Abstract
A large number of small mammals practice cecotrophy, i.e. ingesting a certain fraction of their own faeces typically termed ‘cecotrophs’. This behaviour is generally thought to limit metabolic losses of nitrogen, because a colonic separation mechanism (CSM) selectively accretes fine, nitrogen-rich particles (such as microbes) in the cecotrophs. Two types of CSM have been described, a wash-back CSM (in lagomorphs) where fluids wash through the colonic digesta in a retrograde manner into the caecum, resulting in a selectively prolonged solute marker retention in passage studies; and a mucus-trap CSM (in hystricomorph rodents) where microbes are trapped in mucus-filled anatomical structures in the colon mucosa (grooves/furrows/folds). In the mucus-trap CSM, no selective retention of any passage marker occurs. How the CSM operates in muroid rodents is not well explored, but both mucus-filled anatomical structures and a moderate degree of selective solute marker retention have been reported in the literature. Here we demonstrate selective solute marker retention in two muroid, arvicoline rodent species (field voles Microtus agrestis, body mass 28.6±7.4g, and steppe lemming Lagurus lagurus, 19.8±2.0g) on a pelleted high-fibre diet, where a solute marker was retained 20-55% longer than a particle marker (with mean retention times of 5.6±0.5 vs. 4.8±0.9 and 5.0±1.5 vs. 3.3±0.9h, respectively). The animals achieved an apparent organic matter digestibility similar to that of much larger herbivores on diets of similar fibre content. In addition to a selective feeding behaviour and a high relative food intake, a digestive physiology that includes coprophagy, and a CSM using both mucus-trap and wash-back effects, are characteristic for herbivorous arvicoline rodents. The relative contributions of the two CSM components - whether they have additive or complementary effects - remain to be explored.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
AOAC, 1995. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington VA.
Behmann, H., 1973. Vergleichend-und funktionell-anatomische Untersuchungen am Caecum und Colon myomorpher Nagetiere. Z. wiss. Zool. 186, 173–294.
Bezzobs, T., Sanson, G., 1997. The effects of plant and tooth structure on intake and digestibility in two small mammalian herbivores. Physiol. Zool. 70, 338–351.
Björnhag, G., Snipes, R.L., 1999. Colonic spearation mechanism in lagomorph and rodent species-a comparison. Zoosyst. Evol. 75, 275–281.
Björnhag, G., Sperber, I., 1977. Transport of various food components through the digestive tract of turkeys, geese and Guinea fowl. Swed. J. Agric. Res. 7, 57–66.
Björnhag, G., 1972. Separation and delay of contents in the rabbit colon. Swed. J. Agric. Res. 2, 125–136.
Björnhag, G., 1994. Adaptations in the large intestine allowing small animals to eat fibrous foods. In: Chivers, Langer (Eds.), The Digestive System of Mammals: Food, Form and Function. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 287–312.
Cameron, K.M., Speakman, J.R., 2010. The extent and function of ‘food grinding’ in the laboratory mouse (Mus musculus). Lab. Anim. 44, 298–304.
Caraba˜no, R., Fraga, M.J., Santoma, G., de Blas, J.C., 1988. Effect of diet on composition of cecal contents and on excretion and composition of soft and hard feces of rabbits. J. Anim. Sci. 66, 901–910.
Chilcott, M.J., Hume, I.D., 1985. Coprophagy and selective retention of fluid digesta: their role in the nutrition of the common ringtail possum (Pseudocheirus peregrinus). Aust. J. Zool. 33, 1–15.
Clauss, M., Besselmann, D., Schwarm, A., Ortmann, S., Hatt, J.-M., 2007. Demonstrating coprophagy with passage markers? The example of the plains viscacha (Lagostomus maximus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 147, 453–459.
Clauss, M., Steuer, P., Müller, D.W.H., Codron, D., Hummel, J., 2013. Herbivory and body size: allometries of diet quality and gastrointestinal physiology, and implications for herbivore ecology and dinosaur gigantism. PLoS One 8, e68714.
Clauss, M., Schiele, K., Ortmann, S., Fritz, J., Codron, D., Hummel, J., Kienzle, E., 2014. The effect of very low food intake on digestive physiology and forage digestibility in horses. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 98, 107–118.
Cork, S.J., Warner, A.C.I., 1983. The passage of digesta markers through the gut of a foliovorous marsupial, the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). J. Comp. Physiol. B 152, 43–51.
