Abstract
Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most deadly cancers with a grave prognosis. Despite continuous efforts to improve remedial values, limited progress has been made. We have reported that dual specificity phosphatase 28 (DUSP28) has a critical role of chemo-resistance and migration in pancreatic cancers. However, its mechanism remains unclear. Here, we further clarify the function of DUSP28 in pancreatic cancers. Analysis using a public microarray database and in vitro assay indicated a critical role of platelet derived growth factor A (PDGF-A) in pancreatic cancer malignancy. PDGF-A was positively regulated by DUSP28 expression at the mRNA and protein levels. Enhanced DUSP28 sensitized pancreatic cancer cells to exogenous PDGF-A treatment in migration, invasion, and proliferation. Transfection with siRNA targeting DUSP28 blunted the influence of administered PDGF-A by inhibition of phosphorylation of FAK, ERK1/2, and p38 signalling pathways. In addition, DUSP28 and PDGF-A formed an acquired autonomous autocrine-signaling pathway. Furthermore, targeting DUSP28 inhibited the tumor growth and migratory features through the blockade of PDGF-A expression and intracellular signaling in vivo. Our results establish novel insight into DUSP28 and PDGF-A related autonomous signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal malignancies with a 5-year survival rate <7%1,2. The poor prognosis results from the difficulty of initial diagnosis, strong migratory nature, and high resistance to conventional cancer therapies3,4,5,6. It is the only cancer in which the prognosis has remained unchanged despite significant advances in medical therapy and surgical techniques during the past few decades7,8. Effective suppression of pancreatic cancers is urgently required.
Dual-specificity phosphatases (DUSPs) are protein phosphatases that tune the activities of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). DUSPs are critical in regulating cancer cell growth and survival9,10. To date, 25 DUSP genes have been listed in Human Genome Organization databases. Based on de-phosphorylation or phosphorylation, these genes can be divided as “classical” or “non-classical” concerning specific residues in various cancer cells11,12,13,14. Although we have previously reported that blockade of DUSP28 suppresses chemo-resistance and migration in pancreatic cancer through the inhibition of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) signaling pathway15, its underlying mechanism remains elusive.
Natural cues, such as autocrine/paracrine growth factor signaling, hypoxia, extracellular matrix, and interactions with neighboring cells orchestrate tumorigenesis and aggressiveness of pancreatic cancer cells in the tumor micro-environment. The constantly evolving tumor micro-environment is rich in growth factors and receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) that amplify a cascade of signaling pathways, leading to metastasis, proliferation, angiogenesis, resistance to cell-death, and the epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT)16,17,18. Platelet-derived growth factor-A (PDGF-A) is one of the most functional growth factors, which is critical for pancreatic cancer progression and is correlated with poor prognosis19. The PDGF-A signaling pathway leads to proliferation, migration, angiogenesis, and metastasis20,21. Targeting the PDGF-A signaling pathway has been reported to induce anti-cancer effects in human pancreatic cancer22,23. Therefore, inhibition of PDGF-A signaling pathway has been suggested as a potential therapy for pancreatic cancer patients.
PDGF-A expression is regulated by mucin 1 (MUC1) during pancreatic cancer progression24. Expressions of c-MET and integrin-gamma 1 (ITG-α1) are fine-tuned by over-expressed DUSP12 in vitro 24. Interestingly, we have also reported that DUSP28 regulates the expressions of MUC5B and MUC16 to link malignancy in a pancreatic cancer cell line25. The collective observations indicate that various donor molecules are functionally correlated with their partners in pancreatic cancer cells.
In this study, we explored the unique role of DUSP28 in pancreatic cancer malignancy by inducing PDGF-A signals. Our novel results demonstrate that DUSP28 plays a pivotal role in pancreatic cancer malignancy, suggesting that targeting DUSP28 might be a smart strategy for blocking pancreatic cancer.
