Abstract
Study design
Retrospective review of hospital charts.
Objective
(1) To determine the microbiological profile of patients with surgical site infections following posterior spinal fusion surgery (PSF) for Adolescent Idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). (2) To study the treatment outcome of patients with surgical site infections (SSI) following surgery for AIS. (3) To identify the key differences in presentation and management of acute and delayed SSI following AIS surgery.
Summary of background data
There has been increasing evidence of the role of P. acnes in deep surgical site infections. Literature related to this is abundant in relation to shoulder arthroplasty; however, it is sparse in relation to spine surgery.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective review of all patients treated for AIS during a 5-year period (2010–2014) at our institution, with a minimum of 2-year follow-up after the index surgery. Patients with a postoperative infection following their index surgery were included. Charts of AIS patients with post-op infections were reviewed for details of the index surgery, time to presentation of the infection, presenting signs/symptoms, microbiology details, details of surgical and antibiotic treatment, and outcomes.
Results
Nine (2.8%) post-op infections were identified out of 315 cases for AIS during this period. Seven (2.2%) involved P. acnes. Two (0.6%) involved MSSA. The average time for cultures to show growth was 6.1 days (range 5–8 days) in P. acnes group and 2–3 days in MSSA group. Patients with P. acnes infections were treated with implant removal, debridement and antibiotics. All patients achieved solid fusion except two patients from the P. acnes group had pseudoarthrosis and had to undergo revision fusion.
Conclusion
Propionibacterium acnes was the single most common bacteria isolated from delayed surgical site infection following PSF in AIS patients. Optimal treatment consists of debridement, implant removal and antibiotics. These patients have high incidence of pseudoarthrosis.
Level of evidence
Level IV.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Infection after spine surgery is a devastating complication and can ruin the most desirable results of meticulously performed surgeries. This issue can be more devastating in extensive spinal deformity correction surgeries. Infection rates after deformity surgery range from 1.7% [1] to 6.9% [2]. With the advent of modern antibiotic prophylaxis, the incidence of perioperative infections with gram-positive organisms has been reduced drastically. However, what seems to be more concerning now is the increasing prevalence of late infections caused by skin commensals [1, 3,4,5].
One of the increasingly relevant skin flora is Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes). Propionibacterium acnes is a slow-growing aero tolerant anaerobic gram-positive organism that lives on sebum secreted by sebaceous glands [6] (Fig. 1). Traditionally, P. acnes was thought to only cause acne; however, in the recent years, it has been held responsible for causing perioperative infections in various organ systems like bone and joint surgery [7, 8], ocular [9] and dental [10] surgical procedures. Being rich in sebaceous glands, the skin of forehead, shoulder, neck and lumbar spine area has a high concentration of P. acnes [11] (Figs. 2, 3). This can possibly explain why P. acnes infections in orthopedic practices are commonly seen in shoulder and spine surgery. In surgeries, where instrumentation is required, P. acnes can be a significant latent pathogen because of its ability to form biofilms around implanted orthopedic devices [12].
The literature on P. acnes infection in spine surgery is sparse. We present our experience with late post-operative surgical site infections (SSI) in posterior instrumented fusions for pediatric deformity. In our series, P. acnes has been the most common organism isolated in such late SSI. Our goal is to inform and educate spine surgeons to P. acnes, on its incidence, presentation, and treatment options to address these late infections. We hope to initiate a discussion to develop strategies for preventing these infections.
Materials and methods
After obtaining approval from the institutional review board, we conducted a retrospective review of all patients treated for AIS during a 5-year period (2010–2014) at our institution, with a minimum of 2-year follow-up after the index surgery. There were 315 consecutive Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients operated at our center during this period. All these patients had received cefazolin IV within 30 min prior to skin incision and stainless steel implants were used for deformity correction. Patients with a postoperative infection following their index surgery were included. Charts of AIS patients with post-operative infections were reviewed for details of the index surgery, time to presentation of the infection, presenting signs/symptoms, microbiology details, details of surgical and antibiotic treatment, and outcomes.
