Abstract
Adult intestinal stem cells are located at the bottom of crypts of Lieberkühn, where they express markers such as LGR51,2 and fuel the constant replenishment of the intestinal epithelium1. Although fetal LGR5-expressing cells can give rise to adult intestinal stem cells3,4, it remains unclear whether this population in the patterned epithelium represents unique intestinal stem-cell precursors. Here we show, using unbiased quantitative lineage-tracing approaches, biophysical modelling and intestinal transplantation, that all cells of the mouse intestinal epithelium—irrespective of their location and pattern of LGR5 expression in the fetal gut tube—contribute actively to the adult intestinal stem cell pool. Using 3D imaging, we find that during fetal development the villus undergoes gross remodelling and fission. This brings epithelial cells from the non-proliferative villus into the proliferative intervillus region, which enables them to contribute to the adult stem-cell niche. Our results demonstrate that large-scale remodelling of the intestinal wall and cell-fate specification are closely linked. Moreover, these findings provide a direct link between the observed plasticity and cellular reprogramming of differentiating cells in adult tissues following damage5,6,7,8,9, revealing that stem-cell identity is an induced rather than a hardwired property.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
The intestine forms from the pseudostratified gut tube, which becomes patterned during late fetal development into villi and a continuous intervillus region formed by LGR5− and LGR5+ cells, respectively10 (Fig. 1a, Extended Data Fig. 1a–c). The continuous intervillus region is the major site of proliferation in the developing intestine (Extended Data Fig. 1d–f), and crypts subsequently form from this region postnatally11. Despite the apparent transcriptional similarity between fetal and adult LGR5+ cells4, it remains unclear how the fetal immature intestine transitions into the mature structure and how this is orchestrated at the cellular level. In particular, it is not known whether a specialized subset of fetal cells becomes adult intestinal stem cells or whether stem-cell identity is an induced property.
To investigate the role of fetal LGR5+ cells in the establishment of the adult intestinal stem cell population, we performed lineage tracing on this population from embryonic day (E)16.5. Focusing on the proximal part of the small intestine, we observed that, consistent with previous reports3,4,12, progeny of the LGR5-expressing population were maintained into adulthood and thereby contributed to the adult intestinal stem-cell compartment (Fig. 1b). Most of the clones observed at postnatal day (P)0 were, as expected, located in the intervillus regions (Extended Data Fig. 2a). Moreover, it was not until P11 that clones extended as ribbons from the base of crypts to the tips of villi (Supplementary Video 1).
The quantitative contribution from LGR5+ progeny, labelled at E16.5, was slightly greater than the overall degree of tissue expansion (Fig. 1c, Extended Data Fig. 2b–e). This confirmed that LGR5+ cells were an important source of tissue growth. However, given that LGR5+ cells constituted only a small fraction of the cells (fraction of LGR5+ cells/total cells, f = 7.0% ± 0.9%, mean ± s.e.m.) in the proximal part of the small intestine at the time of labelling (Extended data Fig. 2f–h), we reasoned that if LGR5+ cells were the main source of adult epithelium (Fig. 1d) they would have to expand by a ratio 1/f greater than overall tissue to fuel growth and replace cells outside the intervillus regions. Thus, LGR5+ clones should expand 130-fold from P5 to adulthood, nearly an order of magnitude higher than the measured value (Fig. 1e). Expansion of LGR5+ progeny was thus insufficient to explain tissue growth.
To resolve the cellular diversity in the epithelium at E16.5, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis. Consistent with our characterization of LGR5–eGFP, Lgr5 was detected in 7% of the 3,509 cells analysed and—despite detecting only goblet cells by immunostaining—we identified other differentiated cell types, including Paneth cells (Lyz1), entero-endocrine cells (Chga) and enterocytes (Alpi) (Extended Data Fig. 3a, b). In the adult epithelium, the differentiated villi compartment can be separated into at least five transcriptionally distinct populations13. In the fetal intestine, these largely collapse into two populations, and a gene signature for crypt proliferation was detected beyond the LGR5+ compartment, including cells expressing differentiation markers14 (Extended Data Fig. 3c–e). This strongly supported the conclusion that cells in the fetal intestinal epithelium were distinct from their adult counterparts, and that cells expressing differentiation markers had not completed their differentiation program.
To test experimentally how cells outside the intervillus region contributed to tissue growth, we performed fate mapping using a ubiquitously expressed keratin 19 (Krt19)-driven Cre model (Fig. 2a; Extended Data Fig. 3f–h). Although the scRNA-seq data revealed that 49% of Krt19-expressing cells at E16.5 score positive for the proliferation signature, the expansion of clones closely mirrored the overall growth of the tissue (Fig. 2b; Extended Data Fig. 3i), which confirms that Krt19-expressing cells were representative of the tissue. However, we found that both the long-term persistence (defined as the fraction of surviving clones) and size of KRT19-labelled clones were very similar to their LGR5-labelled counterparts (Fig. 2c, d, Supplementary Information, ‘Supporting clonal data’). Several independent measurements confirmed that KRT19 marked a population of cells distributed randomly along the villus–intervillus axis (Extended Data Fig. 3j, k, Supplementary Video 2). Moreover, apoptotic cells at the tips of villi appeared only from P7; this means that KRT19+ clones cannot be lost before P5, and therefore that both P0 and P5 can be used for normalizing clonal persistence (Extended Data Fig. 3l). This strongly suggests that fetal epithelial cells, irrespective of location, contain long-term self-renewal potential and possess the same likelihood of contributing to the adult intestinal stem-cell compartment (Fig. 2e). Of note, although the expansion of the LGR5-targeted clones was slightly higher than that of tissue and KRT19-targeted clones, the difference was small (Fig. 2f). This small difference is likely to reflect a transient proliferative advantage due to their favourable location at the time of induction. Together, these findings indicated that all fetal cells have a similar capacity to contribute to the growth of the intestinal epithelium during development and give rise to adult intestinal stem cells, suggesting that cell fate potential is not fixed in the fetal epithelium.
This finding, however, raised a conundrum, as this implied that cells on villi—which are usually considered as committed to differentiation—contribute substantially in the long term to intestinal growth. Given the influence of gut epithelial geometry on cell fate3,15, we hypothesized that extensive cell rearrangements linked to continuous ‘villification’ could explain this paradox. Between E16.5 and birth, the total number of villi increased approximately sixfold, before reaching the final number characterizing the adult epithelium by P5 (Extended Data Fig. 4a, b). Therefore, we posited that global 3D epithelial sheet movements during villification could provide a mechanism that enables relocation of villus cells to the proliferative intervillus regions and de novo intervillus formation. Detailed 3D reconstruction of the E16.5 intestine revealed that around 30% of villi presented irregular structures of doublet form, with shared mesenchymal clusters within a specific interval of villus heights (Fig. 3a, Extended Data Fig. 4c–e, Supplementary Videos 3, 4). We speculated that this could be a sign of a single villus undergoing fission. Of note, cells found at the juncture between these structures were LGR5− (Extended Data Fig. 4f) and often proliferative (68% of junctures analysed; Fig. 3b, Extended Data Fig. 4g–h, Supplementary Video 5), even though the fission points were distant from the proliferative intervillus regions (Extended Data Fig. 4i). To challenge these observations, we turned to explant cultures, which—despite the intestine not expanding in length—revealed fission events evident from the top of single villi (Fig. 3c, Extended Data Fig. 4j, Supplementary Videos 6, 7). Thus, villi underwent active remodelling, causing pronounced reorganization of the epithelial cell layer.
