Abstract
Gossypium herbaceum is reported to have innate adaptability to withstand biotic and abiotic stresses. However, the continued selection for desired traits eliminates the rare alleles from advanced cultivars and makes the species vulnerable to several stresses. The induced mutagenesis expands the genetic basis of the existing germplasm. In the present study, 5500 seeds of G. herbaceum (cv. WAGAD) were treated by 70 mM ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS), established 2597 fertile M1 plants, which were used in development of 6600 M2 plants followed by 5473 M3 plants. About 5% of the plants showed visible mutant phenotypes like sterility, chlorosis, altered leaf morphology and early flowering/late flowering. The phenotypic evaluation of 4453 plants for 11 agro-morphological traits revealed significant variations. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) profiling of a random set of 150 M3 plants revealed the considerable level of mutation in the genome. The developed mutant population could serve as an important genetic resource for forward and reverse genetic studies. Further, the potential mutant plants could also be used for pyramiding targeted traits and consequently for developing new high yielding varieties.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cotton (Gossypium spp.) is one of the major sources of natural textile fiber, livestock feed and human foodstuff. The commercial production of cotton comes from two allotetraploid species namely G. hirsutum (90%) and G. barbadense (8%), rest 2% from two diploid species (G. herbaceum and G. arboreum) (Kumar et al. 2021). The diploids are known for long maturity time, poor yield and fiber quality, but have a natural ability to withstand biotic and abiotic stresses (Kulkarni et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2012). In spite of better adaptability under harsh conditions, farmers do not prefer to grow diploid cotton due to poor productivity and fiber quality that fetches low price. On the other hand, limited efforts have been made to exploit the genetic potential toward its improvement (Parekh et al. 2018). At present, the demand for diploid cotton mainly G. herbaceum is increasing day by day as surgical cotton and technical textiles, which force improvement of its genetic potential towards higher lint production. The existence of satisfactory genetic variability in the gene pool provides a platform to devise suitable breeding strategies for genetic improvement however limited diversity has been reported in G. herbaceum (Jena et al. 2012; Parekh et al. 2016). Thus, alternative strategies need to be deployed to increase the genetic variation within the germplasm for further exploitation of genetic potential of this crop. Previously, gene expression studies have been carried out in mannitol-imposed drought stress using cultivar “WAGAD” of G. herbaceum and identified several novel genes (Ranjan et al. 2012). Some of the identified genes have characterized and validated their role in drought stress (Trivedi et al. 2012; Gunapati et al. 2016). But, most of them are of unknown functions and no homologs are reported in the public database. Thus, it is essential to explore the whole genome of WAGAD and characterize newly identified genes to better understand the drought tolerance mechanism at molecular levels. According to Khan et al. (2018), ambient temperature is increasing since the last decades and promoted the drought situation. Thus, WAGAD can be used in the varietal development programs of cotton breeding for drought stress tolerance.
The induced mutagenesis has a significant role in both crop improvement and studies on functional genomics. Among various mutagens, EMS is a widely accepted and utilized chemical mutagen for mutagenesis (Aslam et al. 2016). At the genetic level, it alkylates G nucleotide and leads GC to AC transitions, which results in point mutations throughout the genome. About 1/24 to 1/2500 kb mutation density have been reported in several crops (Kurowska et al. 2011). Among the molecular markers, the RAPD (Randomly amplified Polymorphic DNA) marker is amplified with short arbitrary primer, which amplifies the genomic DNA of targeted species without prior sequence information and produces polymorphic bands that is used in detection of generic diversity (Raj et al. 2014). The binding sites of these primers are changed (either loss or gain) in the mutated lines due to alteration of DNA against the control and detected by gel electrophoresis (Danylchenko and Sorochinsky, 2005). In previous reports, numerous mutant platforms of the model and crop plant species have been developed and identified phenotypic diversity followed by detection of induced mutation through sequencing and RAPD approaches such as wheat (Chen et al. 2012; Slade et al. 2012), tomato (Saito et al. 2011), Petunia (Krupa-Małkiewicz and Bienias 2018), alfalfa (Danylchenko and Sorochinsky, 2005), melon (Dahmani-Mardas et al. 2010) and Jatropha curcas (Dhakshanamoorthy et al. 2013; Maghuly et al. 2018). In the case of cotton, cultivated allotetraploid species has been used for the development of mutant population and used for identification of genome-wide mutations (Abid et al. 2020; Lian et al. 2020) as well as noble agronomic traits such as herbicide tolerance (Bechere et al. 2010) and good fiber quality (Brown et al. 2015). However, there is a low pace of research on G. herbaceum for its exploitation towards functional genomics studies and development of new varieties/lines (Kumar et al. 2021). Considering the importance of the G. herbaceum, efforts have been made to create new variability, which may either be used in functional genomics studies or crop improvement programs. Therefore, present work was conducted for phenotypic and molecular characterization of the mutant population and identification of potential variants for further exploitation in genetic improvement.
