Abstract
The black shinner Pseudopungtungia nigra Mori, 1935 is an endangered fish endemic to Korea. It lives in the narrow basin of the Geumgang River, Mangyeonggang River, and Ungcheoncheon Stream, which flow into the West Sea of Korea. One population of P. nigra in Ungcheoncheon Stream has been locally exterminated once; it is now inhabiting the upper reaches of the dam through a restoration program. Efforts to identify and understand the genetic structure of these populations are important for conservation planning. Here, we analyzed genetic diversity using 21 microsatellite markers for 9 populations. The mean number of alleles ranged from 4.4 to 8.1, mean allelic richness ranged from 4.6 to 7.8, mean observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.519 to 0.702, and mean expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.540 to 0.763. All groups had recent and historical bottlenecks (P < 0.05, M-ratio < 0.68). Three groups [YD (2019), OC and UC] had significant inbreeding index values, suggesting that they were engaged in inbreeding. We observed a moderate level of genetic differentiation between MG and the rest of the population (FST = 0.135 to 0.168, P < 0.05). The genetic structure exhibited a fitting constant K = 2, along with separation between MG and the remaining populations. With respect to genetic flow, YD (2019), OC, CG, and ND shifted to the UC population (0.263 to 0.278). The genetic flow of each population was transferred only within the population; there was no gene flow among populations, except for the Ungcheoncheon Stream population. This study shows that the Ungcheoncheon Stream population needs conservation efforts to increase its genetic diversity, and the Geumgang River populations needs a conservation plan that considers the possibility of conservation and evolution through gene exchange among the populations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Biodiversity has exhibited greater decline in freshwater ecosystems than in terrestrial and marine ecosystems1,2,3. Because of human activities and the expansion of living areas toward rivers, numerous freshwater fish have become endangered via habitat fragmentation (e.g. by dams and weirs), pollution, and overfishing4,5,6. In particular, fish living in rivers are sensitive to the effects of physical, chemical, and biological factors on aquatic environments,rapid changes to environmental conditions increase the possibility of species extinction7,8,9. Therefore, restoration plans have been established to prevent the extinction of endangered species10,11,12,13.
In the past, genetic management was not considered when designing restoration plans12. However, the need for genetic management has been continuously advocated for the efficient restoration of endangered species14,15. Accordingly, genetic technologies have been used and improved in conservation planning in recent decades, but the application of genetic management remains insufficient because of awareness and cost issues13,16,17.
Microsatellites have specific sequence repeats, are widely distributed throughout the genome, and have high polymorphism; thus, they are widely used in conservation studies of endangered species to investigate genetic diversity, genetic structure, bottlenecks, and genetic flow among populations18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26.
The black shinner Pseudopungtungia nigra Mori, 1935 is an endangered species endemic to Korea, which belongs to the Cypriniformes order, Cyprinidae family, and Gobioninae subfamily. It is found only on the Korean Peninsula and is narrowly distributed in the water systems of the Geumgang River, Ungcheoncheon Stream, and Mangyeonggang River27,28. The black shinner is highly regarded as an ornamental fish because of its streamlined body and black spot pattern on the tail, it is at risk of overfishing because of human activities. Considering its narrow distribution and risk of overfishing, the black shinner has been designated as first-class endangered wildlife in Korea29. The fish mainly lives in rocky or stony places with good water quality,it breeds by brood parasitism in the spawning grounds of Coreoperca herzi and is thus found together with C. herzi27.
In the Ungcheoncheon Stream water system, a P. nigra habitat was identified prior to the construction of the Boryeong dam (1992), but it was not found anywhere upstream or downstream after the construction of the dam; thus, it is considered extinct in this region (Ministry of Environment30). In contrast, the construction of the Daecheong and Yongdam dams in the Geumgang River water system, where P. nigra is widely distributed, has led to habitat fragmentation; the construction of continuous weirs continues to cause increasing fragmentation. Accordingly, a release project for restoration was conducted to prevent the extinction of fish in the upper stream of Gapcheon, a tributary of the Geumgang River water system, and in the Ungcheoncheon Stream downstream of the Boryeong dam (Ministry of Environment30). However, the population was not restored because of failed habitat adaptation, except in a narrow portion of the Ungcheoncheon Stream in the upper reaches of the Boryeong dam. The Ungcheoncheon Stream population is presumed to have used the Geumgang River water system population for restoration, but this speculation cannot be confirmed because there is no official record. Reintroductions are important tools for the recovery of endangered species31. Effective reintroduction programs in endangered fish populations require extensive knowledge of their genetic structure32. Genetic diversity and bottlenecks in reintroduced populations must be carefully considered for species restoration14,33,34. Although restoration was successful, factors such as genetic diversity were not considered in the restoration program at the time. Generally, conservation programs for endangered species have many issues to consider related to genetic factors, such as inbreeding in declining populations35,36. In the absence of prior knowledge regarding genetic background, perturbations of the genetic structure of the restoration population may have adverse effects37,38. The identification of genetic diversity and genetic structure in the Ungcheoncheon Stream population restored by reintroduction can provide important insights for conservation planning. Thus, there is a need to clarify the origin during efforts to conserve the genetic diversity of the Ungcheoncheon Stream population.
