Abstract
Psychosocial stress triggers a set of behavioral, neural, hormonal, and molecular responses that can be a driving force for survival when adaptive and time-limited, but may also contribute to a host of disease states if dysregulated or chronic. The beneficial or detrimental effects of stress are largely mediated by the hypothalamic-pituitary axis, a highly conserved neurohormonal cascade that culminates in systemic secretion of glucocorticoids. Glucocorticoids activate the glucocorticoid receptor, a ubiquitous nuclear receptor that not only causes widespread changes in transcriptional programs, but also induces lasting epigenetic modifications in many target tissues. While the epigenome remains sensitive to stressors throughout life, we propose two key principles that may govern the epigenetics of stress and glucocorticoids along the lifespan: first, the presence of distinct life periods, during which the epigenome shows heightened plasticity to stress exposure, such as in early development and at advanced age; and, second, the potential of stress-induced epigenetic changes to accumulate throughout life both in select chromatin regions and at the genome-wide level. These principles have important clinical and translational implications, and they show striking parallels with the existence of sensitive developmental periods and the cumulative impact of stressful experiences on the development of stress-related phenotypes. We hope that this conceptual mechanistic framework will stimulate fruitful research that aims at unraveling the molecular pathways through which our life stories sculpt genomic function to contribute to complex behavioral and somatic phenotypes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Psychosocial stress triggers a set of behavioral, neural, hormonal, and molecular responses that can be a driving force for survival when adaptive and time-limited, but may also contribute to a host of disease states if dysregulated or chronic. A primary effector of the stress response is the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, which is set into motion by hypothalamic secretion of corticotropin-releasing hormone and arginine vasopressin in the brain and culminates in adrenal secretion of glucocorticoids in the systemic circulation. At the molecular level, the effects of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation and glucocorticoid signaling are largely mediated by the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), a ubiquitous ligand-dependent transcription factor that drives the genomic actions of glucocorticoids in essentially every body tissue.
While the genomic effects of time-limited stress and glucocorticoid exposure can be largely ascribed to the transcriptional activity of the GR, the lasting consequences of acute, repetitive, or chronic stress are obscure and subject to scientific enquiries. Can exposure to an acute stressor influence genomic regulation long after cessation of the stimulus? Are there distinct periods in life during which genomic regulation may be particularly sensitive to the impact of stress exposure? And, may the effects of concurrently multiple or repetitive stressors over time accumulate and sculpt genomic function, contributing to the development of distinct phenotypes? This perspective addresses these questions and highlights evidence supporting epigenetic regulation as a crucial mechanism that underlies the lasting consequences of stress exposure on genomic function and stress-related phenotypes along the lifespan.
A brief introduction to ‘epigenesis’
Epigenetics—an Aristotelian composite term derived from the Greek prefix ‘epi-’, meaning ‘over’, and the word ‘genetics’—encompasses, in its modern use, an ever-growing repertoire of biological processes that regulate gene expression without changing the underlying DNA sequence. These processes include covalent DNA modifications, such as DNA cytosine methylation and hydroxymethylation, posttranslational histone modifications, noncoding RNAs, and changes in higher-order chromatin conformation.1 Epigenetic mechanisms are well known for their instrumental role in cell differentiation, but they also act as a molecular interface between the genome and the environment. The latter function stems from the epigenome’s ability to dynamically respond to environmental exposures, including life stress, and to adapt genomic function to distinct environments.2 Despite this dynamic responsivity, certain epigenetic signatures can be stabilized during life and even across generations,3, 4, 5 having lasting consequences on genomic function and contributing to the development of complex phenotypes. Consequently, epigenetic regulation represents a prime mechanism for examining the impact of stressful experiences on behavioral and somatic phenotypes.
