Abstract
A total of 50 lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolates from Iranian traditional dairy products (Motal and Lighvan cheeses, and artisanal yogurt) were screened for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) production. Firstly, a rapid colorimetric test was performed to evaluate the glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) activity among the LAB isolates examined. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was then performed on selected strains to identify isolates with high/moderate GABA producing capacity, and a GABase micro-titer plate assay was employed to quantify GABA. Finally, two Lactococcus (Lac.) lactis strains were selected for GABA production optimization via Response Surface Methodology (RSM) following Central Composite Design (CCD). Forty-one out of the 50 isolates showed GAD activity according to the colorimetric assay. Eight isolates displayed strong GAD activity, while nine showed no activity; low to moderate GAD activity was scored for all other isolates. GABA production was confirmed by TLC in all isolates with high GAD activity and in four selected among isoaltes with moderate activity. Among the Lactococcus strains tested, Lac. lactis 311 and Lac. lactis 491 were the strongest GABA producers with amounts of 3.3 and 1.26 mM, respectively. These two strains were subjected to GABA production optimization applying RSM and CCD on three key variables: Monosodium glutamate concentration (MSG) (between 25 and 150 mM), incubation temperature (between 25 and 37 °C), and pH (between 4.0 and 5.0). Optimal conditions for GABA production by Lac. lactis 311 and Lac. lactis 491 of temperature, pH and MSG concentration were, respectively, 35.4 and 30 °C, pH 4.5 and 4.6, and MSG concentration of 89 and 147.4 mM, respectively. Under the above conditions, the amount of GABA produced by Lac. lactis 311 and Lac. lactis 491 was 0.395 and 0.179 mg/mL, respectively. These strains and the optimal culture conditions determined in this study could be used for the biotechnological production of GABA or applied in food fermentations for the development of naturally GABA-enriched foods.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are among the most essential and common Gram-positive bacteria which are not only widely distributed in nature and naturally exist in traditional fermented foods, but also extensively involved in industrial food fermentations due to having a reputation of being “Generally Recognized As Safe” (GRAS). The use of pure cultures of lactic acid bacteria for fermentation of cucumbers, cabbage, olives, and other products has been explored for several decades with varying degrees of success. However, at present pure cultures are exploited only on a limited commercial scale for these commodities1,2,3,4. LAB also offer special functions that are considered beneficial, such as antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, as well as the formation of bioactive compounds such as, among others, peptides, organic acids, and short-chain fatty acids5,6,7,8,9. Because of their significant beneficial effects, there are currently noteworthy researches on LAB and attract many industrial interest10. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is considered as one of the well-known bioactive compounds; it is a four-carbon, non-protein amino acid formed by different organisms including microorganisms, plants, and animals3,11,12. This amino acid-derived compound serves as the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system and, as such, it leds to hypotension, contributes to gut-to-brain signaling and has tranquilizer effects7,13,14,15,16. Several studies show that GABA contributes to other physiological functions, such as regulating of sleeplessness and depression, enhancing the plasma level of growth hormone, controlling the quorum-sensing systems by acting as a signal molecule between eukaryote cells and pathogens, reducing the inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis10,17,18,19. As a bioactive compound, the application of GABA varies from pharmaceuticals to functional fermented foods20. Therefore, it is an ever-growing demand for highly effective GABA biosynthesis, and hence, substantial efforts have been made in this field. Biological methods applying microorganisms are more promising; thus many GABA-enriched products are obtained by fermentation21,22,23,24,25. Biosynthesis of GABA from glutamate occurs by the action of the glutamate decarboxylase (GAD), a pyridoxal 5-phosphate-dependant enzyme (EC 4.1.1.15) that is responsible for the conversion of L-glutamate into GABA3,24. The wide distribution of GAD among eukaryotes (plants, animals, and fungal strains) and prokaryotes has been reported by several studies26,27. However, LAB, besides all beneficial and technological properties, have been introduced as the most promising group of microorganisms in which they are capable of producing a high level of GABA due to high GAD activity28. The effort to screen for new GABA-producing LAB still attracts attention, though numerous strains have already been isolated and characterized. Thus, it seems that further research on the isolation and characterization of GABA-producing LAB is demanded to provide novel starters for the nutraceutical and functional fermented foods industry10. The diversity of new GABA-enriched foods ranges from cereal-based to dairy-fermented products, including sourdough, bread, cheese, fermented tea and vegetables, traditional Asian fermented foods, and dairy and soy products1,29. As mentioned above, by further screening, the isolation sources should be diversified as much as possible, including traditional fermented foods to achieve new GABA-producing LAB strains. This leads to a more comprehensive application area and higher flexibility of starter cultures11. According to the literature, raw milk cheeses have been identified as a valuable source of microbial biodiversity and new LAB strains with health-promoting properties14. Though currently, there are several different types of researches and industrial interest in the biological examination of the potential of traditional dairy LAB30,31,32. So far, no GABA-producing LAB have been reported from Iranian traditional fermented foods. Recently Azizi et al. (2017) have claimed that most of the isolates from Motal cheese could be used as starters or adjunct-starters in novel fermented functional foods. Besides having antimicrobial properties33, the production of bioactive compounds, such as GABA, could potentially substantiate the functionality claimed for such cultures.
