Abstract
Iron ore is essential in steel making; however, high-grade ores have diminished, making low-grade ores inevitable. These low-grade iron ores need further beneficiation to upgrade the iron content. Currently, traditional physical and chemical methods are utilized and are not environmentally friendly. Bio-beneficiation techniques have emerged as a sustainable alternative for mineral recovery. This review delves into recent bio-beneficiation advancements for enhanced low-grade iron ore recovery using microbes. Research has revealed that bio-beneficiation methods such as bio-leaching, bio-flotation, and bio-flocculation have proven successful in iron recovery from ores. The bio-beneficiation process occurs in mild conditions using bio-reagents derived from microbes and offers a reduction of chemicals used in processing. Bio-beneficiation of iron ore potentially offers a relatively energy-efficient, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly method of maximum iron ore recovery. However, this review has identified a scaling-up difficulty in which a future approach for industrial-use applications is offered following a thorough sustainability assessment. Bio-beneficiation, using microbial processes, provides a viable avenue for maximizing iron ore recovery while tackling the constraints of dwindling high-grade iron ore resources and environmental sustainability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The demand for iron ore has increased substantially as modern societies continue to fulfill their development goals. Due to the extensive exploitation of high-grade reserves, viable iron ore deposits are diminishing rapidly. Traditional beneficiation of low-grade iron ores is also challenging because of the complexity of their mineralogy. Developing sustainable, efficient, and enhanced iron recovery processes for low-grade ores is urgently needed [1,2,3,4].
Iron ore is predominantly found in the form of magnetite \(({{\text{Fe}}}_{3}{{\text{O}}}_{4})\), goethite \(({\text{FeO}}({\text{OH}}))\), hematite \(\left({{\text{Fe}}}_{2}{{\text{O}}}_{3}\right)\), siderite (FeCO3) and limonite (2Fe2O3·3H2O) [5]. Iron ore, an essential raw material in the global market, plays a critical role in sustaining several industries, particularly the steel industry [6, 7]. Worldwide, deposits of iron ore are estimated to be approximately 900 billion tons of crude ore [8]. Globally, the largest iron ore producers are Brazil, China, India, and Australia, producing approximately 70% of the world’s iron ore, whereas in Africa, South Africa leads in iron ore production at 4%, followed by Mauritania, Algeria, and Liberia with inferred deposits of crude ore of approximately 250 million tons [3, 4].
Iron ore extraction involves processes ranging from exploration to processing while utilizing traditional methods like gravity separation to innovative techniques like bio-leaching to enhance mineral recovery and minimize environmental impact [9]. Once extracted, raw iron ore undergoes beneficiation processes such as grinding and crushing, screening, washing, magnetic separation, and further concentration using froth flotation or leaching [10]. However, the choice of processing method depends on the ores’ physical and chemical properties. Emerging and innovative technologies such as bio-leaching, bio-flotation, and bio-reduction are being adopted for efficient recovery, reduced energy consumption, and the need for more environmentally friendly techniques [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Traditional iron ore beneficiation techniques are generally physical, requiring high energy, grinding, and filtration capacity [15]. Rising costs and increasing regulations threaten the long-term viability of these traditional processes.
Additionally, these processing techniques produce voluminous waste, leading to environmental hazards. As iron ore mining focuses on low-grade reserves, beneficiating these ores via traditional methods is challenging. Various researchers have reported challenges such as silica contamination, iron losses to slimes, and handling of fines that make it challenging to maintain a quality concentrate [11, 16,17,18,19,20]. Therefore, there is an urgent call to adopt alternative iron beneficiation techniques that are both economically and environmentally sustainable.
In this context, bio-beneficiation methods represent new opportunities as viable and sustainable alternatives to conventional iron ore processing by utilizing microorganisms to extract desired minerals from ores using their metabolite products. This minimizes the need for energy, water, and chemicals while reducing waste generation.