Cork, S.J., Hume, I.D., Faichney, G.J., 1999. Digestive strategies of nonruminant herbivores: the role of the hindgut. In: Jung, H.J.G., Fahey, G.C. (Eds.), Nutritional Ecology of Herbivores. American Society of Animal Science, Savoy IL, pp. 210–260.
Cork, S., 1994. Digestive constraints on dietary scope in small and moderately-small mammals: how much do we really understand? In: Chivers, D.J., Langer, P. (Eds.), The Digestive System of Mammals: Food, Form and Function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 337–369.
Cranford, J.A., Johnson, E.O., 1989. Effects of coprophagy and diet quality on two microtine rodents (Microtus pennsylvanicus and Microtus pinetorum). J. Mammal. 70, 494–502.
Demment, M.W., Van Soest, P.J., 1985. A nutritional explanation for body size patterns of ruminant and nonruminant herbivores. Am. Nat. 125, 641–672.
Fekete, S., Bokori, J., 1985. The effect of the fiber and protein level of the ration upon the cecotrophy of rabbit. J. Appl. Rabbit Res. 8, 68–71.
Foley, W.J., Cork, S.J., 1992. Use of fibrous diets by small herbivores: how far can the rules be ‘bent’? Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, 159–162.
Foley, W.J., Hume, I.D., 1987. Passage of digesta markers in two species of arboreal foliovorous marsupials - the greater glider (Petauroides volans) and the brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). Physiol. Zool. 60, 103–113.
Franz, R., Kreuzer, M., Hummel, J., Hatt, J.-M., Clauss, M., 2011. Intake, selection, digesta retention, digestion and gut fill of two coprophageous species, rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus), on a hay-only diet. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 95, 564–570.
Frei, S., Ortmann, S., Reutlinger, C., Kreuzer, M., Hatt, J.-M., Clauss, M., 2015. Comparative digesta retention patterns in ratites. Auk Ornithol. Adv. 132, 119–131.
Frei, S., Ortmann, S., Kreuzer, M., Hatt, J.-M., Clauss, M., 2017. Digesta retention patterns in geese (Anser anser) and turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) and deduced function of avian caeca. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 204, 219–227.
Fritz, J., Hummel, J., Kienzle, E., Arnold, C., Nunn, C., Clauss, M., 2009. Comparative chewing efficiency in mammalian herbivores. Oikos 118, 1623–1632.
García, J., De Blas, J.C., Caraba˜no, R., Garcia, P., 1995. Effect of type of lucerne hay on caecal fermentation and nitrogen contribution through caecotrophy in rabbits. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 35, 267–275.
Gasaway, W.C., Holleman, D.F., White, R.G., 1975. Flow of digesta in the intestine and cecum of the rock ptarmigan. Condor 77, 467–474.
Gorgas, M., 1966. Vergleichend-anatomische Untersuchungen am Magen-Darm-Kanal der Sciuromorpha, Hystricomorpha und Caviomorpha (Rodentia). Z. wiss. Zool. 175, 237–404.
Hörnicke, H., Björnhag, G., 1980. Coprophagy and related strategies for digesta utilization. In: Ruckebusch, Y., Thivent, P. (Eds.), Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants. MTP Press, Lancaster, pp. 707–730.
Hagen, K.B., Besselmann, D., Cyrus-Eulenberger, U., Vendl, C., Ortmann, S., Zingg, R., Kienzle, E., Kreuzer, M., Hatt, J.-M., Clauss, M., 2015a. Digestive physiology of the plains viscacha (Lagostomus maximus), a large herbivorous hystricomorph rodent. Zoo Biol. 34, 345–359.
Hagen, K.B., Tschudin, A., Liesegang, A., Hatt, J.-M., Clauss, M., 2015b. Organic matter and macromineral digestibility in domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) as compared to other hindgut fermenters. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 99, 1197–1209.
Hagen, K.B., Dittmann, M.T., Ortmann, S., Kreuzer, M., Hatt, J.-M., Clauss, M., 2016. Retention of solute and particle markers in the digestive tract of chinchillas (Chinchilla laniger). J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 100, 801–806.
Holleman, D.F., White, R.G., 1989. Determination of digesta fill and passage rate from non absorbed particulate phase markers using the single dosing method. Can. J. Zool. 67, 488–494.
Holtenius, K., Björnhag, G., 1985. The colonic separation mechanism in the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) and the chinchilla (Chinchilla laniger). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 82, 537–542.
