Abstract
Urbanization and industrialization in this modern time actually cause less availability of daily based water. In searching of a preferable solution to overcome this critical problem, waste water treatment seems to be considered as a much valuable option for reusing water. For this, sewage water treatment plants (STPs) are widely used. But this solution is actually ironical, as STP treatment causes hazardous damage to the environment in treating waste water. This system needs lots of harmful chemicals, high energy, and high build-up to operate the process. But a newly considered technology has come to counteract all these problems of STPs and the method is ‘Vermifiltration’. In this technique, earthworms are used to treat waste water. Earthworm’s body acts as biofilter and it can reduce higher percentage of BOD, COD, TSS from the waste water compared to the STPs. Earthworms eat up the sewage, making them treated, neutralized, and non-harmful and finally excrete them with several useful microorganisms. The symbiotic activity between earthworms and microorganisms works to filter the waste water. This method is completely odour less and harmless. No sludge is formed. With having all these characteristics, vermifiltration becomes much better option for the environment. In this review, the method of vermifiltration, its limiting factors, utilization and future developments are properly discussed.
Highlights
-
The present review reports the mechanistic pathway of vermifiltration method.
-
An eco-friendly and reusable vermifiltration method is applicable for the treatment of wastewater.
-
Various parameters such as hydraulic loading rate, salinity rate, clogging, and sunlight have a positive impact on the efficacy of sustainable vermifiltration system.
-
Active zone of this system can remediate organics (COD, BOD), nitrate from nitrogen, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, dissolved phosphorus from several kinds of wasteeffluents.
-
The integrated vermifilter technique reduces the consumption of land and promotes reutilization of wastewater for cultivation purpose.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The increasing consumption of water and depletion of natural resources resulting from population growth and urbanization have become pressing issues that require proper resolution. The majority of the time, both urban and rural areas struggle with the issue of everyday access to clean water [1]. One of the main causes of it is poor wastewater management [2]. More than 80% of the world's wastewater flows back into the environment without being treated or reused, according to the United Nations; in some least-developed countries, the figure tops 95 percent [3]. Water use and subsequent discharge of spent water contain dangerous pollutants that will worsen the ecosystems on land and in water. The primary constituent of sewage is known as organic loadings, or such as total suspended solids (TSS), total dissolved solids (TDS), hazardous compounds, and biological and chemical oxygen demands (BOD and COD). The amount of dissolved oxygen (DO) in water is crucial to its quality. Reducing the organic load in the water is essential when sewage is released into rivers and seas. If not, aerobic bacteria in the aquatic ecosystem will use the DO to break down the organic materials. These lead to a significant decrease in DO, which has an impact on the ecosystem's normal state. Waste water from standard STPs can be handled more effectively, but the result of this treatment is a massive amount of sludge that contains harmful bacteria. In addition, it consumes more energy, costs more to maintain, and builds up and uses chemicals to carry out the cleaning process. As a result, traditional STPs fall short of the stringent disposal and discharge regulations that have been in place for the past few years [4]. There are numerous ways to align the points for improved waste water treatment outcomes. The physical and chemical approaches are among many that can be applied to accomplish the goal. Physically speaking, the process is simple and affordable, but because the pollutants cannot be entirely removed, it really has less success. However, these procedures are extremely costly. All previous techniques of treating waste water were replaced with biological treatment, which not only outperforms the others in terms of efficiency but also lessens their negative environmental effects. There are two types of biological remediation processes for waste water treatment: anaerobic systems and aerobic systems. Since 1970, these aerobic and anaerobic techniques have been used. Three steps—hydrolysis, acidogenesis, and methanogenesis—follow an organic material's biological conversion into methane and carbon dioxide throughout the anaerobic process. Aerobic mechanisms remediate biological waste by turning organic wastes into carbon dioxide and biomass. Less energy is used and less sludge is produced by anaerobic processes [5]. For high COD, this is far more successful. However, even so, it cannot be considered a reliable wastewater treatment technology because even little deviations from ideal circumstances can disrupt stabilization of the method [5]. In addition, it may take the system two to three months to possibly recover [5].
Aerobic systems have the advantage of being more vigorous than anaerobic systems [6]. Recovery time is shorter in the aerobic system than in the anaerobic system [6]. 25 to 35 °C is the ideal temperature range for this system [6]. However, in this instance, the rate of sludge generation surpasses that of the anaerobic process [6]. However, this procedure is typically not taken into consideration for high strength wastewater treatment due to its high sludge formation and increased aeration needs [6].
This can bring about a new era in waste water treatment and virtually eliminate all flaws. That is the vermifiltration method. In essence, they use their body walls to absorb organic debris, sediments, and heavy metals, which filters water [6]. The procedure does not produce any sludge that would need to be disposed of in a landfill at an additional cost. Furthermore, this procedure has no smell. This will also prevent anaerobic microbes from growing and releasing mercaptans and hydrogen sulfide. Many developing countries cannot afford the STPs' construction and maintenance costs. According to this perspective, they need more affordable choices for treating sewage water. This Vermifilter treatment system fulfills a lot of requirements. Its straightforward design, availability of basic equipment, reduced sludge generation, increased treatment capabilities, and relatively lower capital and operational expenses all contribute to its simplicity. Consequently, vermifitration technology presents a more promising avenue for addressing the issue of inadequate waste water treatment in developing nations [7].