Bio-beneficiation technology utilizes microbiological interventions through processes such as bio-leaching, bio-flotation, and bioreduction to facilitate the recovery of minerals in an environmentally friendly and cost-effective manner [21]. Bio-leaching harnesses iron-oxidizing bacteria like Leptospirillum ferrooxidans, Leptospirillum ferriphilum, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, or Sulfolobus thermosulfidooxidans cultured in bio-reactors to solubilize metals via metabolite [22]. Research indicates that bio-leaching efficiency is comparable or superior to conventional methods for low-grade iron ores while generating negligible wastes [23,24,25]. During bio-leaching, the iron ore is attacked by microorganisms directly or indirectly, as shown in Fig. 1, removing the gangue minerals and leaving the iron behind [26].
Additionally, selective iron sulfide bio-flotation from ores using Bacillus methylotrophicus, Bacillus subtilis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa has shown promising results exceeding traditional flotation performance [10, 27, 28]. Further optimization of process and operating parameters like pulp density and particle size can improve bio-processes, allowing sustainable recovery [29, 30]. An overview of iron ore beneficiation techniques, including their limitations and environmental concerns, iron ore bio-beneficiation techniques, and future outlook toward mining sustainability, is presented and discussed in this manuscript.
2 Traditional Methods of Iron Ore Beneficiation and Their Limitations
Iron ore, the primary source of iron used in steel production for commercial use, often contains gangue mineral impurities such as alumina, quartz, and silica, which reduce iron content and affect the quality of the final products. Beneficiation, therefore, plays a critical role in iron ore grade improvement and enrichment by removal of those impurities [31,32,33]. Currently, the most used iron ore beneficiation techniques are gravity, magnetic separation, screening, crushing, and spiral concentration, as outlined in Fig. 2. These methods, however, are limited to high-grade iron ores and are less effective for ores with low iron concentrations (off-grade iron ore) [1, 34].
The crushing and screening separation technique reduces the runoff mine into small sizes by breaking and separating based on desired sizes. In this method, the fine waste particles are filtered during the initial concentration, and the focus is made on the coarse materials with a high iron ore content. This process may be either dry or wet, utilizing water as the main wetting agent. This conventional method, however, tends to generate large amounts of fine tailings and particulate matter as waste products [36, 37].
Gravity-based iron ore separation relies on density for effective recovery. The density differences between the iron ore and gangue minerals in the ore assist during separation. The crushed ore is washed over in the feed, jiggling and shaking tables, and spirals where the heavy iron ore particles settle faster, and the light gangue minerals are washed off as tailings. However, this technique is inefficient for lower grade concentration as it would require other methods for further beneficiation [19, 38].
Magnetic separation of iron ore happens by passing crushed iron ore over electromagnets. Highly magnetic iron ore is attracted to the magnets while the non-magnetic materials and gangue minerals drop away as tailings. This process produces high-content iron ore concentrates but is limited to low magnetic iron ores and, therefore, not suitable for processing low-grade iron containing fine iron [1, 12, 39].
In addition to physical iron ore beneficiation techniques, traditional chemical methods of iron ore beneficiation, such as leaching, froth flotation, and magnetic agglomeration, exist [31]. During leaching, iron is dissolved from the ores using acidic or alkali solutions, allowing the gangue minerals (impurities) to be washed away. Research done by Silva et al. [40] revealed that acid leaching using both nitric and hydrochloric acid reduced the phosphorous content in iron ore. However, more significant iron losses were reported due to the high reactivity of both acids, as shown in Eqs. (1)–(3). This method requires high reagent consumption and produces large volumes of chemical-laden tailings that are not friendly to the environment [41, 42].
In froth flotation, collectors are used to selectively bind the iron ore and float them from gangue minerals using air bubbles. Conventional chemicals used in froth flotation, such as cyanide, amines, and acids, tend to be exorbitant and toxic to the environment.
The magnetic agglomeration technique is used to finely concentrate ground iron and palletize it using magnetite or ferro silicone powders. This beneficiation process is inadequate for the selectivity of low-grade iron ores, utilizes toxic chemicals, and releases gasses that are not environmentally friendly [43, 44].
The main limitations shared by these conventional beneficiation methods are inadequate selectivity that leads to loss of iron in the tailings and the exorbitant and toxic chemical utilized in the recovery process. With the current strict environmental regulations and policies in the mining industry and the need for sustainability, these techniques pose massive inefficiencies.
