Abstract
In this work, a Josephson relation is generalized to a multi-component fermion superfluid. Superfluid density is expressed through a two-particle Green function for pairing states. When the system has only one gapless collective excitation mode, the Josephson relation is simplified, which is given in terms of the superfluid order parameters and the trace of two-particle normal Green function. In addition, it is found that the matrix elements of two-particle Green function is directly related to the matrix elements of the pairing fluctuations of superfluid order parameters. Furthermore, in the presence of inversion symmetry, the superfluid density is given in terms of the pairing fluctuation matrix. The results of the superfluid density in Haldane model show that the generalized Josephson relation can be also applied to a multi-band fermion superfluid in lattice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The superfluid density \(\rho _s\) and order parameter \(n_0\) in superfluid liquid Helium-4 are two closely related1,2, but different concepts3,4. However, they can connect with each other through a Josephson relation5,6,7, i.e.,
where \(\rho _s\) is superfluid density (particle number per unit volume), \(n_0\) is order parameter (condensate density) in liquid Helium-4. \(G(\mathbf{q} ,0)\) is normal single-particle Green function at zero frequency, m is atomic mass of Helium-4. The above equation indicates that the Green function diverges as wave vector \(q\rightarrow 0\). Such a divergence of \(1/q^2\) in Green function is quite a universal phenomenon which can occur in many systems, e.g., superfluid Helium-4, superconductor and ferromagnet8. The above Josephson relation in superfluid system can be viewed as a manifestation of Bogoliubov’s “\(1/q^2\)” theorem in spontaneously symmetry breaking system7. It also has close connections with the absence of long ranged order (e.g., condensation) at finite temperature in one and two dimensions9,10.
Its possible generalization in two-component fermion superfluid has been firstly investigated by Taylor11. Using auxiliary-field approach, Dawson et al. also derived a Josephson relation
which holds for both bosonic and fermion superfluids12. Here \(\Delta\) is superfluid order parameter (pairing gap in superconductor) and \(G_{II}(\mathbf{q} ,\omega )\) is two-particle Green function for pairing states in conventional two-component fermion superfluid. It is found that the superfluid density is determined by superfluid order parameter and the behaviors of two-particle Green function at long wave length limit. In comparison with bosonic superfluid, the above formula shows that the two-particle Green function replace the corresponding single-particle Green function of bosonic superfluid. In addition, pairing gap \(\Delta\) plays the roles of order parameter in fermion superfluid.
The superfluid properties in multi-component (or multi-band) fermion system have attracted a great interests13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21. The exotic pairing mechanism in Fermi gas with SU(N) invariant interaction has been proposed22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29, dependent on interaction and chemical potential, which can show coexistence of superfluidity and magnetism30. Another interesting example of multi-band fermion system is twisted bilayer graphene31,32. It is shown that, there exists superconductivity33 in this system. Its superfluid weight (which is superfluid density up to a constant) have been investigated intensively34,35,36,37,38. Inspired by above studies, in this paper we investigate the superfluid density for multi-component fermion superfluid. A generalized formula of Josephson relation for multi-component bosons has been given in Ref.39. A natural question arises: does there exist a similar relation for a multi-component fermion superfluid or superconductor?
In this paper, we give a generalized Josephson relation for a multi-component fermion superfluid system. It is found that we can take a similar method as done in bosonic system to get the general results for fermions. To be specific, the superfluid density can be expressed in terms of two-particle Green functions. Furthermore, when there is only one gapless collective mode, the superfluid density is determined by the superfluid order parameter and the trace of two-particle Green function. In addition, in the presence of spatial inversion symmetry, the two-particle Green function is directly related to fluctuation matrix of order parameters. Furthermore, it is found that the generalized Josephson relation can be also applied to a multi-band lattice system.
Results
Josephson relation in conventional two component fermion superfluid
First of all, we consider two (spin) component fermion superfluid system with short-ranged attractive interactions. The Hamiltonian is
where m is particle mass, \(\mu\) is chemical potential, V is volume of system and g is interaction strength parameter between two different (spin) components. In the rest of paper, we set \(\hbar =V=1\) for simplifications.
Similarly as bosonic superfluid39, here we outline how to get the above relation Eq. (2) in the two-component fermion system. First of all, it is well known that the superfluid order parameter (or pairing gap in superconductor) in two-component fermions is
where \({\hat{\Delta }}(\mathbf{r} )=g\psi _{\downarrow }(\mathbf{r} )\psi _{\uparrow }(\mathbf{r} )\) is operator of order parameter.
In addition, when the superfluid order parameter \(\Delta\) undergoes a small phase twist \(e^{2i \delta \theta (\mathbf{r} )}\)11,40, the variation (fluctuation) of superfluid order parameter is
where \(\delta \theta (\mathbf{r} )\) is a real function which denotes the small phase twist.
On the other hand, a phase gradient of superfluid order parameter would induce a superfluid current (superflow)41, namely
where we define superfluid velocity as the gradient of phase, i.e.,\(\mathbf{v} _s\equiv \mathbf {\nabla } \delta \theta (\mathbf{r} )/m\) and superfluid density \(\rho _s\) as the coefficient before \(\mathbf{v} _s\) in the current \(\delta \mathbf{j} (\mathbf{r} )\). We will see the connection between the above two equations (Eqs. (6), (5)) would result in the Josephson relation.
