Abstract
Smoking of classic cigarettes has been well-established as a health risk factor, including cardiovascular, neurological, and pulmonary diseases. Adverse effects on human reproduction have also been shown. Smokers are assumed to have a significantly lower chance of pregnancy, however, the impact of smoking on medically assisted reproduction (MAR) treatment outcomes is controversial. Moreover, smoking habits have changed during the last decades since e-cigarettes and hookahs, or water pipes, have become very popular, yet little is known regarding vaping or hookah-smoking patients undergoing MAR treatments. This prospective study aimed to examine the presence of benzo[a]pyrene, nicotine, and its main metabolite, cotinine, in human follicular fluid (FF) in non-smoking, smoking, and vaping/hookah-smoking patients and to evaluate the impact on female fertility. Human FF samples were collected from 320 women subjected to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles due to male subfertility. Gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry was used to analyse the presence of benzo[a]pyrene, nicotine, and cotinine. A questionnaire was provided to assess patient consumption behaviour and to identify (1) non-smoking patients, (2) patients who consumed cigarettes, and (3) patients with exclusive consumption of e-cigarettes or hookahs. Data were analysed using linear and logistic regression, Fisher’s exact test, and the Mann–Whitney U Test. Nicotine was present in 22 (6.8%) and cotinine in 65 (20.3%) of the 320 samples. The nicotine and cotinine concentrations per sample ranged from 0 to 26.3 ng/ml and 0–363.0 ng/ml, respectively. Benzo[a]pyrene was not detectable in any of the samples analysed. Nicotine and cotinine were also present in the FF of patients with exclusive consumption of e-cigarettes or hookahs. The clinical pregnancy rate, fertilization and maturation rates, and number of oocytes per oocyte pick-up were not statistically significantly different between non-smoking, smoking, or vaping/hookah-smoking patients. Smoking and the accumulation of smoking toxins in the FF have no impact on the outcome of MAR treatments—neither the clinical pregnancy rate, maturation and fertilization rates, nor the number of retrieved oocytes were affected. For the first time, nicotine and cotinine were quantified in the FF of patients exclusively vaping e-cigarettes or smoking hookahs. Since vaping liquids and hookah tobaccos contain potentially harmful substances, other adverse effects cannot be excluded.
Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03414567.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Smoking, a well-established risk factor for general health, is linked to cardiovascular, neurological, and pulmonary diseases1,2,3. Adverse effects on human reproduction have been reported in the last decades, including a significantly higher risk of preterm birth, miscarriage, and malformations, as well as reduced implantation and live birth rates4,5,6,7. Similar effects have been described for passive smokers8,9. Overall, smokers exhibit a significantly lower likelihood of achieving a successful pregnancy4,10.
The burning of tobacco products and additives, such as menthol, glycerine, and sorbic acid, produces more than 4000 chemicals—many of which have neurotoxic and carcinogenic characteristics11,12,13. Known neurotoxic substances include nicotine and cotinine, its main metabolite14,15. Due to its toxic characteristics, nicotine is classified as ‘acute toxic’ according to European Chemical Agency (ECHA) with an oral toxicity LC50 (lethal concentration) of 3.3 mg nicotine per kg body weight for mice and an acute inhalation toxicity of 2.3 mg nicotine/L for 20 min for rats. For humans, acute toxicity estimates (ATE) were 3.3 mg per kg body weight for acute oral toxicity and 0.25 mg/L for acute inhalation toxicity65. Nicotine is mainly metabolised by different liver enzymes including flavin-containing monooxygenase, Cytochrome P450 2A6 oxidase system, or UDP-glucuronosyltransferase into more than 20 (intermediate) metabolites and primarily excreted in the urine18,66. In humans, on average 70–80% of nicotine is metabolised through the cotinine pathway66. The half-life of nicotine is about two hours in body fluids, while cotinine has a half-life of around 16 h16,17,18. Thus, cotinine is the most widely used biomarker of nicotine intake.
Additionally, the incomplete combustion of tobacco products produces the carcinogen benzo[a]pyrene19,20. The long-term and immediate effects of nicotine and benzo[a]pyrene exposure on female reproduction have been explored using human cell lines, different animal models including rodents and Rhesus monkeys, and in clinical studies. The effect of nicotine is to lower progesterone levels by inhibiting the progesterone synthesis and by reduction of cell growth, to limit oestrogen biosynthesis, to decrease peripheral blood flow, and to impair fallopian tube and uterus contractility21,22,23,67,68,69. Benzo[a]pyrene hampers cell proliferation and oestrogen biosynthesis and is linked to DNA damage24,25.
Besides classic cigarette smoking, consumption of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and smoking of water pipes or hookahs have increased rapidly in recent years and are popular among adolescent males and females26,27. In 2021, more than 82 million people worldwide were estimated to be regularly consuming e-cigarettes26. Since heating, combustion, and inhalation are different compared with smoking classic cigarettes, many consumers particularly regard e-cigarettes as an alternative to classic cigarette consumption. However, e-cigarette vaping liquids, even nicotine-free ones, may affect health and human reproduction, especially since vaping liquids, hookah tobacco, and aerosols contain several potentially harmful substances, including glycerine, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, methylglyoxal, benzaldehyde, and endocrine-disrupting chemicals like phthalates or polybrominated diphenyl ethers, respectively28,29,30,31,32,70. Overall, the effects of exposure to e-cigarette vapours and hookah smoking on human reproduction are poorly understood.
The influence of smoking on the outcomes of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) treatments has been studied and debated for over 40 years; however, the current literature affords controversial results. While some studies reported adverse effects for smokers at different levels33,34,35, others found no correlation between smoking and MAR outcomes36,37,38. However, quality and quantity of smoking differ individually and must be taken into account when assessing the influence of smoking on the outcome of MAR treatment. Nicotine, cotinine, or benzo[a]pyrene accumulation in ovarian tissue or follicular fluid (FF) has not been sufficiently investigated, particularly their effects on MAR treatment outcomes8,38,39,40. Data regarding the consumption of e-cigarettes and smoking of water pipes or hookahs, to the best of our knowledge, have not been reported as yet.
