Abstract
Real-world samples of graphene often exhibit various types of out-of-plane disorder–ripples, wrinkles and folds–introduced at the stage of growth and transfer processes. These complex out-of-plane defects resulting from the interplay between self-adhesion of graphene and its bending rigidity inevitably lead to the scattering of charge carriers thus affecting the electronic transport properties of graphene. We address the ballistic charge-carrier transmission across the models of out-of-plane defects using tight-binding and density functional calculations while fully taking into account lattice relaxation effects. The observed transmission oscillations in commensurate graphene wrinkles are attributed to the interference between intra- and interlayer transport channels, while the incommensurate wrinkles show vanishing backscattering and retain the transport properties of flat graphene. The suppression of backscattering reveals the crucial role of lattice commensuration in the electronic transmission. Our results provide guidelines to controlling the transport properties of graphene in presence of this ubiquitous type of disorder.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Being the first and the most investigated two-dimensional (2D) material, graphene continues attracting attention as a platform for exploring novel physics and realizing prospective technological applications1,2. The 2D nature of graphene gives rise to soft flexural modes that result in low-energy out-of-plane disorder otherwise absent in bulk, three-dimensional materials3,4,5,6. The interplay between bending upon in-plane compression and the interlayer adhesion results in several distinct types of out-of-plane disorder: ripples, wrinkles and folds (see refs. 3,7 and Fig. 1a, b). The out-of-plane disorder has a prominent effect on the electronic structure and transport properties of graphene8,9,10,11. Finite curvature of the deformed region results in pseudo-gauge fields12,13, while the collapsed regions in wrinkles and folds provide a pathway for electronic tunnelling between layers7,14. In addition, out-of-plane disorder locally accumulates charges and acts as scattering centers7,15,16,17, subsequently having an impact on the operation of graphene-based nanoscale electronic devices14,18,19 as well as electrical characteristics of large-scale graphene samples.
Out-of-plane disorder in graphene may occur for several reasons. For instance, graphene grown using the chemical vapour decomposition (CVD) process develops wrinkles and folds as a result of the thermal contraction of substrate during the cooling stage20,21,22. The out-of-plane disorder may also be introduced during the transfer procedure23,24. Significant efforts have then be devoted to eliminating wrinkles3,21, e.g. by using the substrates with matching thermal expansion coefficients23, strain engineering25 and tailored temperature control protocols21. Experimental studies of the electronic transport in graphene with out-of-plane disorder have also been published7,26. It was proposed that controlled folding of graphene can be used for engineering charge-carrier dynamics27,28,29,30. No question, future applications of graphene in electronics call for a detailed understanding of the effect of this ubiquitous type of disorder on the electronic transport.
In this work, we systematically investigate the electronic transport across wrinkles and folds in graphene using first-principle computations. For commensurate graphene wrinkles, in which the interlayer stacking corresponds to the energetically favorable Bernal stacking configuration, we find that the electronic transmission oscillates over wide energy ranges. The observed oscillation patterns are attributed to quantum interference between the inter- and intralayer transport channels. In incommensurate wrinkles and folds, the mismatch between the layers is found to suppresses the interlayer tunneling resulting in transmission probabilities close to the limit of flat, pristine graphene.
Results
Construction of models
The atomistic models of graphene with out-of-plane disorder considered in our work are defined by a compressive displacement of length ΔW (see Fig. 1a) forming a wrinkle or a fold along crystallographic vector v = (a, b). The considered configurations are thus assumed to be periodic along v. The interplay between the bending energy and attractive interlayer interactions of graphene layers define the evolution across the three types of out-of-plane disorder realized upon increasing ΔW as shown in Fig. 1b. While ripples are formed at small ΔW, interlayer attraction collapses such structures to wrinkles for larger values of ΔW, and further increase of ΔW leads to folds, in which the contact area between graphene layers is further increased. Extremities of wrinkles and folds have loop-like structures free of interlayer coupling7. In our work, we focus on the latter two types of out-of-plane defects since it is the interlayer coupling between graphene layers that is expected to have strong effects on the electronic transport. All atomistic models of wrinkles and folds considered in our work have been constructed with the help of classical force-field relaxation (see the Methods section for details).