Glucocorticoid signaling as driver of epigenetic modifications
The GR primarily acts as a ligand-activated transcription factor, which regulates gene transcription in a tissue-specific manner either by directly binding to glucocorticoid response elements (GRE)-conserved DNA sequences in glucocorticoid-responsive genes- or by transactivating or transrepressing other transcription factors via GRE-dependent or -independent mechanisms.6 Beyond these rapid effects on gene transcription, however, accumulating evidence shows that glucocorticoid signaling can also cause epigenetic modifications via a number of distinct mechanisms (Figure 1). Glucocorticoids can rapidly induce methylation changes in cytosine-guanine dinucleotides (CpG) of the DNA (DNA methylation), most notably global decreases in methylation, as well as local demethylation of CpGs located at or near GREs.7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Studies have also documented glucocorticoid-induced DNA hypermethylation in some sites, such as in gene promoter CpGs,14 though this methylation change may be less common than demethylation.10 Although the mechanisms underlying these effects have not been adequately explored, glucocorticoids increase the expression of enzymes involved in active demethylation, such as the Tet family of 5-methylcytosine dioxygenases (TET),12, 15 and decrease the expression and activity of the maintenance methyltransferase DNMT116, 17 and the levels of the de novo methyltransferase DNMT3a.12 Notably, the effects on DNA methylation may be contingent upon the specific developmental and genomic context. For example, prenatal stress induces both TET1 and DNMT1 in a tissue-specific manner,18, 19 suggesting that methylation and demethylation processes are in some cases activated concurrently, promoting dynamic changes in the methylome. Despite this dynamic landscape, some methylation changes are stabilized in select genomic regions through as yet undetermined mechanisms. Glucocorticoid signaling can also induce histone modifications, such as changes in histone methylation and acetylation.6 This can occur at sites of direct GR binding but also by recruitment of other transcription factors; for example, the GR interacts with the RelB/p52 transcription factor and recruits the histone acetyltransferase CREB-binding protein and histone deacetylase-1 at target promoter sites, promoting dynamic acetylation and deacetylation of histone 3 lysine 9.20, 21 Emerging evidence also supports the role of glucocorticoid signaling in the regulation of several microRNAs (miRNAs), such as miR-29a, miR-124 and miR-218.22, 23 Finally, glucocorticoids can promote dynamic chromatin remodeling that may alter accessibility of GR-binding sites to the transcriptional machinery.6
Importantly, the effects of GR activation on the epigenome are characterized by tissue specificity,8, 24 which may be directed by the cell-type-specific binding of the GR to target genomic sites6, 8 and may last long after removal of the stimulus. The enduring effects of GR activation on the epigenome have been supported by studies in mice showing that glucocorticoid-induced changes in DNA methylation persist several weeks after cessation of glucocorticoid action.14, 25 In line with this observation, and, as discussed below, stress exposure, which may influence glucocorticoid signaling, can also result in lasting epigenetic modifications that persist throughout life and even across generations. Such long-lasting changes have been observed for DNA methylation,3, 10, 26 but also for other components of the epigenetic machinery, including histone modifications and the regulation of specific miRNAs.27, 28, 29
In the following sections, we propose and separately examine two key principles that may govern the epigenetic effects of stress and glucocorticoids along the lifespan: first, the presence of distinct life periods during which the epigenome shows heightened plasticity in its response to stress and to aberrant glucocorticoid signaling; and, second, the potential of stress-induced epigenetic changes to accumulate throughout life both in select chromatin regions and at the genome-wide level via the effects of the GR at susceptible genomic sites.
Plasticity periods for stress-induced epigenetic changes
Although a detailed account of all studies examining the epigenetics of psychosocial and/or physical stress is beyond the scope of this article, we highlight work in both humans and rodents showing that stress exposure in various phases of the mammalian life, occurring as early as prenatally and during childhood, but also later in adolescence and adulthood, can result in lasting epigenetic modifications (Figure 2a). In utero exposure to stress can induce profound changes in DNA methylation, including global hypermethylation30 and region-specific hypermethylation or demethylation,19, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 as well as alterations in histone acetylation and in the expression of several specific miRNAs.18, 38, 39, 40 Stress exposure during childhood and adolescence can similarly lead to lasting changes in DNA methylation, including tissue-specific global hypo- or hypermethylation,41, 42 hypermethylation of select CpGs in promoter and other regulatory DNA regions,14, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 and demethylation of CpGs located near GREs,7, 54 as well as alterations in DNA-binding of the methyl CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2),50 histone methylation marks,55 and miRNA expression.56 Finally, stressors occurring during adulthood, most notably chronic stress exposure, can induce a wide range of epigenetic modifications, including hypo- or hypermethylation of promoter and age-related CpGs,10, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 changes in histone acetylation and methylation,57, 66, 67, 68 altered DNA-binding of MeCP2,57 alterations in miRNAs,56, 69, 70 and chromatin remodeling.71
While these studies show that stress exposure in essentially every stage of the mammalian life can set into motion the epigenetic machinery, there is a paucity of studies comparing multiple stressors that occur at distinct life stages and their potential to induce, modulate, and/or stabilize such modifications along the lifespan. In a study examining both childhood and adulthood stress in humans, lasting demethylation of select CpGs located within or in the vicinity of GREs of the stress-responsive FKBP5 gene were shown to result only from childhood trauma,7 indicating that stress exposure early in development may be essential for stabilization of this epigenetic signature. Supporting this finding mechanistically, the same stress-susceptible FKBP5 CpGs were demethylated by exposure to the glucocorticoid receptor agonist dexamethasone (DEX) during the proliferation and differentiation stages of hippocampal progenitor cells, whereas demethylation was not observed if DEX exposure occurred after cell differentiation.7 In a separate study examining the effects of lifetime stress exposure on epigenetic aging measured by a composite CpG methylation-based age predictor,72 life stressors more strongly influenced epigenetic aging in older as compared to younger individuals,10 suggesting enhanced sensitivity of the epigenome to the ‘wear and tear’ effects of stress with advancing age. Thus, similarly to observations that diet and other environmental exposures can induce certain epigenetic changes only when occurring in critical stages of an organism’s development,73, 74, 75 we propose the presence of distinct ‘sensitive’ or ‘high-plasticity periods,’ most strikingly early in development, but also in older ages, during which stressors of certain type and duration can have pronounced and lasting effects on the epigenome (Figure 2b). Despite this global fluctuation in epigenetic plasticity, there may be select regions that remain sensitive to stressors throughout life or during periods of low global plasticity. For example, stressor timing at different developmental stages can determine which CpG sites will be affected,49, 51, 76 with some sites being more susceptible to adulthood than childhood stressors.76 Thus, the plasticity of the epigenome to stressors should be examined both at the global and region-specific levels.