In this prospective study, gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC–MS) was used to analyse nicotine, cotinine, and benzo[a]pyrene accumulation in the FF of patients undergoing ICSI treatment. Patient consumption behaviour was assessed via a questionnaire to identify i) non-smoking patients, ii) patients who consumed classic cigarettes, and iii) patients with exclusive consumption of e-cigarettes or hookahs. The data were used to analyse the impact of smoking/vaping products in the FF on MAR outcomes.
Material and methods
Study population
Our study population in this prospective cohort study comprised 320 women subjected to ICSI treatment due to male subfertility. All men included had reduced semen parameters (oligozoospermia, asthenozoospermia and/or teratozoospermia) according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for examination and processing of human semen71. Women presenting endometriosis or polycystic ovaries were excluded. Human FF samples were collected during oocyte pick-up (OPU) at the Fertility Center Dortmund (Germany) from 2018 to 2023. Written informed consent was given by all patients before MAR treatment. The ethics committee of the University of Witten/Herdecke reviewed and approved the study (#193/2017; Germany). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
The following parameters were assessed: serum oestradiol concentration (E2; pg/ml); Anti-Müllerian hormone level (AMH; ng/ml); gonadotropin dosage for ovarian stimulation (International units, IU); the numbers of oocytes retrieved, metaphase II (MII) oocytes, oocytes without pronuclei (0PN), one pronucleus (1PN), two (2PN), or more than two pronuclei (≥ 3PN); day of embryo transfer; number of transferred embryos; presence of a clinical pregnancy demonstrated by ultrasound (intrauterine cavity); age; and body mass index (BMI). Serum oestradiol concentrations and Anti-Müllerian hormone levels were analysed with immunoassay Atellica IM 1300 (Siemens Healthcare) platform.
The clinical pregnancy rate is the number of clinical pregnancies per number of OPUs. The oocyte maturation rate is the number of MII oocytes per number of retrieved oocytes. The fertilisation rate is the number of 2PN per number of MII oocytes.
A multiple-choice questionnaire was provided to evaluate the quality and quantity of consumer behaviour. Patients were divided into three groups: (1) non-smoking patients, (2) patients with consumption of classic cigarettes (with or without additional consumption of e-cigarettes and/or hookahs), and (3) patients with exclusive consumption of e-cigarettes and/or hookahs (without additional consumption of classic cigarettes).
Sample collection and chemical analysis
All samples were collected during routine MAR treatment. Cumulus-oocyte complex aspiration was performed by ultrasound-guided OPU72. Oocytes underwent processing for further ICSI treatment73. The remaining FF (including cellular debris) without cumulus-oocyte complexes were directly transferred to sterile glass tubes and frozen at − 20 °C immediately. FF collection was limited to the first two follicles punctured.
Frozen samples were adjusted to room temperature before workup. All samples were spiked with nicotine-13CD3, cotinine-D3, and benzo[a]pyrene-D12 as internal standards. Samples were alkalised with 25% ammonium hydroxide to pH 10–11, extracted using chloroform, and evaporated at 45 °C in an N2 atmosphere. The residue was taken up in acetonitrile before performing GC–MS analysis on a nonpolar phase. For quantification, different concentrations of nicotine, cotinine, and benzo[a]pyrene standard solutions were prepared to ascertain their respective limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ).
GC–MS was carried out with the Agilent 8890 Gas Chromatograph system combined with an Agilent 5977B mass spectrometer. Compounds were separated on Agilent HP-5 ms Ultra Inert capillary columns (15 m, 0.25 mm id 0.25 µm film thickness) with a 0.5 µl injection volume. Retention times, target, and qualifier ions for all analytes are shown in Supplementary Table I. To ensure quality control, each measurement included standard solutions of known concentrations, solvent blanks, and samples of all reagents used. To control for any contamination during the sampling process or storage, all medical devices and vessels were analysed for any distorting substances before initiating the study.
Statistics
This study was designed to assess the hypothesis that smoking of classic cigarettes or consumption of e-cigarettes and/or hookahs will negatively correlate with the outcome of a MAR treatment. The primary endpoint of this study is the clinical pregnancy rate per OPU. Patient base characteristics and clinical history include female and male ages (years), BMI (kg/m2), serum oestradiol concentration (pg/ml), AMH (ng/ml), gonadotropin dosage for ovarian stimulation (IU), previous OPU cycles, day of embryo transfer, and number of transferred embryos, which are presented as means ± standard deviations (SD). Statistical analysis of patient base characteristics and clinical history was conducted with the Mann–Whitney U Test. Clinical parameters are presented as means with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) using Fisher's exact test and the Mann–Whitney U Test. The concentrations of nicotine, cotinine, and benzo[a]pyrene are presented as means ± SD in ng/ml FF. Distributions of all analyte concentrations were verified with the Shapiro–Wilk test. For correlation analyses of two variables, single linear regression models including the correlation coefficient r and ANOVA test were applied. For multiple linear regression analyses, the coefficient of determination R2 and ANOVA test were used. Single and multinomial binary logistic regression models were applied to test for FF contamination levels and clinical pregnancy rates per OPU, including Nagelkerke R-square (RN2), Goodness of fit test, odds ratio of correlation, and 95%CI. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
An initial power calculation was carried out to compare non-nicotine consumers and nicotine consumers (including classic cigarettes, e-cigarettes and hookahs). Based on data from the German Robert Koch Institute and Federal Statistical Office of Germany (DSTATIS)81, it was assumed that approximately 50% of women of childbearing age regularly or occasionally consume nicotine products (including classic cigarettes, e-cigarettes and hookahs). With an equal distribution between both groups, a test power of 0.8, an alpha of 0.05 and a relative decrease in the pregnancy rate of 40% for nicotine consumers, the calculated sample size was n = 150 for each group. During sample collection it became clear that only about one third of our patients were regular/occasional nicotine consumers (including an unexpected high proportion of vaping patients and/or hookahs consumers). After statistical consultation, the sample size was increased to n = 320 and the study population was divided into three groups: Group 1 (non-smoking patients), Group 2 (smokers with or without additional e-cigarette and/or hookah consumption) and Group 3 (exclusive e-cigarette and/or hookah consumption). Thus, a post-hoc power analysis was done for the clinical pregnancy rate per oocyte pick-up for each group (dichotomous endpoint, alpha 0.05). The post-hoc power was 0.08 for Group 2 (smoker) and 0.03 for Group 3 (e-cigarettes and/or hookahs).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the University of Witten/Herdecke (#193/2017; Germany). Written informed consent sheets were given by all patients before MAR treatment.