Results
Functional PDGF-A activates malignancy of human pancreatic cancer cells
We previously demonstrated that DUSP28 has a functional role in drug resistance and migratory activity, and tunes the expression of pivotal molecules including MUC5B and MUC16 in human pancreatic cancers15,25. Presently, we further investigated the functional correlation between DUSP28 and specific growth factors as natural cues to aggravate the malignancy of pancreatic cancers. To determine the prominent growth factors in human pancreatic cancer, various growth factor mRNA expression profiles were examined using the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) public microarray database. Analysis of the mRNA profiles suggested that PDGF-A signaling might be important in pancreatic cancers (Fig. 1A). The role of PDGF-A was assessed in human pancreatic cancer cells. Expression levels of soluble PDGF-A in cell culture media were examined using immuno-precipitation. Soluble PDGF-A expressions were relatively different in Panc-1, AsPC-1, and SNU-213 cells, respectively (Fig. 1B). Human recombinant PDGF-A was added exogenously to cultures of AsPC-1, Panc-1, and SNU-213 cells. Exposure to PDGF-A produced similar effects, with dose-dependent increases of viability of the three cell types compared to control cells treated with phosphate-buffered saline (Fig. 1C). Treatment with 50 µg/L PDGF-A significantly induced cell migration in AsPC-1 and Panc-1 cells, but only marginally in SNU-213 cells (Fig. 1D).
DUSP28 regulates PDGF-A expression
To investigate the correlation between DUSP28 and PDGF-A expression in human pancreatic cancer, we examined PDGF-A expression following DUSP28 over-expression in SNU-213 cells, which poorly express DUSP28. Enhanced expression of DUSP28 increased PDGF-A expression at the mRNA and cellular protein levels in SNU-213 cells compared to control plasmid-transfected SNU-213 cells. In addition, soluble PDGF-A protein was also highly increased in culture medium of DUSP28-overexpressing SNU-213 cells compared to control cells (Fig. 2A,B). In contrast, mRNA and cellular protein levels of PDGF-A were down-regulated by si-DUSP28 transfection in Panc-1 cells that strongly expressed DUSP28 (Fig. 2C,D). To confirm the involvement of DUSP28 expression in PDGF-A induction, we analyzed the pancreatic cancer GEO public microarray database. A positive correlation was found between DUSP28 and PDGF-A expression in pancreatic cancer samples (Fig. 2E), with a negative correlation between PDGF-A and DUSP28 in normal pancreas samples (data not shown). These results suggest that PDGF-A expression may be regulated by DUSP28 expression.
Effect of PDGF-A is dependent on DUSP28 expression in human pancreatic cancer cells
To demonstrate the role of DUSP28 expression to exogenous PDGF-A treatment in human pancreatic cancer, we examined the viability, migration, and invasion activities of pancreatic cancer cells following regulation of DUSP28 expression. Overexpression of DUSP28 significantly promoted migratory and invasive activity of SNU-213 cells exogenously treated with PDGF-A compared to control plasmid transfected cells (Fig. 3A,B). PDGF-A also significantly induced proliferation of DUSP28 enhanced SNU-213 cells compared to control plasmid transfected SNU-213 cells, though the difference was weak (Supplementary Fig. 1A). In addition, blocking DUSP28 expression significantly diminished migratory and invasive activities in AsPC-1 and Panc-1 cells stimulated by exogenous PDGF-A compared to those in scrambled si-RNA transfected cells (Fig. 3C,D). Transfection of si-DUSP28 also blunted viability in AsPC-1 and Panc-1 cells stimulated by exogenous PDGF-A compared to scrambled si-RNA transfected cells (Supplementary Fig. 1B).
To elucidate the involvement of DUSP28 expression in intracellular signaling activated by PDGF-A, we examined the signal transduction pathways stimulated by PDGF-A treatment in scrambled si-RNA-and si-DUSP28-transfected AsPC-1 cells. Treatment with PDGF-A significantly decreased tyrosine phosphorylation in a time-dependent manner in si-DUSP28-transfected AsPC-1 cells compared to scrambled si-RNA-transfected cells (Supplementary Fig. 2). To further analyze the detailed mechanism of DUSP28 expression in AsPC-1 cells, phosphorylation levels of various molecules were examined under the same conditions. Treatment with PDGF-A increased the phosphorylation level of FAK (Y576/577) in AsPC-1 cells, but not in si-DUSP28 transfected cells. PDGF-A also strongly induced ERK1/2 and p38 phosphorylation in scrambled si-RNA-transfected AsPC-1 cells, compared to si-DUSP28-transfected cells (Fig. 4A). Similar results were obtained in Panc-1 cells (data not shown). Next, we confirmed the regulation of intracellular signaling by DUSP28 expression using wild-type DUSP28 and mutant DUSP28-C103S overexpression in DUSP28-negative SNU-213 cells. The mutated DUSP28-C103S transfection had little activity compared to those of DUSP28-WT transfection26. Transfection with the wild-type DUSP28 construct induced a time-dependent increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation compared to control plasmid or DUSP28-C103S construct-transfected cells (Fig. 4B). These results suggest that functional DUSP28 regulates the pancreatic cancer malignancy activated by PDGF-A treatment through the intracellular signaling.
