Abstract
Materials research has driven the development of modern nano-electronic devices. In particular, research in magnetic thin films has revolutionized the development of spintronic devices1,2 because identifying new magnetic materials is key to better device performance and design. Van der Waals crystals retain their chemical stability and structural integrity down to the monolayer and, being atomically thin, are readily tuned by various kinds of gate modulation3,4. Recent experiments have demonstrated that it is possible to obtain two-dimensional ferromagnetic order in insulating Cr2Ge2Te6 (ref. 5) and CrI3 (ref. 6) at low temperatures. Here we develop a device fabrication technique and isolate monolayers from the layered metallic magnet Fe3GeTe2 to study magnetotransport. We find that the itinerant ferromagnetism persists in Fe3GeTe2 down to the monolayer with an out-of-plane magnetocrystalline anisotropy. The ferromagnetic transition temperature, Tc, is suppressed relative to the bulk Tc of 205 kelvin in pristine Fe3GeTe2 thin flakes. An ionic gate, however, raises Tc to room temperature, much higher than the bulk Tc. The gate-tunable room-temperature ferromagnetism in two-dimensional Fe3GeTe2 opens up opportunities for potential voltage-controlled magnetoelectronics7,8,9,10,11 based on atomically thin van der Waals crystals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Atomically thin, layered van der Waals crystals represent ideal two-dimensional (2D) material systems with exceptional electronic structures. Vast opportunities in 2D material research arise from (1) emerging physical properties as a result of reduced dimensionality, and (2) new gating capabilities to modulate the material properties now that the entire crystal is a surface. The former underpins the rapid permeation of 2D materials in areas ranging from semiconductors to highly correlated materials and superconductors. The trend continues with the recent addition of magnetic crystals in the 2D material family5,6. In particular, ferromagnetic order has been observed in monolayer CrI3 in the form of a 2D Ising ferromagnet6. The intrinsic ferromagnetism in these 2D materials is unlike the ferromagnetism in conventional, molecular-beam-epitaxy-grown ultrathin metals12,13, which is determined by the interface with the substrate. This suggests device concepts based on magnetic van der Waals heterostructures14,15,16.
Here we report the discovery of 2D itinerant ferromagnetism in atomically thin Fe3GeTe2 (FGT). As in the case of CrI3, intrinsic magnetocrystalline anisotropy in FGT monolayers counteracts thermal fluctuations and preserves the 2D long-range ferromagnetic order, which is otherwise precluded in an isotropic magnetic system according to the Mermin–Wagner theorem17. FGT, however, offers a critical advantage: its metallic nature enables the interplay of both spin and charge degrees of freedom that lies at the heart of various spintronic architectures18. In this study we focus on the large anomalous Hall effect resulting from such interplay. The anomalous Hall effect enables us to extract the ferromagnetic transition temperature Tc, and elucidate the evolution of the magnetic order from bulk down to monolayer FGT. Taking advantage of the tunability of atomically thin crystals, we further show that extreme doping induced by an ionic gate dramatically elevates Tc to room temperature, accompanied by large modulations in the coercivity. These results establish FGT as a room-temperature ferromagnetic 2D material in addition to VSe2 (ref. 19), and the gate tunability makes FGT potentially suitable for electrically controlled magnetoelectronic devices.
Various metallic layered compounds exhibit magnetism20. Among them FGT stands out with a relatively high Tc (ranging from 150 K to 220 K depending on Fe occupancy21,22,23,24). In each FGT monolayer, covalently bonded Fe3Ge heterometallic slab is sandwiched between two Te layers (Fig. 1b). The structure and valence states of the compound can be written as (Te2−)(FeI3+)[(FeII2+)(Ge4−)](FeI3+)(Te2−) per formula unit with two inequivalent Fe sites, FeI3+ and FeII2+, within the Fe3Ge slab22. Partially filled Fe d orbitals dominate the band structure around the Fermi level, and give rise to itinerant ferromagnetism in bulk FGT25. Adjacent monolayers are separated by a 2.95 Å van der Waals gap in the bulk crystal. As a result of the reduced crystal symmetry of the layered structure, bulk FGT exhibits a strong magnetocrystalline anisotropy25. Such anisotropy is expected to stabilize the long-range ferromagnetic order in FGT monolayers.
Experimentally isolating atomically thin FGT crystals from the bulk, however, poses a challenge. Although bulk FGT cleaves along the van der Waals gap, the intralayer bonding is not strong enough for thin flakes of reasonable size (about 5 μm) to survive conventional mechanical exfoliation processes. Similar issues plague the exfoliation of many other layered materials (only a small fraction of known layered crystals is cleavable down to monolayers), and have largely impeded the research on 2D materials in general.
To address this problem, we developed an Al2O3-assisted exfoliation method that enables isolation of monolayers from bulk layered crystals that are otherwise difficult to exfoliate using conventional methods. Our method was inspired by the gold-mediated exfoliation of layered transition-metal chalcogenide compounds26,27. The fabrication process is illustrated step by step in Fig. 1a. We started by covering the freshly cleaved surface of the bulk crystal with Al2O3 thin film with thicknesses ranging from 50 nm to 200 nm. The film was deposited by thermally evaporating Al under an oxygen partial pressure of 10−4 mbar. We then used a thermal release tape to pick up the Al2O3 film, along with pieces of FGT microcrystals separated from the bulk. The Al2O3/FGT stack was subsequently released onto a piece of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) upon heating, with the FGT side in contact with the PDMS surface. Next, we stamped the PDMS/FGT/Al2O3 assembly onto a substrate and quickly peeled away the PDMS, leaving the Al2O3 film covered with freshly cleaved FGT flakes on the substrate. Figure 1c displays an optical image of atomically thin FGT flakes on Al2O3 film supported on a 285-nm SiO2/Si substrate. Mono- to trilayer regions of FGT are clearly resolved by the optical contrast. The layer identification was corroborated by direct topography measurements with an atomic force microscope; the 0.8-nm steps in the height profile exactly match the FGT monolayer thickness (Fig. 1d, e). We then fabricated electrodes on FGT thin flakes, either with direct metal deposition through stencil masks or with indium cold welding, for subsequent transport measurements. The entire device fabrication process was performed in an argon atmosphere with O2 and H2O content kept below 0.5 parts per million to avoid sample degradation. Details of the sample exfoliation and electrode fabrication are presented in the Methods. Finally, we point out that even though we focus only on FGT in this study, the method should be applicable to a wide variety of van der Waals crystals. We attribute the drastically enhanced exfoliation capability to higher affinity, as well as increased contact area, between the evaporated Al2O3 film and the freshly cleaved FGT surface.