Results
This study included a total of 320 women subjected to ICSI treatment due to male subfertility. According to the questionnaire, three patient groups were established: 217 were assigned to Group 1 (non-smoking patients), 61 to Group 2 (smokers with or without additional e-cigarette and/or hookah consumption), and 42 to Group 3 (exclusive e-cigarette and/or hookah consumption).
Regarding patient base characteristics and clinical history, which included average female and male ages, BMI, average serum oestradiol concentration before ovulation (in pg/ml), AMH prior to MAR treatment (in ng/ml), gonadotropin dosage for ovarian stimulation (in International Units), average number of previous OPU, day of embryo transfer, and number of transferred embryos, no significant differences were found between all groups (Table 1).
Basic characteristics of consumer behaviour according to the questionnaire for non-smokers (Group 1), smokers (Group 2), and vaping and/or hookah consuming patients (Group 3) are shown in Table 2. For Group 1 (non-smokers), 71 out of 217 (32.7%) patients quit smoking months/years before MAR treatment and 27 out of 217 (12.4%) were passive smokers with a regularly smoking partner. 119 patients never smoked or vaped regularly or occasionally (54.9%).
In Group 2 (smokers), 48 out of 61 patients consumed exclusively classic cigarettes (78.7%), ten out of 61 patients classic cigarettes and also hookahs (16.4%), and three out of 61 patients consumed classic cigarettes and are regularly vaping e-cigarettes (4.9%). For all smokers, the mean number of cigarettes consumed per day was 9.1 ± 5.5 (± SD) and the last cigarette was consumed on average 16.9 ± 34.2 h before oocyte pick-up. The patients included in Group 2 had smoked regularly for an average of 15.5 ± 4.7 years, whereby the longest period was 23 years and the shortest period 2 years. Patients vaping e-cigarettes in Group 3 consumed e-liquids with an average nicotine strength of 2.9 ± 4.1 mg/ml and the last e-cigarette was consumed on average 14.4 ± 14.8 h before oocyte pick-up.
Nicotine, cotinine, and benzo[a]pyrene content in the follicular fluid
GC–MS was used to analyse FF samples from all 320 patients. LOD were 0.33 ng/ml for nicotine, 0.27 ng/ml for cotinine, and 0.03 ng/ml for benzo[a]pyrene. LOQ were 1.28 ng/ml for nicotine (linearity: 5–800 ng/ml), 1.04 ng/ml for cotinine (linearity: 5–800 ng/ml), and 0.11 ng/ml for benzo[a]pyrene (linearity: 0.5–80 ng/ml). The analyte distribution for all samples is shown in Fig. 1.
In Group 1 (non-smokers), nicotine was detected in two (0.9%) and cotinine in nine (4.1%) out of 217 FF samples. The average value was 0.1 ± 1.6 ng/ml (± SD) (maximum: 22.8 ng/ml) for nicotine and 3.0 ± 17.6 ng/ml (maximum: 155 ng/ml) for cotinine (see Table 3). Two of the patients with nicotine or cotinine in their FF had quit smoking months previously and four were passive smokers. Three of the nine patients with nicotine or cotinine in their FF from Group 1 did not smoke, had never smoked, or were passive smokers according to the questionnaire.
In Group 2 (smokers), nicotine and cotinine were detected at a significantly higher proportion compared with non-smokers (p < 0.001). Nicotine was present in 18 (29.5%) and cotinine in 51 (83.6%) out of 61 FF samples. The average value was 3.6 ± 6.6 ng/ml (maximum: 26.3 ng/ml) for nicotine and 103.3 ± 100.7 ng/ml (maximum: 363 ng/ml) for cotinine. Both average values were significantly higher compared with those of non-smokers (p < 0.001) (see Table 3).
In patients who exclusively consumed e-cigarettes and/or hookahs (Group 3), nicotine was detected in two (4.8%) and cotinine in five (11.9%) out of 42 FF samples. The average value was 0.6 ± 2.9 ng/ml (maximum 17.5 ng/ml) for nicotine and 8.4 ± 33.4 ng/ml (maximum 200.0 ng/ml) for cotinine (Table 3). Thus, nicotine and cotinine were detected for the first time in the FF of patients who exclusively consumed e-cigarettes and/or hookahs. Although not significantly different, the nicotine/cotinine concentrations in the FF and mean values in this group were three to six-fold higher compared with those of non-smoking patients.
Nicotine (p < 0.01) and cotinine (p < 0.001) were detected at a significantly lower proportion in patients who exclusively consumed e-cigarettes and/or hookahs compared to smokers (Group 2). Additionally, mean values for nicotine (p < 0.01) and cotinine (p < 0.001) were significantly lower in Group 3 compared to Group 2.
In all groups, a robust correlation was observed between the detection of nicotine and cotinine in individual FF samples (Fig. 1; r = 0.76; p < 0.001). Unsurprisingly, cotinine levels were much higher due to nicotine’s shorter half-life (~ two hours) compared with that of cotinine (~ 16 h) (mean nicotine: 12.5 ± 6.6 ng/ml; mean cotinine 203.9 ± 83.6 ng/ml).
Finally, although a very sensitive LOD (0.03 ng substance/ml FF) was achieved, benzo[a]pyrene was not detected in any of the 320 FF samples.
