Abstract
The surface receptor triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) plays a crucial role in maintaining a multitude of microglial activities, such as survival, proliferation, migration, metabolism, inflammation, and phagocytosis. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying TREM2-mediated microglial activities remain largely elusive. Herein, we found that TREM2 interacted with the type I transmembrane protein TMEM59, whose expression could facilitate autophagic flux through its carboxyl-terminus. TMEM59 expression was decreased upon lipopolysaccharide treatment. While downregulation of TMEM59 promoted anti-inflammatory factor expression and attenuated lipopolysaccharide treatment-induced inflammation. Importantly, we found that overexpression of TREM2 reduced TMEM59 protein levels through promoting its degradation, whereas TMEM59 levels were elevated in Trem2-deficient microglia. Finally, impaired survival, proliferation, migration, and phagocytosis, as well as dysregulated autophagy and metabolism in Trem2-deficient microglia were attenuated upon TMEM59 silencing. Together, our findings reveal a novel function of TREM2 in mediating TMEM59 protein degradation and demonstrate the importance of TMEM59 homeostasis in maintaining TREM2-mediated microglial activities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Microglia are the principal immune cells residing in the central nervous system (CNS) and crucial for brain immunosurveillance1. In addition to functioning in host defense against infectious pathogens, microglia have been found to participate in various neurological disorders including neurodevelopment and neurodegenerative diseases2,3,4,5. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disease and multiple genes important for maintaining normal microglia functions, such as triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2), apolipoprotein E (APOE), complement receptor 1 (CR1), cluster of differentiation 33 (CD33), and ATP-binding cassette transporter A7 (ABCA7) have been genetically linked to AD6.
TREM2 is a type 1 transmembrane receptor protein containing an extracellular domain, a transmembrane domain, and a short cytoplasmic tail7. In the CNS, TREM2 is dominantly expressed in microglia and interacts with the protein adaptor DAP12, which transmits intracellular signals upon ligand binding of TREM28. It has been reported that the extracellular domain of TREM2 can bind to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS)9, phospholipids10, amyloid-β (Aβ) oligomers11,12,13, APOE and APOJ and related lipoproteins14,15,16, and apoptotic neurons17. Activation of the TREM2-DAP12-signaling pathway promotes microglial survival, proliferation, clustering, and phagocytosis18,19,20,21. Homozygous loss-of-function mutations in TREM2 as well as DAP12 have been reported to cause Nasu–Hakola disease (NHD), in which patients develop systemic bone cysts and presenile dementia22,23. More recently, heterozygous TREM2 mutations have been found to be associated with AD24,25,26, and then with Parkinson’s disease, frontotemporal dementia, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis27,28,29,30. AD-associated mutations lead to TREM2 dysfunction, so that microgliosis is compromised in such mutation-carrying patients and related AD model mice31,32. Both increased and decreased DNA methylation in the TREM2 gene have been reported33,34,35,36, though increased TREM2 expression has been consistently found in AD patients and mouse models and may be associated with the recruitment of microglia to amyloid plaques37. Moreover, TREM2 deficiency has been found to impair mTOR activation, increase autophagy, and cause metabolic dysfunctions in microglia18,20,38. Since dysregulated autophagy also plays an important role in AD39,40, elucidation of the molecular mechanism underlying TREM2 deficiency-caused autophagy change may provide new insight into disease intervention.
TMEM59 (also known as dendritic cell-derived factor 1, DCF1) is a ubiquitously expressed type I transmembrane protein. TMEM59 contains an ATG16L1-binding motif that promotes local activation of LC3 and evokes autophagy41,42. Previous studies suggested that TMEM59 could regulate neural stem cell differentiation43,44, dendritic spine development45, neuropeptide expression46, glioblastoma cell proliferation/apoptosis47,48, the Wnt signaling through interacting with the Wnt receptor Frizzled (FZD)49, and glycosylation and processing of the Alzheimer-associated Aβ precursor protein50. Interestingly, hypomethylation of the TMEM59 gene has been found in postmortem frontal cortex of late-onset AD patients51, suggesting that TMEM59 may be affected by AD and possibly other neurological or neurodegenerative diseases. One recent work noted that TMEM59 deficiency attenuated microglia activation during neuroinflammation, but the underlying mechanism was unknown52. Herein, we further confirmed that TMEM59 could facilitate autophagic flux through its carboxyl-terminus. Moreover, we found that LPS treatment reduced TMEM59 expression, whereas downregulation of TMEM59 promoted anti-inflammatory factor expression and alleviated LPS treatment-induced neuroinflammation. Importantly, we demonstrated that TMEM59 could interact with TREM2, which in turn mediated the degradation of TMEM59. While downregulation of TMEM59 promoted microglial survival, proliferation, migration, phagocytosis, and mitochondrial function, and attenuated impairments of these activities in TREM2-deficient microglia.