2.1 Environmental Concerns of Traditional Iron Ore Beneficiation
The iron ore processing and the waste produced during beneficiation employing traditional methods pose significant environmental concerns. These issues include the following.
2.1.1 Land Use and Land Cover Change Impacts
Land use and land cover are radically altered during mineral extraction and waste storage. Open pits change the landscape and habitat during iron ore extraction, while tailing dumps cover vast lands. The tailings dumped may be laded with potentially toxic elements that affect the ecosystem [45].
2.1.2 Dust and Particulate Matter Emissions
Grinding, crushing, and screening produce voluminous fine particulates that end up polluting the air [43].
2.1.3 Acid Mine Drainage
Chemical leachate tailings may seep from the tailing dam, leaking potentially toxic metals and chemicals into the waterways and causing acid mine drainage [44].
Low recovery rates when utilizing traditional methods represent an inefficient use of these natural resources, as much of the iron in the ore is disregarded as waste rather than being utilized effectively.
In order to fully address the selectivity and environmental issues associated with conventional beneficiation techniques, research is focused on developing alternative beneficiation processes, such as utilizing bio-beneficiation techniques. Research using the bio-flotation method revealed that waste production is significantly reduced [46, 47].
The innovative techniques of using microbes and bacteria for beneficiation in leaching and flotation methods are promising for transformative iron ore beneficiation and target a cleaner and sustainable process. Developing bio-beneficiation techniques can provide a sustainable pathway to recovering more complex and low-grade ores currently mined due to high-grade depletion.
3 Bio-beneficiation of Iron Ore
Bio-beneficiation of iron ore is a mineral processing technique that utilizes microbes or microorganisms to selectively separate the needed minerals from gangue. Bio-beneficiation offers an alternative method to conventional and chemical methods of iron ore recovery. Some existing bio-beneficiation methods for iron ore recovery are bio-leaching, bio-flotation, and bio-flocculation. Bio-leaching methods utilize acidophile microbes such as Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans to dissolve iron from ores via the oxidation of iron ore and the production of sulfuric acid.
The use of microbes or microorganisms and their derived microbial products for mineral bio-flotation has resulted in significant advancements in the mineral beneficiation industry [4]. These microbes and their metabolite derivates have been extensively studied and used to selectively remove gangue minerals from ores to form concentrates [48, 49]. Various research has revealed that these microbes or their derivates are used during mineral processing to modify the surface of the minerals, depress gangue or required minerals, and, to some ores, act as collectors in froth flotation [30, 50, 51]. Bio-flocculation, on the other hand, utilizes microbes to aggregate fine gangue mineral particles for removal from ore slurries, thereby increasing the iron content of the concentrate [52, 53].
3.1 Bio-flotation of Iron Ore
Iron ore beneficiation is highly enhanced by utilizing different types of microbes that alter the surface of the particles, thereby aiding in the successful upgrading of iron. The effect of the activity of different microbes on the iron ores is summarized in Table 1.
3.2 Bio-leaching of Iron Ore
Bio-leaching is often used to recover minerals and metal elements in low concentrations for which other beneficiation methods would not recover efficiently. The most active microbes in bio-leaching are from the genus Thiobacillus, which are gram-negative and grow under aerobic conditions. Bio-leaching is most successful in acidic environments at low pH of 1.5 to 3 for effective dissolution of metal ions in the solution. On the other hand, Leptospillirum species, though acidophilic, cannot oxidize sulfur in sulfidic iron ores on their own unless combined with T. ferrooxidans or T. thiooxidans [58]. Members of the Acidithiobacillus, Pseudomonas, and Leptospirillum species are mesophilic acidophiles with high efficiency in bio-leaching iron ore [59, 60]
Research by Rouchalova et al. [61] revealed a high potential for recovery of iron by bio-leaching, utilizing the acidophilic microbial stain of Acidithiobacillus ferroxidans. The research further revealed that using an acid such as sulfuric acid to recover iron and other metals achieved lower yields than using microbes at an optimal pH of 1.8 and particle size of 71–100 µm. Research by Jones and Santini [62] on mechanisms of bio-leaching pointed out that bio-leaching is a complex process that requires a series of enzymes released by acidophiles to oxidize iron for effective recovery. The study also revealed that members of the Acidithiobacilus genes, such as ferivorans and ferriphilus, have succeeded in iron oxidation as they contain high potential iron protein (HIPIP). Further, it was discovered that Leptospirillllum ssp., Ferroplasma spp., Feroplasma acidarmanus, and Leptospirillllum ferrodiazotrophum species contain complex structures capable of oxidizing iron in bio-leaching [59].
