Abstract
Let \({\mathcal {L}}=-\varDelta +V\) be a Schrödinger operator, where the nonnegative potential V belongs to the reverse Hölder class \(B_{q}\). By the aid of the subordinative formula, we estimate the regularities of the fractional heat semigroup, \(\{e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}\}_{t>0},\) associated with \({\mathcal {L}}\). As an application, we obtain the BMO\(^{\gamma }_{{\mathcal {L}}}\)-boundedness of the maximal function, and the Littlewood–Paley g-functions associated with \({\mathcal {L}}\) via T1 theorem, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In the research of harmonic analysis and partial differential equations, the maximal operators and Littlewood–Paley g-functions paly an important role and were investigated by many mathematicians extensively. For any integrable function f on \({\mathbb {R}}^{n}\), the Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator is defined as
where the supremum is taken over all cubes \(Q\subset {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\). For \(f\in {\mathrm{BMO}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\), Bennett–DeVore–Sharpley proved in [1] that M(f) is either infinite or belongs to BMO\(({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\). The boundedness result in [1] can be extended to other maximal operators. For example, let \(-\varDelta\) be the Laplace operator: \(\varDelta =\sum ^{n}_{i=1}\frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial x_{i}^{2}}\). Denote by \(M_{\varDelta }\) and g the maximal operator and Littlewood–Paley g-function generated by the heat semigroup \(\{e^{-t(-\varDelta )}\}_{t>0}\), respectively, i.e.,
Due to the mean value on “large” cubes may be infinite, the BMO\(({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\)-boundedness of \(M_{\varDelta }\) or g holds if \(M_{\varDelta }(f)<\infty\) or \(g(f)<\infty\) for \(f\in {\mathrm{BMO}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\).
However, if the Laplacian \(-\varDelta\) is replaced by other second-order differential operators, the situation becomes different. Consider the Schrödinger \({\mathcal {L}}=-\varDelta +V\) in \({\mathbb {R}}^{n},\ \ n\ge 3,\) where V is a nonnegative potential belonging to the reverse Hölder class \(B_{q}\) for some \(q>n/2\). Here a nonnegative potential V is said to belong to \(B_{q}\) if there exists \(C>0\) such that for every ball B,
In [1], the authors pointed out that for \(f\in {\mathrm{BMO}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) a supremum of averages of f over “large” cubes may be infinite, see [1, page 610]. In 2005, Dziubański et al. [9] proved the square functions associated with Schrödinger operators are bounded on the BMO type space BMO\(_{{\mathcal {L}}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) related with \({\mathcal {L}}\) which is distinguished from the case of \(BMO({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\). See also [13, 18] for similar results in the setting of Heisenberg groups and stratified Lie groups.
Let \(H=-\varDelta +|x|^{2}\) be the harmonic oscillator. In [2], Betancor et al. introduced a T1 criterion for Calderón–Zygmund operators related to H on the BMO type space BMO\(_{H}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\). Later, Ma et al. [15] generalized the T1 criterion to the case of Campanato type spaces BMO\(_{{\mathcal {L}}}^{\gamma }({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) related with \({\mathcal {L}}\). As applications, the authors in [15] proved that the maximal operators associated with the heat semigroup \(\{e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}}\}_{t>0}\) and with the generalized Poisson operators \(\{P^{\sigma }_{t}\}_{t>0}(0<\sigma <1)\), the Littlewood–Paley g-functions given in terms of the heat and the Poisson semigroups are bounded on BMO\(^{\gamma }_{{\mathcal {L}}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\).
Notice that for \(\sigma \in (0,1)\), the generalized Poisson operator \(\{P^{\sigma }_{t}\}_{t>0}\) is expressed as
Specially, for \(\sigma =1/2\), \(\{P^{1/2}_{t}\}_{t>0}\) is corresponding to the Poisson semigroup \(\{e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{1/2}}\}_{t>0}\) associated with \({\mathcal {L}}\). The main purpose of this paper is to derive the pointwise estimate and regularity properties of the fractional heat semigroup \(\{e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}\}_{t>0}\), \(\alpha >0\), to prove the boundedness of the maximal function and the Littlewood–Paley g-functions generated by \(\{e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}\}_{t>0}\) on BMO\(^{\gamma }_{{\mathcal {L}}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\), \(0<\gamma <\min \{2\alpha ,\delta _{0},1\}\), via T1 theorem, respectively.
When \({\mathcal {L}}=-\varDelta\), the kernels of the fractional heat semigroup \(\{e^{-t(-\varDelta )^{\alpha }}\}_{t>0}\) can be defined via the Fourier transform, i.e.,
For \({\mathcal {L}}=-\varDelta +V\) with \(V>0\), the kernels of fractional heat semigroups \(\{e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}\}_{t>0}\), \(\alpha \in (0,1)\), can not be defined via (3). However, for \(\alpha >0\), the subordinative formula (cf. [10]) indicates that
where \(\eta ^{\alpha }_{t}(\cdot )\) is a continuous function on \((0,\infty )\) satisfying (19) below. In [12], the identity (4) was applied to estimate \(K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(\cdot ,\cdot )\) via the heat kernel \(K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{t}(\cdot ,\cdot )\), see Proposition 2. Specially, for \(\alpha =1/2\), the estimates of \(K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(\cdot ,\cdot )\) goes back to those of the Poisson kernel \(P_{t}^{{\mathcal {L}}}(\cdot ,\cdot )\), see [5, Lemma 3.9].
We point out that, compared with the case of \(\{P^{\sigma }_{t}\}_{t>0}\), some new regularity estimates should be introduced to prove the BMO\(^{\gamma }_{{\mathcal {L}}}\)-boundedness of the maximal function and Littlewood–Paley g-functions generated by \(\{e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}\}_{t>0}\). Let \(E=L^{\infty }((0,\infty ), {\mathrm{d}}t)\). It follows from (2) and the Minkowski integral inequality that
The fact that
ensures that the BMO\(^{\gamma }_{{\mathcal {L}}}\)-boundedness of the maximal function \(\sup _{t>0}|P^{\sigma }_{t}f(x)|\) can be deduced from that of the heat maximal function \(\sup _{t>0}|e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}}f(x)|\), see [15, Proposition 4.7]. However, we can see from the identity (4) that this method is not applicable to the case \(\{e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}\}_{t>0}\).