Results
TMEM59 promotes autophagy through its carboxyl terminus
Our previous work as well as others have shown that overexpression of full-length TMEM59 could induce LC3 activation. One study suggested that an intracellular domain of TMEM59 mediated its interaction with ATG16L1 for this activity41. Here we generated human TMEM59 amino-terminal fragment (NTF) and carboxyl-terminal fragment (CTF) (Fig. 1a) plasmids and found that overexpression of TMEM59-CTF, but not TMEM59-NTF, could dramatically increase the ratio of LC3B-II/LC3B-I just like overexpression of full length TMEM59 did in both HEK293T cells (Supplementary Fig. 1) and the mouse microglial BV2 cell line (Fig. 1b). When different TMEM59 plasmids were co-transfected with a GFP-tagged LC3B plasmid into BV2 cells, we found that both full length TMEM59 (Fig. 1c) and TMEM59-CTF (Fig. 1d) interacted with LC3B, whereas TMEM59-NTF did not (Fig. 1e). To further study whether TMEM59 overexpression promotes the ratio of LC3B-II/LC3B-I through enhancing autophagic flux or through interfering with the autolysosome formation and thus LC3B-II degradation, we co-expressed different TMEM59 plasmids with an mCherry-GFP-LC3B plasmid in HEK293T cells. As the GFP signal is quenched under an acidic environment in the autophagolysosome, an increase of the mCherry/GFP signal ratio may indicate elevated autophagic flux. We found that overexpression of both full length TMEM59 and TMEM59-CTF, but not TMEM59-NTF significantly increased the ratio of mCherry/GFP signal (Fig. 1f). Moreover, downregulation of TMEM59 reduced the ratio of LC3B-II/LC3B-I in BV2 cells (Fig. 1g). Together, our results suggest that TMEM59 promotes autophagy through its CTF.
TMEM59 is involved in neuroinflammation
As microglia are the primary immune effector cells in the CNS, we studied the potential role of TMEM59 in neuroinflammation. Delivery of a Tmem59-specific siRNA into mouse primary microglia significantly reduced TMEM59 protein levels at 48–72 h after electroporation (Supplementary Fig. 2). Moreover, when Tmem59 expression was downregulated in mouse primary microglia (Fig. 2a) and BV2 cells (Supplementary Fig. 3a) by siRNA, the expression of the pro-inflammatory factor IL-1β (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 3b), but not another two pro-inflammatory factors IL-6 and TNFα (Fig. 2c, d and Supplementary Fig. 3c, d), was significantly reduced. While the expression of anti-inflammatory factors including ARG1 and YM1 was significantly increased (Fig. 2e, f and Supplementary Fig. 3e, f). Interestingly, when cells were treated with LPS, Tmem59 expression was markedly reduced (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 3a). Moreover, downregulation of Tmem59 attenuated the elevated expression of pro-inflammatory factors and decreased the expression of anti-inflammatory factors upon LPS treatment (Fig. 2b–f, and Supplementary Fig. 3b–f). Overall, the results from primary microglia and BV2 cells were comparable, except that LPS treatment had a better effect on reversing Tmem59 downregulation-induced Ym1 expression in primary microglia (about 34% reduction, Fig. 2f) than in BV2 cells (about 10% reduction, Supplementary Fig. 2f). Together, our results suggest that TMEM59 is involved in the microglial inflammatory activity and that downregulation of TMEM59 can ameliorate LPS treatment-induced inflammation.
TMEM59 interacts with TREM2
Since both TREM2 and TMEM59 are type I transmembrane proteins, we explored their potential interactions. We found marked colocalizations between co-expressed TREM2 and TMEM59 (Fig. 3a). We generated various TREM2 and TMEM59 truncated constructs (Figs. 1a and 3b) and carried out co-immunoprecipitation assays in BV2 cells. We indeed found that full-length TREM2 interacted with full-length TMEM59 (Fig. 3c). Similar to TREM2, the receptor for colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF1R) is also a type I transmembrane protein and expressed in microglia, and plays an essential role for microglial survival and physiological functions53. Therefore, we used CSF1R as a control and found that TMEM59 had no interaction with CSF1R (Supplementary Fig. 4), suggesting that the TMEM59–TREM2 interaction is specific.