Bio-leaching was successfully used in the dissolution of gangue minerals (zinc, phosphorus, potassium, and calcium oxide) in iron ore containing hematite (Fe2O3) and magnetite (Fe3O4), utilizing acidophile microbes in enhancing iron recovery. The bio-leaching process dissolved the impurities by 50% and increased iron recovery at the end of the microbial growth phase [63].
A study done to analyze the effectiveness of bio-leaching to remove phosphorous gangue in iron ore using Acidithiobacillus ferroxidans microbes revealed a successful removal of phosphorous by 6.2% and increased iron content [64,65,66].
Mixed cultures consisting of Ferroplasma acidiphilum, Sulfobacillus thermotolerans, and Leptospirillum ferriphilum were used to leach sulfur content in iron ore under varied pH, temperature, and pulp density conditions. Results revealed that at a pH of 1.8, pulp density of 15%, and operating temperature of 33 °C, bio-leaching yielded 80.05% of iron and decreased sulfur content by 95% [67].
A combination of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Sphingomonas sp. on bio-leaching of phosphorous gangue from hematite ore increased leaching by 1.5 times [68]. Exiguobacterium oxidotolerans microbial genes were found to be effective in dissolving iron from hematite under alkaline conditions [69]. The Exiguobacterium oxidotolerans microbes’ cell walls had direct contact with the iron ore and, therefore, exchanged electrons directly with iron (III) oxide via surface contact, aiding its reduction to soluble Fe(II), as shown in Fig. 3.
Though researchers have reported the successful use of microbes for bio-beneficiation using bio-leaching techniques, there remain both technical and biological challenges to their industrial application. The much time required for culturing and action on the ores of interest, including the tolerance of the microbes to heavy metals present in ores, needs genetic improvement to bring quicker results and save time. Such notable advancements have been made to T. ferrooxidans species [58].
3.3 Bio-flocculation of Iron Ore
Bio-flocculation is an iron ore beneficiation method utilizing microbes, bacteria, algae, or fungi to aggregate and flocculate fine iron ore particles for separation in slurries enriched with cultures. These bio-flocculants are extracellular polymeric substances like proteins and polysaccharides secreted by these microbes, hence inducing mineral flocculation [14, 70]. The mechanism of action of these bio-flocculants involves the binding and bridging of fine ore particles by biopolymers with high molecular weight and, therefore, the formation of flocs that settle out fast. Microbes used in flocculation include stains from Bacillus, Aspergillus, and Chlorella species.
Research on the evaluation of flocculation of ultrafine particles of hematite in iron ore tailing was done using a biosurfactant extracted from Candida stellata yeast. Analysis revealed that the biosurfactant efficiently modified the surface properties of the iron ore at a pH of 3.3 to recover iron by 90% successfully [71]. Metabolites and cell walls of Bacillus licheniformis microbe were used for bio-flocculation of goethite and hematite at varying concentrations of the biosurfactant, pulp density, and pH. The highest recovery of hematite and geothite was achieved between pH of 5 and 7 [72].
Gram-positive Bacillus cereus bacterium was isolated and cultured from Egyptian iron ore surface and solely used as a flocculation agent to recover hematite from silica gangue selectively. There was a successful removal of silica and a high recovery of hematite at 89.2% [73]. Paenibacillus polymyxa bacteria was used for hematite pretreatment to assist in flocculation at a pH of 6.5 and attained a 67.9% recovery of hematite. It was revealed that the bacterial walls were adsorbed onto the hematite, causing aggregation for the mineral and changing the size distribution of particles [74]. Farghaly et al. [75] investigated the use of Paenibacillus polymyxa as a surface modifier for the removal of manganese in iron ore, where a high efficiency of iron ore recovery was observed.