Hume, I.D., Sakaguchi, E., 1991. Patterns of digesta flow and digestion in foregut and hindgut fermenters. In: Tsuda, T., Saaski, Y., Kawashima, R. (Eds.), Physiological Aspects of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 427–451.
Hume, I.D., Morgan, K.R., Kenagy, G.J., 1993. Digesta retention and digestive performance in sciurid and microtine rodents: effects of hindgut morphology and body size. Physiol. Zool. 66, 396–411.
Hummel, J., Scheurich, F., Ortmann, S., Crompton, L.A., Gerken, M., Clauss, M., 2017. Comparative selective retention of particle size classes in the gastrointestinal tract of ponies and goats. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12763.
Justice, K.E., Smith, F.A., 1992. A model of dietary fiber utilization by small mammalian herbivores, with empirical results for Neotoma. Am. Nat. 139, 398–416.
Karasov, W.H., Martínez del Rio, C., 2007. Physiological Ecology: How Animals Process Energy, Nutrients, and Toxins. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Kenagy, G.J., Hoyt, D.F., 1980. Reingestion of feces in rodents and its daily rhythmicity. Oecologia 44, 403–409.
Koteja, P., Carter, P.A., Swallow, J.G., Garland, T., 2003. Food wasting by house mice: variation among individuals, families, and genetic lines. Physiol. Behav. 80, 375–383.
Krockenberger, A.K., Hume, I.D., 2007. A flexible digestive strategy accomodates the nutritional demands of reproduction in a free-living folivore, the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). Funct. Ecol. 21, 748–756.
Lee, W.B., Houston, D.C., 1993. The role of coprophagy in digestion in voles (Microtus agrestis and Clethrionomys glareolus). Funct. Ecol. 7, 427–432.
Lee, W.B., 1993. Tooth wear patterns in voles (Microtus agrestis and Clethrionomys glareolus) and efficiency of dentition in preparing food for digestion. J. Zool. 231, 301–309.
Levey, D., Martínez del Rio, C., 1999. Test, rejection and reformulation of a chemical reactor-based model of gut function in a fruit-eating bird. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 72, 369–383.
Liu, Q.S., Li, J.Y., Wang, D.H., 2007. Ultradian rhythms and the nutritional importance of caecotrophy in captive Brandt’s voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii). J. Comp. Physiol. B 177, 423–432.
Lord, R.D., 1991. Twenty-four-hour activity and coprophagy by capybaras (Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris). Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 26, 113–120.
Müller, D.W.H., Codron, D., Meloro, C., Munn, A., Schwarm, A., Hummel, J., Clauss, M., 2013. Assessing the Jarman-Bell Principle: scaling of intake, digestibility, retention time and gut fill with body mass in mammalian herbivores. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 164, 129–140.
Martino, N.S., Zenuto, R.R., Busch, C., 2007. Nutritional responses to different diet quality in the subterranean rodent Ctenomys talarum (tuco-tucos). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 147, 974–982.
Matsuda, I., Sha, J.C.M., Ortmann, S., Schwarm, A., Grandl, F., Caton, J., Jens, W., Kreuzer, M., Marlena, D., Hagen, K.B., Clauss, M., 2015. Excretion patterns of solute and different-sized particle passage markers in foregut-fermenting proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus) do not indicate an adaptation for rumination. Physiol. Behav. 149, 45–52.
Mertens, D.R., 2003. Challenges in measuring insoluble dietary fiber. J. Anim. Sci. 81, 3233–3249.
Meyer, K., Hummel, J., Clauss, M., 2010. The relationship between forage cell wall content and voluntary food intake in mammalian herbivores. Mammal Rev. 40, 221–245.
Munn, A., Stewart, M., Price, E., Peilon, A., Savage, T., Van Ekris, I., Clauss, M., 2015. Comparison of gut fill in sheep (Ovis aries) measured by intake, digestibility, and digesta retention compared with measurements at harvest. Can. J. Zool. 93, 747–753.
Naumova, E.I., Zharova, G.K., Chistova, T.Y., Varshavskii, A.A., Ivlev, Y.F., 2017. Concentration and size distribution of plant fiber in the digestive tract of muroid rodents. Biology Bulletin 44, 517–523.