In order to get the relationship between superfluid density \(\rho _s\) and order parameter \(\Delta\), similarly as bosonic case9,39,42, here we need a perturbation which include operator of order parameter \({\hat{\Delta }}(\mathbf{r} )=g\psi _{\downarrow }(\mathbf{r} )\psi _{\uparrow }(\mathbf{r} )\) and its adjoint \({\hat{\Delta }}^{\dag }(\mathbf{r} )=g\psi ^{\dag }_{\uparrow }(\mathbf{r} )\psi ^{\dag }_{\downarrow }(\mathbf{r} )\), i.e.,
where \(\xi\) is a small complex number, \({\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q }=\sum _{k}g\psi _{\downarrow \mathbf{q}+k }\psi _{\uparrow \mathbf -k }\) is fluctuation operator of order parameter in momentum space and we use relation \(\psi _\sigma (\mathbf{r} )=\sum _\mathbf{k} \psi _{\sigma \mathbf{k} }e^{i\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r} }\). Here we add an infinitesimal positive number \(\epsilon \rightarrow 0_+\) in the above exponential which corresponds to choose a boundary condition that the perturbation is very slowly added to the system43.
We assume initially the system is in the ground state \(|0\rangle\), and then slowly turn on perturbation \(H'\), the wave function can be written as
where \(a_n(t\rightarrow -\infty )=\delta _{n,0}\) and \(H|n\rangle =E_n|n\rangle\), H is unperturbed Hamiltonian. \(|n\rangle\) and \(E_n\) are eigenstate and eigenenergy respectively. Using perturbation theory, we get
where \(\omega _{n0}=E_n-E_0\). The changes of order parameter \(\langle \psi _{\downarrow }\psi _{\uparrow }(\mathbf{r} )\rangle\) and current \(\mathbf{j} (\mathbf{r} )\) are respectively
In the following, we assume the system has translational invariance and total momentum is a good quantum number. So state \(|n\rangle\) is also eigenstate of total momentum \(\mathbf{P} =\sum _{\sigma \mathbf{k} } \mathbf{k} \psi _{\sigma \mathbf{k} }^{\dag }\psi _{\sigma \mathbf{k} }\), e.g., \(\mathbf{P} |n\rangle =\mathbf{q} _n|n\rangle\) with eigenvalue \(\mathbf{q} _n\). On other hand, from commutation relations
we see \({\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q }^{\dag }|n\rangle\) and \({\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q }|n\rangle\) are also eigenstates of \(\mathbf{P}\), with momenta \(\mathbf{q} _n+\mathbf{q}\) and \(\mathbf{q} _n-\mathbf{q}\), respectively. Using relations \({\hat{\Delta }}(\mathbf{r} )=\sum _\mathbf{q} {\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q} e^{i\mathbf{q} \cdot \mathbf{r} }\), \(\langle 0|{\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q '}|n\rangle \langle n|{\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q }^{\dag }|0\rangle =\delta _\mathbf{q ,\mathbf{q} '}|\langle 0|{\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q} |n\rangle |^2\), \(\langle 0|{\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q }^{\dag }|n\rangle \langle n|{\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q '}|0\rangle =\delta _\mathbf{q ,\mathbf{q} '}|\langle 0|{\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q }^{\dag }|n\rangle |^2\), \(\langle 0|{\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q }|n\rangle \langle n|{\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q '}|0\rangle =\delta _\mathbf{q ,-\mathbf{q} '}\langle 0|{\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q }|n\rangle \langle n|{\hat{\Delta }}_{-\mathbf{q} }|0\rangle\) and \(\langle 0|{\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q '}|n\rangle \langle n|{\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q }|0\rangle =\delta _\mathbf{q ,-\mathbf{q} '}\langle 0|{\hat{\Delta }}_{-\mathbf{q} }|n\rangle \langle n|{\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q }|0\rangle\), the change of order parameter can be written as
where
is two-particle normal (anomalous) Green function for pairing states44,45.
Taking zero-frequency (\(\omega \pm i \epsilon =0\)) limit,
For two-component neutral fermions, the order parameter \(\Delta (\mathbf{r} )=g\langle \psi _{\downarrow }(\mathbf{r} )\psi _{\uparrow }(\mathbf{r} )\rangle =\Delta\) can be taken as a real number, and the low energy collective excitation is Anderson–Bogoliubov phonon. Similarly as bosonic case39, it can be shown that \(F_{II}(\mathbf{q} ,0)=-G_{II}(\mathbf{q} ,0)\) as \(q\rightarrow 0\) (see “Discussions” section), so finally
where we set \(\xi \equiv \alpha e^{i\phi }\) with amplitude \(\alpha\) and phase \(\phi\).