Hence, the present study aims to screen for GABA-producing LAB from various Motal and Lighvan cheeses and yogurt samples which are among the preeminent and most appreciated traditional Iranian dairy products.
Materials and Methods
Chemical and Media
The commercial GABase kit and all chemicals such as NADP + (Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate), α-ketoglutarate, monosodium glutamate (MSG), Triton X-100®, and GABA were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). M17 and de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) broth media were obtained from Quelab (Quelab Laboratories Inc., Canada).
LAB strains and growth conditions
A total of 50 LAB isolates previously isolated from Iranian traditional dairy products (Motal cheese33, Lighvan cheeses31,34, and Iranian yogurt35), identified using molecular techniques and 16S rRNA gene sequencing, were screened for GABA production (Table 1). All examined isolates, including lactobacilli (Lactobacillus, Lactiplantibacillus, and Levilactobacillus) (27 isolates), Lactococcus (20 isolates), and Streptococcus (3 isolates), were kept frozen in MRS (lactobacilli) or M17 (lactococci and streptococci) broth with 15% glycerol at -80 °C. Pre-cultures were made by adding 20 µL of stock culture to 10 mL fresh medium. Lactobacilli strains were grown in MRS medium, while M17 medium was used for lactococci and Streptococcus (St.) thermophilus strains. Based on the types, incubations were done at 30 or 37ºC for 24–48 h under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.
Qualification screening of LAB isolates
Determination of GAD activity
Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) assay is a rapid colorimetric test used to assess the GABA-producing potential among LAB isolates. Sample preparation for GAD activity determination was done as described by Lacroix et al.36. An overnight grown culture of each isolate (5 mL) was washed with 0.9% (w/v) NaCl solution and centrifuged at 5000 × g (20 min, 25 ºC). Cells were suspended in 500 µL of GAD reagent solution (pH = 4), which consists of L-glutamic acid (1 g), Triton X-100 (300 µL), NaCl (90 g), and bromocresol green (0.05 g) in 1 L deionized water. After anaerobic incubation for 4 h at 37ºC, GAD activity was visually examined by color change. The development of a greenish or blueish color was considered as low or high GAD activity, respectively. However, no color change (yellow) was considered with no activity36.
Thin layer chromatography (TLC)
To identify isolates with high and moderate GABA producing ability, a TLC assay was performed as described by Lee et al.37. Briefly, strains were inoculated in their respective broth medium supplemented with 0.5% monosodium glutamate (MSG) and incubated at their optimal temperature for 24 h. To test the presence of GABA, supernatants were collected by centrifugation (8000 × g, 4ºC, 5 min) and then 2 µL of each filtered supernatant was spotted on a TLC plate (Silica gel 60 F254). TLC was conducted using n-butanol:acetic acid:water ratio of 5:2:2 (v/v/v). The silica gel plate was subsequently developed by spraying with a 2% ninhydrin solution and heating at 105ºC for 5 min.
DNA extraction and strain typing by rep-PCR
Total genomic DNA was extracted from GABA-producing isolates using a commercial kit (High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit; Roche, Basel, Switzerland), following the manufacturer’s instructions. To assess the interspecies diversity between isolates, repetitive extragenic profiling PCR (rep-PCR) was done using BoxA2R (5´-ACGTGGTTTGAAGAGATTTTCG-3´) as reported by Koeuth et al.38. In brief, reactions were performed in 25 µL volume containing 2 µL purified DNA, 12.5 µL Red master mix (Ampliqon, Odense, Denmark), 9.3 µL Nuclease-free water, and 1.2 µL of the primer. Thermal conditions were as follows: an initial step of denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation and annealing at 94 °C for 29 s, 40 °C for 1 min, and at 68 °C for 8 min; with a final extension at 68 °C for 10 min. PCR products were then electrophoresed using 1.5% agarose (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) gel at 75 V for 90 min. DNA safe stain (0.75 µL/100 mL) (Sina Clon Bio Science, Tehran, Iran) was used for visualization of the gel and the bands photographed under UV light by Gel Doc System. The similarity of the patterns was expressed by the Simple Matching (SM) coefficient, and the clustering was performed using the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) method, with the Multivariate Statistical Package (MVSP) software version 3.13d31.
GABA determination
Quantitative measurment of GABA in broth medium was done by a GABase microtiter plate assay as described by Tsukatani et al.39. Bacterial isolates were grown in MRS broth medium containing 0.5% MSG for 2 days at their optimal growth temperature. The reactive mixture contained 750 mM sodium sulfate, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 1.4 mM NADP + , 2.0 mM α-ketoglutarate in Tris–HCl buffer (80 mM, pH 9.0) and GABA-T (Gamma-aminobutyrate glutamate aminotransferase) (Sigma-Aldrich). The mixture was added to each well (in a 96-well microtiter plate) in a final volume of 90 µL. The initial absorbance was read at 340 nm with a microplate reader (BioTek, ELX 808) before adding a 10 µL sample of a standard GABA solution. The substrate of NADP + turns to NADPH in the presence of GABA and α-ketoglutarate after incubation at 30-37ºC for 1 h. To calculate the GABA content formed by each isolate, the difference between initial and final absorbances at 340 nm was compared to standard curves of calibrated GABA solutions.