Results
Nine (2.8%) post-operative infections were identified out of 315 cases for AIS during this period. Seven (2.2%) involved P. acnes, including one that was a polymicrobial infection with P. acnes, Acinetobacter and Staph epidermidis. Two (0.63%) of the infections were due to Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, MSSA. The average time to presentation for the P. acnes infection was 25.7 months (range 11–56 months), and the most common presenting symptom was dull back pain. Gradually these developed boggy swelling around the operative site. ESR and CRP levels were elevated in these patients. At this time, a clinical diagnosis of delayed surgical site infection was made and patients were advised surgery for debridement and implant removal. The average time for diagnosis of infection after the index surgery was 32 months (range 14–66 months) with the average time between onset of symptoms and diagnosis was 7 months (range 1–22 months). All patients with P. acnes infection were treated with implant removal and antibiotics as per recommendations from infectious disease specialist. A set of two deep cultures were taken from the surgical wound at the time of debridement. Notably prophylactic antibiotics at the time of this surgery were withheld until the time that the cultures were drawn. Post operatively each patient was given broad-spectrum antibiotics until the cultures were positive for P. acnes. The time for cultures to be positive was average 6.1 days (range 5–8 days) in our series. Once culture and sensitivity reports were available, antibiotics were converted to IV penicillin.
In the two patients who had infection due to MSSA, the average time to presentation was 3 weeks. Both of these patients presented with wound drainage. These patients were treated with irrigation and debridement with retention of spinal implants. These patients were treated with 4–6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics followed by 1 year of oral antibiotics. These patients did not require implant removal at the debridement surgery nor require implant removal at final follow-up.
One patient with delayed infection did not grow any organism on culture. Since this patient’s clinical presentation was consistent with P. acnes infection, we treated him with debridement, implant removal and IV antibiotics. This patient was lost to follow up 3 months after revision surgery. Eight patients were followed up for an average period of 64 months (range 32–120 months) from the index surgery. Six patients (four P. acnes, two MSSA) achieved solid fusion without any additional procedure. There were two patients who were diagnosed to have pseudoarthrosis at the time of surgical debridement. They were managed with same protocol of debridement, implant removal and antibiotics. Revision instrumented fusion was done at the end of antibiotic therapy and they eventually achieved solid fusion. These two patients had normalization of the ESR and CRP prior to revision surgery. The details of all nine patients with postoperative infection patients are shown in Table 1.
Discussion
In our series, patients with P. acnes infections took several months to years to present with infection versus patients with MSSA acute infections, who presented within 3 weeks of the index operation. This can be attributable to the formation of biofilms around orthopedic implants by P. acnes [24]. Unfortunately, biofilm forming species have been correlated with worse outcomes than those that do not form biofilms [12, 25]. These biofilms protect the bacteria from phagocytosis and also prevent antibodies and antibiotics from reaching the bacteria [26]. This also keeps the bacteria relatively isolated from the immune system [27, 28]. Hence, most patients with postoperative P. acnes infection lack the classical inflammatory response of pain, redness, elevated temperature and rather present with unexplained dull aching pain and swelling [29, 30]. All of our patients with P. acnes infection presented with dull back pain and swelling.
Possible routes of late infections in spine include hematogenous seeding [13] or activation of dormant organisms that were implanted at the time of surgery [14]. However, some researchers believe that late activation of implanted bacteria during surgery remains the major route of entry in delayed infections while claiming hematogenous seeding is a doubtful concept [1]. Currently, routine skin preparation methods seem to be inadequate for removal of this organism at the incision site. It has been hypothesized that these organisms enter the operative site at the time of incision during the index surgery and contaminate implanted orthopedic devices, subsequently producing biofilms that make them resistant to antibiotics [11, 15, 16]. In one retrospective analysis, Nandyala et al. showed tissue contamination with skin commensals occurred in up to 23% of patients and the most common bacteria isolated from the tissue cultures was P. acnes [17]. Literature supporting this philosophy has been published in relation to primary [18] as well as revision shoulder arthroplasty [19]. In the McGoldrick et al. series, a substantial number of patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty for stiffness or component loosening that were presumed to be aseptic were infected with P. acnes. Similar findings have also been seen with primary lumbar disc herniation, where in P. acnes have been cultured from herniated nucleus pulposus collected during surgery [20,21,22,23].