Candida parapsilosis was successfully used in the flocculation of − 38 microns of hematite. The microbe’s relative cell size and the hematite’s particle size assisted in the effective flocculation [76].
Different microbes, including heterotrophic and autotrophic yeast, fungi, and archaea, may act as beneficiation agents for iron ore recovery, as summarized in Table 2. These microbes solubilize gangue minerals such as silica and alumina, and their metabolites dissolve metal ions from the ore using hydrogen ions, forming soluble metals and chelates [77].
4 Environmental Impact and Sustainability of Iron Ore Beneficiation
Conventional and traditional beneficiation methods utilizing exorbitant and toxic chemicals in ore processing significantly impact the environment. Bio-beneficiation methods offer a more sustainable method of mineral processing, relying on microbes that usually operate at near-ambient conditions with minimal external energy requirements or chemical reagents for processing.
Bio-leaching and bio-flotation use sustainable sources of organic matter as nutrient sources for the microbes. Bio-flocculation, on the other hand, uses organic waste from other processes to effectively recover minerals. Furthermore, bio-beneficiation also assists with environmental restoration during mine closure by solubilizing nutrients like potassium and phosphorus during ore decomposition in the tailing dam. Responsible implementation of the iron ore recovery beneficiation method can enhance sustainability across the value chain. Further research should be done to assess the life cycle analysis (LCA) of bio-beneficiation processes to quantify and assert sustainability benefits against conventional and traditional approaches.
5 Constraints and Limitations of Bio-beneficiation
Bio-beneficiation, however, is posed with various challenges and limitations. These include scale-up challenges from bench laboratory studies to industrial-scale usage. The transition entails complexities such as ensuring consistent microbial activities, maintaining optimal conditions of the microbes, and handling large volumes of ores. The composition of the complex iron ores of low grade can also vary significantly, therefore affecting the bio-beneficiation technique. Adapting these intricate processes to accommodate variations in ore composition increases complexity during recovery and requires tailored solutions for different ores to increase efficiency, as the bio-beneficiation process operates at relatively slow rates compared to conventional methods using chemicals.
Assessing the technical and economic feasibility of the adoption of bio-beneficiation techniques necessitates thorough examinations of capital and operating expenses (CAPEX and OPEX), possible returns on investment (ROI), and competitiveness with methods. Environmental factors are also important, as bio-beneficiation may provide environmental benefits over traditional approaches; however, aspects such as bio-waste disposal and potential consequences on local ecosystems must be carefully evaluated and managed.
Regulatory and ethical requirements of industrial-scale bio-beneficiation technology may pose challenges, particularly regarding waste management and the safety of using microbial processes. Despite significant advancements, there are still gaps regarding the utilization of bio-beneficiation techniques in mineral processing. Addressing these challenges requires a collaborative approach between researchers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders to overcome the technical hurdles and ensure the successful implementation of mineral bio-beneficiation for a sustainable recovery.
6 Conclusions
Bio-beneficiation presents a long-term, environmentally friendly, and sustainable alternative to traditional iron ore processing methods. Bio-leaching, bio-flotation, and bio-flocculation have proved effective in increasing iron ore content in off-grade iron ores through the activity of microbes. Further research needs to be done to optimize these intricate processes and scale up laboratory studies to pilot studies and then to industrial applications. Bio-beneficiation has a high potential in iron ore processing in an environmentally friendly way, minimizing water, energy, and toxic chemicals. With continued research, development, and integration into mineral processing operations, bio-beneficiation is promising for sustainable iron ore recovery.
Data Availability
Data included in this review is referenced in the article.