2 Design requirements for vermifilter construction
A general structure of a vermifilter is depicted in Fig. 1. The construction and functioning of the vermifilter are crucial and must be done carefully. The hydraulic loading rate (HLR), or the rate at which wastewater interacts with the unit area of vermibed for a specific amount of time, is primarily responsible for the high removal effectiveness of a vermifilter. The length of time wastewater is in touch with the filter medium that earthworms reside in, known as the hydraulic retention time (HRT), needs to be carefully designed for optimal efficacy [6]. Only after enough time has passed for interaction to produce a competent microbial population can grow within the vermifilter. The filter medium layer's porosity, volume, and size all affect these two parameters. As a result, 3.5 to 8 h of HRT and 1.5 to 2.5 m3m−2d−1 of HLR may be determined based on the vermifilter measurement.
Additional requirement parameters include age at maturity, earthworm health, and stocking density [8]. Stocking density is the number of worms that are dispersing throughout the bed. An optimal concentration of earthworms must continually be maintained in order to encourage and enhance microbial activities [8]. The survival of earthworms and the effectiveness of wastewater treatment can be affected by environmental parameters such as pH, temperature, ammonia and sodium, as illustrated in Table 1. Various sand kinds, such as quartz or river sand, as well as gravel and glass beads are used to construct the filter section of the vermifilter [8]. The characteristics of the microbial communities that make up the complex vermi-ecosystems and the efficacy of therapy are influenced by the parameters of this layer of filter medium. Two further consequences of filter bed medium are hydraulic conductivity and wastewater retention [8].
3 Mechanism of vermifiltration
Earthworms are crucial to the vermifilter's operation because they increase aeration and hydraulic conductivity. Granulation is the method used by earthworms to break down organic particles [9, 10]. This granulation serves to boost the adsorption capacity by expanding the area of the filter bed. The process of vermifiltration involves the breakdown of sludge, wastewater, microorganisms, and biological degradation [16]. There are three easy steps to describe the vermifilter process. The vermicomposting process is used in the first step to create humus [8]. The next stage is to filter. The number of microorganisms is increased by filter medium. The burrowing is done by worms. By doing this, the surface area of the filter medium is increased, increasing the rate at which organic and inorganic pollutants are absorbed from the waste effluent. Complex bioprocesses that occur in the active layer assist in stabilizing an absorbed particle. As illustrated in Fig. 2, particles that have fully dissolved in the wastewater treatment process continue to descend. Adsorption of these particles occurs in the media matrix, whereupon they are further broken down by the symbiotic action of earthworms [17].
When the ejected casting interacts with the bedding during this process, the surface area of the vermibedding expands, increasing the sorption capacity of the bedding [18]. With the aid of calcium produced by its crop, the earthworm's alimentary canal can neutralize compounds. This helps to balance the pH, allowing the chemicals that were before unusable for further degradation to now be used by the body [19]. By generating antibiotics, earthworm mucus aids in the disease's resistance and creates an environment that is conducive to the growth of gut flora. Mucus inhibits an anaerobic environment while promoting an aerobic one, per one study [20].
4 Specific role of earthworms for pollutants remediation
Since they are poikilothermic by nature, the temperature outside has a big impact on their body temperature. The ideal temperature range for epigenic earthworm species' activity, growth, and reproduction is between 25 and 27 °C as depicted in Table 1. According to a number of studies, the earthworms Eisenia fetida, Perionyx sansibaricus, Lumbricus rubellus, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Eisenia hortensis are capable of treating wastewater at greater moisture levels [20]. The relation between microorganisms and earthworms is very interesting as earthworms harbour different kinds of microorganisms in their gut region. They normally contain 14% lipids, 14% carbs, 3% ash, and 65% protein (70–80% high quality "lysine rich protein" on a dry weight basis) [20]. Proper aeration of soil is important factor on which earthworms survive because they breathe through their skin [6] 0.29 °C is the optimum temperature and 60–75% is optimum moisture content required for their survival [21]. Earthworms can tolerate dehydration too caused by extensive water loss [21]. Mechanism of the interaction and the role of microbes in earthworm’s nutrition is still unclear needs more study and research [10, 22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. According to certain research, bacteria are eliminated as they enter the earthworm's digestive system. Although the connection between microorganisms and earthworms is crucial for maintaining the soil's fertility and structure, no observation has been made to support the idea that microbes are a part of the diet of earthworms [29]. Organic pollutants break down in the gut thanks to microbes. Examples of biological and physical modification include the addition of sugar and other chemicals, assimilation, homogenization, modification of the microfauna population, digestion, mucus production, and ammonia and urea excretion [30]. Because earthworms are bisexual creatures, their sexuality is thought to make them extremely unique and intriguing. According to certain research, earthworm populations can double at a minimum of every 60–70 days. Depending on the ideal circumstances, which include moisture content, temperature, and feeding supplies. Earthworms also possess the ability to develop continuously throughout the duration of their lives [6]. Many species of microbes are present in the earthworm cast in a large amount. Earthworms do not contain eyes or ears, but they still have some cells which are sensitive to light. This type of cells helps them to difference between light and darkness. Their bodies are also sensitive to vibrations. Sodium chloride concentration also determines proper growth of earthworms as their entire body surface is sensitive to the addition of sodium chloride. Their adaptation in this solution is slow. Touches also stimulate their activity and here adaptation is rapid. Earthworm’s prostomial region seems to be very sensitive to these stimuli and also to sucrose, glycerol and quinine [6].
