Abstract
Previous studies on chordwise flexibility of flexible wings generally relied on simplified two-dimensional (2D) models. In the present study, we constructed a simplified three-dimensional (3D) model and identified the role of the chordwise flexibility in full flapping motion. This paper includes two parts, the first part discusses the aerodynamic effects of the chordwise flexibility in a typical hovering-flight case; the second part introduces a parametric study of four key parameters. The primary findings are as follows. Flexibility generally degrades the lift performance of the flexible wings. However, in two special cases, i.e. when stroke amplitude is low or pitch rotation is delayed, the flexible wings outperform their rigid counterparts in lift generation. Moreover, flexibility reduces the power consumption of the flexible wings. A wing with small flexibility generally achieves a marginally higher flapping efficiency than its rigid counterpart. Furthermore, reducing stroke amplitude can effectively improve the lift performance of the very flexible wings. Aerodynamic performances of the flexible wings are not as sensitive as the rigid wing to phase difference and mid-stroke angle of attack. The effects of Re are the same for the flexible and rigid wings.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ellington C P, van den Berg C, Willmott A P, Thomas A L R. Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature, 1996, 384, 626–630.
Dickinson M H, Lehman F O, Sane S P. Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science, 1999, 284, 1954–1960.
Sane S P, Dickinson M H. The control of flight force by a flapping wing: Lift and drag production. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2001, 204, 2607–2626.
Usherwood J R, Ellington C P. The aerodynamics of revolving wings. I. Model hawkmoth wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2002, 205, 1547–1564.
Usherwood J R, Ellington C P. The aerodynamics of revolving wings. II. Propeller force coefficients from mayfly to quail. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2002, 205, 1565–1576.
Sun M, Tang J. Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2002, 205, 55–70.
Wang Z J, Birch J M, Dickinson M H. Unsteady forces and flows in flow Reynolds number hovering flight: Two-dimensional computational vs robotic wing experiments. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2004, 207, 269–283.
Ellington C P. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. III. Kinematics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 1984, 305, 41–78.
Ennos A R. The kinematics and aerodynamics of the free flight of some Diptera. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1989, 142, 49–85.
Walker S M, Thomas A L R, Taylor G K. Deformable wing kinematics in free-flying hoverflies. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2009, 7, 131–142.
Dudley R. The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution, Princeton University Press, 2000.
Wootton R J, Herbert R C, Young P G, Evans K E. Approaches to the structural modelling of insect wings. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 2003, 358, 1577–1587.
Nakata T, Liu H. Aerodynamic performance of a hovering hawkmoth with flexible wings: A computational approach. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2012, 279, 722–731.
Tian F B, Dai H, Luo H, Doyle J F, Rousseau B. Fluid-structure interaction involving large deformations: 3D simulations and applications to biological systems. Journal of Computational Physics, 2014, 258, 451–469.
Combes S A, Daniel T L. Flexural stiffness in insect wings: Effects of wing venation and stiffness distribution on passive bending. American Entomologist, 2005, 51, 42–44.
Du G, Sun M. Effects of wing deformation on aerodynamic forces in hovering hoverflies. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2010, 213, 2273–2283.
Zhao L, Huang Q, Deng X, Sane S P. Aerodynamic effects of flexibility in flapping wings. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2010, 7, 485–497.
Tanaka H, Whitney J P, Wood R J. Effect of flexural and torsional wing flexibility on lift generation in hoverfly flight. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 2011, 51, 142–150.
Eldredge J D, Toomey J, Medina A. On the roles of chord-wise flexibility in a flapping wing with hovering kinematics. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 659, 94–115.
Vanella M, Fitzgerald T, Preidikman S, Balaras E, Balachandran B. Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2009, 212, 95–105.
Yin B, Luo H. Effect of wing inertia on hovering performance of flexible flapping wings. Physics of Fluids, 2010, 22, 111902.
Sun M, Tang J. Lift and power requirements of hovering flight in Drosophila virilis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2002, 205, 2413–2427.
Sun M, Xiong Y. Dynamic flight stability of a hovering bumblebee. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2005, 208, 447–459.
Lan S L, Sun M. Aerodynamic properties of a wing performing unsteady rotational motions at low Reynolds number. Acta mechanica, 2001, 149, 135–147.
Fry S N, Sayaman R, Dickinson M H. The aerodynamics of free-flight maneuvers in Drosophila. Science, 2003, 300, 495–498.
Wu J H, Sun M. Unsteady aerodynamic forces of a flapping wing. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2004, 207, 1137–1150.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, X., Lan, S. Effects of chordwise flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a 3D flapping wing. J Bionic Eng 12, 432–442 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60134-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60134-7