References
Roy SK, Nayak D, Rath SS (2020) A review on the enrichment of iron values of low-grade iron ore resources using reduction roasting-magnetic separation. Powder Technol 367:796–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.04.047
Holmes RJ, Lu L (2015) “1 - Introduction: overview of the global iron ore industry,” In: Iron Ore Lu L Ed Woodhead Publishing, pp 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-156-6.00001-0
Ericsson M, Löf A, Löf O (2021) “Iron ore market report 2019–2020,” Gorn. Promyshlennost 2021(1):74–82. https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2021-1-74-82
Overman F (2011) IRON ORE. In: the manufacture of iron: In all its various branches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 17–79
Baioumy H, Omran M, Fabritius T (2017) Mineralogy, geochemistry and the origin of high-phosphorus oolitic iron ores of Aswan, Egypt. Ore Geol Rev 80:185–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.06.030
Clout JMF, Manuel JR (2015) “2 - Mineralogical, chemical, and physical characteristics of iron ore,” In: Iron Ore, Lu L Ed Woodhead Publishing, pp 45–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-156-6.00002-2
Mohr S, Giurco D, Yellishetty M, Ward J, Mudd G (2015) Projection of iron ore production. Nat Resour Res 24(3):317–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-014-9256-6
Gan M et al (2018) Clean recycle and utilization of hazardous iron-bearing waste in iron ore sintering process. J Hazard Mater 353:381–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.04.032
Ferreira H, Leite MGP (2015) A life cycle assessment study of iron ore mining. J Clean Prod 108:1081–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.140
Sarvamangala H, Natarajan KA, Girisha ST (2012) Biobeneficiation of iron ores. Int J Min Eng Miner Process 1(2):21–30. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.mining.20120102.01
Sahoo S, Sahu SN, Sahoo RK et al (2021) A study on removal of clay minerals from barbil region iron ore; Effect of scrubbing followed by pelletization. Min Metall Explor 38:105–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42461-020-00292-9
Dauce PD, De Castro GB, Lima MMF, Lima RMF (2019) Characterisation and magnetic concentration of an iron ore tailings. J Mater Res Technol 8(1):1052–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.07.015
Maranga SM, Bett AK, Ndeto K, Bett G (2013) Kenyan iron ore: mining and prospects of processing. http://eprints.nmlindia.org/7029
Dwyer R, Bruckard WJ, Rea S, Holmes RJ (2012) Bioflotation and bioflocculation review: Microorganisms relevant for mineral beneficiation. Trans Inst Min Metall Sect C: Miner Process Ext Metall 121(2):65–71. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743285512Y.0000000005
Kuranchie FA (2015) Characterisation and applications of iron ore tailings in building and construction projects. Edith Cowan University. Retrieved from. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1623
Cheneket BK (2018) Impact of iron ore mining on heavy metal concentration in soils of kishushe area in Wundanyi, Taita Taveta County. http://hdl.handle.net/11295/104789
Gleekia AM (2016) Assessment of environmental impact of iron ore mining and its mitigation measures
Krishna SJG, Patil MR, Rudrappa C, Kumar SP, Ravi BP (2013) Characterisation and processing of some iron ores of India. J Inst Eng Ser D 94(2):113–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-013-0030-4
He J, Liu C, Hong P, Yao Y, Luo Z, Zhao L (2019) Mineralogical characterization of the typical coarse iron ore particles and the potential to discharge waste gangue using a dry density-based gravity separation. Powder Technol 342:348–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.10.010
Jamieson HE (2011) Geochemistry and mineralogy of solid mine waste: essential knowledge for predicting environmental impact. Elements 7(6):381–386. https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.7.6.381
Adeleke R, Cloete TE, Khasa DP (2012) Culturable microorganisms associated with Sishen iron ore and their potential roles in biobeneficiation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28(3):1057–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-011-0904-2
Behera SK, Mulaba-Bafubiandi AF (2017) Microbes assisted mineral flotation a future prospective for mineral processing industries: a review. Miner Process Ext Metall Rev 38(2):96–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2016.1262861. (Taylor and Francis Inc)