Two of our P. acnes infection patients were diagnosed with pseudoarthrosis when implants were removed for debridement. P. acnes is increasingly found in revision spine surgeries for pseudoarthrosis. Shifflett et al., in their series of 578 cases of presumed aseptic revision spine surgeries, found that P. acnes was the most common organisms cultured from the surgical wounds. P. acnes was three times more common than any other organism. In their series, more than 54.2% patients with primary diagnosis of pseudoarthrosis had positive cultures for P. acnes. The average time between the index and the revision surgery was 57.6 months which again reiterates the slow and indolent nature of these infections [31]. This suggests that infections with slow-growing organism like P. acnes may have a significant impact in slowing or arresting fusion in spine surgery. Multiple deep cultures should be taken from the wound and should be cultured on an anaerobic liquid medium like thioglycolate broth for up to 14 days or longer to detect P. acnes [16, 32, 33] (Table 2). In our study, two deep cultures were taken from the surgical site at the time of surgical debridement and implant removal and inoculated on thioglycolate broth. The average time for P. acnes to be positive on culture was 6.1 days (range 5–8 days). We attribute the early growth in culture to high bacterial burden in our patients. However, we still recommend holding cultures for a minimum of 14 days to account for slow-growing organisms before declaring cultures to be negative.
All P. acnes patients who did not have pseudoarthrosis were clinically cured with the approach of surgical debridement, implant removal followed by antibiotic therapy. Two patients were found to have pseudoarthrosis at the time of surgical debridement. Yet, we followed our standard protocol of implant removal and antibiotic therapy for these patients and revision instrumented fusion surgery done at a later date. These patients were not braced, and were scheduled once lab parameters of CRP and ESR had normalized. Both of the patients were operated by 6 months post implant removal. Retaining implants in deep infections has a risk of recurrence of infection. In a series of 15 patients with AIS with late post-operative infections, Silvestre et al. tried to salvage implants in six patients who presented with less severe clinical signs of infection. They treated these patients with debridement, pulse irrigation and continuous suction irrigation. At a mean duration of 11 months, they had to perform implant removal on all these patients due to recurrence or persistence of infection [34]. Maruo et al. have shown that P. acnes is a significant risk factor in treatment failure of surgical site infections leading to instrumentation removal [35]. Because instrumentation removal before full fusion can lead to a loss of correction in idiopathic scoliosis [36], preventing or rapidly diagnosing and treating P. acnes infections can help prevent unnecessary complications and revision surgery.
In contrast, the two patients with MSSA infections presented 3 weeks after the index surgery. They were treated with wound lavage and IV antibiotics for 4–6 weeks followed by oral antibiotics for up to 1 year duration. Notably, these patients did not need implant removal and achieved solid fusion at final follow-up. Table 3 demonstrates key differences between P. acnes and MSSA surgical site infection in our series.
We used stainless steel implants in all our patients. Stainless steel has higher stiffness and is not notch sensitive as compared to titanium [37, 38]. In our experience, we can apply a higher corrective force and thus gain better deformity correction with stainless steel implants. Some reports state that use of stainless steel implants in spine surgery was associated with higher incidence of SSI in spine surgery [34, 39]. However, in another study, Wright et al. have shown that the type of metal, stainless steel, titanium, or cobalt chrome/titanium, does not affect the risk of SSI in scoliosis surgery [40]. As of today, we still continue to use stainless steel implants for deformity correction surgery in AIS.
Future research could be directed with the following questions:
-
1.
Is the rise in incidence of P. acnes infections due to improved microbiological techniques to detect it?
-
2.
Is there a change in the virulence of P. acnes? Has P. acnes made the transition from a skin commensal to an actual pathogen in surgical site infections? [41,42,43]
-
3.
Are there particular strains of P. acnes that are more likely to be causative in surgical site infections?
-
4.
With the increasing number of P. acnes infections, do we need to change our protocols of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent P. acnes infections in spine surgery?
From January 2005 onwards, we have been using our institutional infection control protocol for all spinal fusion cases following which SSI rates for all cervical, thoracic, and lumbar instrumented cases combined decreased from 3.9% (97/2473) to 0.93% (57/6158) (p < 0.0001) [44]. The protocol consists of
-
1.
Chlorhexidine wash (HIBICLENS -Mölnlycke Health Care, Norcross, GA) wash to the surgical site on the night before and morning of surgery.
-
2.
Surgical site is scrubbed with Chlorhexidene solution for three minutes, wiped with 70% isopropyl alcohol and painted with ChloraPrep (2% Chlorhexidene gluconate, 70% isopropyl alcohol) solution and allowed to dry. The surgical site is draped and covered with Ioban (3 M Health care).
-
3.