Nogueira-Filho, S.L.G., Mendes, A., Kowalski Tavares, E.F., da Cunha Nogueira, S.S., 2013. Cecotrophy behavior and use of urea as non-protein nitrogen (NPN) source for capybara (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris). Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 45, 1703–1708.
Pei, Y.-X., Wang, D.-H., Hume, I., 2001a. Selective digesta retention and coprophagy in Brandt’s vole (Microtus brandti). J. Comp. Physiol. B 171, 457–464.
Pei, Y.X., Wang, D.H., Hume, I.D., 2001b. Effects of dietary fibre on digesta passage, nutrient digestibility, and gastrointestinal tract morphology in the granivorous Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 74, 742–749.
Rübsamen, K., Hume, I.D., Foley, W.J., Rübsamen, U., 1983. Regional differences in electrolyte, short-chain fatty acid and water absorption in the hindgut of two species of arboreal marsupilas. Pflügers Archiv 399, 68–73.
Robbins, C.T., 1993. Wildlife Feeding and Nutrition. Academic Press, San Diego.
Sakaguchi, E., Nabata, A., 1992. Comparison of fibre digestion and digesta retention time between nutrias (Myocaster coypus) and guinea-pigs (Cavia porcellus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 103, 601–604.
Sakaguchi, E., Ohmura, S., 1992. Fibre digestion and digesta retention time in guinea-pigs (Cavia porcellus), degus (Octodon degus) and leaf-eared mice (Phyllotis darwini). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 103, 787–791.
Sakaguchi, E., Itoh, H., Uchida, S., Horigome, T., 1987. Comparison of fibre digestion and digesta retention time between rabbits guinea-pigs, rats and hamsters. Br. J. Nutr. 58, 149–158.
Sakaguchi, E., Nippashi, K., Endoh, G., 1992. Digesta retention and fibre digestion in maras (Dolichotis patagonum) and guinea-pigs. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 101, 867–870.
Smith, M., 1979. Behaviour of the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) in captivity. 2. Parental and infantile behaviour. Wildl. Res. 6, 131–140.
Smith, F.A., 1995. Scaling of digestive efficiency with body mass in Neotoma. Funct. Ecol. 9, 299–305.
Snipes, R.L., Hörnicke, H., Björnhag, G., Stahl, W., 1988. Regional differences in hindgut structure and function in the nutria (Myocastor coypus). Cell Tissue Res. 252, 435–447.
Sperber, I., Björnhag, G., Ridderstråle, Y., 1983. Function of proximal colon in lemming and rat. Swed. J. Agric. Res. 13, 243–256.
Staaland, H., 1975. Absorption of sodium, potassium and water in the colon of the Norway lemming (Lemmus lemmus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 52, 77–80.
Steuer, P., Südekum, K.-H., Tütken, T., Müller, D.W.H., Kaandorp, J., Bucher, M., Clauss, M., Hummel, J., 2014. Does body mass convey a digestive advantage for large herbivores? Funct. Ecol. 28, 1127–1134.
Takahashi, T., Sakaguchi, E., 1998. Behaviors and nutritional importance of coprophagy in captive adult and young nutrias (Myocastor coypus). J. Comp. Physiol. B 168, 281–288.
Takahashi, T., Sakaguchi, E., 2000. Role of the furrow of the proximal colon in the production of soft and hard feces in nutrias (Myocastor coypus). J. Comp. Physiol. B 170, 531–535.
Takahashi, T., Sakaguchi, E., 2006. Transport of bacteria across and along the large intestinal lumen of guinea pigs. J. Comp. Physiol. B 176, 173–178.
Thielemans, M.F., Francois, E., Bodart, C., Thewis, A., 1978. Mesure du transit gastrointestinal chez le porc a l’aide des radiolanthanides: Comparaison avec le mouton. Ann. Biol. Anim. Biochim. Biophys. 18, 237–247.
Udén, P., Colucci, P.E., Van Soest, P.J., 1980. Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta: rate of passage studies. J. Sci. Food Agric. 31, 625–632.
Van Soest, P.J., 1982. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. O & B Books Inc., Corvallis, OR.
Young Owl, M., Batzli, G.O., 1998. The integrated processing response of voles to fibre content of natural diets. Funct. Ecol. 12, 4–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hagen, K.B., Müller, D.W.H., Ortmann, S. et al. Digesta kinetics in two arvicoline rodents, the field vole (Microtus agrestis) and the steppe lemming (Lagurus lagurus). Mamm Biol 89, 71–78 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2018.01.003
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2018.01.003