Several mechanisms could explain the life course changes in the epigenetic plasticity to stress. Global increases in the sensitivity of the epigenome to environmental insults may coincide with periods of rapid epigenetic remodeling, such as during the global reprogramming of DNA methylation in the very early prenatal life.74 Beyond such organism-wide epigenetic changes, tissue-specific fine-tuning of epigenetic marks occurs during early development, but also throughout life, and guides tissue differentiation and adaptations through the communication of cells to the internal and external milieu. Rapid epigenetic rearrangements can promote susceptibility of certain genomic regions to GR binding,77 rendering the genome more sensitive to aberrations in glucocorticoid signaling. Aberrant glucocorticoid levels in early life can occur, for example, in response to chronic stress that deregulates the circadian and ultradian rhythmicity of glucocorticoid secretion,78 as well as in utero by maternal exposure to psychosocial stress and deregulated secretion of maternal cortisol, which strongly correlates with cortisol levels in the fetal circulation.79 At the other end of the life spectrum, pronounced chromatin remodeling is observed with aging, which is associated with rearrangement and loss of heterochromatin coupled with extensive changes in histone marks.80 Furthermore, aging results in telomere attrition, which further contributes to genomic instability. A body of evidence has linked telomere shortening with life stress exposure,81, 82 an effect that in interaction with other stress-induced changes might increase susceptibility of the epigenome to stress. Finally, aging could increase the epigenetic plasticity to stress through the synergistic effects of stressors with other environmental factors and with the age-related decline in DNA repair and maintenance mechanisms. The protective role of epigenetic maintenance systems has been demonstrated for other environmental exposures; for instance, aging downregulates DNMT1,83 increasing susceptibility of the methylome to dietary deficits.84
In conclusion, the epigenome remains sensitive to stressors across all stages of mammalian life, but it may be particularly susceptible during periods of rapid epigenetic remodeling or periods of inadequate functioning of epigenetic maintenance systems, such as in early development or at advanced age. As we discuss below, this epigenetic plasticity facilitates the accumulation of tissue-specific epigenetic modifications induced by repetitive exposure to stressors along the lifespan, eventually contributing to the development of complex behavioral and somatic phenotypes.
Cumulative epigenetic effects of stress along the lifespan
The potential of epigenetic modifications to last long after environmental encounters implies that stress-induced epigenetic signatures, embedded in susceptible genomic sites during distinct windows of epigenetic plasticity, may accumulate as life progresses and stressful experiences accrue. This hypothesis is supported by a limited number of studies in humans showing that increasing levels of cumulative life stress or higher numbers of stressors across multiple life stages induce stronger effects on the methylome. For example, increasing numbers of life stressors until the age of 15 years are associated with allele-specific increases in CpG methylation of the promoter of the serotonin transporter gene,51 while higher numbers of stressors until early adulthood predict lower methylation of the promoter of the catechol-O-methyltransferase gene in a dose-response manner.65 Such cumulative effects of stress on specific CpG sites could be mediated by chronic exposure to aberrant glucocorticoid levels. This has been demonstrated in mice for glucocorticoid-sensitive CpGs within the FKBP5 gene, where the extent of demethylation correlates with the total burden of glucocorticoid exposure.85 Beyond the cumulative effects at specific CpGs, epigenetic modifications may accumulate at a systems level via the impact of stress on multiple sites. Supporting this hypothesis, cumulative lifetime stress, but not recent stress alone, was shown to accelerate epigenetic aging.10 The acceleration of epigenetic aging may be driven by GR binding at or near age-related CpGs, which colocalize with GREs and dynamically respond to glucocorticoid exposure. Notably, the effect of lifetime stress was blunted in individuals exposed to higher levels of childhood maltreatment,10 suggesting that repetitive stressors may interact in complex ways, which either promote or attenuate the susceptibility of the epigenome to subsequent life stressors. We propose that stress-induced epigenetic effects accumulate along the lifespan -both in distinct genomic regions and at a systems level- at a rate contingent upon the stage-and context-specific epigenetic plasticity (Figure 2c). Eventually, these cumulative effects may contribute to epigenetic remodeling and sculpt genomic function along the lifespan.
The mechanisms underlying the cumulative effects of stress and determining which epigenetic signatures will be stabilized, reversed, or propagated in response to lifetime stressful experiences are unknown. These mechanisms could involve synergistic actions of several components of the epigenetic machinery that are differentially regulated by stressors of different type, timing, and duration. For example, opposite changes in histone 3 methylation and histone 4 acetylation marks can be induced by chronic vs acute stressors.86, 87 Initial exposure to a stressor could also prime certain components of the epigenetic machinery that are then activated by subsequent stressors. Stress-induced priming has been demonstrated for changes in histone acetylation and in the regulation of several critical pathways, such as the ERK/MAPK pathway.87, 88 Such priming could involve the cooperative induction of different epigenetic changes that show extensive crosstalk; for example, histone modifications may direct DNA methylation changes and vice versa.89 Future studies may uncover these intriguing mechanisms.