Similarly using commutation relation
where indices \(i,j=x,y,z\), current fluctuation operator \(\mathbf{j} _\mathbf{q }=\sum _{\sigma \mathbf{k} } [(\mathbf{k} +\mathbf{q} /2)]/m\psi ^{\dag }_{\sigma \mathbf{k} }\psi _{\sigma \mathbf{k} +\mathbf{q} }\), and the translational invariance, we conclude \(\mathbf{j} _\mathbf{q }|n\rangle\) is also eigenstate of \(\mathbf{P}\), with momentum \(\mathbf{q} _n-\mathbf{q}\). Using the fact of \(\mathbf{j} (\mathbf{r} )=\sum _\mathbf{q} \mathbf{j} _\mathbf{q} e^{i\mathbf{q} \cdot \mathbf{r} }\), \(\langle 0|\mathbf{j} _\mathbf{q '}|n\rangle \langle n|{\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q }^{\dag }|0\rangle =\delta _\mathbf{q ,\mathbf{q} '}\langle 0|\mathbf{j} _\mathbf{q} |n\rangle \langle n|{\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q }^{\dag }|0\rangle\) and \(\langle 0|{\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q }^{\dag }|n\rangle \langle n|\mathbf{j} _\mathbf{q '}|0\rangle =\delta _\mathbf{q ,\mathbf{q} '}\langle 0|{\hat{\Delta }}_\mathbf{q }^{\dag }|n\rangle \langle n|\mathbf{j} _\mathbf{q }|0\rangle\), the current is
where h.c. denotes Hermitian (complex) conjugate and
When \(\omega \pm i\epsilon =0\),
Using continuity equation \(\frac{\partial \rho (\mathbf{r} ,t)}{\partial t}+\mathbf {\nabla }\cdot \mathbf{j} (\mathbf{r} ,t)=0\), \(\omega _{n0}(\rho _\mathbf{q} )_{0n}=\mathbf{q} \cdot (\mathbf{j} _\mathbf{q })_{0n}\) and \(\omega _{n0}(\rho _\mathbf{q} )_{n0}=-\mathbf{q} \cdot (\mathbf{j} _\mathbf{q })_{n0}\), we can obtain
where density fluctuation operator \(\rho _\mathbf{q} =\sum _{\sigma \mathbf{k} } \psi ^{\dag }_{\sigma \mathbf{k} }\psi _{\sigma \mathbf{k} +\mathbf{q} }\) and we use the fact that \(\langle {\hat{\Delta }}^{\dag }_\mathbf{q =0}\rangle =\Delta ^*=\Delta\). So
For isotropic system, further assuming \(\mathbf{q} \parallel \mathbf{B} \propto \delta \mathbf{j}\) and using Eq. (14), so we get
Here we further use Eq. (5), and then get
Using Eq. (6), i.e., \(\delta \mathbf{j} (\mathbf{r} )\equiv \rho _s \mathbf{v} _s\), the Josephson relation for conventional two-component Fermions is obtained
which is consistent with the Taylor’s11 and Dawson et al.’s12 results.
General Josephson relation for multi-component fermions
For a multi-component (or multi-band) fermion superfluid, the order parameter \(\Delta _{\alpha \beta }\) can be written as
where the operator of order parameter \({\hat{\Delta }}_{\alpha \beta }(\mathbf{r} )=g_{\alpha \beta }\psi _{\alpha }(\mathbf{r} )\psi _{\beta }(\mathbf{r} )\), \(\psi _{\alpha (\beta )}\) is the field operator for \(\alpha (\beta )\)-th component, and \(g_{\alpha \beta }\) is interaction parameter between \(\alpha\)-th and \(\beta\)-th components. The above equation indicates that the number of superfluid order parameter may be an arbitrary integer \(m\ge 1\) (\(m\in Z\)) in a multi-component fermion superfluid. In such a case, we need a general perturbation Hamiltonian
where we relabel the operator of order parameter with \({\hat{\Delta }}_{i}(i=1,2,...,m)\) and introduce column vectors \({\hat{\Delta }}(\mathbf{r} )=\{{\hat{\Delta }}_1(\mathbf{r} ),{\hat{\Delta }}_2(\mathbf{r} ),...,{\hat{\Delta }}_m(\mathbf{r} ) \}^\mathbf{t}\), \(\xi =\{ \xi _1,\xi _2,...,\xi _m \}^\mathbf{t}\) and \(\{...\}^t\) denotes matrix transpose and dot \(\cdot\) is the multiplication of matrices.
In the above subsection, the definition of superfluid velocity involves particle mass m. However, the superfluid system we considered here can be a general many-body system with complex energy spectra. For an arbitrarily general multi-component (or multi-band) system, it may be difficult to introduce notion of mass. Furthermore, the superfluid velocity may be unable to be defined unambiguously. In the following manuscript, the superfluid density is simply defined as the coefficient before the gradient of phase in current, i.e.,
For a general multi-component superfluid system, the phase variation of order parameter \(\delta \theta\) is well-defined. Consequently, the physical meaning of superfluid density \(\rho _s\) is also clear. In fact, the above definition of superfluid density is also consistent with the phase twist method in lattice system46.
Similarly using perturbation theory and translational invariance, we can get the change of order parameter
where
are two-particle normal (anomalous) Green function matrix elements and index \(i (j)=1,2,...,m\). \(|n\rangle\) is also eigenstate of (canonical) momentum \(\mathbf{P} =\sum _{k,\sigma }{} \mathbf{k} \psi ^{\dag }_{\sigma k}\psi _{\sigma k}\), i.e., \(\mathbf{P} |n=\mathbf{q} _n|n\rangle\).
In a general multi-component fermion superfluid, the current fluctuation operator can be written as \(\mathbf{j} _\mathbf{q }=\sum _{\alpha \beta \mathbf{k} } T_{\alpha \beta }(\mathbf{k} ,\mathbf{q} )\psi ^{\dag }_{\alpha \mathbf{k} }\psi _{\beta \mathbf{k} +\mathbf{q} }\), where \(T_{\alpha \beta }(\mathbf{k} ,\mathbf{q} )\) is a function of \(\mathbf{k}\) and \(\mathbf{q}\). Its specific form is determined by the kinetic energy part of Hamiltonian. For usual parabola dispersion energy, e.g., as shown in Eq. (3), \(T_{\alpha \beta }(\mathbf{k} ,\mathbf{q} )=\delta _{\alpha \beta }[\mathbf{k} +\mathbf{q} /2]/m\). Similarly as above section, one gets current
and here we introduce a \(m\times 1\) column vector B and its j-th component
When \(\omega \pm i\epsilon = 0\),
Similarly using continuity equation \(\frac{\partial \rho (\mathbf{r} ,t)}{\partial t}+\mathbf {\nabla }\cdot \mathbf{j} (\mathbf{r} ,t)=0\), \(\omega _{n0}(\rho _\mathbf{q} )_{0n}=\mathbf{q} \cdot (\mathbf{j} _\mathbf{q })_{0n}\), \(\omega _{n0}(\rho _\mathbf{q} )_{n0}=-\mathbf{q} \cdot (\mathbf{j} _\mathbf{q })_{n0}\), and assuming \(\mathbf{q} \parallel \mathbf{B} \propto \delta \mathbf{j}\) for isotropic system, we get
Here density fluctuation operator takes the same form as that in two-component case, i.e., \(\rho _\mathbf{q} =\sum _{\sigma \mathbf{k} } \psi ^{\dag }_{\sigma \mathbf{k} }\psi _{\sigma \mathbf{k} +\mathbf{q} }\).