We study the magnetism in FGT by probing the Hall resistance, Rxy, under an external magnetic field, μ0H, applied perpendicular to the van der Waals plane. In our samples, which typically have a van der Pauw configuration, the fact that Rxy is antisymmetric with respect to the polarity of μ0H, whereas magnetoresistance is symmetric, enables us to use a standard symmetrization procedure28 to separate the contribution of magnetoresistance from the raw Hall voltage data. For a magnetic material, Rxy can be decomposed into two parts:
where \({R}_{{\rm{NH}}}={R}_{0}{\mu }_{0}H\) is the normal Hall resistance, and \({R}_{{\rm{AH}}}={R}_{{\rm{S}}}M\) the anomalous Hall resistance; R0 and RS are coefficients characterizing the strength of RNH and RAH, respectively, and M is the magnetization. Crucial information on the long-range magnetic order, which is contained in M, can therefore be extracted from the anomalous Hall resistance.
As the layer number is reduced in FGT flakes, the samples become progressively more insulating (Fig. 1f), but ferromagnetism persists down to the monolayer. Unambiguous evidence comes from the clear hysteresis in Rxy for all FGT thin flakes (with thickness ranging from monolayer to 50 layers; Fig. 2a) under investigation at low temperatures. Such hysteresis reflects the hysteresis in M; the remanent M at μ0H = 0 signifies spontaneous magnetization, and thus the long-range ferromagnetic order. Raising the temperature introduces thermal fluctuations, and ferromagnetism eventually disappears above Tc. In Fig. 2b, measurements of Rxy show that ferromagnetism in samples with various layer numbers responds differently to thermal fluctuations: at an elevated temperature of T = 100 K hysteresis vanishes in mono- and bilayer samples, but survives in thicker crystals. The observation clearly indicates a strong dimensionality effect on ferromagnetism in atomically thin FGT.
To fully elucidate such a dimensionality effect, we precisely determine Tc as a function of layer number from the temperature dependence of the anomalous Hall effect. For each sample thickness, we examine the remanent Hall resistance at zero external magnetic field, \({R}_{xy}^{{\rm{r}}}\equiv {R}_{{xy}}{| }_{{\mu }_{0}H=0}\) , as a function of temperature. According to equation (1), \({R}_{xy}^{{\rm{r}}}\) is directly proportional to the zero-field spontaneous magnetization \(M{| }_{{\mu }_{0}H=0}\). So the onset of non-zero \({R}_{xy}^{{\rm{r}}}\) indicates the emergence of spontaneous magnetization. The temperature at the onset of non-zero \({R}_{xy}^{{\rm{r}}}\) therefore marks Tc (Fig. 2c)28. Analyses of various sample thicknesses reveals that Tc decreases monotonically as the samples are thinned down, from about 180 K in the bulk limit to 20 K in a monolayer (Fig. 2d). The one-order-of-magnitude decrease in Tc implies a dramatic reduction in the energy scale of magnetic ordering in 2D FGT. Meanwhile, we also used polar refractive magnetic circular dichroism (RMCD) microscopy to measure layer-dependent Tc (Fig. 2d). We found that Tc values from RMCD measurements are consistently higher than those from anomalous Hall effect measurements. Because the anomalous Hall effect probes ferromagnetic ordering in the whole sample (with a typical size of about 100 μm) and RMCD detects local ordering (with a laser beam spot of about 2 μm), the large discrepancy signifies the existence of domains well above the Tc from measurements of the anomalous Hall effect. Analysis of Arrott plots (see Methods for details) provides further insights into the domain structure. The plots determine Tc by extrapolating high-field data, where domains are fully aligned. Tc values from Arrott plots agree well with those from RMCD measurements, which implies that the domain size is of the same order of the beam spot size in our RMCD measurements, that is, about 2 μm.
The strong dimensionality effect on the ferromagnetism in FGT stems from the fundamental role of thermal fluctuation in 2D. The itinerant ferromagnetism in FGT is, in principle, described by the Stoner model22,25. It has, however, been established that such itinerant ferromagnetism can be mapped on to a classical Heisenberg model with Ruderman–Kittel–Kasuya–Yosida (RKKY) exchange29. Armed with this insight, we adopt the following anisotropic Heisenberg Hamiltonian:
where \({{\boldsymbol{S}}}_{i}\) is the spin operator on site i, and Jij is the exchange coupling between spins on site i and j; A is the single-ion perpendicular magnetocrystalline anisotropy arising from spin–orbital coupling. In the three-dimensional (3D) limit, the density of states per spin for the magnon modes is strongly suppressed, so thermal fluctuations destroy the long-range magnetic order only at a finite Tc determined primarily by exchange interactions Jij (ref. 5). The bulk Tc of approximately 200 K implies that the energy scale of Jij (summed over nearest neighbours) in FGT is of the order of 10 meV. In monolayer FGT, however, the largely isotropic exchange couplings Jij (see Methods for detailed ab initio calculations) alone will not be able to sustain magnetic order at finite temperatures because of thermal fluctuations of the long-wavelength gapless magnon modes in 2D. In this case, the magnetocrystalline anisotropy A gives rise to an energy gap in the magnon dispersion. The gap suppresses low-frequency, long-wavelength magnon excitations, and protects the magnetic order below a finite Tc determined primarily by A. A monolayer Tc up to 68 K (from RMCD measurement) implies an A value of the order of 2.0 meV. The estimations of both exchange interactions and magnetocrystalline anisotropy fall in the range predicted by ab initio calculations25,30 (see also Methods). The magnetocrystalline anisotropy corresponds to a uniaxial energy density parameter Ku on the order of 106 J m−3. The estimated Ku is consistent with the value measured in bulk FGT31, and is one order of magnitude larger than the perpendicular anisotropy energy density in a 1.3-nm-thick CoFeB film32. The large intrinsic perpendicular anisotropy will be important to enable the realization of stable, compact spintronic devices.