Materials and methods
Plant material and optimization of EMS concentration
The seed materials of G. herbaceum (cv. WAGAD) were obtained from CSIR-NBRI, Lucknow, India (Ranjan et al. 2012). To determine the appropriate optimum lethal concentration (LC50), two rounds of seed treatment tests were performed. A wider range of EMS doses e.g. 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 mM were tested in the first round. While, lower EMS doses were used i.e. 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90 mM in the second round of test as per the result obtained in the first round. Both rounds of tests were repeated three times. The EMS treatment of seeds were carried in flask kept of shaker for 16 h at 240C and 80 rpm. Hundred seeds were used for different concentrations of EMS treatment with control (0.0 mM, untreated). The treated seeds were rinsed under running tap water for 3 h and sown in a cotton growth house (Saveer Biotech Limited, New Delhi, India). Seed germination was recorded on 15 days and expressed in percentage to the nearest whole number.
Development of large mutant population
To develop the M1 population, 5500 seeds (M0 seed) were treated with 70 mM EMS (LC50) and harvested plant-wise self-pollinated M2 seeds from 2597 fertile M1 plants. Three M2 seeds from each M1 plant (3 × 2597 = 7791 M2 seeds) were sown in the next cropping season to raise M2 population and collected self-pollinated M3 seeds from 6600 M2 plants. Single plant per M2 derived M3 generation was used, which is equivalent to 3 plants from each M1 plant and sown a total of 6,500 M3 seeds (Table 1). The M1, M2 and M3 generations were grown in research field of CSIR-NBRI at Mahatma Gandhi Mission (MGM), Aurangabad (MS), India (19° 15' N; 75° 23' E). The spacing of plant to plant and line to line was maintained at 75 cm and 90 cm, respectively.
Phenotyping of M3 population and RAPD analysis
The visible observations were made at regular time intervals from germination to harvesting stage and noticed mutant phenotypes. In addition, quantitative data for 11 agronomic traits were recorded for induced diversity analysis against the control. The name of traits and their methods for data collection are described in supplementary table 1. To perform RAPD analysis, the genomic DNA was isolated from a random set of 150 M3 plants using plant DNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California) as per manufacturer’s instructions. The quality of DNA was assessed on 0.8% agarose gel and quantified using Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Life Technologies, USA). A set of 32 RAPD primers were used for preliminary screening. Finally, 14 RAPD primers with clear and reproducible amplification were selected for genotyping (Table 2). The PCR amplification was carried in 15 μL reaction volume with 50 ng genomic DNA, 10 pmol primer and 1X TopTaq PCR master mix (Qiagen Inc, USA). The PCR condition included pre-denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 43 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 35 °C for 1 min, extension at 72 °C for 1.30 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR product was separated on 1.2% agarose gel in 0.5X TBE buffer (Tris–Borate-EDTA). After electrophoresis, the gel was stained in ethidium bromide and visualized on Gel Doc XR (BioRad Laboratories, Inc). The mutation had considered from the change of RAPD amplified band position with respect to the control. RAPD bands were scored as 0–1 matrix, where ‘0’ indicates absence of band while ‘1’ indicates presence of band for each primer. The unclear (faint) bands were not considered for data scoring.
