Abstract
A thermochemical conversion method known as hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is appealing, because it may convert wet biomass directly into energy and chemicals without the need for pre-drying. The hydrochar solid product’s capacity to prepare precursors of activated carbon has attracted attention. HTC has been utilized to solve practical issues and produce desired carbonaceous products on a variety of generated wastes, including municipal solid waste, algae, and sludge in addition to the typically lignocellulose biomass used as sustainable feedstock. This study aims to assess the in-depth description of hydrothermal carbonization, highlighting the most recent findings with regard to the technological mechanisms and practical advantages. The process parameters, which include temperature, water content, pH, and retention time, determine the characteristics of the final products. The right setting of parameters is crucial, since it significantly affects the characteristics of hydrothermal products and opens up a range of opportunities for their use in multiple sectors. Findings reveal that the type of precursor, retention time, and temperature at which the reaction is processed were discovered to be the main determinants of the HTC process. Lower solid products are produced at higher temperatures; the carbon concentration rises, while the hydrogen and oxygen content declines. Current knowledge gaps, fresh views, and associated recommendations were offered to fully use the HTC technique's enormous potential and to provide hydrochar with additional useful applications in the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
3/4 of the planet is comprised of water of which less than 1% of water on earth is exclusively for our use. For example, the total amount of water on earth is equivalent to hundred gallons, of which two gallons are ice and remaining 97 gallons are salt water. Nowadays, there is widespread concern over the depletion of such a valuable resource. A water crisis results when a region's supply of potable water is insufficient to meet demand [1].
In recent years, high population rate and rapid industrialization have significantly polluted the environment. One of the most vital sources necessary for human survival is water, which is becoming more contaminated by organic pollutants like dyes and heavy metal ions. Even toxic pollutants in water bodies with low concentrations can possess serious risk to the health of people and the environment [2]. The World Health Organization (WHO) establishes the international guidelines for the quality of drinking water that serve as a guide for various regulatory organizations in setting standards. The primary goal of this recommendation is to safeguard public's health in terms of security of drinking water [3].
The recent rise in water contamination is mostly the result of advanced technology being used in numerous industrial sectors that produce a diverse range of products. Living systems on Earth require the existence of freshwater bodies. Despite the fact that 70% of the globe is filled with water, just 3% of it is clean water that is fit for human use. In addition, the release of toxic pollutants, such as pesticides, herbicides, pharmaceuticals, phenols, organic dyes, and heavy metals, threatens this small amount of freshwater that is still in existence [4].
The public has always been concerned about environmental pollution, particularly water pollution. Wastewater that is contaminated with metal and comes from a variety of sectors, like agriculture, industries like tannery, textile dyes, nuclear, battery, mining, etc. The environment and human health have always been at risk from contaminants like domestic sewage. The most immediate effects on the environment are the destruction of aquatic habitat, the degradation of soil, which reduces crop yields, and the likelihood that heavy metals existing in contaminated water are absorbed by plants, where they enter food chains and harm animals and humans [5]. The spread of water-borne infections is one of the main consequences of water pollution. The impact of drinking untreated water will have catastrophic impact. The degradation of the dynamic ecosystems is another risky outcome. The food chain is further affected by water pollution. Untreated wastewater releases pollutants into the environment and poses health hazards when ingested. As a result, wastewater treatment is now essential. If the treated water is released, it will improve the water bodies' quality rather than pollute them. Reclaimed water could be used in number ways to enhance its productivity [1].
In recent years, the need for clean water for domestic use has also been accelerated by factors, such as rapid urbanization, rising global population, and climatic change. As a result, water treatment facilities are obligated to ensure that treated effluents discharged into the environment meet local water quality standards [6]. As a result, wastewater treatment is required to address issues of global water scarcity, poor water quality, and scarcity of water. Consistently, around 14000 demise are connected to the issue of water contamination. Effective treatment methods like electro-dialysis, precipitation, electro coagulation, ion exchange, adsorption, chemical oxidation, membrane filtration, etc. have emerged as a result of this to get rid of pollutants in wastewater that are harmful and toxic [7]. Adsorption has emerged as the technique that has received the greatest recognition as a sustainable technology for treating wastewater on a worldwide scale [8]. The target molecule adheres to the particular surface of the adsorbent, causing adsorption to occur. The effectiveness of the adsorption is determined by the interfacial contact between the adsorbate and the constitutional species of the adsorbent [9].
Despite many technical advancements and successes, wastewater treatment is still a significant problem on a global scale. Heavy metals in wastewater must be removed, because, if improperly managed, they pose a major risk to human health. For the ecosystem and the welfare of people, heavy metal removal from effluent is crucial [10].
Every technique has its difficulties, whether they relate to the economy or ultimate safe disposal. Because the metal ions cannot be changed into harmful species, it must be reduced to a very small amount for reuse, recovery, or final disposal. To maintain environmental safety, it is required to remove the hazardous substances. The problems with the environment brought on by untreated industrial streams have been addressed in a number of ways [3].
Certainly, the most important step in processing wastewater using the adsorption approach is selecting the right adsorbent. This is done to achieve the best effectiveness of waste removal as well as to choose an adsorbent that is both economical and environmentally safe. Regarding efficiency in large-scale adsorption, hydrochar has shown to be the best-chosen adsorbent [8].
At temperatures within 180 and 260 °C inside a pressure vessel, the thermochemical process known as HTC transforms fresh biomass into rich products, such as the carbon-rich solid hydrochar, liquid bio-oil, and gases. The fundamental benefit of the HTC method versus other thermochemical ones such as gasification and pyrolysis is that since this procedure is carried out in aqueous medium, no expensive pre-drying step is necessary, making it more affordable. High productivity and product quality, simplicity of use, and lower environmental hazards are further benefits associated with this method [11]. Normally 35–80% of the hydrochar produced by the HTC process. The autoclave develops pressure at temperatures between 180 and 250 °C, which causes the water in the system to be in a subcritical condition and have a high H+ content. This creates an environment that is favorable for the biomass feedstock to dehydrate and decarboxylate into hydrochar [7]. By boosting hydrophobic characteristics, lowering volatile and oxygen contents, and enhancing energy density, HTC appears to be a viable option for improving wet, low-value fuels [12]. Hydrochar has lesser quantity of heavy metals and better thermal value than pyrolytic biochar, and it may be produced without pyrolysis using HTC. While HTC produced hydrochar with more aliphatic structures and lower thermal stability, pyrolysis produced biochar with more aromatic structures and better thermal stability [13].
The term “hydrochar” refers to biochar formed from HTC, and it has a lot of oxygen-containing functional groups on its surfaces, which helps it absorb contaminants. The porous nature of hydrochar is enhanced by raising the residence time and temperature, which raises the possibility of using hydrochar as an adsorbent [14]. Due to its smaller quantity of oxygen-containing functional groups and mineral components, several investigations have concluded that hydrochar has a poorer adsorption capability for heavy metals than pyrolyzed biochar [15]. Hydrochar quality varies immensely, owing to the wide variety of precursor material, the intricate nature of HTC reactions and thus requires characterization [16]. Regarding the generation of functionalized carbon materials as well as the numerous possible uses of hydrochar in the fields of energy conservation and safeguarding the environment, hydrochar's prospective advantages and applications have attracted a lot of interest in recent years [17].
There are a ton of various words used to describe the solid byproducts of thermochemical conversion processes, since there are no standardized definitions for them. It is crucial to differentiate between words like hydrochar, biochar, and charcoal depending on the raw materials and usage. The term “biochar” is a synonym for “charcoal” whenever utilized for soil applications. Charcoal is a solid, carbon-rich substance formed when natural organic materials are carbonized. It is primarily used to provide energy through burning. The word hydrochar, on the other hand, is comparable to biochar but is created hydrothermally, leading to distinct substance. In dry carbonization methods like pyrolysis, biochar is often generated as a solid product, whereas hydrochar is typically formed as a solid–liquid combination [18].
Utilizing hydrothermal liquefaction, HTC, and pyrolysis methods, waste biomass may be converted into char with significant pore volume and specific surface area that is superior to raw biomass. The use of char-based adsorbents to remove contaminants from wastewater and water has grown in favor in recent years. The feasibility of char-based adsorbents on an industrial scale was predicted and evaluated using a variety of contemporary techniques, such as machine learning. Several techno-economic assessments were carried out for the broad range of waste management solutions on a commercial basis [19].
The generation of activated carbons from hydrothermally treated biomasses, such as sawdust, coconut shells, rice husks, maize cobs, and rice straw, is the subject of several investigations. These precursors are activated to produce extremely porous activated carbons, whose huge surface areas make it easier for them to function as adsorbents. Since it allows for significant mass transfer and adsorbate loading, high porosity is highly desirable for improved adsorbent performance. The textural characteristics of activated carbons are influenced by varied activation conditions, such as temperature and activating agent concentration, making them appropriate for a variety of applications [20].
Three distinct saccharides like kraft pulp, βcyclodextrin, and glucose were combined in a straightforward HTC method to create saccharide-based hydrochars with excellent adsorption capabilities. The hydrochars’ adsorption behavior was investigated using methylene blue as an ideal contaminant. Because of its highly negative surface charge and macropore, the glucose-based hydrochar had a greater ability to adsorb than the other hydrochar [21]. Because of its limited porosity and surface area, hydrochar formed from rice straw may not be as effective in decontaminating the environment as it could be. Hydrochar is a carbon substance with several functional groups involving oxygen on its surface. Potassium carbonate may be used to activate this hydrochar, and as a result, this substance is referred to as activated carbon. Using a hydrothermal co-precipitation procedure, this activated carbon may be transformed into magnetic carbon material. The hydrochar's porosity and adsorption capacity are boosted as a result of this magnetization and chemical activation. With its quick sorption ability and surface area, this magnetically activated hydrochar helps remove triclosan from effluent. Furthermore, using an external magnetic field, it is simple to recover magnetic hydrochar from effluent [22].
Biomass characteristics and reaction processing variables have a significant impact on the physicochemical and structural characteristics of hydrochar. Yet, a number of trial-and-error experiments are necessary to determine the ideal processing variable for a given biomass feedstock. It is difficult to properly characterize the quality and amount of hydrochar generated from biomass HTC, since such investigations are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and expensive. Moreover, because of the intricate control mechanisms that drive the HTC process, current computational methods cannot accurately anticipate the characteristics of hydrochar. To ensure hydrochar's appropriateness for diverse applications, it is imperative to develop more efficient and effective ways to ascertain its physicochemical and structural features. Using modern data-science techniques like machine learning (ML) technology, which can untangle, measure, and comprehend huge and complex datasets in bioenergy production systems, it is feasible to overcome the aforementioned difficulties [23].
The class of ML techniques known as artificial neural networks (ANNs) is capable of learning mathematical models from empirical information without being aware of the exact mathematical connections between the inputs and outputs. They are categorized as a "black box." The use of ANNs in the thermochemical field is now attracting a great deal of attention for a variety of applications, including the estimation of product mass yields from HTC of biogas digestate, anticipation of the gasification characteristics of municipal solid wastes, forecasting of gas composition and product yields from biomass gasification, and the assessment of biomass pyrolysis and gasification processes. Support vector regression and random forest techniques were used to analyze the energy densification, energy recovery, yield, and heating value of hydrochar and pyrochar. Significant results were seen, with an average R2 of 0.94 for pyrochar and 0.9 for hydrochar [24]. Parthasarathy and co-workers used a model developed using ML to predict the characteristics of fuel hydrochar. Based on 281 data points, the authors chose an ensemble support vector machine (E-SVM) as the classifier in conjunction with the slime mode algorithm (SMA) for optimisation. To create and evaluate the model, three datasets were combined: cow dung, leftovers, and sewage sludge. The average R2 and RMSE for the suggested ESVM_SMA model were 0.94 and 2.62, respectively [25].
This review highlights shortages of information and potential future directions for hydrochar research by compiling studies that have already been done on the production and use of hydrochar. The importance of this review is to identify the potential precursors for producing hydrochar using the conventional hydrothermal method in contrast to other methods currently in use, the process variables affecting hydrochar formation, and using the generated hydrochar for a wide range of applications is highlighted. The novelty of is brought about by highlighting the importance of various kinds of machine learning technique which is used to estimate the product yields resulting from HTC process.