Perioperative antibiotics: all patients receive preoperative intravenous antibiotics consisting of Cefazolin—a first generation cephalosporin. In patients with an allergy to cephalosporins, vancomycin is utilized. All patients have antibiotics redosed intraoperatively every 3–4 h. All intravenous antibiotics are discontinued at 48 h after surgery or earlier if the patient is discharged within 48 h.
-
4.
Copious wound irrigation with normal saline antibiotic solution containing 50,000 units of Bacitracin in 3 L of normal saline.
-
5.
Local, intra-wound antibiotic delivery (deep and subcutaneous) with vancomycin powder (this is a recent infection control measure instituted by our team in January 2014).
-
6.
Meticulous, layered wound closure.
-
7.
Closed suction drains are routinely utilized. Drains are generally removed 1–3 days after surgery, while the dressing on the wound is kept intact.
-
8.
Bacitracin ointment over the wound.
-
9.
Iodine impregnated 1 inch Steri strips applied on top of the ointment.
-
10.
Sterile dressing using gas permeable barrier (Opsite Films- Smith and Nephew, Fort Worth, TX).
-
11.
Wound dressings are never changed and removed after 5 days and then wounds are left open to air.
In 2014, following the study period, we started adding 2 g of vancomycin powder with crushed cancellous bone allograft used for fusion in the AIS surgeries. Local Vancomycin powder in dose of 2 gm has found to be safe and effective in reducing infection rate in spine surgery from 2.6% to 0.2%. Despite high local concentrations up to 1457 μg/ml, vancomycin has shown minimal systemic absorption with no systemic side effects as would otherwise be seen with its intravenous use [45, 46]. In our experience, we have not encountered any P. acnes infection in AIS patients after this intervention. It is possible that local vancomycin applied in the wound has inhibitory effect on P. acnes. Patients with acne lesions posted for scoliosis surgery are sent for a dermatology consult. We start them on oral Tetracyline antibiotic for 2 weeks before the surgery and continue the same for 1 week after the surgery. These points can be a future direction for research in terms of prevention of P. acnes infections in Posterior instrumented spinal fusion surgeries in AIS.
Conclusions
-
Propionibacterium acnes is the most common skin commensal on the back
-
Cultures should be held for a minimum of 14 days to improve the likelihood of diagnosis of a latent organism like P. acnes
-
Propionibacterium acnes infections usually presented late because of their ability to form biofilms and avoid immune detection
-
Treatment of P. acnes infections involves debridement, instrumentation removal and antibiotics
References
Clark CE, Shufflebarger HL (1999) Late-developing infection in instrumented idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24:1909–1912 ((Phila Pa 1976))
Hahn F, Zbinden R, Min K (2005) Late implant infections caused by Propionibacterium acnes in scoliosis surgery. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 14:783–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0854-6
Rayes M, Colen CB, Bahgat DA, Higashida T, Guthikonda M, Rengachary S et al (2010) Safety of instrumentation in patients with spinal infection. J Neurosurg Spine 12:647–659. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.12.SPINE09428
Richards BS (1995) Delayed infections following posterior spinal instrumentation for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:524–529
Farley FA, Li Y, Gilsdorf JR, VanderHave KL, Hensinger RN, Speers M et al (2014) Postoperative spine and VEPTR infections in children: a case-control study. J Pediatr Orthop 34:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182a0064d
Leeming JP, Holland KT, Cunliffe WJ (1984) The microbial ecology of pilosebaceous units isolated from human skin. J Gen Microbiol 130:803–807. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-130-4-803
Lutz M-F, Berthelot P, Fresard A, Cazorla C, Carricajo A, Vautrin A-C et al (2005) Arthroplastic and osteosynthetic infections due to Propionibacterium acnes: a retrospective study of 52 cases, 1995–2002. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 24:739–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-005-0040-8
Zeller V, Ghorbani A, Strady C, Leonard P, Mamoudy P, Desplaces N (2007) Propionibacterium acnes: an agent of prosthetic joint infection and colonization. J Infect 55:119–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2007.02.006
Deramo VA, Ting TD (2001) Treatment of Propionibacterium acnes endophthalmitis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 12:225–229
Crawford JJ, Sconyers JR, Moriarty JD, King RC, West JF (1974) Bacteremia after tooth extractions studied with the aid of prereduced anaerobically sterilized culture media. Appl Microbiol 27:927–932
McLorinan GC, Glenn JV, McMullan MG, Patrick S (2005) Propionibacterium acnes wound contamination at the time of spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200508000-00012