Introducing \(x(\mathbf{r} )=e^{i\mathbf{q} \cdot \mathbf{r} }\{\xi _{1},\xi _{2},...,\xi _{m} \}^\mathbf{t}\), \(\delta \Delta (\mathbf{r} )=\{\delta \Delta _{1}(\mathbf{r} ), \delta \Delta _{2}(\mathbf{r} ),...,\delta \Delta _{m}(\mathbf{r} )\}^\mathbf{t}\), the above Eq. (31) can be written as
and
where \((I)_{m\times m}\) is a \(m\times m\) identity matrix and we define coefficient matrix
which is a \(2m\times 2m\) matrix and one should not confuse with normal Green function \(G_{II}(\mathbf{q} ,0)\), which is a \(m\times m\) matrix. If \(\mathbf{G} _\mathbf{II }\) has inverse (determinant \(Det|\mathbf{G} _\mathbf{II }|\ne 0\)), using \(\mathbf{q} x(\mathbf{r} )=-i \mathbf {\nabla } x\), \(\mathbf{q} x^*(\mathbf{r} )=i \mathbf {\nabla } x^*\) and Eqs. (33) and (34), we get
Using Eq. (26), i.e., \(\delta \mathbf{j} (\mathbf{r} )\equiv \rho _s \mathbf {\nabla } \delta \theta\), we get a general Josephson relation for fermion superfluid
The Eq. (37) gives a way to calculate the superfluid density in terms of two-particle Green functions, which is also the main result in this work. It should be emphasized that the above result Eq. (37) only relies on the definition of superfluid density Eq. (26), the existence of superfluid order parameter (\(\Delta \ne 0\)), translational invariance and continuity equation for particle number.
In addition, even though Eq. (37) is obtained in a translational invariant system (the momentum is a good quantum number), the above formula can be applied equally to lattice system as long as the superfluid state has lattice translation symmetry (see also “Summary” section). This is because, we know for lattice system, the engenstates can be classified by lattice momentum. In the above derivation, on the one hand, we need to identify the (canonical) momentum \(\mathbf{P} =\sum _{k,\sigma }{} \mathbf{k} \psi ^{\dag }_{\sigma k}\psi _{\sigma k}\) with the lattice momentum. On the other hand, the superfluid density may show some anisotropy in lattice system. We can use a similar method as done in bosonic system39 to deal with the anisotropy in lattice. In such a case, the superfluid density is usually a rank-two tensor and depends on direction of \(\mathbf{q}\).
In isotropic case, the superfluid density is a scalar, i.e., \(\rho _s=\mathbf{diag} \{\rho _s ,\rho _s ,\rho _s \}\) which does not depend on direction of \(\mathbf{q}\). For generally anisotropic system (for example, Lieb lattice system36, the spin-orbital coupled cold atoms47, etc), the induced current \(\delta \mathbf{j}\) can be expressed in terms of vector \(\mathbf{q}\) and a rank-two tensor m (generally \(\delta \mathbf{j}\) is not parallel to \(\mathbf{q}\) any more), namely
where indices \(i(j)=x,y,z\) in three dimensional space. In order to get Josephson relation in anisotropic system, we introduce the superfluid density \(\rho _{s}({\hat{q}})\) along \({\hat{q}}\) direction, i.e., \({\hat{q}}\cdot \delta \mathbf{j} (\mathbf{r} )\equiv \rho _{s}({\hat{q}}) ({\hat{q}}\cdot \mathbf {\nabla } \delta \theta )\), where \({\hat{q}}\equiv \mathbf{q} /q\) is unit vector along \(\mathbf{q}\) direction. From Eqs. (31) and (38), we get
which is exactly similar to Eq. (34) of isotropic case. Taking \(q x(\mathbf{r} )=-i {\hat{q}}\cdot \mathbf {\nabla } x\), \(q x^*(\mathbf{r} )=i {\hat{q}}\cdot \mathbf {\nabla } x^*\) and Eq. (33) into account, the following discussions for anisotropic case are same with that in the isotropic case. So the superfluid density along direction \({\hat{q}}\) is
which usually depends on the direction of \({\hat{q}}\). Furthermore, from the superfluid density along an arbitrary direction \({\hat{q}}\), i.e.,
it is not difficult to construct a rank-two superfluid density tensor \(\rho _{s;ij}\).
Discussions
In the above derivations, we get the superfluid density in terms of two-particle Green function [the Josephson relation Eq. (37)]. In this section, we will show that for some cases, the above equation can be further simplified. To be specific, if the system has only one gapless collective mode, the superfluid density can be give by the trace of two-particle Green function. When the inversion symmetry is present, the superfluid density can be expressed in terms of the fluctuation matrix of superfluid order parameters.