Statistical analysis
Microsoft Excel 2016 was used for the statistical analysis of the treatment viz., range of dispersion, mean, standard error and coefficient of variance (CV%). The mean values of M3 population and the control were analyzed by student's t-test (p ≤ 0.05). The frequency distribution graph was plotted with the help of PAST-3 software (Hammer et al. 2001). The 0–1 binary data of RAPD was used to compute pair-wise genetic dissimilarities among the selected plants using Jaccard’s similarity coefficient. The neighbor-joining (NJ) tree was constructed along with principal component analysis (PCA) using DARwin 5.0.157 software (Perrier et al. 2003).
Results and discussion
Optimization of lethal concentration of EMS
The rate of induced mutation depends on the effectiveness and efficiency of a mutagen followed by the duration of treatment as well as plant materials being treated (e.g., seed, pollen and vegetative part). The EMS is absorbed by treated samples which shows a genotoxic effect, can induce either DNA damage or inhibit the physiological processes that block/reduce enzyme activity and RNA synthesis (Kumar et al. 2013). The higher doses increase frequency of mutation but dramatically decrease the recovery of viable seeds, while too low concentration recovered less mutation (Chawade et al. 2010). In the present investigation the seed germination was decreased as the EMS concentrations increased (Fig. 1). Similar pattern was also reported in previous studies which have shown the effectiveness of mutagenesis in sunflower (Sabetta et al. 2011) and wheat (Rawat et al. 2018). According to Abid et al. (2020), the optimum lethal concentration of a mutagen provides maximum mutation density without paying off plant viability and fertility. For this, different concentrations of EMS were tested and tried to find LC50 before treating the bulk materials (Fig. 1). In the first round of treatment, about 30–70% of seed germination was assumed from the control between 50 to 100 mM (Fig. 1). Too higher doses of EMS (150 to 250 mM) were very effective but dramatically killed the seed and were discarded (Fig. 1). In the second round of lower doses test about 51% of seed germination was noticed at 70 mM (Fig. 1). While, 83, 74, 61, 46 and 41% of seed germination were counted at 40, 50, 60, 80 and 90 mM of EMS, respectively (Fig. 1). Based on these results, we concluded that 70 mM was the best as LC50 in the subsequent experiments. In previous studies, higher concentrations of EMS ranging from 1.5 to 2% have been tested for allotetraploid cotton (Abid et al. 2020; Lian et al. 2020). This may be due to genome buffering as reported for wheat mutagenesis (Rawat et al. 2018).
Phenotyping of M3 population
Out of 6500 M3 seeds sown, 5527 of them had survived till the maturity. Finally, M4 seeds were harvested from 5473 fertile M3 plants (Table 1). The control was well grown and 100% fertile. The higher mortality of germinated seedlings might be due to damage of cotyledon, root and shoot. Such mortality in the initial phase of mutagenesis may have occurred due to the increased homozygosity of the lethal mutation (Schreiber et al. 2019). Other studies by Espina et al. (2018) and Chantreau et al. (2013) have reported similar results for soybean and linseed, respectively. According to Saito et al. (2011), the population size is necessary to develop a saturated mutant resource, where every locus of the genome is mutated and needed more than thousands of individuals in the case of the EMS mutagenesis platform, suggesting that the current population was almost saturated. Furthermore, perceptible phenotypic variation was noticed in 276 plants (~ 5%), which were categorized into 6 groups and 17 subgroups (Table 3). According to Mardas et al. (2010), M1 mutation becomes homozygous in the subsequent generations, exploring the fact that all phenotypes might be due to homozygous condition of mutated gene/s that control a defined pathway/s. The major mutant phenotypes showed changes in leaf color, curly leaf, bushy plant growth (shorter internode and more branches) and round shape of boll (Fig. 2a–e), others identified mutations are listed in Table 3. The leaf color and plant growth-related mutations are reported as primary signal of induced mutagenesis. These have also been observed in other experiments that elucidated sufficient mutagenesis and reported a high rate of point mutations (Chantreau et al. 2013; Kumar et al. 2013). The validation of these mutant phenotypes can be useful in identifying the genes responsible for photosynthetic efficiency, plant growth and development (Abid et al. 2020). The most striking phenotypic variations observed in the field were 47 complete sterile and 7 partial sterile plants (Table 3).