2 Hydrochar
Hydrochar is the term for the solid byproduct from HTC [26]. Hydrochar, a black solid remnant with carbon as the primary structure and a larger fraction of oxygen functional groups (OFG), is produced by a hydrothermal reaction using organic wastes or its compounds as the raw material, water as the solvent, and oxygen as the reaction medium [27]. Due to abundance, affordability, and sustainability of its feedstocks, hydrochar has gained a lot of attention [28].
Hydrochar produced from biomasses via HTC is utilized to improve soil fertility, to hold onto water, fuel, and as an adsorbent [26]. Thermochemically converted hydrochars and activated carbons are all pyrogenic materials that contain some organic carbon [29]. The hydrochar is also a good starter for producing activated carbons through chemical or physical activation due to its low aromatization degree and specific oxygen activity [30]. Hydrochar has a high affinity for water due to the presence of OFG on its surface and can be utilized to improve soil's ability to retain water [31]. Due to hydrochar's water-washing effect during HTC and the presence of water-soluble inorganic compounds, the ash percentage of hydrochar was lower than that of biochar [32]. Hydrochar and biochar are both somewhat similar products; however, hydrochar is made under entirely distinct pre-treatment conditions. Biochar is often made as a solid residue material in a dry carbonization process like pyrolysis, whereas hydrochar is frequently created as slurry-a two-phase mixture of solid and liquid through hydrothermal carbonization [33].
As a new adsorbent for organic contaminants in polluted water, hydrochar appears to have two environmental advantages: first it recycles waste; second, it can be used to remove contaminants. Numerous chemical processes, including aromatization, polymerization, condensation, decarboxylation, dehydration, and hydrolysis, result in the formation of hydrochar. Based on the pore structure, surface area and surface OFG hydrochar is applied in adsorption [34]. Since hydrochar has a high degree of friability and hydrophobicity, it can be easily removed from liquid products. Based on the many types of biomass used, hydrochar has been widely used for soil improvement, wastewater pollution abatement, bioenergy production, and carbon sequestration [17]. However, this substance could potentially be used in other applications such as catalysis [35].
Due to its exceptional qualities as an economical and ecologically acceptable sorbent for the elimination of contaminants from the aqueous phase, hydrochar has grabbed the attention of the scientific community. A range of biomass feedstocks, including agricultural residues, sewage sludge, manure, and microalgae, have been utilized in the production of hydrochar [15]. The performance and characteristics of hydrochar are greatly influenced by the feedstock and thermochemical treatment conditions [36].
Recent studies have shown that hydrochar produced via wet chemical reaction with renewable biomass differs from char produced from pyrolysis. As a result, hydrochar preparation for energy storage, environmental benefit assessment, activation for environmental mediation, and property optimization has received increasing attention [37]. Biochar and hydrochar can both perform the same tasks, but it is still crucial to assess their effectiveness in these applications and compare them to biochar. This is owing to the possibility that the physicochemical properties of biochar and hydrochar are substantially different [38]. The hydrochar method is also environmentally friendly, because unlike dry pyrolysis, it produces no toxic chemical waste or byproducts [39].
Hydrochar is currently recognized as the next developing sustainable carbonaceous adsorbent which may be produced by HTC for any type of feedstock, replacing the conventional activated carbon that was previously used. With little aromatization, low ash content, and high-carbon content, HTC-produced hydrochar has a high OFG level. However, the HTC method resulted in hydrochar with a low porosity and a lower surface area due to pore blockages predominantly caused by the condensation of hydrocarbon on the hydrochar's surface. This drawback requires that hydrochar be modified or activated [40].
HTC allows for the direct conversion of agricultural and forestry waste biomass into hydrochar, a carbon-rich substance, under benign reaction conditions. Hydrochar's surface is packed with functional group that contains O. As a result, hydrochar can be employed as an efficient adsorbent to extract organic dyes from wastewater; however, due to the lack of phenolic and carboxyl groups and a constrained specific surface area, its adsorbing effectiveness is constrained. Surface modification can boost hydrochar's adsorption capability and number of active surface groups [41].
3 Hydrochar production
Hydrochar can be synthesized by adopting the following techniques.
3.1 Hydrothermal carbonization
HTC is a wet thermochemical process that ensures that water stays in the liquid state for a few minutes to many hours while being exposed to little or no oxygen. It takes place at elevated temperatures ranging from 180 °C to 300 °C under autogenous pressures above saturated pressures [42]. The reaction pressure is often autogenic, with the reaction temperature being matched by the saturation vapor pressure of water. The cleavage and hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass can be facilitated at elevated temperatures by water with a high ionization constant. Organic materials are hydrolyzed by water, which is further accelerated by acids or bases [37]. This method is advantageous for reducing the ash content too [43]. Waste may be processed via the hydrothermal carbonization procedure, which employs pressure and heat in the presence of water [44]. The utilization of wet feedstock with greater than 50% moisture content distinguishes HTC and eliminates the requirement for energy-intensive drying before or during the procedure [45]. An environmentally friendly technology is the HTC process. It uses heat to turn a wide range of biomass feedstocks into smokeless, high-carbon solid fuels [46]. The requirement of pure deionized water for experiments is one of the main limitations of hydrothermal processes [47]. By applying higher temperatures between 180 and 250 °C at elevated pressure ranging from 2 to 10 MPa for several hours, HTC of biomass and water are studied. Bergius and Specht were the first to introduce the HTC process. They made high-carbon material out of cellulosic material. In a sealed vessel, the cellulose and water mixture was heated to 250–310 °C. The solid with a lower O/C ratio was produced as a result, indicating that HTC was a successful conversion process [46]. Alkali metal concentration in biochar can be decreased using HTC regardless of pre-drying [48].
The aqueous medium's subcritical conditions are significant. It permits water to remain liquid beyond 100 °C and raises the viscosity coefficient when water's viscosity falls. Additionally, several substances become more soluble than they would normally be, including aldehydes, alcohols, and cellulose. The HTC method is made more favorable by these factors [49].
Water properties can be altered beyond the critical point without causing a phase shift. Water functions as both catalyst and reactant at the critical point. From 25 to 300 °C, the Kw of water increases, facilitating aromatic heterolytic cleavage and acid–base reactions. Water's dielectric constant decreases as the number of ordered hydrogen bonds decreases. Thus, water is a good solvent for solvating organic molecules, which improves hydrolysis, elimination, and nucleophilic substitution, and leads to high reaction rates in a single phase. High diffusion coefficients and mass transfer are anticipated, since viscosity reduces as temperature rises [50].
One of the most promising technologies is hydrothermal processing, because it can make use of the high moisture content of biomass. The high moisture content must be removed for other processing methods like combustion and pyrolysis, requiring significant energy for drying processes. In contrast, the thermochemical method of hydrothermal conversion of biomass into synthetic solid, liquid, or gaseous fuels and chemicals in hot-compressed water is energy-efficient, scalable, and viable [51]. As a result, it produced process water—a liquid end product, a little quantity of gaseous product, and hydrochar, a solid product with increased energy density. The HTC conditions like type of feedstock, time, and temperature largely determined the degree of conversion. The hydrochar that was created had better energy density, drying performance, and dewaterabilty [52].
The treated solid residue from several experiments that used the hydrothermal process as a pretreat technique was used for further degradation. Since hydrochar is produced from organic biomass waste, one of its most common properties is the enrichment and recovery of carbon [53].
There are two ways for hydrochar formation: Through solid–solid conversion, which preserves the structural components and morphology of the original biomass, or through aqueous phase degradation of biomass followed by polymerization of organic molecules into a solid phase [54]. Breakdown of hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin is brought on by these circumstances. The mixture is then restored into a solid substance. There are various steps to the mechanics of the hydrothermal conditioning process. First, the extractive material, hemicellulose, and cellulose are hydrolyzed. Aromatization, polymerization, condensation, decarboxylation, and dehydration come next [55].
At extremely low temperatures (180 to 250 °C), the HTC process uses dehydration and decarboxylation to minimize the amount of oxygen and hydrogen in the feedstock. Hydrothermal parameters that govern this process, such as residence temperature and time, dictate the degree of coalification of the raw biomass and the intensity of the reaction [17].
Recently, HTC has been considered a different technique for transforming biomass into products with additional value [38]. This technique uses lower temperatures and lighter reactional conditions than other thermal conversion processes to produce a variety of products from diverse types of biomass and has been demonstrating its versatility [56]. HTC can use a variety of feedstocks as precursors, including simple natural biomass like shrub wood, bamboo, fecal sludge, and sweet potato waste as well as pure model components like cellulose, starch, sucrose and glucose [57]. Other types of biomass, such as spent coffee grounds, banana leaves, oil palm biomass, marine plastic debris, sawdust, food waste, cotton and viscose fibers, olive pomace, and algae, can be pretreated with hydrothermal carbonization in addition to sludge [55].
The biomass conversion is accomplished through a series of intricate reactions that are influenced by the water's physical properties. These properties are typically manipulated by varying the time, pressure, and temperature of the biomass and water to produce the desired products. HTC is able to produce liquid products containing inorganic and organic value-added chemicals as well as solid hydrochar, which has superior physicochemical properties to raw biomass feedstocks. When compared to dry torrefaction, HTC hydrochars have lower O/C and H/C ratios and produce more materials of the lignin or coal variety [51].
A significant amount of hydrothermal wastewater (HW), which has a diverse composition and chemical oxygen requirement of up to 10.1–31.1 g/L, is nevertheless produced by the HTC biomass process. To prepare biomass slurry as an HTC feedstock, several researchers have processed HW using it as the water supply. However, the HW's organic content would influence how the HTC reacted and how the char product behaved [58].
When compared to pyrolysis, the HTC is known to offer a number of advantages, including lower emission levels and energy consumption. After drying, feedstocks with high moisture content produce little solid material, making them insufficient sources for pyrolysis. Since HTC does not require the feedstock to be dried, it is possible to process a wider range of feedstocks into hydrochar [38].
The fact that the HTC technique does not require any prior drying or treatment is one of its main advantages. In fact, the existence of moisture is advantageous, since it fully eliminates the need for an energy-intensive drying procedure including an expensive phase change. This process uses less energy than other methods like gasification and pyrolysis, which provide equivalent final products. While leaving behind the more stable carbon particles, HTC enables the biomass structure to emit volatile oxygen-rich molecules, primarily CO2 [42]. HTC produces more char and consumes less energy than pyrolysis is another advantage. This is in part because HTC operates at lower temperatures than pyrolysis and does not require the feedstock to be dried [38].
Co-hydrothermal carbonization (co-HTC) is a potential thermochemical conversion process that can overcome the limitations of hydrothermal carbonization with a single feedstock. The process of making hydrochar can address the issues of environmental pollution and energy crisis. Co-hydrochar's combustion, and chemical and physical characteristics are influenced by the method of manufacture, the conditions of the process, and the choice of raw materials. Co-hydrochar typically has a > higher heating value (HHV) and a lower H/C and O/C atomic ratio, which enhances combustion efficiency [59].
Hydrochar production by HTC is depicted in Fig. 1.
3.2 Hydrothermal liquefaction
The method of hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) uses water to dissolve or breakdown the biomass's macromolecules at elevated pressure and standard temperatures [60]. In the thermochemical process known as HTL, biomass is processed at temperatures between 200 and 374 °C while being subjected to high pressures between 5 and 20 MPa. The retention of considerable pressure keeps water as a liquid, because it vaporizes over 100 °C; this situation is referred to as subcritical [61]. HTL is especially suitable for moist feedstocks as the demand for drying is reduced because of the need of a wet reaction environment [62]. Likewise, the HTL process also generates a solid hydrochar, an aqueous phase, and a gas phase. It is crucial to characterize all of these additional products to identify an appropriate marketplace for them as to increase the economic viability of the HTL [63].
Under such conditions, sub-critical water maintains its liquid state and has unique properties like a lower dielectric constant. This property causes water to behave weakly polar and to be more soluble in organic molecules originating from biomass. HTL breaks down extremely reactive molecules, which then swiftly repolymerize to produce greasy compounds. Its liquid form is referred to as bio-oil. In contrast to other hydrothermal processes, HTL uses water as the catalyst and reaction media. HTL is therefore an ideal technique for biomass with high moisture content [60].
Hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater (HTLWW) is a byproduct of the HTL process in which 60–80% of the nutrients and 20–40% of the organic matter from the biomass are transported into the aqueous phase. HTLWW has a complex makeup that includes a variety of polymers, hazardous organics, such as a wide range of nitrogenous heterocyclic compounds, saccharides, benzene, phenols, and alcohols depending on the reaction circumstances [64].