Moreover, we found that full-length TREM2 interacted with TMEM59-CTF (Fig. 3d) and TMEM59-NTF (Fig. 3e), both of which possess the transmembrane domain. While full-length TMEM59 interacted with TREM2-CTF that contains the transmembrane domain (Fig. 3f) but not TREM2-NTF that has no the transmembrane domain (Fig. 3g). Together, these results indicate that TREM2 interacts with TMEM59 most likely through their transmembrane domains.
TREM2 promotes TMEM59 protein degradation
When TREM2 was co-expressed with TMEM59 in BV2 cells, we noticed that TMEM59 protein levels were dramatically reduced compared to controls, whereas co-expression of TMEM59 did not affect TREM2 protein levels (Fig. 4a). Overexpression of TREM2 also reduced endogenous TMEM59 protein levels in BV2 cells (Fig. 4b). However, overexpression of TREM2 had no effect on endogenous Tmem59 mRNA levels (Supplementary Fig. 5a), and overexpression of TMEM59 had no effect on endogenous Trem2 mRNA levels in BV2 cells (Supplementary Fig. 5b). Moreover, TMEM59 protein levels were significantly increased in Trem2 knockout (KO) microglia, accompanied by increased LC3B-II levels (Fig. 4c). While Tmem59 mRNA expression was not altered in Trem2 KO microglia (Supplementary Fig. 5c). Downregulation of TMEM59 had no effect on endogenous Trem2 mRNA levels in mouse primary microglia (Supplementary Fig. 5d). These results suggest that TREM2 affects TMEM59 protein levels at post-translational levels.
When cycloheximide (CHX) was applied to inhibit protein synthesis in BV2 cells, we found that co-expressing full length TREM2 (Fig. 4d) and TREM2-CTF (Fig. 4e) but not TREM2-NTF (Supplementary Fig. 5e) dramatically promoted TMEM59 protein degradation, whereas co-expressing TMEM59 had no effect on TREM2 degradation (Supplementary Fig. 5f). Co-expressing TREM2-CTF (Supplementary Fig. 5g) but not TREM2-NTF (Supplementary Fig. 5h) also significantly reduced TMEM59 levels. Furthermore, both co-treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 and with the lysosome inhibitor NH4Cl rescued the degradation of TMEM59 (Supplementary Fig. 5i), suggesting that TMEM59 is degraded through both proteasomal and lysosomal pathways. However, co-treatment with MG132 or NH4Cl showed no effect on reversing full-length TREM2 degradation (Supplementary Fig. 5i). One possible explanation for this is that during its degradation, TREM2 can still be cleaved by α- and γ-secretases54,55, so that inhibition of proteasomal or lysosomal pathways fails to restore full-length TREM2 levels.
Downregulation of TMEM59 promotes microglial activities and attenuates microglial activity impairment in Trem2 KO microglia
TREM2 plays an essential role in maintaining normal microglial activities. TREM2 deficiency can alter autophagy and cause mitochondria dysfunctions in microglia18,20,38. Therefore, we studied whether increased TMEM59 in Trem2 KO microglia mediates these impairments. We found that downregulation of TMEM59 not only reduced LC3B-II levels in wild type (WT) microglia, but also reversed the elevation of LC3B-II levels in Trem2 KO microglia (Fig. 5a). Moreover, we noticed that downregulation of TMEM59 promoted ATP production and oxygen consumption rate (OCR) in WT microglia, and rescued the compromised ATP production and OCR in Trem2 KO microglia (Fig. 5b, c). Mitochondrial membrane potential is related to the capacity for cells to generate ATP by oxidative phosphorylation and has been considered as a key indicator of cell health or injury56. We also found that mitochondrial membrane potential was impaired in Trem2 KO microglia, and downregulation of TMEM59 dramatically increased mitochondrial membrane potential in both WT and Trem2 KO microglia (Fig. 5d).
Previous studies have suggested that TREM2 deficiency impairs various microglial activities18,19,20,21. Here we confirmed that Trem2 KO microglia had deficits in survival (Fig. 6a), proliferation (Fig. 6b), migration (Fig. 6c), and phagocytotic activity (Fig. 6d, e). Moreover, we found that downregulation of TMEM59 promoted all these microglial activities in WT microglia and attenuated all observed impairments in Trem2 KO microglia (Fig. 6a–e). Finally, we found that when WT microglia were subjected to deprivation of the granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Supplementary Fig. 6a, b) or endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress induced by tunicmycin treatment (Supplementary Fig. 6c, d), downregulation of TMEM59 could also promote cell survival and proliferation, implying that downregulation of TMEM59 exerts a broad protection against various cell stresses.