On the basis of these findings, we turned to a biophysical modelling approach to address whether a minimal model of villus fission could be sufficient to explain the observed long-term equipotency of epithelial cells at E16.5. We modelled both the neutral drift dynamics of proliferative cells restricted to intervillus regions, and the bottom-up influx of cells driving villus elongation, using experimentally derived cell kinetics and geometrical parameters (Supplementary Information ‘Supplementary theory’, Extended Data Fig. 5). Additionally, we incorporated stochastic villus fission (between E16.5 and P4), upon which cells underwent positional changes and a fraction of cells from the parent villus became assigned to the new intervillus region (Fig. 3d). To inform the model, we used the experimentally inferred growth rate of villi number (Extended Data Fig. 6a), so that villus duplication and rapid underlying cell proliferation had a role in fuelling epithelial growth. Within this simplified 2D framework, which takes into account the key features of a more complex 3D process, fission events resulted in the reversible transfer of cells between villus and intervillus regions. We found that, with the experimentally inferred fission rate, just a few days were sufficient to fully erase the positional advantage of progeny from LGR5+ cells, resulting in long-term equipotency among all epithelial cells (Fig. 3e–g). In addition to good reproduction of the global evolution of mean clone size, clonal persistence and rootedness (Fig. 3e–g), the model explained several non-trivial aspects of the observed short-term clonal dynamics. In particular, the model predicted that KRT19+ clones should initially be larger and more dispersed than LGR5+ clones because, even though KRT19+ cells were predominantly induced in non-proliferative regions, they participated more readily in villi fission (Extended Data Fig. 6b–e). Furthermore, the model predicted that these KRT19+ clones should still be less rooted in intervillus regions than LGR5+ clones in the short term (Fig. 3e), with the two converging at later time points. These predictions showed consistently good agreement with the data (detailed statistics in Supplementary Information, ‘Supplementary theory’).
We also performed sensitivity controls on our simulations. First, we assessed the clonal dynamics, only enabling fetal fission from E16.5 to P0. This result showed that fetal remodelling was sufficient to explain the bulk of equipotency between LGR5+ and KRT19+ clones (Extended Data Fig. 7a–c). By contrast, when the model was applied—either in the absence of de novo villus formation or with villus fission without epithelial reshuffling—a satisfactory fit to the data could not be obtained (Extended Data Fig. 7d–i, Supplementary Information, ‘Supplementary theory’). Moreover, a biophysical model based on the current model for villification, which involves successive rounds of de novo villus formation initiating from the intervillus regions16, provided a poor fit to the data as this model does not allow the relocation of villus cells to intervillus regions (Extended Data Fig. 7j–o, Supplementary Information, ‘Supplementary theory’). Finally, our biophysical model predicted that the contribution from the KRT19+ population should be markedly reduced once villi fission slows down; this was corroborated by fate-mapping experiments starting at P0 rather than E16.5 (Extended Data Fig. 8a–c). This strongly suggested that villus remodelling events are required for recruitment of villus cells to the future stem-cell compartment.
To validate independently that cells specifically located on villi contributed to the adult intestinal epithelium, similarly to LGR5+-derived cells, we identified KRT20 as a marker of fetal and adult villi (Fig. 3h, Extended Data Fig. 9a–c). We observed that 27% of KRT20+ cells scored positive for the proliferation signature, even though these cells were confined to villi. Using a Krt20-driven Cre construct, it was evident that labelled cells in the adult epithelium were invariably lost, as reported for other differentiated cell types5,6 (Extended Data Fig. 9b). However, in the fetal epithelium, although the majority of labelled cells were initially detected in villi, clones persisted and generated adult intestinal stem cells (Fig. 3i, Extended Data Fig. 9d, Supplementary Information, ‘Supporting clonal data’). Quantitative analysis confirmed the predictions of the model for rootedness, persistence and size of Krt20 clones, demonstrating once again that intervillus and villus cells display similar behavioural dynamics (Fig. 3j–l). In sum, these findings confirmed that the long-term self-renewal potential of intestinal cells becomes sensitive to location soon after birth17—that is, after major structural changes of villi have ceased and cell migration streams are established.
To further investigate mechanistically the unexpected plasticity of cells from villus (LGR5−CD44−) and intervillus (LGR5+CD44+) regions (Extended Data Fig. 10a–d), we took advantage of a 3D culture system that allows cells to self-organize into villus and crypt domains18,19. When sorted from E16.5 proximal small intestine, both populations grew as spheroids, mimicking the immature nature of the fetal small intestine, with comparable plating efficiencies (Fig. 4a, Extended Data Fig. 10e, f). As reported for bulk cultures19, stimulation with WNT3A was sufficient to convert spheres to budding intestinal organoids, irrespective of their cell-of-origin (Fig. 4b). Notably, CD44+ and CD44− cells isolated from intestine in gestational week 8–10 human fetuses were capable of forming spheroids (Fig. 4c). Finally, to challenge the mouse cultures from the two cell populations, the mouse-derived spheroids were transplanted into conditioned mice20 (Extended Data Fig. 10g–j). Again, both cell populations engrafted with similar efficiencies and established CD44+ adult stem-cell niches at the bottom of crypts and gave rise to appropriate differentiated lineages including Paneth cells (LYZ1+), goblet cells (MUC2+) and enterocytes (ALPI+) (Fig. 4d, e, Extended Data Fig. 10k). Altogether, these findings demonstrated that fetal villi and intervillus cells had similar potential to grow in vivo and in vitro, and exhibited the same regenerative potential.
These results of in vivo lineage tracing in combination with biophysical modelling and in vitro analysis of mouse and human fetal samples demonstrate that fetal intestinal cells—irrespective of their location and marker expression—represent equipotent precursors of adult intestinal stem cells (Extended Data Fig. 10l). We propose that the process of villi fission and tissue bending during intestinal morphogenesis provides a biophysical mechanism to remodel the local microenvironment, allowing cells to switch reversibly between LGR5− and LGR5+ states. This behaviour mirrors findings from various adult injury models, in which Lgr5+ cells lost through damage were subsequently replenished through recolonization by LGR5− cells5,6,8,9,21,22. Notably, the fission mechanism resembled the proposed model for villification in avians, in which longitudinal epithelial ridges generate a zig-zag pattern that breaks up into individual villi15 and villus geometry was proposed to define gradients of growth factors, thereby establishing distinct cell fates3. We propose that these growth-factor gradients impose specific expression patterns without irreversibly changing cell fates. This is evident from the profound cellular plasticity observed among cells in villi and intervillus regions with respect to their long-term self-renewal potential. This could be a generic property of developmental systems, ensuring the robust coordination of morphogenesis and fate specification23.