The quantitative data were recorded from 4453 M3 plants. The lower and higher range of measured traits were highly scattered than control (Table 4) and formed a bell-shaped curve (Fig. 3a–k). This result suggested that the EMS mutagenesis has introduced additional variation in which intermediate phenotypes are more common than the extremes. Moreover, assessed CV had varied from 11.42 to 29.29%, which was higher than the control (Table 4). The maximum CV was recorded for the leaf size (29.29%) followed by number of branch/plant (29.27%), seed weight/plant (27.57%), biological yield/plant (27.25%), stem circumference (27.18%), lint weight/plant (28.17%), number of boll/plant (26.54%), number of node/plant (23%). The other traits were reported less than 20% (Table 4). The increased CV indicated a broad genetic base and heterogeneous nature of the population. The mean values revealed that most of the traits were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) varied from control except internodal distance and test weight (Table 4). Thus, M3 population has shown significant differences against the control for the recorded traits and suggested induced quantitative variation as previously reported in the mutant population of chili (Hasan et al. 2020), chickpea (Tiliouine et al. 2018) and lentil (Laskar and Khan 2017). Thus, quantitative variation of the population over the control would be of direct interest to plant breeders for the selection of superior line/s.
RAPD analysis
Sometimes, morphological variations cannot be observed due to gene redundancy and silent mutation. In such conditions, RAPD profiling for the small set of mutant with the control helps in detection of induced mutation at the DNA level at the primary stage. In the previous reports, such hidden variation has been explored by RAPD fingerprinting in wheat (Chen et al. 2012) and torch ginger (Yunus et al. 2013). In this study,14 RAPD primers were selected that gave 92 clear scorable bands (Table 2). The numbers of bands per primer ranged from 4 (OPZ-13) to 11 (OPG-02) with an average of 6.57 bands (Table 2). Of these, 68 (75.1%) bands were found to be polymorphic between the control and selected M3 plants (Table 2). The percentage of polymorphism varied from 33.3% (OPG-01) to 87.5% (OPE-20 and OPA-13) (Table 2). A representative gel electrophoresis image of the primer OPW-05 and OPE-20 are presented in Fig. 4a, b that showed a clear loss of bands in the number of amplified DNA fragment among M3 plants than the control. These polymorphic bands suggested induced mutation which may be either point mutation or small indels (insertion or deletion). In other studies, similar efforts have been made for sorghum (Taryonoand and Cahyaningrum, 2011) and J. curcas (Dhakshanamoorthy et al. 2013) by using six and twenty-five RAPD primers and reported comparable percentage of polymorphic bands, respectively. However, Aslam et al. (2017) reported a lower percentage of polymorphism among Capsicum annuum mutants. According to Raj et al. (2014), cluster analysis is a productive approach in diversity analysis that uses obtained numerical data of fingerprint and calculates distances between every pair of entities. In the present work, pair-wise genetic distance was calculated from the obtained binary data that ranged from 0.0 to 0.99 with an average value of 0.50 ± 0.07 (data not shown). The average genetic dissimilarity of each plant with other plants varied from 0.29 ± 0.29 (Control) to 1.00 ± 0.00 (Gh_mut_139). The highest degree of genetic dissimilarity was observed in Gh_mut_139 followed by Gh_mut_77 and Gh_mut_87 among the others and considered most divergent. The NJ dendrogram was created to better understand the similarity and dissimilarity among 150 M3 plants and grouped into three major clusters namely I, II and III (Fig. 5). Cluster I and II had further sub-divided into two sub-clusters as Ia, Ib and IIa, IIb, respectively. Sub-cluster IIa was found to be the largest with 67 plants while sub-cluster IIb was lowest with 4 plants. The control plant was clustered in IIa. Sub-cluster Ia and IIb had computed 66 and 5 plants, respectively. Cluster III was represented by 9 plants. In addition, PCA analysis also differentiated all the 150 M3 plants in to three major clusters almost similar to the NJ dendrogram (Fig. 6). Thus, both NJ dendrogram and PCA analysis of the present study have shown distinct clusters and subclusters due to the accumulation of induced mutations among M3 plants. As a result, current study gives information about the quality of the developed mutant resource that can be used in both functional genomics study and cotton breeding programs.