Electronic transport across commensurate wrinkles
We first consider the special case of wrinkles defined by v = (1, 0) and v = (1, 1), referring to them as zigzag and armchair, respectively. The collapsed regions of such wrinkles are compatible with the energetically favorable Bernal interlayer stacking configuration31,32,33,34, and hence referred to as commensurate in the rest of our paper. For these relaxed models, we calculated ballistic charge-carrier transmission from first principles, using the combination of density functional theory (DFT) and the non-equilibrium Green’s function formalism implemented in the TranSIESTA package35,36 (see Methods). The results of DFT calculations are discussed in comparison with the tight-binding (TB) approximation calculations employing the Slater-Koster formalism7,37 (see the Supplementary Information document as well as the Methods section for the details on methodology). Figure 2a–d present the ballistic transmission T(E, k//) for the models of zigzag wrinkles defined by ΔW = 40, 60, 120 and 240 Å as a function of energy E and momentum parallel to the wrinkle k//. Furthermore, each panel shows transmission T(E) plotted at a specific k//= ± 2π/(3a0) (a0 = 2.46 Å is the lattice constant of graphene), which corresponds to the momentum of projections of the Dirac cone band degeneracies. The ballistic transmissions T(E, k//) describes single scattering events on periodic wrinkles or folds. Converting these result into measurable values of conductance requires the knowledge of the device width W. Conductance per transmission channel G(k//, E) is given by G(k//, E) = T(k//, E)G0, where the conductance quantum G0 = 2e2/h = 7.748 × 10−5 S, including spin degeneracy. The total conductance G(E) is given by a summation over momenta k// permitted by the Born-von Karman boundary conditions: G(E) = ∑iG0T(ki, E), with ki = i ⋅ 2π/(W/a). This conductance corresponds to charge-carrier energy E and is calculated in the zero-bias limit.
There are two striking observations in the presented transmission plots. Firstly, both in DFT and TB results, we observe a pronounced electron-hole asymmetry in the charge-carrier transmission. The electron-hole asymmetry has an origin in the interlayer stacking of zigzag wrinkles. The collapsed region assumes Bernal stacking configurations AB\({}_{1}^{{\prime} }\) or AB\({}_{2}^{{\prime} }\)38, as illustrated in Fig. 1c, in which one of the graphene sublattices couples to itself upon folding since the two layers are mirror-symmetric with respect to each other. Such a coupling breaks the sublattice symmetry and hence the electron-hole symmetry39,40.
Secondly, ballistic transmission T(E, k//) shows pronounced oscillations over broad energy ranges. Apart from making transmission highly energy-dependent, such oscillations also affect average conductance at a finite bias. The oscillations are clearly visible in the side panels of Fig. 2a–d that show transmission at a fixed momentum k// = 2π/(3a0) that corresponds to the projections of the Dirac points. Further analysis shows that the energy separation ΔE between the peaks has an approximately linear dependence on ΔW (Fig. 2e). Such a dependence is the signature of the interference between the interlayer and intralayer transport channels, as found by some of us previously in the case of the electromechanical response of bilayer graphene14. The underlying mechanism is further addressed in Section. We would also like to point out that similar transport phenomena dominated by interlayer tunneling have also been observed in break-junction systems41,42.
The second family of investigated commensurate configurations is defined by v = (1, 1), that is wrinkles are oriented along the armchair direction. Atomic relaxation effects are more complex in such wrinkles. Unlike in the zigzag case, realizing the lowest-energy Bernal stacking is possible only at a cost of introducing a shear deformation as shown in Fig. 3a. Consequently, the Bernal stacking is not achieved at small values of ΔW, and the collapsed region assumes the saddle-point (SP) stacking configuration43 that does not break sublattice symmetry. Figure 3b presents the evolution of shear deformation Δy upon the change of ΔW with \({\Delta }_{y}={a}_{0}/(2\sqrt{3})\) representing the pure Bernal stacking configuration. Figure 3c–d present the transmission maps for the armchair wrinkles with ΔW = 40 Å and ΔW = 120 Å. In the case of v = (1, 1), the Dirac points are projected onto k// = 0. Similar to the case of zigzag wrinkles, oscillations with the ΔE ∝ 1/ΔW period are observed in the transmission maps. The oscillation pattern is more regular than in the case of ΔW = 40 Å armchair wrinkle, which assumes the SP stacking and hence preserves electron-hole symmetry. In contrast, the ΔW = 120 Å wrinkle is significantly closer to the Bernal stacking (see Fig. 3b) and the electron-hole symmetry appears to be well visible in this case.