Optimization of GABA production using response surface methodology (RSM)
Optimization of GABA production in MRS medium and studying the interaction of key parameters were done using response surface methodology (RSM). A Central Composite Design (CCD) of RSM was applied to optimize the 3 effective variables: MSG concentration (between 25 and 150 mM), incubation temperature (from 25 to 37 °C), and pH (4.0–5.0). Varying these three independent parameters, a total of 20 experiments for each isolate were designed and performed. The statistical software Design Expert 10.0.7.0 was used for data analysis12,40. Laboratory-scale fermentations were set up to investigate optimal parameters for GABA production by selected isolates. Bacterial isolates were inoculated into falcon tubes containing 50 mL MRS broth medium with different concentrations of MSG with initial pH adjustment and incubated at different temperatures for 48 h to reach optimum GABA production. After 48 h of incubation, samples were withdrawn from the each falcon tube to determine GABA content.
Statistical analysis
To analyze the results related to the potential of GABA production by examined bacteria, Duncan’s one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied using the SPSS software (ver. 16), while to optimize the conditions of GABA production, RSM with Design Expert 10.0.7.0 software was used.
Results
Screening of GAD activity
Total number of LAB isolates and the results of their previous identification31,33,34,35 are presented in Table 1. These isolates include members of lactobacilli (of the genera Lactobacillus, Lactiplantibacillus, and Levilactobacillus) (27 isolates), Lactococcus (20 isolates), and Streptococcus (3 isolates).
The GAD activity of the 50 isolates from Iranian traditional dairy products are also summarized in Table 1. The cultures of the isolates Levilactobacillus (Lb.) brevis M2, M4 and M12; Streptococcus (St.) thermophilus 43, and Lac. lactis 261, 311, 454, and 491 developed a strong blue color, consistent with a high GAD activity. No color change was observed for the isolates M3, M6, M7, M8, M9, M13, M15, M17, and M19; thus these are considered not to have GAD activity. Other isolates with greenish-blue, green and greenish-yellow color were considered as having medium, low and very low GAD activity, respectively. Fourteen isolates, including all high and some with moderate GAD activity were selected for subsequent experiments. GAD assay results revealed that most of the GAD-positive isolates were isolated from cheese (Lighvan and Motal); whereas, only one isolate from a traditional yogurt exhibited high GAD activity.
Genetic analysis of isolates
Lactobacilli, Streptococcus and Lactococcus species were targeted by rep-PCR to evaluate the intramolecular diversity among the isolates, as well as to assess whether isolates with GAD activity belonging to the same species were replicates or independent strains. Further, typing of the strains could serve for selecting different strains for GABA production optimization. The different patterns of similarity were clustered using the SM coefficient by the UPGMA method. Given the reproducibility of the assay around 94 (Fig. 1), isolates sharing a percentage of similarity > 94% were considered to belong to the same strain. Figure 2 a, b, c and d are the profiles obtained from 3 isolates of Lb. brevis, 4 isolates of Lac. lactis, 3 isolates of St. thermophilus and 4 isolates of Lb. delbrueckii. Lb. brevis M2 and Lb. brevis M12 strains showed 100% similarity. Lac. lactis 311 and Lac. lactis 454 strains had 100% similarity. St. thermophilus 74 and St. thermophilus 43 also had 100% similarity. These strains can be multiple isolates. Lactobacillus (Lb.) delbrueckii 69 and Lb. delbrueckii 67 also showed very high homology. The relation between the intra-species diversity with GABA production in these species showed that GABA production was significantly different between isolates with high similarity and comparable between isolates with low similarity. Unlike other examined strains, there was no significant difference in GABA production in St. thermophilus isolates with high and low similarity.
Confirmation of GABA by thin layer chromatography
Isolates that showed no GAD activity by the colorimetric method were excluded from further analyses. Based on the results of GAD activity, we selected 14 isolates corresponding to the species St. thermophilus (three), Lb. delbrueckii (four), Lac. lactis (four), Lb. brevis (three) for further studies. The GABA production was confirmed by observing red spots on the TLC plates (Fig. 3). The spot mobility from the culture supernatant of the 14 isolates was consistent with GABA, as a retention factor (Rf) value (0.77 cm) of the sample matched with the GABA standard. Thus, all 14 selected isolates were considered as GABA producers.
GABA’s of strains show the same retention factor (Rf) value as the GABA standard (= 0.77 cm). The retention factor was defined as the ratio of the distance traveled by the center of a spot to the distance traveled by the solvent front.