Genetic diversity is the driving force that allows species to adapt to their environment and maintain their evolutionary potential14,39,40. Habitat fragmentation limits gene flow, thereby increasing genetic inbreeding14,41. Increased inbreeding causes inbreeding depression, and positive feedback from inbreeding depression increasingly accelerates population extinction42,43,44. Currently, the population of P. nigra is in a state of habitat fragmentation related to the construction of dams and weirs; it has already been exterminated once in the Ungcheoncheon Stream water system. Because the restored Ungcheoncheon population is isolated, it is likely to experience inbreeding depression in the absence of outside intervention. Genetic studies of some populations in the Geumgang and Mangyeonggang Rivers were conducted using amplified fragment length polymorphism markers to establish a restoration plan45. However, there is a lack of information regarding genetic diversity and structure of the overall population of P. nigra; such information is necessary for comprehensive conservation management plans. Moreover, efficient conservation planning requires genetic studies of restoration and isolated populations.
In the present study, genetic diversity was analyzed for the Geumgang River water system population, Ungcheoncheon Stream population (restored population), and Mangyeonggang River population; the Yudeungcheon Stream (2012) and Mangyeonggang River (2008) populations were also subjected to genetic monitoring analyses. Additionally, the genetic structure was evaluated to determine the distributions of genetic differentiation and variation at the species and population levels; the genetic flow was analyzed to provide information regarding the origin of the restored Ungcheoncheon population (UC). Overall genetic information regarding this species will provide the basis for conservation and management plans for endangered P. nigra.
Materials and methods
Sampling and DNA extraction
P. nigra Mori, 1935 is an endangered species in Korea and was collected with permission from the Geum River Basin Environmental Office (permit nos.: 2018-35, 2019-26) and Jeonbuk Regional Environmental Office of the Ministry of Environment (permit nos.: 2018-16, 2019-15). The sampled areas were collected as shown in Fig. 1 between March and November 2019 (Geumgang River, Ungcheoncheon Stream, and Mangyeonggang River water systems). For the P. nigra samples, we used pectoral fin tissue to obtain at least 30 DNA samples (Supplementary Table S1). DNA samples previously collected from the Yudengcheon (2012) and Mankyunggang (2008) populations were included in the genetic diversity analysis because they are isolated populations that require genetic monitoring. The remaining populations were excluded from genetic monitoring analysis because they did not have DNA samples available. Genomic DNA was extracted using the Genomic DNA Prep Kit (BioFact, Seoul, South Korea), in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. Tissue samples were stored in 99% ethanol until DNA extraction. DNA samples were diluted to 50 ng/µL with deionized water and stored at − 80 °C.
Multiplex PCR and genotyping
The microsatellite markers developed in a previous study46 constituted four multiplex PCR sets for efficient genotyping and reduced analysis costs (Supplementary Table S2). Multiplex PCR reactions were performed in sets of four; forward primers were labeled with 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM), hexachlorofluorescein (HEX), and tetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA). The PCR reaction comprised a total volume of 20 µL, including 50 ng of genomic DNA and forward and reverse primers at concentrations of 0.1 µM, along with the Multiplex PCR Premix (Bioneer Inc., Daejeon, South Korea). The following thermocycler conditions were used: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; 34 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 57.5 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s; and final elongation at 72 °C for 7 min. Amplified products were identified by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel. For genotyping, 1 µL of tenfold diluted PCR product was mixed with Hi-Di formamide (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 500 LIZ size standard (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA), denatured at 95 °C for 5 min, then analyzed on an ABI 3730xl Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The size of the allele was determined by scoring for each marker using Peak Scanner software (Ver. 1.0; Applied Biosystems); MICRO-CHECKER software (Ver. 2.2.3)47 was used to evaluate the presence or absence of scoring errors in markers.
Genetic diversity and bottleneck analyses
Genetic diversity was measured by number of alleles (NA), expected heterozygosity (HE), and observed heterozygosity (HO) using CERVUS software (Ver. 3.0)48. Allelic richness (AR was analyzed using FSTAT software (Ver. 2.9.3)49 to correct for population-level differences. Analyses of population inbreeding coefficient (FIS and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE deviations were performed using GENEPOP software (Ver. 4.2)50 and ARLEQUIN software (Ver. 3.5)51.
Two methods were used to estimate bottlenecks. The first method used BOTTLENECK software (Ver. 1.2.02)52, a program for estimating bottlenecks via heterozygous excess testing using the infinite allele model53, two-phase model, and stepwise mutation model54. Each model was run for 10,000 iterations, and significance was determined using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test55. The second method used the M-ratio56, which estimates bottlenecks by using the mean ratio of the range of allele numbers and allele sizes,this analysis was performed using ARLEQUIN (Ver. 3.5)51. To determine the size of the effective population, LDNE software57 was used for linkage disequilibrium estimation.
Population genetic structure and gene flow analysis
Genetic distance was analyzed using Nei’s minimum distance method58 in the Genclass 2 software (Ver. 2.0)59. Genetic differentiation (FST analysis and analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA were conducted using ARLEQUIN (Ver. 3.5)51. For cluster analysis, principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on genetic distance was performed using GenAlEx software (Ver. 6.50)60.
Genetic structure analysis was performed with STRUCTURE software (Ver. 2.3)61 using a Bayesian method of model-based clustering. The assignment test was performed via clustering between individuals, the no-admixture method, an appropriate model, was applied to unmixed water systems. To determine the most appropriate population, the population constant (K) was determined in the range of 1–10. Clustering was performed repeatedly with a burn-in length of 50,000; Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis was repeated with 100,000 iterations. To estimate the population constant (K), cluster results corresponding to the appropriate K values were analyzed with STRUCTURE HARVESTER62. Discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) was conducted to analyze gene clusters using the Adegenet package in R (Ver. 2.1.3)63, on a non-model basis without prior information about populations.