In this paper, we get the following results:
-
In Sect. 3.1, let \(\displaystyle \nabla _{x}=\left( {\partial }/{\partial x_{1}},{\partial }/{\partial x_{2}},\ldots ,{\partial }/{\partial x_{n}}\right)\). By the perturbation theory for semigroups of operators, we deduce the pointwise estimates and the Hölder type estimates of the kernels:
$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ \begin{aligned}&\left| \nabla _{x}(K_{t}(x-y)-K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{t}(x,y))\right| ,\\&\left| t^{m}\partial ^{m}_{t}(K_{t}(x-y)-K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{t}(x,y))\right| ,\\ \end{aligned}\right. \end{aligned}$$ -
In Sect. 3.2, we use (3) to obtain the corresponding estimates for
$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ \begin{aligned}&\left| K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(x,y)-K_{\alpha ,t}(x-y)\right| ,\\&\left| t^{1/2\alpha }\nabla _{x}(K_{\alpha ,t}(x-y)-K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha , t}(x,y))\right| ,\\&\left| t^{m}\partial ^{m}_{t}(K_{\alpha ,t}(x-y)-K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha , t}(x,y))\right| ,\\ \end{aligned}\right. \end{aligned}$$ -
In Sect. 4, as applications of the regularity estimates obtained in Sect. 3, we use the T1 criterion established in [15] to prove the boundedness on Campanato type spaces BMO\(^{\gamma }_{{\mathcal {L}}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\), \(0<\gamma <\min \{2\alpha ,\delta _{0},1\}\), of the following maximal operator and g-functions:
$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ \begin{aligned}&M^{\alpha }_{{\mathcal {L}}}f(x):=\sup _{t>0}|e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}f(x)|;\\&g^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha }(f)(x):=\left( \int ^{\infty }_{0}|D^{{\mathcal {L}},m}_{\alpha ,t}(f)(x)|^{2}\frac{{\mathrm{d}}t}{t}\right) ^{1/2};\\&{\widetilde{g}}^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha }f(x):=\left( \int ^{\infty }_{0}|{\widetilde{D}}^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(f)(x)|^{2}\frac{{\mathrm{d}}t}{t}\right) ^{1/2}, \end{aligned} \right. \end{aligned}$$see Theorems 3–5, respectively, where \(D^{{\mathcal {L}},m}_{\alpha ,t}\) and \({\widetilde{D}}^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}\) are the operators with the integral kernels
$$\begin{aligned} {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} &{}D^{{\mathcal {L}},m}_{\alpha ,t}(x,y):=t^{m}\partial _{t}^{m}K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(x,y),\\ &{}{\widetilde{D}}^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(x,y):=t^{1/2\alpha }\nabla _{x}K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(x,y), \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}$$(5)respectively.
Notations We will use c and C to denote the positive constants, which are independent of main parameters and may be different at each occurrence. By \(B_{1}\sim B_{2}\), we mean that there exists a constant \(C>1\) such that \(C^{-1}\le B_{1}/B_{2}\le C.\)
2 Preliminaries
2.1 Schrödinger operators and function spaces
In this paper, let \(\delta _{0}=2- n/q\). At first, we list some properties of the potential V which will be used in the sequel.
Lemma 1
[16, Lemma1.2]
-
(i)
For \(0<r<R<\infty\),
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{r^{n-2}}\int _{B(x,r)}V(y){\mathrm{d}}y\le C\left( \frac{r}{R}\right) ^{\delta }\frac{1}{R^{n-2}}\int _{B(x,R)}V(y){\mathrm{d}}y. \end{aligned}$$ -
(ii)
\(r^{2-n}\int _{B(x,r)}V(y){\mathrm{d}}y=1\) if \(r=\rho (x)\). \(r\sim \rho (x)\) if and only if \(r^{2-n}\int _{B(x,r)}V(y){\mathrm{d}}y\sim 1.\)
Lemma 2
[16, Lemma 1.4]
-
(i)
There exist \(C>0\) and \(k_{0}\ge 1\) such that for all \(x,y\in {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\),
$$\begin{aligned} C^{-1}\rho (x)\left( 1+|x-y|/\rho (x)\right) ^{-k_{0}}\le \rho (y)\le C\rho (x)\left( 1+|x-y|/\rho (x)\right) ^ {k_{0}/(1+k_{0})}. \end{aligned}$$In particular, \(\rho (y)\sim \rho (x)\) if \(|x-y|<C\rho (x)\).
-
(ii)
There exists \(l_{0}>1\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} \int _{B(x,R)}\frac{V(y)}{|x-y|^{n-2}}{\mathrm{d}}y\le \frac{C}{R^{n-2}}\int _{B(x,R)}V(y){\mathrm{d}}y\le C\left( 1+ \frac{R}{\rho (x)}\right) ^{l_{0}}. \end{aligned}$$
Lemma 3
[7, Corollary 2.8] For every nonnegative Schwarz function \(\omega\), there exist \(\delta >0\) and \(C>0\) such that
where \(l_{0}\) is the constant given in Lemma 2.
It is well known that the classical Hardy space \(H^{1}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) can be defined via the maximal function \(\sup _{t>0}|e^{-t(-\varDelta )}f(x)|\) (cf. [17]). In this sense, we can say that the Hardy space \(H^{1}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) is the Hardy space associated with \(-\varDelta\). Since 1990s, the theory of Hardy spaces associated with operators on \({\mathbb {R}}^{n}\) has been investigated extensively. In [6], Dziubański and Zienkiewicz introduced the Hardy space \(H^{1}_{{\mathcal {L}}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) related to Schrödinger operators \({\mathcal {L}}\) and obtained the atomic characterization and the Riesz transform characterization of \(H^{1}_{{\mathcal {L}}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) via local Hardy spaces. By the aid of Campanato type spaces, the spaces \(H^{p}_{{\mathcal {L}}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\ (0<p\le 1)\) were introduced by Dziubański and Zienkiewicz [7]. In recent years, the results of [6, 7] have been extended to other second-ordered differential operators, and various function spaces associated to operators have been established. For further information, we refer the reader to [3, 18,19,20] and the references therein.
For a Schrödinger operator \({\mathcal {L}}\), let \(\{e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}}\}_{t>0}\) be the heat semigroup generated by \({\mathcal {L}}\) and denote by \(K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{t}(\cdot ,\cdot )\) the integral kernel of \(e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}}\). Because the potential \(V\ge 0\), the Feynman-Kac formula implies that
The Hardy type spaces \(H^{p}_{{\mathcal {L}}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\), \(0<p\le 1\), are defined as follows (cf. [7]):
Definition 1
For \(0<p\le 1\), the Hardy type space \(H^{p}_{{\mathcal {L}}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) is defined as the completion of the space of compactly supported \(L^{1}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\)-functions such that the maximal function
belongs to \(L^{p}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\). The quasi-norm in \(H^{p}_{{\mathcal {L}}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) is defined as \(\Vert f\Vert _{H^{p}_{{\mathcal {L}}}}:=\Vert M_{{\mathcal {L}}}(f)\Vert _{L^{p}}.\)
Let f be a locally integrable function on \({\mathbb {R}}^{n}\) and \(B=B(x,r)\) be a ball. Denote by \(f_{B}\) the mean of f on B, i.e., \(f_{B}=|B|^{-1}\int _{B}f(y){\mathrm{d}}y\). Let
where the auxiliary function \(\rho (\cdot )\) is defined as
Definition 2
Let \(0<\gamma \le 1\). The Campanato type space BMO\(^{\gamma }_{{\mathcal {L}}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) is defined as the set of all locally integrable functions f satisfying
The dual space of \(H^{n/(n+\gamma )}_{{\mathcal {L}}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\), \(0\le \gamma < 1\), is the Campanato type space BMO\(^{\gamma }_{{\mathcal {L}}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) (cf. [14, Theorem 4.5]).