Holmberg A, Lood R, Mörgelin M, Söderquist B, Holst E, Collin M et al (2009) Biofilm formation by Propionibacterium acnes is a characteristic of invasive isolates. Clin Microbiol Infect 15:787–795. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02747.x
Heggeness MH, Esses SI, Errico T, Yuan HA (1993) Late infection of spinal instrumentation by hematogenous seeding. Spine 18:492–496 ((Phila Pa 1976))
Dietz FR, Koontz FP, Found EM, Marsh JL (1991) The importance of positive bacterial cultures of specimens obtained during clean orthopaedic operations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:1200–1207
Lee MJ, Pottinger PS, Butler-Wu S, Bumgarner RE, Russ SM, Matsen FA 3rd (2014) Propionibacterium persists in the skin despite standard surgical preparation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96:1447–1450. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.m.01474
Matsen FA 3rd, Butler-Wu S, Carofino BC, Jette JL, Bertelsen A, Bumgarner R (2013) Origin of propionibacterium in surgical wounds and evidence-based approach for culturing propionibacterium from surgical sites. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:e1811–e1817. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01733
Nandyala SV, Schwend RM (2013) Prevalence of intraoperative tissue bacterial contamination in posterior pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Spine 38:E482–E486. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182893be1 ((Phila Pa 1976))
Matsen FA, Russ SM, Bertelsen A, Butler-Wu S, Pottinger PS (2015) Propionibacterium can be isolated from deep cultures obtained at primary arthroplasty despite intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Shoulder Elb Surg 24:844–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.016
McGoldrick E, McElvany MD, Butler-Wu S, Pottinger PS, Matsen FA (2015) Substantial cultures of Propionibacterium can be found in apparently aseptic shoulders revised three years or more after the index arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 24:31–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.05.008
Albert HB, Lambert P, Rollason J, Sorensen JS, Worthington T, Pedersen MB et al (2013) Does nuclear tissue infected with bacteria following disc herniations lead to Modic changes in the adjacent vertebrae? Eur Spine J 22:690–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2674-z
Agarwal V, Golish SR, Alamin TF (2011) Bacteriologic culture of excised intervertebral disc from immunocompetent patients undergoing single level primary lumbar microdiscectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:397–400. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182019f3a
Zhou Z, Chen Z, Zheng Y, Cao P, Liang Y, Zhang X et al (2015) Relationship between annular tear and presence of Propionibacterium acnes in lumbar intervertebral disc. Eur Spine J 24:2496–2502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4180-y
Capoor MN, Ruzicka F, Schmitz JE, James GA, Machackova T, Jancalek R et al (2017) Propionibacterium acnes biofilm is present in intervertebral discs of patients undergoing microdiscectomy. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174518
Holmberg A, Lood R, Morgelin M, Soderquist B, Holst E, Collin M et al (2009) Biofilm formation by Propionibacterium acnes is a characteristic of invasive isolates. Clin Microbiol Infect 15:787–795. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02747.x
Morgenstern M, Post V, Erichsen C, Hungerer S, Bhren V, Militz M et al (2016) Biofilm formation increases treatment failure in Staphylococcus epidermidis device-related osteomyelitis of the lower extremity in human patients. J Orthop Res 34:1905–1913. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23218
Bjarnsholt T (2013) The role of bacterial biofilms in chronic infections. APMIS 121:1–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12099
Achermann Y, Goldstein EJC, Coenye T, Shirtliff ME (2014) Propionibacterium acnes: from commensal to opportunistic biofilm-associated implant pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:419–440. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00092-13
Ramage G, Tunney MM, Patrick S, Gorman SP, Nixon JR (2003) Formation of Propionibacterium acnes biofilms on orthopaedic biomaterials and their susceptibility to antimicrobials. Biomaterials 24:3221–3227
Aleissa S, Parsons D, Grant J, Harder J, Howard J (2011) Deep wound infection following pediatric scoliosis surgery: incidence and analysis of risk factors. Can J Surg 54:263–269. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.008210
Rihn JA, Lee JY, Ward WT (2008) Infection after the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evaluation of the diagnosis, treatment, and impact on clinical outcomes. Spine 33:289–294. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318162016e ((Phila Pa 1976))