Conductance oscillations in the atomic chain model
In order to further address the physical mechanism underlying the conductance oscillations observed in both the zigzag and armchair wrinkles, we introduce a simple one-dimensional model treated using the tight-binding approximation. The presence of interlayer conductance channels is defined by ΔW, and also l that represents the absence of interlayer hopping in the loop-like region as shown in Fig. 4a. At the same time, we observe that k// does not have any significant effect on the oscillation period, hence we introduce a one-dimensional chain described using the nearest-neighbor tight-binding model with an extra hopping \({t}^{{\prime} }\) that models interlayer coupling in graphene wrinkles. Schematic diagram of this model with hopping \({t}^{{\prime} }\) represented by a rainbow-like graph is shown in Fig. 4b. The ratio of the newly introduced hopping \({t}^{{\prime} }\) to the nearest-neighbor hopping t is chosen to resemble that of graphene wrinkles t′/t = 0.48 eV/−2.7 eV7,33. Figure 4c shows transmission T as a function of energy E at a fixed ΔW=12 in units of intersite distance, while parameter l is varied. We observe that oscillation peaks have the same positions, which indicates that l is of little effect on the oscillation period. Combined with the results of DFT calculations we conclude that the oscillations are defined by the largest path difference ΔW. We further analyze the transmission oscillations in the atomic chain model using the non-equilibrium Green’s functions (NEGF) approach, in which hoppings \({t}^{{\prime} }\) are treated as a perturbative correction to the transmission.
First, we define an infinite atomic chain with the Hamiltonian
where ci\(({c}_{i}^{{\dagger} })\) is the annihilation (creation) operator on the ith site. This Hamiltonian commutes with the translation operator, thus the energy eigenstates are also momentum eigenstates.
In the NEGF formalism44,45, the transmission is calculated as
where G is the Green’s function G(E)=[E−H−Σ]−1. The coupling matrices Γi are given by Γi=\(i({\Sigma }_{i}-{\Sigma }_{i}^{{\dagger} })\), with Σi being the self-energies of the two semi-infinite leads.
Green’s function G0 describes the chain in absence of \({t}^{{\prime} }\), while adding coupling \({t}^{{\prime} }\) that models interlayer coupling in wrinkles adds an additional term
The Green’s function is then
Keeping only the first order of correction G0ΔhG0, the transmission becomes
The Green’s function can be written as an expansion involving eigenstates \(\left\vert {\psi }_{n}\right\rangle\) of the chain with no hoppings \({t}^{{\prime} }\)
and the correction term G0ΔhG0 becomes
As the simplest case, we analyze the En = Em correction G0ΔhG0 = 〈ψn∣Δh∣ψm〉G0 that gives an Ei-dependent prefactor to the Green’s function. We write the factor as a function δ(E) as
The leading order of transmission correction is Γ1(G0 + G0ΔhG0)Γ2(G0 + G0ΔhG0)], hence the correction to transmission contains δ2 + 4δ + 1.
We then evaluate the correction δ(E), keeping in mind that the eigenstates of the pristine chain
are also momentum eigenstates. The correction factor δ represents the phase difference between wavefunctions
connected by the additional hoppings \({t}^{{\prime} }\). It can then be approximated by a sum of sinusoidal functions
The results of the summation shown in Fig. 4d suggests that the highest-frequency component in Eq. (11), which corresponds to the interference path ΔW, defines the oscillation peaks. Our first-principles results are consistent with the conclusions of this simple model.
Transport across incommensurate wrinkles
We will now discuss graphene wrinkles formed along general crystallographic directions v = (a, b) other than high-symmetry zigzag and armchair orientations. In these cases, the collapsed region locally forms twisted bilayer graphene with matching vectors (a, b) and (b, a). The resulting twist angle is
while the translational vector along the wrinkle has a length of \(d=\sqrt{{a}^{2}+{b}^{2}+ab}\).