2.2 The T1 criterion on Campanato type spaces
We denote by \(L^{p}_{c}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) the set of functions \(f\in L^{p}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\), \(1\le p\le \infty\), whose support \(\text { supp }(f)\) is a compact subset of \({\mathbb {R}}^{n}\).
Definition 3
Let \(0\le \beta <n\), \(1<p\le q<\infty\) with \(1/q=1/p-\beta /n\). Let T be a bounded linear operator from \(L^{p}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) into \(L^{q}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) such that
We shall say that T is a \(\beta\)-Schrödinger–Calderón–Zygmund operator with regularity exponent \(\delta >0\) if there exists a constant \(C>0\) such that
-
(i)
\(\displaystyle |K(x,y)|\le \frac{C}{|x-y|^{n-\beta }}\left( 1+\frac{|x-y|}{\rho (x)}\right) ^{-N}\) for all \(N>0\) and \(x\ne y\);
-
(ii)
\(\displaystyle |K(x,y)-K(x,z)|+|K(y,x)-K(z,x)|\le C\frac{|y-z|^{\delta }}{|x-y|^{n-\beta +\delta }}\) when \(|x-y|>2|y-z|\).
The following T1 type criterions on Campanato type spaces were established by Ma et al. [15].
Theorem 1
[15, Theorem1.1] Let T be a \(\beta\)-Schrödinger–Calderón–Zygmund operator, \(\beta \ge 0\), \(0< \beta +\gamma <\min \{1,\delta \}\), with smoothness exponent \(\delta\). Then T is a bounded operator from BMO\(^{\gamma }_{{\mathcal {L}}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) into BMO\(^{\gamma +\beta }_{{\mathcal {L}}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) if and only if there exists a constant C such that
for every ball B(x, r), \(x\in {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\) and \(0<r\le \rho (x)/2\).
When \(\gamma =0\), the authors in [15] also proved
Theorem 2
[15, Theorem1.2] Let T be a \(\beta\)-Schrödinger–Calderón–Zygmund operator, \(0\le \beta <\min \{1,\delta \}\), with smoothness exponent \(\delta\). Then T is a bounded operator from BMO\(_{{\mathcal {L}}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) into BMO\(^{\beta }_{{\mathcal {L}}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) if and only if there exists a constant C such that
for every ball B(x, r), \(x\in {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\) and \(0<r\le \rho (x)/2\).
Lemma 4
[15, Remark 4.1] Theorems 1and 2can be also stated in a vector-valued setting. If Tf takes values in a Banach space \({\mathbb {B}}\) and the absolute values in the conditions are replaced by the norm in \({\mathbb {B}}\), then both results hold.
3 Regularity estimates
3.1 Regularities of heat kernels
By the fundamental solutions of Schrödinger operators, Dziubański and Zienkiewicz proved that the heat kernel \(K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{t}(\cdot ,\cdot )\) satisfies the following estimates, see also [11].
Lemma 5
-
(i)
([6, Theorem 2.11]) For any \(N>0\), there exist constants \(C_{N},c>0\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} |K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{t}(x,y)|\le C_{N}t^{-n/2}e^{-c|x-y|^{2}/t}\left( 1+\frac{\sqrt{t}}{\rho (x)}+\frac{\sqrt{t}}{\rho (y)}\right) ^{-N}. \end{aligned}$$ -
(ii)
([8, Theorem 4.11]) Assume that \(0<\delta \le \min \{1,\delta _{0}\}.\) For any \(N>0\), there exist constants \(C_{N},c>0\) such that for all \(|h|<\sqrt{t}\),
$$\begin{aligned} \left| K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{t}(x+h,y)-K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{t}(x,y)\right| \le C_{N}\left( \frac{|h|}{\sqrt{t}}\right) ^{\delta }t^{-n/2}e^{-c|x-y|^{2}/t}\left( 1+\frac{\sqrt{t}}{\rho (x)}+ \frac{\sqrt{t}}{\rho (y)}\right) ^{-N}. \end{aligned}$$
Lemma 6
[7, Proposition 2.16] There exist constants \(C,c>0\) such that for \(x,y\in {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\) and \(t>0,\)
In [5], under the assumption that \(V\in B_{q}, q>n\), Duong et al. obtained the following regularity estimate for the kernel \(K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{t}(\cdot ,\cdot )\).
Lemma 7
[5, Lemma 3.8] Suppose that \(V\in B_{q}\) for some \(q>n\). For any \(N>0\), there exist constants \(C >0\) and \(c>0\) such that for all \(x,y\in {\mathbb {R}}^n\) and \(t>0,\)
By the perturbation theory for semigroups of operators,
Similar to [7, Proposition 2.16], we can prove the following lemma.
Lemma 8
Suppose that \(V\in B_{q}\) for some \(q>n\). There exist constants \(C,c>0\) such that
Proof
If \(t\ge \rho (y)^{2}\), it is easy to see that
If \(t<\rho (y)^{2}\), by (7), we get
where
For \(I_{1}\), it follows from Lemmas 7 and 3 that
Similar to \(I_{1}\), for the term \(I_{2}\), we can obtain
It follows from (i) of Lemma 2 that
where \(\varepsilon >0\) is an arbitrary small constant. Hence
\(\square\)
Lemma 9
[7, Proposition 2.17] Let \(0<\delta <\min \{1,\delta _{0}\}\). For every \(C'>0\) there exists a constant C such that for every \(z,x,y\in {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\), \(|y-z|\le |x-y|/4\), \(|y-z|\le C'\rho (x)\) we have
Lemma 10
Suppose that \(V\in B_{q}\) for some \(q>n\). Let \(\delta _{1}=1-n/q\) and \(0<\delta '<\delta _{1}\). For every \(C'>0\) there exists a constant C such that for every \(u,x,y\in {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\), \(|u|\le |x-y|/4\), \(|u|\le C'\rho (x)\) we have
Proof
We prove this lemma by the same argument as Lemma 8. It is enough to verify that
where \(\epsilon >0\) is an arbitrary small constant. In fact, under the condition \(|u|<|x-y|/4\), it is easy to see that \(|x-y|\sim |x+u-y|\). We can deduce from Lemma 7 that
Then, for \(\delta '\in (0,\delta _{1})\), it follows from (9) and (10) that
which gives the desired estimate.