Conclusion
The aim of the current study was to utilize EMS mutagenesis and establish a saturated mutant population. A set of 5473 fertile M3 plants has been established and shown to possess considerable degree of phenotypic as well as genotypic polymorphism. These plants will serve as a potential resource for forward and reverse genetic studies. Further, phenotypically diverse plants will allow exploring causal point mutation for functional validation of genes responsible for growth and development as well as marker-assisted selection.
References
Abid MA, Wang P, Zhu T, Liang C, Meng Z, Malik W, Guo S, Zhang R (2020) Construction of Gossypium barbadense mutant library provides genetic resources for cotton germplasm improvement. Int J Mol Sci 21(18):6505. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21186505
Aslam U, Cheema H, Ahmad S, Khan IA, Malik W, Khan AA (2016) COTIP: cotton TILLING platform, a resource for plant improvement and reverse genetic studies. Front Plant Sci 7:1863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01863
Aslam R, Bhat TM, Choudhary S, Ansari MYK, Shahwar D (2017) Estimation of genetic variability, mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency in M2 flower mutant lines of Capsicum annuum L. treated with caffeine and their analysis through RAPD markers. J King Saud Univ Sci 29(3):274–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2016.04.008
Bechere E, Auld DL, Dotray P, Kebede H (2010) Registration of four upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genetic stock mutants with tolerance to Imazamox. J Plant Regist 4(2):155–158. https://doi.org/10.3198/jpr2009.08.0446crgs
Brown N, Smith CW, Hague S, Auld D, Hequet E, Joy K, Jones D (2015) Within-boll yield characteristics and their correlation with fiber quality parameters following mutagenesis of upland cotton, TAM 94L–25. Crop Sci 55(4):1513–1523. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.06.0442
Chantreau M, Grec S, Gutierrez L, Dalmais M, Pineau C, Demailly H, Paysant-Leroux C, Tavernier R, Trouve JP, Chatterjee M, Guillot X, Brunaud V, Chabbert B, Wuytswinkel O, Bendahmane A, Thomasset B, Hawkins S (2013) PT-Flax (phenotyping and TILLING of flax): development of a flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) mutant population and TILLING platform for forward and reverse genetics. BMC Plant Biol 13(1):159. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-159
Chawade A, Sikora P, Bräutigam M, Larsson M, Vivekanand V, Nakash MA, Chen T, Olsson O (2010) Development and characterization of an oat TILLING population and identification of mutations in lignin and beta glucan biosynthesis genes. BMC Plant Biol 10:86. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-86
Chen L, Huang L, Min D, Phillips A, Wang S, Madgwick PJ, Parry MAJ, Hu YG (2012) Development and characterization of a new TILLING population of common bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PLoS One 7(7):e41570. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041570
Dahmani-Mardas F, Troadec C, Boualem A, LeveˆQue S, Alsadon AA, Aldoss AA, Dogimont C, Bendahmane A (2010) Engineering melon plants with improved fruit shelf life using the TILLING approach. PLoS ONE 5(12):e15776. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015776
Danylchenko O, Sorochinsky B (2005) Use of RAPD assay for the detection of mutation changes in plant DNA induced by UV-B and γ-rays. BMC Plant Biol 5:S9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-5-S1-S9
Dhakshanamoorthy D, Selvaraj R, Chidambaram A (2013) Induced mutagenesis in Jatropha curcas L. using Ethyl methanesulphonate (EMS) and assessment of DNA polymorphism through RAPD markers. J Crop Sci Biotechnol 16(3):201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2010.11.004
Espina MJ, Ahmed C, Bernardini A, Adeleke E, Yadegari Z, Arelli P, Pantalone V, Taheri A (2018) Development and phenotypic screening of an Ethyl methanesulfonate mutant population in soybean. Front Plant Sci 9:394. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00394