Migration rates among populations were measured using BayesAss software (Ver. 3.0.4)64. The Markov chain Monte Carlo method was used for 10,000,000 iterations, with a burn-in length of 1,000,000.
The model that best explains the statistical origin of the present reintroduced population was identified using DIYABC software (Ver. 2.1.0)65. An approximate Bayesian computational approach (ABC) was used to evaluate the posterior probabilities of past scenarios. Five populations from the Geumgang River water system were combined and divided into three groups, the Mangyeonggang River population and the UC population, to evaluate origin scenarios for reintroduction (UC) history (Fig. 1).
Ethical approval
All experimental protocols were approved by the designated Soonchunhyang University and the permission committee of the Ministry of Environment, Korea (permit nos.: 2018-35, 2019-26, 2018-16, 2019-15). We declare that all methods were performed in accordance with Soonchunhyang University and the Ministry of Environment guidelines and regulations. In addition, all experiments were performed in accordance with ARRIVE related guidelines and Soonchunhyang University regulations. Samples by population were collected according to the guidelines of Soonchunhyang University and the Ministry of Environment, Korea.
Results
Genetic diversity and bottlenecks
Among the developed microsatellite markers46,66, 25 microsatellite loci were successfully amplified and used to establish at least four markers per multiplex PCR set. The multiplex PCR assays consisted of seven-loci (Set1) and six-loci (Set2, Set3, and Set4) reaction systems. Information and product sizes for the four multiplex PCR sets are presented in Supplementary Table S1. Of the 25 microsatellites, 21 were included in the population analysis, and four with PIC < 0.3 were excluded.
Genetic diversity information for nine populations of P. nigra is shown in Table 1. With respect to the 21 microsatellite markers used for genetic diversity, no evidence of linkage disequilibrium was present after Bonferroni correction. The number of mean alleles per locus for the entire population ranged from 4.4 to 8.1 (Table 1). The mean allelic richness (AR) ranged from 4.6 to 7.8, mean observed heterozygosity (HO) ranged from 0.519 to 0.702, and mean expected heterozygosity (HE) ranged from 0.540 to 0.763; these results indicated moderate genetic diversity. Among the nine populations, the CG, OC, and ND populations had high genetic diversity compared with the other populations, whereas the MG (2019 and 2008) populations had low genetic diversity. The YD (2019) population had increased genetic diversity compared with the previously sampled YD (2012) population (HO = 0.661 and 0.653, respectively); the MG (2019) population also had higher genetic diversity than the previously sampled MG (2008) population (HO = 0.551 and 0.519, respectively). Notably, the UC population, a population restored after extinction in the Ungcheoncheon Stream, had moderate genetic diversity (HO = 0.659).
Analysis using Fisher’s exact test revealed that all populations except the YD (2012) and MG (2008) populations deviated from HWE (P < 0.05). The range of inbreeding coefficients was − 0.019 to 0.102 in the entire population, with high inbreeding signals for the OC (0.102), YD (0.083), and UC (0.096) populations (P < 0.001).
Recent bottleneck estimations showed that all populations experienced bottlenecks in the infinite allele model (P < 0.05). The MG (2019) and ND population bottlenecks were statistically significant (P < 0.05) in both the infinite allele model and stepwise mutation model. Mode-shift analysis revealed evidence of a bottleneck in the MG (2008) population.
The M-ratio, representing historical bottlenecks, ranged from 0.440 to 0.482 in all populations; Garza and Williamson56 suggested that values < 0.68 indicate evidence of a bottleneck. All populations experienced bottlenecks from previous generations to the present (M < 0.68). Effective population size ranged from 52 (MG 2008) to 301 (OC) (Table 2. The effective population size of the YD (2019 population was 190; the effective population size of YD (2012 could not be estimated. The effective population size of MG (2019 increased to 236 from 52 (MG 2008. However, these results are presumably errors related to the size of the sampled populations; Ne did not reach a size sufficient to maintain the minimum viable population (Ne < 1000).
Population structure and estimation of gene flow
Table 3 shows the results of genetic distance and genetic differentiation analyses using microsatellite markers. For all populations, the between-population genetic distance ranged from 0.016 to 0.136; it was high between MG and the remaining seven populations (pairwise distance > 0.112, pairwise genetic differentiation > 0.135). Notably, the YD (2019) and JJ populations showed the greatest genetic distance and differentiation from the MG (2019) population (pairwise distance > 0.136, pairwise genetic differentiation > 0.161). However, the geographically isolated UC population of the Ungcheoncheon Stream water system showed very low genetic differentiation from populations of the Geumgang River water system, except for the MG (2019) population. Although there generally were large genetic differences between geographically isolated populations, the UC population appeared to be similar to the Geumgang River water system population because of low genetic distance and genetic divergence. This result suggests that the nine populations can be divided into two groups: Geumgang River and Ungcheoncheon Stream water system population vs. Mangyeonggang River water system population.
PCoA and DAPC plots showed that the nine populations were divided into two groups, similar to the results of genetic differentiation (Fig. 2). The first group consisted of the populations of the Geumgang River and Ungcheoncheon Stream water systems, whereas the second group consisted of the MG (2019 and 2008) populations (Fig. 2). Except for MG (2019), the PCoA and DAPC results of the Geumgang River and Ungcheoncheon Stream water systems appeared to be divided into three groups. The first group comprised the OC, ND, JJ, CG, YD (2019), and YD (2012) populations; the second group comprised the JJ population; and the third group comprised the CG population.