Even though Tc is suppressed in atomically thin FGT, we now demonstrate that an ionic gate could drastically modulate the ferromagnetism in FGT thin flakes, and boost Tc up to room temperature. We employ an ionic field-effect transistor setup, in which solid electrolyte (LiClO4 dissolved in polyethylene oxide matrix) covers both the FGT thin flake and a side gate4 (inset to Fig. 3a). A positive gate voltage, Vg, intercalates lithium ions into the FGT thin flake, much like the charging process in a lithium-ion battery. The charge transfer between lithium ions and the host crystal induces electron doping up to the order of 1014 cm−2 per layer4. The high doping level effects a profound change in the ferromagnetism in the FGT thin flake. Figure 3b, c displays the Rxy of a trilayer sample obtained at T = 10 K and T = 240 K, respectively. A moderate Vg of a few volts induces large variations in the coercivity of the ferromagnetic FGT, and the ferromagnetism, manifested as a finite \({R}_{xy}^{{\rm{r}}}\), persists at high temperatures under certain gate doping. Indeed, detailed analysis reveals that Tc is strongly modulated by the ionic gate, with the highest Tc reaching room temperature (T = 300 K; Fig. 3d). The gate-induced room-temperature ferromagnetism is also directly observed in a four-layer sample as shown in Fig. 4. (The room-temperature remanence is low, but this may be improved by, for example, interfacing the sample with an antiferromagnetic insulator.) Tc as a function of the gate voltage exhibits a complex pattern: after an initial drop, Tc increases sharply to room temperature at Vg = 1.75 V. Tc peaks again at Vg = 2.39 V on top of an otherwise slowly declining trend as the doping level increases (Fig. 3d; see Methods for details). The variation in Tc is accompanied by changes in the sample conductance, σxx, obtained at T = 330 K (Fig. 3a). In particular, the two peaks in Tc coincide with sudden increases in σxx, suggesting changes in the electronic structure as the origin of the magnetism modulation. Finally, we note that the coercivity measured at T = 10 K also roughly follows the variations in Tc, as shown in Fig. 3e.
The gate-tuned ferromagnetism in atomically thin FGT is consistent with the Stoner model, which describes itinerant magnetic systems. The Stoner criterion implies that the formation of ferromagnetic order is dictated by the density of states (DOS) at the Fermi level. The extreme electron doping induced by the ionic gate causes a substantial shift of the electronic bands of FGT. Consequently, the large variation in the DOS at the Fermi level leads to appreciable modulation in the ferromagnetism. Detailed calculations support such a picture. Specifically, our calculation shows that gate-induced electrons sequentially fill the sub-bands originating from the Fe \({d}_{{z}^{2}}\), \({d}_{xz}\) and \({d}_{yz}\) orbitals, leading to sharp peaks in the DOS that correspond to the Fermi level passing through the flat band edges of the sub-bands (see Methods and Extended Data Fig. 10a). Such DOS peaks may be responsible for the sharp increase of Tc and the corresponding sudden jump in σxx. Meanwhile, calculations indicate that change in the average magnet moment per Fe atom is minimal (less than 3%) under charge doping (see Methods and Extended Data Fig. 10b). This result suggests that the gate-tuned coercivity shown in Fig. 3e may in fact reflect the large modulation in the anisotropy energy, although we cannot rule out effects from domain nucleation that complicates the correlation between coercivity and anisotropy.
Methods
Growth and characterization of bulk FGT crystal
High-quality FGT single crystals were grown by the chemical vapour transport method. High-purity elements were stoichiometrically mixed and sealed under vacuum in a quartz tube with a small quantity of iodine (5 mg cm−3). The tube was placed into a two-zone horizontal furnace with the hot end at 750 °C and the cold end at 650 °C. Shining plate-like single crystals with typical dimensions of 3 mm × 3 mm × 0.25 mm were then obtained. The phase purity of the sample was examined by a powder X-ray diffractometer (SmartLab-9, Rigaku Corp.) with Cu Kα radiation, and result is shown in Extended Data Fig. 1a. The magnetization was measured by a SQUID magnetometer (Quantum Design MPMS-5), and the result is shown in Extended Data Fig. 1b.
Fabrication of FGT thin-flake devices
We used two kinds of substrates for FGT exfoliation: 285-nm SiO2/Si wafer and sapphire. For thin flakes on 285-nm SiO2/Si wafers (Fig. 1c), we determined the layer number of the flakes with an atomic force microscope, and correlated the topography image with optical contrast. Here the optical contrast is defined as \(\left({G}_{{\rm{sample}}}^{{\rm{R}}}-{G}_{{\rm{substrate}}}^{{\rm{R}}}\right)/{G}_{{\rm{substrate}}}^{{\rm{R}}}\), where \({G}_{{\rm{sample}}}^{{\rm{R}}}\) and \({G}_{{\rm{substrate}}}^{{\rm{R}}}\) are intensity of the reflection (R) on sample and substrate, respectively, in the green channel of the optical image captured with a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera. Excellent correlation between the height profile and the optical contrast has enabled us to determine unambiguously the layer number of exfoliated thin flakes. However, because optical contrast in the reflection is very sensitive to the thickness of the Al2O3 film as a result of optical interference, the optical contrast needs to be calibrated with atomic force microscopy measurement individually for every batch of samples. Such calibration processes usually take a long time. For this reason, we also used sapphire substrates, and determined the layer numbers by optical transmission, which is not sensitive to the Al2O3 film thickness. The optical transmission is now defined as \({G}_{{\rm{sample}}}^{{\rm{T}}}/{G}_{{\rm{substrate}}}^{{\rm{T}}}\), where \({G}_{{\rm{sample}}}^{{\rm{T}}}\) and \({G}_{{\rm{substrate}}}^{{\rm{T}}}\) are the intensities of the transmission (T) through the sample and substrate, respectively, in the green channel of the image captured with a CCD camera. Extended Data Fig. 2a–c illustrates the layer number determination on sapphire substrate. The layer-number-dependent optical transmission is well described by the Beer–Lambert law (Extended Data Fig. 2c), which enables us to determine the layer number quickly and reliably.
We employed two methods to fabricate electrical contacts to FGT thin flakes: (1) direct metal deposition through stencil mask and (2) indium cold welding. We find that direct metal deposition works well for samples with thicknesses larger than two layers, but it tends to degrade the sample quality for thinner samples. We therefore used the cold welding method to fabricate indium microelectrodes on the thinnest flakes. Indium thin foil was first cut into small stripes. A PDMS stamp was then used to hold these stripes, with which we align the FGT thin flake under an optical microscope. We then pressed the indium stripes onto the sample to form electrical contacts, before lifting off the PDMS stamp. The cold welding method works well for FGT thin flakes as small as 20 μm. Extended Data Fig. 2f displays a monolayer device with microelectrodes made by cold welding. A trilayer device made by direct metal deposition is shown in Extended Data Fig. 2i for comparison.
Determining T c by Arrott plots and polar RMCD microscopy
In the main text, the Tc values for FGT thin-flake devices were obtained from the temperature-dependent anomalous Hall effect. Here we use Arrott plots34 to independently determine Tc. Following a previously described method35, we replot the Hall data (such as those shown in Extended Data Fig. 3a–c) in plots of \({R}_{xy}^{2}\) as a function of \({\mu }_{0}H/{R}_{xy}\), that is, Arrott plots. Extrapolation of the high-field linear part of the Arrott plots intercepts the \({R}_{xy}^{2}\) axis at values denoted as \({\left({R}_{xy}^{{\rm{s}}}\right)}^{2}\), where \({R}_{xy}^{{\rm{s}}}\) refers to spontaneous Hall resistance. Positive intercepts indicate a ferromagnetic state, and Tc is the temperature where \({R}_{xy}^{{\rm{s}}}\) vanishes35. As an example, we show the Arrott plots of a bilayer FGT sample in Extended Data Fig. 3d. The Tc values of the bilayer and other thin-flake samples are determined from points where \({R}_{xy}^{{\rm{s}}}\) as a function of T approaches zero (Extended Data Fig. 3e), and the results are summarized in Fig. 2d. We note that Tc values for monolayer samples cannot be extracted from Arrott plots, because the samples are very insulating, and the large normal Hall contribution in Rxy prevents a reliable determination of Tc.