Now we prove (9). Since the case for \(|u|\ge \rho (y)\) is trivial, we may assume \(|u|<\rho (y)\). If \(t\le 2|u|^{2}\), the required estimate follows from Lemma 8. Hence we consider the case \(t>2|u|^{2}\) only. Recall that for the classical heat kernel \(K_{t}(\cdot )\), it holds
A direct computation gives
and for \(|u|\le |x|/2\),
Similar to (8), we split
where
For \(J_{1}\), if \(t<2\rho (y)^{2}\), using Lemma 3 and (11), we get
If \(t\ge 2\rho (y)^{2}\), applying Lemmas 3 and 5, we have
where N is chosen large enough satisfying \(N>l_{0}\).
To estimate \(J_{2}\), we use Lemma 5 and write \(J_{2}\le C(J_{2,1}+J_{2,2}+J_{2,3})\), where
Notice that \(\rho (x+u)\sim \rho (x)\) as \(|u|\le \rho (x)\). It holds
where in the last inequality we have used the fact that \(\delta _{0}=2-n/q\). By Lemmas 1 and 2, we apply (11) to get
For \(J_{2,3}\), if \(t\le 2\rho (x)^{2}\), it can be deduced from Lemma 3 and (12) that
If \(t>2\rho (x)^{2}\), then
where in (13) we have used the estimate obtained for \(t\le 2\rho (x)^{2}\) and Lemma 3 for \(s\ge \rho (x)^{2}\).
By Lemma 2,
where \(\epsilon >0\) is an arbitrary small constant. Choosing N large enough in the estimates of \(J_{2,1},J_{2,2}\) and \(J_{2,3}\), we obtain (9) and hence Lemma 10 is proved.
\(\square\)
We can obtain the following estimates, which generalize [4, Lemmas 3.7 and 3.8]. We also refer to [13, (57)] for the case \(m=1\) in the setting of Heisenberg groups.
Proposition 1
-
(i)
There exist constants \(C,c>0\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} \left| t^{m}\partial _{t}^{m}K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{t}(x,y)-t^{m}\partial _{t}^{m}K_{t}(x-y)\right| \le Ct^{-n/2}e^{-c|x-y|^{2}/t}\min \left\{ \left( \frac{\sqrt{t}}{\rho (x)}\right) ^{\delta _{0}}, \left( \frac{\sqrt{t}}{\rho (y)}\right) ^{\delta _{0}}\right\} . \end{aligned}$$ -
(ii)
Let \(0<\delta <\min \{1,\delta _{0}\}\). For every \(C'>0\) there exist constants C and c such that for every \(z,x,y\in {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\), \(|y-z|\le |x-y|/4\), \(|y-z|\le C'\rho (x)\) we have
$$\begin{aligned}&\left| \left( t^{m}\partial _{t}^{m}K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{t}(x,y)-t^{m}\partial _{t}^{m}K_{t}(x-y)\right) -\left( t^{m}\partial _{t}^{m}K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{t}(x,z)-t^{m}\partial _{t}^{m}K_{t}(x-z)\right) \right| \\&\quad \le C\left( \frac{|y-z|}{\rho (y)}\right) ^{\delta }t^{-n/2}e^{-c|x-y|^{2}/t}. \end{aligned}$$
Proof
For \(t>0\) and \(m\in {\mathbb {Z}}_{+}\), define \(Q^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{t,m}(x,y):= t^{m}\partial _{t}^{m}K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{t}(x,y)\) and \(Q_{t,m}(x-y):= t^{m}\partial _{t}^{m}K_{t}(x-y).\) The proof of (i) is similar to [18, Lemmas 4.10 and 4.11], so we omit the details.
For (ii), by (7), we get
Similar to [18, Proposition 4.8], we can use a direct calculus to deduce:
-
(1)
If m is even with \(m\ge 2\), there exists a sequence of coefficients \(\{C_{m,j}\}_{m\ge 2,2\le j\le m/2}\) such that
$$\begin{aligned}&t^{m}\frac{{\mathrm{d}}^{m}}{{\mathrm{d}}t^{m}}\left\{ \left( K_{t}(x+u-y)-K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{t}(x+u,y)\right) -\left( K_{t}(x-y)-K_{t}^{{\mathcal {L}}}(x,y)\right) \right\} \nonumber \\&\quad = \frac{m+1}{2}(E_{1}+E_{2}) +\sum ^{m/2}_{j=2}(C_{m-1,j-1}+C_{m-1,j})\left( E^{j}_{3,1}+E_{3,2}^{j}\right) +E_{4}+E_{5}.\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$(14) -
(2)
If m is odd with \(m\ge 3\), there exists a sequence of coefficients \(\{C_{m,j}\}_{m\ge 3,2\le j\le [m/2]}\) such that
$$\begin{aligned}&t^{m}\frac{{\mathrm{d}}^{m}}{{\mathrm{d}}t^{m}}\left\{ \left( K_{t}(x+u-y)-K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{t}(x+u,y)\right) -\left( K_{t}(x-y)-K_{t}^{{\mathcal {L}}}(x,y)\right) \right\} \nonumber \\&\quad =\frac{m+1}{2}(E_{1}+E_{2})+ E_{4}-E_{5} +\sum ^{[m/2]}_{j=2}(C_{m-1,j-1}+C_{m-1,j})\left( E^{j}_{3,1}+E^{j}_{3,2}\right) \nonumber \\&\qquad +2C_{m,[m/2]}\frac{{\mathrm{d}}^{[m/2]}}{{\mathrm{d}}t^{[m/2]}}\left( K_{t/2}(w-(x+u))-K_{t/2}(w-x)\right) V(w)\frac{{\mathrm{d}}^{[m/2]}}{{\mathrm{d}}t^{[m/2]}}K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{t/2}(w,y).\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$(15)
Here in the above (14) and (15),
Below, for the sake of simplicity, we only estimate \(E_{1}, E_{4}, E_{5}\). The estimations for \(E_{2}\), \(E_{3,1}^{j}\), \(E^{j}_{3,2}\) are similar, and so we omit the details. By the mean value theorem, we know that there exist constants C, c such that
We divide \(E_{1}\) as \(E_{1}\le E_{1,1}+E_{1,2}\), where
If \(t<2\rho (y)^{2}\), for \(E_{1,1}\), By (16), Lemma 3 (i) and Lemma 5, we obtain
Similar to \(E_{1,1}\), by (16) again, we get
If \(t>2\rho (y)^{2}\), for \(E_{1,1}\), by (16), Lemma 3 (ii) and Lemma 5, we obtain
Similar to \(E_{1,1}\), we can also choose N large enough such that
For \(E_{4}\) and \(E_{5}\), similar to [13, Lemma 10], by Lemma 5 and (16), we can obtain
where \(\epsilon >0\) is an arbitrary small constant. Hence Proposition 1 is proved. \(\square\)
3.2 Fractional heat kernels associated with \({\mathcal {L}}\)
In the following, we will derive some regularity estimates for the fractional heat kernels related with \({\mathcal {L}}\). For \(\alpha \in (0,1)\), the fractional power of \({\mathcal {L}}\), denoted by \({\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }\), is defined as
We use the subordinative formula to express the integral kernel \(K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(\cdot ,\cdot )\) of \(e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}\) as (cf. [10])
where \(\eta ^{\alpha }_{t}(\cdot )\) satisfies
By the subordinative formula (4) and Lemma 5, Li et al. [12] proved the following estimates for \(K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(\cdot ,\cdot )\).