Recent times have seen the emergence of fast HTL technology, which typically operates with an exceptionally high heating rate within a limited amount of time, i.e., 1–20 min. However, the majority of HTL operations were carried out in a micro-reactor without agitation. Alternately, most recent researches employed a novel self-designed external rotating system to guarantee an ample mixture throughout the rapid HTL process [65].
It is widely known that the yield and properties of the compounds greatly depend on the presence of a catalyst affixed in HTL process. For instance, homogeneous catalysts, such as sodium carbonate, were widely used in the catalytic HTL method, because they were more affordable, widely available, and coke-free than heterogeneous catalysts [65].
Pyrolysis and HTL, two different thermochemical processes that generate bio-oil and biochar, are controlled by the reaction temperature. The generation of bio-crude and its composition in HTL of biomass are influenced by the reaction conditions, because the ionic content of water varies according to the temperature of the reactor, which speeds up various reactions [66].
In the research, little is known about the mechanisms of hydrothermal liquefaction. The three main phases in the HTL process are depolymerization, decomposition, and recombination. In short, biomass is broken down and depolymerized into smaller molecules. These substances might be quite reactive, thus polymerizing and producing bio-based solid, gas, and crude substances [67]. It also releases a minimal amount of gas and C/N/P piled up aqueous phase byproducts in addition to bio-crude [68]. Additionally, significant process variables, including breakup of the components, condensation, repolymerization process, retention time, and temperature, from various steps might change correspondingly. Because biomass is a strange combination of lipids, proteins, lignin, and carbohydrates, the mechanism and reaction chemistry of biomass liquefaction are likewise intricate [67].
To produce biochar, bio-oil, and gaseous materials, biomass is subjected to depolymerization reactions, such as repolymerization, aromatization, deoxygenation, dehydration, hydrolysis, and fragmentation under these conditions. The kind of biomass and HTL operating conditions affect the final products' yield [61]. According to the temperature regime, two competitive reactions like hydrolysis and repolymerization have different dominances over one another. For example, at low reaction temperatures, hydrolysis predominates repolymerization, whereas at high temperatures, repolymerization tends to take over or compete directly with hydrolysis [66].
In the water-driven depolymerization procedure known as HTL, pressurized hot water is employed as a catalyst and reactant. This process converts the biopolymeric structure into byproducts like solid, liquid, and gas phases in a confined, oxygen-free environment. When compared to fast pyrolysis oil, HTL crude bio-oil is often more stable, has lower oxygen and moisture levels, and has a better calorific value and energy density. Carbon dioxide makes up more than 80% of HTL's gaseous products, with smaller amounts of styrene (C8H8), toluene (C7H8), benzene (C6H6), ethylene (C2H4), ethane (C2H6), methane (CH4), hydrogen (H2), and carbon monoxide also present (CO) [69].
Moreover, char produced by HTL has demonstrated significant possibilities for use in heterogeneous catalysts and a variety of industrial uses including nutraceuticals, food, cosmetics, organic fertilizer, livestock feed, pigment, and chemicals. HTL can be used as an economically sound substitute for the traditional thermochemical conversion of biomass to produce liquid biofuels from feedstocks with high water amount of water. HTL has several merits over other thermochemical conversion techniques, but its main benefit is that it skips the costly and time-consuming pre-drying stage [70].
The thermochemical transformation process known as hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae is a potential technique for the generation of bio-crude oil. Excellent energy efficiency along with reduced processing energy costs as a result of eliminating wet biomass drying stages are two advantages of this technique. When algal biofuels are produced via the HTL method, an adequate amount of remnants are also produced as byproducts, which are referred to as hydro or biochar. The total economics of producing algal biofuel will improve with the proper use of the hydrochar produced by the HTL process [71].
To enhance the process efficacy and reaction conditions, recent research has concentrated on employing co-solvents or reactive organic solvents in place of water in the HTL process. Due to its weaker polarity, organic solvents like ethanol have substantially lower critical pressures and temperatures than water [71].
HTL process is detailed in Fig. 2.
3.3 Hydrothermal gasification
A favorable thermochemical technique called hydrothermal gasification uses pressurized hot water to break down carbon-rich biomass into its primary byproducts, which include trace amount of higher hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and hydrogen (H2). The generated gas may be utilized as a source of heat or treated more to yield hydrogen-rich gas products. Lesser quantities of hydrochar were produced as a result of the higher rate of biomass disintegration under supercritical water conditions [28]. Because of its ability to use wet biomass and a comparatively low-temperature hydrothermal gasification is the most promising, since it exhibits energy and cost-efficiency. Both subcritical and supercritical water gasification occur during hydrothermal processes. At supercritical circumstances, water takes on the characteristics of a non-polar solvent, dispersing the biomass particles to overcome the problems caused by inefficient mass and heat transfer as well as viscosity. Additionally, hydrothermal gasification exhibits liquid-like density and gas like viscosity of supercritical water, which results in greater solubility and effective transformation of biomass into gases [72].
3.4 Microwave-assisted hydrothermal carbonization
In microwave pyrolysis method, biomass is thermally broken down into its components in a low-oxygen, inert environment. Electromagnetic radiation having a frequency between 300 MHz and 300 GHz and a wavelength between 1 and 1 mm is known as microwave radiation [73]. Due to the resistance between molecules that emerges from the association with electromagnetic field, microwave heating is typically mentioned to as dielectric heating. Therefore, the ability of the material to be scorched by microwave relies on both its capacity to absorb and retain energy as well as its ability to radiate this energy as heat. Substances with strong interactions with microwave due to their dielectric characteristics are referred to as absorbers. The more polar and mobile the components of biomass are, the better they will absorb microwave [74].
In contrast to conventional heating systems, microwave-assisted heating systems have gained popularity recently because of their benefits and characteristics. Conventional heating seems to have a number of drawbacks, including heat dissipation, long retention time, and lower yield from unwanted side reactions. Microwave heating results in a higher molecular heating level and can also raise the ambient temperature uniformly. As a result, microwave heating does have an increased processing rate, resulting in a shorter retention time with less energy use. Additionally, compared to traditional heating, the high heating value and calorific value of hydrochar produced by microwave heating is larger [75]. Microwave heating permits quicker and more homogeneous heat transfer via dipole rotation and ionic conduction with a lower energy loss than traditional heating by means of convection and conduction, which considerably shortens the time of reactions and extractions without sacrificing the simplicity of control [76].
In contrast to the traditional hydrothermal technique, microwave irradiation provides both uniform and rapid heating procedure that can drastically save time, cost, and maximize hydrochar yield [77].
The ability of microwave irradiation to heat molecules at the molecular level, results in uniform and rapid thermal reactions, has recently caught the interest of chemists. To ensure complete purity of the char, the thermal conversion of the biomaterial needs to be heated uniformly. To lower production costs, the heating procedure should also be quick. The biomaterials may be heated quickly and uniformly across the bulk using microwave heating [78]. Internal and external surfaces of the reaction vessel can both be heated by microwaves at the same time [79]. Additionally, the carbon could be recycled and used repeatedly thanks to microwave technology. This method does not harm the carbon; instead, it increases the surface area, which makes it easier for contaminants to adhere and improves the value. The fundamental contrast between conventional heating systems and microwave devices is how heat is produced. In the first method, the carbon bed is heated by convection or conduction, while the heating element is located outside the vertical furnace or rotary kiln where thermal regeneration is typically carried out [78].
Recent times have seen the application of microwave heating in association with the HTC method to treat diverse biomass, including cow dung, algal biomass, and lignocellulose [80]. HTC in a microwave technique was optimized for the generation of hydrochar from waste seaweed. Utilizing microwave technology to create hydrochar from discarded seaweed may be an energy-efficient way to create hydrochar that meets the same standards as hydrochar created using more traditional heating techniques [81].
Hydrochar production using microwave-assisted technique is depicted in Fig. 3.
4 Reaction mechanism of hydrochar
HTC reaction's first stage is hydrolysis, which involves the reaction of water with cellulose, hemicellulose, or extractives to break ether bonds primarily β-(1–4) glycosidic bonds and ester. As a result, a variety of products are developed, such as soluble oligomers like oligo-saccharides from hemicellulose and cellulose. While cellulose hydrolysis begins at temperatures above 230 °C, hemicellulose begins to hydrolyze at HTC temperatures above 180 °C. It is possible for cellulose to break down into oligomers, which can hydrolyze into fructose and glucose. In hydrothermal media, other elements such as extractives—monomeric sugars mostly fructose and glucose as well as different phenolic glycosides, oligomeric sugars, aliphatic acids, and alditols are highly reactive. At 260 °C, a very minor amount of lignin reacts and produces phenol and its derivatives. At temperatures between 200 and 260 degrees Celsius, inorganic components are relatively stable and will likely not change; hence, the breakdown of polymeric components could cause inorganics to leak out of the solid mass and into the solution [82].
Hemicellulose breaks down during HTC, resulting in high-molecular-weight oligo-saccharides, pentoses (compounds with five ring members), such as hexoses and xylose (compounds with six ring members), such as fructose and glucose. Hexoses are also produced when cellulose decomposes. Through dehydration, intramolecular cyclization, recombination, C–C-bond cleavage, and ring-opening monosaccharides become hydroxy methyl furfural (HMF) and furfural, which are reactive intermediates. Retro-aldol condensation reactions lead to the formation of ketones. Closed-chain compounds are directly dehydrated to produce acids. Hydrochar microstructures are created when furfural and HMF are polymerized. Through solid–solid conversion, insoluble lignin, a fraction of cellulose and hemicellulose that has not been hydrolyzed, forms the hydrochar network [19].
5 Role of water in HTC
For ions to move from one bond to another, water is both a necessary solvent and an effective transition media. Moreover, it randomly connects and disconnects the weak chemical bonds from one substance to another. Water is an essential component of the HTC process, because it reacts with the biomass structure to change its structure. Additionally, water behaves differently under subcritical conditions compared to water under ambient conditions. Organic chemicals are easily miscible with water at a subcritical environment. Due to the polymeric and rigid nature of lignocellulosic materials, there is a greater propensity for the breakdown of lower molecular weight organic compounds, including COOH and OH bonds, which eventually cause these compounds to become miscible with water [83]. Due to its low cost, safety, and inherent presence in wet biomass, water is used as a reactive medium in the HTC process. Water can also be used in place of hazardous solvents and reactive substances [84].
The liquid mixture used in the HTC process is referred to as volatile liquids. The ionization constant is another distinctive feature of subcritical water. The high range of the ionization constant indicates that there are many H+ and OH− ions present under subcritical conditions. In this circumstance, the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials can be accelerated by an in-situ acid- or base-catalyzed reaction [83].
6 Process parameters/ variables
Various process variables influencing the formation of hydrochar is depicted in Fig. 4.
6.1 Temperature
The HTC process relies greatly on temperature, since it supplies energy needed to heat and break down the biomass particles. The efficiency of biomass conversion grows with temperature because of the rise in energy supply by temperature [42].
Temperature is a key factor in the HTC process, since it directly influences the water characteristics that lead to ionic interactions in the subcritical zone. Above the critical point, the reaction mechanism in the supercritical water area changes from ionic to free-radical processes. Anyhow, a rise in temperatures alters the viscosity of the water in HTC processes where ions are the dominant factor, making it easier to permeate porous media and accelerating the decomposition of biomass. Additionally, when the temperature exceeds the activation energy, bond breakage in biomass macromolecular organics begins [17]. Condensation, decarboxylation and dehydration occur when the temperature crosses the activation energy. The process resembles pyrolysis when temperatures are too low. While less oil and gas are produced at higher temperatures, solid hydrochar yields are primarily increased. The link between temperature and the H/C and O/C ratios of biomass degradation is well shown in the Van Krevelen diagram [33].
Temperature below 250 °C is ideal for the production of char, moderate temperatures until 375 °C is preferred for the production of oil and temperatures beyond 375 °C mostly produce gas. Furthermore, gasification can occur at temperatures higher than 375 °C. Temperature is another factor that affects the quantity of biomass compounds that can be hydrolyzed. At 180 °C, hemicellulose completely hydrolyzes, while cellulose does so at roughly 220 °C. In contrast to the monomers reaction that takes place during the homogeneous reaction when the temperature is inadequate to split apart the biomass’s basic constituents, pyrolysis-like processes are more likely to happen at lower temperatures. Contrary to solid–solid conversion, using high temperatures with enough time duration may result in large degree of subsequent conversion and intermediate dissolution by polymerization, generating secondary char, which predominates the process of hydrochar generation [42].