Clinical parameters
No significant differences between groups were found regarding the average number of oocytes per OPU (Group 1: 8.9; 95%CI: 8.5–9.3; Group 2: 9.3; 95%CI: 8.6–9.9; Group 3: 9.5; 95%CI: 8.8–10.1) and number of mature MII per oocyte (Group 1: 6.5; MII Rate 73.0%; 95%CI: 67.9–79.6; Group 2: 6.8; MII Rate 73.1%; 95%CI: 61.9–84.2; Group 3: 6.8; MII Rate 71.6%; 95%CI: 57.9–85.2) (Table 4). The numbers of OPUs without oocytes or immature oocytes only, cycles without fertilisation, and cycles with irregular fertilisation were comparable and did not statistically differ between groups (see Table 4 for details). Fertilisation rates were 60.0% (95%CI: 53.8–66.8) in Group 1, 64.7% (95%CI: 52.7–76.7) in Group 2, and 60.3% (95%CI: 45.5–75.1) in Group 3. Rates of embryo transfers per OPU were not statistically different between non-smokers (91.7%; 95%CI: 88.1–95.3), smokers (90.2%; 95%CI: 82.8–97.7), and patients who exclusively consumed e-cigarettes and/or hookahs (85.7%; 95%CI: 75.1–96.3).
The number of previous cycles, gonadotropin dosages, average days of embryo transfer, and average number of transferred embryos were not statistically different between groups (Tables 1 and 4). Clinical pregnancy rates per OPU were 40.6% (95%CI: 34.0–47.1) in Group 1, 36.1% (95%CI: 24.1–48.1) in Group 2, and 40.5% (95%CI: 25.6–55.3) in Group 3. Overall, MAR outcomes in non-smoking patients, smoking patients, and patients who exclusively consumed e-cigarettes and/or hookahs were comparable for all parameters, with no significant differences.
Correlation analysis
Single and multiple linear and logistic correlation analyses were performed using data from all 320 samples analysed to assess the impact of nicotine and cotinine in the FF on MAR outcomes. No significant correlation was identified using single binary logistic regression analysis between cotinine concentrations in FF and clinical pregnancy (RN2 = 0.01; p = 0.43; odds ratio 1.001; 95%CI: 0.998–1.005) (Fig. 2a; left panel).
Similar results were obtained for nicotine (RN2 = 0.01; p = 0.22; odds ratio 1.039; 95%CI: 0.977–1.106) (Fig. 2b; right panel), as well as with multiple binary logistic regression analyses incorporating both nicotine and cotinine concentrations (RN2 = 0.01; p = 0.46; cotinine coefficient -0.001; odds ratio 0.999; 95%CI: 0.993–1.001 and nicotine coefficient 0.048; odds ratio 1.049; 95%CI: 0.951–1.158).
Using single linear regression models, no correlations were found for the number of oocytes per OPU, maturation and fertilisation rates, and cotinine or nicotine concentrations in FF. For cotinine, r values were 0.09 for the number of oocytes per OPU (p = 0.09), 0.04 for the maturation rate (p = 0.45), and 0.01 for the fertilisation rate (p = 0.83). Similar results were found for nicotine and the number of oocytes per OPU (r = 0.11; p = 0.08), the maturation rate (r = 0.06; p = 0.31), and the fertilisation rate (r = -0.02; p = 0.76).
Using multiple linear regression models with combined cotinine and nicotine concentrations in the FF, R2 values were 0.02 for the number of oocytes per OPU (p = 0.39), 0.01 for the maturation rate (p = 0.63), and 0.01 for the fertilisation rate (p = 0.88). Overall, no correlation was detected between the presence of nicotine and cotinine in the FF and MAR outcomes.
Additionally, patients’ questionnaires were evaluated to correlate consumption behaviour and the presence of nicotine and cotinine in the FF of smoking patients (n = 61; Group 2). There was a significant multiple variant correlation between the number of cigarettes consumed per day (X1), the time the last cigarette was consumed (X2), and cotinine concentrations in the FF (R2 = 0.07; p = 0.03). This correlation was only found between the number of cigarettes consumed per day and cotinine concentrations in the FF (r = 0.27; p = 0.03), while the time the last cigarette was consumed did not have a significant impact when considered separately (r = -0.21; p = 0.11).
No significant multiple or single correlations were found between nicotine concentrations and consumption behaviour. There was no significant correlation for the number of cigarettes consumed per day (r = 0.21; p = 0.11), the time the last cigarette was consumed (r = -0.08; p = 0.53), or for the multiple regression analysis taking both variables into account (R2 = 0.04; p = 0.39).
Discussion
In this study, the accumulation of nicotine, cotinine, and benzo[a]pyrene was analysed in the FF of 320 women subjected to ICSI treatment due to male subfertility. Via a questionnaire, patients’ consumption behaviour was assessed to identify i) non-smoking patients, ii) patients who consumed classic cigarettes (with or without additional consumption of e-cigarettes and/or hookahs), and iii) patients with exclusive consumption of e-cigarettes or hookahs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time nicotine, cotinine, and benzo[a]pyrene have been quantified in the FF of patients exclusively vaping e-cigarettes or smoking hookahs.
The accumulation of cotinine or nicotine in the FF or ovarian tissue in smoking patients undergoing MAR treatment has been reported8,25,38,39,40,41,42. In the present study, concentrations of nicotine and cotinine were comparable to previous studies. The accumulation of nicotine and cotinine in individual FF samples presented a strong correlation, as well as patient consumption behaviour and cotinine concentrations in the FF—which underlines the significance of the questionnaire.
In a Canadian study by Neal et al.43, benzo[a]pyrene levels of 1.32 ± 0.68 ng/ml were detected in the FF of 19 smokers using GC–MS analysis. In another Canadian study by Zenzes and colleagues25, benzo[a]pyrene-DNA adducts were quantified via immunostaining granulosa cells of patients undergoing MAR treatment.