The optimal number of populations (K) for all populations was determined to be K = 2, according to the Bayesian clustering method in STRUCTURE (Fig. 3). The populations were assigned to two groups: the Geumgang River and Ungcheoncheon Stream water systems [OC, ND, CG, YD (2019), JJ, and UC], and the remaining MG (2019 and 2008) populations. The STRUCTURE results for the Geumgang River and Ungcheoncheon Stream water system populations showed K = 3, although genotypes were mixed.
Based on these overall results (genetic distance, PCoA, DAPC, FST, and STRUCTURE), the Geumgang River population [OC, ND, CG, YD (2019 and 2012), JJ], UC population, and Mangyeonggang River population [MG (2019 and 2008)] were separated and AMOVA was performed. AMOVA of the entire group divided the nine populations into two groups; the within-group variation was 86.23%, and the between-group variation was 11.26%. A significant genetic difference was present between the two groups at FST = 0.060 (P < 0.001).
When the Geumgang River and Ungcheoncheon Stream water systems were regarded as three groups, the within-group variation was 96.77%, and the between-group variation was 1.29% (Table 4). There was no significant between-group variance (FCT = 0.013, P > 0.05). The genetic variation between the Geumgang River and UC populations was lower than that between the MG and Geumgang River and UC populations, suggesting that the genetic variation between the Geumgang and UC populations was not large.
Genetic flow was plotted using BayesAss software (Fig. 4). The highest migration rate was observed in the UC population; rates were 0.263 in the OC population, 0.267 in the ND population, 0.278 in the CG population, and 0.275 in the YD (2019) population. Our gene flow and dispersal results suggest that there is migration in the Geumgang River water system populations toward the UC population.
The genetic flow among populations, except for gene flow to the UC population, ranged from 0.003 to 0.031; these findings demonstrated that most gene flow occurred within each population, rather than among populations (Fig. 4). Overall, these results indicated isolation and the absence of genetic flow among populations, with the exception of the UC population.
ABC analysis was performed to determine the origin of the UC population of P. nigra (Fig. 5). Scenario 3, in which the UC population was derived from the Geumgang River population, showed the highest posterior probability of 0.9077 (Table 5). Scenarios in which the population was derived from the Mangyeonggang River (Scenario 1) or from both the Geumgang and Mangyeonggang Rivers (Scenario 2) had very low posterior probabilities (0.0009 and 0.0914).
Discussion
In this study, P. nigra, an endemic and endangered fish in Korea, was subjected to analyses of genetic diversity and population structure in nine populations based on 21 microsatellite loci. The entire global population of the black shinner species inhabits only a small portion of the Korean peninsula; thus, conservation efforts and interests are high. Accordingly, this genetic study of endangered P. nigra provides essential genetic structure information for conservation.
Genetic diversity and bottlenecks
Generally, endangered species tend to have low genetic diversity because of various factors such as genetic drift or inbreeding14,67. However, in the present study, despite its endangered species status, P. nigra had high genetic diversity similar to other freshwater fish. Kim et al.45 found similar results, with AFLP having higher genetic diversity than other endangered species (lksookimia choii, average genetic diversity: 0.086). Similar to the present study, high genetic diversity was observed in the freshwater and endangered fishes Percocypris pingi, yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco), roughskin sculpin (Trachidermus fasciatus), and golden mahseer (Tor putitora)38,68,69,70. Genetic diversity allows species to adapt and survive in changing environments by counteracting the effects of genetic drift71. Species with high genetic diversity are likely to maintain their high genetic diversity, even if they are endangered, unless the population size declines through events such as habitat destruction68. Therefore, it is presumed that high genetic diversity is maintained at the species level due to the wide distribution and high abundance of Geumgang River populations compared to the other populations.
We found high genetic diversity at the species level, but low genetic diversity in the MG (2019 and 2008) populations. The amplified fragment length polymorphism results of Kim et al.45 also supported these findings. Kim et al.45 found that MG populations have low genetic diversity and require genetic management. Because the MG population is geographically independent from the Geumgang River water system population and has a narrow geographical distribution compared with the Geumgang River water system population, it has a potential risk of genetic diversity loss. Therefore, for genetic management, the population should be augmented by breeding genetically identical MG populations.
In contrast, the UC population did not exhibit low genetic diversity similar to the Mangyeonggang River water system, although it is also a geographically independent population. P. nigra in the Ungcheoncheon Stream water system has been previously extinct and subsequently restored. There is no official record of the breeding population used to restore the Ungcheoncheon Stream water system, although the Geumgang River water system population was reportedly used. Therefore, the high genetic diversity of the UC population may be related to this aspect of restoration. A possible conservation strategy would be to augment populations with high genetic diversity. Although the UC population is genetically diverse because it lives in two small regions, the long-term effects of inbreeding cannot be ignored. Therefore, population augmentation is necessary to increase the genetic diversity of the population and reduce inbreeding.