Proposition 2
[12, Propositions 3.1 and 3.2] Let \(0<\alpha <1\).
-
(i)
For any \(N>0\), there exists a constant \(C_{N}>0\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} \left| K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(x,y)\right| \le \frac{C_{N}t}{(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}+|x-y|)^{n+2\alpha }}\left( 1+\frac{\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}{\rho (x)}+\frac{\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}{\rho (y)}\right) ^{-N}. \end{aligned}$$ -
(ii)
Let \(0<\delta \le \min \{1,\delta _{0}\}\). For any \(N>0\), there exists a constant \(C_{N}>0\) such that for all \(|h|\le \sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}\),
$$\begin{aligned}&\left| K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(x+h,y)-K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(x,y)\right| \nonumber \\&\quad \le C_{N}\left( \frac{|h|}{\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}\right) ^{\delta }\frac{t}{(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}+|x-y|)^{n+2\alpha }} \left( 1+\frac{\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}{\rho (x}+ \frac{\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}{\rho (y)}\right) ^{-N}. \end{aligned}$$
For the kernels \({\widetilde{D}}^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(\cdot ,\cdot )\) and \(D^{{\mathcal {L}},m}_{\alpha ,t}(\cdot ,\cdot ), m\in {\mathbb {Z}}_{+}, t>0\), defined by (5), the following regularity estimates were obtained by Li et al. [12].
Proposition 3
[12, Proposition 3.3] Let \(0<\alpha <1\).
-
(i)
For every N, there is a constant \(C_{N}>0\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} \left| D_{\alpha ,t}^{{\mathcal {L}},m}(x,y)\right| \le \frac{C_{N}t}{(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}+|x-y|)^{n+2\alpha }}\left( 1+\frac{\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}{\rho (x)}+\frac{\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}{\rho (y)}\right) ^{-N}. \end{aligned}$$ -
(ii)
Let \(0<\delta <\min \{2\alpha ,\delta _{0},1\}\). For every \(N>0\), there exists a constant \(C_{N}>0\) such that, for all \(|h|<\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}\),
$$\begin{aligned}&\left| D^{{\mathcal {L}},m}_{\alpha ,t}(x+h,y)-D^{{\mathcal {L}},m}_{\alpha ,t}(x,y)\right| \nonumber \\&\quad \le C_{N}\left( \frac{h}{\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}\right) ^{\delta }\frac{t}{(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}+|x-y|)^{n+2\alpha }} \left( 1+\frac{\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}{\rho (x)}+\frac{\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}{\rho (y)}\right) ^{-N}. \end{aligned}$$ -
(iii)
There exists a constant \(C_{N}>0\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} \left| \int _{{\mathbb {R}}^{n}}D^{{\mathcal {L}},m}_{\alpha ,t}(x,y)dy\right| \le \frac{C_{N}(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}/\rho (x))^{\delta }}{(1+\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}/\rho (x))^{N}}. \end{aligned}$$
Proposition 4
[12, Propositions 3.6, 3.9 and 3.10] Suppose that and \(V\in B_{q}\) for some \(q>n\).
-
(i)
Let \(\alpha \in (0,1)\). For every N, there is a constant \(C_{N}>0\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} \left| {\widetilde{D}}_{\alpha ,t}^{{\mathcal {L}}}(x,y)\right| \le \frac{C_{N}t}{(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}+|x-y|)^{n+2\alpha }}\left( 1+\frac{\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}{\rho (x)}+\frac{\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}{\rho (y)}\right) ^{-N}. \end{aligned}$$ -
(ii)
Let \(\alpha \in (0,1)\) and \(\delta _{1}=1-n/q\). For every \(N>0\), there exists a constant \(C_{N}>0\) such that for all \(|h|<\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}\),
$$\begin{aligned}&\left| {\widetilde{D}}^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(x+h,y)-{\widetilde{D}}^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(x,y)\right| \nonumber \\&\quad \le C_{N}\left( \frac{h}{\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}\right) ^{\delta _{1}}\frac{t}{(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}+|x-y|)^{n+2\alpha }} \left( 1+\frac{\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}{\rho (x)}+\frac{\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}{\rho (y)}\right) ^{-N}. \end{aligned}$$ -
(iii)
Let \(\alpha \in (0, 1/2-n/2q)\). There exists a constant \(C_{N}>0\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} \left| \int _{{\mathbb {R}}^{n}}{\widetilde{D}}^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(x,y){\mathrm{d}}y\right| \le C_{N}\min \left\{ \left( \frac{\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}{\rho (x)}\right) ^{1+2\alpha },\ \left( \frac{\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}{\rho (x)}\right) ^{-N}\right\} . \end{aligned}$$
To establish the BMO\(^{\gamma }_{L}\)-boundedness of operators via T1 type theorem, we need the following propositions.