In this study, we did not detect benzo[a]pyrene in any of the 320 samples analysed, even though a very sensitive LOD of 0.03 ng benzo[a]pyrene/ml FF was applied. However, benzo[a]pyrene concentrations per cigarette vary between tobacco brands and also within one brand and different consumer regions/countries. Additionally, the cigarette production process and cigarette smoke composition have gradually changed during the last decades44,45,46. For example, Yershova et al.44 analysed benzo[a]pyrene in 43 different tobacco brands, reporting levels varying between 4 and 44 ng/cigarette. Hence, different cigarette compositions and consumer regions might explain the lack of benzo[a]pyrene detection in the FF of the German women in this study.
For the first time, nicotine and cotinine were detected in the FF of patients exclusively vaping e-cigarettes or smoking hookahs. The frequency and concentrations of nicotine and cotinine were significantly lower compared with smoking patients. However, it should be noted that the average nicotine strength of the consumed e-liquids according to the questionnaire can be considered as low (2.9 ± 4.1 mg nicotine per ml), no data about the daily consume of e-cigarettes were available and Group 3 was heterogeneous (regular/occasional hookah consumers with or without regular/occasional vaping). Taken together, this could explain the lower values of nicotine and cotinine in the FF of patients exclusively vaping e-cigarettes or smoking hookahs compared to smokers. Nevertheless, nicotine and cotinine were found more frequently in the FF and mean values were increased in Group 3 compared with non-smoking patients. Vaping liquids, even those that are nicotine-free, and hookah tobaccos contain or produce several potentially harmful substances. These include propylene glycol, glycerine, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, methylglyoxal, benzaldehyde, and endocrine-disrupting chemicals28,29,30. The cytotoxicity and, in particular, ovarian toxicity of e-cigarette liquids were demonstrated in animal models, in vitro and in vivo. Investigations in humans are rare and overall knowledge regarding the impact of vaping on human fertility is limited47. Nevertheless, in vitro exposure of ovaries to propylene glycol and glycerine leads to ovarian dysfunctionality, which includes morphological damage, oxidative balance disruption, and an increased apoptosis rate in rats48. In vitro exposure of ovaries to e-cigarette liquids in rodents impairs folliculogenesis and oestrogen secretion49; additionally, it affects mitochondrial function and the proteome in Chinese hamster V79 lung fibroblast cell lines by depletion of numerous proteins—especially related to mitochondrial functionality50. In vivo exposure to vaping substances also hampers metabolic functionality and gene expression in mice51,52. The potential adverse effects of heating liquids or smoking hookahs need to be examined in future studies with larger sample sizes—particularly in humans.
Smoking affects general health and is associated with several severe diseases. There is an ongoing debate about whether, and to what degree, smoking limits MAR outcomes. While some studies reported adverse effects with reduced clinical pregnancy rates33,34, increased abortion rates33,53, fewer oocytes per OPU42,54,55,56, lower fertilisation rates54,57, reduced endometrial thickness37, higher gonadotropin dosages for ovarian stimulation58, and increased cytoplasmic and meiotic anomalies55,59, others did not confirm these findings. In several studies, clinical pregnancy rates37,38,53,54,57, numbers of oocytes37,59,60, maturation rates37,60, fertilisation rates38,60, embryonic morphology and development38,57, implantation rates57, and miscarriage rates37 were similar between smoking and non-smoking patients undergoing MAR treatment.
In a systematic review including 21 studies35, patients who smoked had a significantly lower clinical pregnancy rate per cycle (OR 0.56, 95%CI: 0.43–0.73) and a significantly higher spontaneous miscarriage rate (OR 2.65, 95%CI: 1.33–5.30). However, the sample sizes of the studies included were low and varied between 41 and 834 cycles for clinical pregnancy rates (overall n = 5243) and between 23 and 1196 for miscarriage rates (n = 1,899). In contrast, in a recent retrospective cohort study on assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles from the United States, nearly 750,000 ART cycles between 2009 and 2013 were analysed for MAR outcomes in smoking and non-smoking subjects36. The number of cycle cancellations (cycles halted before egg retrieval or embryo transfer) was increased in smoking patients; however, the clinical pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates were comparable between non-smokers and smokers36.
It was hypothesised that smoking is particularly harmful for older patients60. In our study, no correlation between smoking, age, and MAR outcomes was found, nevertheless, it should be noted that our patient cohort was relatively young (mean 33.0 ± 3.6 years); only 22 patients were ≥ 39 years old. Smoking reactants and products can interfere with hormonal and metabolic homeostasis, cellular growth, and genetic constitution during folliculogenesis and oogenesis, as shown in several studies in vitro and in vivo24,58,60,61,62,63,64. Negative selection might eliminate impaired germ cells during hormonal stimulation so that only capable oocytes develop. Consequently, these oocytes possess a normal capacity for maturation, fertilisation, and embryonic development. In patients of advanced age, the oocyte pool might already be compromised and, likewise, the possibility of obtaining healthy oocytes with regular potential for maturation, fertilisation, and embryonic development. Thus, negative effects due to smoking do not necessarily affect MAR outcomes in patients undergoing ICSI treatment – especially younger patients.
In this study, the outcome of the MAR treatment was not negatively correlated with smoking. It should be noted that smoking not only impairs female gametogenesis and natural conception, but also has adverse effects on male spermatogenesis. The influence of smoking on sperm quality and quantity, as well as epigenetic alterations, has been described in several studies74,75,76,77,78. Accordingly, smoking itself could be a decisive factor for the origin of male infertility and thus one reason for MAR treatment. As shown in this study, MAR Treatment may overcome natural limitation associated with smoking. However, transgenerational and thus long-lasting effects of smoking to the offspring—especially with regards to epigenetic factors—cannot be excluded after ICSI treatment to overcome these limitations79,80. Without doubt, further studies are necessary to assess the risks of smoking and vaping on potential transgenerational effects after MAR treatment.
