010).
Naumann, S., Thomas, A. W. & Dove, A. P. N-heterocyclic olefins as organocatalysts for polymerization: preparation of well-defined poly(propylene oxide). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 9550–9554 (2015).
Moins, S. et al. Accelerating effect of crown ethers on the lactide polymerization catalysed by potassium acetate. Catal. Sci. Technol. 11, 4387–4391 (2021).
De Roover, Q., Vucko, T., Vincent, S. P., De Winter, J. & Coulembier, O. Photocontrolled lactide ROP by the light-regulated release of potassium acetate from an azobenzene-bridged crown ether. Catal. Sci. Technol. 11, 6048–6052 (2021).
Fornaciari, C., Pasini, D. & Coulembier, O. Controlled oxyanionic polymerization of propylene oxide: unlocking the molecular-weight limitation by a soft nucleophilic catalysis. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 43, 2200424 (2022).
Saito, T. et al. Alkali metal carboxylate as an efficient and simple catalyst for ring-opening polymerization of cyclic esters. Macromolecules 51, 689–696 (2018).
Takojima, K. et al. Facile synthesis of poly(trimethylene carbonate) by alkali metal carboxylate-catalyzed ring-opening polymerization. Polym. J. 52, 103–110 (2019).
Gao, T. et al. Polyether/polythioether synthesis via ring-opening polymerization of epoxides and episulfides catalyzed by alkali metal carboxylates. Macromolecules 55, 9373–9383 (2022).
Dou, X., Liu, W.-H., Wang, B. & Li, Y.-S. Potassium acetate/18-crown-6 pair: robust and versatile catalyst for synthesis of polyols from ring-opening copolymerization of epoxides and cyclic anhydrides. Chin. J. Chem. 41, 83–92 (2023).
Chen, C. M. et al. Alkali metal carboxylates: simple and versatile initiators for ring-opening alternating copolymerization of cyclic anhydrides/epoxides. Macromolecules 54, 713–724 (2021).
Rastogi, A. K. & St. Pierre, L. E. Copolymerization of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide by anhydrous potassium hydroxide. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 14, 1179–1182 (1970).
Gladovskii, G. A. & Ryzhenkova, Ye. V. Anionic copolymerization reactions of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide. Polym. Sci. USSR 13, 723–730 (1971).
Heatley, F., Yu, G., Booth, C. & Blease, T. G. Determination of reactivity ratios for the anionic copolymerization of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide in bulk. Eur. Polym. J. 27, 573–579 (1991).
Leibig, D., Seiwert, J., Liermann, J. & Frey, H. Copolymerization kinetics of glycidol and ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, and 1,2-butylene oxide: from hyperbranched to multiarm star topology. Macromolecules 49, 7767–7776 (2016).
Lee, J., Han, S., Kim, M. & Kim, B.-S. Anionic polymerization of azidoalkyl glycidyl ethers and post-polymerization modification. Macromolecules 53, 355–366 (2020).
Lee, B. F. et al. Reactivity ratios and mechanistic insight for anionic ring-opening copolymerization of epoxides. Macromolecules 45, 3722–3731 (2012).
Blankenburg, J., Maciol, K., Hahn, C. & Frey, H. Poly(ethylene glycol) with multiple aldehyde functionalities opens up a rich and versatile post-polymerization chemistry. Macromolecules 52, 1785–1793 (2019).
Herzberger, J. et al. Oxidation-responsive and “clickable” Poly(ethylene glycol) via copolymerization of 2-(methylthio)ethyl glycidyl ether. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 9212–9223 (2016).
Ponomarenko, V. A., Khomutov, A. M., Ilchenko, S. J. & lgnatenko, A.V. The effect of substituents of the anionic polymerization of α-oxides. Polym. Sci. USSR 13, 1735–1740 (1971).
Stolarzewicz, A. & Neugebauer, D. Influence of substituent on the polymerization of oxiranes by potassium hydride. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 200, 2467–2470 (1999).
Louai, A., Sarazin, D., Pollet, G., François, J. & Moreaux, F. Properties of ethylene oxide-propylene oxide statistical copolymers in aqueous solution. Polymer 32, 703–712 (1991).
Rudnick, L. R. & Shubkin, R. L. Synthetic Lubricants and High-Performance Functional Fluids 2nd ed, Chemical industries Vol. 77 (Marcel Dekker, 1999).
Chiappetta, D. A. & Sosnik, A. Poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide) block copolymer micelles as drug delivery agents: improved hydrosolubility, stability and bioavailability of drugs. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 66, 303–317 (2007).
Fineman, M. & Ross, S. D. Linear method for determining monomer reactivity ratios in copolymerization. J. Polym. Sci. 5, 259–262 (1959).
Childers, M. I., Longo, J. M., Van Zee, N. J., LaPointe, A. M. & Coates, G. W. Stereoselective epoxide polymerization and copolymerization. Chem. Rev. 114, 8129–8152 (2014).
Rodriguez, C. G., Ferrier, R. C., Helenic, A. & Lynd, N. A. Ring-opening polymerization of epoxides: facile pathway to functional polyethers via a versatile organoaluminum initiator. Macromolecules 50, 3121–3130 (2017).
Akkermans, R. L. C., Spenley, N. A. & Robertson, S. H. COMPASS III: automated fitting workflows and extension to ionic liquids. Mol. Simul. 47, 540–551 (2021).
Job, P. Formation and stability of inorganic complexes in solution. Ann. Chim. 9, 113–203 (1928).
Cowie, J. M. G. 22 Alternating Copolymerization (Specialty Polymers) 383–382 (Springer, 1985).
Pfeifer, S. & Lutz, J.-F. A facile procedure for controlling monomer sequence distribution in radical chain polymerizations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 9542–9543 (2007).
Zamfir, M. & Lutz, J.-F. Ultra-precise insertion of functional monomers in chain-growth polymerizations. Nat. Commun. 3, 1138 (2012).
Montaudo, G., Samperi, F. & Montaudo, M. S. Characterization of synthetic polymers by MALDI-MS. Prog. Polym. Sci. 31, 277–357 (2006).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Istituto Nazionale Previdenza Sociale (INPS, Italy) for a Ph.D. fellowship to C.F., the University of Pavia and MIUR (D.P.) for funding. O.C. is Senior Research Associate for the F.R.S.-FNRS of Belgium and AXA Professor in Chemistry. The authors also acknowledge Prof. Stanisław Penczek and Prof. Stanisław Sosnowski for their useful help with kinetic data interpretation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
O.C. conceived the idea and designed the entire experiment with C.F. and D.P., C.F. synthetized and characterized the polymers. The kinetic data were analyzed and processed by C.F. with the support of O.C., V.L. performed DFT calculations. C.F., V.L., D.P., and O.C. contributed to writing the manuscript and participated in data evaluation and discussions. O.C. and D.P. supervised the project and revised the manuscript. The final version of the manuscript was approved by all authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Chemistry thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Fornaciari, C., Lemaur, V., Pasini, D. et al. Quasi-alternating copolymerization of oxiranes driven by a benign acetate-based catalyst. Commun Chem 6, 235 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-023-01031-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-023-01031-z
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Organomediated polymerization
Communications Chemistry (2024)