Clinical and translational implications
The principles outlined above show striking parallels with key processes that may govern the development of stress-related disorders. Similarly to the existence of ‘plasticity periods’ for the effects of stress on the epigenome, stressful experiences strongly contribute to behavioral and psychiatric phenotypes when they occur during ‘susceptibility windows,’ such as in early life.2, 90, 91 Repetitive or cumulative stress exposure along the lifespan, through the potential accumulation of stress-induced epigenetic changes and their impact on genomic function, may contribute to the development of diverse behavioral or nosologic phenotypes, including general mental health, major depression, and psychosis.92, 93, 94 The long-term establishment of stress-induced epigenetic changes and the development of stress-related phenotypes may be contingent upon the timing, duration, intensity, and burden of lifetime stress exposure, as well as the genetic predisposition of the individual.
Concluding remark
In this article, we present a conceptual mechanistic framework for the epigenetic effects of stress along the lifespan, focusing on the GR as a prime example mediator of these effects. We hope that this framework will stimulate fruitful research that aims at unraveling the molecular mechanisms via which our life stories, through stressful events that happen at sensitive time periods and accrue throughout life, can sculpt our epigenome and shape genomic function. Because psychosocial stress is an independent risk factor for several diseases that are currently the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide,95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101 elucidating the molecular mechanisms that shape this risk could open new opportunities for the prevention and treatment of stress-related pathologies. Intriguingly, pharmaceutical modulation of several stress-induced epigenetic modifications has been achieved in preclinical studies. Examples include the rescue of maltreatment-induced DNA hypermethylation of genes encoding neurotrophic factors by the use of methyltransferase inhibitors,43 the prevention of isolation stress-induced CpG hypermethylation by antagonizing GR activity,14 and the reversal of maternal separation-induced decreases in methylation of histone 3 lysine 9 with the use of sodium valproate.55 Nevertheless, the exact circumstances and tissues in which the modulation of epigenetic signatures will be feasible or desirable remain unclear. While certain stress-induced epigenetic changes may contribute to the pathogenesis of aberrant phenotypes, others may be essential for successful adaptation to stress and survival in ever-changing environments.2 Dissecting the functionally divergent epigenetic changes induced by stressors of different type, timing, and duration will be a formidable task for future studies, but it will provide invaluable insights into the pathogenesis of stress-related disorders.
References
Telese F, Gamliel A, Skowronska-Krawczyk D, Garcia-Bassets I, Rosenfeld MG . ‘Seq-ing’ insights into the epigenetics of neuronal gene regulation. Neuron 2013; 77: 606–623.
Zannas AS, West AE . Epigenetics and the regulation of stress vulnerability and resilience. Neuroscience 2014; 264: 157–170.
Dias BG, Ressler KJ . Parental olfactory experience influences behavior and neural structure in subsequent generations. Nat Neurosci 2014; 17: 89–96.
Gassen NC, Chrousos GP, Binder EB, Zannas AS . Life stress, glucocorticoid signaling, and the aging epigenome: Implications for aging-related diseases. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2016 (in press).
Talens RP, Boomsma DI, Tobi EW, Kremer D, Jukema JW, Willemsen G et al. Variation, patterns, and temporal stability of DNA methylation: considerations for epigenetic epidemiology. FASEB j 2010; 24: 3135–3144.
Vockley CM, D'Ippolito AM, McDowell IC, Majoros WH, Safi A, Song L et al. Direct GR Binding Sites Potentiate Clusters of TF Binding across the Human Genome. Cell 2016; 166: 1269–1281.e1219.
Klengel T, Mehta D, Anacker C, Rex-Haffner M, Pruessner JC, Pariante CM et al. Allele-specific FKBP5 DNA demethylation mediates gene-childhood trauma interactions. Nat Neurosci 2013; 16: 33–41.
Wiench M, John S, Baek S, Johnson TA, Sung MH, Escobar T et al. DNA methylation status predicts cell type-specific enhancer activity. EMBO j 2011; 30: 3028–3039.
Thomassin H, Flavin M, Espinas ML, Grange T . Glucocorticoid-induced DNA demethylation and gene memory during development. EMBO j 2001; 20: 1974–1983.
Zannas AS, Arloth J, Carrillo-Roa T, Iurato S, Roh S, Ressler KJ et al. Lifetime stress accelerates epigenetic aging in an urban, African American cohort: relevance of glucocorticoid signaling. Genome Biol 2015; 16: 266.
Bose R, Moors M, Tofighi R, Cascante A, Hermanson O, Ceccatelli S . Glucocorticoids induce long-lasting effects in neural stem cells resulting in senescence-related alterations. Cell Death Dis 2010; 1: e92.
Bose R, Spulber S, Kilian P, Heldring N, Lonnerberg P, Johnsson A et al. Tet3 mediates stable glucocorticoid-induced alterations in DNA methylation and Dnmt3a/Dkk1 expression in neural progenitors. Cell Death Dis 2015; 6: e1793.
Resmini E, Santos A, Aulinas A, Webb SM, Vives-Gilabert Y, Cox O et al. Reduced DNA methylation of FKBP5 in Cushing's syndrome. Endocrine 2016; 54: 768–777.
Niwa M, Jaaro-Peled H, Tankou S, Seshadri S, Hikida T, Matsumoto Y et al. Adolescent stress-induced epigenetic control of dopaminergic neurons via glucocorticoids. Science 2013; 339: 335–339.
Sawamura T, Klengel T, Armario A, Jovanovic T, Norrholm SD, Ressler KJ et al. Dexamethasone Treatment Leads to Enhanced Fear Extinction and Dynamic Fkbp5 Regulation in Amygdala. Neuropsychopharmacology 2015; 41: 832–846.