Furthermore, the quantity of smoking is a relevant factor. Many studies do not discriminate between regular smokers and those with the occasional consumption of tobacco products. In the present study, consumption behaviour was assessed and the correlation between consumption behaviour, individual FF levels of smoking toxins, and MAR outcomes was analysed. No negative effect was observed between cotinine and nicotine levels in the FF and number of oocytes, maturation rates, fertilisation, or clinical pregnancy rates. However, although this study includes one of the largest prospective datasets with at least 320 patients undergoing MAR treatment, smoking products were detected in only one-third of the samples analysed. Further studies with larger sample sizes—especially for vaping or hookah-smoking patients—are necessary to assess the impact of smoking/vaping on MAR treatment outcomes.
Conclusion
In the present study, we demonstrated that nicotine and cotinine can be quantified in the human FF of patients undergoing MAR treatment, while benzo[a]pyrene was not detectable in the 320 samples analysed. Smoking status and individual accumulation of smoking toxins in the FF had no statistically significant impact on MAR treatment outcomes. Clinical pregnancy, maturation, and fertilization rates and the numbers of retrieved oocytes were not statistically significantly different. Patient consumption behaviour was evaluated via a questionnaire and, for the first time, nicotine and cotinine were quantified in the FF of patients exclusively vaping e-cigarettes or smoking hookahs. Regarding MAR outcomes, no statistically significant adverse effects were found in patients who vaped or smoked hookahs. The potential adverse effects of vaping liquids or smoking hookahs need to be examined in further studies with larger sample sizes.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed in this study are included in this published article. The questionnaire used during this study is available from the corresponding author upon request.
Abbreviations
- MAR:
-
Medically assisted reproduction
- ICSI:
-
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection
- e-cigarette:
-
Electronic cigarette
- FF:
-
Follicular fluid
- GC–MS:
-
Gas chromatography–Mass spectrometry
- E2:
-
Serum oestradiol
- AMH:
-
Anti-Müllerian hormone
- IU:
-
International unit
- MII:
-
Metaphase II oocyte
- 0PN:
-
Oocyte without pronuclei
- 1PN:
-
One pronucleus oocyte
- 2PN:
-
Two pronuclei oocyte
- 3PN:
-
Three or more pronuclei oocyte
- BMI:
-
Body mass index
- OPU:
-
Oocyte pick-up
- LOD:
-
Limits of detection
- LOQ:
-
Limits of quantification
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
- 95%CI:
-
95% Confidence interval
References
Sherman, C. B. Health effects of cigarette smoking. Clin. Chest Med. 12(4), 643–658 (1991).
Tsiara, S., Elisaf, M. & Mikhailidis, D. P. Influence of smoking on predictors of vascular disease. Angiology 54(5), 507–530 (2003).
Das, S. K. Harmful health effects of cigarette smoking. Mol. Cell Biochem. 253(1–2), 159–165 (2003).
Augood, C., Duckitt, K. & Templeton, A. A. Smoking and female infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. 13(6), 1532–1539 (1998).
Hull, M. G., North, K., Taylor, H., Farrow, A. & Ford, W. C. Delayed conception and active and passive smoking. The Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood Study Team. Fertil. Steril. 74(4), 725–733 (2000).
Lintsen, A. M. E. et al. Effects of subfertility cause, smoking and body weight on the success rate of IVF. Hum. Reprod. 20(7), 1867–1875 (2005).
Firns, S. et al. The effect of cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption and fruit and vegetable consumption on IVF outcomes: A review and presentation of original data. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 13, 134 (2015).
Benedict, M. D., Missmer, S. A., Vitonis, A. F., Cramer, D. W. & Meeker, J. D. Cotinine concentrations in follicular fluid as a measure of secondhand tobacco smoke exposure in women undergoing in vitro fertilization: Inter-matrix comparisons with urine and temporal variability. Chemosphere 84(1), 110–116 (2011).
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Smoking and infertility: A committee opinion. Fertil. Steril. 98(6), 1400–1406 (2012).
Radin, R. G. et al. Active and passive smoking and fecundability in Danish pregnancy planners. Fertil. Steril. 102(1), 183-191.e2 (2014).
Stedman, R. L. Chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke. Chem. Rev. 68(2), 153–207 (1968).
Burns, D. M. Cigarettes and cigarette smoking. Clin. Chest Med. 12(4), 631–642 (1991).
Hecht, S. S. Cigarette smoking: Cancer risks, carcinogens, and mechanisms. Langenbeck’s Arch. Surg. 391(6), 603–613 (2006).
Benowitz, N. L., Kuyt, F., Jacob, P. 3rd., Jones, R. T. & Osman, A. L. Cotinine disposition and effects. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 34(5), 604–611 (1983).
Wall, M. A., Johnson, J., Jacob, P. & Benowitz, N. L. Cotinine in the serum, saliva, and urine of nonsmokers, passive smokers, and active smokers. Am. J. Public Health. 78(6), 699–701 (1988).
Zevin, S., Gourlay, S. G. & Benowitz, N. L. Clinical pharmacology of nicotine. Clin. Dermatol. 16(5), 557–564 (1998).
Zevin, S., Jacob, P., Geppetti, P. & Benowitz, N. L. Clinical pharmacology of oral cotinine. Drug Alcohol Depend. 60(1), 13–18 (2000).
Hukkanen, J. & Benowitz, N. L. Metabolism and disposition kinetics of nicotine. Pharmacol. Rev. 57(1), 79–115 (2005).
Kaiserman, M. J. & Rickert, W. S. Carcinogens in tobacco smoke: Benzo[a]pyrene from Canadian cigarettes and cigarette tobacco. Am. J. Public Health. 82(7), 1023–1026 (1992).
Baker, R. R. Smoke generation inside a burning cigarette: Modifying combustion to develop cigarettes that may be less hazardous to health. Prog. Energy Combust Sci. 32(4), 373–385 (2006).
Gocze, P. M., Szabo, I. & Freeman, D. A. Influence of nicotine, cotinine, anabasine and cigarette smoke extract on human granulosa cell progesterone and estradiol synthesis. Gynecol. Endocrinol. Off. J. Int. Soc. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 13(4), 266–272 (1999).