These findings have key implications for the improvement of differentiation protocols to, for example, generate intestinal stem cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells24,25. Consistent with our findings, fetal-like intestinal cells derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells generate cells with characteristics of adult stem cells only upon transplantation26,27,28,29. In this sense, the plastic fetal precursor state, which retains the capacity to be induced into an adult stem cell state, represents an attainable target for our strategies to direct differentiation. Understanding how these fetal precursors are induced to become adult stem cells will provide insight into how the process can be orchestrated in vitro. As fetal progenitors have been identified in multiple tissues, and all appear to mature in a similar manner upon transplantation26,27,28,29, the precursor state is likely to be a general intermediate during tissue maturation. It is therefore tempting to speculate that the plasticity observed during tissue regeneration could be explained via the equipotent progenitor state observed during fetal development.
METHODS
Mice
Unless otherwise specified, C57BL/6J mice (purchased from Taconic) were used for all the experiments. Transgenic murine lines used in the experiments have been previously described: Rosa26-mT/mG (ref. 30), Lgr5-eGFP-ires-creERT2 (ref. 2), Krt19-creERT (ref. 31), RAG2−/− (Taconic), Rosa26-lsl-Confetti (ref. 32), Lgr5-DTR-eGFP (ref. 22), Villin-cre33, Krt20-T2A-creERT2 (Jackson laboratories, stock no. 030600), and Rosa26-lsl-tdTomato34. CD1 mice (Janvier) were used as foster mothers in the lineage-tracing experiments.
None of the animals used in these studies had been subjected to prior procedures and were drug- and test-naive. All animals were housed in specific-pathogen-free animal facilities, in either open or individually ventilated cages always with companion mice, and cages were placed under a 12-h light–dark cycle. Food and water were provided ad libitum. Randomized cohorts including both male and female animals were distributed in an unblinded manner into the experimental time points for analysis. Sample sizes were selected to provide sufficient statistical power for analysis. The National Animal Ethics Committee in Denmark reviewed and approved all animal procedures (Permit numbers 2013-15-2934-00756 and 2013-15-2934-00927).
Lineage-tracing experiments and quantification
Pregnant females carrying embryos at E16.5 were intraperitoneally injected with the indicated amount of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OHT, Sigma) and progesterone (50 μg, Sigma) in corn oil (Sigma). Pregnant Lgr5-eGFP-ires-creERT2 and Krt20-T2A-creERT2 mice were injected with 1 mg 4OHT; pregnant Krt19-creRT2 mice were injected with 100 μg 4OHT. Pregnant Krt19-creERT;Rosa26mT/mG mice were injected with 1 mg 4OHT. Newborn Krt19-creERT;Rosa26-lsl-Confetti and Lgr5-eGFP-ires-creERT2;Rosa26-lsl-Confetti P0 mice were injected with 10 μg 4OHT. Lgr5-eGFP-ires-creERT2 mice were delivered by caesarean section at E18.5 and newborns were transferred to CD1 foster mothers. The proximal half of the small intestine was collected at the time points indicated in the figures. In Krt19-creERT;Rosa26-lsl-Confetti and Lgr5-eGFP-ires-creERT2;Rosa26-lsl-Confetti quantifications, only red clones were considered; for Krt20-T2A-creERT2, red and YFP clones were considered. The projections of volume, number of villi and number of clones (persistence) at the indicated time points were calculated by multiplying the volume/unit area, number of villi/unit area and number of clones/unit area by the total surface area of the proximal half of the intestine at each time point analysed.
Transplantation
Transplantation was performed using RAG2−/− mice as recipients, essentially as previously described20. In brief, colitis was induced in RAG2−/− mice (3–6 months old) by administration of 3.3% DSS (MP Biomedicals; molecular mass 36,000–50,000) in the drinking water for 5 days followed by normal water. Mice were subsequently infused with cultured intestinal epithelial cells derived from Rosa26mT/mG mice on day 8 and day 11 after the beginning of DSS treatment. Cells were cultured in Matrigel as described below. At passage 5, epithelial cells were released from matrix, and mechanically dissociated into epithelial sheets. After washing, cell fragments from approximately 600 organoids were resuspended in 300 µl 5% Matrigel in PBS. Under general anaesthesia (isoflurane; Piramal Healthcare), a flexible catheter was inserted into the colon of mice and the cell suspension was subsequently infused slowly into the colonic lumen. The anus was sealed with surgical histoacryl glue (B. Brawn) for 3 h to reduce flow in the colon. The animals were carefully monitored during the colitis and following transplantation. Two weeks after the second transplantation, recipient mice were killed and colons were collected and processed for analysis.
Human fetal samples
Human fetal tissue collection was approved by the regional ethics committee (permit number H-1-2012-007 and 258206). The adult patients gave their informed written and oral consent. None of the terminations were for reasons of fetal abnormality and the fetal tissue was available following elective termination of pregnancy during first trimester.
Imaging and histology
Whole-mount immunostaining
The proximal half of the small intestine was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) from 3 h to overnight at 4 °C. The samples were then dissected into smaller fragments (approximately 4 mm × 4 mm) followed by dehydration in methanol. Samples were stored in methanol at −20 °C. Then, the tissue was rehydrated in a PBS series before staining with all steps being performed at 4 °C. In brief, samples were blocked and permeabilized in 1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma), 0.5% Triton X-100 (Triton X-100 Surfact-Amps Detergent Solution, Thermo Fisher) in PBS for 24 h. Primary antibodies (indicated in Supplementary Table 1) were incubated in 1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma), 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 48 h. Tissue was subsequently washed in 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS overnight. Secondary antibodies (indicated in Supplementary Table 1) were incubated in 1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma), 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 48 h and the tissue was subsequently washed overnight with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS. Diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI; 1 µM; Sigma) was used to counterstain nuclei in the indicated experiments. Samples were then dehydrated in methanol and kept at −20 °C. Samples were cleared using 1:2 benzyl alcohol:benzyl benzoate (BABB) (Sigma). In brief, 5 changes (1 min each) of BABB:methanol 1:1, then 5 changes (2 min each) of BABB. The samples were subsequently mounted within a Fast well (FW20-FastWells 20-mm diameter × 1.0-mm depth or 25 × 25 mm, Grace-Biolabs). Z-stack images were acquired using laser-scanning confocal microscopy (Leica TSC SP8). Three-dimensional reconstructions were done using Fiji software and clone volume was assessed using Volocity v.6.3.0 (Perkin Elmer).
EdU staining
Mice were intraperitoneally injected with EdU (pregnant females carrying embryos at E16.5 with 250 μg; P0 with 25 μg; P5 with 31.25 μg, P11 with 37.5 μg and adult with 250 μg) and processed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Click-iT Plus EdU Alexa Fluor 488 Flow Cytometry Assay Kit or Click-iT EdU Alexa Fluor 555 Imaging Kit, Thermo Fisher). Following a 1-h chase, the tissue was processed as described in the previous section. Before (2D staining) or after (whole-mount immunostaining) primary and secondary antibody staining, EdU was developed using Click-iT technology. DAPI (1 µM; Sigma) was used to counterstain nuclei in the indicated experiments
Two-dimensional immunostaining
Proximal halves of the small intestine were fixed with 4% PFA from 3 h to overnight at 4 °C and following dehydration, embedded in paraffin. Sections (5–8-µm thick) were prepared with a microtome.