Discussion
TREM2 is specifically expressed in microglia in the CNS and plays an essential role in maintaining normal microglial activities. TREM2 mutations have recently been associated with AD and some other neurodegenerative diseases. However, the detailed molecular mechanisms underlying the participation of TREM2 in various physiological and pathological conditions have yet to be fully elucidated.
Herein, we have identified a novel function for TREM2 to regulate TMEM59 protein degradation through protein–protein interactions. Both TREM2 and TMEM59 are type I transmembrane proteins. It has been shown that TREM2 interacts with its ligands through the extracellular N-terminal domain and transduce the signals through the C-terminus that interacts with DAP12. Our results suggested that TREM2 interacted with TMEM59 most likely through their transmembrane domains (Fig. 7). One recent study also found that TMEM59 interacted with the Wnt receptor FZD and LRP6 at the intramembranous domain, and played as a positive regulator of Wnt signaling49. Moreover, in addition to previous studies finding that TMEM59 can interact with ATG16L1, an important autophagy factor through a motif near the TMEM59 C-terminus, we showed here that TMEM59 C-terminus could interact with the activated form of LC3B, LC3B-II, and promote autophagic flux. Therefore, different domains of TMEM59 and TREM2 may mediate their diverse functions through interacting with various effectors.
TMEM59 is a ubiquitously expressed protein that also exists in microglia, as well as in neurons and astrocytes. TMEM59 has been shown to modulate APP glycosylation and processing50, and regulate autophagy41,42. Some recent work also found that TMEM59 could regulate neural stem cell differentiation43,44, dendritic spine development45, and microglia activation during neuroinflammation52. Nevertheless, detailed functions of TMEM59 in the CNS remain largely unclear. Herein, we found that downregulation of TMEM59 reduced pro-inflammatory factor expression and enhanced anti-inflammatory factor expression. Moreover, TMEM59 was downregulated upon inflammatory insults such as LPS treatment. While downregulation of TMEM59 dramatically attenuated LPS treatment-induced inflammatory responses. These results indicate that TMEM59 plays an important role in mediating microglial activities and suggest that TMEM59 reduction may be self-defense of microglia against inflammatory insults.
TREM2 deficiency results in impaired microglial survival, proliferation, migration and phagocytotic activities, and aberrant autophagy and metabolism. We confirmed such impairments and further found that TMEM59 levels were elevated in Trem2 KO microglia. Importantly, we showed that downregulation of TMEM59 in Trem2 KO microglia largely reversed these impairments, suggesting that abnormal elevation of TMEM59 is a cause to induce microglial impairments upon loss of TREM2. Since downregulation of TMEM59 in WT microglia also promoted all microglial activities described here, TMEM59 and TREM2 may have parallel and additive functions. In summary, our findings demonstrate the importance of TMEM59 in mediating TREM2 functions in microglia (Fig. 7). Since TREM2 has been considered as a therapeutic target for treating AD, further scrutiny on TMEM59-mediated downstream pathways may provide new avenues for disease intervention.
Materials and methods
Cell cultures and animals
HEK293T, Hela, and BV2 cells were originally from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) and maintained in our laboratory. These cells and mouse primary microglial cells were prepared and cultured as previously described19,42,57,58. Trem2 KO mice (in C57BL/6N background) and the corresponding WT control mice were from the UC Davis Knockout Mouse Project (KOMP) repository as described previously59 and were bred in the Animal Centre of Xiamen University. Animal procedures were in accordance with the National Institutes of Health’s Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Xiamen University.
Plasmids
TMEM59-Myc and TMEM59-GFP were constructed previously42. TREM2-Myc, TREM2-GFP, and TREM2-CTF-Myc were also constructed previously60. TMEM59-NTF, TMEM59-CTF, and TREM2-NTF were constructed using the pcDNA3.1-Myc/His construct (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) as the backbone. The mCherry-GFP-LC3B plasmid was purchased from BioVector NTCC (Beijing, China). The CSF1R-HA plasmid was purchased from Sino Biological (Beijing, China).
Transfection
For HEK293T and Hela cells, plasmids were transfected using Turbofect reagent (Thermo Fisher), following the manufacturer’s protocol. For BV2 cells, plasmids were transfected by electroporation using an Amaxa Nucleofector (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) and Amaxa_Cell Line Nucleofector_Kit T (Lonza), following the manufacturer’s instruction.