Proposition 5
There exists a constant \(C>0\) such that
Proof
By the subordinative formula (4) and Lemma 6, we obtain
On the one hand, letting \(s=t^{1/\alpha }u\), we can get
Applying the change of variables: \({|x-y|^{2}}/{(t^{1/\alpha }u)}=r^{2}\), we deduce that
On the other hand, taking \(\tau =s/t^{1/\alpha }\), we obtain
If \(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}\le |x-y|\), then
If \(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}>|x-y|\), we can see that
\(\square\)
Let \({\widetilde{D}}_{\alpha ,t}(\cdot )=t^{1/(2\alpha )}\nabla _{x}e^{-t(-\varDelta )^{\alpha }}(\cdot ).\) Similar to the proof of Proposition 5, by (4) and Lemma 8, we have
Proposition 6
There exists a constant \(C>0\) such that
Let \(D^{m}_{\alpha ,t}(\cdot )=t^{m}\partial ^{m}_{t}e^{-t(-\varDelta )^{\alpha }}(\cdot ).\) We have
Proposition 7
There exists a constant \(C>0\) such that
Proof
The proposition can be proved by Proposition 1 and (4). Since the argument is similar to that of Proposition 5, the details is omitted. \(\square\)
Proposition 8
Let \(0<\delta <\min \{2\alpha ,\delta _{0}\}\). For every \(C'>0\) there exists a constant C such that for every \(z,x,y\in {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\), \(|y-z|\le |x-y|/4\), \(|y-z|\le C'\rho (y)\) we have
Proof
By the subordinative formula (4), we can use Lemma 9 to deduce
On the one hand, taking \(s=t^{1/\alpha }u\), we obtain
Let \(\displaystyle \frac{|x-y|^{2}}{(t^{1/\alpha }u)}=r\). We can see that
On the other hand, letting \(\displaystyle \frac{s}{t^{1/\alpha }}=\tau\), we obtain
Case 1: \(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}\le |x-y|\). We obtain
Case 2: \(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}>|x-y|\). We can see that
\(\square\)
Proposition 9
Let \(0<\delta <\min \{2\alpha ,\delta _{0}\}\). For every \(C'>0\) there exists a constant C such that for every \(z,x,y\in {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\), \(|y-z|\le |x-y|/4\), \(|y-z|\le C'\rho (y)\) we have
Proof
The proof is similar to that of Proposition 8, so we omit the details. \(\square\)
Proposition 10
Suppose that \(V\in B_{q}\) for some \(q>n\). Let \(0<\delta '<\delta _{1}:=1-n/q\). For every \(C'>0\) there exists a constant C such that for every \(z,x,y\in {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\), \(|y-z|\le |x-y|/4\), \(|y-z|\le C'\rho (y)\) we have
Proof
The proof is similar to that of Proposition 8, so we omit the details. \(\square\)
4 BMO\(^{\gamma }_{{\mathcal {L}}}\)-boundedness via T1 theorem
4.1 Maximal operators for fractional heat semigroups
Definition 4
Let \(0<\gamma \le 1\). The Campanato type space BMO\(^{\gamma }_{{\mathcal {L}},L^{\infty }((0,\infty ),{\mathrm{d}}t)}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) is defined as the set of all locally integrable functions f satisfying
To prove that \(M^{\alpha }_{{\mathcal {L}}}\) is bounded from BMO\(_{{\mathcal {L}}}^{\gamma }({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\), \(0<\gamma <\min \{2\alpha ,\delta _{0},1 \}\), into itself, we give a vector-valued interpretation of the operator and apply Lemma 4. Indeed, it is clear that \(M^{\alpha }_{{\mathcal {L}}}f=\Vert e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}f\Vert _{L^{\infty }((0,\infty ),{\mathrm{d}}t)}\). Hence, it is enough to show that the operator \(\varLambda (f):=\{e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}f\}_{t>0}\) is bounded from BMO\(^{\gamma }_{{\mathcal {L}}}\) into BMO\(_{{\mathcal {L}},L^{\infty }((0,\infty ),{\mathrm{d}}t)}^{\gamma }\).
By the spectral theorem, \(\varLambda\) is bounded from \(L^{2}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) into \(L^{2}_{L^{\infty }((0,\infty ),{\mathrm{d}}t)}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\). The desired result can be then deduced from the following theorem.
Theorem 3
Assume that the potential \(V\in B_{q}\) with \(q>n/2\). Let \(x,y,z\in {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\).
-
(i)
For any \(N>0\), there exists a constant \(C_{N}\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} \left\| K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(x,y)\right\| _{L^{\infty }((0,\infty ),{\mathrm{d}}t)}\le \frac{C_{N}}{|x-y|^{n}}\left( 1+\frac{|x-y|}{\rho (x)}+\frac{|x-y|}{\rho (y)}\right) ^{-N}. \end{aligned}$$ -
(ii)
For \(|x-y|>2|y-z|\) and any \(0<\delta <\min \{2\alpha ,\delta _{0}\}\), there exists a constant \(C>0\) such that
$$\begin{aligned}&\left\| K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(x,y)-K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(x,z)\left\| _{L^{\infty }((0,\infty ),{\mathrm{d}}t)}+ \right\| K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(y,x)-K^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(z,x)\right\| _{L^{\infty }((0,\infty ),{\mathrm{d}}t)}\nonumber \\&\quad \le \frac{C|y-z|^{\delta }}{|x-y|^{n+\delta }}. \end{aligned}$$(20) -
(iii)
There exists a constant C such that for every ball \(B=B(x,r)\) with \(0<r\le \rho (x)/2\),
$$\begin{aligned} \log \left( \frac{\rho (x)}{r}\right) \frac{1}{|B|}\int _{B}\left\| e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}1(y)-(e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}1)_{B}\right\| _{L^{\infty }((0,\infty ),{\mathrm{d}}t)}{\mathrm{d}}y\le C, \end{aligned}$$and, if \(\gamma <\min \{2\alpha ,1,\delta _{0}\}\) then
$$\begin{aligned} \left( \frac{\rho (x)}{r}\right) ^{\gamma }\frac{1}{|B|}\int _{B}\left\| e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}1(y)-(e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}1)_{B}\right\| _{L^{\infty }((0,\infty ),{\mathrm{d}}t)}{\mathrm{d}}y\le C. \end{aligned}$$
Proof
For (i), from (i) of Proposition 2, we can get
If \(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}>|x-y|\), then
If \(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}\le |x-y|\), we obtain
For (ii), from (ii) of Proposition 2, we obtain
If \(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}>|x-y|\), then
If \(|x-y|>\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}\), we can also get
The symmetry of the kernel \(K^{L}_{\alpha ,t}(\cdot ,\cdot )\) gives the conclusion of (ii).
For (iii), letting \(B=B(x,r)\) with \(0<r\le \rho (x)/2\), the triangle inequality gives
We estimate \(\Vert e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}1(y)-e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}1(z)\Vert _{L^{\infty }((0,\infty ),{\mathrm{d}}t)}\). Because \(y,z\in B\), \(\rho (y)\sim \rho (z)\sim \rho (x).\) By Proposition 5, we split \(|e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}1(y)-e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}1(z)|\le S_{1}+S_{2}\), where
For \(S_{1}\), if \(|y-w|\le \sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}\), we obtain
If \(|y-w|>\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}\), we can see that
where we have chosen \(\delta _{0}<2\alpha\) since \(\delta _{0}=2-n/q\), \(q>n/2\). The proof of the term \(S_{2}\) is similar to that of the term \(S_{1}\), so we omit it. Then we can get
which shows that if \(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}\le 2r\),
If \(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}>2r\), then \(|y-z|\le 2r<\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}\). Hence, Proposition 2 implies that for \(0<\delta <\delta _{0}\),
Therefore, if \(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}>\rho (x)\), (21) gives
When \(2r<\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}<\rho (x)\), we have \(|e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}1(y)-e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}1(z)| = {\mathrm{I}}+{\mathrm{II}}+{\mathrm{III}},\) where
Notice that the estimate (20) is valid for the classical fractional heat kernel. For I, by (20), we can get
For II, we apply Proposition 8 and the fact that \(\rho (w)\sim \rho (y)\) in the region of integration to deduce that
For III, since \(|y-z|\le 2r<\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }},\) we have \(|w-y|<C\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}\). For \(n-\delta _{0}>0\), by Proposition 5, we obtain
Thus, when \(2r<\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}<\rho (x)\),
Combining the above estimates, we can get
Therefore, it holds
which is the first conclusion of (iii).