6.2 Residence or retention time
Biomass conversion via hydrothermal processes is comparatively a sluggish process [85]. HTC residency period might last anywhere between a few minutes and a few days. However, reaction time only influences the hydrolysis processes to a certain time window, after which it has no discernible effect on the process. In general, it is noted that larger amounts of solid product are produced during longer reaction times. Both the product composition and the total amount of biomass converted are determined by reaction duration. The rate of biomass decomposition and hydrolysis are both relatively quick in supercritical circumstances [46].
The residence duration of the hydrothermal reaction is one of the crucial factors in the formation of carbon-rich materials. Residence time affects the recovery of solid products, but on comparison with temperature, its impact is much less. The amount of solid hydrochar produced depends directly on residence time. Large amounts of solid hydrochar are produced when the retention period is short, while limited portion are created when the retention time is lengthy [83].
6.3 Pressure
Another factor in the breakdown of biomass is pressure. Pressure preserves single-phase media for liquefactions that are both sub- and supercritical. This single-phase liquefaction is crucial to avoid the large enthalpy inputs required for the phase transition of solvents. Two-phase systems need a lot of heat to keep the system at the right temperature, which led to the invention of supplementary hydrochar using polyaromatic structures. Maintaining pressure beyond the critical pressure of the media will control the amount of hydrolysis and biomass dissolution, which might also enhance favorable reaction pathways thermodynamically for the production of liquid fuels or gas. Additionally, pressure raises solvent density. Molecular components of biomass are effectively penetrated by high-density medium, which enhances extraction and decomposition [86].
Isotropically, the pressure inside the reactor rises as the temperature does. Internal gravitational forces and natural convection forces that take place during heating are the two main factors that affect how materials are distributed within the reactor. The pressure within the reactor can be raised by enhancing the temperature or by introducing nitrogen. The Le Chatelier concept is applied inside the reactor. Thus, to retain the equilibrium at mounting pressure, the reaction equilibrium switches among the solid and liquid phases, which have less moles. This can be confirmed, since at increasing reaction pressures, condensation and polymerization reactions are claimed to rise concurrently with a reduction of dehydration and decarboxylation processes. The method generates gases, which are compressed and disintegrated into water to offer a wider access to the fluid stage. Rise in pressure also makes it easier for hydrogen ions to exchange [42].
6.4 pH
According to some studies, the pH level has fallen as a result of generation of organic acid in HTC process. To catalyze the breakdown of bio-macromolecules and the production of hydrochar during the hydrothermal reaction, organic acids play a vital transitional role. As a result, pH changes during the HTC process have an impact on the characteristics of hydrochar. During the hydrothermal process, it is commonly considered that the generation of organic acids from the biomass, such as formic acid, levulinic acid, and lactic acid, is auto-catalytic, and causes a pH reduction. The hydrothermal reaction process can be accelerated or changed to produce the desired hydrochars by adding acid or alkali as a catalyst. This causes a surge in protons or hydroxide-ions and a high ionic strength [83].
6.5 Feedstock–water ratio
The ratio of feedstock to water in the HTC process is yet another critical element. While a reduced water content during HTC could lead to an uneven distribution of temperature within the reactor, a higher water level during HTC favors biomass breakdown, comparable to the hydrolysis reaction. Additionally, water content and feedstock loading affect the hydrochar's quality. Biomass can be treated with HTC to create energy-dense hydrochar, which can then be pelletized to create fuel pellets. The fuel pellets can be utilized in coal power plants or for home heating [87].
7 Hydrochar composition
With only trace amounts of S and N2, hydrochar is mostly composed of C° and O2. The rate of deoxygenation, condensation, and aromatization increased at extreme temperatures, while the amount of N2 and S content of the hydrochar was barely altered. It showed that the atomic ratios of H/C and O/C in hydrochars were less compared to those found in the feed due to reactions caused by the production of water and carbon dioxide during HTC. The H/C and O/C atomic ratios of hydrochar often declined with temperature. Low H/C and O/C atomic ratio fuels have the benefits of less energy losses, water vapor, and smoke [88].
8 Hydrochar activation methods
Modification of hydrochar can be done, as shown in Fig. 5
8.1 Physical activation
Using a variety of the gas flow type, air, steam, and carbon dioxide or a mixture of the above with further gas varieties like nitrogen or carbon monoxide, physical activation is a high-temperature process that lasts for several hours under a gas flow. Microwave heating could be used to help in the heating process [89].
8.2 Chemical activation
The process of chemically activating biomass or char involves impregnating the material with a chemical activator, charring it for 1–24 h in the absence of O2 at temperature ranging between 500 and 800 °C, and then washing the calcined material in H2O and HCl to eliminate the activator. Various chemical agents, including potassium hydroxide, zinc chloride, orthophosphoric acid, potassium carbonate, sodium hydroxide, ferric chloride, sodium carbonate, and sulphuric acid, have been investigated in papers. The intercalation of ions into the carbon matrix, aromatization, and dehydration are some of the primary processes that are expected to happen during chemical activation. It must be mentioned that hazardous reagents are frequently used in considerable quantities during chemical activation. On contrast with physical activation, chemical activation offers many advantages, including lower operating temperatures, but there are also significant drawbacks, including the need for additional washing [89].
9 Functionalization of hydrochar
One of the simplest methods for altering the features of hydrochar is through hydrochar functionalization, which involves exposing its organic surface to particular functional groups. Adding acid groups like –COOH or SO3OH to hydrochar is a typical modification technique that makes it suitable as a solid acid catalyst for the production of biofuel or cellulose hydrolysis. This approach involves joining acid groups with carbon atoms on the amorphous carbon layer of the hydrochar formed to produce carboxyl, hydroxyl, or phenolic groups on the surface of the solid acidic catalysts [28]. Existence of hydrochar’s surface functionalities can be utilized to make it easier to add catalytic species to the carbon-based solid [90].
10 Hydrochar vs biochar
The method of producing hydrochar from biomass is called hydrothermal carbonization. Rather than drying conditions, hot-compressed water is used in this procedure to treat the biomass. The HTC technique provides a number of benefits over the conventional dry-thermal pre-treatments that produced the biochar. Both procedures produce char, but the physio-chemical characteristics of the char differ noticeably, and these differences have an impact on the char's ability to be used for common tasks including removing wastewater contaminants, enhancing soil, and producing bioenergy. The HTC processes' reaction mechanisms demonstrated how valuable hydrochar is and how it outperforms biochar. This is due to the lower alkali metals and alkaline earth concentration that it has [8].
11 Hydrochar applications in various fields
11.1 Heavy metal adsorption
Any metal with an atomic weight between 63.5 and 200.6 with a specific gravity greater than 5.0 is referred to as a heavy metal [91]. The environmental issue is due to the existence of inorganic metal in the environment as a result of industrial processes like Cr and Ni coating, etc. These pollute the groundwater as well as the earth's aqueous system. The hazardous metals include Ni, Mn, Zn, Hg, Cd, Pb, Cu, and Cr. These metals have an adverse effect on humans and can lead to poisoning. Heavy metals are found in a variety of forms both in aqueous and food system [92].
Heavy metals have been produced as a result of many human environmental activities, and because they cannot degrade, they have accumulated in the environment. The standard concentration limit for Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, and Cu in water is 0.05, 0.5, 0.2, 0.02, and 2 mg/L, respectively, as determined by the World Health Organization (WHO) [7]. Heavy metal elimination is also important for overall health, because they are carcinogenic, teratogenic and lead to negative medical issues [93]. In comparison to dyes, heavy metal ions are more hazardous, non-degradable, and have good solubility and mobility in aqueous effluents. Furthermore, even at extremely low concentrations, heavy metal ions are very hazardous [94].
Chromium is a metal that can be hazardous and cancer-causing that results from human activities [95]. Lead is frequently found in wastewaters let out from smelting, mining, pesticides, and paint industries [96].
The impact of H2O2 addition on hydrothermally generated biochar (hydrochar) from peanut shell for eliminating aqueous heavy metals was investigated by Yingwen Xue and co-workers. Characterization tests revealed that the hydrochar surfaces had more oxygen-containing functional groups, notably carboxyl groups, after H2O2 alteration. The altered hydrochar therefore demonstrated improved lead sorption capability, with a sorption rate of 22.82 mg/g [97].
To examine the responses of zinc and cadmium, Sedum alfredii was hydrothermally converted at temperatures between 210 and 300 °C using various solvents such as HCl and water, and the properties and prospective uses of the resulting hydrochars were investigated. The removal of zinc and cadmium from the solid phase was aided by the incorporation of HCl and low temperature. At 210 °C and with HCl present, the greatest removal efficiencies of zinc and cadmium were 89.3% and 95%, respectively [98].
Huijuan Song reported on an effective method for HTC of sunflower straw (Helianthus annuus L.) for getting rid of heavy metals. Examined was the impact of various HTC temperatures and HCl additive concentrations on the effectiveness of heavy metal removal. According to the findings, raising the HCl concentration or temperature during HTC facilitated the transfer of heavy metals from hydrochar to liquid products. After hydrothermal conversion at a temperature of 200 °C and 2% HCl, up to 87% of Pb, 94% of Cu, and 99% of Zn and Cd were removed to the liquid products. When the temperature was raised from 160 °C to 280 °C, the species of heavy metals in hydrochars changed from unstable to stable [99]. Table 1 denotes the rejection of heavy metal from aqueous solution by employing hydrochar from biomass as feedstock by employing HTC.
11.2 Dye adsorption
Due to their ability to produce color, synthetic dyes are indeed a prerequisite in many important industries, including textile, paper, and leather sectors. An estimated one hundred thousand commercially available dyes are used to produce seven hundred thousand tons of varied colors every year. Most dyes are frequently thrown into environmental water bodies after they have served their purpose. More than half of the dyestuffs which are currently found in the environment across the globe is from the textile sector, which discharges the most of them about 54%. Although the precise quantity of dyestuffs released into the environment by each company is unclear, but it can be estimated that the amount is sufficiently huge to pose a serious environmental concern [115].
Organic dyes are teratogenic, mutagenic, cancerous, and extremely poisonous and their spontaneous discharge inside the habitat can result in major environmental problems along with health risks for people and other living things. Therefore, it is vital to remove colors effectively and economically before discharging dye effluent. Because of its considerable OFG on the surface, high porosity structure, and well-developed surface area, hydrochar is acknowledged as an effective substitute for the elimination of organic dyes from wastewater [116].
Malachite green (MG) is used as a pollutant to assess the adsorption capability, while pine and peanut shell serve as base materials to make effective sorbents. Sorption tests were conducted with different operational parameters, such as contact duration, interfering ions, and pH. Results indicate that enhancing the surface hydroxyl functional groups of adsorbents by a single-step alteration with ethanol and NaOH is a successful chemical modification. Sorbents developed from HTC with chemical modifications have the best sorption efficiency; the qe of altered hydrochar made from pine and peanut shell is as high as 562.2 and 570.34 mg/g. Adsorption kinetics and isothermal studies show that the majority of the sorption activity takes place on the surface of sorbents, and that chemical adsorption is the dominating method for removing MG as a consequence of the augmentation of surface hydroxyl functional groups by chemical modification [117].
Hydrochar as sorbent for the elimination of dye from aqueous systems and their associated parameters are depicted in Table 2.
11.3 Emerging contaminants
Emerging contaminants (ECs) are substances that are present in the environment but whose presence and effects have only lately been detected. Engineered nanomaterial’s, industrial compound, such as metabolites and degradation products, food additives, veterinary products such as hormones, herbicides, and pharmaceuticals and personal care products, are just a few of the many contaminants that fall under the category of ECs [136]. The usage of pesticides has been recommended because to its high efficacy and quick results. These substances are becoming more and more common for managing and boosting crop yields to attain outstanding results [137].
One of the humanity's biggest scientific advances over the past century has been the development of antibiotics, which have transformed how bacterial infections are treated by either killing or limiting the growth of microbes and saved countless lives. However, in the last few years, a specific health concern has been the increase of antibiotic residues in water bodies [138].
Isothiazolinones have been utilized as antimicrobials in a variety of industries, including paint and sunscreens, cleansing products, household products, and cosmetics. These chemicals are widely used; however, disinfection preservatives may build up in living spaces or even in people, which can be hazardous to human health. Skin sensitization risks might arise from isothiazolinone at high dosages [139].