We also used RMCD microscopy to determine the Tc of FGT thin flakes. The same fabrication technique as shown in Fig. 1a was used to make thin-flake samples for the RMCD measurements. At each fixed temperature, we recorded the RMCD signal on each uniform region of the few-layer sample shown in Extended Data Fig. 4a as the magnetic field was swept. (We used a 633 nm HeNe laser with a spot size of about 2 μm to obtain the RMCD signal.) The data are displayed in Extended Data Fig. 4b–e. Clear hysteresis loops in RMCD signal are observed at low temperatures. We extracted the remanent RMCD signal at μ0H = 0 from each dataset in Extended Data Fig. 4b–e, and plotted the results in Extended Data Fig. 4f. The Tc of FGT flakes with varying number of layers is determined by the temperature where the remanent RMCD signal vanishes.
Figure 2d summarizes the Tc obtained from anomalous Hall measurements, Arrott plot analysis and RMCD measurements. Although the Tc from Arrott plot analysis and RMCD measurements agree with each other, they are consistently higher than that determined from anomalous Hall effect measurements. The discrepancy is as large as about 50 K in few-layer FGT. As discussed in the main text, the large discrepancy signifies the existence of micrometre-sized domains above the Tc obtained from anomalous Hall effect measurements. We note that a similar thickness-dependent domain effect was also observed in the charge density wave ordering in 1T-TaS2 thin flakes. The charge density wave phase transition was observed in optical36 and transmission electron microscopy measurements37, but not detected in transport measurement37.
Scaling analysis of layer-dependent T c in FGT thin flakes
The evolution from 3D to 2D magnetism in FGT is linked with the critical behaviour at the paramagnet to ferromagnet phase transition. Because Tc is the critical temperature where spin-spin correlation length diverges, a finite sample thickness limits the divergence of the correlation length, and therefore depresses Tc. Analyses of the critical behaviour in large area magnetic thin films38,39,40 show that layer-number-dependent Tc(N) follows a universal scaling law as the sample thickness approaches the 2D limit: \(\left[{T}_{{\rm{c}}}\left(\infty \right)-{T}_{{\rm{c}}}\left(N\right)\right]/{T}_{{\rm{c}}}\left(\infty \right)={\left(\left({N}_{0}+1\right)/2N\right)}^{\lambda }\) , where Tc(∞) denotes Tc of the bulk crystal. The critical exponent \(\lambda =1/\nu \) reflects the universality class of the transition; N0 is the critical layer number defined by the mean spin–spin interaction range. Analyses40,41,42,43 also reveal that the power law is replaced by a linear relation when the film is thinner than the critical value, that is, \(N\le {N}_{0}\). N0, therefore, marks the boundary that separates 2D magnetism and 3D magnetism in ultrathin ferromagnets. The scaling law fits well to the Tc(N) measured in FGT as shown in Extended Data Fig. 5 (here we fitted the highest Tc determined by \({R}_{xy}^{{\rm{r}}}\) for each sample thickness). The fit yields a critical layer number of \({N}_{0}=3.2\pm 0.6\) and a critical exponent of \(\lambda =2.3\pm 0.8\). We also confirmed that the linear relation well describes our data in the thinnest samples (\(N\le 3\); see Extended Data Fig. 5). We note that N0 obtained in FGT is comparable to that in the magnetic thin films12,40,43. Meanwhile, λ is consistent with values expected from mean field model (λ = 2), 3D Ising model (λ = 1.587), or 3D Heisenberg model (λ = 1.414); more accurate determination of Tc is required to resolve the universality class of bulk FGT.
Magnetic anisotropy of atomically thin FGT devices
We investigate the magnetic anisotropy of a four-layer FGT flake with angle-dependent anomalous Hall measurements. When a perpendicular magnetic field is applied (θH = 90°; θH is the tilt angle between the magnetic field and basal plane of the sample), the square hysteresis loop indicates an out-of-plane magnetic anisotropy. A large in-plane field (μ0H > 2.6 T; θH ≈ 0°) forces the magnetization to the in-plane direction; Rxy vanishes because it is proportional only to the out-of-plane component of the magnetization (Extended Data Fig. 6a). As the in-plane magnetic field decreases, however, Rxy acquires a finite value, implying that the magnetization is tilted towards the out-of-plane direction. The fact that the remanent Hall resistance \({R}_{xy}^{{\rm{r}}}\) at θH ≈ 0° does not reach the value at θH = 90° suggests the existence of domains in this four-layer FGT sample.
To eliminate the effect of domains, we analyse the angle-dependent anomalous Hall effect at a high magnetic field of μ0H = 3 T. The high field aligns the domains at all tilt angles (Extended Data Fig. 6a), so the whole sample is effectively a single domain. We extracted the Rxy value at μ0H = 3 T at various tilt angles, and calculated the angle between magnetization and the basal plane, θM, as a function of θH, using the formula:
Extended Data Fig. 6c displays θM as a function of θH. The fact that θM is always larger than θH implies that the magnetization always tends to point to the out-of-plane direction regardless of the direction of the external magnetic field. This result indicates a strong out-of-plane magnetic anisotropy in the four-layer FGT.
The out-of-plane magnetic anisotropy is corroborated by angle-dependent Rxy measurements near Tc. Here we applied external fields at θH = 20° and θH = 90° at 150 K (around 5 K above the Tc determined by anomalous Hall measurements in the same sample). We observed that for magnetic fields tilted to a nearly in-plane direction (θH = 20°), Rxy decreases with the field strength in the high field regime (μ0H > 1 T), in contrast to the upward trend in Rxy as the magnetic field is applied perpendicularly (θH = 90°; Extended Data Fig. 6b). Because the anomalous component of Rxy is proportional only to the out-of-plane magnetization, our observation implies that the magnetization is pinned in the out-of-plane direction at small magnetic fields, and is pulled towards the in-plane direction only in the high field regime.