Gunapati S, Naresh R, Ranjan S, Nigam D, Hans A, Verma PC, Gadre R, Pathre UV, Sane AP, Sane VA (2016) Expression of GhNAC2 from G. herbaceum, improves root growth and imparts tolerance to drought in transgenic cotton and Arabidopsis. Sci Rep 6:24978. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24978
Hammer Ø, Harper D, Ryan P (2001) PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4(1):9
Hasan N, Choudhry S, Laskar RA (2020) Studies on qualitative and quantitative characters of mutagenised chili populations induced through MMS and EMS. Vegetos 33(4):793–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-020-00164-z
Jena SN, Srivastava A, Rai KM, Ranjan A, Singh SK, Nisar T, Srivastava M, Bag SK, Mantri S, Asif MH, Yadav HK, Tuli R, Sawant SV (2012) Development and characterization of genomic and expressed SSRs for levant cotton (Gossypium herbaceum L.). Theor Appl Genet 124(3):565–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-011-1729-y
Khan A, Pan X, Najeeb U, Tan DKY, Fahad S, Zahoor R, Luo H (2018) Coping with drought: stress and adaptive mechanisms, and management through cultural and molecular alternatives in cotton as vital constituents for plant stress resilience and fitness. Biol Res. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-018-0198-z
Krupa-Małkiewicz M, Bienias A (2018) BSA and molecular markers screening for salt stress tolerant mutant of Petunia obtained in in vitro culture. Ciência Rural. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20170042
Kulkarni VN, Khadi BM, Maralappanavar MS, Deshapande LA, Narayanan S (2009) The worldwide gene pools of Gossypium arboreum L. and G. herbaceum L., and their improvement. Genetics and Genomics of Cotton pp 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70810-2_4
Kumar AP, Boualem A, Bhattacharya A, Parikh S, Desai N, Zambelli A, Leon A, Chatterjee M, Bendahmane A (2013) SMART–Sunflower mutant population and reverse genetic tool for crop improvement. BMC Plant Biol 13:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-38
Kumar U, Sawant SV, Yadav HK (2021) Exploring genetic variability in Ethyl methanesulfonate mediated mutant population of Wagad cultivar of Gossypium herbaceum. J Environ Biol 42(3):589–596. https://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/42/3/MRN-1399
Kurowska M, Daszkowska-Golec A, Gruszka D, Marzec M, Szurman M, Szarejko I, Maluszynski M (2011) TILLING-a shortcut in functional genomics. J Appl Genet 52(4):371–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-011-0061-1
Laskar RA, Khan S (2017) Assessment on induced genetic variability and divergence in the mutagenized lentil populations of microsperma and macrosperma cultivars developed using physical and chemical mutagenesis. PLoS ONE 12(9):e0184598. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184598
Lian X, Liu Y, Guo H, Fan Y, Wu J, Guo H, Gou Z (2020) Ethyl methanesulfonate mutant library construction in Gossypium hirsutum L. for allotetraploid functional genomics and germplasm innovation. Plant J 103(2):858–868. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14755
Maghuly F, Pabinger S, Krainer J, Laimer M (2018) The pattern and distribution of induced mutations in J. curcas using reduced representation sequencing. Front Plant Sci 9:524. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00524
Mardas FD, Troadec C, Boualem A, Leveque S, Alsadon AA, Aldoss AA, Dogimont C, Bendahmane A (2010) Engineering melon plants with improved fruit shelf life using the TILLING approach. PLoS ONE 5(12):e15776. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015776
Parekh MJ, Kumar S, Zala HN, Fougat RS, Patel CB, Bosamia TC, Kulkarni KS, Parihar A (2016) Development and validation of novel fiber relevant dbEST-SSR markers and their utility in revealing genetic diversity in diploid cotton (Gossypium herbaceum and G. arboreum). Ind Crops Prod 83:620–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.12.061
Parekh MJ, Kumar S, Fougat RS, Zala HN, Pandit RJ (2018) Transcriptomic profiling of developing fiber in levant cotton (Gossypium herbaceum L.). Funct and Integr Genomics 18(2):211–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-017-0586-4