The M-ratio and heterozygosity methods can detect genetic bottlenecks over long and short periods of time, respectively56,72. In the present study, all populations of P. nigra had recently experienced bottlenecks; the estimated M-ratio was below the critical value (M = 0.68), confirming signs of historical bottlenecks in all populations. The populations of P. nigra may have been affected by anthropogenic activities, such as the construction of dams and weirs in their habitat, which may have caused recent bottlenecks. However, the analysis of bottlenecks can produce biased results due to differences in population size, gene flow, number of samples, and number of loci. Thus, a larger number of samples should be analyzed using a more reliable assay. However, the indications of bottlenecks in the present study suggest that conservation efforts are needed in current populations.
Genetic monitoring of the YD and MG populations revealed increased genetic diversity over time. These results may have been biased because of the small number of samples. The consequences of these biases can be minimized with more sampling strategies and should be carefully considered for future results. Because the monitoring of populations with low genetic diversity is important for species conservation, continuous genetic monitoring must be conducted to conserve and enhance the gene pool.
Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium assumes that the number of frequencies remains constant from one generation to the next. This principle is based on five assumptions: no mutations occur, no migration occurs, the population is infinitely large, mating is random, and natural selection does not occur73.
Deviations from HWE can affect these assumptions and microsatellite alleles vary considerably in size, leading to scoring errors due to limitations of markers and sizing techniques73. OC, YD, and UC have a significant FIS, indicating that random breeding is unlikely to have occurred. Therefore, deviations from the HWE may occur. Inbreeding increases the probability of lethal genes because of genetic homozygosity and genetic diversity loss, hindering population maintenance43,44. Because genetic diversity is high, short-term effects may not be significant, however, continuous inbreeding causes inbreeding depression, resulting in the loss of genetic diversity and hindering active adaptation to environmental changes14. MG (2018) found that FIS appears as a negative coefficient, indicating the possibility of outbreeding. This may have caused the deviation from the HWE. JJ ND, and CG could not find allelic stuttering, excessive heterozygosity, or homozygosity causing HWE deviation. A sufficient sample size is needed to prevent errors due to these HWE dropouts; therefore, it is necessary to obtain samples from different groups and ages at a single time point.
The M-ratio can detect genetic bottlenecks over a longer period of time, whereas heterozygosity methods can detect bottlenecks over shorter intervals56,72. In this study, all populations of P. nigra had recently experienced bottlenecks; the estimated M-ratio was also below the critical value (M = 0.68), confirming signs of historical bottlenecks in all populations. All populations of P. nigra may have been affected by anthropogenic activities such as the construction of dams and weirs in their habitat, which may have caused recent bottlenecks. However, the detection of bottlenecks can have biased results related to population size, gene flow, number of samples, and number of loci. Thus, there is a need to analyze a larger number of samples for a more reliable assay. However, indications of bottlenecks in this study suggest that conservation efforts are needed in current populations.
Effective population size (Ne) randomly fluctuates according to population survival and reproduction, such that smaller population size increases the likelihood of extinction over time (Harmon and Braude74). Populations with a small effective population size have a higher proportion of deaths attributable to the same individual, compared with populations that have a large population size. Thus, the loss of genetic diversity is greater in populations with small effective population sizes. Geographically isolated populations increase rates of inbreeding. Importantly, inbreeding causes inbreeding depression; to avoid this, an Ne value of > 100 (N < 5 generations) has been suggested75. In the present study, the Ne value was < 100 in the UC and CG groups; thus, efforts to avoid inbreeding depression are needed. In particular, because the UC population exhibits a significant inbreeding coefficient, an active conservation strategy is required. Although the UC population is highly genetically diverse, it inhabits two small regions in the water system; therefore, the long-term effects of inbreeding cannot be ignored. Therefore, population expansion is necessary to increase the genetic diversity of the population and reduce inbreeding.
Frankham et al.75 suggested that Ne > 1000 is needed to maintain evolutionary potential; in all populations of P. nigra, Ne was in the range of 52–301. The species is unlikely to become extinct in the near future but may lose its ability to evolve over time, thus limiting its long-term survival75. Therefore, conservation and restoration efforts are suggested for specific populations, as well as all resident populations to maintain their evolutionary potential.
Genetic structure and gene flow for wild and restoration populations
The nine populations were divided into two water system groups based on genetic structure; DAPC, PCoA, and genetic differentiation indices also supported this population structure (Figs. 2 and 3). An understanding of fish population structure is essential for conservation76,77. The MG population was clearly distinct from the Geumgang River water system populations and exhibited genetic differentiation. The populations of the Geumgang River and Mangyeonggang River were geographically separated, which led to genetic differentiation, consistent with the findings in previous studies45.
The six populations [OC, ND, YD (2019 and 2012), JJ, and CG] of the Geumgang River water system are connected and exhibit minimal genetic differentiation from each other. Notably, despite its geographical independence, the UC population exhibited minimal genetic difference from the Geumgang River water system populations. This observation was supported by the AMOVA findings of very low genetic variation between the Geumgang River and Ungcheoncheon Stream water system populations.
The UC population has a history of reintroduction after extinction in an area. At the time of restoration, it was reintroduced using fish from the Geumgang River water system population, although this approach has not been confirmed by official records. ABC analysis strongly supported a scenario in which the UC population originated from the Geumgang River population.
Additionally, we observed gene flow among the seven populations, which supported our hypothesis regarding the origin of the UC population (restoration population). The observed gene flow moved from the four Geumgang River water system populations (OC, YD (2019), CG, and ND) to the UC population. Only one Geumgang River water system population, the JJ population, did not show evidence of migrating to the UC population, suggesting that the UC population was derived from the other four populations.