The luminal perimeter was measured at the indicated time points in sections of small intestines stained with Haematoxylin QS (Vector) and Eosin Solution Aqueous (Sigma). Alkaline phosphatase staining was performed using Vector Red Substrate Kit (Vector). Images were acquired using NDP Zoomer Digital Pathology (Hamamatsu) and subsequently analysed in NDP.view2 software.
To perform immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence on paraffin-embedded tissues, sections were rehydrated before antigen retrieval. Diva Decloaker solution (Biocare Medical) and Retriever 2100 (Aptum) were used at this step. Then, blocking and permeabilization was performed in 10% adult bovine serum (Sigma), 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for at least 1 h at room temperature. Primary antibodies (indicated in Supplementary Table 1) were incubated overnight in 10% adult bovine serum (Sigma) at 4 °C. Secondary antibodies (indicated in Supplementary Table 1) were incubated for 1–2 h at room temperature in 0.5% bovine serum albumin (Sigma) or in the ready-to-use solutions (Vector), when using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. For immunofluorescence, DAPI (1 µM; Sigma) was used to counterstain nuclei in the indicated experiments. For immunofluorescence, Alexa-Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies were used (detailed in Supplementary Table 1), except with anti-CD44 antibody (indicated in Supplementary Table 1), when TSA Plus Cyanine 3 and Fluorescein System (Perkin Elmer) was used. For immunohistochemistry, secondary antibodies were developed using DAB (ImmPACT DAB Peroxidase (HRP) Substrate, Vector) and nuclei were subsequently visualized with Haematoxylin QS (Vector). Fluorescent images were acquired using laser-scanning confocal microscopes (Leica TSC SP8), images of engrafted patches were acquired using a Zeiss Imager M2 microscope equipped with ORCA-R2 Digital CCD camera C10600 (Hamamatsu), and immunohistochemistry samples were imaged using NDP Zoomer Digital Pathology (Hamamatsu). All images were subsequently analysed in NDP.view2 software, Fiji and Adobe Photoshop CS6.
Sequential sectioning of grafted epithelial patches
Two weeks after the second transplantation, recipient RAG2−/− mice were killed by cervical dislocation and colons were dissected. After washing with PBS, colons were opened longitudinally and imaged by stereomicroscopy (Leica M165FC). Engrafted patches were dissected from the colon and fixed with 4% PFA for 3 h followed by incubation in 20% sucrose solution in PBS overnight. Tissue fragments were embedded in OCT. Eight-micrometre sequential frozen sections were analysed histologically as described above.
Intestinal live imaging of explant cultures
The proximal half of small intestine was isolated from E16.5 embryos. The intestine was subsequently cut open longitudinally and attached from both ends of the intestine to a glass-bottomed plate using surgical histoacryl glue (B. Brawn). Explant cultures were covered in BGJb Medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 0.1 mg/ml ascorbic acid (Sigma) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Life technologies, GIBCO) as previously described35. Samples were imaged using a Delta Vision deconvolution microscope (GE Healthcare) and Widefield Zeiss AxioImager microscope.
Isolation of epithelial cells from the fetal epithelium and purification by flow cytometry
Fetal small intestine from mouse or human fetuses was dissected and incubated with collagenase solution (125 µg/ml in PBS) for 45 min at 37 °C and subjected to vigorous pipetting every 15 min using a P1000 pipette. Released cells were pelleted and resuspended in PBS supplemented with 1% BSA and incubated with fluorescent-conjugated primary antibodies (indicated in Supplementary Table 1) for 30 min on ice. After washing, DAPI (Sigma; 1 µM) was added to the cell suspension to facilitate exclusion of dead cells by flow cytometry. Purified cell populations were subsequently isolated using a FACSAria I or III (BD Bioscience). After isolation, cells were embedded in growth factor reduced Matrigel (Corning) in the presence of human EGF (Peprotech; 50 ng/ml), murine noggin (Peprotech; 100 ng/ml), human noggin (Peprotech; 100 ng/ml), mouse R-spondin1 (R&D Systems; 500 ng/ml) as previously reported20. In some experiments Wnt3a-conditioned medium (50% in volume) was added as a supplement as indicated. Prostaglandin E2 (2.5 μM, Sigma) was added to the human fetal cultures. In all experiments using mouse organoids, cells were collected from wild-type C57/BL6 mice (Taconic). Cells were cultured in a dome-shaped 25-µl extracellular matrix droplet and 250 µl culture medium was added to each well in a 48-well plate (flat bottom; Corning). Medium was subsequently changed every 2–3 days. For human samples we observed no discernable effect of whether the pregnant mother was a smoker or not.
Single-cell sequencing
Cells were isolated from a pool of six proximal small intestines (1 cm in length each) at E16.5 using collagenase treatment and cell sorting as described in the previous section. DAPI−CD31−CD45−EpCAM+ cells (20,000 cells) were processed using 10x Genomics Chromium protocols (version 2 chemistry).
RNA-sequencing data analysis
Reads were de-multiplexed, aligned and counted using the 10x Genomics Cellranger v.2.1.0 software36. The refdata-cellranger-mm10-1.2.0 reference was downloaded from the 10x Genomics website (https://support.10xgenomics.com/). The resulting filtered count matrix was loaded into Pagoda 2 (ref. 37) for data exploration and Seurat 2.3 (ref. 38) for visualization purposes. Genes that were expressed in fewer than 5 cells were removed. Cells expressing less than 200 genes, more than 6,000 genes or more than 10% mitochondrial genes were removed. Before filtering, the dataset consisted of 3,770 cells. After quality control, 3,509 cells remained.
Scores for signatures for adult epithelium single-cell zones 1–5 and the proliferation signature were calculated using Seurat’s AddModuleScore function. The corresponding gene lists were extracted from Supplementary Table 114,15.
Cells were considered as positive for a particular zone signature13 when their expression was higher than mean + 1 s.d. for that particular signature. Cells were considered as positive for the proliferation signature when their scores were >0 in Seurat 2.3’s normalized expression value. Similarly, cells were considered as positive for individual genes when their scores were >0 in Seurat’s normalized expression value.
Statistics
The number of biological and technical replicates and the number of animals are indicated in figure legends and text. All tested animals were included. Sample size was not predetermined. For all experiments with error bars, the s.e.m. or s.d. was calculated to indicate the variation within each experiment or sample. Statistical t-tests were used to assess significance in the indicated experiments.
Reporting Summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this paper.
Data availability
RNA sequencing data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the ArrayExpress database at EMBL-EBI (www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress) under accession number E-MTAB-7660. Raw data used are provided in the Source Data files. All other data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code availability
Code for the biophysical modelling is provided as a Supplementary Information file.
References
Clevers, H. The intestinal crypt, a prototype stem cell compartment. Cell 154, 274–284 (2013).