Quantitative GABA production measurement
GABA production of selected strains was quantified using a GABase microtiter plate enzymatic determination. As shown in Table 1, GABA production varied widely ranging from 0.01 to 0.36 mg/L (equivalent to 0.12 and 3.52 mM). All Lb. brevis isolates from Motal cheese exhibited a high ability to produce GABA (> 1 mM), while the highest GABA concentration was produced by Lb. brevis M4. Our findings further revealed that all isolates belonging to Lac. lactis have a medium to high GABA producing ability, while all Lb. delbrueckii cultures presented a low level of this ability.
RSM design
Although Lac. lactis isolates produced less GABA than the Lb. brevis isolates, the former species is the most economically-important starter component in cheese43, which prompted us to select two different strain of this species, Lac. lactis 311 and Lac. lactis 491, for GABA production optimization by RSM methodology. The selected two Lac. lactis strains are different strains according to the rep-typing results.As stated in the corresponding section, a CCD (central composite design) was performed based on a single variable factor test at a time and considering three independent variables: MSG concentration (mM), Temperature (°C), and pH. The 20 different combination set ups based on CCD and the corresponding GABA concentration for both predicted and experimental values are listed in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.
The interaction effect of these factors on GABA production concentration by Lac. lactis 311 is described by the following equation:
where R is the concentration of GABA (mg/mL) and A, B and C are coded values of the independent variables, viz., MSG, temperature and pH, respectively.
Three-dimensional surface plots were generated to estimate the effect of the combinations of the independent variables on the GABA production using Design Expert software. The 3D plot in Fig. 4A shows the interaction effect of MSG and temperature, keeping pH at its central level 4.5. According to the 3D plot, predictably, the GABA concentration increased with increasing MSG concentration and the increase of temperature. Nevertheless, in the low MSG concentration, increasing GABA concentration was more sharply compared to a higher concentration. The maximum concentration (3.83 mM) was observed with MSG in concentration of 89 mg/mL and temperature of 35.4 °C.
Figure 4B presents the 3D plot showing the dependency of GABA concentration on MSG concentration and pH, keeping the third factor (temperature) at its central level of 31 °C. The graph predicted that the highest GABA concentration by relevant strain at 35.4 °C was observed with the mid pH (4.5) and MSG concentration (89 mg/ml). However, GABA concentration at lower pH remained approximately constant by increasing MSG concentration. The 3D curve showing the interaction effect of temperature and pH has shown in Fig. 4C. The low GABA concentration was observed with the lowest temperature and lowest pH. The maximum GABA concentration (3.83 mM) was observed with pH (4.5) and temperature (35.4 °C).
Equation 2 explains the interaction effect of the independent variables on GABA concentration by Lac. lactis with strain code 491:
Figure 5A showed that with increasing the concentration of monosodium glutamate and increasing the temperature, the amount of GABA formed increased. This trend is in agreement with the results reported elsewhere by other authors41,42.
An increase in the amount of GABA was observed with increasing MSG and pH to 89 mg/ml and 4.59, respectively, at a constant temperature (Fig. 5B). When the concentration of monosodium glutamate was kept constant, the GABA level increased sharply with increasing temperature, but increased pH led to the production of low amounts of GABA (Fig. 5C). The incubation temperature is another important factor that may affect GABA production. In addition to the stability and biological activity of the enzyme, temperature also affects the thermodynamic equilibrium of the reaction.
Selection of optimal treatment and validation of model
The results of GABA production by two examined strains showed the optimal conditions for GABA production by Lac. lactis 311 and Lac. lactis 491 had a temperature of 35.4 and 30 °C, a pH of 4.5, 4.6 and a concentration of 89 and 147.4 mM of MSG, respectively. In the above conditions, the amount of GABA production by these two strains was 3.83 and 1.73 mM, respectively. Examination of the results in Fig. 6 shows that the points with a good approximation are on the straight line and the values obtained experimentally are in a good agreement with the values predicted by the model and showed the accuracy of the equation model.
Discussion
Regarding the Motal cheese isolates in this study, the results are consistent with previously reported levels by Ebadi Nezhad et al. (2020)44. GABA production begins in the exponential growth phase and increases near to the stationary phase due to an increased in GAD activity, which agrees with GAD being an intracellular enzyme produced in response to acidic conditions45. The nutrient sources required for the GABA production by bacteria include the primary sources of carbon, nitrogen (including GABA substrate, glutamic acid) and minerals46.
To avoid the use of replicates from the optimization studies, a strain-level typing scheme by rep-PCR was employed. Knowing intra-species diversity also helps to know how diverse the extend of GABA production is in closely-related and unrelated strains of the same species10. As for many other phenotypic traits, large phenotypic variations have occasionally been reported for genetically closely-related LAB strains47. Typing of LAB isolates from Koozeh and Lighvan cheese by rep-PCR with BOXA2R primer and typing of GABA-producing LAB isolates with rep-PCR by (GTG)5 primer has been previously reported by others10,31. As in this work, high intraspecies diversity was reported in the referred studies.