With the exception of the UC population, gene flow existed only within each group; there was almost no gene flow among the UC, MG, and JJ populations. The five populations in the Geumgang River water system showed no evidence of genetic connectivity despite geographical connection. A possible explanation is that gene flow among these populations has been interrupted through the construction of dams and weirs, which presumably caused habitat fragmentation (Fig. 1). An alternative explanation is that there is a one-way connection from upstream to downstream within the Geumgang River water system populations. Generally, the flow of genes within a river is from upstream to downstream, which is the direction of drainage78. However, no downstream unidirectional gene flow was observed in this study, although this may be related to sampling bias. In the present study, the JJ, ND, CG, and YD population habitats were tributaries of the main Geumgang River,upstream gene flow was blocked by dams and weirs. Despite this blockage of upstream flow, downstream movement remains possible. BayesAss software only detects migrations of recent generations; thus, the small number of samples may have hindered the detection of obvious gene shifts. Although each population within the Geumgang River water system could move freely before interruption by dams and weirs, the habitat fragmentation caused by their creation may accelerate population extinction14. Therefore, considering the results of inbreeding and effective population size among fragmented populations, conservation should be prioritized.
Conservation implications
P. nigra lives in the Geumgang River, Mangyeonggang River, and Ungcheoncheon Stream water system in Korea; it practices brood parasitism in the spawning grounds of C. herzi. P. nigra cannot reproduce where C. herzi does not live27,79. Dams and dikes have been constructed in all habitats of this species, and it has already been exterminated once in the Ungcheoncheon Stream water system because of anthropogenic activities. Therefore, a reintroduction strategy was used to restore the Ungcheoncheon Stream water system population, resulting in successful restoration.
Endangered species conservation is intended to increase effective population size by maintaining genetic diversity and improving gene flow70. Despite these efforts, the lack of genetic information regarding the UC population has prevented effective conservation planning. Additionally, the genetic structures of the Geumgang River and Mangyeonggang River water system populations were not identified, hindering the selection of populations for restoration and the identification of populations that require conservation. Lack of prior knowledge regarding these genetic structures is a potential threat that could hasten species extinction through delayed conservation management strategies14,38,67.
To restore the UC population, fish were artificially propagated using the Geumgang River water system population, which was the most representative population; however, source of the Geumgang River water system population is unknown. Therefore, microsatellite markers were developed to identify P. nigra genetic diversity and population structure46. In the present study, the genetic structures of the nine populations were determined to provide basic information for use in the selection of priority conservation populations. The UC, OC, and YD populations have high genetic diversity, but the inbreeding issue should be addressed. Additionally, the CG, JJ, and ND populations have a disconnected genetic flow, indicating that conservation efforts require improvement. Because the MG population is a genetically differentiated population, strategies are needed to increase the size of the current effective population and preserve its habitat. Additionally, genetic markers such as single-nucleotide polymorphisms and larger sampling strategies can improve assessments of genetic structure and genetic diversity in newly discovered populations, facilitating the formulation of appropriate conservation plans. Ultimately, the management of inbreeding issues and maintenance of appropriate genetic diversity are essential for the continued conservation of P. nigra; our results provide the basic information needed for efficient conservation efforts.
Data availability
All genotypes and related information were available upon request to the authors (e-mail: kimkangrae9586@gmail.com).
References
Butchart, S. H. et al. Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines. Science 328, 1164–1168 (2010).
Collen, B. et al. Global patterns of freshwater species diversity, threat and endemism. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 40–51 (2014).
Dudgeon, D. et al. Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol. Rev. 81, 163–182 (2006).
Cincotta, R. P., Wisnewski, J. & Engelman, R. Human population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature 404, 990–992 (2000).
Lakra, W. S. et al. Fish diversity, habitat ecology and their conservation and management issues of a tropical River in Ganga basin, India. Environmentalist 30, 306–319 (2010).
Sala, O. E. et al. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287, 1770–1774 (2000).
Gehrke, P. C., Gilligan, D. M. & Barwick, M. Changes in fish communities of the Shoalhaven River 20 years after construction of Tallowa Dam, Australia. River Res. Appl. 18, 265–286 (2002).
Meador, M. R. & Goldstein, R. M. Assessing water quality at large geographic scales: Relations among land use, water physicochemistry, riparian condition, and fish community structure. Environ. Manag. 31, 0504–0517 (2003).
Poff, N. L. & Allan, J. D. Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrological variability. Ecology 76, 606–627 (1995).
Funk, W. C., McKay, J. K., Hohenlohe, P. A. & Allendorf, F. W. Harnessing genomics for delineating conservation units. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 489–496 (2012).
Harrisson, K. A., Pavlova, A., Telonis-Scott, M. & Sunnucks, P. Using genomics to characterize evolutionary potential for conservation of wild populations. Evol. Appl. 7, 1008–1025 (2014).
Moyle, L. C., Stinchcombe, J. R., Hudgens, B. R. & Morris, W. F. Conservation genetics in the recovery of endangered animal species: A review of US endangered species recovery plans (1977–1998). Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 26, 85–95 (2003).
Pierson, J. C. et al. Genetic factors in threatened species recovery plans on three continents. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 433–440 (2016).
Frankham, R. Genetics and extinction. Biol. Conserv. 126, 131–140 (2005).
Namkoong, G. Genetic conservation strategies: Who needs data? In Forest Genetics and Sustainability (ed. Mátyás, Csaba) 211–216 (Springer, 1999).