Barker, N. et al. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature 449, 1003–1007 (2007).
Shyer, A. E., Huycke, T. R., Lee, C., Mahadevan, L. & Tabin, C. J. Bending gradients: how the intestinal stem cell gets its home. Cell 161, 569–580 (2015).
Nigmatullina, L. et al. Id2 controls specification of Lgr5+ intestinal stem cell progenitors during gut development. EMBO J. 36, 869–885 (2017).
Tetteh, P. W. et al. Replacement of lost Lgr5-positive stem cells through plasticity of their enterocyte-lineage daughters. Cell Stem Cell 18, 203–213 (2016).
van Es, J. H. et al. Dll1+ secretory progenitor cells revert to stem cells upon crypt damage. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 1099–1104 (2012).
Buczacki, S. J. et al. Intestinal label-retaining cells are secretory precursors expressing Lgr5. Nature 495, 65–69 (2013).
Yui, S. et al. YAP/TAZ-dependent reprogramming of colonic epithelium links ECM remodeling to tissue regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 22, 35–49 (2018).
Nusse, Y. M. et al. Parasitic helminths induce fetal-like reversion in the intestinal stem cell niche. Nature 559, 109–113 (2018).
Guiu, J. & Jensen, K. B. From definitive endoderm to gut-a process of growth and maturation. Stem Cells Dev. 24, 1972–1983 (2015).
Sumigray, K. D., Terwilliger, M. & Lechler, T. Morphogenesis and compartmentalization of the intestinal crypt. Dev. Cell 45, 183–197 (2018).
Mustata, R. C. et al. Identification of Lgr5-independent spheroid-generating progenitors of the mouse fetal intestinal epithelium. Cell Reports 5, 421–432 (2013).
Moor, A. E. et al. Spatial reconstruction of single enterocytes uncovers broad zonation along the intestinal villus axis. Cell 175, 1156–1167 (2018).
Merlos-Suarez, A. et al. The intestinal stem cell signature identifies colorectal cancer stem cells and predicts disease relapse. Cell Stem Cell 8, 511–524 (2011).
Shyer, A. E. et al. Villification: how the gut gets its villi. Science 342, 212–218 (2013).
Walton, K. D. et al. Hedgehog-responsive mesenchymal clusters direct patterning and emergence of intestinal villi. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 15817–15822 (2012).
Itzkovitz, S., Blat, I. C., Jacks, T., Clevers, H. & van Oudenaarden, A. Optimality in the development of intestinal crypts. Cell 148, 608–619 (2012).
Sato, T. et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt–villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature 459, 262–265 (2009).
Fordham, R. P. et al. Transplantation of expanded fetal intestinal progenitors contributes to colon regeneration after injury. Cell Stem Cell 13, 734–744 (2013).
Yui, S. et al. Functional engraftment of colon epithelium expanded in vitro from a single adult Lgr5+ stem cell. Nat. Med. 18, 618–623 (2012).
Ritsma, L. et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis revealed at single-stem-cell level by in vivo live imaging. Nature 507, 362–365 (2014).
Tian, H. et al. A reserve stem cell population in small intestine renders Lgr5-positive cells dispensable. Nature 478, 255–259 (2011).
Chan, C. J., Heisenberg, C. P. & Hiiragi, T. Coordination of morphogenesis and cell-fate specification in development. Curr. Biol. 27, R1024–R1035 (2017).
Hannan, N. R. et al. Generation of multipotent foregut stem cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Reports 1, 293–306 (2013).
Spence, J. R. et al. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into intestinal tissue in vitro. Nature 470, 105–109 (2011).
Watson, C. L. et al. An in vivo model of human small intestine using pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Med. 20, 1310–1314 (2014).
Sun, X. et al. Directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into thymic epithelial progenitor-like cells reconstitutes the thymic microenvironment in vivo. Cell Stem Cell 13, 230–236 (2013).
McCracken, K. W. et al. Modelling human development and disease in pluripotent stem-cell-derived gastric organoids. Nature 516, 400–404 (2014).
Kroon, E. et al. Pancreatic endoderm derived from human embryonic stem cells generates glucose-responsive insulin-secreting cells in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 443–452 (2008).
Muzumdar, M. D., Tasic, B., Miyamichi, K., Li, L. & Luo, L. A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis 45, 593–605 (2007).
Means, A. L., Xu, Y., Zhao, A., Ray, K. C. & Gu, G. A CK19CreERT knockin mouse line allows for conditional DNA recombination in epithelial cells in multiple endodermal organs. Genesis 46, 318–323 (2008).
Snippert, H. J. et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 143, 134–144 (2010).
el Marjou, F. et al. Tissue-specific and inducible Cre-mediated recombination in the gut epithelium. Genesis 39, 186–193 (2004).
Madisen, L. et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 133–140 (2010).
Walton, K. D. & Kolterud, A. Mouse fetal whole intestine culture system for ex vivo manipulation of signaling pathways and three-dimensional live imaging of villus development. J. Vis. Exp. 91, e51817 (2014).
Zheng, G. X. et al. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 14049 (2017).
Fan, J. et al. Characterizing transcriptional heterogeneity through pathway and gene set overdispersion analysis. Nat. Methods 13, 241–244 (2016).
Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E. & Satija, R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 411–420 (2018).
Acknowledgements
We thank members of the Jensen and Simons laboratories for comments and suggestion; H. Clevers (Rosa26-lsl-Confetti and Lgr5-eGFP-ires-creERT2), F. de Sauvage (Genentech) (Lgr5-iDTR-eGFP), A. McMahon (Krt20-T2A-creERT2) and G. Gu (Krt19-creERT) for gifts of mice; and Y. Antoku in Imaging core facilities at BRIC and the Center for Advanced Bioimaging at University of Copenhagen for experimental support. This work was supported by Lundbeck Foundation (R105-A9755 to K.B.J.; R190-2014-3904 to T.H.P.), the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF14OC0012927 to K.B.J. and NNF16OC0019920 to K.K.), the Carlsberg Foundation, EMBO Young Investigator programme (to K.B.J.), the Marie Curie fellowship programme (S.Y. and J.G.; 625238/FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IIF, 656099/H2020-MSCA-IF-2014) and the Wellcome Trust (098357/Z/12/Z to B.D.S., 110326/Z/15/Z to E.H.). B.D.S. also acknowledges funding from the Royal Society E. P. Abraham Research Professorship (RP\R1\180165). This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreements STEMHEALTH ERCCoG682665 and INTENS 668294 to K.B.J.). The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Stem Cell Biology and the Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research are supported by Novo Nordisk Foundation grants (NNF17CC0027852 and NNF18CC0034900, respectively).