DUSP28 frames an autocrine loop with PDGF-A
To demonstrate correlations between DUSP28 and PDGF-A in human pancreatic cancer, we examined the effect of PDGF-A treatment on DUSP28 expression in Panc-1 cells. Treatment with PDGF-A increased DUSP28 mRNA expression levels in Panc-1 cells (Fig. 5A). We next compared the DUSP28 protein level in the cytosolic and nuclear fractions extracted from PDGF-A-treated Panc-1 cells. DUSP28 protein level of PDGF-A-treated Panc-1 cells was significantly higher in the nuclear fraction and lower in the cytosolic fraction, compared to untreated Panc-1 cells (Fig. 5B), indicating that PDGF-A treatment affects both DUSP28 expression and localization. To prove the correlation between PDGF-A and DUSP28, we analyzed DUSP28 protein level following si-PDGF-A transfection in Panc-1 cells. As shown Fig. 5C, protein level of DUSP28 was affected by reduction of PDGF-A levels. To verify the significance of PDGF-A in pancreatic cancer malignancy, we used different types of si-PDGF-A transfection in Panc-1 cells. Transfection of si-PDGF-A inhibited migration, invasion, and viability of Panc-1 cells compared to scrambled si-RNA transfected cells (Fig. 5C–E). Similar results were obtained using AsPC-1 cells (data not shown). These results suggest that DUSP28 and PDGF-A form a unique autocrine loop that specifically affects pancreatic cancer malignancy.
Blocking DUSP28 deadens human pancreatic cancer malignancy
We constructed a stable-reducible sh-DUSP28 Panc-1 cell line to investigate the role of DUSP28 in vivo. We first checked the expression levels and characteristics of established cell lines in vitro. Sh-DUSP28 Panc-1 cells significantly reduced DUSP28 expression and accompanied by limited migration, invasion, and proliferation activities (Supplementary Fig. 3A–E).
The effect of reduced DUSP28 was observed in a sh-DUSP28 and sh-control Panc-1 xenograft models. Control tumors grew to a mean size of 379.02 ± 163.77 mm3 after 25 days transplantation, whereas the shRNA-reducible tumors remained a mean size of 157.30 ± 75.04 mm3 after 25 days transplantation (Fig. 6A). No weight loss was detected in the control and sh-DUSP28 groups of the Panc-1 xenograft models (Fig. 6B). Tumor shapes of sh-DUSP28 tumor models (long/short axis) were close to 1 compared to the control group expressing DUSP28 (Fig. 6C), indicating that DUSP28 expressed tumors seem to have longish characteristic compared to DUSP28 reduced tumors. In addition, we investigated the roles of DUSP28 in the pancreatic cancer migratory characteristics using morphological changes and Western blot analysis. We divided the representative xenograft models into three groups (sh-control; #1 and #2; sh-DUSP28; #3). #2 model of sh-control group showed newly migrated tumors (b*) in the distant area from the injection site (a*) at a rate of 33% (two of six cases). We designated the core and peripheral regions of the tumor models as a and b, respectively (Fig. 6D). Then, we performed the western blot analysis using whole fractions of #1, #2, and #3 samples. DUSP28, PDGF-A, phospho-FAK, phospho-ERK1/2, and phospho-p38 levels were significantly decreased in sh-DUSP28 Panc-1 xenograft models (#3) compared to those of sh-control (#1 and #2) (Fig. 6E). In addition, we performed the western blot analysis using each fraction of a and b in #1, #3 and a* and b* in #2 models using antibodies against E-cadherin and N-cadherin, which are representative molecules of the EMT, along with phospho-FAK. In two tumors expressing DUSP28 (#1 and #2), levels of the N-cadherin and phospho-FAK, phospho-ERK1/2, and phospho-p38 proteins were quite higher in b fractions than those in a fractions, whereas no difference was detected between a and b fractions in DUSP28-reduced tumor sample (#3) (Fig. 6F). These results indicate that the pancreatic cancer malignancy is affected by the DUSP28 expression levels in vivo.