Gassen NC, Fries GR, Zannas AS, Hartmann J, Zschocke J, Hafner K et al. Chaperoning epigenetics: FKBP51 decreases the activity of DNMT1 and mediates epigenetic effects of the antidepressant paroxetine. Sci Signal 2015; 8: ra119.
Yang X, Ewald ER, Huo Y, Tamashiro KL, Salvatori R, Sawa A et al. Glucocorticoid-induced loss of DNA methylation in non-neuronal cells and potential involvement of DNMT1 in epigenetic regulation of Fkbp5. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2012; 420: 570–575.
Benoit JD, Rakic P, Frick KM . Prenatal stress induces spatial memory deficits and epigenetic changes in the hippocampus indicative of heterochromatin formation and reduced gene expression. Behav Brain Res 2015; 281: 1–8.
Dong E, Dzitoyeva SG, Matrisciano F, Tueting P, Grayson DR, Guidotti A . Brain-derived neurotrophic factor epigenetic modifications associated with schizophrenia-like phenotype induced by prenatal stress in mice. Biol Psychiatry 2015; 77: 589–596.
Zannas AS, Chrousos GP . Glucocorticoid signaling drives epigenetic and transcription factors to induce key regulators of human parturition. Sci Signal 2015; 8: fs19.
Di Stefano V, Wang B, Parobchak N, Roche N, Rosen T . RelB/p52-mediated NF-kappaB signaling alters histone acetylation to increase the abundance of corticotropin-releasing hormone in human placenta. Sci Signal 2015; 8: ra85.
Dwivedi Y, Roy B, Lugli G, Rizavi H, Zhang H, Smalheiser NR . Chronic corticosterone-mediated dysregulation of microRNA network in prefrontal cortex of rats: relevance to depression pathophysiology. Transl Psychiatry 2015; 5: e682.
Ko JY, Chuang PC, Ke HJ, Chen YS, Sun YC, Wang FS . MicroRNA-29a mitigates glucocorticoid induction of bone loss and fatty marrow by rescuing Runx2 acetylation. Bone 2015; 81: 80–88.
Ewald ER, Wand GS, Seifuddin F, Yang X, Tamashiro KL, Potash JB et al. Alterations in DNA methylation of Fkbp5 as a determinant of blood-brain correlation of glucocorticoid exposure. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2014; 44: 112–122.
Lee RS, Tamashiro KL, Yang X, Purcell RH, Harvey A, Willour VL et al. Chronic corticosterone exposure increases expression and decreases deoxyribonucleic acid methylation of Fkbp5 in mice. Endocrinology 2010; 151: 4332–4343.
Yehuda R, Daskalakis NP, Bierer LM, Bader HN, Klengel T, Holsboer F et al. Holocaust Exposure Induced Intergenerational Effects on FKBP5 Methylation. Biol Psychiatry 2015; 80: 372–380.
Montagud-Romero S, Montesinos J, Pascual M, Aguilar MA, Roger-Sanchez C, Guerri C et al. ‘Up-regulation of histone acetylation induced by social defeat mediates the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2016; 70: 39–48.
Rodgers AB, Morgan CP, Bronson SL, Revello S, Bale TL . Paternal stress exposure alters sperm microRNA content and reprograms offspring HPA stress axis regulation. J Neurosci 2013; 33: 9003–9012.
Rodgers AB, Morgan CP, Leu NA, Bale TL . Transgenerational epigenetic programming via sperm microRNA recapitulates effects of paternal stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015; 112: 13699–13704.
Mychasiuk R, Schmold N, Ilnytskyy S, Kovalchuk O, Kolb B, Gibb R . Prenatal bystander stress alters brain, behavior, and the epigenome of developing rat offspring. Dev Neurosci 2011; 33: 159–169.
Xu L, Sun Y, Gao L, Cai YY, Shi SX . Prenatal restraint stress is associated with demethylation of corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH) promoter and enhances CRH transcriptional responses to stress in adolescent rats. Neurochem Res 2014; 39: 1193–1198.
Palma-Gudiel H, Cordova-Palomera A, Eixarch E, Deuschle M, Fananas L . Maternal psychosocial stress during pregnancy alters the epigenetic signature of the glucocorticoid receptor gene promoter in their offspring: a meta-analysis. Epigenetics 2015; 10: 893–902.
Boersma GJ, Lee RS, Cordner ZA, Ewald ER, Purcell RH, Moghadam AA et al. Prenatal stress decreases Bdnf expression and increases methylation of Bdnf exon IV in rats. Epigenetics 2014; 9: 437–447.
Palacios-Garcia I, Lara-Vasquez A, Montiel JF, Diaz-Veliz GF, Sepulveda H, Utreras E et al. Prenatal stress down-regulates Reelin expression by methylation of its promoter and induces adult behavioral impairments in rats. PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0117680.
Mulligan CJ, D'Errico NC, Stees J, Hughes DA . Methylation changes at NR3C1 in newborns associate with maternal prenatal stress exposure and newborn birth weight. Epigenetics 2012; 7: 853–857.