Reviewer information
Nature thanks Hans Clevers, Fred de Sauvage and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.G. and K.B.J. conceived the project. J.G., E.H., B.D.S. and K.B.J. designed experiments. J.G., S.Y., S.U. and M.M. performed experiments. A.J., S.P., L.L., L.S.M., C.Y.A., L.L.T., K.J.H., A.L. and R.H.O. collected and processed human fetal material. S.D., T.H.P. and K.K. analysed single-cell sequencing data. E.H. and B.D.S. designed and performed the mathematical modelling. J.G. wrote the manuscript with input from K.B.J., E.H. and B.D.S. J.G., S.Y., B.D.S. and K.B.J. acquired funding. B.D.S. and K.B.J. supervised the project.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 LGR5+ cells and proliferative cells are restricted to the intervillus regions.
a, Detection of E-cadherin (red) and GFP (Lgr5-DTR-eGFP) at E13.5 and E16.5 in proximal and distal small intestine. Tissue is counterstained with DAPI (cyan). A representative image from each time point and intestinal segment is shown (n = 3 mice analysed). b, In situ hybridization of endogenous Lgr5 at E13.5 and E16.5 in proximal and distal small intestine. Tissue is counterstained with DAPI (cyan). A representative image from each time point and intestinal segment is shown (n = 3 mice analysed). c, Detection of E-cadherin (magenta) and GFP (Lgr5-DTR-eGFP) in intestinal whole mount at E16.5 in proximal small intestine. A representative image from n = 3 independent samples is shown. d, Detection of Ki67 and EdU (red) following a 1-h pulse at the indicated time points (left and right, respectively). Three mice were analysed at each time point and a representative image is shown. Scale bars, 50 μm. e, f, Quantification of number and location of EdU+ cells as depicted (e) from at least ten intervillus regions per mouse at E16.5, P5, P11 and adult, and 20 intervillus regions per mouse at P0 up to position 10 and position 17 (adult). Samples from three mice were analysed at each time point. Data are mean ± s.e.m.
Extended Data Fig. 2 LGR5-derived clones are located in intervillus regions and qualitative and quantitative morphological analysis of the intestine from fetal to adult stages.
a, Quantification of localization of labelled clones at P0 following labelling at E16.5 in Rosa26-lsl-Confetti;Lgr5-eGFP-ires-creERT2 mice. Villi containing clones were divided into three equal regions (T, top; M, middle; B, bottom) based on the z projections in 3D to determine the clone localization at P0 (n = 24 clones). b, Detection of E-cadherin (red) in whole mounts at the indicated time points. Scale bars, 100 μm. A minimum of three mice were analysed at each time point and representative images are shown (E16.5 n = 3, P0 n = 9, P5 n = 9, P11 n = 9, adult n = 9 mice). c, Measurements of the total epithelial volume per unit area based on detection of E-cadherin relative to the area of the intestine (samples from b). Dots represent independent biological samples; data are mean ± s.e.m. d, Length of the small intestine at E16.5 (n = 12), P0 (n = 3), P5 (n = 3), P11 (n = 8) and adult (n = 4). Dots represent individual mice and lines represent the mean ± s.e.m. e, Luminal perimeter of the small intestine at E16.5, P0, P5, P11 and adult. Dots represent individual mice (n = 3) and lines represent the mean ± s.e.m. f–h, Quantification of GFP as a proxy for LGR5 in proximal and distal small intestine at E13.5 (n = 3 mice both proximal and distal) and E16.5 (n = 7 mice proximal, n = 5 mice distal) small intestines (f). g, Fluorescence minus one (GFP) controls used to establish the positive gates. h, Representative FACS dot plot illustrating the gating strategy to quantify the size of the LGR5–DTR–eGFP+ population (gate, DAPI−CD31−CD45−EpCAM+). Dots represent measurement in individual mice; data are mean ± s.e.m.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Characterization of the fetal small intestinal epithelium.
a, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) plots from scRNA-seq of epithelial cells from the proximal small intestine showing expression of intestinal stem-cell (Lgr5) and differentiation markers (Muc2, Lyz1, ChgA and Alpi). Darker colour indicates higher normalized gene expression. Each dot represents a cell; a total of 3,509 cells is shown. b, Detection of differentiation markers in E16.5 and adult small intestine. Tissue is counterstained with haematoxylin and eosin. Scale bar, 250 μm. Samples from n = 3 mice were analysed at each time point and representative images are shown. c, Cartoon depicting that adult villi are transcriptionally zonated in five regions numbered from bottom to top (z, zone). d, t-SNE plots showing enrichment of villi clusters in the scRNA-seq from E16.5 small intestine. e, t-SNE plot showing the enrichment of a proliferation signature in specific cell populations (left) and fraction of cells in each subpopulation scoring positive for the proliferation gene signature (right). A darker colour in the t-SNE plot indicates higher expression levels of the proliferation gene signature. f, t-SNE plot showing expression of keratin 19 (Krt19). Darker colour indicates higher normalized gene expression levels. g, Detection of KRT19 (red) and GFP (Lgr5-DTR-eGFP) at E16.5 in proximal small intestine. Tissue is counterstained with DAPI (cyan). Scale bars, 50 μm. Samples from three mice were analysed and a representative image is shown. h, Detection of KRT19 (red) at different time points in tissue from the small intestine. Tissue is counterstained with DAPI (cyan). Scale bars, 50 μm. Samples from three mice were analysed per time point and representative images are shown. i, Relative volume (projected) of KRT19 clones and epithelium based on E-cadherin. E-cadherin is also shown in Fig. 1c and KRT19 clones are also shown in Fig. 2. KRT19 clones, number of biologically independent samples: P0 n = 1; P5 n = 3, P11 n = 6, adult n = 3; E-cadherin, number of biologically independent samples: P0 n = 9, P5 n = 9, P11 n = 9, adult n = 9. j, Quantification of the localization of labelled clones at P0 following administration of 4-hydroxytamoxifen at E16.5 in Rosa26-lsl-Confetti;Krt19-creERT mice. Villi containing clones were divided in three equal regions (T, top; M, middle; B, bottom) based on the z projection in 3D to determine where clones were located at P0 (n = 27). k, Detection of GFP (green) and RFP (red) in whole mounts from the proximal part of the small intestine isolated from mT/mG Krt19-creERT mice at P0 following induction at E16.5. A representative image of n = 3 biologically independent samples is shown. Scale bars, 25 μm. l, Apoptotic cells were detected by cleaved caspase-3. Arrowheads demarcate positive cells in inserts. Samples from three mice were analysed per time point and representative pictures are shown. Scale bars, 250 μm.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Villi formation and parameter description of villi fissions.