In addition to organic pollutants such as nitrogenous compounds, phosphorus compounds, carbon compounds, organic acids, COD, and BOD, earthworms are important in the breakdown of complex molecules that have phenolic, aromatic, alcoholic, hydroxyl, and carbonyl groups that bind with different metal ions [31]. In their guts, earthworms create mucus and digestive enzymes that aid in the vermi bed's ability to absorb organic waste [26]. Air permeability is also preserved by the mechanism to facilitate the decomposition of organic molecules. The excretory contents provide as a full food source for microorganisms. When the operation involving the earthworm's intestines is complete, the cast is placed. The texture of the cast ages over time, revealing the aging process [30, 32].
5 Factors affecting the vermifiltration process
5.1 HRT and HLR
Hydraulic retention time (HRT) is the amount of time it takes for wastewater to pass through the earthworm-inhabited soil profile (vermifilter bed). HRT can be increased by increasing the volume of soil factors. The number of adult worms that are alive and functioning per unit area in the vermifilter (VF) bed can also affect HRT [9]. Therefore, HRT is directly proportional to the volume of soil profile and inversely proportional to the rate at which wastewater flows through the vermifilter bed. This means that HRT is inversely related to the rate at which wastewater flows through the vermifilter bed [8, 18].
Hydraulic Loading Rate (HLR) is the amount of wastewater that is applied to each unit area of soil within each time frame. The quantity of mature, live, and healthy earthworms that are present in vermibed areas is the primary determinant that determines how well HLR functions. Reduced HRT in soil is adversely correlated with hydraulic loading rates [8]. A study showed that an increase in HLRhad a negative impact on the rates of ammonium and TN elimination. For the treatment of domestic wastewater, HLRs capacities were used in a study by and as seen in Table 2, it demonstrated that less pollution was eliminated for those with higher HLRs than for those with lower HLRs. This can be the result of the excessive moisture levels or saturated bedding [47].
5.2 C/N ratio
A low supply of C and N interferes with the vermifiltration process. This deficiency may cause inappropriate microorganism development [48]. The quantity of carbon in the influent is also abundant, which promotes bacterial metabolism. The ratio of chemical oxygen demand (COD) to nitrogen has an effect on earthworm population, and it can reduce earthworm population [50]. As shown in Table 2, the synergistic action of earthworms and microorganisms at lower ratios of COD and nitrogen improves denitrification performance of a filter [49].
5.3 Vermibed formation
The environment of the vermibed also regulates critical elements involved in the development of microbial biofilms. Vermicosis in vermi ecosystems and treatment activities sustain this microbial activity and their structure [41]. Since there is very little phosphorus removed by other mechanisms in the vermifilter, inadequate phosphate removal can result in pollutant loss in the aquatic ecosystem. More surface area is available for processing and biofilm formation thanks to the porous matrix. As a result, ceramic granules and expanded clay are frequently utilized [43]. Incorporating organic materials into the soil, such as peat, plant leaves, and small stones, can help to preserve its porosity and to improve filtering in situations when solid buildups obstruct the flow of water. Because earthworms are highly sensitive to elevated levels of dangerous metals, therefore, none of these should be included in the bedding material. Because of their superior thermal insulation properties, ceramic pellets can tolerate abrupt temperature changes. A further study shows that the riverbed is one of the best suitable bedding habitats when compared to coal, glass balls, and mud balls [10, 41]. Furthermore, the choice of filter material is crucial for preserving worm vitality and averting damage [41]. The dispersion of contaminants in the wastewater is also impacted by the wormhole's height. Additionally, it has been noted that as nest depth increases, earthworm activity diminishes [43]. According to reports, the greatest amount of artificial sewage contaminants were found 40 cm below the surface of the filter bed [11]. According to a research study, changes in filter height have an impact on earthworm growth and reproduction, bacterial flora variety, COD, and TP removal rate [43]. It was suggested to take into account a height of 60 cm of vermibed in order to enhance the removal of nutrients from sewage and because earthworms develop so strongly [43, 50].