We discuss the effect of wrinkle direction (a, b) on the transmission T(E, k//). Translational vector (a, b) defines a one-dimensional mini Brillouin zone (mBZ) obtained by projecting the 2D Brillouin zone of graphene onto the k// direction in momentum space. The Dirac cones of graphene are projected onto either k// = 0 (class Ia) or k// = 2π/(3∣v∣) (class Ib) of the mBZ according to the classification introduced in ref. 46. Class Ia is defined by \(| a-b| \,{{\mathrm{mod}}}\,\,3=0\), class Ib otherwise. The projections of the Dirac cones define the regions in the T(E, k//) maps where transmission is allowed and limited by n conductance channels in case of n-fold degeneracy of bands at given E and k// in the ballistic regime.
The periodic structure of wrinkles results in consequences deeper than just the conservation of momentum k// upon ballistic transmission. We stress that semi-infinite graphene sheets on both sides of wrinkles of constant width have the same crystallographic orientation. The momentum conservation implies suppressed backscattering at the Dirac point, which can be observed by evaluating contribution to the transmission from the first-order correction G0ΔhG0. Starting with the pristine graphene and a simple interlayer containing only hopping between aligned atoms
the effective ΔG writes
which becomes most significant at Em = En = z. Recalling the fact that \(\left\vert {\psi }_{m}\right\rangle\) and \(\left\vert {\psi }_{n}\right\rangle\) are eigenstates of pristine graphene, 〈ψm∣Δh∣ψn〉 gives an \(\exp (2\pi i({{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{m}-{{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{n})\cdot {{{{\bf{r}}}}}_{ij})\) term. Integrating over rij, ΔG vanishes if km ≠ kn, while the wrinkle enforces a transformation \({{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{m}={{{{\mathcal{M}}}}}_{x}{{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{n}\) due to its mirror-symmetric stacking configuration of the two layers as shown in Fig. 5a–c. Here, \({{{{\mathcal{M}}}}}_{x}\) denotes the mirror-reflection with respect to transport direction x: \({{{{\mathcal{M}}}}}_{x}({k}_{x},{k}_{y})=(-{k}_{x},{k}_{y})\). From the above rules of momentum conservation, we conclude that the transmission is only affected in the overlapping region of the Dirac cones. In the non-overlapping region, the correction G0ΔhG0 is vanishing, and the transmission retains the value of ideal, defect-free graphene. These results are verified by the explicit DFT transport calculations as shown in Fig. 5d–e for class Ia and class Ib wrinkles, respectively. The transmission maps T(E, k//) have overall shape of the Dirac cone projections. Transmission values near the charge neutrality are T≈2 and T≈1 for class Ia and Ib configurations, respectively, indicating that interlayer tunnelling plays a minor role. At higher energies where the Dirac cones overlap, e.g. near E≈2 eV in Fig. 5e, backscattering becomes significant leading to a series of transmission dips. We also point out that class Ia presents larger backscattering from the interlayer coupling since the projected Dirac cones overlap with each other.
Transport across graphene folds
We will now discuss folds as the ultimate regime of out-of-plane disorder in graphene. Folds realize triple-layer graphene configurations in their collapsed regions (Fig. 6a–c). Importantly, adjacent layers (pairs 1–2 and 2–3) in incommensurate folds are twisted with respect to each other, while the outside layers 1 and 3 are aligned. This configuration is equivalent to mirror-symmetric twisted trilayer graphene. While we still expect the effect of interlayer coupling to be weakened by the incommensuration, our DFT calculations predict a larger degree of backscattering in folds than in wrinkles (compare Figs. 5e and 6d for the (1,2) direction). For the folded region of width lf = 40 Å, the average transmission in the energy interval (−0.15 eV, 0.15 eV) is 0.727, while in the wrinkle of equivalent ΔW = 80 Å it is 0.908. The observed transport behaviour raises the question of whether the enhanced backscattering in incommensurate folds as compared to wrinkles originates from the direct coupling of the outmost layers 1 and 3. The corresponding matrix elements of the Hamiltonian in localized-basis-set first-principles calculations35,47, are found to be negligible. The estimated Slater-Koster coupling also has a negligible magnitude of 10−4 eV. Therefore, we attribute the enhanced scattering to the fact that the number of interlayer tunneling channels is doubled in the folds. As expected, for a commensurate zigzag fold (Fig. 6d) we observe strong backscattering with transmission magnitudes lower than in the equivalent zigzag wrinkles (Fig. 2).