Studies have shown that these ECs are commonly and extensively present in effluents and surface water. Particularly, the use of hydrochars in the rejection of contaminants has caught the interest of many scientists because of their affordability and effectiveness [136].
One of the most popular methods used globally to remove water impurities is active carbon adsorption, which is very effective and has a straightforward operational design. However, the materials employed have a significant impact on the efficacy of its usage as a carbon source. Due to the growing need for activated carbons, hydrochars made from HTC of biomass resources, including as crop residues, can be transformed into excellent activated carbons, a higher value-added product, which can be used to clean polluted waters [140]. Activated hydrochars for eliminating ECs from aqueous solutions are portrayed in Table 3.
11.4 Electrochemical applications
Fortunately, studies have shown that hydrochar is a valuable material for electrochemical devices like batteries and supercapacitors. Batteries and supercapacitors both provide energy, with batteries offering a high energy density and supercapacitors a high power density [151]. For use as supercapacitor electrode materials, transition metal oxides, carbon materials, and electronically conducting polymers are being closely examined. Pseudocapacitance and electrical double layer capacitance are responsible for the majority of the capacitance in carbon materials and transition metal oxide electrodes, respectively. Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass and carbohydrates yields functional carbonaceous materials. Surface functional groups can be found in varying amounts in hydrothermal carbon [152]. As a result of its stability, aromaticity, porosity, polarity and smaller surface area, hydrochar has drawn interest for these applications [28]. Role of hydrochar for supercapacitor applications is shown in Table 4.
11.5 Soil amendments
Hydrochar application in the soil, however, could have a positive or negative impact on crop yield. The hydrochar's greater surface area and porosity increase soil activity by providing the soil organisms with adequate aeration, water, and minerals that guard against contagious diseases. Due to the lack of significant polar functionality on its surface, newly formed hydrochar generally exhibits a hydrophobic character. Moreover, over time, after being incorporated into the soil, the hydrochar oxidizes through interaction with atmospheric oxygen, becoming more hydrophilic and developing carboxylic and phenolic functional groups on its surface [28].
Global climate, ecosystem sustainability, and agricultural production are all seriously threatened by increased soil degradation. One of the most vital and practical methods to bring down greenhouse gas emissions, enhance carbon sequestration, boost crop productivity, and enhance soil quality is to add-on soil organic carbon. Current findings have shown that hydrochars can also be useful multipurpose soil additives. Hydrochar utilization for soil amendment is highly dependent on HTC conditions and feedstock [167]. The use of hydrochar as an organic growth medium for vegetable seedlings in gardening and horticulture, or as a soil amendment, is one of the potential uses for this material that is gaining interest. Using hydrochar in both situations, the potential for arable land to sequester carbon is increased and greenhouse gas emissions may be reduced [20].
Sandy soil's ability to retain water is improved with the addition of hydrochar. Applying hydrochar to the soil decreases its density and enhances the size of its pores, permitting the soil to hold more water. Hydrochar can be used as a fertilizer for soil; however, its physicochemical properties and resistance to microbial decay rely on HTC working conditions and precursor. The use of hydrochar as a soil supplement, however, has been shown in a number of studies to affect plant growth in both favorable and unfavorable ways, depending on the type of plant and soil [168].
11.6 Greenhouse gas emission
Biochar is a well-known resource for carbon sequestration for preventing climate change, since pyrolysis changes biomass into a more durable form. Similar uses may be made with hydrochar if it is found to be similarly recalcitrant. Researchers have examined at the fluxes of greenhouse gases in soil, including nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide, and methane. It has frequently been discovered that hydrochar is less powerful to biochar at reducing climate change, because it is less stable in soils. In contrast to unaltered soil, hydrochar was shown to reduce nitrous oxide emissions while increasing ammonia, carbon dioxide, and methane emissions from soil [38].
11.7 Carbon sequestration
The technique of sequestering and trapping carbon is known as carbon sequestration. Hydrochar particles are less likely to self-ignite because of their high surface oxygen content. To solve all of the problems caused by hydrochar's poor soil stability, extensive research in this field is required. Hydrochar is effective at removing carbon dioxide from the air, which lessens the impact of global warming [169].
12 Hydrochar benefits
Hydrochar offers various benefits including the presence of metals with reduced concentrations of alkaline and alkali earth metals and heavy metals, high capacity for adsorption of both polar and non-polar functional groups and reduced ash content. Additionally, hydrochar has lower carbon recovery and higher atomic O/C and H/C ratios when created at the same operational process temperature. Additionally, HTC's hydrochar is considered to be environmentally safe, and thus, unlike other char, it does not produce any harmful chemicals or byproducts [169].
13 Future scope
Although biomass could be effectively converted to hydrochar using the HTC method, the specific mechanisms by which hydrochar is formed are not completely understood and are limited to the degeneration of pure chemicals. Utilizing hydrochar will assist in lowering the amount of sludge and solid waste released into the environment, minimizing land pollution, and encouraging the circular economy by turning trash into a product with added value. The demand to increase waste into hydrochar conversion is also advantageous to the economy. The mechanisms of hydrochar production from complex biomass must therefore be clarified through additional study. Studying the utilization of green activating agents in the production of activated carbon is necessary. Perhaps, it is possible to conduct additional research to learn how to enhance these hydrochar properties to more effectively eliminate pollutants in water.
More extensive analysis on hydrochars generated using various individual or combined materials needs to be carried out to determine the links between the HTC conditions, their feedstocks, and physicochemical features of hydrochar. Furthermore, the methods of hydrochar production from various materials at varied HTC settings employing various ingredients must be explained.
Limitations like handling and disposal issues, commercial viability, renewability, and lack of regeneration must be resolved to create improved adsorbents. Discovering how to dispose of used chars through reactivation, burning, landfilling, and recycling is enlightening. The process's effectiveness will be ensured by the used adsorbents' capacity to be reused.
14 Conclusion
An effective method for creating hydrochar with a huge capacity for the synthesis of activated carbon is hydrothermal carbonization. It is discussed how variables like temperature, retention time, and pressure affect the characteristics of hydrochar while also being essential for achieving the required porosity in activated carbons. While numerous approaches have been created to stimulate hydrochar to enhance its physio-chemical characteristics, new syntheses and inventive manufacturing techniques are urgently needed to create designed carbon products with added value from hydrochar. Over time, it has been noted that hydrochar is extensively used in the treatment of wastewater. Due to its capacity for regeneration, high efficacy, surface area, and pore volume, hydrochar is projected to be a desirable alternative for the elimination of a range of contaminants. Hydrochar also finds its application in wide variety of fields like enhancing soil and crop productivity, supercapacitors, carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emission. Before using hydrochar and its derivatives in actual applications, it is important to investigate and analyze their ecotoxicity and environmental consequences, because they may have negative effects.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Abbreviations
- ECs:
-
Emerging contaminants
- HMF:
-
Hydroxy methyl furfural
- HTC:
-
Hydrothermal carbonization
- HTL:
-
Hydrothermal liquefaction
- HW:
-
Hydrothermal wastewater
- OFG:
-
Oxygen functional groups
- WHO:
-
World Health Organization
References
Varsha M, Senthil Kumar P, Senthil Rathi B (2022) A review on recent trends in the removal of emerging contaminants from aquatic environment using low-cost adsorbents. Chemosphere 287(3):132270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132270
Li B, Guo J, Lv K, Fan J (2019) Adsorption of methylene blue and Cd(II) onto maleylated modified hydrochar from water. Environ Pollut 254:113014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113014
Amina Othmani, Sara Magdouli, P. Senthil Kumar, Ashish Kapoor, Padmanaban Velayudhaperumal Chellam, Ömür Gökkuş (2022) Agricultural waste materials for adsorptive removal of phenols, chromium (VI) and cadmium (II) from wastewater: a review. Environ Res 204(A):111916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111916
Ighalo JO, Omoarukhe FO, Ojukwu VE, Iwuozor KO, Igwegbe CA (2022) Cost of adsorbent preparation and usage in wastewater treatment: A review. Clean Chem Eng 3:100042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clce.2022.100042
Chai WS, Cheun JY, Senthil Kumar P, Mubashir M, Majeed Z, Banat F, Ho S-H, Show PL (2021) A review on conventional and novel materials towards heavy metal adsorption in wastewater treatment application. J Clean Product 296:126589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126589
Adam MR, Othman MHD, Kurniawan TA, Puteh MH, Ismail AF, Khongnakorn W, Rahman MA, Jaafar J (2022) Advances in adsorptive membrane technology for water treatment and resource recovery applications: a critical review. J Environ Chem Eng 10(3):107633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.107633
Ighalo JO, Rangabhashiyam S, Dulta K, Umeh CT, Iwuozor KO, Aniagor CO, Eshiemogie SO, Iwuchukwu FU, Igwegbe CA (2022) Recent advances in hydrochar application for the adsorptive removal of wastewater pollutants. Chem Eng Res Des 184:419–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2022.06.028
Hesham A, Awad Y, Jahin H, El-Korashy S, Maher S, Kalil H, Khairy G (2021) Hydrochar for Industrial Wastewater Treatment: An Overview on its Advantages and Applications. Environ Analyt Toxicol 11:3
Medjili C, Lakhdari N, Lakhdari D, Berchi A, Osmani N, Laourari I, Vasseghian Y, Berkani M (2023) Synthesis of novel PANI/PVA-NiCu composite material for efficient removal of organic dyes. Chemosphere 313:137427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137427
Senthil Rathi B, Senthil Kumar P, Parthiban R (2022) A review on recent advances in electrodeionization for various environmental applications. Chemosphere 289:133223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133223
Kazak O, Tor A (2020) In situ preparation of magnetic hydrochar by co-hydrothermal treatment of waste vinasse with red mud and its adsorption property for Pb(II) in aqueous solution. J Hazardous Mater 393:122391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122391
Mäkelä M, Benavente V, Fullana A (2015) Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass: Effect of process conditions on hydrochar properties. Appl Energy 155:576–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.06.022
Cui X, Min Lu, Khan MB, Lai C, Yang X, He Z, Chen G, Yan B (2020) Hydrothermal carbonization of different wetland biomass wastes: Phosphorus reclamation and hydrochar production. Waste Manag 102:106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.034
Chen B, Guan H, Zhang Y, Liu S, Zhao B, Zhong C, Zhang H, Ding W, Song A, Zhu Di, Liu L, Wulan B, Li H, Liu G, Feng X (2023) Performance and mechanism of Pb2+ and Cd2+ ions’ adsorption via modified antibiotic residue-based hydrochar. Heliyon 9(4):e14930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14930
Nadarajah K, Bandala ER, Zhang Z, Mundree S, Goonetilleke A (2021) Removal of heavy metals from water using engineered hydrochar: Kinetics and mechanistic approach. J Water Process Eng 40:101929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.101929
Jamal-Uddin A-T, Salaudeen SA, Dutta A, Zytner RG (2022) Hydrothermal conversion of waste biomass from greenhouses into hydrochar for energy, soil amendment, and wastewater treatment applications. Energies 15(10):3663. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103663
Wang T, Zhai Y, Zhu Y, Li C, Zeng G (2018) A review of the hydrothermal carbonization of biomass waste for hydrochar formation: Process conditions, fundamentals, and physicochemical properties. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 90:223–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.071
Catenacci A, Boniardi G, Mainardis M, Gievers F, Farru G, Asunis F, Malpei F, Goi D, Cappai G, Canziani R (2022) Processes, applications and legislative framework for carbonized anaerobic digestate: Opportunities and bottlenecks. A critical review. Energy Convers Manag 263:115691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115691
Shyam S, Arun J, Gopinath KP, Ribhu G, Ashish M, Ajay S (2022) Biomass as source for hydrochar and biochar production to recover phosphates from wastewater: A review on challenges, commercialization, and future perspectives. Chemosphere 286:131490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131490