5.4 Selection of earthworm species
Eisenia fetida, Perionyx sansibaricus, Lumbicus rubellus, Eudrilus eugeniae, Eisenia hortensis, Dichogaster affinis, and Dichogaster bolaui are the most often utilized species in the vermifiltration process (Table 1). Eisenia fetida is an epigenic earthworm species that thrives in partially decomposed trash and needs high humidity and dark circumstances [17]. Due to their ability to manage larger amounts of organic matter in extremely damp settings and their capacity to devour more soil than any other earthworm species—which in turn generates more stratification with NPK content—these species are highly beneficial [15]. The vermifilter's treatment capacity is contingent upon the earthworm population. The efficiency of the treatment increases with the number of worms applied to the bed [12]. Two separate units of vermifiltration (VF1 and VF2) that are based on epigenic earthworms (Eisenia fetida and Eudrilus eugeniae) to treat household wastewater was investigated. Overall, VF1's effluent showed that E. fetida could remediate wastewater through the vermifiltration process because it was heavy in nitrate and phosphate [41].
5.5 Feeder type
Three categories are typically offered in the wastewater feeding process. They are intermittent, batch, and continuous [51]. When the microorganisms' activity of vermifiltration increases over an extended period of time, the DO level falls in the continuous mode of feeding. As a result, the reduction efficiency for nutrients and organics is decreasing, and aeration is necessary to get a higher efficiency [50]. Low occupied land area can result in high efficiency when mechanical aeration is used [52]. By partially regaining the porosity, intermittent feeding helps to revive the filter by providing a habitat for bacteria that initiate the nitrification and denitrification processes [53]. Additionally, short HRT results in a reduced system waste disposal rate.
5.6 Other factors
Setting such as pH and ammonia and sodium concentrations can affect the growth and reproduction of earthworms employed in vermifilters [7]. According to reports, the majority of earthworm species can thrive in a pH range of 5 to 9 [30]. Worms in their juvenile stage exhibit greater sensitivity to changes in pH compared to their mature stages. Additionally, it has been shown that earthworm activity and the buffering effect of vermin compost help to keep the total pH in the vicinity of neutral. There have been no reports of any harmful effects related to the ammonia concentrations on earthworms. Furthermore, variations in sodium ions may cause osmotic dysregulation, which can be harmful to earthworms. Additionally, it is noted that the presence of chloride amplifies the harmful consequences.
6 Comparative study of conventional treatment method and vermifiltration method
6.1 Sustainable energy
Vermifiltration doesn’t need any energy source other than pump for the translocation of wastewater to the vermifiltration unit.
6.2 Elimination of TSS and TDS
Organic substances in the wastewater are digested and decomposed which leads to end products which can be used efficiently in agriculture as well as horticulture. Earthworm saliva called grume softens the sludge present in wastewater, and neutralized by the oesophagus of the earthworm in the intestine with the aid of enzymes. Finally, the process of excreta is referred to as vermicomposting, which has the potential to be a potent fertilizer and soil enhancer [13].
6.3 Pathogens and microorganism eradication
Research revealed that infections are lowered below the threshold value in the vermifilter due to the symbiotic relationship between earthworms and microorganisms as well as the antibacterial activity of microflora connected to earthworms [8, 53]. The primary mechanisms by which pathogens (such as Salmonella sp., Escherichia coli, faecal Coliform, total Coliform, faecal Streptococcus, and intestinal enzymes released from worms' intestinal walls) are removed through vermifiltration include mucus secreted by roundworms and intestinal enzymes [53]. According to studies,earthworms can also acquire natural bacteria and fungi in their stomachs that create antibiotics that kill pathogens in addition to consuming pathogens found in sewage [39, 41, 54]. Additional elements that could be connected to the pathogen removal is the attachment of bacteria to the filter, which holds the germs in place while filtering occurs [41, 53]. It is possible to remove dangerous pathogenic bacteria, such as Salmonella spp. and E. coli, as well as other microorganisms, such as certain viruses, from sewage sludge considerably more effectively when E. fetida species is employed in vermifiltration [55],as illustrated in Fig. 3.
6.4 Removal of heavy metals and other toxic chemicals
Among the important traits of earthworms, there is bioaccumulation. Numerous studies have indicated that earthworms have the ability to accumulate higher concentrations of heavy metals, including those that cause disruption to the human intestine and those like cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), chromium (Cr), uranium (U), and lead (Pb) [2, 34].These metals may or may not be biologically available. Earthworms are effective in bioaccumulating in both situations and have no effect on the organism's physiology [56]. Numerous investigations have documented the presence of significantly more zinc in the effluent than in the geo-microbial filters, which are actually in charge of the bioconversion of the unstable to the stable fraction of metals [57]. This conversion causes it to be fixed in the tissues of the earthworm and the bed. As pH rises, the concentration of heavy metals in the vermibed effluent decreases because of the production of hydroxide ions and the subsequent adsorption of these ions by the bed materials [58]. As shown in Table 3, it has been observed through multiple research that the highly polluted compost can be used for the cultivation of sunflower and mustard because these plants are capable of and tolerate phytoremediation [62].