Finally, we extract an estimation of the magnetic anisotropy energy density by fitting the data shown in Extended Data Fig. 6c with the Stoner–Wohlfarth model44. The total energy of the system is:
where Ku is the magnetic anisotropy energy density, and Ms is the saturation magnetization per volume. At equilibrium:
The above equation determines the relation between θM and θH, which we used to fit the experimental data shown in Extended Data Fig. 6c (solid line). Assuming a value for Ms of about 1.8μB per Fe atom30, we obtained Ku = 5.1 × 105 J m−3 from the fit. Such a magnetic anisotropy energy density is in reasonable agreement with the value obtained in bulk FGT31.
Ionic gating of atomically thin ferromagnetic FGT devices
We determine the Tc of the FGT trilayer under ionic gating (Fig. 3) from anomalous Hall measurements. Specifically, we recorded Rxy as a function of T when the sample is cooled down in the presence of an infinitesimal magnetic field μ0H0 = 0.01 T applied in the out-of-plane direction. Because the normal part of the Hall resistance is negligible at such a low field, the anomalous Hall resistance is obtained as \({R}_{{\rm{AH}}}{| }_{{\mu }_{0}{H}_{0}}=\left({R}_{{xy}}{| }_{{\mu }_{0}{H}_{0}}-{R}_{{xy}}{| }_{-{\mu }_{0}{H}_{0}}\right)/2\). (The symmetrization procedure28 is required to remove the Rxx component in the Hall data.) We extracted Tc by extrapolating RAH to 0 (black lines, Extended Data Fig. 7a). The extrapolation is necessary because some of the Tc values are far above the freezing temperature of lithium ions (about 240 K).
The normal Hall resistance RNH proportional to the external magnetic field manifests as a linear background in Rxy at high fields where the anomalous Hall resistance saturates. We were therefore able to obtain the Hall coefficient RH as the slope of the line fits to the high-field part of Rxy(μ0H) shown in Fig. 3c. Extended Data Fig. 7d displays such line fits at three representative gate voltages, and the inverse of eRH is plotted as a function of Vg in Extended Data Fig. 7e (here e is the charge on the electron). We observe that the inverse of eRH as a function of Vg follows exactly the behaviour of Tc (Extended Data Fig. 7c). Because RH is determined by the electronic structure on the Fermi surface45, our observation unambiguously links the gate-induced magnetic response to changes in the Fermi surface, and provides additional support for the Stoner model discussed in the main text. Finally, we caution that here one cannot directly extract the carrier density from the inverse of eRH as in the case of semiconductors. The Fermi surface of a multiband metal such as FGT is very complex, and the inverse of eRH is in general not related to the carrier density.
We determined that the fundamental mechanism underlying the ionic gating in this study is gate-controlled intercalation of lithium ions. Clear evidence came from the fact that the ionic gate uniformly modulates the trilayer FGT as shown in Fig. 3. Such a large modulation depth is only possible with ion intercalation; electrostatic gating would have been almost completely screened by the first atomic layer, resulting in nonuniform gating in the out-of-plane direction. The thickness dependence of the gate modulation provides additional evidence for intercalation mechanism. The resistances (normalized by the value at Vg = 0 V) of three samples with varying thicknesses under gate modulation are displayed in Extended Data Fig. 8. The fact that a resistive state is induced in all three (initially metallic) samples implies that the gate modulation depth can be as large as 70 layers. This result is unambiguous evidence that ion diffusion, not the electrostatic field, is at work.
The intercalation mechanism is further corroborated by the reversibility of the magnetic response under ionic gating. As shown in Extended Data Fig. 7c, the gate-induced high-Tc state reverts to the initial low-Tc state once the gate voltage is swept back. Such reversibility indicates that the gate-intercalated ions do not chemically react (that is, form chemical bonds) with the crystal, which is consistent with results from gate-controlled intercalation of other layered crystals46,47,48. We note that the reversibility of ionic gating is also confirmed by the measurement of the Hall coefficient RH shown in Extended Data Fig. 7e. The ultrathin specimen did suffer from sample degradation, which resulted in a large background in the sample resistance (Extended Data Fig. 7b) during the down-sweep of the gate. Such degradation was expected because ultrathin FGT was shown to be sensitive to the trace amounts of O2 and H2O present during gating.
First-principles calculations of electronic and magnetic properties of bulk FGT
First-principles calculations were carried out based on density functional theory (DFT)49,50 as implemented in VASP code51 with a plane wave basis set52,53. Spin-polarized Perdew–Burke–Enzerhof generalized gradient approximation (GGA)54 and local density approximation (LDA)55 were used as the exchange-correlation functionals. We also tested the on-site Coulomb interaction with different effective Hubbard U. The correction of van der Waals interactions, namely the DFT-D3 method with Becke–Jonson damping56,57, was included in all our calculations. The energy cutoff of the plane-wave basis set was set to 400 eV. The bulk crystal lattice constants were obtained by fully relaxing the primitive cell to be stress-free with a 17 × 17 × 4 gamma-centred k-point mesh. The k-point sampling was up to 17 × 17 × 1 and 4 × 4 × 2 for slabs and bulk supercell calculations, respectively. The slabs were separated by a vacuum of at least 15 Å. We performed careful convergence tests for all of the settings aforementioned. The LDA functional yields a magnetic moment of 1.424μB per Fe site, which agrees with experimental observations22,23,58 (LDA+U, GGA and GGA+U functionals yield magnetic moments of more than 2μB per Fe site). The result is consistent with previous theoretical studies25. We therefore mainly use LDA with spin–orbit coupling to calculate the exchange coupling strength as well as the single-ion anisotropy A.
We adopted the energy mapping method59,60 to obtain the Heisenberg spin exchange constants J from first-principles calculations. Here we used a 3 × 3 ×1 bulk supercell to extract all six-intralayer Jx (or Jy) and four-interlayer Jz. Detailed illustrations of configurations for different J values are shown in Extended Data Fig. 9a and b. Following the algorithm proposed in ref. 59, we calculated the anisotropic spin exchange in a monolayer 3 × 3 ×1 supercell. All the calculation results are summarized in Extended Data Fig. 9c. The intralayer couplings are approximately one order of magnitude larger than the interlayer couplings. Meanwhile, ferromagnetic order is strongly favoured for both in-plane and out-of-plane configurations, owing to the large number of hopping sites that favour ferromagnetic coupling (negative J values).
Next, we investigate the magnetic anisotropy in a monolayer. The exchange parameters for in-plane and out-of-plane are comparable, with the out-of-plane ones slightly larger. The single-ion anisotropy A is defined as the energy difference between all magnetic moments along the easy-axis (the z direction) and along the hard-axis (the x or y direction) in the layer. We found that the single-ion anisotropy A was 1.11 meV per μB for both bulk and monolayer FGT.