Tmem59 knockdown by siRNA
Downregulation of Tmem59 was carried out by electroporation of gene-specific siRNAs using an Amaxa Nucleofector and Amaxa_Cell Line Nucleofector_Kit T (for BV2 cells) or Basic Glial Cells Nucleofector™ Kit (Lonza, for primary microglia), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Each electroporation reaction contained 4 × 106 cells and 200 nM siRNA. The Tmem59 siRNA used was: 5′-GGACCAAGCUGGAAUGUGATT-3′. A scramble siRNA (5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′) was used as control. At 48–72 h after electroporation, cells were subjected to further experiments.
LPS treatment and quantitative real time-PCR (qRT-PCR)
BV2 and mouse primary microglial cells were subjected to Tmem59 downregulation, and then treated with 500 ng/ml LPS (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 6 h. Total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol® reagent (Thermo Fisher) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using the Rever Tra Ace qPCR RT Kit (TOYOBO, Shanghai, China). qRT-PCR was performed using the FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (Sigma-Aldrich) with primers designed for target genes. PCR primers used were as follows:
β-actin Forward, 5′-AGCCATGTACGTAGCCATCCA-3′;
β-actin Reverse, 5′-TCTCCGGAGTCCATCACAATG-3′;
Tmem59 Forward, 5′-GGCAGAACTCATCAGGTCGCT-3′;
Tmem59 Reverse, 5′-GCATTCTTGGCATCAGGGACA-3′;
Il1β Forward, 5′-GCAACTGTTCCTGAACTCAACT-3′;
Il1β Reverse, 5′-ATCTTTTGGGGTCCGTCAACT-3′;
Il6 Forward, 5′-CAATGGCAATTCTGATTGTATG-3′;
Il6 Reverse, 5′-AGGACTCTGGCTTTGTCTTTC-3′;
Tnfα Forward, 5′-CCCTCACACTCAGATCATCTTCT-3′;
Tnfα Reverse, 5′-GCTACGACGTGGGCTACAG-3′;
Trem2 Forward, 5′-TGCTGGCAAAGGAAAGGTG-3′;
Trem2 Reverse, 5′-GTTGAGGGCTTGGGACAGG-3′;
Arg1 Forward, 5′-CACAGTCTGGCAGTTGGAAGC-3′;
Arg1 Reverse, 5′-CTTTGGCAGATATGCAGGGAG-3′;
Ym1 Forward, 5′-CAGGTCTGGCAATTCTTCTGAA-3′;
Ym1 Reverse, 5′-GTCTTGCTCATGTGTGTAAGTGA-3′.
Western blot and co-immunoprecipitation
Cells were lysed in NP-40 lysis buffer (25 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 1% Nonidet P-40) supplemented with the Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany). Equal amounts of protein lysates were analyzed by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), and immunoblotted with antibodies. Primary antibodies used were: anti-TMEM59 (97597, Abcam, Cambridge, UK); anti-LC3B (3868, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA); anti-α-tubulin (MABT205, Millipore); anti-Myc (sc-40, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA); anti-HA (M20003, Abmart, Berkeley Heights, CA, USA); and anti-GFP (M20004, Abmart; or 2956, Cell Signaling Technology). Secondary antibodies used were horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (31460) and HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (31430) from Thermo Fisher. Proteins were visualized using ECL Western blotting detection reagents (Millipore). Protein band intensity was quantified using the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
For co-immunoprecipitation, cells were co-transfected with Myc-tagged or GFP-tagged various TREM2 and TMEM59 plasmids for 24 h. Equal amounts of protein lysates were incubated with antibodies against Myc or GFP, or mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) and Protein G Agarose beads (Thermo Fisher) overnight. Immunocomplexes and 10% amounts of cell lysates for immunoprecipitation (as input) were analyzed by Western blot with antibodies against Myc or GFP to recognize immunoprecipitated proteins.
Immunofluorescence
Cells were grown on coverslips in 24-well plates. After transfection for 24 h, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS, and blocked in 5% bovine serum albumin. Cells were incubated with an anti-Myc antibody at 4 °C overnight, and incubated with appropriate fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibodies including Alexa-Fluor-594-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (A-11005) and Alexa-Fluor-635-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (A-31574) from Thermo Fisher. Coverslips were mounted with ProLongTM Gold Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Thermo Fisher). Fluorescence was visualized under a confocal microscope (FV10-ASW, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Protein degradation assay
BV2 cells were transfected with indicated plasmids and equally split. Cells were then treated with 50 μM CHX (Sigma-Aldrich) for different time periods (0, 2, 4, and 8 h). Alternatively, cells were treated with 50 μM CHX in the presence of 20 μM the proteasomal inhibitor MG132 (ApexBio, Houston, TX, USA) or 30 μM the lysosomal inhibitor NH4Cl (Sigma-Aldrich) for 8 h.