Presumptive detection of GABA production by LAB species by TLC, followed by its confirmative identification and quantification by High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has been previously reported to be a successful strategy by Zhang et al.48. These authors reported that the mobility spot of the culture supernatant of BC114 strain was basically consistent GABA standard and could be preliminarily identified as GABA within a negligible margin of error. The measured sample from the fermentation broth (a complex matrix), may also result in incomplete agreement with pure GABA standards48. The strain under investigation, Lb. plantarum BC114, showed the highest GABA production as measured by HPLC, which reached a value of 1.52 ± 0.07 g/L48. Tanamool et al.49 also used the TLC method to screen GABA-producing lactic acid bacteria strains. These authors found that among 44 LAB, the isolates L10-11 clearly produced the highest GABA based on the TLC results49. In our results, 14 isolates among 50 LAB were considered as GABA producers. Valenzuela et al.25 showed the ability of Lb. brevis to produce GABA is consistent with other reported levels for Lb. brevis LMG6906 (0.29 g/L). Lb. brevis CECT8183 isolated from Spanish cheese by Diana et al.17 produced 0.1 g/L of GABA. Lb. brevis BJ20 produced 0.002 g/L in a fermented sea tangle solution, which is a popular traditional marine food in Korea based on brown seaweed50. Lb. brevis PM17 was among the most potent studied isolates by Franciosi et al.9. By contrast, no significant GABA production was detected for any St. thermophilus strain isolated from yogurt products, compared to lactobacilli and Lactococcus species in study. According to the literature, large numbers of strains from these genera from various fermented foods are indicated as GABA-producing LAB13. There are many publications reporting variable GABA production levels by different LAB species. Among other factors, production could be affected by the GABA detection methods. For instance, Lb. delbrueckii PR1 (63 mg/kg) and Lac. lactis PU1 showed the highest GABA concentrations9. The results of Ly et al.10 showed Lb. futsaii, Lb. namurensis and Lb. plantarum to produce high amounts of GABA in the range of 1.7–2 g/L. Hwang et al.51 have examined GABA production by two Lac. lactis strains in MRS containing 5% MSG at 30 °C. Maximum GABA production was observed after 40 h (1.37 g/L). Redruello et al.52 studied the effect of 6 Lac. lactis GABA-producing strains in cheese making. GABA accumulated at concentrations up to 0.457 g/Kg in cheese. Galli et al.53 revealed GABA content of their fermented milks by two mix starters (Lac. lactis and Lb. rhamnonus or Lb. paracasei) 0.185 and 0.319 g/L, respectively by adding 249 mg/L MSG. Santos-Espinosa et al.54 demonstrated the highest GABA concentration (0.086 g/L) in fermented milk with Lac. lactis L-571 at 37 °C with 3 g/L of glutamate substrate. In a study conducted by Tajabadi et al.55 the optimum conditions for maximum GABA production by Lb. plantarum Taj-Apis362 were an initial glutamic acid concentration of 497.97 mM, culture temperature of 36 °C, initial pH of 5.31 and incubation time of 60 h, which produced 0.74 g/L of GABA.
GABA-producing ability is linked to the activity of GAD enzyme in LAB56. The source of LAB might affect GAD activity and GABA production capacity, as it was speculated that acidified foods could probably be the natural niche of GABA producers10. Li et al.57 identified and characterized the GABA-producing lactic acid bacteria and claimed that most LAB strains are able to produce the highest amount of GABA in the range of pH 4 to 5 at 30 to 50 °C and in the presence of glutamic acid. For this reason, this temperature and pH range was used in their study57. GABA production occurs under acidic conditions. LAB metabolism mainly leads to the production of organic acids such as lactic and acetic acid. This means that they have to frequently face acidic stress and therefore, they have developed different mechanisms to cope with acidic conditions such as the GAD pathway. Laroute et al.58 claimed the activation of this pathway occurred after changing the pH to 4.6 and during the stationary phase. Their results are consistent with our results which optimum pH for GABA production in two examined isolates is 4.5 and 4.6. As reported by Laroute et al.58 a dose of 152 mM glutamate, increased the production of GABA by Lac. lactis NCDO 2118. This dosage of glutamate is similarly optimum dose for GABA production in our examined isolate (Lac. lactis 491). The findings of our work showed Lac. lactis 311 produced more GABA in lower concentration than Lac. lactis 491. The probable reason that lower concentrations of MSG can increase the efficiency of GABA production in comparison to higher concentrations of it, is that large amounts of MSG increase the osmotic pressure of cells and disrupt bacterial metabolism, leading to a decrease in GABA efficiency by bacteria 59. Although the optimal concentrations of MSG are different for various microorganisms in GABA production, some researchers have proven that excessive MSG could inhibit cell growth and minimize GABA production60,61. Lu et al.62 showed that the highest concentration of GABA production by Lac. lactis isolated from kimchi was at 34° C (3.68 g/L). These results are similar to our results about Lac. lactis 311. However, they stated that the optimal pH of GABA production was in the range of 7–862, which was not in compliance with the results obtained in our study.