6.5 Improvement in BOD and COD
Research has shown that the vermifiltration method—which uses earthworms—removes more organic waste from sewage supplies than does a standard filter system [63]. Lower BOD is associated with greater organic matter breakdown and oxidation, which may be caused by earthworm discharge and interactions with aerobic bacteria [63]. Earthworms have a unique ability to dissolve insoluble organic materials, which helps microbial degradation even further [63]. In the end, all of these steps increase the removal of organic matter's efficiency [18]. The elimination effectiveness of COD is lower, according to a small number of experiments [18]. The procedure is further expedited by the biodegradable portion of the input breaking down due to the earthworms and bacteria' symbiotic connection. Higher temperatures were observed to increase the clearance of organic materials [20]. Seasonal temperature fluctuations might also alter this process. Because earthworm microbiological and enzymatic activity releases atmospheric carbon dioxide, higher consumption of organic carbon leads to lower quantities of total organic carbon (TOC) in vermifiltration [46, 47]. Numerous studies demonstrate that earthworms may lower the average COD of sewage by 80–90%, whereas in the absence of earthworms (with only the geological and microbiological systems in the control series), it is more than 15–25%, as Tables 1, 2, and 3 illustrate.
6.6 Other unique features of vermifiltration
6.6.1 No foul smell
In vermifiltration, earthworms are responsible for the absorbance of rot and decaying smell which are produced due to production of hydrogen sulphide and mercaptans. These chemicals are released due to the anaerobic microbes when their action is inhibited in the process of burrowing [46].
6.6.2 Production of vermicompost
Worm excrement, which is used to make vermicast, has long been utilized as a nutrient-rich plant nourishment. Vital nutrients including potassium, phosphorus, and nitrogen are abundant in vermicast (NPK). 1.16% nitrogen, 1.22% phosphorus, and 1.34% potassium have been found in this worm excrement [46]. Additionally, earthworms release proteins, polysaccharides, and other nitrogenous substances into the sewage, which is then further mineralized to produce nitrogen (N), which is then accessible to plants as nutrients (mostly in the form of nitrates) [46]. As a result, this vermicast is highly valued in agricultural settings.
6.6.3 Biomass production
For earthworms to multiply quickly, they need a steady supply of food (such as organic materials and bacteria) as well as favorable moisture conditions. In the wastewater, everything that is needed is sufficiently present. In the process of vermifiltration, a massive population, or biomass, of earthworms develops over time. A sizable aggregate of earthworm biomass may be produced at some point during the vermifiltration process [47]. Probiotics and a few key amino acids, such as methionine and lysine, are abundant in this biomass [64]. As a result, it is frequently utilized as feed for fish, poultry, and cattle farms [64]. Given that it provides fish with a more nutrient-dense live meal, this becomes highly popular in the fishing industry.
7 Limitations
This system of treatment for wastewater and sludge can only be operated in underground flow and under filter setting; it cannot be operated in setting which is submerged or floating because earthworm survival is affected in such conditions. In only two positions, it can be worked in straight standing position and horizontally. Earthworm’s bodies are formed of fragile muscles, they won't be able to survive under conditions of high hydraulic loading rate and direct rain [19, 36]. Additionally, the vermifilter's soil receives moisture and air gaps. There is a decrease in burrowing activity because it develops in the soil and rapidly loads with water [36]. Placement of the system is limited to the close door as earthworm cannot tolerate high temperature which can be caused because of the sun heat or other environmental factors [36]. Salinity disrupts earthworm’s internal osmotic balance which makes it impossible for earthworms to flourish [15]. The subsequent treatment could be problematic which results in the decrease of absorption of organic wastes, heavy metals, and other contaminants.Growth of earthworm biomass, and reproduction could be so rapid that it damages the stability of the vermifiltration procedure. Lack of food and room cause the earthworms' condition to worsen [6]. Every system for its optimum work, it need to be clean and sanitized. Cleaning the whole system is big task. There has been very less study for the most efficient method of doing this so that earthworms are not harmed. Running time is short. Choking is caused by the buildup of solids, the development of microbial colonies, and the development of sludge on the surface. In the casting and feeding of filters during vermifiltration treatment system runs for a little period of time due to frequent choking [46, 47, 64].
8 Future perspectives and conclusion
When earthworms are introduced to treat the waste effluent, it shows maximum positive results as this method is auto regulated. Vermifiltration technology requires low cost and maintenance, less energy and thus it could become a greater option to replace STPs, making the environment healthier. In this technique energy is only require for pumping of wastewater. Vermifiltration doesn’t need any professional labour as it doesn’t require any high profile devices. Pumps are only need to pull up waste influent into filter [6]. Chance of air pollution can also be prevented through this process, as sludge is not formed here, therefore landfill incineration doesn’t occur. Economically the technique is very impressive because the by-product and the rest wastes can be reutilized here. For example, vermicasts are used in agriculture and horticulture industry due to its high nutritive value. Investment in vermifiltration is also low as in one time earthworms must be bought from any vermiculture industry and in turn earthworms multiply rapidly in a very short time, making a heavy population in the vermibed media. From this study, it is now clearly understood that the vermifiltration technique may be a powerful alternative of the traditional waste water treatment by the STPs. This method is being more authentic and beneficial as earthworms acts as the major worker in vermifiltration. Earthworms have high impact in controlling environmental risks. In conventional STPs higher energy, huge amount of chemicals, high maintenance are required. These also require landfill incineration as heavy amount of sludge is generated here. Whereas, no sludge is formed in vermifiltration method, rather this process consumes less energy. The approach has also been used to solve the landfilling problem. All of the investigations show that, in an ideal setting, the BOD, COD, TSS, and TDS were reduced by roughly 97%, 90%, 90%, and 80%, respectively. These outcomes are far superior than those of the conventional sewage water treatment method. Moreover, the vermicast and treated effluent have significant nutritional effects since they include potassium (K), phosphorus (P), and nitrogen (N). As a result, the agricultural sector makes extensive use of both the effluent and the byproducts. The method's low maintenance costs and minimal negative environmental effects make it both cost-effective and environmentally beneficial. As a result, it is reasonable to state that the vermifiltration method of treating sewage water is safe and environmentally friendly.