Discussion
We investigated the effect of out-of-plane disorder on the electronic transmission in graphene. Different forms of out-of-plane disorder exist in graphene, depending on the compressive displacement and the orientation of the deformation. Our work addressed ballistic transmission through the wrinkles and folds using first-principle calculations, taking into account their width and interlayer commensuration.
The interlayer coupling was found to cause substantial oscillations in the electronic transmission across commensurate wrinkles. Such oscillations were found to originate from the quantum interference involving the interlayer tunneling channels. Based on DFT calculations, we propose a simple one-dimensional model that fully captures the observed oscillations. On the other hand, in incommensurate, “twisted” wrinkles the interlayer coupling is effectively weaker, and the transmission near the Fermi level preserves that of pristine, flat graphene. We have also found enhanced backscattering in folds that was attributed to the doubled contact region in this type of out-of-plane disorder.
Even though our work focuses on understanding physical mechanisms underlying a single event of ballistic transmission across out-of-plane defects in graphene, these results can be translated to mesoscopic properties resulting from multiple scattering events, e.g. electronic transport in diffusive and localization regimes. This allows to apply use the results of our work to samples and devices of diverse morphologies of the out-of-plane disorder. Furthermore, same knowledge can be used for breeding ideas of novel devices based on new operating regimes, e.g. exploiting the combination of the discussed interference phenomena and electromechanical coupling. One example of such a electromechanical phenomenon was discussed by us previously14, and we believe our work will stimulate further efforts in this direction.
As a generalization, the principles presented in our work are expected to apply also to other types of 2D materials. Formation of locally twisted bilayers in the wrinkles and folds provides an interesting outlook for further studies, e.g. of “twisted” wrinkles in the smaller-angle regime. Even though explicitly addressing the small-angle regime is challenging for standard DFT calculations, we can still anticipate transport properties at small angles. One important aspect is the presence of significant lattice relaxation in bilayer graphene at small twist angles33. This relaxation drives incommensurate stacking into the lattice of Bernal stacked AB and BA domains, and hence the emergence of scattering associated with commensurate configurations discussed in our work. Another important aspect is the development of band gaps between the flat-band manifold and remote bands, which is another consequence of lattice relaxation, and the emergence of correlated insulator states at low temperatures at the magic angle and at specific charge-carrier densities48. Both effects would contribute to the development of transport gaps. We anticipate that transmission across wrinkles and folds characterized by small twists inherits transport properties of both commensurate and incommensurate configurations.
Methods
Structure relaxation with classical force fields
The atomic structures of models of the out-of-plane disorder in graphene were obtained by means of the classical force field simulations using LAMMPS49,50. The classical force field includes the bond-order potential for describing covalent bonding51 as well as the modified version of the Kolmogorov-Crespi registry-dependent potential52 for describing the interlayer van der Waals interactions. The energy minimization was performed using the conjugate-gradient and fire algorithms.
The tight-binding model calculations
In order to describe both the interlayer coupling and the effect of curvature in the tight-binding calculations of graphene with out-of-plane disorder, we employ the Slater-Koster model7,37. The pz atomic orbitals of carbon atoms form the intralayer π bonds and the interlayer σ bonds. The general form of the Hamiltonian including both contributions is
Explicit expressions for the hoppings \({t}_{\pi }^{ij}\) and \({t}_{\sigma }^{ij}\) are7
Following the previous7 Slater-Koster parametrization, we set \({V}_{\pi }^{0}=-2.7\) eV, \({V}_{\sigma }^{0}=0.48\) eV, characteristic distances a0 = 1.42 Å, d0 = 3.35 Å and the decay length r0 = 0.184a (\(a=\sqrt{3}{a}_{0}=2.46\) Å as defined in the main text). In the orientation-dependent terms, angles θi and θj are defined as the angle between rij and the local normal vector at atomic positions ri and rj, that is θi = \(\angle\)(rij, ni). These terms accounts for the effect that the local curvature of graphene sheet on the overlap between pz orbitals.
Recursive Green’s function methods
The ballistic transmission was calculated using the non-equilibrium Green’s function methods in both the TB model and DFT calculations. The transmission probability is expressed as
where G is the Green’s function \(G={[{G}_{0}-\Sigma ]}^{-1}\). The Γ matrices contains the self-energy terms of the two leads
The self-energy from the ith lead is calculated as \({\Sigma }_{i}={h}_{i}{G}_{i}{h}_{i}^{{\dagger} }\), where hi is the coupling matrix between the lead and the scattering region. For each of the semi-infinite leads, Green’s function Gi is obtained through the recursive Green’s function methods. In each step one layer is added to the lead, and the Green’s function iterates as gj=\({[E-h-T{g}_{j-1}{T}^{{\dagger} }]}^{-1}\). Gi is taken as the converged value of g, that is \({G}_{i}={g}_{j}^{j\to \infty }\).