Discussion
The present findings demonstrate that PDGF-A signaling pathway has critical roles in pancreatic cancer, and that its expression is regulated by functional DUSP28 at the mRNA and protein levels. Furthermore, DUSP28 and PDGF-A form a unique autocrine loop that specifically affected the pancreatic cancer malignancy in vitro and in vivo through acquired intracellular signaling. This is the first report to our knowledge in that targeting DUSP28 might be a promising new therapeutic approach to inhibit the malignant pancreatic cancers.
For the current study, we adopted the in silico comparison system to investigate the actual molecules involved using analysis of the pancreatic cancer database compared with those in the normal pancreas25,27. Analysis using the GEO public microarray database showed pancreatic cancer cells have significantly high mRNA expression of PDGF-A compared to cells in normal healthy pancreas. As proof-of-concept, exogenous PDGF-A treatment activated the migration, invasion, and proliferation in pancreatic cancers in vitro.
Functional growth factors have been linked to an increase in pancreatic cancer malignancy28,29. Presently, the expression of PDGF-A was positively accompanied by DUSP28 expression using the computation of PDGF-A mRNA levels as DUSP28 expressions in GEO public microarray database and in vitro RT-PCR and Western blot analysis. This is the first report of DUSP28-related upregulation of oncogenic PDGF-A in pancreatic cancer cells.
We also verified the effectiveness of the correlation of DUSP28 expression and PDGF-A treatment in pancreatic cancer. If DUSP28 only upregulates functionally soluble PDGF-A expression levels, the exogenous PDGF-A treatment should complement the anti-cancer effects of si-DUSP28 transfection. However, exogenous treatment with PDGF-A could not completely compensate for the anti-cancer effects of si-DUSP28 transfection. Therefore, the anti-cancer effects of si-DUSP28 expression seem to be not only dependent on the reduction of soluble form of PDGF-A, which are usually regarded as the leading mechanisms for PDGF-A action, but also on the decline of cellular PDGF-A expression apart from previous findings30.
Most notably, DUSP28 and PDGF-A were shown to form a unique autocrine loop that specifically affects the pancreatic cancer malignancy in vitro and in vivo through acquired intracellular signaling as self-sufficient armament modules. Given that DUSP28 is significantly overexpressed in pancreatic cancers15, our results uniquely suggest that this autocrine loop might be involved in autonomous pancreatic cancer malignancy.
Of interest, remarkable anti-cancer effects of targeting DUSP28 were observed in vivo models. We have previously reported the differential sensitivity to gemcitabine, currently used anti-pancreatic cancer drug as DUSP28 expression levels in human pancreatic cancer in vivo models15. In the present study, remarkable anti-cancer effects of targeting DUSP28 were firstly observed in vivo models through the convincing inhibition of intracellular signaling. PDGF-A is highly expressed in pancreatic cancer and is associated with poor prognosis19,29,31. In agreement with these reports, our results support that low expression of PDGF-A could improve the clinical outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients. DUSP28 also improves the clinical outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer though the difference was not statistically significant.
In summary, our results unveil the mechanisms underlying autonomous malignancy induced by natural cues in pancreatic cancers and suggest that DUSP28, an executor of a unique autocrine loop, could be a target molecule to inhibit pancreatic cancer malignancy. It also provides further insight for treatment of malignant pancreatic cancer.
Materials and Methods
Gene expression analysis
Microarray expression profiles were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) public microarray database. We integrated data sets independently obtained from several research groups using the absolute normalization method SCAN.UPC25. We restricted the integration to Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array platform (GPL570) because the normalization method is dependent on the total number of probes and GPL570 has more probes than GPL96 and GPL97. All data were normalized by the default option of SCAN.UPC. The histological type of each sample was assigned according to sample annotation in GEO. In total, eight data sets were used: GSE9599, −15471, −16515, −17891, −32676, −39409, −42952, and −46385.