Pavlova, A. et al. Severe consequences of habitat fragmentation on genetic diversity of an endangered Australian freshwater fish: A call for assisted gene flow. Evol. Appl. 10, 531–550 (2017).
Taylor, H. R., Dussex, N. & Van Heezik, Y. Bridging the conservation genetics gap by identifying barriers to implementation for conservation practitioners. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 10, 231–242 (2017).
Bezerra, I. M. et al. Genetic diversity and gene flow of the threatened Brazilian endemic parrotfish Scarus trispinosus (Valenciennes, 1840). Mar. Environ. Res. 142, 155–162 (2018).
Chistiakov, D. A., Hellemans, B. & Volckaert, F. A. Microsatellites and their genomic distribution, evolution, function and applications: A review with special reference to fish genetics. Aquaculture 255, 1–29 (2006).
Chen, L. et al. Microsatellite variation and significant population genetic structure of endangered finless porpoises (Neophocaena phocaenoides) in Chinese coastal waters and the Yangtze River. Mar. Biol. 157, 1453–1462 (2010).
Goossens, B. et al. Patterns of genetic diversity and migration in increasingly fragmented and declining orang-utan (Pongo pygmaeus) populations from Sabah, Malaysia. Mol. Ecol. 14, 441–456 (2005).
Huang, X., Börner, A., Röder, M. & Ganal, M. Assessing genetic diversity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm using microsatellite markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105, 699–707 (2002).
Huey, J. A. et al. Genetic structure and effective population size of the most northern population of the Australian river blackfish, Gadopsis marmoratus (Richardson 1848): Implications for long-term population viability. Freshw. Sci. 36, 113–123 (2017).
Liu, S., Cantrell, R. G., McCarty, J. C. Jr. & Stewart, J. M. Simple sequence repeat–based assessment of genetic diversity in cotton race stock accessions. Crop Sci. 40, 1459–1469 (2000).
Schwartz, M. K., Luikart, G. & Waples, R. S. Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 25–33 (2007).
Williamson-Natesan, E. G. Comparison of methods for detecting bottlenecks from microsatellite loci. Conserv. Genet. 6, 551–562 (2005).
Choi, J. Y., Chang, H. & Kim, S. K. Distribution pattern and brood parasitism characteristics of an endangered fish, Pseudopungtungia nigra, in the Geum River Basin, South Korea. Fishes 7, 321 (2022).
Kim, I. S. & Park, J. Y. Freshwater Fishes of Korea 1–456 (Kyohak, 2002).
Ministry of Environment. Wildlife protection and management act (Law No. 10977). http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=125808&viewCls=lsRvsDocInfoR# (2012).
Ministry of Environment. Technology for Utilization and Control of Ecosystem 1–537 (Kunsan, 2006).
Bristol, R. M. et al. Comparison of historical bottleneck effects and genetic consequences of re-introduction in a critically endangered island passerine. Mol. Ecol. 22, 4644–4662 (2013).
Vrijenhoek, R. C. et al. Conservation genetics of endangered fish populations in Arizona. Science 229, 400–402 (1985).
Bijlsma, R., Bundgaard, J. & Boerema, A. C. Does inbreeding affect the extinction risk of small populations?: Predictions from Drosophila. J. Evol. Biol. 13, 502–514 (2000).
Keller, L. F. & Waller, D. M. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 230–241 (2002).
Frankham, R. Inbreeding in the wild really does matter. Heredity 104, 124 (2010).
Rosenfeld, J. S. 50/500 or 100/1000? Reconciling short-and long-term recovery targets and MVPs. Biol. Conserv. 176, 287–288 (2014).
Laikre, L., Palm, S. & Ryman, N. Genetic population structure of fishes: Implications for coastal zone management. AMBIO A J. Hum. Environ. 34, 111–119 (2005).
Li, X. et al. Genetic diversity and structure analysis of Percocypris pingi (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae): Implications for conservation and hatchery release in the Yalong River. PLoS One 11, e0166769 (2016).
Frankham, R. Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: A review. Genet. Res. 66, 95–107 (1995).
Sokal, R. R., Jacquez, G. M. & Wooten, M. C. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of migration and selection. Genetics 121, 845–855 (1989).
Fluker, B. L., Kuhajda, B. R. & Harris, P. M. The effects of riverine impoundment on genetic structure and gene flow in two stream fishes in the Mobile River basin. Freshw. Biol. 59, 526–543 (2014).
Tanaka, Y. Extinction of populations by inbreeding depression under stochastic environments. Popul. Ecol. 42, 55–62 (2000).
Willi, Y., Van Buskirk, J. & Hoffmann, A. A. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37, 433–458 (2006).
Wright, L. I., Tregenza, T. & Hosken, D. J. Inbreeding, inbreeding depression and extinction. Conserv. Genet. 9, 833–843 (2008).
Kim, K. S. et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of the endangered fish Pseudopungtungia nigra (Cyprinidae) from the geum and Mankyung Rivers assessed by amplified fragment length polymorphism. Korean J. Ichthyol. 21, 76–80 (2009).
Bang, I. C. et al. Microsatellite records for volume 12, issue 2. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 12, 337–351 (2020).
Van Oosterhout, C., Hutchinson, W. F., Wills, D. P. & Shipley, P. MICRO-CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4, 535–538 (2004).
Marshall, T. C., Slate, J. B. K. E., Kruuk, L. E. B. & Pemberton, J. M. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7, 639–655 (1998).
Goudet, J. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html (2001).
Raymond, M. Population genetics software for exact test and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86, 248–249 (1995).