Only one gapless collective mode
When a system has unique gapless excitation near ground state, e.g., phonon, the Josephson relation can be generalized to a multi-component system with a phase operator method as done in bosonic case39. Here we know near the ground state, the phonon corresponds to total density oscillation. Due to the presence of superfluid order parameter, the density oscillation would couple phase oscillation of order parameter48. Furthermore, all the superfluid order parameters should share a common phase variation, i.e., \(\delta \theta _i(\mathbf{r} )=\delta \theta (\mathbf{r} )\). On the other hand, near the ground state, similarly as Eq. (5), the fluctuation operator of superfluid order parameters may be expressed in terms of phase operator \({\hat{\theta }}\)40
where \(\Delta _{i}\) is the i-th superfluid order parameter in ground state. Under perturbation \(H'\) [see Eq. (25)], the variations of order parameters can be obtained by averaging Eq. (40) with respect to the perturbed ground state. Consequently, the variations of order parameters are \(\delta \Delta _{i}=2i\Delta _{i}\delta \theta (\mathbf{r} )\) with \(\delta \theta (\mathbf{r} )=\langle \delta \hat{ \theta }(\mathbf{r} )\rangle\).
From the above equation, we get the fluctuation operators of order parameters in momentum space
where we use \({\hat{\theta }}^{\dag }_\mathbf{q }={\hat{\theta }}_{-\mathbf{q} }\) for real phase field \(\theta (\mathbf{r} )\) (\(\mathbf{q} \ne 0\)) . From definitions of the \(G_{II}\) and \(F_{II}\) in Eq. (28), we get
where \(Z\equiv \sum _n[\frac{|\langle 0|{\hat{\theta }}_\mathbf{q }|n\rangle |^2}{\omega _{n0}}+\frac{|\langle 0|{\hat{\theta }}_{-\mathbf{q} }|n\rangle |^2}{\omega _{n0}}]>0\) is a real number. When the number of superfluid order parameters is one and \(\Delta\) is real, the relation \(F_{II}(\mathbf{q} ,0)=-G_{II}(\mathbf{q} ,0)\) holds (\(q\rightarrow 0\)) in conventional two-component fermion superfluid.
From Eqs. (33) and (34), we get
where we set \(\Delta ^{*}_{i} \xi _i\equiv \alpha _i e^{i\phi _i}\) with amplitude \(\alpha _{i}\), phase \(\phi _{i}\). So the superfluid density is
On the other hand, we know
So finally we get the Josephson relation
where \(G_{II}(\mathbf{q} ,0)\) is two-particle normal Green function (matrix) at zero-frequency. It is found that the above Eq. (44) can be applied to the case of three superfluid parameters in dice lattice, where there exist one gapless phonon, and two gapped Leggett modes arising from the relative phase oscillations between different superfluid order parameters21. When the number of order parameters \(m=1\), the above equation is reduced to the Josephson relation for conventional two component fermion superfluid11,12.
Superfluid density and pairing fluctuations
In this section, we would give a connection between the two-particle Green function and the pairing fluctuation matrix based on BCS mean field theory and Gaussian fluctuation approximation11. Furthermore, if the system has spatial inversion symmetry, the coefficient matrix \(\mathbf{G} _\mathbf{II }\) is directly proportional to the inverse of pairing fluctuation matrix.
Fist of all, we discuss the results for conventional two-component fermion superfluid. In the following, we assume the pairing gap can be decomposed as the mean field value \(\Delta\) and small fluctuation \(\delta \Delta\) (\(\Delta (\mathbf{r} )=\Delta +\delta \Delta\)). Expanding action S to second order of \(\delta \Delta\) , the partition function49,50,51
where \(S_0\) is the mean-field contribution and Gaussian fluctuation part
where pairing fluctuation field \(\eta ^{\dag }_q=[\Delta ^{*}_q,\Delta _{-q}]\) and \(q=(\mathbf{q} ,i\omega _n)\). \(\omega _n=2n\pi /\beta\) (\(n\in Z\)) is Matsubara frequency, \(\beta =1/T\) is inverse temperature. The fluctuation matrix M is a \(2\times 2\) matrix
where \(G_{ij}(k)\) is matrix element of Nambu–Gorkov Green function. The collective modes are given by zeros of determinant \(Det|M(\mathbf{q} ,i\omega _n\rightarrow \omega +i0^+)|=0\). As \(q\rightarrow 0\), the collective mode is the Anderson–Bogoliubov phonon, which characterizes the density oscillations of superfluid. With the action \(\delta S\) (Gaussian weight), the correlation function (average values of quadratic terms) can be calculated52, i.e.,
On the other hand, we know that the above correlation function has one extra minus sign in comparison with Green function. So the two-particle Green function can be obtained by
In addition, if the system has inversion symmetry, i.e.,
Furthermore, according to Eq. (28), when \(\omega \pm i\epsilon =0\), the Green function satisfy
then the coefficient matrix of Green function \(\mathbf{G} _\mathbf{II }\) can be expressed in terms of the inverse of M, i.e.,
So the superfluid density
Next, for the case of several superfluid order parameters, the proof is similar. Assuming the number of superfluid order parameters is an arbitrary integer m, then Gaussian fluctuation part of action
where M(q) is a \(2m\times 2m\) fluctuation matrix, and pairing fluctuation field \(\eta ^{\dag }_q=[\Delta ^{*}_{1q},\Delta ^{*}_{2q},...,\Delta ^{*}_{mq},\Delta _{1,-q},\Delta _{2,-q},...,\Delta _{m,-q}]\) . With the action \(\delta S\) (Gaussian weight), the correlation functions (and the matrix elements of Green function) can be calculated, i.e.,
Furthermore, in the presence of inverse symmetry, the coefficient matrix can be obtained in terms of the fluctuation matrix, i.e., \(\mathbf{G} _\mathbf{II }=-M^{-1}\). So the superfluid density is given by
During the derivations of Eqs. (37), (44) and (56), we can see that the superfluid density is mainly related to the low energy collective excitations (e.g., phonon for neutral fermion superfluid) and the behaviors of Green functions at long wave length limit. In addition, it is found that the superfluid density in a multi-band fermion superfluid can be divided into two parts, one is the conventional part, which arises from the diagonal matrix elements of current operator, and the other one is the off-diagonal terms (the so called geometric part36,46), which connects with the geometric metric tensor of Bloch states53. The geometric part plays an important role in the understanding of superfluidity of flat band, where the conventional part is negligible36. In addition, it is expected that some other physical quantities, for example, sound velocity20 should also have similar geometric part in a multi-component (or multi-band) superfluid. The Josephson relations [Eqs. (37), (44) and (56)] give the total superfluid density, which not only includes conventional part, but also the geometric part of a multi-band fermion superfluid.