Cao-Lei L, Massart R, Suderman MJ, Machnes Z, Elgbeili G, Laplante DP et al. DNA methylation signatures triggered by prenatal maternal stress exposure to a natural disaster: Project Ice Storm. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e107653.
Schraut KG, Jakob SB, Weidner MT, Schmitt AG, Scholz CJ, Strekalova T et al. Prenatal stress-induced programming of genome-wide promoter DNA methylation in 5-HTT-deficient mice. Transl Psychiatry 2014; 4: e473.
Winston JH, Li Q, Sarna SK . Chronic prenatal stress epigenetically modifies spinal cord BDNF expression to induce sex-specific visceral hypersensitivity in offspring. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26: 715–730.
Monteleone MC, Adrover E, Pallares ME, Antonelli MC, Frasch AC, Brocco MA . Prenatal stress changes the glycoprotein GPM6A gene expression and induces epigenetic changes in rat offspring brain. Epigenetics 2014; 9: 152–160.
Zucchi FC, Yao Y, Ward ID, Ilnytskyy Y, Olson DM, Benzies K et al. Maternal stress induces epigenetic signatures of psychiatric and neurological diseases in the offspring. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e56967.
Anier K, Malinovskaja K, Pruus K, Aonurm-Helm A, Zharkovsky A, Kalda A . Maternal separation is associated with DNA methylation and behavioural changes in adult rats. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2014; 24: 459–468.
Doherty TS, Forster A, Roth TL . Global and gene-specific DNA methylation alterations in the adolescent amygdala and hippocampus in an animal model of caregiver maltreatment. Behav Brain Res 2016; 298 (Pt A): 55–61.
Roth TL, Lubin FD, Funk AJ, Sweatt JD . Lasting epigenetic influence of early-life adversity on the BDNF gene. Biol Psychiatry 2009; 65: 760–769.
Weaver IC, Cervoni N, Champagne FA, D'Alessio AC, Sharma S, Seckl JR et al. Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7: 847–854.
Tyrka AR, Price LH, Marsit C, Walters OC, Carpenter LL . Childhood adversity and epigenetic modulation of the leukocyte glucocorticoid receptor: preliminary findings in healthy adults. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e30148.
Houtepen LC, Vinkers CH, Carrillo-Roa T, Hiemstra M, van Lier PA, Meeus W et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation levels and altered cortisol stress reactivity following childhood trauma in humans. Nat Commun 2016; 7: 10967.
Ouellet-Morin I, Wong CC, Danese A, Pariante CM, Papadopoulos AS, Mill J et al. Increased serotonin transporter gene (SERT) DNA methylation is associated with bullying victimization and blunted cortisol response to stress in childhood: a longitudinal study of discordant monozygotic twins. Psychol Med 2013; 43: 1813–1823.
Unternaehrer E, Luers P, Mill J, Dempster E, Meyer AH, Staehli S et al. Dynamic changes in DNA methylation of stress-associated genes (OXTR, BDNF ) after acute psychosocial stress. Transl Psychiatry 2012; 2: e150.
van der Knaap LJ, Riese H, Hudziak JJ, Verbiest MM, Verhulst FC, Oldehinkel AJ et al. Glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1) methylation following stressful events between birth and adolescence. The TRAILS study. Transl Psychiatry 2014; 4: e381.
Murgatroyd C, Patchev AV, Wu Y, Micale V, Bockmuhl Y, Fischer D et al. Dynamic DNA methylation programs persistent adverse effects of early-life stress. Nat Neurosci 2009; 12: 1559–1566.
van der Knaap LJ, Riese H, Hudziak JJ, Verbiest MM, Verhulst FC, Oldehinkel AJ et al. Adverse life events and allele-specific methylation of the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) in adolescents: the TRAILS study. Psychosom Med 2015; 77: 246–255.
McGowan PO, Sasaki A, D'Alessio AC, Dymov S, Labonte B, Szyf M et al. Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse. Nat Neurosci 2009; 12: 342–348.
Perroud N, Paoloni-Giacobino A, Prada P, Olie E, Salzmann A, Nicastro R et al. Increased methylation of glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1) in adults with a history of childhood maltreatment: a link with the severity and type of trauma. Transl Psychiatry 2011; 1: e59.
Tyrka AR, Ridout KK, Parade SH, Paquette A, Marsit CJ, Seifer R . Childhood maltreatment and methylation of FK506 binding protein 5 gene (FKBP5). Dev Psychopathol 2015; 27 (4 Pt 2): 1637–1645.
Kao GS, Cheng LY, Chen LH, Tzeng WY, Cherng CG, Su CC et al. Neonatal isolation decreases cued fear conditioning and frontal cortical histone 3 lysine 9 methylation in adult female rats. Eur J Pharmacol 2012; 697: 65–72.
Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang L, Bai M, Zhang X, Zhu X . Dopamine receptor D2 and associated microRNAs are involved in stress susceptibility and resistance to escitalopram treatment. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2015; 18: pii: pyv025.
Uchida S, Hara K, Kobayashi A, Otsuki K, Yamagata H, Hobara T et al. Epigenetic status of Gdnf in the ventral striatum determines susceptibility and adaptation to daily stressful events. Neuron 2011; 69: 359–372.
Roth TL, Zoladz PR, Sweatt JD, Diamond DM . Epigenetic modification of hippocampal Bdnf DNA in adult rats in an animal model of post-traumatic stress disorder. J Psychiatr Res 2011; 45: 919–926.