ATP assay
ATP levels in cells were determined based on the phosphorylation of glycerol to generate a product that can be quantified fluorometrically, using an ATP assay kit (ab83355, Abcam) and following the manufacturer’s protocol.
OCR measurement
The cellular OCR was determined using the Seahorse XF Cell Mito Stress Test Kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) on the Seahorse XFe 96 Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Agilent), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, 1 × 104 cells per well were seeded into a Seahorse XF 96 cell culture microplate. After baseline measurements, 1 μM oligomycin, 1.5 μM FCCP, and 1.0 μM rotenone–antimycin A were sequentially injected. Data were analyzed using the Seahorse Wave 2.2.0 software package (Agilent). OCR is shown in pmol/min.
Mitochondrial membrane potential measurement
Mitochondrial membrane potential was assayed using the JC-1 Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Assay Kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China), following the manufacturer’s protocols. The fluorescence intensities of JC‑1 monomers that dominate in depolarized mitochondria (shown in green) and JC-1 aggregates that dominate in polarized mitochondria (shown in red) were visualized under a confocal microscope (FV10-ASW, Olympus). Fluorescence quantification was performed using ImageJ.
Growth factor deprivation, ER stress, and cell viability and proliferation assays
Mouse primary microglia were transfected with a scramble control or Tmem59 siRNA and cultured in media with 30 ng/ml GM-CSF (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) for 24 h, and then in media without GM-CSF for another 48 h. Alternatively, after transfection with a scramble control or Tmem59 siRNA for 48 h, cells were treated with 10 μg/ml tunicmycin for 24 h to induce ER stress. The viability of treated cells was assessed using a cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8, Dojindo, Rockville, MD, USA), following the manufacturer’s instruction. Cell proliferation was studied using a BrdU cell proliferation ELISA kit (ab126556, Abcam), following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Transwell migration assay
Cell migration was analyzed using transwell chambers containing 8 µm pore filters (Corning, New York, NY, USA). Briefly, cells were inoculated at a density of 2 × 104 cells/well in the upper chamber with 100 µl DMEM (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Gibco, New York, NY, USA). The lower chamber was added with 600 µl DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS. After 48 h of culturing, the media were discarded and chambers were washed twice with serum-free DMEM. Then 100 μl of serum-free DMEM was added into the upper chamber and 600 µl DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS as chemoattractant was added into the lower chamber. After culturing another 24 h to facilitate cell migration, cells on the upper surface of the insert membrane were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and subjected to hematoxylin–eosin staining. Alternatively, cells on the upper surface of the insert membrane were removed using cotton swabs. Migrated cells on the lower side of the filters were fixed and stained with hematoxylin–eosin. Migrated cells in eight randomly selected vision fields under the microscope were photographed; and cell numbers were counted for comparison.
Phagocytosis assays
Microglial cells were incubated with the pH-dependent pHrodo E. coli BioParticles (Thermo Scientific) for 1 h. After washing with PBS, cells were subjected to flow cytometry to measure the fluorescence intensity. Cells that were not incubated with microspheres served as negative controls and were used for background subtraction. Alternatively, after incubating with and removing unbound BioParticles, microglial cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and stained with DAPI. The fluorescent signals were captured under a fluorescent microscope (Olympus) and analyzed using ImageJ.
Statistical analysis
Data were presented as mean ± SEM and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 6 software. Statistical significance was assessed using the Mann–Whitney U test between two groups, and using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test when more than two groups were compared. p values < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
References
Nimmerjahn, A., Kirchhoff, F. & Helmchen, F. Resting microglial cells are highly dynamic surveillants of brain parenchyma in vivo. Science 308, 1314–1318 (2005).
Hickman, S., Izzy, S., Sen, P., Morsett, L. & El Khoury, J. Microglia in neurodegeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1359–1369 (2018).
Song, W. M. & Colonna, M. The identity and function of microglia in neurodegeneration. Nat. Immunol. 19, 1048–1058 (2018).
Salter, M. W. & Stevens, B. Microglia emerge as central players in brain disease. Nat. Med. 23, 1018–1027 (2017).
Thome, A. D. et al. Functional alterations of myeloid cells during the course of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 13, 61 (2018).
Malik, M. et al. Genetics ignite focus on microglial inflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 10, 52 (2015).
Bouchon, A., Dietrich, J. & Colonna, M. Cutting edge: inflammatory responses can be triggered by TREM-1, a novel receptor expressed on neutrophils and monocytes. J. Immunol. 164, 4991–4995 (2000).
Hickman, S. E. & El Khoury, J. TREM2 and the neuroimmunology of Alzheimer’s disease. Biochem. Pharmacol. 88, 495–498 (2014).