a, Total number of villi (projected) in the proximal half of the small intestine based on equal density along the length. Samples from three mice were analysed per time point. Each dot represents a mouse; data are mean ± s.e.m. b, The fold change in villi numbers between the indicated time points based on three samples analysed per time point. Each dot represents an independent sample and lines represent the mean ± s.e.m. c, Villus height at the different time points. The demarcated red lines indicate the interval containing villi with sharing stroma. The length was assessed in 25 villi per mouse and in 3 mice per time point. Dots represent independent measurements and lines represent the mean. d, Quantification of the number of villi sharing stroma in three mice per indicated time point (E16.5 n = 233, P0 n = 412, P5 n = 406, P11 n = 412, adult n = 129 villi were counted). Dots represent the percentage of villi sharing stroma in each independent mouse and the line represents the mean. e, Detection of E-cadherin (red) and PDGFRA (yellow) in whole mounts indicating villi with sharing stroma (arrowhead). Samples from three mice were analysed per time point and representative images are shown. Scale bars, 100 μm. f, Detection of E-cadherin (magenta) and GFP (Lgr5-DTR-eGFP) in E16.5 intestinal whole mount. Boxed area (1) indicates a villus undergoing fission, which is shown at higher magnification (middle). Transverse sections (2 and 3) illustrating villi surrounded by LGR5-expressing cells (2) and villus with shared mesenchyme (3). The arrowhead indicates that pockets formed in a fissioning villus are LGR5-negative, the dashed line outlines the epithelium. Samples from three mice were analysed and a representative image is shown. g, Detection of EdU incorporation (green) in the epithelium (E-cadherin, red) following a 1-h chase in E16.5 intestinal whole mounts. Arrowheads indicate proliferative cells at the edge of putative villi undergoing fission. These are detected in 11 out of 16 structures. Representative pictures from three mice analysed are shown. Scale bars, 50 μm. h, Quantification of EdU intensity in the fissioning areas compared to the surrounding villi at the same height quantified as depicted in the cartoon on the basis of thresholded intensity in the demarcated boxes. n = 16 independent villi sharing stroma were quantified. Box plots show the median, box edges represent the first and third quartiles, and the whiskers extend to minimum and maximum values. Dots represent fluorescent ratio of the independent villi sharing stroma. Paired t-test. i, Height of the proliferative fissioning areas compared to the surrounding intervillus regions were quantified as depicted in the cartoon. n = 11 independent villi sharing stroma were quantified. j, Images showing the start and end points from live imaging of villi undergoing fission (Supplementary Video 6). Image from mT/mG;Villin-cre mice, where the epithelium is shown Green (mG) and remaining cells in red (mT). A representative fission event from five analysed mice is shown. Scale bar, 50 μm.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Outline of the model and typical outputs from simulations.
a, Schematics of the model for the renewal of intervillus LGR5+ cells. On the basis of proliferation data, we assume that the classical model of symmetrically dividing and competing LGR5+ cells holds embryonically, with a division rate once a day. The ‘losing’ cell is expelled into the transit-amplifying (TA) compartment, displacing all cells above it by one position. b, Schematics of the model for the dynamics of differentiated cells on the villus. The model dynamics are separated into two phases. The first phase occurs from E16.5 to P5: LGR5+ cells are the only proliferative cells, and villi fission occurs as a stochastic event, resulting in the duplication of a villus subregion into a whole new intervillus–villus grid, and a resulting shift of cells along the existing villus. A second phase occurs after P5: the dynamics are similar to adulthood, with rapidly dividing transit-amplifying cells (occupying 1/5th of the villus at the bottom) and cell loss at the top. Proliferation of transit-amplifying cells is again exclusively along the top–bottom axis, resulting in unidirectional displacement of all cells above the dividing cell. c, Three snapshots from a numerical simulation of the epithelium as a growing elastic sheet on a growing elastic medium. The growth is assumed to be quasi-static, so that the epithelium maintains a deformation at a given wavelength, minimizing the elastic energy of the sheet and substrate. Where the system grows (top to bottom panels), this results in de novo villi formation from local deformations of the epithelial sheet, resulting in villus and intervillus regions shifting places via tissue bending (the dashed lines serve as a guide to represent how a cell in a given position x can change height z). d, e, Two sets of snapshots from two numerical simulations of an E16.5 LGR5 tracing, according to the rules outlined in a, b. Each black box represents an intervillus–villus grid, with the number increasing in time owing to random villi fission. Red squares indicate the labelled cells at E16.5 (initially in the bottom-most layer of LGR5+ cells). An example of a clone that becomes lost in time, despite having participated in villi fission between E18.5 and P1 is shown in d. An example of a clone that becomes fixed within one of the villi having formed de novo during the simulation (while the labelled cell in the original intervillus–villus region of induction was shifted away from the intervillus by a villi fission event between E16.5 and E17.5) is shown in e.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Clone size distributions based on simulation using the cell-repositioning model.
a, Total number of intestinal villi over time (purple, same as Extended Data Fig. 4a) normalized against the fitted trend for the villi formation rate (green line), which we use in the numerical simulations. Samples from three mice were analysed per time point. Data are mean ± s.e.m. b, Cumulative distribution of clone sizes (induced at E16.5) at P0 in the LGR5 (red) compared to the KRT19 (blue) tracing (also depicted in Fig. 2d). c, Cumulative distribution of clone sizes (induced at E16.5) at P5 in the LGR5 (red) compared to the KRT19 (blue) tracing also depicted in Fig. 2d. d, Comparison between experimental (dots) and theoretical cumulative distribution of LGR5 clone sizes (induced at E16.5) at P0 (purple), P5 (red) and P11 (cyan). e, Comparison between experimental (dots) and theoretical cumulative distribution of KRT19 clone sizes (induced at E16.5) at P0 (purple), P5 (red) and P11 (cyan). For all panels, clone size was inferred from clonal volume (Supplementary Table 2), using average single-cell measurements of volume as a conversion factor.
Extended Data Fig. 7 Theoretical controls and sensitivity analysis.
a–c, Comparison between experimental data (dots and error bars) and theoretical predictions (thick lines) for the time evolution of the clonal rootedness (a), average clone size (b) and clonal persistence (c), for both KRT19 (cyan) and the LGR5 (green) tracings from E16.5. Here, the theoretical prediction corresponds to the case of villi fission, following exactly the same model in Extended Data Fig. 6, but stopping at P1 instead of at P5. This shows that fetal fission is enough to explain the bulk of the equipotency between LGR5 and KRT19 clones. d–f, Comparison between experimental data (dots and error bars) and theoretical predictions (thick lines) for the time evolution of the clonal rootedness (d), average clone size (e) and clonal persistence (f), for both KRT19 (cyan) and LGR5 (green) tracings from E16.5. Here, the theoretical prediction corresponds to the case of no new villi formation occurring, showing a very poor fit for the clonal persistence and size to the data. g–i, Comparison between experimental data (dots and error bars) and theoretical predictions (thick lines) for the time evolution of the clonal rootedness (g), average clone size (h) and clonal persistence (i), for both KRT19 (cyan) and LGR5 (green) tracings from E16.5. Here, the theoretical prediction corresponds to the case of villi fission occurring as in the model shown in Fig. 3, but without a shift of cells upon villi fission (see schematics in Extended Data Fig. 5), showing a very poor fit for the clonal persistence to the data. j, Cartoon illustrating that the current villification model suggests that villi emerge from the intervillus region. k–m, Comparison between experimental data (dots and error bars) and theoretical predictions (thick lines) for the time evolution of the clonal rootedness (k), average clone size (l) and clonal persistence (m), for both KRT19 (cyan) and LGR5 (green) tracings from E16.5. Here, the theoretical prediction corresponds to the case of villi formation occurring only from existing crypts, showing a very poor fit for the clonal persistence to the data. n, Volume of single villus cells and intervillus–crypts cells. Total E-cadherin volume of villi and intervilli–crypts, subsequently divided by the number of DAPI+ nuclei to estimate single-cell volume. E16.5 villi n = 8, E16.5 intervilli n = 10, P0 villi n = 6, P0 intervilli n = 3, P5 villi n = 11, P5 intervilli n = 4, P11 villi n = 4, P11 intervilli n = 4, adult villi n = 7, adult intervilli n = 4 independent images were analysed. o, Sensitivity analysis on the influence of differential LGR5− and LGR5+ cellular volume on the model prediction—considering either that all cells have the same volume (continuous lines and a–n) or the differential volume measured at E16.5 (see Supplementary Theory Note, dashed lines). For a–i, k–m: P0 n = 3, P5 n = 3, P11 n = 3, adult n = 6 independent samples analysed for LGR5; P0 n = 1, P5 n = 3, P11 n = 6, adult n = 3 independent samples analysed for KRT19. Data are mean ± s.e.m.