Shifflett G, Bjerke-Kroll B, Nwachukwu B, Kueper J, Burket J, Sama A et al (2016) Microbiologic profile of infections in presumed aseptic revision spine surgery. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4539-8
Bémer P, Corvec S, Tariel S, Asseray N, Boutoille D, Langlois C et al (2008) Significance of Propionibacterium acnes-positive samples in spinal instrumentation. Spine 33:E971–E976. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818e28dc ((Phila Pa 1976))
Butler-Wu SM, Burns EM, Pottinger PS, Magaret AS, Rakeman JL, Matsen FA 3rd et al (2011) Optimization of periprosthetic culture for diagnosis of Propionibacterium acnes prosthetic joint infection. J Clin Microbiol 49:2490–2495. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00450-11
Di Silvestre M, Bakaloudis G, Lolli F, Giacomini S (2011) Late-developing infection following posterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 1):S121–S127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1754-1
Maruo K, Berven SH (2014) Outcome and treatment of postoperative spine surgical site infections: predictors of treatment success and failure. J Orthop Sci 19:398–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0545-z
Ho C, Skaggs DL, Weiss JM, Tolo VT (2007) Management of infection after instrumented posterior spine fusion in pediatric scoliosis. Spine 32:2739–2744. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a5a86 (Phila Pa 1976)
Dick JC, Bourgeault CA (2001) Notch sensitivity of titanium alloy, commercially pure titanium, and stainless steel spinal implants. Spine 26:1668–1672 (Phila Pa 1976)
Chen P-Q, Lin S-J, Wu S-S, So H (2003) Mechanical performance of the new posterior spinal implant: effect of materials, connecting plate, and pedicle screw design. Spine 28:881–886. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000058718.38533.B8 (Phila Pa 1976 discussion 887)
LaGreca J, Hotchkiss M, Carry P, Messacar K, Nyquist A-C, Erickson M et al (2014) Bacteriology and risk factors for development of late (greater than one year) deep infection following spinal fusion with instrumentation. Spine Deform 2:186–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2013.12.004
Wright ML, Skaggs DL, Matsumoto H, Woon RP, Trocle A, Flynn JM et al (2016) Does the type of metal instrumentation affect the risk of surgical site infection in pediatric scoliosis surgery? Spine Deform 4:206–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.11.002
Bruggemann H, Henne A, Hoster F, Liesegang H, Wiezer A, Strittmatter A et al (2004) The complete genome sequence of Propionibacterium acnes, a commensal of human skin. Science 305:671–673. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100330
McDowell A, Valanne S, Ramage G, Tunney MM, Glenn JV, McLorinan GC et al (2005) Propionibacterium acnes types I and II represent phylogenetically distinct groups. J Clin Microbiol 43:326–334. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.1.326-334.2005
Valanne S, McDowell A, Ramage G, Tunney MM, Einarsson GG, O’Hagan S et al (2005) CAMP factor homologues in Propionibacterium acnes: a new protein family differentially expressed by types I and II. Microbiology 151:1369–1379. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.27788-0
Bains RS, Kardile M, Mitsunaga LK, Bains S, Singh N, Idler C (2017) Postoperative spine dressing changes are unnecessary. Spine Deform 5:396–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.04.005
Sweet FA, Roh M, Sliva C (2011) Intrawound application of vancomycin for prophylaxis in instrumented thoracolumbar fusions. Spine 36:2084–2088. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ff2cb1 (Phila Pa 1976)
Khan NR, Thompson CJ, DeCuypere M, Angotti JM, Kalobwe E, Muhlbauer MS et al (2014) A meta-analysis of spinal surgical site infection and vancomycin powder. J Neurosurg Spine 21:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.8.SPINE1445
Funding
No financial sources to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study conceptualization: RSB, TLL, MPK, SSB, CCK; Methodology: MPK, SSB, CCK, TLL, RSB; Formal Analysis and investigation: MPK, SSB, CCK, TLL, RSB; Writing of first draft of Manuscript: MPK, SSB, CCK, TLL, RSB; Review, editing and final approval of manuscript: RSB, TLL, MPK, SSB, CCK, TLL; Funding: None; Resources: None; Supervision: RSB.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
Institutional IRB approval obtained. The study was conducted in compliance with the Ethical standards.
Informed consent
Study is a retrospective chart review so informed consent has been waived off.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kardile, M.P., Bains, S.S., Kuo, C.C. et al. Is Propionibacterium acnes becoming the most common bacteria in delayed infections following adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery?. Spine Deform 9, 757–767 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00250-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00250-x