Data availability
This article incorporates all the data examined during this research.
References
Verma AK, Dash RR, Bhunia P. A review on chemical coagulation/flocculation technologies for removal of colour from textile wastewaters. J Environ Manage. 2012;93:154–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.012.
Banerjee S, Kundu A, Dhak P. Bioremediation of uranium from waste effluents using novel biosorbents: a review. J RadioanalNucl Chem. 2022;331(6):2409–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08304-2.
Singh R, Bhunia P, Dash RR. Optimization of bioclogging in vermifilters: a statistical approach. J Environ Manag. 2019;233:576–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.065.
Matos GD, Arruda MAZ. Vermicompost as natural adsorbent for removing metal ions from laboratory effluents. Process Biochem. 2003;39:81–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00315-1.
Qasaimeh A, AlSharie H, Masoud T. A review on constructed wetlands components and heavy metal removal from wastewater. J Environ Prot. 2015;06:710–8. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2015.67064.
Sinha RK, Bharambe G, Chaudhari U. Sewage treatment by vermifiltration with synchronous treatment of sludge by earthworms: a low-cost sustainable technology over conventional systems with potential for decentralization. Environmentalist. 2008;28:409–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-008-9162-8.
Singh R, Samal K, Dash RR, Bhunia P. Vermifiltration as a sustainable natural treatment technology for the treatment and reuse of wastewater: a review. J Environ Manag. 2019;247:140–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.075.
Arora S, Saraswat S. Vermifiltration as a natural, sustainable and green technology for environmental remediation: a new paradigm for wastewater treatment process. Curr Res Green Sustain Chem. 2021;4: 100061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2021.100061.
Gilibert O, Gérino M, Costa DT, Sauvage S, Julien F, Gérard F, Capowiez Y, Orange D. Density effects of Eisenia sp epigeic earthworms on the hydraulic conductivity of sand filters for wastewater treatment. Water. 2022;14:1048. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071048.
Gérino M, Orange D, Sanchez-Perez JM, Buffan-Dubau E, Canocas S, Monfort B, Albasi C, Sauvage S. What inspiring elements from natural services of water quality regulation could be applied to water management? Water. 2022;14:3030. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14193030.
Nie E, Wang D, Yang M, Luo X, Fang C, Yang X, Su D, Zhou L, Zheng Z. Tower bio-vermifilter system for rural wastewater treatment: bench-scale, pilot-scale, and egineering applications. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2015;12:1053–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0479-6.
Li X, Xing M, Yang J, Dai X. Earthworm eco-physiological characteristics and quantification of earthworm feeding in vermifiltration system for sewage sludge stabilization using stable isotopic natural abundance. J Hazard Mater. 2014;276:353–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.042.
Xing M, Li X, Yang J, Lv B, Lu Y. Performance and mechanism of vermifiltration system for liquid-state sewage sludge treatment using molecular and stable isotopic techniques. Chem Eng J. 2012;197:143–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.05.003.
Greiner HG, Stonehouse AMT, Tiegs SD. Cold tolerance among composting earthworm species to evaluate invasion potential. Am Midl Nat. 2011;166(2):349–57. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-166.2.349.
Hughes RJ, Nair J, Ho G. The toxicity of ammonia/ammonium to the vermifiltration wastewater treatment process. Water Sci Technol. 2008;58(6):1215–20. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.478.
Lourenco N, Nunes LM. Optimization of a vermifiltration process for treating urban wastewater. Ecol Eng. 2017;100:138–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.11.074.
Singh R, Bhunia P, Dash RR. Optimization of organics removal and understanding the impact of HRT on vermifiltration of brewery wastewater. Sci Total Environ. 2019;651:1283–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.307.
Singh R, Bhunia P, Dash RR. COD removal index—a mechanistic tool for predicting organics removal performance of vermifilters. Sci Total Environ. 2018;643:1652–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.272.
Dey MD, Das S, Kumar R, Doley R, Bhattacharya SS, Mukhopadhyay R. Vermiremoval of methylene blue using Eisenia fetida: a potential strategy for bioremediation of synthetic dye-containing effluents. Ecol Eng. 2017;106:200–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.05.034.
Butt KR. An investigation into the growth and reproduction of the earthworm Lumbricusterrestris L. under controlled environmental conditions. 1990. https://doi.org/10.21954/OU.RO.0000DFCF.
Sinha RK, Herat S, Bharambe G, Brahambhatt A. Vermistabilization of sewage sludge (biosolids) by earthworms: converting a potential biohazard destined for landfill disposal into a pathogen-free, nutritive and safe biofertilizer for farms. Waste Manag Res J Sustain Circ Econ. 2010;28:872–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X09342147.