Extended Data Fig. 8 Postnatal lineage tracing.
a, Detection of E-cadherin (cyan) and clones (red) induced at P0 either randomly (Krt19-creERT) or in the intervillus region (Lgr5-eGFP-ires-creERT2). Samples from three mice were analysed per time point and representative images are shown. b, Relative volume of clones (projected) induced either randomly (Krt19-creERT) or in the intervillus region (Lgr5-eGFP-ires-creERT2) as assessed by quantitative clonal analysis following induction at P0. Samples from three mice were analysed per time point and dots represent individual samples and lines indicate the mean ± s.e.m. c, Theoretical labelled-cell fraction of the LGR5 clones induced at P0, using the same model dynamics as the E16.5 induction. Expansion of the LGR5 clones is represented by the thick red line, normalized to the Krt19 tracing (blue, indicative of global tissue growth) and to its P5 value. This displays a net twofold increase between P5 and P11, consistent with the results of the experimental P0 tracing.
Extended Data Fig. 9 The contribution of KRT20-expressing cells during development and homeostasis.
a, Detection of keratin 20 (KRT20, magenta), lysozyme1 (LYZ1, red) and GFP (Lgr5-DTR-eGFP) in adult mouse intestine. Tissue is counterstained with DAPI (cyan). Representative image of n = 3 biologically independent samples is shown. b, Detection of E-cadherin (cyan), GFP (green) and RFP (red) in tissue whole mounts from the proximal part of the small intestine isolated from Rosa26-lsl-Confetti;Krt20-T2A-creERT2 mice at 3 and 40 days after label induction with 4-hydroxytamoxifen. Samples from three mice were analysed per time point and representative images are shown. c, In situ hybridization of Lgr5 (green) and cre (red) in proximal E16.5 small intestine. Tissue is counterstained with DAPI (cyan). Samples from three mice were analysed per time point and representative images are shown. d, Detection of E-cadherin (cyan) and tdTomato (red) in tissue whole mounts from the proximal small intestine isolated from Rosa26-lsl-tdTomato;Krt20-T2A-creERT2 mice at E18.5 and adulthood following administration of 4-hydroxytamoxifen at E16.5. Representative images of n = 2 samples are shown.
Extended Data Fig. 10 Testing intestinal epithelial cells for equipotency.
a, Detection of LGR5–eGFP (green) and CD44 (red) in the E16.5 small intestine isolated from Lgr5-eGFP-ires-creERT2 E16.5 mice. Tissue was counterstained with DAPI (blue). Samples from three mice were analysed and a representative image is shown. Scale bars, 50 μm. b, Cartoon showing the positions used to quantify the pattern of CD44 and LGR5 expression. Quantification of the localization of CD44 and LGR5 positive cells. A total of 14 intervillus regions (x axis) were quantified up to position ±10 (y axis). c, d, Representative FACS dot plot illustrating the gating strategy used to quantify CD44. Dots represent the quantification in individual mice (n = 4). e, Spheroids forming from cells isolated based on DAPI−EpCAM+LGR5–eGFP− and DAPI−EpCAM+LGR5–eGFP− from the proximal half of the small intestine from mice at E16.5. Representative images of n = 3 biologically independent samples. f, Quantification of spheroid seeding efficiency following isolation based on either CD44 or LGR5 (n = 3 mice per condition). g–i, Gating strategy for purification of villus and intervillus cells for transplantation. The gating hierarchy of the panels is numbered i–vi (g), an example of purity is indicated (h) and an mT/mG-derived organoid is shown (i). Spheroids were generated from a pool of n = 6 biologically independent samples. j, k, Outline for transplantation experiment. In brief, experimental colitis was induced in RAG2−/− mice by administration of DSS in the drinking water. Organoids from the different cultures were subsequently infused into lumen of the mice (j) and engrafted regions were immunostained for lineage and stem-cell markers (k). l, Scheme summarizing the main findings of this work.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
This file contains the Supplementary Theory Note, Supplementary References, Supporting Clonal Data and Supplementary Tables 1-2.
Supplementary Data
This zipped file contains the biophysical modeling code and an example to reproduce the model-data comparison.
Video 1: related to Extended Figure 1b.
Video showing a 3D reconstruction of RFP and GFP in Lgr5-eGFP-ires-CreERT2;Rosa26-lsl-Confetti at P11, pregnant mouse was treated with 4-Hydroxytamoxifen at E16.5. Representative video of n=3 biologically independent samples analyzed.
Video 2: related to Extended Figure 3g.
Video showing a 3D reconstruction of RFP and GFP in Krt19-CreERT/mT/mG P0 newborns, treated with 4-Hydroxytamoxifen at E16.5. A representative video of n=3 biologically independent samples is shown.
Video 3: related to Figure 3a.
Video showing a 3D reconstruction of E-Cadherin and PDGFRA stained E16.5 fetal intestine. A representative video of n=3 biologically independent samples is shown.
Video 4: related to Figure 3a.
Video showing a transversal section of 3D reconstruction of E-Cadherin and PDGFRA stained E16.5 fetal intestine to illustrate an example of villi with shared stroma. A representative video of n=3 biologically independent samples is shown.
Video 5: related to Figure 3b.
Video showing a transversal section of 3D reconstruction of E-Cadherin, PDGFRA and EdU (1 hour after EdU injection) stained E16.5 fetal intestine to illustrate proliferative cells villi with shared stroma. A representative video of n=3 biologically independent samples is shown.
Video 6: related to Extended Figure 4j.
Video showing a villus fission event VillinCre;mT:mG intestine. A fission event of n=5 independent biological samples is shown.
Video 7: related to Figure 3d.
Video showing a villus fission event in a bright field. A fission event of n=3 independent biological samples is shown.
Source data
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guiu, J., Hannezo, E., Yui, S. et al. Tracing the origin of adult intestinal stem cells. Nature 570, 107–111 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1212-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1212-5
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Mechanisms of metastatic colorectal cancer
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology (2024)
-
LSD1 drives intestinal epithelial maturation and controls small intestinal immune cell composition independent of microbiota in a murine model
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Mechanical state transitions in the regulation of tissue form and function
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (2024)
-
Mechanically enhanced biogenesis of gut spheroids with instability-driven morphomechanics
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Cell competition in development, homeostasis and cancer
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (2023)