Finally, we estimate the effect of electron doping on the Fe magnetic moments. Extended Data Fig. 10a displays the DOS for a trilayer FGT as a function of electron doping level. The average magnetic moment as a function of electron doping is shown in Extended Data Fig. 10b. The results indicate that the amount of electrons doped in our experiment do not much affect the mean magnetic moments on Fe sites.
Mean-field calculation of T c in bulk FGT
Although experiments and LDA calculations show that the magnetism in FGT is itinerant origin, one can still describe the ‘magnetic part’ of the thermodynamic properties of itinerant ferromagnetism with a Heisenberg Hamiltonian with magnetic anisotropy:
where the first term is the sum of the Heisenberg exchange interactions between spin i with spin operator Si and its neighbours Sj, with which it interacts with strength Jij; a negative Jij corresponds to ferromagnetic interactions, and Si is in units of h. The second term is the uniaxial single-ion anisotropy with respect to the uniaxial z axis, where the single-ion anisotropy A < 0 prefers spins aligning along the z axis. The third term is the Zeeman interaction. FeI3+ and FeII2+ have different and non-integer magnetic moments. We, however, treat them equally for simplicity.
We used the molecular mean field theory to solve the above Hamiltonian, which is achieved by replacing the spin operator by its mean value plus fluctuations. Mean-field approximation gives
where the spin flips are completely suppressed. Here B is the magnetic field and g is the Landé g-factor. The eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian \(E\left({S}^{z}\right)\) are labelled by the z components of the spin angular momentum \({S}^{z}\equiv -S,-S+1,\ldots ,S.\) The dimensionless magnetization at temperature T is given by the statistical average over all possible states of Sz
where the partition function is \({Z}_{S}=\sum _{{S}^{z}=-S}^{+S}{{\rm{e}}}^{-{E}_{n}/{k}_{{\rm{B}}}T}\). On the other hand, the magnetization is
Therefore, both sides of equation (8) contain M, which can be solved graphically. Using mean-field approximation, one can see that without the A term in the Hamiltonian of equation (6), the right hand side of equation (8) becomes a Brillouin function. One can further approximate the A term by an effective exchange field as \(\sum _{i}2A\left\langle {S}^{z}\right\rangle {S}_{i}^{z}\). In this case, the Heisenberg model is equivalent to the phenomenological Weiss model of a ferromagnet. The magnetization is
where BS is the Brillouin function defined as
and
The Curie temperature Tc is given by M = 0, which leads to
Here n is the number of neighbouring sites. Taking the effective J parameters from LDA calculations, and choosing S = 5/2 as the magnetic moment of single FeI3+ ion, we can estimate the Tc of bulk FGT to be about 233 K. Meanwhile, choosing S = 2 as the magnetic moment of single FeII2+ ion leads to a bulk Tc value of about 160 K.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Žutić, I., Fabian, J. & Das Sarma, S. Spintronics: fundamentals and applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323–410 (2004).
Hellman, F. et al. Interface-induced phenomena in magnetism. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 025006 (2017).
Ye, J. T. et al. Superconducting dome in a gate-tuned band insulator. Science 338, 1193–1196 (2012).
Yu, Y. et al. Gate-tunable phase transitions in thin flakes of 1T-TaS2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 270–276 (2015).
Gong, C. et al. Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals. Nature 546, 265–269 (2017).
Huang, B. et al. Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit. Nature 546, 270–273 (2017).
Matsukura, F., Tokura, Y. & Ohno, H. Control of magnetism by electric fields. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 209–220 (2015).
Jiang, S., Shan, J. & Mak, K. F. Electric-field switching of two-dimensional van der Waals magnets. Nat. Mater. 17, 406–410 (2018).
Huang, B. et al. Electrical control of 2D magnetism in bilayer CrI3. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 544–548 (2018).
Song, T. et al. Giant tunneling magnetoresistance in spin-filter van der Waals heterostructures. Science 360, 1214–1218 (2018).
Klein, D. R. et al. Probing magnetism in 2D van der Waals crystalline insulators via electron tunneling. Science 360, 1218–1222 (2018).
Huang, F., Kief, M. T., Mankey, G. J. & Willis, R. F. Magnetism in the few-monolayers limit: a surface magneto-optic Kerr-effect study of the magnetic behavior of ultrathin films of Co, Ni, and Co-Ni alloys on Cu(100) and Cu(111). Phys. Rev. B 49, 3962–3971 (1994).
Elmers, H.-J., Hauschild, J. & Gradmann, U. Critical behavior of the uniaxial ferromagnetic monolayer Fe(110) on W(110). Phys. Rev. B 54, 15224–15233 (1996).
Zhao, C. et al. Enhanced valley splitting in monolayer WSe2 due to magnetic exchange field. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 757–762 (2017).
Zhong, D. et al. Van der Waals engineering of ferromagnetic semiconductor heterostructures for spin and valleytronics. Sci. Adv. 3, e1603113 (2017).
Scharf, B., Xu, G., Matos-Abiague, A. & Žutić, I. Magnetic proximity effects in transition-metal dichalcogenides: converting excitons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 127403 (2017).
Mermin, N. D. & Wagner, H. Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133–1136 (1966).
Bhatti, S. et al. Spintronics based random access memory: a review. Mater. Today 20, 530–548 (2017).
Bonilla, M. et al. Strong room-temperature ferromagnetism in VSe2 monolayers on van der Waals substrates. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 289–293 (2018).
Parkin, S. S. P. & Friend, R. H. 3D transition-metal intercalates of the niobium and tantalum dichalcogenides. I. Magnetic properties. Phil. Mag. B 41, 65–93 (1980).
Abrikosov, N. K., Bagaeva, L. A., Dudkin, L. D., Petrova, L. I. & Sokolova, V. M. Phase equilibria in the Fe-Ge-Te system. Inorg. Mater. 21, 1680–1686 (1985).
Deiseroth, H.-J., Aleksandrov, K., Reiner, C., Kienle, L. & Kremer, R. K. Fe3GeTe2 and Ni3GeTe2—two new layered transition-metal compounds: crystal structures, HRTEM investigations, and magnetic and electrical properties. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 1561–1567 (2006).
May, A. F., Calder, S., Cantoni, C., Cao, H. & McGuire, M. A. Magnetic structure and phase stability of the van der Waals bonded ferromagnet Fe3-xGeTe2. Phys. Rev. B 93, 014411 (2016).
Liu, S. et al. Wafer-scale two-dimensional ferromagnetic Fe3GeTe2 thin films grown by molecular beam epitaxy. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 1, 30 (2017).
Zhuang, H. L., Kent, P. R. C. & Hennig, R. G. Strong anisotropy and magnetostriction in the two-dimensional Stoner ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2. Phys. Rev. B 93, 134407 (2016).