Cell culture and reagents
AsPC-1, Panc-1, and SNU-213 human pancreatic cancer cell lines were purchased from the Korean Cell Line Bank (Seoul, Korea). The cells were grown as described previously27. Antibodies for DUSP28 and PDGF-A were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and those for phospho-focal adhesion kinase (FAK), phosphor-FAK (Tyr576/577), phospho-ERK1/2 (Thr202/204), ERK1/2, phospho-p38 (Ser473), p38, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). Recombinant soluble PDGF-A was obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA).
Small interfering (si)RNA transfection
siRNA transfection was performed using an effectene (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as described previously32. Oligonucleotides specific for DUSP28 (sc-94445 and 1120164a/b) and PDGF-A (sc-39703 and 1114379) were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology and Bioneer (Daejeon, Korea), respectively. The scrambled control (sc-37007) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
Measurement of cell viability
To evaluate cell viability with PDGF-A treatment, WST-1 reagent (Nalgene, Rochester, NY, USA) was used as described previously33. After a 10-min incubation at room temperature, the absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA, USA).
Migration assay
Migration assays were performed using 24-Transwell plates (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) according to the supplier’s protocol34. Cells were applied to the upper-chamber containing RPMI without serum for 6 h. Cells that had migrated to the back side of the filter after 24 h were stained. The eluted dye was measured at 560 nm in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reader (Bio-Rad).
Invasion assay
Invasion assays were performed using growth factor-reduced Matrigel (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) coated on 24-Transwell plates according to the supplier’s protocol. Cells were applied to the upper-chamber containing RPMI without serum for 24 h. Cells that had migrated to the back side of the filter after 24 h were stained. The eluted dye was measured at 560 nm in an ELISA reader.
RNA preparation, reverse transcript, and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and converted to cDNA using a Takara RNA PCR kit (Takara Bio Inc, Shiga, Japan) as described previously25. RT-PCR and quantitative real-time PCR analysis were performed using a Takara RT-PCR kit and StepOne Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturers’ protocols. Primers for human DUSP28 were obtained from Bioneer, and the PDGF-A and GAPDH gene primers were designed using Primer Express 3.0 (Applied Biosystems). The primer sequences were DUSP-28, forward: 5′-GCGGGATCCATGGGACCGGCAGAAGCTGGGCG-3′; reverse: 5′-CCCGCTCGAGTCAAGCCTCAGGGCCCAACCCTAA-3′ PDGF-A, forward 5′-GCAAGACCAGGACGGTCATTT-3′; reverse 5′-GGCACTTGACACTGCTCGT-3′ GAPDH, forward: 5′-TCACTGGCATGGCCTTCCGTG-3′; reverse: 5′-GCCATGAGGTCCACCACCCTG-3′.
DUSP28 overexpression plasmid construct
Plasmids expressing FLAG-tagged DUSP28 were constructed to overexpress DUSP28 in human pancreatic cancer cells, as described previously15.
Western blot
Western blotting was performed to evaluate phosphorylation levels, as described previously35. Briefly, si-DUSP28-transfected cells were stimulated with PDGF-A for the indicated times. Bands were measured by densitometry using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Immunoprecipitation assay
SNU-213 cells were transfected with control pcDNA3.1 plasmid and wild-type DUSP28 overexpressing construct in 60-mm dishes. After 4 days, the cultured supernatants were collected. Aliquots of the supernatants were incubated with anti-PDGF-A antibodies or normal IgG antibodies, and Protein G agarose was added (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, UK). Bound proteins were analyzed using Western blotting.
Cell fractionation
The Nuclear/Cytosol Fractionation Kit (Bio Vision, Mountain View, CA, USA) was used according to the manufacturer’s instruction as described previously32. The cytoplasmic fractions were probed with GAPDH and the nuclear fractions were probed with proliferating cell nuclear antigen.
Generation of the DUSP28-specific short hairpin (sh)RNA stable cell line
Plasmids expressing shRNAs and control shRNAs were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology to stably suppress DUSP28 expression using a sh-activated gene silencing vector system. One day after transfection with shRNA constructs, Panc-1 cells were grown in Dulbecco’s complete medium containing 5 µM puromycin for 3 days to select the stable transfectants.