Gorito AM, Ribeiro AR, Almeida CMR, Silva AMT. A review on the application of constructed wetlands for the removal of priority substances and contaminants of emerging concern listed in recently launched EU legislation. Environ Pollut. 2017;227:428–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.060.
Parde D, et al. A review of constructed wetland on type, treatment and technology of wastewater. Environ Technol Innov. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101261.
Zheng X, Huang H, Su Y, et al. Long-term effects of engineered nanoparticles on enzyme activity and functional bacteria in wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci Technol. 2015;72:99. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.194.
Haynes RJ (2014) Chapter Two—nature of the belowground ecosystem and its development during Pedogenesis. In: Sparks, DBT-A, editors. Academic Press, pp. 43–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800131-8.00002-9.
Singh R, Bhunia P, Dash RR. Understanding intricacies of clogging and its alleviation by introducing earthworms in soil biofilters. Sci Total Environ. 2018;633:145–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.156.
Medina-Sauza RM, Álvarez-Jiménez M, Delhal A, Reverchon F, Blouin M, Guerrero-Analco JA, Cerdán CR, Guevara R, Villain L, Barois I. Earthworms building up soil microbiota, a review. Front Environ Sci. 2019;7:1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00081.
Brown GG, Barois I, Lavelle P. Regulation of soil organic matter dynamics and microbial activity in the drilosphere and the role of interactions with other edaphic functional domains. Eur J Soil Biol. 2000;36:177–98.
Ojha RB, Devkota D. Earthworms: “soil and ecosystem engineers”—a review. World J Agric Res. 2014;2:257–60. https://doi.org/10.12691/wjar-2-6-1.
Edwards CA, Lofty JR. Biology of earthworms. 2nd ed. New York: Chapman and Hall; Wiley, London; 1977.
Samal K, Dash RR, Bhunia P. Design and development of a hybrid macrophyte assisted vermifilter for the treatment of dairy wastewater: a statistical and kinetic modelling approach. Sci Total Environ. 2018;645:156–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.118.
Yang J, Liu J, Xing M, Lu Z, Yan Q. Effect of earthworms on the biochemical characterization of biofilms in vermifiltration treatment of excess sludge. BioresourTechnol. 2013;143:10–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.05.099.
Chowdhury SD, Soni MK, Bhunia P, Surampalli RY, Zhang TC. Inhibitory effects of organics in domestic, dairy, and brewery wastewater on the survival, growth, and reproduction of Earthworms. J Environ Eng. 2023;149(10):06023003. https://doi.org/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7364.
Bandhyopadhyay R, Chowdhury SD, Bhunia P, Surampalli RY. Impact of the organic strength of dairy wastewater and vermibed depth on the performance of macrophyte-assisted vermifilters. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste. 2023;27(3):04023012.
Gutierrez V, Gomez G, Rodriguez DC, Vidal G. Critical analysis of wastewater treatment using vermifilters: opening parameters, wastewater quality, and greenhouse gas emissions. J Environ Chem Eng. 2023;11: 109683.
Kannadasan N, Balasubramanian B, Palanisamy T, Shanmugam S, Pushparaj K, Al-Dhabi NA, Arasu MV, Narayanan M. Sustainable biotreatment of textile dye effluent water by using earthworms through vermifiltration. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101615.
Manyuchi MM, Mbohwa C, Muzenda E. Biological treatment of distillery wastewater by application of the vermifiltration technology. S Afr J Chem Eng. 2018;25:74–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2017.12.002.
Samal K, Dash RR, Bhunia P. Performance assessment of a Canna indica assisted vermifilter for synthetic dairy wastewater treatment. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2017;111:363–74.
Kumar T, Rajpal A, Arora S, Bhargava R, Prasad KSH, Kazmi AA. A comparative study on vermifiltration using epigeic earthworm Eisenia fetida and Eudriluseugeniae. Desalin Water Treat. 2016;57(14):6347–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1010230.
Xu D, Gu J, Li Y, Zhang Y, Howard A, Guan Y, Li J, Xu H. Purifying capability, enzyme activity, and nitrification potentials in December in integrated vertical flow constructed wetland with earthworms and different substrates. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23:273–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5734-6.
Kumar T, Bhargava R, Prasad KSH, Pruthi V. Evaluation of vermifiltration process using natural ingredients for effective wastewater treatment. EcolEng. 2015;75:370–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.11.044.
Arora S, Kazmi AA. The effect of seasonal temperature on pathogen removal efficacy of vermifilter for wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2015;74:88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.001.
Wang D, Nie E, Luo X, Yang X, Liu Q, Zheng Z. Study of nitrogen removal performance in pilot-scale multi-stage vermi-biofilter: operating conditions impacts and nitrogen speciation transformation. Environ Earth Sci. 2015;74:3815–24.
Manyuchi L, Kadzungura L, Boka S. Pilot scale studies for vermifiltration of 1000 m3/day of sewage wastewater. AJET. 2013.