Daws, M. R. et al. Pattern recognition by TREM-2: binding of anionic ligands. J. Immunol. 171, 594–599 (2003).
Wang, Y. et al. TREM2 lipid sensing sustains the microglial response in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Cell 160, 1061–1071 (2015).
Lessard, C. B. et al. High-affinity interactions and signal transduction between Abeta oligomers and TREM2. EMBO Mol. Med. 10, e9027 (2018).
Zhao, Y. et al. TREM2 is a receptor for beta-amyloid that mediates microglial function. Neuron 97, 1023–1031.e7 (2018).
Zhong, L. et al. Amyloid-beta modulates microglial responses by binding to the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2). Mol. Neurodegener. 13, 15 (2018).
Song, W. et al. Alzheimer’s disease-associated TREM2 variants exhibit either decreased or increased ligand-dependent activation. Alzheimers Dement. 13, 381–387 (2017).
Atagi, Y. et al. Apolipoprotein E is a ligand for triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2). J. Biol. Chem. 290, 26043–26050 (2015).
Yeh, F. L., Wang, Y., Tom, I., Gonzalez, L. C. & Sheng, M. TREM2 binds to apolipoproteins, including APOE and CLU/APOJ, and thereby facilitates uptake of amyloid-beta by microglia. Neuron 91, 328–340 (2016).
Hsieh, C. L. et al. A role for TREM2 ligands in the phagocytosis of apoptotic neuronal cells by microglia. J. Neurochem. 109, 1144–1156 (2009).
Zhou, Y., Ulland, T. K. & Colonna, M. TREM2-dependent effects on microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 10, 202 (2018).
Zheng, H. et al. TREM2 promotes microglial survival by activating wnt/beta-catenin pathway. J. Neurosci. 37, 1772–1784 (2017).
Ulland, T. K. et al. TREM2 maintains microglial metabolic fitness in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 170, 649–663.e13 (2017).
Zheng, H. et al. TREM2 in Alzheimer’s disease: microglial survival and energy metabolism. Front. Aging Neurosci. 10, 395 (2018).
Bianchin, M. M. et al. Nasu–Hakola disease (polycystic lipomembranous osteodysplasia with sclerosing leukoencephalopathy–PLOSL): a dementia associated with bone cystic lesions. From clinical to genetic and molecular aspects. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 24, 1–24 (2004).
Paloneva, J. et al. Mutations in two genes encoding different subunits of a receptor signaling complex result in an identical disease phenotype. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 71, 656–662 (2002).
Guerreiro, R. et al. TREM2 variants in Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 117–127 (2013).
Jonsson, T. et al. Variant of TREM2 associated with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 107–116 (2013).
Pottier, C. et al. TREM2 R47H variant as a risk factor for early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 35, 45–49 (2013).
Guerreiro, R. J. et al. Using exome sequencing to reveal mutations in TREM2 presenting as a frontotemporal dementia-like syndrome without bone involvement. JAMA Neurol. 70, 78–84 (2013).
Rayaprolu, S. et al. TREM2 in neurodegeneration: evidence for association of the p.R47H variant with frontotemporal dementia and Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 8, 19 (2013).
Borroni, B. et al. Heterozygous TREM2 mutations in frontotemporal dementia. Neurobiol. Aging 35(934), e937–910 (2014).
Cady, J. et al. TREM2 variant p.R47H as a risk factor for sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 71, 449–453 (2014).
Yuan, P. et al. TREM2 haplodeficiency in mice and humans impairs the microglia barrier function leading to decreased amyloid compaction and severe axonal dystrophy. Neuron 90, 724–739 (2016).
Song, W. M. et al. Humanized TREM2 mice reveal microglia-intrinsic and -extrinsic effects of R47H polymorphism. J. Exp. Med. 215, 745–760 (2018).
Casati, M. et al. Increased expression of TREM2 in peripheral cells from mild cognitive impairment patients who progress into Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Neurol. 25, 805–810 (2018).
Celarain, N. et al. TREM2 upregulation correlates with 5-hydroxymethycytosine enrichment in Alzheimer’s disease hippocampus. Clin. Epigenetics. 8, 37 (2016).
Ozaki, Y. et al. DNA methylation changes at TREM2 intron 1 and TREM2 mRNA expression in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J. Psychiatr. Res. 92, 74–80 (2017).
Smith, A. R. et al. Increased DNA methylation near TREM2 is consistently seen in the superior temporal gyrus in Alzheimer’s disease brain. Neurobiol. Aging 47, 35–40 (2016).