Puccini M, Ceccarini L, Antichi D, Seggiani M, Tavarini S, Latorre MH, Vitolo S (2018) Hydrothermal carbonization of municipal woody and herbaceous prunings: hydrochar valorisation as soil amendment and growth medium for horticulture. Sustainability 10(3):846. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030846
Pak S, Ahn J, Kim H (2022) Synthesis of saccharide-based hydrochar with macroporous structure for effective organic pollutant removal. Fibers Polymers 23(7):1789–1796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-022-4007-5
Rasheed T, Bilal M, Iqbal HMN (2022) Toxicological impact and adsorptive removal of triclosan from water bodies using chitosan and carbon-based nano-architectures. Nano-Biosorbents Decontam Water Air Soil Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90912-9.00019-8
Shafizadeh A, Shahbeik H, Rafiee S, Moradi A, Shahbaz M, Madadi M, Li C, Peng W, Tabatabaei M, Aghbashlo M (2023) Machine learning-based characterization of hydrochar from biomass: Implications for sustainable energy and material production. Fuel 347:128467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128467
Djandja OS, Duan P-G, Yin L-X, Wang Z-C, Duo J (2021) A novel machine learning-based approach for prediction of nitrogen content in hydrochar from hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge. Energy 232:121010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121010
Velusamy P, Srinivasan J, Subramanian N, Mahendran RK, Saleem MQ, Ahmad M, Shafiq M, Choi J-G (2023) Optimization-driven machine learning approach for the prediction of hydrochar properties from municipal solid waste. Sustainability 15(7):6088. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076088
Genli N, Kutluay S, Baytar O, Şahin Ö (2021) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from hydrochar by hydrothermal carbonization of chickpea stem: an application in methylene blue removal by RSM optimization. Int J Phytorem 24(1):88–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2021.1926911
Zhang Y, Zhang T (2022) Biowaste valorization to produce advance carbon material-hydrochar for potential application of Cr (VI) and Cd (II) adsorption in wastewater: a review. Water 14(22):3675. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14223675
Masoumi S, Borugadda VB, Nanda S, Dalai AK (2021) Hydrochar: a review on its production technologies and applications. Catalysts 11(8):939. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11080939
Zhang DX, Wang DY, Cai DJ, Wilson PK, Lee AF (2020) Bio/hydrochar sorbents for environmental remediation. Energy Environm Mater 3(4):453–468. https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.12074
Chatir EM, El Hadrami A, Ojala S, Brahmi R (2022) Production of activated carbon with tunable porosity and surface chemistry via chemical activation of hydrochar with phosphoric acid under oxidizing atmosphere. Surfaces Interfaces 30:101849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2022.101849
Zhang Z, Zhu Z, Shen B, Liu L (2019) Insights into biochar and hydrochar production and applications: a review. Energy 171:581–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.035
Siyu Xu, Chen J, Peng H, Leng S, Li H, Wenqi Qu, Yingchao Hu, Li H, Jiang S, Zhou W, Leng L (2021) Effect of biomass type and pyrolysis temperature on nitrogen in biochar, and the comparison with hydrochar. Fuel 291:120128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120128
Kambo HS, Dutta A (2015) A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 45:359–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.050
Hessien M (2022) Microwave-assisted hydrothermal carbonization of pomegranate peels into hydrochar for environmental applications. Energies 15(10):3629. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103629
Matheus Cavali, Nelson Libardi Junior, Julia Dutra de Sena, Adenise Lorenci Woiciechowski, Carlos Ricardo Soccol, Paulo Belli Filho, Rémy Bayard, Hassen Benbelkacem, Armando Borges de Castilhos Junior (2023) A review on hydrothermal carbonization of potential biomass wastes, characterization and environmental applications of hydrochar, and biorefinery perspectives of the process. Sci Total Environ 857(3):159627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159627
Ángel Fernández-Sanromán, Gabriela Lama, Marta Pazos, Emilio Rosales, Maria Ángeles Sanromán (2021) Bridging the gap to hydrochar production and its application into frameworks of bioenergy, environmental and biocatalysis areas. Biores Technol 320(B):124399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124399
Zhang S, Zhu X, Zhou H, Shang H, Luo J, Tsang DCW (2019) Hydrothermal carbonization for hydrochar production and its application. Biochar Biomass Waste. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811729-3.00015-7
June Fang Lu, Zhan YS, Ok BG (2018) Minireview of potential applications of hydrochar derived from hydrothermal carbonization of biomass. J Ind Eng Chem 57:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.08.026
Niazi NK, Murtaza B, Bibi I, Shahid M, White JC, Nawaz MF, Bashir S, Shakoor MB, Choppala G, Murtaza G, Wang H (2016) Removal and recovery of metals by biosorbents and biochars derived from biowastes. Environ Mater Waste. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803837-6.00007-X
Jais FM, Chee CY, Ismail Z, Ibrahim S (2021) Experimental design via NaOH activation process and statistical analysis for activated sugarcane bagasse hydrochar for removal of dye and antibiotic. J Environm Chem Eng 9(1):104829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104829
Lv B-W, Huan Xu, Guo J-Z, Bai L-Q, Li B (2022) Efficient adsorption of methylene blue on carboxylate-rich hydrochar prepared by one-step hydrothermal carbonization of bamboo and acrylic acid with ammonium persulphate. J Hazardous Mater 421:126741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126741
Leena Pauline A, Joseph K (2020) Hydrothermal carbonization of organic wastes to carbonaceous solid fuel – A review of mechanisms and process parameters. Fuel 279:118472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118472
Zhang B, Heidari M, Regmi B, Salaudeen S, Arku P, Thimmannagari M, Dutta A (2018) Hydrothermal carbonization of fruit wastes: a promising technique for generating hydrochar. Energies 11(8):2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11082022
Wilk M, Czerwińska K, Śliz M, Imbierowicz M (2023) Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge: Hydrochar properties and processing water treatment by distillation and wet oxidation. Energy Rep 9(5):39–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.03.092
Afolabi OOD, Sohail M, Cheng Y-L (2020) Optimisation and characterisation of hydrochar production from spent coffee grounds by hydrothermal carbonization. Renewable Energy 147(1):1380–1391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.098
Nizamuddin S, Baloch HA, Griffin GJ, Mubarak NM, Bhutto AW, Abro R, Mazari SA, Ali BS (2017) An overview of effect of process parameters on hydrothermal carbonization of biomass. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 73:1289–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.122
Harisankar S, Vishnu Mohan R, Vaishali Choudhary, Vinu R (2022) Effect of water quality on the yield and quality of the products from hydrothermal liquefaction and carbonization of rice straw. Biores Technol 351:127031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127031
Chen B, Zongrun Gu, Mingjiang Wu, Ma Z, Lim HR, Khoo KS, Show PL (2022) Advancement pathway of biochar resources from macroalgae biomass: a review. Biomass Bioenergy 167:106650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106650
Carrasco S, Pino-Cortés E, Barra-Marín A, Fierro-Gallegos A, León M (2022) Use of hydrochar produced by hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass for thermal power plants in chile: a techno-economic and environmental study. Sustainability 14(13):8041. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138041
Tasca AL, Puccini M, Gori R, Corsi I, Galletti AMR, Vitolo S (2019) Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge: A critical analysis of process severity, hydrochar properties and environmental implications. Waste Manag 93:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.027
Güleç F, Riesco LMG, Williams O, Kostas ET, Samson A, Lester E (2021) Hydrothermal conversion of different lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks – Effect of the process conditions on hydrochar structures. Fuel 302:121166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121166
Xiaoyuan Zheng, Zhengwei Jiang, Zhi Ying, Jiaxing Song, Wei Chen, Bo Wang (2020) Role of feedstock properties and hydrothermal carbonization conditions on fuel properties of sewage sludge-derived hydrochar using multiple linear regression technique. Fuel 271:117609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117609
Zhang Z, Yang J, Qian J, Zhao Y, Wang T, Zhai Y (2021) Biowaste hydrothermal carbonization for hydrochar valorization: Skeleton structure, conversion pathways and clean biofuel applications. Biores Technol 324:124686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124686
Lucian M, Volpe M, Gao L, Piro G, Goldfarb JL, Fiori L (2018) Impact of hydrothermal carbonization conditions on the formation of hydrochars and secondary chars from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Fuel 233:257–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.06.060
Czerwińska K, Śliz M, Wilk M (2022) Hydrothermal carbonization process: Fundamentals, main parameter characteristics and possible applications including an effective method of SARS-CoV-2 mitigation in sewage sludge. A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 154:111873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111873
Antero RVP, Alves ACF, Ferreira Sales PT, de Oliveira SB, Ojala SA, Brum SS (2019) A new approach to obtain mesoporous-activated carbon via hydrothermal carbonization of Brazilian Cerrado biomass combined with physical activation for bisphenol-A removal. Chem Eng Commun 206(11):1498–1514. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2019.1601625
Liu F, Ruidong Yu, Ji X, Guo M (2018) Hydrothermal carbonization of holocellulose into hydrochar: Structural, chemical characteristics, and combustion behavior. Biores Technol 263:508–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.019
Wang R, Lin Z, Peng P, Tan S, Zhao Z, Yin Q, Wang C (2022) Influence mechanism of aqueous organic components on the hydrochar formation reaction during the biomass hydrothermal carbonization wastewater recycling. Fuel 326:125033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125033
Wang Q, Shuang Wu, Cui Da, Zhou H, Dongyang Wu, Pan S, Faxing Xu, Wang Z (2022) Co-hydrothermal carbonization of organic solid wastes to hydrochar as potential fuel: A review. Sci Total Environ 850:158034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158034
Marulanda VA, Botero CD, Gutierrez CA, Alzate C (2019) Thermochemical, biological, biochemical, and hybrid conversion methods of bio-derived molecules into renewable fuels. Adv Bioprocess Alternat Fuels Biobased Chem Bioproducts. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817941-3.00004-8
Ponnusamy VK, Nagappan S, Bhosale RR, Lay C-H, Nguyen DD, Pugazhendhi A, Woong CS, Kuma G (2020) Review on sustainable production of biochar through hydrothermal liquefac-tion: Physico-chemical properties and applications. Biores Technol 310:123414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123414
Castello D, Pedersen TH, Rosendahl LA (2018) Continuous hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: a critical review. Energies 11(11):3165. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11113165
Cantero-Tubilla B, Cantero DA, Martinez CM, Tester JW, Walker LP, Posmanik R (2018) Characterization of the solid products from hydrothermal liquefaction of waste feedstocks from food and agricultural industries. J Supercrit Fluids 133(2):665–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.07.009
Usman M, Shi Z, Ren S, Ngo HH, Luo G, Zhang S (2020) Hydrochar promoted anaerobic digestion of hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater: Focusing on the organic degradation and microbial community. Chem Eng J 399:125766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125766
Liu Q, Zhang G, Liu M, Kong Ge, Ruolan Xu, Han L, Zhang X (2022) Fast hydrothermal liquefaction coupled with homogeneous catalysts to valorize livestock manure for enhanced biocrude oil and hydrochar production. Renew Energy 198:521–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.090
Brindhadevi K, Anto S, Rene ER, Sekar M, Mathimani T, Chie NTL, Pugazhendhi A (2021) Effect of reaction temperature on the conversion of algal biomass to bio-oil and biochar through pyrolysis and hydrothermal liquefaction. Fuel 285:119106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119106
Gollakota ARK, Kishore N, Sai Gu (2018) A review on hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81(1):1378–1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.178
Ni J, Qian L, Wang Y, Zhang Bo, Heng Gu, Yamin Hu, Wang Q (2022) A review on fast hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass. Fuel 327:125315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125135
Marrakchi F, Toor SS, Nielsen AH, Pedersen TH, Rosendahl LA (2023) Bio-crude oils production from wheat stem under subcritical water conditions and batch adsorption of post-hydrothermal liquefaction aqueous phase onto activated hydrochars. Chem Eng J 452(2):139293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.139293
Norouzi O, Mazhkoo S, Haddadi SA, Arjmand M, Dutta A (2022) Hydrothermal liquefaction of green macroalgae Cladophora glomerata: Effect of functional groups on the catalytic performance of graphene oxide/polyurethane composite. Catal Today 404:93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2022.01.021