First-principles electronic transport calculations
First-principles transport calculations were performed with TranSIESTA package35,36. We used the double-ζ plus polarization basis set combined with the local density approximation exchange-correlation functional53. The energy shift for constructing the localized basis was set to 275 meV, and the real-space cutoff to 250 Ry. The estimation of the direct coupling between the top and bottom layers in graphene folds was extracted from the localized basis set Hamiltonian using the sisl package47.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study can be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.
Code availability
The structural optimization and DFT calculations were performed using the publicly accessible codes LAMMPS and TranSIESTA. The routines for generating the wrinkle configurations and for performing the electronic transport calculations within the tight-binding approximation can be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.
References
Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S. & Geim, A. K. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109–162 (2009).
Novoselov, K. S. et al. A roadmap for graphene. Nature 490, 192–200 (2012).
Deng, B. et al. Wrinkle-Free Single-Crystal Graphene Wafer Grown on Strain-Engineered Substrates. ACS Nano 11, 12337–12345 (2017).
Mariani, E. & von Oppen, F. Flexural Phonons in Free-Standing Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 076801 (2008).
Croy, A. Bending rigidities and universality of flexural modes in 2D crystals. J. Phys. Mater. 3, 02lt03 (2020).
de Lima, A. L. et al. Soliton instability and fold formation in laterally compressed graphene. Nanotechnology 26, 045707 (2015).
Zhu, W. et al. Structure and electronic transport in graphene wrinkles. Nano Lett. 12, 3431–3436 (2012).
Hattab, H. et al. Interplay of wrinkles, strain, and lattice parameter in graphene on iridium. Nano Lett. 12, 678–682 (2012).
Xie, Y., Chen, Y., Wei, X. L. & Zhong, J. Electron transport in folded graphene junctions. Phys. Rev. B 86, 195426 (2012).
Pelc, M., Jaskólski, W., Ayuela, A. & Chico, L. Topologically confined states at corrugations of gated bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 92, 085433 (2015).
Kang, Y. et al. The role of nanowrinkles in mass transport across graphene-based membranes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2003159 (2020).
Vozmediano, M. A. H., de Juan, F. & Cortijo, A. Gauge fields and curvature in graphene. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 129, 012001 (2008).
Ortolani, L. et al. Folded graphene membranes: mapping curvature at the nanoscale. Nano Lett. 12, 5207 (2012).
Benameur, M. M. et al. Electromechanical oscillations in bilayer graphene. Nat. Commun. 6, 8582 (2015).
Guo, Y. & Guo, W. Electronic and field emission properties of wrinkled graphene. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 692470 (2013).
Pereira, V. M., Castro Neto, A. H., Liang, H. Y. & Mahadevan, L. Geometry, mechanics, and electronics of singular structures and wrinkles in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 156603 (2010).
Nakajima, H. et al. Imaging of local structures affecting electrical transport properties of large graphene sheets by lock-in thermography. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau3407 (2019).
Katsnelson, M. I. & Prokhorova, M. F. Zero-energy states in corrugated bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 77, 205424 (2008).
Zhang, J. & Fahrenthold, E. P. Conductance of Buckled N = 5 Armchair graphene nanoribbons. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 1378 (2020).
Deng, S. & Berry, V. Wrinkled, rippled and crumpled graphene: an overview of formation mechanism, electronic properties, and applications. Materials Today 19, 197–212 (2016).
Wang, M. et al. Single-crystal, large-area, fold-free monolayer graphene. Nature 596, 519–524 (2021).
Pan, Z., Liu, N., Fu, L. & Liu, Z. Wrinkle engineering: a new approach to massive graphene nanoribbon arrays. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 17578–17581 (2011).
Lanza, M. et al. Tuning graphene morphology by substrate towards wrinkle-free devices: Experiment and simulation. J. Appl. Phys. 113, 104301 (2013).