The non-vanishing superfluid density in superconductor can result in the perfect diamagnetism (the Meissner effect)54. The penetration depth of a magnetic field (\(\lambda\)) is related to the superfluid density through relation \(\rho _s\propto 1/\lambda ^2\). So the superfluid density can be experimentally obtained by measuring the penetration depth of magnetic field in superconductor. On the hand, for two-dimensional high-\(T_c\) superconductors, the superfluid density at zero-temperature is related to the superfluid transition temperature by \(T_c\propto \rho _s(T=0)\) (the so called Uemura relation55 . So the superfluid density can be also evaluated by measuring the superconductor transition temperature \(T_c\). For neutral superfluid system, the superfluid density would result in a reduction of moment of inertia of system (from its classical value). So the superfluid density can be obtained through measuring the moment of inertia of superfluid system56,57. In order to measure the moment of inertia of atomic gas, an optical method is proposed through imparting non-zero angular momentum into cold atom gas58.
An example: superfluid density in Haldane–Hubbard model
As an application of the Josephon relations, e.g., Eqs. (44) and (56), the superfluid density is calculated for Haldane–Hubbard model in two-component Fermi gas with on-site attractive interaction \(-U\) (\(U>0\))59. The Hamiltonian for Haldane-Hubbard model is
where \(\mu\) is chemical potential, and \(n_{i\sigma }=c^{\dag }_{i\sigma }c_{i\sigma }\) is particle number operator. \(\epsilon _i=1(-1)\) for sublattice A (B) and M is energy offset between sublattice A and B. \(t_{ij}\) is hopping amplitude between lattice sites i and j, which is t for nearest neighbor sites, \(t'e^{-i\phi }(t'e^{i\phi })\) for clockwise (anticlockwise) hopping between next-nearest neighbor sites59. The distance between nearest neighbor sites is a.
In the following, we focus on the case of \(\phi =\pi /2\) and \(M=0\), where the inversion symmetry is not broken. Due to the presence of two sublattices, Haldane model is a two-band fermion system. In addition, there exist two superfluid order parameters for two sublattices, i.g.,
where i is unit cell index, \(\downarrow (\uparrow )\) are two spin component indices. Furthermore, when \(M=0\), the two order parameters are equal, e.g., \(\Delta _{i,A}=\Delta _{i,B}=\Delta\). When the filling factor \(n=2\) (2 particles per unit cell in half-filling), for weakly interacting case, the system is a band insulator, and the superfluid order parameter vanishes (\(\Delta =0\)). Only when the interaction is strong enough, the system enters a superfluid phase (\(\Delta \ne 0\)). Away from the half-filling, the system is usually in a superfluid phase59. In addition, it is found that, there exists only one gapless excitation near \(q=0\), which corresponds to total density oscillations. The superfluid density can be also calculated with current–current correlation functions9,34,47 or phase twist method46,60. Assuming the superfluid order parameters undergo a phase variation, e.g, \(\triangle _{iA(B)}\rightarrow \Delta _{iA(B)}e^{2i\mathbf{q} \cdot \mathbf{r} _{iA(B)}}\), the superfluid density (particle number per unit cell) tensor \(\rho _{sij}\) can be written as
where \(\Omega\) is thermodynamical potential (per unit cell) in grand canonical ensemble.
Figure 1 shows the evolutions of superfluid density as the interaction increases. The superfluid density is obtained with three different formulas, i.e. Eqs. (58), (56) and (44). First of all, it is found that the superfluid density is isotropic and behaves as a scalar in two-dimensional space, i.e., \(\rho _{sij}=diag(\rho _s,\rho _s)\), which is a consequence of \(C_3\) rotational symmetry of honeycomb lattice46. Secondly, the results from the Josephson relations [Eqs. (56), (44)] are consistent with the results from phase twist method [Eq. (58)]. In addition, When filling factor \(n=2.1\), the superfluid density increases as the interaction gets strong. However when the filling factor \(n=2.8\), the superfluid density gets smaller and smaller when the interaction increases. Such an interesting feature is also reflected in Fig. 2, that when the filling factor is near half-filling (\(n=2\)), the superfluid density increases as the interaction gets strong. However, when the filling is far away from half-filling, the situation is reversed (see Fig. 2).
Figure 2 shows the superfluid density as functions of filling factor (\(n=0\rightarrow 4\)). From the Fig. 2, we can see that the superfluid density is symmetric with respect to half-filling (\(n=2\)) due to particle-hole symmetry59. For weak interaction cases (\(U=2t\) and \(U= 3t\)) and half filling, the system is a insulator (see Ref.59), the superfluid density vanishes (see Fig. 2). For fully occupied case (\(n=4\) particles per unit cell), the system is equivalent to the completely empty case (\(n=0\)) due to the particle-hole symmetry, the system is also a insulator. Consequently, superfluid density is also zero. When the filling factor falls into the middle of upper band (\(n\approx 3\)), the superfluid density reaches its maximum. The appearance of double dome structure for weak interactions in Fig. 2 is in qualitative agreement with the results obtained through dynamical mean-field theory (DMFT) in Ref.46.