Magda, G. Z. et al. Exfoliation of large-area transition metal chalcogenide single layers. Sci. Rep. 5, 14714 (2015).
Desai, S. B. et al. Gold-mediated exfoliation of ultralarge optoelectronically-perfect monolayers. Adv. Mater. 28, 4053–4058 (2016).
Ohno, H., Munekata, H., Penney, T., von Molnár, S. & Chang, L. L. Magnetotransport properties of p-type (In,Mn)As diluted magnetic III–V semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2664–2667 (1992).
Prange, R. E. & Korenman, V. Local-band theory of itinerant ferromagnetism. IV. Equivalent Heisenberg model. Phys. Rev. B 19, 4691–4697 (1979).
Verchenko, V. Y., Tsirlin, A. A., Sobolev, A. V., Presniakov, I. A. & Shevelkov, A. V. Ferromagnetic order, strong magnetocrystalline anisotropy, and magnetocaloric effect in the layered telluride Fe3−δGeTe2. Inorg. Chem. 54, 8598–8607 (2015).
Tan, C. et al. Hard magnetic properties in nanoflake van der Waals Fe3GeTe2. Nat. Commun. 9, 1554 (2018).
Ikeda, S. et al. A perpendicular-anisotropy CoFeB–MgO magnetic tunnel junction. Nat. Mater. 9, 721–724 (2010).
Ueno, K. et al. Anomalous Hall effect in anatase Ti1−xCoxO2−δ above room temperature. J. Appl. Phys. 103, 07D114 (2008).
Arrott, A. Criterion for ferromagnetism from observations of magnetic isotherms. Phys. Rev. 108, 1394–1396 (1957).
Ohno, H. et al. Electric-field control of ferromagnetism. Nature 408, 944–946 (2000).
Albertini, O. R. et al. Zone-center phonons of bulk, few-layer, and monolayer 1T-TaS2 : detection of commensurate charge density wave phase through Raman scattering. Phys. Rev. B 93, 214109 (2016).
Tsen, A. W. et al. Structure and control of charge density waves in two-dimensional 1T-TaS2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15054–15059 (2015).
Fisher, M. E. & Barber, M. N. Scaling theory for finite-size effects in the critical region. Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1516–1519 (1972).
Ritchie, D. S. & Fisher, M. E. Finite-size and surface effects in Heisenberg films. Phys. Rev. B 7, 480–494 (1973).
Zhang, R. & Willis, R. F. Thickness-dependent Curie temperatures of ultrathin magnetic films: effect of the range of spin-spin interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2665–2668 (2001).
Huang, F., Mankey, G. J., Kief, M. T. & Willis, R. F. Finite-size scaling behavior of ferromagnetic thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 73, 6760–6762 (1993).
Ambrose, T. & Chien, C. L. Finite-size scaling in thin antiferromagnetic CoO layers. J. Appl. Phys. 79, 5920 (1996).
Henkel, M., Andrieu, S., Bauer, P. & Piecuch, M. Finite-size scaling in thin Fe/Ir(100) Layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4783–4786 (1998).
Stoner, E. C. & Wohlfarth, E. P. A mechanism of magnetic hysteresis in heterogeneous alloys. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 240, 599–642 (1948).
Evtushinsky, D. V. et al. Pseudogap-driven sign reversal of the Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 236402 (2008).
Zhao, S. Y. F. et al. Controlled electrochemical intercalation of graphene/h-BN van der Waals heterostructures. Nano Lett. 18, 460–466 (2018).
Lei, B. et al. Gate-tuned superconductor-insulator transition in (Li,Fe)OHFeSe. Phys. Rev. B 93, 060501 (2016).
Lei, B. et al. Tuning phase transitions in FeSe thin flakes by field-effect transistor with solid ion conductor as the gate dielectric. Phys. Rev. B 95, 020503 (2017).
Hohenberg, P. & Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 136, B864–B871 (1964).
Kohn, W. & Sham, L. J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 140, A1133–A1138 (1965).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).
Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).
Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Perdew, J. P. & Zunger, A. Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems. Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048–5079 (1981).
Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).
Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S. & Goerigk, L. Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 1456–1465 (2011).
Chen, B. et al. Magnetic properties of layered itinerant electron ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 82, 124711 (2013).
Xiang, H., Lee, C., Koo, H.-J., Gong, X. & Whangbo, M.-H. Magnetic properties and energy-mapping analysis. Dalton Trans. 42, 823–853 (2013).
Xiang, H. J., Kan, E. J., Wei, S.-H., Whangbo, M.-H. & Gong, X. G. Predicting the spin-lattice order of frustrated systems from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 84, 224429 (2011).
Acknowledgements
We thank X. Jin, B. Lian and G. Chen for discussions. Part of the sample fabrication was conducted at Fudan Nano-fabrication Laboratory. Y.D., Y. Yu, Y.S., J.W. and Y.Z. acknowledge support from National Key Research Program of China (grant nos. 2016YFA0300703, 2018YFA0305600), NSF of China (grant nos U1732274, 11527805, 11425415 and 11421404), Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission (grant no. 18JC1410300), and Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. XDB30000000). Y. Yu also acknowledges support from China Postdoc Innovation Talent Support Program. N.Z.W. and X.H.C. acknowledge support from the ‘Strategic Priority Research Program’ of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. XDB04040100) and the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program; grant no. 2012CB922002). X.H.C. also acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 11534010) and the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS (grant no. QYZDY-SSW-SLH021). J. Zhu acknowledges financial support from Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) under grant no. 4053084, from the University Grants Committee of Hong Kong under grant no. 24300814, and the Start-up Funding of CUHK. J.W. also acknowledges support from the NSF of China (grant no. 11774065). Z.S., Y. Yi and S.W. acknowledge support from the National Basic Research Program of China (grant no. 2014CB921601).
Reviewer information
Nature thanks I. Zutic and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.Z. conceived the project. N.Z.W. and X.H.C. grew the bulk FGT crystal. Y.D., Y.S. and Y. Yu developed device fabrication method. Y.D. fabricated devices and performed electric measurements with the help of Y. Yu. Z.S., Y. Yi and S.W. performed optical measurements. Y.D., Y. Yu, Y.Z.W. and Y.Z. analysed the data. J. Zhang and J. Zhu carried out DFT calculations; J.W. carried out theoretical calculations and modelling; and all three performed theoretical analysis. Y.D., Y. Yu, J.W. and Y.Z. wrote the paper and all authors commented on it.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 Characterization of FGT bulk crystal.
a, Powder X-ray diffraction pattern of bulk FGT crystal. b, Temperature-dependent magnetization of bulk FGT measured during zero-field cooling (ZFC, blue curve) and field cooling (FC, red curve) with an external magnetic field of 0.1 T. (a.u., arbitrary units; emu, electromagnetic unit for magnetic moment).