Shiverick, K. T. & Salafia, C. Cigarette smoking and pregnancy I: Ovarian, uterine and placental effects. Placenta 20(4), 265–272 (1999).
Barbieri, R. L., McShane, P. M. & Ryan, K. J. Constituents of cigarette smoke inhibit human granulosa cell aromatase. Fertil. Steril. 46(2), 232–236 (1986).
Neal, M. S., Zhu, J., Holloway, A. C. & Foster, W. G. Follicle growth is inhibited by benzo-[a]-pyrene, at concentrations representative of human exposure, in an isolated rat follicle culture assay. Hum. Reprod. 22(4), 961–967 (2007).
Zenzes, M. T., Puy, L. A. & Bielecki, R. Immunodetection of benzo[a]pyrene adducts in ovarian cells of women exposed to cigarette smoke. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 4(2), 159–165 (1998).
Jerzyński, T. & Stimson, G. Estimation of the global number of vapers: 82 million worldwide in 2021. Drugs Habits Soc. Policy 2023, 24 (2023).
Jerzyński, T., Stimson, G. V., Shapiro, H. & Król, G. Estimation of the global number of e-cigarette users in 2020. Harm. Reduct. J. 18(1), 109 (2021).
Qasim, H. et al. The effects of hookah/waterpipe smoking on general health and the cardiovascular system. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 24(1), 58 (2019).
Szumilas, K., Szumilas, P., Grzywacz, A. & Wilk, A. The effects of E-cigarette vapor components on the morphology and function of the male and female reproductive systems: A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 17 (2020).
Marques, P., Piqueras, L. & Sanz, M.-J. An updated overview of e-cigarette impact on human health. Respir. Res. 22(1), 151 (2021).
Cheng, W.-H., Chang, C.-Y., Chen, Y.-Y. & Su, H.-W. Chemical composition of aerosols of an electronic cigarette. Aerosol. Air Qual. Res. 21(7), 200672 (2021).
Wei, B., O’Connor, R. J., Goniewicz, M. L. & Hyland, A. Emerging chemicals of health concern in electronic nicotine delivery systems. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 33(10), 2637–2646 (2020).
Soares, S. R., Simon, C., Remohí, J. & Pellicer, A. Cigarette smoking affects uterine receptiveness. Hum. Reprod. 22(2), 543–547 (2007).
Crha, I. et al. The outcome of infertility treatment by in-vitro fertilisation in smoking and non-smoking women. Cent. Eur. J. Public Health 9(2), 64–68 (2001).
Waylen, A. L., Metwally, M., Jones, G. L., Wilkinson, A. J. & Ledger, W. L. Effects of cigarette smoking upon clinical outcomes of assisted reproduction: A meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 15(1), 31–44 (2009).
Rockhill, K. et al. Smoking and clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies. J. Womens Health (Larchmt) 28(3), 314–322 (2019).
Heger, A., Sator, M., Walch, K. & Pietrowski, D. Smoking decreases endometrial thickness in IVF/ICSI patients. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 78(1), 78–82 (2018).
Cinar, O. et al. Does cigarette smoking really have detrimental effects on outcomes of IVF?. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 174, 106–113 (2014).
Weiss, T. & Eckert, A. Cotinine levels in follicular fluid and serum of IVF patients: Effect on granulosa-luteal cell function in vitro. Hum. Reprod. 4(5), 482–485 (1989).
Younglai, E. V., Foster, W. G., Hughes, E. G., Trim, K. & Jarrell, J. F. Levels of environmental contaminants in human follicular fluid, serum, and seminal plasma of couples undergoing in vitro fertilization. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 43(1), 121–126 (2002).
Peterson, C. M. et al. Serum and follicular fluid nicotine concentrations in women undergoing IVF. Hum. Reprod. 12(2), 6–7 (1997).
Fuentes, A. et al. Recent cigarette smoking and assisted reproductive technologies outcome. Fertil. Steril. 93(1), 89–95 (2010).
Neal, M. S., Zhu, J. & Foster, W. G. Quantification of benzo[a]pyrene and other PAHs in the serum and follicular fluid of smokers versus non-smokers. Reprod. Toxicol. 25(1), 100–106 (2008).
Yershova, K. et al. Tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarettes smoked by the participants of the Shanghai Cohort Study. Int. J. Cancer 139(6), 1261–1269 (2016).
Ding, Y. S. et al. Determination of 14 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in mainstream smoke from US Brand and Non-US Brand Cigarettes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40(4), 1133–1138 (2006).
Hoffmann, D. & Hoffmann, I. The changing cigarette, 1950–1995. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 50(4), 307–364 (1997).
Montjean, D., Godin-Pagé, M.-H., Bélanger, M.-C., Benkhalifa, M. & Miron, P. An overview of E-cigarette impact on reproductive health. Life (Basel, Switzerl.) 13, 3 (2023).
Chen, T. et al. Ovarian toxicity of e-cigarette liquids: Effects of components and high and low nicotine concentration e-cigarette liquid in vitro. Tob. Induct. Dis. 21, 1–8 (2023).
Chen, T. et al. Effect of e-cigarette refill liquid on follicular development and estrogen secretion in rats. Tob. Induct. Dis. 20, 1–8 (2022).
Trifunovic, S. et al. Electronic cigarette liquids impair metabolic cooperation and alter proteomic profiles in V79 cells. Respir. Res. 23(1), 191 (2022).
Lechasseur, A. et al. Glycerol contained in vaping liquids affects the liver and aspects of energy homeostasis in a sex-dependent manner. Physiol. Rep. 10(2), e15146 (2022).
Wetendorf, M. et al. E-cigarette exposure delays implantation and causes reduced weight gain in female offspring exposed in utero. J. Endocr. Soc. 3(10), 1907–1916 (2019).