Xenograft tumor model
Balb/c nude mice 6–8 weeks of age were obtained from Orient Bio (Seongnam, Korea). sh-control/Panc-1 (1 × 107) and sh-DUSP28/Panc-1 cells (1 × 107) were injected subcutaneously into the mouse flank as described previously15. Tumor volume was calculated as 0.523 LW2 (L = length, W = width). Tumor shape and body weight were recorded regularly. Animal care and experiments were carried out in accordance with guidelines approved by the animal bioethics committee of Jeju National University (2016-0049).
Statistical analyses
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Student’s t-test was used to compare two independent samples. Groups were compared by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test to identify significant differences using SPSS 12.0 K for Windows software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
References
Smith, K. Pancreatic cancer: FASCINating insights into the metastatic nature of pancreatic cancer. Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology 11, 139, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2014.15 (2014).
Hermann, P. C. et al. Distinct populations of cancer stem cells determine tumor growth and metastatic activity in human pancreatic cancer. Cell stem cell 1, 313–323, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2007.06.002 (2007).
Bardeesy, N. & DePinho, R. A. Pancreatic cancer biology and genetics. Nature reviews. Cancer 2, 897–909, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc949 (2002).
Cano, C. E., Motoo, Y. & Iovanna, J. L. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. TheScientificWorldJournal 10, 1947–1957, https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2010.183 (2010).
Schnelldorfer, T. et al. Long-term survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: is cure possible? Annals of surgery 247, 456–462, https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181613142 (2008).
Guo, J., Lou, W., Ji, Y. & Zhang, S. Effect of CCR7, CXCR4 and VEGF-C on the lymph node metastasis of human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncology letters 5, 1572–1578, https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2013.1261 (2013).
Li, D., Xie, K., Wolff, R. & Abbruzzese, J. L. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 363, 1049–1057, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15841-8 (2004).
Koay, E. J. et al. Transport properties of pancreatic cancer describe gemcitabine delivery and response. The Journal of clinical investigation 124, 1525–1536, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI73455 (2014).
Dhillon, A. S., Hagan, S., Rath, O. & Kolch, W. MAP kinase signalling pathways in cancer. Oncogene 26, 3279–3290, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210421 (2007).
Kim, E. K. & Choi, E. J. Pathological roles of MAPK signaling pathways in human diseases. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1802, 396–405, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2009.12.009 (2010).
Wang, D. et al. DUSP28 contributes to human hepatocellular carcinoma via regulation of the p38 MAPK signaling. International journal of oncology 45, 2596–2604, https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2014.2653 (2014).
Patterson, K. I., Brummer, T., O’Brien, P. M. & Daly, R. J. Dual-specificity phosphatases: critical regulators with diverse cellular targets. The Biochemical journal 418, 475–489 (2009).
Prabhakar, S. et al. Targeting DUSPs in glioblastomas - wielding a double-edged sword? Cell biology international 38, 145–153, https://doi.org/10.1002/cbin.10201 (2014).
Rios, P., Nunes-Xavier, C. E., Tabernero, L., Kohn, M. & Pulido, R. Dual-specificity phosphatases as molecular targets for inhibition in human disease. Antioxidants & redox signaling 20, 2251–2273, https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2013.5709 (2014).
Lee, J., Hun Yun, J., Lee, J., Choi, C. & Hoon Kim, J. Blockade of dual-specificity phosphatase 28 decreases chemo-resistance and migration in human pancreatic cancer cells. Scientific reports 5, 12296, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12296 (2015).
Kim, H. J. & Bar-Sagi, D. Modulation of signalling by Sprouty: a developing story. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology 5, 441–450, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1400 (2004).
Swartz, M. A. et al. Tumor microenvironment complexity: emerging roles in cancer therapy. Cancer research 72, 2473–2480, https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0122 (2012).
Cheresh, D. A. & Stupack, D. G. Regulation of angiogenesis: apoptotic cues from the ECM. Oncogene 27, 6285–6298, https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.304 (2008).
Hoffmann, A. C. et al. High expression of HIF1a is a predictor of clinical outcome in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and correlated to PDGFA, VEGF, and bFGF. Neoplasia 10, 674–679 (2008).
Hellberg, C., Ostman, A. & Heldin, C. H. PDGF and vessel maturation. Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer 180, 103–114, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78281-0_7 (2010).
Appelmann, I., Liersch, R., Kessler, T., Mesters, R. M. & Berdel, W. E. Angiogenesis inhibition in cancer therapy: platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and their receptors: biological functions and role in malignancy. Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer 180, 51–81, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78281-0_5 (2010).