Gratuze, M., Leyns, C. E. G. & Holtzman, D. M. New insights into the role of TREM2 in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 13, 66 (2018).
Kleinberger, G. et al. The FTD-like syndrome causing TREM2 T66M mutation impairs microglia function, brain perfusion, and glucose metabolism. EMBO J. 36, 1837–1853 (2017).
Hamano, T., Hayashi, K., Shirafuji, N. & Nakamoto, Y. The implications of autophagy in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 15, 1283–1296 (2018).
Lachance, V. et al. Autophagy protein NRBF2 has reduced expression in Alzheimer’s brains and modulates memory and amyloid-beta homeostasis in mice. Mol. Neurodegener. 14, 43 (2019).
Boada-Romero, E. et al. TMEM59 defines a novel ATG16L1-binding motif that promotes local activation of LC3. EMBO J. 32, 566–LC582 (2013).
Zheng, Q. et al. The neuron-specific protein TMEM59L mediates oxidative stress-induced cell death. Mol. Neurobiol. 54, 4189–4200 (2017).
Wang, L. et al. A novel function of dcf1 during the differentiation of neural stem cells in vitro. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 28, 887–894 (2008).
Li, X. et al. MicroRNA-351 regulates TMEM 59 (DCF1) expression and mediates neural stem cell morphogenesis. RNA Biol. 9, 292–301 (2012).
Liu, Q. et al. Dcf1 triggers dendritic spine formation and facilitates memory acquisition. Mol. Neurobiol. 55, 763–775 (2018).
Liu, Q., Chen, Y., Li, Q., Wu, L. & Wen, T. Dcf1 regulates neuropeptide expression and maintains energy balance. Neurosci. Lett. 650, 1–7 (2017).
Xie, Y. et al. Overexpression of DCF1 inhibits glioma through destruction of mitochondria and activation of apoptosis pathway. Sci. Rep. 4, 3702 (2014).
Luo, G. et al. Dendritic cell factor 1 inhibits proliferation and migration and induces apoptosis of neuroblastoma cells by inhibiting the ERK signaling pathway. Oncol. Rep. 41, 103–112 (2019).
Gerlach, J. P. et al. TMEM59 potentiates Wnt signaling by promoting signalosome formation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E3996–E4005 (2018).
Ullrich, S. et al. The novel membrane protein TMEM59 modulates complex glycosylation, cell surface expression, and secretion of the amyloid precursor protein. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 20664–20674 (2010).
Bakulski, K. M. et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation differences between late-onset Alzheimer’s disease and cognitively normal controls in human frontal cortex. J. Alzheimers Dis. 29, 571–588 (2012).
Wang, J. et al. Dcf1 deficiency attenuates the role of activated microglia during neuroinflammation. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 11, 256 (2018).
Stanley, E. R. & Chitu, V. CSF-1 receptor signaling in myeloid. Cells Csh Perspect. Biol. 6, a021857 (2014).
Wunderlich, P. et al. Sequential proteolytic processing of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 (TREM2) protein by ectodomain shedding and gamma-secretase-dependent intramembranous cleavage. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 33027–33036 (2013).
Kleinberger, G. et al. TREM2 mutations implicated in neurodegeneration impair cell surface transport and phagocytosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 243ra86 (2014).
Perry, S. W., Norman, J. P., Barbieri, J., Brown, E. B. & Gelbard, H. A. Mitochondrial membrane potential probes and the proton gradient: a practical usage guide. Biotechniques 50, 98–99 (2011).
Zhong, L. et al. Soluble TREM2 induces inflammatory responses and enhances microglial survival. J. Exp. Med. 214, 597–607 (2017).
Huang, X. M. et al. Salubrinal attenuates beta-amyloid-induced neuronal death and microglial activation by inhibition of the NF-kappa B pathway. Neurobiol. Aging 33, e9–e17 (2012).
Jay, T. R. et al. TREM2 deficiency eliminates TREM2+ inflammatory macrophages and ameliorates pathology in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. J. Exp. Med. 212, 287–295 (2015).
Zhong, L. et al. DAP12 stabilizes the C-terminal fragment of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 (TREM2) and protects against LPS-induced pro-inflammatory response. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 15866–15877 (2015).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1705285 and 81771377 to Y.-w.Z.), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC1305903 and 2018YFC2000400 to Y.-w.Z.), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (20720180049 to Y.-w.Z.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by B. Joseph
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Z., Ning, J., Zheng, X. et al. TMEM59 interacts with TREM2 and modulates TREM2-dependent microglial activities. Cell Death Dis 11, 678 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-02874-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-02874-3
- Springer Nature Limited