Extended Data Fig. 2 FGT thin-flake device fabrication.
a, A representative optical image of FGT thin flakes exfoliated on top of Al2O3 film supported on a sapphire substrate. The image was captured with a CCD camera mounted on an optical microscope operating in transmission mode. b, Cross-sectional profile of optical transmission \({G}_{{\rm{sample}}}^{{\rm{T}}}/{G}_{{\rm{substrate}}}^{{\rm{T}}}\) along the black line in a. Scale bar, 10 μm. c, Layer-dependent optical transmission extracted from the image shown in a. The black line is a fit to the data (blue squares) using the Beer–Lambert law. d, e, Optical images obtained in transmission mode (d) and reflection mode (e) for a typical monolayer sample. f, Device fabricated from the monolayer sample shown in d and e. Electrical contacts to the sample were made with indium microelectrodes. Scale bar, 100 μm. g, h, Optical images obtained in transmission mode (g) and reflection mode (h) for a typical trilayer sample. i, Device fabricated from the trilayer sample shown in g and h. Electrical contacts to the sample were made with thermally evaporated Cr/Au electrodes. Scale bar, 100 μm. The optical transmission of the monolayer and trilayer sample shown in d and g are presented as red dots in c.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Determining Tc by Arrott plot analysis.
a–c, Rxy as a function of external magnetic field μ0H obtained in a monolayer (a), bilayer (b) and trilayer (c) FGT device at varying temperatures. d, Arrott plots of the Hall resistance data of the bilayer sample shown in b. The temperature is varied from 72 K to 124 K with a 4 K interval. Black lines are line fits at high magnetic fields (from μ0H = 2.25T to μ0H = 3T). e, Spontaneous Hall resistance \({R}_{xy}^{{\rm{s}}}\) as a function of temperature obtained from FGT samples with varying number of layers. \({R}_{xy}^{{\rm{s}}}\) are normalized by their values at T = 1.5K. Tc is determined by the temperature where \({R}_{xy}^{{\rm{s}}}\) approaches zero.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Determining Tc from RMCD measurements.
a, Optical image of monolayer, bilayer and trilayer FGT samples. Scale bar, 10 μm. b–e, Polar RMCD signal as a function of magnetic field recorded in monolayer (b), bilayer (c), trilayer (d) and bulk (e) samples at various temperatures. The bulk sample refers to an 18-layer sample with the thickness determined from optical transmission. f, Remanent RMCD signal at zero magnetic field as a function of temperature obtained from datasets shown in b–e. The Tc of each sample is determined by the temperature where remanent RMCD signal vanishes. Vertical error bars represent the measurement uncertainty of the remanent RMCD signal.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Finite-size scaling of Tc in FGT thin flakes.
Tc shown here is obtained from anomalous Hall measurements. We used the highest Tc at each sample thickness for the analysis. Error bars are defined as in Fig. 2d.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Angle-dependent Hall resistance of a four-layer FGT flake.
a, Rxy as a function of magnetic field recorded at various tilt angles. Data were obtained at T = 1.5 K. b, Rxy as a function of magnetic field recorded at θH = 90° (blue) and θH = 20° (red) at T = 150 K, about 5 K above the Tc determined by anomalous Hall measurements in the same sample. c, θM as a function of θH. θM was extracted from the Rxy data at μ0H = 3 T in a. The solid line is a fit to the Stoner–Wohlfarth model. A Ku value of 5.1 × 105 J m−3 is obtained from the fit, if Ms takes the value of about 1.8μB per Fe atom. The broken line marks θM = θH that corresponds to Ku = 0.
Extended Data Fig. 7 Ionic gating of an FGT trilayer ionic field-effect transistor.
a, Temperature-dependent RAH at representative Vg under a small external magnetic field of μ0H0 = 0.01 T. The ferromagnetic transition temperature Tc is extracted by extrapolating RAH to zero. b, Sample resistance Rxx as a function of Vg during the up-sweep (blue) and down sweep (red) of Vg. Data were obtained at T = 330 K. c, Tc as a function of Vg during the up-sweep (blue) and down sweep (red) of Vg. Tc exhibits reasonably good reversibility under gate modulation, even though Rxx acquires a large background, possibly due to sample degradation. Data were obtained from the same device discussed in Fig. 3. The error bars are also defined the same way as in Fig. 3. d, Line fits of Rxy as a function of μ0H in the range of 3 T < μ0H < 5 T at three representative gate voltages. RH is obtained as the slope of the line fits. e, Inverse of eRH as a function of Vg during the up-sweep (blue) and down-sweep (red) of the gate voltage. Data were obtained at T = 240 K. Error bars represent the standard deviations of the line fits in d.
Extended Data Fig. 8 Thickness dependence of the gate modulation in a FGT ionic field-effect transistor.
Sample resistance measured as a function of Vg in trilayer (black), 10-layer (red) and 70-layer (blue) FGT devices. Resistances are normalized by their values at Vg = 0 V.
Extended Data Fig. 9 Calculated exchange parameters.
a, The top view shows Jin1 to Jin6 for the intralayer (in plane) coupling. b, The side view shows Jz1 to Jz4 for the interlayer (out of plane) coupling. Only Fe ions are shown in the structure. The purple and red atoms are FeI and FeII ions, respectively. c, The left column shows the calculated exchange parameters for bulk FGT, Jini for intralayer and Jzi for interlayer, in a 3 × 3 × 1 bulk supercell. The right column shows the spin exchange parameters in a monolayer 3 × 3 × 1 supercell, denoted as Jxxi (Jyyi) and Jzzi. The units of J are millielectronvolts. The results indicate that the exchange coupling J is largely isotropic.
Extended Data Fig. 10 LDA calculation of DOS and average magnetic moment as a function of electron doping level.
a, Calculated DOS for trilayer FGT as a function of electron doping level. b, Calculated average magnetic moment in bulk FGT as a function of electron doping level.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deng, Y., Yu, Y., Song, Y. et al. Gate-tunable room-temperature ferromagnetism in two-dimensional Fe3GeTe2. Nature 563, 94–99 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0626-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0626-9
- Springer Nature Limited
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Distinct skyrmion phases at room temperature in two-dimensional ferromagnet Fe3GaTe2
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Extraordinary phase transition revealed in a van der Waals antiferromagnet
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Direct synthesis of controllable ultrathin heteroatoms-intercalated 2D layered materials
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Large anomalous transverse transport properties in atomically thin 2D Fe3GaTe2
NPG Asia Materials (2024)
-
High-temperature Néel skyrmions in Fe3GaTe2 stabilized by Fe intercalation into the van der Waals gap
npj Spintronics (2024)