Masoumi S, Boahene PE, Dalai AK (2021) Biocrude oil and hydrochar production and characterization obtained from hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae in methanol-water system. Energy 217:119344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119344
Sarker TR, Nanda S, Dalai AK (2022) Hydrogen-rich gas production from hydrothermal gasification of fuel pellets obtained from co-pelletization of agricultural residues. Int J Hydrogen Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.134
Manoj Tripathi JN, Sahu P, Ganesan TKD (2015) Effect of temperature on dielectric properties and penetration depth of oil palm shell (OPS) and OPS char synthesized by microwave pyrolysis of OPS. Fuel 153:257–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.02.118
Gaudino EC, Cravotto G, Manzoli M, Tabasso S (2019) from waste biomass to chemicals and energy via microwaveassisted processes. Green Chem 21:1202–1235. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8GC03908A
Zulkornain MF, Shamsuddin AH, Normanbhay S, Saad JM, Zhang YS, Samsuri S, Ghani WAWAK (2021) Microwave-assisted hydrothermal carbonization for solid biofuel application: a Brief Review. Carbon Capture Sci Technol 1:100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2021.100014
Cao L, Yu IKM, Cho D-W, Wang Di, Tsang DCW, Zhang S, Ding S, Wang L, Ok YS (2019) Microwave-assisted low-temperature hydrothermal treatment of red seaweed (Gracilaria lemaneiformis) for production of levulinic acid and algae hydrochar. Biores Technol 273:251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.013
Deng C, Kang X, Lin R, Murphy JD (2020) Microwave assisted low-temperature hydrothermal treatment of solid anaero-bic digestate for optimising hydrochar and energy recovery. Chem Eng J 395:124999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124999
Mubarak NM, Sahu JN, Abdullah EC, Jayakuamr NS (2016) Plam oil empty fruit bunch based magnetic biochar composite comparison for synthesis by microwave-assisted and conventional heating. J Anal Appl Pyrol 120:521–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2016.06.026
Junqing Xu, Zhang J, Huang J, He W, Li G (2020) Conversion of phoenix tree leaves into hydro-char by microwaveassisted hydrothermal carbonization. Biores Technol Rep 9:100353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100353
Wang J-X, Chen S-W, Lai F-Y, Liu S-y, Xiong J-b, Zhou C-F, Yi-Yua H-J (2020) Microwave-assisted hydrothermal carbonization of pig feces for the production of hydrochar. J Supercrit Fluids 162:104858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2020.104858
Soroush S, Ronsse F, Park J, Ghysels S, Di Wu, Kim K-W, Heynderickx PM (2023) Microwave assisted and conventional hydrothermal treatment of waste seaweed: Comparison of hydrochar properties and energy efficiency. Sci Total Environ 878:163193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163193
Toufiq Reza M, Andert J, Wirth B, Busch D, Pielert J, Lynam JG, Mumme J (2014) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass for energy and crop production. Appl Bioenergy 1:11–29. https://doi.org/10.2478/apbi-2014-0001
Khan TA, Saud AS, Jamari SS, Rahim MHA, Park J-W, Kim H-J (2019) Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass for carbon rich material preparation: a review. Biomass Bioenergy 130:105384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105384
Khan N, Sooraj Mohan P, Dinesha, (2021) Regimes of hydrochar yield from hydrothermal degradation of various lignocellulosic biomass: a review. J Clean Prod 288:125629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125629
Funke A, Ziegler F (2010) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: a summary and discussion of chemical mechanisms for process engineering. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 4:160–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.198
Akhtar J, Amin NAS (2011) A review on process conditions for optimum bio-oil yield in hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:1615–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.054
Gallant R, Farooque AA, He S, Kang K, Yulin Hu (2022) A mini-review: biowaste-derived fuel pellet by hydrothermal carbonization followed by pelletizing. Sustainability 14:12530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912530
Shen R, Jianwen Lu, Yao Z, Zhao L, Yulong Wu (2021) The hydrochar activation and biocrude upgrading from hydrothermal treatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Biores Technol 342:125914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125914
MacDermid-Watts K, Pradhan R, Dutta A (2020) Catalytic hydrothermal carbonization treatment of biomass for enhanced activated carbon: a review. Waste Biomass Valoriz 12:2171–2186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-01134-x
Quevedo-Amador RA, Reynel-Avila HE, Mendoza-Castillo DI, Badawi M, Bonilla-Petriciolet A (2022) Functionalized hydrochar-based catalysts for biodiesel production via oil transesterification: Optimum preparation conditions and performance assessment. Fuel 312:122731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122731
Raval NP, Shah PU, Shah NK (2016) Adsorptive removal of nickel(II) ions from aqueous environment: a review. J Environ Manage 179:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.045
Arora R (2019) Adsorption of heavy metals–a review. Mater Today Proc 18:4745–4750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.462
Saleh TA, Mustaqeem M, Khaled M (2022) Water treatment technologies in removing heavy metal ions from wastewater: A review. Environ Nanotechnol Monitor Manag 17:100617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2021.100617
Adel M, Ahmed MA, Elabiad MA, Mohamed AA (2022) Removal of heavy metals and dyes from wastewater using graphene oxide-based nanomaterials: a critical review. Environ Nanotechnol Monitor Manag 18:100719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2022.100719
Peng H, Guo J (2020) Removal of chromium from wastewater by membrane fltration, chemical precipitation, ion exchange, adsorption electrocoagulation, electrochemical reduction, electrodialysis, electrodeionization, photocatalysis and nanotechnology: a review. Environ Chem Lett 18:2055–2068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01058-x
Bayuo J, Rwiza M, Mtei K (2022) A comprehensive review on the decontamination of lead(II) from water and wastewater by low-cost biosorbents. RSC Adv 12:11233–11254. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA00796G
Xue Y, Gao B, Yao Y, Inyang M, Zhang M, Zimmerman AR, Ro KS (2012) Hydrogen peroxide modification enhances the ability of biochar (hydrochar) produced from hydrothermal carbonization of peanut hull to remove aqueous heavy metals: Batch and column tests. Chem Eng J 200–202:673–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.06.116
Zhang J, Wang Y, Wang X, Wenzhu Wu, Cui X, Cheng Z, Yan B, Yang X, He Z, Chen G (2022) Hydrothermal conversion of Cd/Zn hyperaccumulator (Sedum alfredii) for heavy metal separation and hydrochar production. J Hazardous Mater 423:127122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127122
Song H, Zhou J, He S, Ma Q, Peng L, Yin M, Lin H, Zeng Q (2023) Efficient removal of heavy metals from contaminated sunflower straw by an acid-assisted hydrothermal process. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20(2):1311. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021311
Deng J, Li X, Wei X, Liu Y, Liang J, Song B, Shao Y, Huang W (2020) Hybrid silicate-hydrochar composite for highly efficient removal of heavy metal and antibiotics: Coadsorption and mechanism. Chem Eng J 387:124097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124097
Sun K, Tang J, Gong Y, Zhang H (2015) Characterization of potassium hydroxide (KOH) modified hydrochars from different feedstocks for enhanced removal of heavy metals from water. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:16640–16651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4849-0
Dhaouadi F, Sellaoui L, Hernandez-Hernandez LE, Bonilla-Petriciolet A, Mendoza-Castillo DI, Reynel-Avila HE, Gonzalez-Ponce HA, Taamalli S, Louis F, Lamine AB (2021) Preparation of an avocado seed hydrochar and its application as heavy metal adsorbent: Properties and advanced statistical physics modeling. Chem Eng J 419:129472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129472
Khushk S, Zhang L, Pirzada AM, Irfan M, Li A (2019) Cr(VI) Heavy metal adsorption from aqueous solution by koh treated hydrochar derived from agricultural wastes. AIP Confer Proceed 2119:022003. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5115362
Madduri S, Elsayed I, Hassan EB (2020) Novel oxone treated hydrochar for the removal of Pb(II) and methylene blue (MB) dye from aqueous solutions. Chemosphere 260:127683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127683
Jiang Q, Xie W, Han S, Wang Y, Zhang Y (2019) Enhanced adsorption of Pb(II) onto modified hydrochar by polyethyleneimine or H3PO4: An analysis of surface property and interface mechanism. Colloids Surfaces A 583:123962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.123962
Xia Yu, Yang T, Zhu N, Li D, Chen Z, Lang Q, Liu Z, Jiao W (2019) Enhanced adsorption of Pb(II) onto modified hydrochar: modeling and mechanism analysis. Biores Technol 288:121593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121593
Shi Y, Zhang T, Ren H, Kruse A, Cui R (2018) Polyethylene imine modified hydrochar adsorption for chromium (VI) and nickel (II) removal from aqueous solution. Biores Tehnol 247:370–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.107
Li B, Lv J-Q, Guo J-Z, Shen-Yuan Fu, Guo M, Yang P (2019) The polyaminocarboxylated modified hydrochar for efficient capturing methylene blue and Cu(II) from water. Biores Technol 275:360–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.083
Zhang Y, Jianhua Qu, Yuan Y, Song H, Liu Y, Wang S, Tao Y, Zhao Y, Li Z (2022) Simultaneous scavenging of Cd(II) and Pb(II) from water by sulfide-modified magnetic pinecone-derived hydrochar. J Clean Product 341:130758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130758
He X, Zhang T, Xue Q, Zhou Y, Wang H, Boland NS, Jiang R, Tsang DCW (2021) Enhanced adsorption of Cu(II) and Zn(II) from aqueous solution by polyethyleneimine modified straw hydrochar. Sci Total Environ 778:146116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146116
Liu T, Chen Z, Li Z, Hao Fu, Chen G, Feng T, Chen Z (2021) Preparation of magnetic hydrochar derived from iron-rich Phytolacca acinosa Roxb. for Cd removal. Sci Total Environ 769:145159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145159
Rasam S, Moraveji MK, Soria-Verdugo A, Salimi A (2021) Synthesis, characterization and absorbability of Crocus sativus petals hydrothermal carbonized hydrochar and activated hydrochar. Chem Eng Process Process Intens 159:108236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2020.108236
Ghanim B, O’Dwyer TF, Leahy JJ, Willquist K, Ronan Courtney J, Pembroke T, Murnane JG (2020) Application of KOH modified seaweed hydrochar as a biosorbent of Vanadium from aqueous solution: Characterisations, mechanisms and regeneration capacity. J Environ Chem Eng 8(5):104176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104176
Rind IK, Memon N, Khuhawar MY, Lanjwani MF (2022) Thermally activated mango peels hydrochar for fxed-bed continuous flow decontamination of Pb(II) ions from aqueous solution. Int J Environ Sci Technol 19:2835–2850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03272-8
Katheresan V, Kansedo J, Lau SY (2018) Efficiency of various recent wastewater dye removal methods: a review. J Environ Chem Eng 6(4):4676–4697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.06.060
Zhou F, Li K, Hang F, Zhang Z, Chen P, Wei L, Xie C (2022) Efficient removal of methylene blue by activated hydrochar prepared by hydrothermal carbonization and NaOH activation of sugarcane bagasse and phosphoric acid. RSC Adv 12:1885–1896. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA08325B
Yikun Xu, Zhang J, Jia G, Ji D, Ding Y, Zhao P (2023) Evaluating malachite green removal from aqueous solution by hydroxyl enhanced hydrochar and biomass. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03647-y
Khoshbouy R, Takahashi F, Yoshikawa K (2019) Preparation of high surface area sludge-based activated hydrochar via hydrothermal carbonization and application in the removal of basic dye. Environ Res 175:457–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.04.002
Azharul Islam Md, Ahmed MJ, Khanday WA, Asif M, Hameed BH (2017) Mesoporous activated carbon prepared from NaOH activation of rattan (Lacosperma secundiflorum) hydrochar for methylene blue removal. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 138:279–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.01.010
Qian W-C, Luo X-P, Wang X, Guo M, Li B (2018) Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by modified bamboo hydrochar. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 157:300–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.088
He C, Lin H, Dai L, Qiu R, Tang Y, Wang Y, Duan P-G, Ok YS (2020) Waste shrimp shell-derived hydrochar as an emergent material for methyl orange removal in aqueous solutions. Environ Int 134:105340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105340
Tran TH, Le AH, Pham TH, Nguyen DT, Chang SW, Chung WJ, Duc Nguyen D (2020) Adsorption isotherms and kinetic modeling of methylene blue dye onto a carbonaceous hydrochar adsorbent derived from coffee husk waste. Sci Total Environ 725:138325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138325
Saleh M, Bilici Z, Ozay Y, Yabalak E, Yalvac M, Dizge N (2021) Green synthesis of Quercus coccifera hydrochar in subcritical water medium and evaluation of its adsorption performance for BR18 dye. Water Sci Technol 83(3):701–714. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.607