For the second estimate of (iii), take \(\delta \in (\gamma ,\ \min \{2\alpha ,\ 2-n/q\})\). By (22), we have
\(\square\)
4.2 Boundedness of the Littlewood–Paley g-function \(g^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha }\)
Similar to Sect. 4.1, we introduce the following function space:
Definition 5
Let \(0<\gamma \le 1\). The Campanato type space BMO\(^{\gamma }_{ {\mathcal {L}},L^{2}((0,\infty ),{\mathrm{d}}t/t)}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) is defined as the set of all locally integrable functions f satisfying
The functional calculus and the spectral theorem imply that \(g^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha }\) is an isometry on \(L^{2}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\). As before, to get the boundedness of \(g^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha }\) on BMO\(^{\gamma }_{{\mathcal {L}}}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\), \(0<\gamma <\min \{2\alpha ,\delta _{0},1\}\), it is sufficient to prove the following result.
Theorem 4
Assume that the potential \(V\in B_{q}\) with \(q>n/2\). Let \(x,y,z\in {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\) and \(N>0\).
-
(i)
For any \(N>0\), there exists a constant \(C_{N}\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} \left\| D^{{\mathcal {L}},m}_{\alpha ,t}(x,y)\right\| _{L^{2}((0,\infty ),\frac{{\mathrm{d}}t}{t})}\le \frac{C_{N}}{|x-y|^{n}}\left( 1+\frac{|x-y|}{\rho (x)}+\frac{|x-y|}{\rho (y)}\right) ^{-N}. \end{aligned}$$ -
(ii)
If \(|x-y|>2|y-z|\) and \(0<\delta <\min \{2\alpha ,\delta _{0},1\}\), there exists a constant C such that
$$\begin{aligned}&\left\| D^{{\mathcal {L}},m}_{\alpha ,t}(x,y)-D^{{\mathcal {L}},m}_{\alpha ,t}(x,z)\right\| _{L^{2}((0,\infty ),\frac{{\mathrm{d}}t}{t})}+ \left\| D^{{\mathcal {L}},m}_{\alpha ,t}(y,x)-D^{{\mathcal {L}},m}_{\alpha ,t}(z,x)\right\| _{L^{2}\left( (0,\infty ),\frac{{\mathrm{d}}t}{t}\right) }\nonumber \\&\quad \le {{C}}\frac{|y-z|^{\delta }}{|x-y|^{n+\delta }}. \end{aligned}$$(23) -
(iii)
There exists a constant C such that for every ball \(B=B(x_{0},r)\) with \(0<r\le \rho (x)/2\),
$$\begin{aligned} \log \left( \frac{\rho (x)}{r}\right) \frac{1}{|B|}\int _{B}\left\| t^{m}\partial _{t}^{m}e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}1(y)- (t^{m}\partial _{t}^{m}e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}1)_{B}\right\| _{L^{2}\left( (0,\infty ),\frac{{\mathrm{d}}t}{t}\right) }{\mathrm{d}}y\le C, \end{aligned}$$and, if \(\gamma <\min \{2\alpha ,\delta _{0},1\}\), then
$$\begin{aligned} \left( \frac{\rho (x)}{r}\right) ^{\gamma }\frac{1}{|B|}\int _{B}\left\| t^{m}\partial _{t}^{m}e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}1(y)-(t^{m}\partial _{t}^{m} e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}1)_{B}\right\| _{L^{2}\left( (0,\infty ),\frac{{\mathrm{d}}t}{t}\right) }{\mathrm{d}}y\le C. \end{aligned}$$
Proof
For (i), from Proposition 3, we have
If \(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}\le |x-y|\), we obtain
Let \({\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}/{|x-y|}=u\). We can see that
If \(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}\ge |x-y|\), we can get
For (ii), by Proposition 3, we have
Let \({\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}/{|x-y|}=u\). We obtain
The symmetry of the kernel \(D^{L,m}_{\alpha ,t}(\cdot ,\cdot )\) gives the conclusion of (ii).
For (iii), let us fix \(y,z\in B=B(x_{0},r)\), \(0<r\le \rho (x_{0})/2\). Similar to Theorem 3, we must handle
We can write
where
Since \(y,z\in B\subset B(x_{0},\rho (x_{0}))\), it follows that \(\rho (y)\sim \rho (x_{0})\sim \rho (z)\). By Proposition 3 (iii),
Also, by Proposition 3(ii),
It remains to estimate the term \(M_{2}\). In this case, \(|y-z|\le 2r\le \sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}\le \rho (x_{0})\). Then we can use the methods in Theorem 3 to obtain
where
For \(M_{2,1}\), similar to prove (23), we can also get
which is valid to \(D^{m}_{\alpha ,t}(\cdot )\). So we obtain
For \(M_{2,2}\), by Proposition 9 and the fact that \(\rho (x)\sim \rho (y)\) in the region of integration.
For \(M_{2,3}\), since \(|y-z|\le 2r<\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }},\) we have \(|x-y|<C\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}\). For \(n-\delta _{0}>0\), by Proposition 7, we obtain
The estimates for \(M_{2,i}, i=1,2,3\), imply that
Finally, we can get
Thus (iii) readily follows. \(\square\)
4.3 Boundedness of Littlewood–Paley g-function \({\widetilde{g}}^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha }\)
By the \(L^{2}\)-boundedness of Riesz transforms \(\nabla _{x}{\mathcal {L}}^{-1/2}\), we can see that
Then by the spectral theorem, we know that \({\widetilde{g}}^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha }\) is bounded from \(L^{2}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\) into \(L^{2}({\mathbb {R}}^{n})\).
Theorem 5
Assume that the potential \(V\in B_{q}\) with \(q>n\). Let \(x,y,z\in {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\).