Nuengjamnong C, Chiarawatchai N, Polprasert C, Otterpohi R. Treating swine wastewater by integrating earthworms into constructed wetlands. J Environ Sci Health A. 2011;46(7):800–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2011.572002.
Tomar P, Suthar S. Urban wastewater treatment using vermi-biofiltration system. Desalination. 2011;282:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.09.007.
Xing M, Li X, Yang J. Treatment performance of small-scale vermifilter for domestic wastewater and its relationship to earthworm growth, reproduction and enzymatic activity. Afr J Biotechnol. 2010;9(44):7513–20. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB10.811.
Xia S, Li J, Wang R. Nitrogen removal performance and microbial community structure dynamics response to carbon nitrogen ratio in a compact suspended carrier biofilm reactor. EcolEng. 2008;32:256–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.11.013.
Huang W, Zhao Y, Wu J, Zhang J, Zheng Z. Effects of different influent C/N ratios on the performance of various earthworm eco-filter systems: nutrient removal and greenhouse gas emission. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;30:109–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1430-1.
Wang D, Zhang Z, Li X, Zheng W, Ding Y, Yang B, Yang Q, Zeng T, Cao J, Yue X, Shen T, Zeng G, Deng J, He X. Effects of earthworms on surface clogging characteristics of intermittent sand filters. Water Sci Technol. 2010;61:2881–8. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.180.
Knowles P, Dotro G, Nivala J, García J. Clogging in subsurface-flow treatment wetlands: occurrence and contributing factors. EcolEng. 2011;37:99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.08.005.
Labella A, Caniani D, Hughes-Riley T, Morris RH, Newton MI, Hawes P, Puigagut J, García J, Uggetti E. Assessing the economic suitability of aeration and the influence of bed heating on constructed wetlands treatment efficiency and life-span. EcolEng. 2015;83:184–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.06.028.
Leverenz HL, Tchobanoglous G, Darby JL. Clogging in intermittently dosed sand filters used for wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2009;43:695–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.10.054.
Arora S, Kazmi AA. The effect of seasonal temperature on pathogen removal efficacy of vermifilter for wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2015;74:88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.
Arora S, Saraswat S, Rajpal A, Shringi H, Mishra R, Sethi J, Rajvanshi J, Nag A, Saxena S, Kazmi AA. Effect of earthworms in reduction and fate of antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) during clinical laboratory wastewater treatment by vermifiltration. Sci Total Environ. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145152.
Hoang TK, Probst A, Orange D, Gilbert F, Elger A, Kallerhoff J, Laurent F, Bassil S, Duong TT, Gerino M. Bioturbation effects on bioaccumulation of Cadmium in the wetland plant Typha latifolia: a nature-based experiment. STOTEN. 2018;618:1284–97.
Cui J, Cui J, Li J, Wang W, Xu B, Yang J, Li B, Chang Y, Liu X, Yao D. Improving earthworm quality and complex metal removal from water by adding aquatic plant residues to cattle manure. J Hazard Mater. 2023;443:13045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130145.
Kamarudheen N, George C, Bose I, Sathiavelu M, Sathiavelu A. Earthworm mediated bioremediation of phenol. Asian J Microbiol Biotechnol Environ Sci. 2014;16(2):449–53.
Jordão CP, Fialho LL, Neves JCL, Cecon PR, Mendonça ES, Fontes RLF. Reduction of heavy metal contents in liquid effluents by vermicomposts and the use of the metal-enriched vermicomposts in lettuce cultivation. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98:2800–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.06.023.
Zhang D, Yin C, Abbas N, Mao Z, Zhang Y. Multiple heavy metal tolerance and removal by an earthworm gut fungus Trichoderma brevicompactum QYCD-6. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):6940. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63813-y.
Shokoohi R, Ghobadi N, Godini K, Hadi M, Atashzaban Z. Antibiotic detection in a hospital wastewater and comparison of their removal rate by activated sludge and earthworm-based vermifiltration: environmental risk assessment. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2020;134:169–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.10.020.
Krishna VM, Hrushikesh N, Sreehari K, Kumar TA, Vidyavathi N, Pallavi A. Studies on bioremediation of phenol by earthworm. Int J Environ Sci. 2011;1(6):1268–73.
Murillo JM, Marañón T, Cabrera F, López R. Accumulation of heavy metals in sunflower and sorghum plants affected by the Guadiamar spill. Sci Total Environ. 1999;242:281–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00396-4.
Sinha RK, Chandran V, Soni BK, Patel U, Ghosh A. Earthworms: nature’s chemical managers and detoxifying agents in the environment: an innovative study on treatment of toxic wastewaters from the petroleum industry by vermifiltration technology. Environmentalist. 2012;32:445–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-012-9409-2.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Techno India University, West Bengal for their encouragement and support during this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AK and PD drafted the manuscript. SB, BM, and OS wrote, edited, and proof read the manuscript. All authors checked the final form of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declared no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Banerjee, S., Madhogaria, B., Saha, O. et al. Vermifiltration: an opportunity to improve wastewater treatment—a sustainable and natural approach. Discov Water 4, 47 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43832-024-00101-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43832-024-00101-0