Lata s, Sharma S, Kaur S (2023) “Bioleaching and biosorption of waste: approaches and utilization,” Bio-Based Mater Waste Energy Gener Resour Manag Present Emerg Waste Manag Pract Vol. 5 Adv. Zero Waste Tools, pp 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91149-8.00019-3
Xia JL, Peng AA, Huan H, Yu Y, Liu XD, Qiu GZ (2007) A new strain Acidithiobacillus albertensis BY-05 for bioleaching of metal sulfides ores. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 17(1):168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(07)60067-3. (English Ed)
Dong Y, Zan J, Lin H (2023) “Bioleaching of heavy metals from metal tailings utilizing bacteria and fungi: Mechanisms, strengthen measures, and development prospect.” J Environ Manag 344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118511
Lima R, Leite S, Pereira G, Amaral I, Sobral L (2012) Bioleaching of copper sulphide flotation concentrate in batch reaction system using mesophile and thermophile microorganisms. DYNA 79:133–140
Fazaelipoor MH, Khoshdast H, Ranjbar M (2010) Coal flotation using a biosurfactant from Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a frother. Korean J Chem Eng 27(5):1527–1531. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11814-010-0223-6/METRICS
Elmahdy AM, El-Mofty SE, Abdel-Khalek MA, Abdel-Khalek NA, El-Midany AA (2013) Bacterially induced phosphate-dolomite separation using amphoteric collector. Sep Purif Technol 102:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.09.033
Nangali DJ et al (2023) “Bioleaching of chalcopyrite using native Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans isolated in a mining area in Kitwe Zambia.” Sci Afr 22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01882
Behera SK, Manjaiah M, Sekar S, Panda SK, Mavumengwana V, Mulaba-Bafubiandi AF (2018) Optimization of microbial leaching of base metals from a south african sulfidic nickel ore concentrate by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Geomicrobiol J 35(6):447–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2017.1326543
31. Chikhale M, Tyagi K, Kumar R (2014) Beneficiation of hematite iron ore containing goethite impurity. IMPC 2014 - 27th International Mineral Processing Congress [Preprint]
Bett AK (2018) Investigation on the beneficiation methods for local iron ore for making steel. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4612
Bett G et al (2014) Beneficiation of iron ore in kishushe for the steel manufacturing plant. In: Proceedings of 2014 Int Conf Sustain Res Innov 7–11
Alabi OO, Alamza OR, Anuoluwapo OD (2016) “Froth flotation of Ajabanoko iron ore deposit in Kogi State towards Nigerian iron and steel development.” Int J Adv Eng Manag Sci 2(5):239473. Accessed: Dec. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.neliti.com/publications/239473/
Golev A et al (2022) “Ore-sand: A potential new solution to the mine tailings and global sand sustainability crises – Final Report,” no. April, pp. 2–104. Accessed: Jan. 13, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359893861_Ore-sand_A_potential_new_solution_to_the_mine_tailings_and_global_sand_sustainability_crises_FINAL_REPORT/figures?lo=1&utm_source=google&utm_medium=organic
Rodrigues AFDV, Delboni H, Silva K, Zhou J, Galvin KP, Filippov LO (2023) “Transforming iron ore processing – simplifying the comminution and replacing reverse flotation with magnetic and gravity separation.” Miner Eng 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MINENG.2023.108112
Barani K, Balochi H (2016) A comparative study on the effect of using conventional and high pressure grinding rolls crushing on the ball mill grinding kinetics of an iron ore. Physicochem Probl Miner Process 52(2):920–931. https://doi.org/10.5277/PPMP160231
Ajaka EO, Akande JM, Saliu MA (2014) Design of comminution circuit for optimum performance of the gravity separation unit at in-take iron ore processing plant, Nigeria. Innov Syst Design Eng 5:28–30
Chokin K, Yedilbayev A, Yugai V, Medvedev A (2022) “Beneficiation of magnetically separated iron-containing ore waste.” Processes 10(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/PR10112212
Silva L, Nascimento M, Oliveira E, Mota I, De Castro J (2016) “Evaluation of iron loss during the simultaneous acid leaching process for phosphorus and aluminum decrease in iron ore.” 10:2319–2399. https://doi.org/10.9790/2402-10227685
Zhang Y, M (1989) The removal of phosphorus from iron ore by leaching with nitric acid. Hydrometallurgy 21(3):255–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-386X(89)90001-7