Fujimoto, K. et al. Expression of two angiogenic factors, vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor in human pancreatic cancer, and its relationship to angiogenesis. European journal of cancer 34, 1439–1447 (1998).
Hwang, R. F. et al. Inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor receptor phosphorylation by STI571 (Gleevec) reduces growth and metastasis of human pancreatic carcinoma in an orthotopic nude mouse model. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 9, 6534–6544 (2003).
Cain, E. L., Braun, S. E. & Beeser, A. Characterization of a human cell line stably over-expressing the candidate oncogene, dual specificity phosphatase 12. PloS one 6, e18677, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018677 (2011).
Lee, J., Lee, J., Yun, J. H., Jeong, D. G. & Kim, J. H. DUSP28 links regulation of Mucin 5B and Mucin 16 to migration and survival of AsPC-1 human pancreatic cancer cells. Tumour biology: the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-5079-x (2016).
Jeong, D. G., Kim, S. I., Yun, J. H. & Kim, J. H. Characterization of a Dual-Specificity Protein Phosphatase, Human DUSP28. Journal of Life Science 21, 31–35, https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2011.21.1.31 (2011).
Lee, J. & Kim, J. H. Kaempferol Inhibits Pancreatic Cancer Cell Growth and Migration through the Blockade of EGFR-Related Pathway In Vitro. PloS one 11, e0155264, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155264 (2016).
Gschwind, A., Fischer, O. M. & Ullrich, A. The discovery of receptor tyrosine kinases: targets for cancer therapy. Nature reviews. Cancer 4, 361–370, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1360 (2004).
Heldin, C. H. Targeting the PDGF signaling pathway in tumor treatment. Cell communication and signaling: CCS 11, 97, https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-811X-11-97 (2013).
Sahraei, M. et al. MUC1 regulates PDGFA expression during pancreatic cancer progression. Oncogene 31, 4935–4945, https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2011.651 (2012).
Rahbari, N. N. et al. Expression and prognostic value of circulating angiogenic cytokines in pancreatic cancer. BMC cancer 11, 286, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-286 (2011).
Lee, J. et al. Blockade of VEGF-A suppresses tumor growth via inhibition of autocrine signaling through FAK and AKT. Cancer letters 318, 221–225, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.014 (2012).
Lee, J. et al. Aqueous Extraction of Citrus unshiu Peel Induces Proangiogenic Effects Through the FAK and ERK1/2 Signaling Pathway in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells. Journal of medicinal food 19, 569–577, https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2015.3584 (2016).
Lee, J., Han, S. I., Yun, J. H. & Kim, J. H. Quercetin 3-O-glucoside suppresses epidermal growth factor-induced migration by inhibiting EGFR signaling in pancreatic cancer cells. Tumour biology: the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-3682-x (2015).
Lee, J., Lee, J., Yu, H., Choi, K. & Choi, C. Differential dependency of human cancer cells on vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated autocrine growth and survival. Cancer letters 309, 145–150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2011.05.026 (2011).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2016R1A6A1A03012862).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.W. Lee planned the research, performed the experiments and drafted the main manuscript. J. Lee and C. Choi arranged all data-sets. J. Yun performed RT-PCR and quantitative RT-PCR. S. Cho and S.J. Kim constructed the enhanced DUSP28 plasmid. J.H. Kim supervised the entire project.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, J., Lee, J., Yun, J.H. et al. Autocrine DUSP28 signaling mediates pancreatic cancer malignancy via regulation of PDGF-A. Sci Rep 7, 12760 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13023-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13023-w
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Soluble TGFBI aggravates the malignancy of cholangiocarcinoma through activation of the ITGB1 dependent PPARγ signalling pathway
Cellular Oncology (2022)
-
Atypical induction of HIF-1α expression by pericellular Notch1 signaling suffices for the malignancy of glioblastoma multiforme cells
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2022)
-
Association of Jagged1 expression with malignancy and prognosis in human pancreatic cancer
Cellular Oncology (2020)
-
Blockade of integrin α3 attenuates human pancreatic cancer via inhibition of EGFR signalling
Scientific Reports (2019)
-
Protein tyrosine phosphatases: promising targets in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2019)