Witzmann SR, Turner JD, Meriaux SB, Meijer OC, Muller CP . Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor promoter 1 in adult rats. Epigenetics 2012; 7: 1290–1301.
Tran L, Chaloner A, Sawalha AH, Greenwood Van-Meerveld B . Importance of epigenetic mechanisms in visceral pain induced by chronic water avoidance stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2013; 38: 898–906.
Le Francois B, Soo J, Millar AM, Daigle M, Le Guisquet AM, Leman S et al. Chronic mild stress and antidepressant treatment alter 5-HT1A receptor expression by modifying DNA methylation of a conserved Sp4 site. Neurobiol Dis 2015; 82: 332–341.
Lam LL, Emberly E, Fraser HB, Neumann SM, Chen E, Miller GE et al. Factors underlying variable DNA methylation in a human community cohort. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109 (Suppl 2): 17253–17260.
Alasaari JS, Lagus M, Ollila HM, Toivola A, Kivimaki M, Vahtera J et al. Environmental stress affects DNA methylation of a CpG rich promoter region of serotonin transporter gene in a nurse cohort. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e45813.
Elliott E, Ezra-Nevo G, Regev L, Neufeld-Cohen A, Chen A . Resilience to social stress coincides with functional DNA methylation of the Crf gene in adult mice. Nat Neurosci 2010; 13: 1351–1353.
Ursini G, Bollati V, Fazio L, Porcelli A, Iacovelli L, Catalani A et al. Stress-related methylation of the catechol-O-methyltransferase Val 158 allele predicts human prefrontal cognition and activity. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 6692–6698.
Erburu M, Munoz-Cobo I, Dominguez-Andres J, Beltran E, Suzuki T, Mai A et al. Chronic stress and antidepressant induced changes in Hdac5 and Sirt2 affect synaptic plasticity. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2015; 25: 2036–2048.
Renthal W, Maze I, Krishnan V, Covington HE 3rd, Xiao G, Kumar A et al. Histone deacetylase 5 epigenetically controls behavioral adaptations to chronic emotional stimuli. Neuron 2007; 56: 517–529.
Nasca C, Zelli D, Bigio B, Piccinin S, Scaccianoce S, Nistico R et al. Stress dynamically regulates behavior and glutamatergic gene expression in hippocampus by opening a window of epigenetic plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015; 112: 14960–14965.
Volk N, Paul ED, Haramati S, Eitan C, Fields BK, Zwang R et al. MicroRNA-19b associates with Ago2 in the amygdala following chronic stress and regulates the adrenergic receptor beta 1. J Neurosci 2014; 34: 15070–15082.
Volk N, Pape JC, Engel M, Zannas AS, Cattane N, Cattaneo A et al. Amygdalar MicroRNA-15a Is Essential for Coping with Chronic Stress. Cell Rep 2016; 17: 1882–1891.
Sun H, Damez-Werno DM, Scobie KN, Shao NY, Dias C, Rabkin J et al. ACF chromatin-remodeling complex mediates stress-induced depressive-like behavior. Nat Med 2015; 21: 1146–1153.
Horvath S . DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol 2013; 14: R115.
Neidl R, Schneider A, Bousiges O, Majchrzak M, Barbelivien A, de Vasconcelos AP et al. Late-life environmental enrichment induces acetylation events and nuclear factor kappaB-dependent regulations in the hippocampus of aged rats showing improved plasticity and learning. J Neurosci 2016; 36: 4351–4361.
Faulk C, Dolinoy DC . Timing is everything: the when and how of environmentally induced changes in the epigenome of animals. Epigenetics 2011; 6: 791–797.
Tobi EW, Slieker RC, Stein AD, Suchiman HE, Slagboom PE, van Zwet EW et al. Early gestation as the critical time-window for changes in the prenatal environment to affect the adult human blood methylome. Int J Epidemiol 2015; 44: 1211–1223.
Needham BL, Smith JA, Zhao W, Wang X, Mukherjee B, Kardia SL et al. Life course socioeconomic status and DNA methylation in genes related to stress reactivity and inflammation: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Epigenetics 2015; 10: 958–969.
John S, Sabo PJ, Johnson TA, Sung MH, Biddie SC, Lightman SL et al. Interaction of the glucocorticoid receptor with the chromatin landscape. Mol Cell 2008; 29: 611–624.
Lightman SL . The neuroendocrinology of stress: a never ending story. J Neuroendocrinol 2008; 20: 880–884.
Gitau R, Cameron A, Fisk NM, Glover V . Fetal exposure to maternal cortisol. Lancet 1998; 352: 707–708.
Benayoun BA, Pollina EA, Brunet A . Epigenetic regulation of ageing: linking environmental inputs to genomic stability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2015; 16: 593–610.
Shalev I, Moffitt TE, Sugden K, Williams B, Houts RM, Danese A et al. Exposure to violence during childhood is associated with telomere erosion from 5 to 10 years of age: a longitudinal study. Mol Psychiatry 2013; 18: 576–581.
Epel ES, Blackburn EH, Lin J, Dhabhar FS, Adler NE, Morrow JD et al. Accelerated telomere shortening in response to life stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 17312–17315.