Maximovich, A. & Beyler, S. A. Cigarette smoking at time of in vitro fertilization cycle initiation has negative effect on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer success rate. J. Assist Reprod. Genet. 12(2), 75–77 (1995).
El-Nemr, A. et al. Effect of smoking on ovarian reserve and ovarian stimulation in in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod. 13(8), 2192–2198 (1998).
Zenzes, M. T., Wang, P. & Casper, R. F. Cigarette smoking may affect meiotic maturation of human oocytes. Hum. Reprod. 10(12), 3213–3217 (1995).
Zenzes, M. T. Smoking and reproduction: Gene damage to human gametes and embryos. Hum. Reprod. Update 6(2), 122–131 (2000).
Gruber, I., Just, A., Birner, M. & Lösch, A. Effect of a woman’s smoking status on oocyte, zygote, and day 3 pre-embryo quality in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. Fertil. Steril. 90(4), 1249–1252 (2008).
Paszkowski, T., Clarke, R. N. & Hornstein, M. D. Smoking induces oxidative stress inside the Graafian follicle. Hum. Reprod. 17(4), 921–925 (2002).
Ozbakir, B. & Tulay, P. Does cigarette smoking really have a clinical effect on folliculogenesis and oocyte maturation?. Zygote 28(4), 318–321 (2020).
Zenzes, M. T., Reed, T. E. & Casper, R. F. Effects of cigarette smoking and age on the maturation of human oocytes. Hum. Reprod. 12(8), 1736–1741 (1997).
Cheng, S.-F. et al. Nicotine exposure impairs germ cell development in human fetal ovaries cultured in vitro. Aging (Albany N. Y.) 10(7), 1556–1574 (2018).
Miceli, F. et al. Effects of nicotine on human luteal cells in vitro: A possible role on reproductive outcome for smoking women. Biol. Reprod. 72(3), 628–632 (2005).
Paixão, L. L. O. et al. Cigarette smoke impairs granulosa cell proliferation and oocyte growth after exposure cessation in young Swiss mice: An experimental study. J. Ovarian Res. 5(1), 25 (2012).
Baird, W. M., Hooven, L. A. & Mahadevan, B. Carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts and mechanism of action. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 45(2–3), 106–114 (2005).
ECHA—Proposal for Harmonised Classification and Labelling. EC Number: 200-193-3 (2023). www.echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/3d204f3cde50-65b4-5fd8-1f0ddd7638b9
Benowitz, N. L., Hukkanen, J. & Jacob, P. 3rd. Nicotine chemistry, metabolism, kinetics and biomarkers. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 192, 29–60 (2009).
Neri, A. & Marcus, S. L. Effect of nicotine on the motility of the oviducts in the rhesus monkey. Reproduction 31(1), 91–97 (1972).
Adeyemi, D. H., Oyeyipo, I. P., Akanbi, K. A. & Oluwole, T. Nicotine alters progesterone and estradiol levels during the first trimester of pregnancy in Wistar rats. JBRA Assist. Reprod. 22(2), 78–81 (2018).
Gocze, P. M. & Freeman, D. A. Cytotoxic effects of cigarette smoke alkaloids inhibit the progesterone production and cell growth of cultured MA-10 Leydig tumor cells. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 93(1), 77–83 (2000).
Chung, S.-S., Zheng, J.-S., Kwong, A. C. S. & Lai, V. W. Y. Harmful flame retardant found in electronic cigarette aerosol. J. Clean Prod. 171, 10–16 (2018).
WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. World Health Organization (2010).
D’Angelo, A. et al. Recommendations for good practice in ultrasound: Oocyte pick up. Hum. Reprod. Open 2019(4), hoz025 (2019).
O’Neill, C. L., Chow, S., Rosenwaks, Z. & Palermo, G. D. Development of ICSI. Reproduction 156(1), F51–F58 (2018).
Bundhun, P. K. et al. Tobacco smoking and semen quality in infertile males: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 19(1), 36 (2019).
Jenkins, T. G. et al. Cigarette smoking significantly alters sperm DNA methylation patterns. Andrology 5(6), 1089–1099 (2017).
Asare-Anane, H. et al. Tobacco smoking is associated with decreased semen quality. Reprod. Health 13(1), 90 (2016).
Kovac, J. R., Khanna, A. & Lipshultz, L. I. The effects of cigarette smoking on male fertility. Postgrad. Med. 127(3), 338–341 (2015).
Laqqan, M. et al. Aberrant DNA methylation patterns of human spermatozoa in current smoker males. Reprod. Toxicol. 71, 126–133 (2017).
Kitaba, N. T. et al. Fathers’ preconception smoking and offspring DNA methylation. Clin. Epigenet. 15(1), 131 (2023).
Mørkve-Knudsen, G. T. et al. Epigenome-wide association of father’s smoking with offspring DNA methylation: A hypothesis-generating study. Environ. Epigenet. 5(4), dvz023 (2019).
Robert Koch Institute. Smoking—current developments among adults. www.rki.de/DE/Content/Gesundheitsmonitoring/Gesundheitsberichterstattung/GBEDownloadsK/2011_4_Rauchen.html (2011).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Johannes Traut, Isabell Keimer, and Sarah Schuhmann for coordination during the sample collection and Falko Wuensche and Stephanie Hammer for their incredible technical assistance and commitment to sample preparation and measurements. Editorial assistance, in the form of language editing and correction, was provided by XpertScientific Editing and Consulting Services.
Funding
The study was supported by Ferring Pharmaceuticals. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SD supervised the study and was involved in conceptualisation and funding acquisition. TT and SD contributed to data analysis, critical intellectual input, data interpretation, and manuscript drafting. SK and CO were involved in data analysis and sample collection. All authors were involved in drafting and/or revising the manuscript and approved the final manuscript. All authors provided consent for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Trapphoff, T., Ontrup, C., Krug, S. et al. Consumption of hookahs, e-cigarettes, and classic cigarettes and the impact on medically assisted reproduction treatment. Sci Rep 14, 9597 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60251-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60251-y
- Springer Nature Limited