Conclusions
In the present study, firstly, LAB isolates were screened for GABA production according to a qualitative method based on a colorimetric assay. Significant variability in GABA production was encountered among the different species and strains tested. GABA-producing strains were then subjected to a TLC analysis to detect strains with high GABA producing ability. Response surface methodology was finally used to optimize conditions for maximum GABA production in two Lac. lactis strains, taking into account the variables affecting the response. The selected strains and the culture conditions producing the highest amounts of this bioactive compound could be used to develop GABA-enriched functional foods or in other biotechnological applications.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- LAB:
-
Lactic acid bacteria
- GRAS:
-
Generally recognized as safe
- GABA:
-
Gamma-aminobutyric acid
- GAD:
-
Glutamate decarboxylase
- NADP:
-
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
- MSG:
-
Monosodium glutamate
- TLC:
-
Thin layer chromatography
- rep-PCR:
-
Repetitive extra genic profiling PCR
- RSM:
-
Response surface methodology
- CCD:
-
Central composite design
- Rf:
-
Retention factor
References
FDA. GRAS Exemption Claim for gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) for Use as a Food Ingredient in the United States (U.S.). . (FDA), Food and Drug Administration Co, Pharma Food International; 2015.
Fleming HP, McFeeters RF, Daeschel MA. The lactobacilli, pediococci, and leuconostocs: vegetable products. In, Bacterial Starter Cultures for Foods: 97–118 (CRC Press, 2018).
Yogeswara, A. I., Kusumawati, I. G., Sumadewi, N. L., Rahayu, E. S. & Indrati, R. Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria from Indonesian fermented foods as γ-aminobutyric acid-producing bacteria. Int. Food Res. J. 25(4), 1753–1757 (2018).
Vinderola, G., Ouwehand, A., Salminen, S., & von Wright, A. (Eds.). Lactic acid bacteria: microbiological and functional aspects. CRC Press (2019).
Abushelaibi, A., Al-Mahadin, S., El-Tarabily, K., Shah, N. P. & Ayyash, M. Characterization of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from camel milk. LWT - Food Sci. Technol 79, 316–325 (2017).
Silva, M. S. et al. Probiotic properties of Weissella cibaria and Leuconostoc citreum isolated from tejuino–A typical Mexican beverage. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 86, 227–232 (2017).
Nejati, F. et al. Manufacture of a functional fermented milk enriched of Angiotensin-I Converting Enzyme (ACE)-inhibitory peptides and γ-amino butyric acid (GABA). LWT - Food Sci. Technol 51(1), 183–189 (2013).
Shi, Y. et al. Antioxidative and probiotic activities of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional artisanal milk cheese from Northeast China. Probiotics Antimicrob 11(4), 1086–1099 (2019).
Franciosi, E., Carafa, I., Nardin, T., Schiavon, S., Poznanski, E., Cavazza, A., Larcher, R. & Tuohy, K.M. Biodiversity and γ-aminobutyric acid production by lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional alpine raw cow’s milk cheeses. Biomed Res. Int.1–13( 2015).
Ly, D., Mayrhofer, S., Agung Yogeswara, I., Nguyen, T.-H. & Domig, K. J. Identification, classification and screening for γ-amino-butyric acid production in lactic acid bacteria from cambodian fermented foods. Biomolecules 9(12), 768 (2019).
Cui, Y., Miao, K., Niyaphorn, S. & Qu, X. Production of gamma-aminobutyric acid from lactic acid bacteria: A systematic review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21(3), 995 (2020).
Shan, Y. et al. Evaluation of improved γ-aminobutyric acid production in yogurt using Lactobacillus plantarum NDC75017. Int. J. Dairy Sci. 98(4), 2138–2149 (2015).
Sarasa, S. B. et al. A brief review on the non-protein amino acid, gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA): Its production and role in microbes. Curr. Microbiol. 77(4), 534–544 (2020).
Yogeswara, I. B. A., Maneerat, S. & Haltrich, D. Glutamate decarboxylase from lactic acid bacteria—A key enzyme in GABA synthesis. Microorganisms 8(12), 1923 (2020).
Mazzoli, R., Riedel, K. & Pessione, E. Bioactive compounds from microbes. Front. Microbiol. 8:392 (2017).
Strandwitz, P. Neurotransmitter modulation by the gut microbiota. Brain Res. 1693, 128–133 (2018).
Diana, M., Quílez, J. & Rafecas, M. Gamma-aminobutyric acid as a bioactive compound in foods: A review. J. Funct. Foods. 10, 407–420 (2014).
Shrestha, A., Grimm, M., Ojiro, I., Krumwiede, J. & Schikora, A. Impact of quorum sensing molecules on plant growth and immune system. Front. Microbiol. 11, 1545 (2020).
Tujioka, K. et al. Dietary ornithine affects the tissue protein synthesis rate in young rats. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 58(4), 297–302 (2012).
Xu, N., Wei, L. & Liu, J. Biotechnological advances and perspectives of gamma-aminobutyric acid production. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 33(3), 64 (2017).
Komatsuzaki, N., Shima, J., Kawamoto, S., Momose, H. & Kimura, T. Production of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) by Lactobacillus paracasei isolated from traditional fermented foods. Food Microbiol. 22(6), 497–504 (2005).