Zhang Z, Deng C, Lu Q, Richardson B . Age-dependent DNA methylation changes in the ITGAL (CD11a) promoter. Mech Ageing Dev 2002; 123: 1257–1268.
Li Y, Liu Y, Strickland FM, Richardson B . Age-dependent decreases in DNA methyltransferase levels and low transmethylation micronutrient levels synergize to promote overexpression of genes implicated in autoimmunity and acute coronary syndromes. Exp Gerontol 2010; 45: 312–322.
Lee RS, Tamashiro KL, Yang X, Purcell RH, Huo Y, Rongione M et al. A measure of glucocorticoid load provided by DNA methylation of Fkbp5 in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2011; 218: 303–312.
Hunter RG, McCarthy KJ, Milne TA, Pfaff DW, McEwen BS . Regulation of hippocampal H3 histone methylation by acute and chronic stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 20912–20917.
Ferland CL, Harris EP, Lam M, Schrader LA . Facilitation of the HPA axis to a novel acute stress following chronic stress exposure modulates histone acetylation and the ERK/MAPK pathway in the dentate gyrus of male rats. Endocrinology 2014; 155: 2942–2952.
Datson NA, van den Oever JM, Korobko OB, Magarinos AM, de Kloet ER, McEwen BS . Previous history of chronic stress changes the transcriptional response to glucocorticoid challenge in the dentate gyrus region of the male rat hippocampus. Endocrinology 2013; 154: 3261–3272.
Jin B, Li Y, Robertson KD . DNA methylation: superior or subordinate in the epigenetic hierarchy? Genes Cancer 2011; 2: 607–617.
Simpson JA, Griskevicius V, Kuo SI, Sung S, Collins WA . Evolution, stress, and sensitive periods: the influence of unpredictability in early versus late childhood on sex and risky behavior. Dev Psychol 2012; 48: 674–686.
Heim C, Binder EB . Current research trends in early life stress and depression: review of human studies on sensitive periods, gene-environment interactions, and epigenetics. Exp Neurol 2012; 233: 102–111.
Shevlin M, Houston JE, Dorahy MJ, Adamson G . Cumulative traumas and psychosis: an analysis of the national comorbidity survey and the British Psychiatric Morbidity Survey. Schizophr Bull 2008; 34: 193–199.
Myers HF, Wyatt GE, Ullman JB, Loeb TB, Chin D, Prause N et al. Cumulative burden of lifetime adversities: Trauma and mental health in low-SES African Americans and Latino/as. Psychol Trauma 2015; 7: 243–251.
Vinkers CH, Joels M, Milaneschi Y, Kahn RS, Penninx BW, Boks MP . Stress exposure across the life span cumulatively increases depression risk and is moderated by neuroticism. Depress Anxiety 2014; 31: 737–745.
Kaltsas G, Zannas AS, Chrousos GP Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and cardiovascular disease. In: Hjemdahl P, Rosengren A, Steptoe A (ed.). Stress and Cardiovascular Disease. Springer: London, UK, 2012.
Kendler KS, Karkowski LM, Prescott CA . Causal relationship between stressful life events and the onset of major depression. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 837–841.
Zannas AS, McQuoid DR, Steffens DC, Chrousos GP, Taylor WD . Stressful life events, perceived stress, and 12-month course of geriatric depression: direct effects and moderation by the 5-HTTLPR and COMT Val158Met polymorphisms. Stress 2012; 15: 425–434.
Peavy GM, Salmon DP, Jacobson MW, Hervey A, Gamst AC, Wolfson T et al. Effects of chronic stress on memory decline in cognitively normal and mildly impaired older adults. Am J Psychiatry 2009; 166: 1384–1391.
Eskelinen M, Ollonen P . Life stress and losses and deficit in adulthood as breast cancer risk factor: a prospective case-control study in Kuopio, Finland. In Vivo 2010; 24: 899–904.
Chandola T, Brunner E, Marmot M . Chronic stress at work and the metabolic syndrome: prospective study. BMJ 2006; 332: 521–525.
Wong HP, Li ZJ, Shin VY, Tai EK, Wu WK, Yu L et al. Effects of cigarette smoking and restraint stress on human colon tumor growth in mice. Digestion 2009; 80: 209–214.
Acknowledgements
We apologize to those whose work could not be cited due to space constraints. ASZ is currently supported by a Marie-Sklodowska Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020 grant number 653240).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
PowerPoint slides
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zannas, A., Chrousos, G. Epigenetic programming by stress and glucocorticoids along the human lifespan. Mol Psychiatry 22, 640–646 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.35
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.35
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
The dynamic landscape of chromatin accessibility and active regulatory elements in the mediobasal hypothalamus influences the seasonal activation of the reproductive axis in the male quail under long light exposure
BMC Genomics (2024)
-
Effects of improved on-farm crop storage on DNA methylation of mothers and their infants: evidence from a randomized controlled trial in Kenya
Clinical Epigenetics (2024)
-
Dissecting the networks underlying diverse brain disorders after prenatal glucocorticoid overexposure
Archives of Toxicology (2024)
-
A multiomic atlas of the aging hippocampus reveals molecular changes in response to environmental enrichment
Nature Communications (2024)
-
DNA methylation age acceleration is associated with risk of diabetes complications
Communications Medicine (2023)