-
(i)
For any \(N>0\), there exists a constant \(C_{N}\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} \left\| {\widetilde{D}}^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(x,y)\right\| _{L^{2}\left( (0,\infty ),\frac{{\mathrm{d}}t}{t}\right) }\le \frac{C_{N}}{|x-y|^{n}}\left( 1+\frac{|x-y|}{\rho (x)}+\frac{|x-y|}{\rho (y)}\right) ^{-N}; \end{aligned}$$ -
(ii)
Let \(|x-y|>2|y-z|\) and \(0<\delta <\min \{2\alpha ,\delta _{1},1\}\). There exists a constant C such that
$$\begin{aligned}&\left\| {\widetilde{D}}^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(x,y)-{\widetilde{D}}^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(x,z)\right\| _{L^{2}\left( (0,\infty ),\frac{{\mathrm{d}}t}{t}\right) }\\&\quad + \left\| {\widetilde{D}}^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(y,x)-{\widetilde{D}}^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(z,x)\right\| _{L^{2}\left( (0,\infty ),\frac{{\mathrm{d}}t}{t}\right) }\le {{C}}\frac{|y-z|^{\delta }}{|x-y|^{n+\delta }}; \end{aligned}$$ -
(iii)
There exists a constant C such that for every ball \(B=B(x_{0},r)\) with \(0<r\le \rho (x)/2\),
$$\begin{aligned} \log \left( \frac{\rho (x)}{r}\right) \frac{1}{|B|}\int _{B}\left\| t^{1/(2\alpha )}\nabla _{x} e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}1(y)-(t^{1/(2\alpha )}\nabla _{x}e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}1)_{B}\right\| _{L^{2}\left( (0,\infty ),\frac{{\mathrm{d}}t}{t}\right) }{\mathrm{d}}y\le C, \end{aligned}$$and, if \(\gamma <\min \{2\alpha ,\delta _{1},1\}\) then
$$\begin{aligned} \left( \frac{\rho (x)}{r}\right) ^{\gamma }\frac{1}{|B|}\int _{B}\left\| t^{1/(2\alpha )}\nabla _{x} e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}1(y)-(t^{1/(2\alpha )}\nabla _{x}e^{-t{\mathcal {L}}^{\alpha }}1)_{B}\right\| _{L^{2}\left( (0,\infty ),\frac{{\mathrm{d}}t}{t}\right) }{\mathrm{d}}y\le C. \end{aligned}$$
Proof
For (i), from Proposition 4, we have
If \(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}\le |x-y|\), we obtain
Let \(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}/|x-y|=u\). We can see that
If \(\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}\ge |x-y|\), we can get
which proves (i).
For (ii), by Proposition 4, we have
Let \({\sqrt{t^{1/\alpha }}}/{|x-y|}=u\). We obtain
The symmetry of the kernel \(D^{{\mathcal {L}}}_{\alpha ,t}(\cdot ,\cdot )\) gives the desired conclusion of (ii).
For (iii), fix \(y,z\in B=B(x_{0},r)\) with \(0<r\le \rho (x_{0})/2\). Similar to Theorem 4, we need to deal with the term
first. Write
where
Since \(y,z\in B\subset B(x_{0},\rho (x_{0}))\), then \(\rho (y)\sim \rho (x_{0})\sim \rho (z)\). It follows from Proposition 4 (iii) that
Also, we apply Proposition 4 (ii) to deduce that
Then for \(G_{2}\), following the procedure of the treatment for \(M_{2}\) in Theorem 4, we obtain
From the above estimates, we can get
Thus (iii) readily follows. \(\square\)
References
Bennett, C., DeVore, R.A., Sharpley, R.: Weak-\(L^{\infty }\) and BMO. Ann. Math. 113, 601–611 (1981)
Betancor, J., Crescimbeni, R., Fariña, J., Stinga, P., Torrea, J.: A \(T1\) criterion for Hermite–Calderón–Zygmund operators on the BMO\(_{H}({mathbb{R}}^{n})\) space and applications. Ann. Sc. Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. 12, 157–187 (2013)
Bui, H., Duong, X., Yan, L.: Calderón reproducing formulas and new Besov spaces associated with operators. Adv. Math. 229, 2449–2502 (2012)
Chao, Z., Torrea, J.: Boundedness of differential transforms for heat semigroups generated by Schrödinger operators. Can. J. Math. 73, 622–655 (2021)
Duong, X., Yan, L., Zhang, C.: On characterization of Poisson integrals of Schrödinger operators with BMO traces. J. Funct. Anal. 266, 2053–2085 (2014)
Dziubański, J., Zienkiewicz, J.: Hardy space \(H^ 1\) associated to Schrödinger operator with potential satisfying reverse Hölder inequality. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 15, 279–296 (1999)
Dziubański, J., Zienkiewicz, J.: \(H^{p}\) Spaces for Schrödinger operators. Fourier Anal. Relat. Top. Banach Cent. Publ. 56, 45–53 (2002)
Dziubański, J., Zienkiewicz, J.: \(H_p\) spaces associated with Schrödinger operators with potentials from reverse Hölder classes. Colloq. Math. 98, 5–36 (2003)
Dziubański, J., Garrigós, G., Martínez, T., Torrea, J., Zienkiewicz, J.: BMO spaces related to Schrödinger operators with potentials satisfying a reverse Hölder inequality. Math. Z. 249, 329–356 (2005)
Grigor’yan, A.: Heat kernels and function theory on metric measure spaces. Contemp. Math. 338, 143–172 (2002)
Kurata, K.: An estimate on the heat kernel of magnetic Schrödinger operators and uniformly elliptic operators with non-negative potentials. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 62, 885–903 (2000)
Li, P., Wang, Z., Qian, T., Zhang, C.: Regularity of fractional heat semigroup associated with Schrödinger operators. Preprint available at arXiv:2012.07234
Lin, C., Liu, H.: BMO\(_{L}({\mathbb{H}}^{n})\) spaces and Carleson measures for Schrödinger operators. Adv. Math. 228, 1631–1688 (2011)
Ma, T., Stinga, P., Torrea, J., Zhang, C.: Regularity properties of Schrödinger operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 338, 817–837 (2012)
Ma, T., Stinga, P., Torrea, J., Zhang, C.: Regularity estimates in Hölder spaces for Schrödinger operators via \(T1\) theorem. Ann. Mat. Pur. Appl. 193, 561–589 (2014)
Shen, Z.: \(L^{p}\) estimates for Schrödinger operators with certain potentials. Ann. Inst. Fourier. 45, 513–546 (1995)
Stein, E.: Harmonic Analysis: Real Variable Methods, Orthogonality and Oscillatory Integrals. Princeton Mathematics Serises, vol. 43. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1993)
Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Sun, C., Li, P.: Carleson measure characterizations of the Campanato type space associated with Schrödinger operators on stratified Lie groups. Forum Math. 32, 1337–1373 (2020)
Yang, D., Yang, D., Zhou, Y.: Localized Campanato-type spaces related to admissible functions on \(RD\)-spaces and applications to Schröodinger operators. Nagoya Math. J. 198, 77–119 (2010)
Yang, D., Yang, D., Zhou, Y.: Localized BMO and BLO spaces on \(RD\)-spaces and applications to Schrödinger operators. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 9, 779–812 (2010)
Acknowledgements
P. Li was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 12071272) and Shandong Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. ZR2020MA004, ZR2017JL008). C. Zhang was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 11971431), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. LY18A010006) and the first Class Discipline of Zhejiang-A(Zhejiang Gongshang University-Statistics).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Jan van Neerven.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Z., Li, P. & Zhang, C. Boundedness of operators generated by fractional semigroups associated with Schrödinger operators on Campanato type spaces via T1 theorem. Banach J. Math. Anal. 15, 64 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43037-021-00148-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43037-021-00148-4