Pavli, F., Gkana, E., Adebambo, O., Karatzas, K.-A., Panagou, E., Nychas, G.-J.E. Ιn: Vitro Screening of γ-Aminobutyric Acid and Autoinducer-2 Signalling in Lactic Acid Bacteria Exhibiting Probiotic Potential Isolated from Natural Black Conservolea Olives. Foods 8(12):640 (2019).
Ribeiro, S.C., Domingos‐Lopes, M.F., Stanton, C., Ross, R.P., Silva, C.C. Production of‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) by Lactobacillus otakiensis and other Lactobacillus sp. isolated from traditional Pico cheese. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 71(4):1012–7 (2018).
Kook, M.-C. & Cho, S.-C. Production of GABA (gamma amino butyric acid) by lactic acid bacteria. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 33(3), 377–389 (2013).
Valenzuela, J. A., Flórez, A. B., Vázquez, L., Vasek, O. M. & Mayo, B. Production of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) by lactic acid bacteria strains isolated from traditional, starter-free dairy products made of raw milk. Benef. Microbes 10(5), 579–587 (2019).
Komatsuzaki, N., Nakamura, T., Kimura, T. & Shima, J. Characterization of glutamate decarboxylase from a high γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-producer. Lactobacillus Paracasei. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 72(2), 278–285 (2008).
Lee, N.-K. & Paik, H.-D. Bioconversion using lactic acid bacteria: ginsenosides, GABA, and phenolic compounds. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 27(5), 869–877 (2017).
Park, J. Y., Jeong, S.-J. & Kim, J. H. Characterization of a glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) gene from Lactobacillus zymae. Biotechnol. Lett. 36(9), 1791–1799 (2014).
Ramakrishna, A., Roshchina, V.V. Neurotransmitters in plants: perspectives and applications: (CRC Press; 2018).
Attar, M. A., Yavarmanesh, M., Mortazavi, A., Dovom, M. R. E. & Najafi, M. B. H. Antibacterial effects of Lactococcus lactis isolated from Lighvan cheese regarding the recognition of Nisin, Lacticin and Lactococcin structural genes. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 89, 186–191 (2018).
Edalatian, M.R., Najafi, M.B.H., Mortazavi, S.A., Alegría, Á., Nassiri, M.R., Bassami, M.R., et al. Microbial diversity of the traditional Iranian cheeses Lighvan and Koozeh, as revealed by polyphasic culturing and culture-independent approaches. Dairy science technology 92(1):75–90 (2012).
Joghataei, M., Yavarmanesh, M. & Dovom, M. R. E. Safety evaluation and antibacterial activity of enterococci isolated from Lighvan cheese. J. Food Saf. 37(1), e12289 (2017).
Azizi, F., Najafi, M.B.H., Dovom, M.R.E. The biodiversity of Lactobacillus spp. from Iranian raw milk Motal cheese and antibacterial evaluation based on bacteriocin-encoding genes. AMB Express 7(1):1–10 (2017).
Edalatian, M. R., Habibi Najafi, M. B., Mortazavi, A. & Mayo, B. The biodiversity and evolution of lactic flora during ripening of the Iranian semisoft Lighvan cheese. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 65(1), 81–89 (2012).
Farimani, R. H. et al. Identification, typing and functional characterization of dominant lactic acid bacteria strains from Iranian traditional yoghurt. Eur. Food Res. Technol 242(4), 517–526 (2016).
Lacroix, N., St-Gelais, D., Champagne, C. & Vuillemard, J. Gamma-aminobutyric acid-producing abilities of lactococcal strains isolated from old-style cheese starters. Dairy Sci. Technol. 93(3), 315–327 (2013).
Lee, B.-J. et al. Antioxidant activity and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) content in sea tangle fermented by Lactobacillus brevis BJ20 isolated from traditional fermented foods. Food Chem. 122(1), 271–276 (2010).
Koeuth, T., Versalovic, J. & Lupski, J. R. Differential subsequence conservation of interspersed repetitive Streptococcus pneumoniae BOX elements in diverse bacteria. Genome Res. 5(4), 408–418 (1995).
Tsukatani, T., Higuchi, T. & Matsumoto, K. Enzyme-based microtiter plate assay for γ-aminobutyric acid: application to the screening of γ-aminobutyric acid-producing lactic acid bacteria. Anal. Chim. Acta. 540(2), 293–297 (2005).
Rayavarapu, B., Tallapragada, P. & Usha, M. Statistical optimization of γ-aminobutyric acid production by response surface methodology and artificial neural network models using Lactobacillus fermentum isolated from palm wine. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 22, 101362 (2019).
Jung, W.Y., Kim, S.G., Kim, H.K., Lee, J.S., Han, S.I. & Choe, S., et al. Effect of GABA extract of black sticky rice with giant embryo on alcohol‐related indices after acute alcohol intake in social drinkers. Alcoholism: Clin. Exp. Res. 39(7):1212–8 (2015).
Lee, H.-L. et al. Diversity of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in makgeolli and their production of γ-aminobutyric acid. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 47(2), 204–210 (2015).