Summary
In conclusion, we investigate the Josephson relation for a general multi-component fermion superfluid. It is found that the superfluid density is given in terms of two-particle Green functions. When the superfluid has only one gapless collective excitation, the Josephson relation can be simplified, which is given in terms of superfluid order parameters and trace of Green function. Within BCS mean field theory and Gaussian fluctuation approximation, the matrix elements of Green function can be given in terms of pairing fluctuation matrix elements. Furthermore, in the presence of inversion symmetry, it is shown that the two-particle Green function is directly proportional the inverse of pairing fluctuation matrix. The formulas for superfluid density are quite universal for generic multi-component fermion superfluids, which can be also applied to a multi-band superfluid with complex energy spectra in lattice.
Josephson relation for multi-component fermion superfluid provides a general method for calculations on superfluid densities in terms of two-particle Green functions and fluctuation matrix. Our work would be useful for investigations on the superfluid properties of multi-component (or multi-band) superfluid system with complex pairing structures.
References
Tisza, L. Transport phenomena in helium II. Nature 141, 913. https://doi.org/10.1038/141913a0 (1938).
Bogoliubov, N. N. On the theory of superfluidity. J. Phys. 11, 23 (1947).
Penrose, O. & Onsager, L. Bose–Einstein condensation and liquid helium. Phys. Rev. 104, 576. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.104.576 (1956).
Pollock, E. L. & Ceperley, D. M. Path-integral computation of superfluid densities. Phys. Rev. B 36, 8343. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.36.8343 (1987).
Josephson, B. D. Relation between the superfluid density and order parameter for superfluid he near \(t_c\). Phys. Lett. 21, 608. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9163(66)90088-6 (1966).
Hohenberg, P. C. & Martin, P. C. Microscopic theory of superfluid helium. Ann. Phys. 34, 291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(65)90280-0 (1965).
Bogoliubov, N. N. Lectures on Quantum Statistics (Gordon and Breach, 1970).
Forster, D. Hydrodynamic Fluctuations, Broken Symmetry, and Correlation Functions (Benjamin, 1975).
Baym, G. Mathematical Methods in Solid State and Superfluid Theory (Oliver and Boyd, 1969).
Holzmann, M. & Baym, G. Condensate density and superfluid mass density of a dilute Bose–Einstein condensate near the condensation transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 040402. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.040402 (2003).
Taylor, E. The Josephson relation for the superfluid density in the bcs-bec crossover. Phys. Rev. B 77, 144521. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.144521 (2008).
Dawson, J. F., Mihaila, B. & Cooper, F. Josephson relation for the superfluid density and the connection to the Goldstone theorem in dilute Bose atomic gases. Phys. Rev. A 86, 013603. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.013603 (2012).
Modawi, A. G. K. & Leggett, A. J. Some properties of a spin-1 fermi superfluid: Application to spin-polarized \(^6\)li. J. Low Temp. Phys. 109, 625. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02396913 (1997).
Wu, C., Hu, J. P. & Zhang, S. C. Exact so(5) symmetry in the spin-3/2 fermionic system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 186402. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.186402 (2003).
Alicea, J. Majorana fermions in a tunable semiconductor device. Phys. Rev. B 81, 125318. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.125318 (2010).
Peotta, S. & Törmä, P. Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands. Nat. Commun. 6, 8944 (2015).
Caldas, H., Batista, F. S., Continentino, M. A., Fernanda, D. & Nozadze, D. A two-band model for p-wave superconductivity. Ann. Phys. 384, 211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2017.07.006 (2017).
Caldas, H., Celes, A. & Nozadze, D. Finite temperature phase diagrams of a two-band model of superconductivity. Ann. Phys. 394, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2018.04.022 (2018).
Yerin, Y., Tajima, H., Pieri, P. & Andrea, P. Coexistence of giant cooper pairs with a bosonic condensate and anomalous behavior of energy gaps in the bcs-bec crossover of a two-band superfluid fermi gas. Phys. Rev. B 100, 104528. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.104528 (2019).
Iskin, M. Collective excitations of a bcs superfluid in the presence of two sublattices. Phys. Rev. B 101, 053631. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.053631 (2020).
Wu, Y. R., Zhang, X. F., Liu, C. F., Liu, W. & Zhang, Y. Superfluid density and collective modes of fermion superfluid in dice lattice. Sci. Rep. 11, 13572. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-418100/v1 (2021).
Honerkamp, C. & Hofstetter, W. Ultracold fermions and the su(n) Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 170403. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.170403 (2004).
He, L., Jin, M. & Zhuang, P. Superfluidity in a three-flavor fermi gas with su(3) symmetry. Phys. Rev. A 74, 033604. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.74.033604 (2006).
Zhai, H. Superfluidity in three-species mixtures of fermi gases across Feshbach resonances. Phys. Rev. A 75, 031603(R). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.75.031603 (2007).
Rapp, A., Zaránd, G. & Honerkamp, C. Color superfluidity and baryon formation in ultracold fermions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 160405. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.160405 (2007).
Catelani, G. & Yuzbashyan, E. A. Phase diagram, extended domain walls, and soft collective modes in a three-component fermionic superfluid. Phys. Rev. A 78, 033615. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.033615 (2008).
Ozawa, T. B. Population imbalance and pairing in the bcs-bec crossover of three-component ultracold fermions. Phys. Rev. A 82, 063615. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.82.063615 (2010).