Azharul Islam Md, Ahmed MJ, Khanday WA, Asif M, Hameed BH (2017) Mesoporous activated coconut shell-derived hydrochar prepared via hydrothermal carbonization-NaOH activation for methylene blue adsorption. J Environ Manag 203:237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.029
Hou Y, Huang G, Li J, Yang Q, Huang S, Cai J (2019) Hydrothermal conversion of bamboo shoot shell to biochar: Preliminary studies of adsorption equilibrium and kinetics for rhodamine B removal. J Analyt Appl Pyrolysis 143:104694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2019.104694
Zhu X, Liu Y, Zhou C, Zhang S, Chen J (2014) Novel and high-performance magnetic carbon composite prepared from waste hydrochar for dye removal. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2(4):969–977. https://doi.org/10.1021/sc400547y
Peng X, Yan Z, Xi Cheng Yu, Li AW, Chen Li (2019) Quaternary ammonium-functionalized rice straw hydrochar as efficient adsorbents for methyl orange removal from aqueous solution. Clean Technol Environ Policy 21:1269–1279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01703-2
Li Y, Meas A, Shan S, Yang R, Gai X, Wang H, Tsend N (2018) Hydrochars from bamboo sawdust through acid assisted and two-stage hydrothermal carbonization for removal of two organics from aqueous solution. Biores Technol 261:257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.108
Neolaka YAB, Lawa Y, Naat J, Lalang AC, Widyaningrum BA, Ngasu GF, Niga KA, Darmokoesoemo H, Iqbal M, Kusuma HS (2023) Adsorption of methyl red from aqueous solution using Bali cow bones (Bos javanicus domesticus) hydrochar powder. Results Eng 17:100824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100824
Camilo FC, Peixoto T, de Araújo H, Quesada B, Moura AA, Moises MP, Bergamasco R, Faria SH, Dornellas MAS, de Barros, (2021) Synthesis of hydrochars derived from industrial laundry sludge and its application in the removal of cationic dye. J Water Process Eng 40:101999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.101999
Tabassum M, Bardhan M, Novera TM, Atikul Islam Md, Jawad AH, Azharul Islam Md (2020) NaOH-activated betel nut husk hydrochar for efficient adsorption of methylene blue dye. Water Air Soil Pollut 231:398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04762-0
Akkari I, Spessato L, Graba Z, Bezzi N, Kaci MM (2023) A sustainably produced hydrochar from pomegranate peels for the purification of textile contaminants in an aqueous medium. Sustain Chem Pharm 31:100924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2022.100924
Eskikaya O, Isik Z, Arslantas C, Yabalak E, Balakrishnan D, Dizge N, Rao KS (2023) Preparation of hydrochar bio-based catalyst for fenton process in dye-containing wastewater treatment. Environ Res 216(1):114357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114357
Kohzadi S, Marzban N, Libra JA, Bundschuh M, Maleki A (2023) Removal of RhB from water by Fe-modified hydrochar and biochar – An experimental evaluation supported by genetic programming. J Mol Liquids 369:120971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120971
Shareefa Ahmed Alshareef, Ayoub Abdullah Alqadami, Moonis Ali Khan, Hamdah S. Alanazi, Masoom Raza Siddiqui, Byong-Hun Jeon (2022) Simultaneous co-hydrothermal carbonization and chemical activation of food wastes to develop hydrochar for aquatic environmental remediation. Biores Technol 347:126363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126363
Qureshi UA, Hameed BH, Ahmed MJ (2020) Adsorption of endocrine disrupting compounds and other emerging contaminants using lignocellulosic biomass-derived porous carbons: a review. J Water Process Eng 38:101380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101380
Tran HN, Nguyen NB, Ly NH, Joo S-W, Vasseghian Y (2023) Core-shell Au@ZIF-67-based pollutant monitoring of thiram and carbendazim pesticides. Environ Pollut 317:120775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120775
Vasseghian Y, Sezgin D, Nguyen DC, Hoang HY, Yilmaz MS (2023) A hybrid nanocomposite based on CuFe layered double hydroxide coated graphene oxide for photocatalytic degradation of trimethoprim. Chemosphere 322:138243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138243
Seungwoon Sohn Vu, Huong T, Nguyen P-D, Ly NH, Jang S, Lee H, Lee C, Lee JI, Vasseghian Y, Joo S-W, Zoh K-D (2023) Equilibria of semi-volatile isothiazolinones between air and glass surfaces measured by gas chromatography and Raman spectroscopy. Environ Res 218:114908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114908
Delgado-Moreno L, Bazhari S, Gasco G, Méndez A, El Azzouzi M, Romero E (2021) New insights into the efficient removal of emerging contaminants by biochars and hydrochars derived from olive oil wastes. Sci Total Environ 752:141838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141838
Oumabady S, Selvaraj PS, Periasamy K, DavamaniVeeraswamy PR, Palanisami T, Ramasamy SP (2022) Kinetic and isotherm insights of Diclofenac removal by sludge derived hydrochar. Sci Rep 12:2184. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05943-z
Eduarda Freitas Diogo Januário, Taynara Basso Vidovix, Anna Carla Ribeiro, Elizabeth da Costa Neves Fernandes de Almeida Duarte, Rosângela Bergamasco, Angélica Marquetotti Salcedo Vieira (2022) Evaluation of hydrochar from peach stones for caffeine removal from aqueous medium and treatment of a synthetic mixture. Environ Technol https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2022.2138786
Yoo S-H, Lee S-C, Jang H-Y, Kim S-B (2023) Characterization of ibuprofen removal by calcined spherical hydrochar through adsorption experiments, molecular modeling, and artificial neural network predictions. Chemosphere 311:137074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137074
Araújo TP, Quesada HB, Federici D, dos Santos B, da Silva C, Fonseca JZ, Barbieri RB (2022) Acetaminophen removal by calcium alginate/activated hydrochar composite beads: Batch and fixed-bed studies. Int J Biol Macromol 203:553–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.177
Bouhcain B, Carrillo-Peña D, El Mansouri F, Zoubi YE, Mateos R, Morán A, Quiroga JM, Zerrouk MH (2022) Removal of emerging contaminants as diclofenac and caffeine using activated carbon obtained from argan fruit shells. Appl Sci 12(6):2922. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12062922
Netto MS, Georgin J, Franco DSP, Mallmann ES, Foletto EL, Godinho M, Pinto D, Dotto GL (2022) Effective adsorptive removal of atrazine herbicide in river waters by a novel hydrochar derived from Prunus serrulata bark. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:3672–3685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15366-4
Kim Anh Phan, Doungkamon Phihusut, Nattapong Tuntiwiwattanapun (2022) Preparation of rice husk hydrochar as an atrazine adsorbent: Optimization, characterization, and adsorption mechanisms. J Environ Chem Eng 10(3):107575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.107575
Chang J, Shen Z, Xiude Hu, Schulman E, Cui C, Guo Q, Tian H (2020) Adsorption of tetracycline by shrimp shell waste from aqueous solutions: adsorption isotherm, kinetics modeling, and mechanism. ACS Omega 5(7):3467–3477. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b03781
Aghababaei A, Azargohar R, Dalai AK, Soltan J, Niu CH (2021) Adsorption of carbamazepine from water by hydrothermally and steam activated agricultural by-products: equilibrium, site energy, and thermodynamic studies. Chem Eng Commun 209(6):852–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2021.1922893
Alshimaa E. Nassar, Eslam Ibrahim El-Aswar, Sameh A. Rizk, Seleem El-Sayed Gaber, Hossam S. Jahin (2023) Microwave-assisted hydrothermal preparation of magnetic hydrochar for the removal of organophosphorus insecticides from aqueous solutions. Separ Purific Technol 306(A):122569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122569
Islam MT, Sultana AI, Chambers C, Saha S, Saha N, Kawnish Kirtania M, Reza T (2022) Recent progress on emerging applications of hydrochar. Energies 15(24):9340. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249340
Ding L, Wang Z, Li Y, Yalei Du, Liu H, Guo Y (2012) A novel hydrochar and nickel composite for the electrochemical supercapacitor electrode material. Mater Lett 74:111–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2012.01.070
Jiang X, Shi G, Wang G, Mishra P, Liu C, Dong Y, Zhang P, Tian H, Liu Y, Wang Z, Zhang Qi, Zhang H (2019) A hydrothermal carbonization process for the preparation of activated carbons from hemp straw: an efficient electrode material for supercapacitor application. Ionics 25:3299–3307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-019-02850-8
Dai C, Wan J, Juan Y, Shanshan Qu, Jin T, Ma F, Shao J (2018) H3PO4 solution hydrothermal carbonization combined with KOH activation to prepare Argy wormwood-based porous carbon for high-performance supercapacitors. Appl Surf Sci 444:105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.261
Chen F, Zhang Y, Zheng M, Xiao Y, Hang Hu, Liang Y, Liu Y, Dong H (2022) Preparation of high-performance porous carbon materials by citric acid-assisted hydrothermal carbonization of bamboo and their application in electrode materials. Energy Fuels 36(16):9303–9312. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c01828
Ren M, Jia Z, Tian Z, Lopez D, Cai J, Maria-Magdalena Titirici A, Jorge B (2018) High performance N-doped carbon electrodes obtained via hydrothermal carbonization of macroalgae for supercapacitor applications. ChemElectroChem 5(18):2686–2693. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.201800603
Siva Sankari M, Vivekanandhan S (2020) Jatropha oil cake based activated carbon for symmetric supercapacitor application: a comparative study on conventional and hydrothermal carbonization processes. Chemistry Select 5(4):1375–1384. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201903492
Dat NT, Tran TTV, Van CN, Vo D-V, Kongparakul S, Zhang H, Guan G, Samart C (2020) Carbon sequestration through hydrothermal carbonization of expired fresh milk and its application in supercapacitor. Biomass Bioenergy 143:105836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105836
Pang L, Zou Bo, Zou Y, Han X, Cao L, Wang W, Guo Y (2016) A new route for the fabrication of corn starch-based porous carbon as electrochemical supercapacitor electrode material. Colloids Surf A 504:26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.05.049
Winata AS, Devianto H, Susanti RF (2021) Synthesis of activated carbon from salacca peel with hydrothermal carbonization for supercapacitor application. Mater Today Proceed 44(3):3268–3272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.515
Gege H, Ying W, Zhang Tianyun Wu, Xingxing CJ (2019) High-performance hierarchical N-doped porous carbons from hydrothermally carbonized bamboo shoot shells for symmetric supercapacitors. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 96:672–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2018.12.024
Fan Y, Yang X, Zhu B, Liu P-F, Hai-Ting Lu (2014) Micro-mesoporous carbon spheres derived from carrageenan as electrode material for supercapacitors. J Power Sources 268:584–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.100
Zenghua Xu, Zhang X, Li K, Lin H, Qian X, Sheng K (2020) Green synthesis of Fe-decorated carbon sphere/nanosheet derived from bamboo for high-performance supercapacitor application. Energy Fuels 35(1):827–838. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03614
Zenghua Xu, Zhang X, Liang Y, Lin H, Zhang S, Liu J, Jin C, Choe U, Sheng K (2020) Green synthesis of nitrogen-doped porous carbon derived from rice straw for high-performance supercapacitor application. Energy Fuels 34(7):8966–8976. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01346
Liu F, Gao Y, Zhang C, Huang H, Yan C, Chu X, Zhong Xu, Wang Z, Zhang H, Xiao X, Yang W (2019) Highly microporous carbon with nitrogen-doping derived from natural biowaste for high-performance flexible solid-state supercapacitor. J Colloid Interface Sci 548:322–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.04.005
Ding L, Zou Bo, Li Y, Liu H, Wang Z, Zhao C, Ying Su, Guo Y (2013) The production of hydrochar-based hierarchical porous carbons for use as electrochemical supercapacitor electrode materials. Colloids Surf A 423:104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.02.003
Khosravi A, Zheng H, Liu Q, Hashemi M, Tang Y, Xing B (2022) Production and characterization of hydrochars and their application in soil improvement and environmental remediation. Chem Eng J 430(4):133142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.133142
Sharma HB, Venna S, Dubey BK (2021) Resource recovery and circular economy approach in organic waste management using hydrothermal carbonization. Clean Energy Resou Recovery 1:313–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85223-4.00003-8
Sharma R, Jasrotia K, Singh N, Ghosh P, Srivastava S, Sharma NR, Singh J, Kanwar R, Kumar A (2020) A comprehensive review on hydrothermal carbonization of biomass and its applications. Chem Africa 3:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-019-00098-3
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RS: investigation, methodology, and writing—review and editing. PSK: conceptualization, validation, and supervision. GR: conceptualization, resources, and formal analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical approval
It is not applicable to this manuscript.
Consent to participate
It is not applicable to this manuscript.
Consent to publish
It is not applicable to this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sivaranjanee, R., Kumar, P.S. & Rangasamy, G. A recent advancement on hydrothermal carbonization of biomass to produce hydrochar for pollution control. Carbon Lett. 33, 1909–1933 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-023-00576-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-023-00576-2