Liu, N. et al. The origin of wrinkles on transferred graphene. Nano Res. 4, 996–1004 (2011).
Hu, H., Xia, K., Zhao, S., Ma, M. & Zheng, Q. Eliminating graphene wrinkles by strain engineering. Extreme Mech. Lett. 42, 101104 (2021).
Ma, R.-S. et al. Wrinkle-induced highly conductive channels in graphene on SiO2/Si substrates. Nanoscale 12, 12038–12045 (2020).
Fan, X. et al. Spontaneous folding growth of graphene on h-BN. Nano Lett. 21, 2033–2039 (2021).
Rode, J. C. et al. Linking interlayer twist angle to geometrical parameters of self-assembled folded graphene structures. 2D Mater. 6, 015021 (2018).
Luo, D. et al. Folding and fracture of single-crystal graphene grown on a Cu(111) foil. Adv. Mater. 34, 2110509 (2022).
Yang, L.-Z. et al. Origami-controlled strain engineering of tunable flat bands and correlated states in folded graphene. Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, L041001 (2022).
Lipson, H. S. & Stokes, A. The structure of graphite. Proc. R. Soc. A 181, 101–105 (1942).
Butz, B. et al. Dislocations in bilayer graphene. Nature 505, 533–537 (2014).
Gargiulo, F. & Yazyev, O. V. Structural and electronic transformation in low-angle twisted bilayer graphene. 2D Mater. 5, 015019 (2017).
Ni, M.-Y. & Wakabayashi, K. Stacking sequence dependence of electronic properties in double-layer graphene heterostructures. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 53, 06JD03 (2014).
Soler, J. M. et al. The SIESTA method for ab initio order-N materials simulation. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 2745–2779 (2002).
Stokbro, K., Taylor, J., Brandbyge, M. & Ordejón, P. TranSIESTA: a spice for molecular electronics. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1006, 212–226 (2003).
Slater, J. C. & Koster, G. F. Simplified LCAO method for the periodic potential problem. Phys. Rev. 94, 1498–1524 (1954).
Gilbert, S. M. et al. Alternative stacking sequences in hexagonal boron nitride. 2D Materials 6, 021006 (2019).
Sasaki, K.-I., Murakami, S. & Saito, R. Gauge field for edge state in graphene. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75, 074713 (2006).
Semenoff, G. W. Chiral symmetry breaking in graphene. Physica Scripta T146, 014016 (2012).
Caneva, S. et al. Mechanically controlled quantum interference in graphene break junctions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 1126–1131 (2018).
Tang, Y. et al. Electric field-induced assembly in single-stacking terphenyl junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 19101–19109 (2020).
San-Jose, P., Gorbachev, R. V., Geim, A. K., Novoselov, K. S. & Guinea, F. Stacking boundaries and transport in bilayer graphene. Nano Lett. 14, 2052–2057 (2014).
Gargiulo, F. & Yazyev, O. V. Topological aspects of charge-carrier transmission across grain boundaries in graphene. Nano Lett. 14, 250–254 (2014).
Büttiker, M. Four-terminal phase-coherent conductance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1761–1764 (1986).
Yazyev, O. V. & Louie, S. G. Electronic transport in polycrystalline graphene. Nat. Mater. 9, 806–809 (2010).
Papior N., sisl: v 0.12.3, https://zenodo.org/records/8406433.
Cao, Y. et al. Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 80–84 (2018).
LAMMPS Molecular dynamics simulator, https://www.lammps.org.
Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).
Los, J. H. & Fasolino, A. Intrinsic long-range bond-order potential for carbon: Performance in Monte Carlo simulations of graphitization. Phys. Rev. B 68, 024107 (2003).
Kolmogorov, A. N. & Crespi, V. H. Registry-dependent interlayer potential for graphitic systems. Phys. Rev. B 71, 235415 (2005).
Perdew, J. P. & Zunger, A. Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems. Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048–5079 (1981).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant No. 172543). Computations were performed at the Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS) under project No. s1146 and the facilities of the Scientific IT and Application Support Center of EPFL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.G. performed calculations, analyzed results and wrote the manuscript. O.V.Y. proposed and supervised the project.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Guan, Y., Yazyev, O.V. Electronic transport in graphene with out-of-plane disorder. npj 2D Mater Appl 8, 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-023-00437-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-023-00437-6
- Springer Nature Limited