McAuliffe, O. Symposium review: Lactococcus lactis from nondairy sources: Their genetic and metabolic diversity and potential applications in cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 101(4), 3597–3610 (2018).
Ebadi Nezhad, S.J., Dovom, M.R.E., Najafi, M.B.H., Yavarmanesh, M. & Mayo, B. Technological characteristics of Lactobacillus spp. isolated from Iranian raw milk Motal cheese. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 133:110070 (2020).
Lu, X., Xie, C. & Gu, Z. Optimisation of fermentative parameters for GABA enrichment by Lactococcus lactis. Czech J. Food Sci. 27(6), 433–442 (2009).
Tamura, T. et al. Establishment of an efficient fermentation system of gamma-aminobutyric acid by a lactic acid bacterium, Enterococcus avium G-15, isolated from carrot leaves. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 33(10), 1673–1679 (2010).
Buhnik-Rosenblau, K. et al. Biodiversity of Enterococcus faecalis based on genomic typing. Int. J. Food Microbiol 165, 27–34 (2013).
Zhang, Q., Zeng, L., Tan, X., Tang, J. & Xiang, W. An efficient γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) producing and nitrite reducing ability of lactobacillus plantarum BC114 isolated from Chinese paocai. Food Sci. Technol. Res 23(5), 749–755 (2017).
Tanamool, V., Hongsachart, P. & Soemphol, W. Screening and characterisation of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) producing lactic acid bacteria isolated from Thai fermented fish (Plaa-som) in Nong Khai and its application in Thai fermented vegetables (Som-pak). Food Sci. Technol. 40, 483–490 (2019).
Kim, D.-H. et al. Optimization of gamma-aminobutyric acid production using sea tangle extract by lactic acid bacterial fermentation. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 90, 636–642 (2018).
Hwang, E. & Park, J.-Y. Isolation and characterization of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-producing lactic acid bacteria from kimchi. Curr. Top. Lact. Acid Bact. Probiotics. 6(2), 64–69 (2020).
Redruello, B. et al. GABA-producing Lactococcus lactis strains isolated from camel’s milk as starters for the production of GABA-enriched cheese. Foods. 10(3), 633 (2021).
Galli, V., Venturi, M., Mari, E., Guerrini, S. & Granchi, L. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) production in fermented milk by lactic acid bacteria isolated from spontaneous raw milk fermentation. Int. Dairy J. 127:105284 (2022).
Santos-Espinosa, A. et al. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) production in milk fermented by specific wild lactic acid bacteria strains isolated from artisanal Mexican cheeses. Ann. Microbiol. 70(1), 1–11 (2020).
Tajabadi, N. et al. Optimization of γ-Aminobutyric Acid Production by Lactobacillus plantarum Taj-Apis362from Honeybees. Molecules 20(4), 6654–6669 (2015).
Ohmori, T., Tahara, M. & Ohshima, T. Mechanism of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) production by a lactic acid bacterium in yogurt-sake. Process. Biochem. 74, 21–27 (2018).
Li, H., Qiu, T., Gao, D. & Cao, Y. Medium optimization for production of gamma-aminobutyric acid by Lactobacillus brevis NCL912. Amino acids 38(5):1439–45 (2010).
Laroute, V., Mazzoli, R., Loubière, P., Pessione, E. & Cocaign-Bousquet, M. Environmental conditions affecting GABA production in Lactococcus lactis NCDO 2118. Microorganisms. 9(1):122 (2021).
Villegas, J. M., Brown, L., de Giori, G. S. & Hebert, E. M. Optimization of batch culture conditions for GABA production by Lactobacillus brevis CRL 1942, isolated from quinoa sourdough. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 67, 22–26 (2016).
Zhuang, K., Jiang, Y., Feng, X., Li, L., Dang, F. & Zhang, W., et al. Transcriptomic response to GABA-producing Lactobacillus plantarum CGMCC 1.2437 T induced by L-MSG. PloS one 13(6):e0199021 (2018).
Cui, Y., Miao, K., Niyaphorn, S. & Qu, X. Production of gamma-aminobutyric acid from lactic acid bacteria: A systematic review. Int J Mol Sci 21(3):995 (2020).
Lu, X., Chen, Z., Gu, Z. & Han, Y. Isolation of γ-aminobutyric acid-producing bacteria and optimization of fermentative medium. Biochem. Eng. J. 41(1), 48–52 (2008).
Acknowledgements
The research of the corresponding author is supported by a grant from Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (N.2/45302).
Funding
This work was supported by [Ferdowsi University of Mashhad] (Grant Numbers [2/45302]).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.R.E.D.: Supervision, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. M.B.H.N.: Supervision, Writing—review & editing. N.N.: Investigation, Writing—original draft. P.R.V.: Investigation, Writing—review & editing. S.J.E.N.: Investigation, Writing—review & editing, B.M.: review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Edalatian Dovom, M.R., Habibi Najafi, M.B., Rahnama Vosough, P. et al. Screening of lactic acid bacteria strains isolated from Iranian traditional dairy products for GABA production and optimization by response surface methodology. Sci Rep 13, 440 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27658-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27658-5
- Springer Nature Limited