Taie, S., Takasu, Y., Sugawa, S. & Yamazaki, R. Realization of a \(su(2)\times su(6)\) system of fermions in a cold atomic gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 190401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.190401 (2010).
Yip, S. K. Theory of a fermionic superfluid with \(su(2)\times su(6)\) symmetry. Phys. Rev. A 83, 063607. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.063607 (2011).
Cherng, R. & Refael, G. Superfluidity and magnetism in multicomponent ultracold fermions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 130406. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.130406 (2007).
Bistritzer, R. & MacDonald, A. Moiré bands in twisted double-layer graphene. PNAS 108, 12233. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1108174108 (2011).
Morell, E., Correa, P. J. D., Vargas, P. M. & Barticevic, Z. Flat bands in slightly twisted bilayer graphene: Tight-binding calculations. Phys. Rev. B 82, 121407. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.121407 (2010).
Cao, Y. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 43. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature26160 (2018).
Hazra, T., Verma, M. & Randeria, N. Bounds on the superconducting transition temperature: Applications to twisted bilayer graphene and cold atoms. Phys. Rev. X 9, 031049. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031049 (2019).
Julku, A., Peltonen, T. J., Liang, L., Heikkilä, T. T. & Törmä, P. Superfluid weight and Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition temperature of twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 101, 060505(R). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.060505 (2020).
Julku, A., Peotta, S., Vanhala, T. I., Kim, D.-H. & Törmä, P. Geometric origin of superfluidity in the lieb-lattice flat band. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 045303. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.045303 (2016).
Xie, F., Song, Z., Lian, B. & Bernevig, B. A. Topology-bounded superfluid weight in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 167002. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.167002 (2020).
Hu, X., Hyart, T., Pikulin, D. I. & Rossi, E. Geometric and conventional contribution to the superfluid weight in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 237002. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.237002 (2019).
Zhang, Y. Generalized Josephson relation for conserved charges in multicomponent bosons. Phys. Rev. A 98, 033611. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.033611 (2018).
Lifshitz, E. & Pitaevskii, L. Statistical Physics Part 2, Chapter III (Academic Press, 1980).
Pines, D. & Nozières, P. The Theory of Quantum Liquids Vol. 2 (Addison-Wesley, 1990).
Ueda, M. Fundamentals and New Frountiers of Bose–Einstein Condensation (World Scientific, 2010).
Nozières, P. & Pines, D. The Theory of Quantum Liquids Vol. 1 (Addison-Wesley, 1990).
Nozières, P. Theory of Interacting Fermi Systems (Westview Press, 1997).
Abrikosov, A. A., Gor’kov, L. P. & Ye, D. I. Quantum Field Theoretical Methods in Statistical Physics 2nd edn. (Pergamon Press, 1965).
Liang, L. et al. Band geometry, berry curvature, and superfluid weight. Phys. Rev. B 95, 024515. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.024515 (2017).
Zhang, Y. C. et al. Superfluid density of a spin-orbit-coupled Bose gas. Phys. Rev. A. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.033635 (2016).
Ambegaokar, V. & Kadanoff, L. Electromagnetic properties of superconductor. Il Nuovo Cimento 22, 914. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02787879 (1961).
Engelbrecht, J., Randeria, M. & Sáde Melo, C. Bcs to Bose crossover: Broken-symmetry state. Phys. Rev. B 55, 15153. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.55.15153 (1997).
Hu, H., Liu, X. & Drummond, P. Equation of state of a superfluid fermi gas in the bcs-bec crossover. EPL 74, 574. https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2006-10023-y/meta (2006).
Diener, R., Sensarma, R. & Randeria, M. Quantum fluctuations in the superfluid state of the bcs-bec crossover. Phys. Rev. A 77, 023626. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.77.023626 (2008).
Zhang, Y., Ding, S. S. & Zhang, S. Collective modes in a two-band superfluid of ultracold alkaline-earth-metal atoms close to an orbital Feshbach resonance. Phys. Rev. A 95, 043603(R). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.041603 (2017).
Provost, J. P. & Vallee, G. Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states. Commun. Math. Phys. 76, 289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02193559 (1980).
Gennes, P. Superconductivity of Metals and Alloys (Westview Press, 1999).
Uemura, Y. J. et al. Universal correlations between \(t_c\) and \(n_s/m*\) (carrier density over effective mass) in high- \(t_c\) cuprate superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2317. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2317 (1989).
Hess, G. B. & Fairbank, W. M. Measurements of angular momentum in superfluid helium. Phys. Rev. 19, 216. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.216 (1967).
Leggett, A. Quantum Liquids (Oxford University Press, 2006).
Copper, N. R. & Hadzibabic, Z. Measuring the superfluid fraction of an ultracold atomic gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 030401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.030401 (2010).
Zhang, Y.-C., Xu, Z. & Zhang, S. Topological superfluids and the bec-bcs crossover in the attractive Haldane–Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. A 95, 043640. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.043640 (2017).
Zhang, Y. C., Song, S. & Chen, G. Normal density and moment of inertia of a moving superfluid. J. Phys. B Atmos. Mol. Opt. Phys. 53, 15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.033635 (2020).
Acknowledgements
Y.C. Z. are supported by the NSFC under Grants No. 11874127 and startup Grant from Guangzhou University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.C.Z. performed calculations. Y.C.Z. analyzed numerical results. Y.C.Z. contributed in completing the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, YC. Superfluid density, Josephson relation and pairing fluctuations in a multi-component fermion superfluid. Sci Rep 11, 21847 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01261-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01261-y
- Springer Nature Limited