Excoffier, L. & Lischer, H. E. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10, 564–567 (2010).
Piry, S., Luikart, G. & Cornuet, J. M. Computer note. BOTTLENECK: A computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective size using allele frequency data. J. Hered. 90, 502–503 (1999).
Maruyama, T. & Fuerst, P. A. Population bottlenecks and nonequilibrium models in population genetics. II. Number of alleles in a small population that was formed by a recent bottleneck. Genetics 111, 675–689 (1985).
Cornuet, J. M. & Luikart, G. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144, 2001–2014 (1996).
Luikart, G. & Cornuet, J. M. Empirical evaluation of a test for identifying recently bottlenecked populations from allele frequency data. Conserv. Biol. 12, 228–237 (1998).
Garza, J. C. & Williamson, E. G. Detection of reduction in population size using data from microsatellite loci. Mol. Ecol. 10, 305–318 (2001).
Waples, R. S. & Do, C. H. I. LDNE: A program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8, 753–756 (2008).
Nei, M. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106, 283–292 (1972).
Piry, S. et al. GENECLASS2: A software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. J. Hered. 95, 536–539 (2004).
Peakall, R. O. D. & Smouse, P. E. GENALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6, 288–295 (2006).
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959 (2000).
Earl, D. A. & VonHoldt, B. M. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 4, 359–361 (2012).
Jombart, T. adegenet: A R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24, 1403–1405 (2008).
Wilson, G. A. & Rannala, B. Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163, 1177–1191 (2003).
Cornuet, J. M. et al. DIYABC v2. 0: A software to make approximate Bayesian computation inferences about population history using single nucleotide polymorphism, DNA sequence and microsatellite data. Bioinformatics 30, 1187–1189 (2014).
Kim, K.S. Studies on Conservation Genetics of Endangered Gobioninae Fishes in Korea. Chungcheongnam-do Soonchunhyang University, 1–208 (Soonchunhyang University, 2012).
Sharma, S. P. et al. Microsatellite analysis reveals low genetic diversity in managed populations of the critically endangered gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) in India. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–10 (2021).
Guo, X. Z., Chen, H. M., Wang, A. B. & Qian, X. Q. Population genetic structure of the yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco) in China inferred from microsatellite analyses: Implications for fisheries management and breeding. J. World Aquac. Soc. 53, 174–191 (2022).
Li, Y. L., Xue, D. X., Gao, T. X. & Liu, J. X. Genetic diversity and population structure of the roughskin sculpin (Trachidermus fasciatus Heckel) inferred from microsatellite analyses: Implications for its conservation and management. Conserv. Genet. 17, 921–930 (2016).
Yadav, P., Kumar, A., Hussain, S. A. & Gupta, S. K. Evaluation of the effect of longitudinal connectivity in population genetic structure of endangered golden mahseer, Tor putitora (Cyprinidae), in Himalayan rivers: Implications for its conservation. PLoS One 15, e0234377 (2020).
Hughes, A. R. et al. Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecol. Lett. 11, 609–623 (2008).
Swatdipong, A., Primmer, C. R. & Vasemägi, A. Historical and recent genetic bottlenecks in European grayling, Thymallus thymallus. Conserv. Genet. 11, 279–292 (2010).
Morin, P. A. et al. Significant deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium caused by low levels of microsatellite genotyping errors. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 9, 498–504 (2009).
Harmon, L. J. & Braude, S. Conservation of small populations: Effective population sizes, inbreeding, and the 50/500 rule. In An Introduction to Methods and Models in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology (eds Braude, S. & Low, B. S.) 125–138 (Princeton University Press, 2010).
Frankham, R., Bradshaw, C. J. & Brook, B. W. Genetics in conservation management: Revised recommendations for the 50/500 rules, Red List criteria and population viability analyses. Biol. Conserv. 170, 56–63 (2014).
Cope, W. R. et al. Genetic structure and diversity of the endemic Carolina Madtom and conservation implications. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 41, S27–S41 (2021).
Piorski, N. M. et al. Contribution of conservation genetics in assessing neotropical freshwater fish biodiversity. Braz. J. Biol. 68, 1039–1050 (2008).
Yamazaki, Y., Yamano, A. & Oura, K. Recent microscale disturbance of gene flow in threatened fluvial lamprey, Lethenteron sp. N, living in a paddy water system. Conserv. Genet. 12, 1373–1377 (2011).
Kim, K. R. et al. The complete mitochondrial genome of the hybrid species Pungtungia herzi (♀)× Pseudopungtungia nigra (♂) from Korea. Mitochondrial DNA B 6, 962–964 (2021).
Funding
This work was supported by Hankooktire & Technology Co., Ltd (Seoul, Korea), Soonchunhyang University (20190385), and National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2021R1A6A1A03039503].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.-R.K.: conceptualization and data curation, formal analysis, writing–original draft, writing–review, and editing. Y.-H.K.: data curation. M.-S.S.: conceptualization, sampling, and investigation, and editing. S.-J.C.: conceptualization, and editing, sampling and investigation. I.-C.B.: conceptualization, data curation, supervision, funding acquisition, project administration, writing–review, and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, KR., Kwak, YH., Sung, MS. et al. Population structure and genetic diversity of the endangered fish black shinner Pseudopungtungia nigra (Cyprinidae) in Korea: a wild and restoration population. Sci Rep 13, 9692 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36569-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36569-4
- Springer Nature Limited