Perrier X, Flori A, Bonnot F (2003) Data analysis methods. In: Hamon P, Seguin M, Perrier X, Glaszmann JC (eds) Genetic diversity of cultivated tropical plants. Enfield Science Publishers, Montpellier, pp 43–76
Raj A, Kumar S, Haq I, Kumar M (2014) Detection of tannery effluents induced DNA damage in mung bean by use of random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. ISRN Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/727623
Ranjan A, Nigam D, Asif MH, Singh R, Ranjan S, Mantri S, Pandey N, Trivedi I, Rai KM, Jena SN, Koul B, Tuli R, Pathre UV, Sawant SV (2012) Genome wide expression profiling of two accession of G. herbaceum L. in response to drought. BMC genom 13:94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-94
Rawat N, Schoen A, Singh L, Mahlandt A, Wilson DL, Liu S, Lin G et al (2018) TILL-D: An Aegilops tauschii TILLING resource for wheat improvement. Front Plant Sci 9:1665. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01665
Sabetta W, Alba V, Blanco A, Montemurro C (2011) sunTILL: a TILLING resource for gene function analysis in sunflower. Plant Methods 7:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-7-20
Saito T, Ariizumi T, Okabe Y, Asamizu E, Hiwasa-Tanase K, Fukuda N, Mizoguchi T, Yamazaki Y, Aoki K, Ezura H (2011) TOMATOMA: a novel tomato mutant database distributing Micro-Tom mutant collections. Plant Cell Physiol 52(2):283–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcr004
Schreiber M, Barakate A, Uzrek N, Macaulay M, Sourdille A, Morris J, Hedley PE, Ramsay L, Waugh R (2019) A highly mutagenised barley (cv. Golden Promise) TILLING population coupled with strategies for screening-by-sequencing. Plant Methods 15(1):99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0486-9
Slade AJ, Mcguire C, Loeffler D, Mullenberg J, Skinner W, Fazio G, Holm A, Brandt KM, Steine MN, Goodstal JF (2012) Development of high amylose wheat through TILLING. BMC Plant Biol 12(10):1186. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-69
Taryono T, Cahyaningrum P (2011) The detection of mutational changes in Sorghum using RAPD. Indones J Biotechnol 16(1)
Tiliouine WA, Laouar M, Abdelguerfi A, Cieslak JJ, Jankuloski L, Till BJ (2018) Genetic variability induced by gamma rays and preliminary results of low-cost TILLING on M2 generation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Front Plant Sci 9:156. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01568
Trivedi I, Ranjan A, Sharma YK, Sawant S (2012) The histone H1 variant accumulates in response to water stress in the drought tolerant genotype of Gossypium herbaceum L. Protein J 31(6):477–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-012-9425-6
Wang M, Wang Q, Wang B (2012) Identification and characterization of microRNAs in Asiatic cotton (Gossypium arboreum L.). PLoS One 7(4):e33696. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033696
Yunus MF, Aziz MA, Kadir MA, Daud SK, Rashid AB (2013) In vitro mutagenesis of Etlingera elatior (Jack) and early detection of mutation using RAPD markers. Turk J Biol 37:716–725. https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-1303-19
Acknowledgements
The authors thank to the director CSIR-NBRI and MGM for providing the facilities to carry out the present study. UK thanks to CSIR for the Fellowship (Junior Research Fellowship & Senior Research Fellowship).
Funding
The present study was funded by Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR) through a project “Genomics of medicinal plants and agronomically important traits (PlaGen)” (BSC 0107). The institutional assigned manuscript number is “CSIR-NBRI_MS/2020/06/03”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, U., Chavan, N.S., Sawant, S.V. et al. Evaluation and characterization of EMS induced mutant population of Gossypium herbaceum. Vegetos 35, 1036–1046 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-022-00385-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-022-00385-4