Top S (2019) Separation of Fe and Mn from manganiferous iron ores via reductive acid leaching followed by magnetic separation. Min Eng 71(12):53–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-019-00113-8
Chaturvedi N, Patra HK (2016) Iron ore mining, waste generation, environmental problems and their mitigation through phytoremediation technology. 5:397–420
Jamieson HE (2011) Geochemistry and mineralogy of solid mine waste: essential knowledge for predicting environmental impact. Elements 7(6):381–386. https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.7.6.381
Gitau F, Maghanga JK, Ondiaka MN (2021) “Spatial mapping of the extents and volumes of solid mine waste at Samrudha Resources Mine, Kenya: a GIS and remote sensing approach.” Model Earth Syst Environ 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01192-7
Consuegra GL, Kutschke S, Rudolph M, Pollmann K (2020) “Halophilic bacteria as potential pyrite bio-depressants in Cu-Mo bioflotation.” Miner Eng 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2019.106062
Natarajan KA (2018) “Microbially induced mineral beneficiation.” Biotechnol Met 243–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804022-5.00010-4
Weissenborn PK, Warren LJ, Dunn JG (1994) Optimisation of selective flocculation of ultrafine iron ore. Int J Miner Process 42(3–4):191–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-7516(94)00026-3
Puelles JS, Merma AG, Olivera CAC, Torem ML (2021) Fundamental bioflotation aspects of hematite using an extracted Rhodococcus opacus by-product. REM - Int Eng J 74(3):353–362. https://doi.org/10.1590/0370-44672020740095
Deo N, Natarajan KA, Somasundaran P (2001) Mechanisms of adhesion of Paenibacillus polymyxa onto hematite, corundum and quartz. Int J Miner Process 62(1–4):27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-7516(00)00042-9
Smith RW, Misra M, Chen S (1993) Adsorption of a hydrophobic bacterium onto hematite: Implications in the froth flotation of the mineral. J Ind Microbiol 11(2):63–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01583676
Kayri M et al (2013) On the fundamental aspects of apatite and quartz flotation using a Gram positive strain as a bioreagent. Miner Eng 168(1):61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2012.10.018
De Mesquita LMS, Lins FF, Torem ML (2003) Interaction of a hydrophobic bacterium strain in a hematite–quartz flotation system. Int J Miner Process 71(1–4):31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-7516(03)00028-0
Sanwani E, Chaerun S, Mirahati R, Wahyuningsih T (2016) Bioflotation: bacteria-mineral interaction for eco-friendly and sustainable mineral processing. Procedia Chem 19:666–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proche.2016.03.068
Yang ZC, Feng YL, Li HR, Wang WD, Qing T (2014) Effect of biological pretreatment on flotation recovery of pyrolusite. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 24(5):1571–1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63227-1. (English Ed)
Merma AG, Olivera CAC, Hacha RR, et al (2019) Optimization of hematite and quartz BIOFLOTATION by AN artificial neural network (ANN). J Mater Res Technol 8:3076–3087. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMRT.2019.02.022
Merma AG, Olivera CAC, Torem MCL, Santos BF (2018) Comparison study of hematite bioflotation by r. erythropolis and its biosurfactant: experiments and neural network modeling. Chem Eng Trans 65:439–444. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1865074
Bosecker K (1997) Bioleaching: metal solubilization by microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev 20(3–4):591–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1574-6976.1997.TB00340.X
Abdollahi H, Ghassa S, Ebrahimi E, Mohammadzadeh A, Shahbaznejad M, Saneie R (2024) “Bio-beneficiation: relevance to mineral processing,” in Biotechnological Innovations in the Mineral-Metal Industry, Springer, pp 111–134
Da Silva LM, Giese EC, de Medeiros GA et al (2022) Evaluation of the use of burkolderia caribensis bacteria for the reduction of phosphorus content in iron ore particles. Mater Res 25. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2021-0427
Rouchalova D, Rouchalova K, Janakova I, Cablik V, Janstova S (2020) Bioleaching of iron, copper, lead, and zinc from the sludge mining sediment at different particle sizes, pH, and pulp density using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Miner 10(11):1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/MIN10111013
Jones S, Santini JM (2023) Mechanisms of bioleaching: iron and sulfur oxidation by acidophilic microorganisms. Essays Biochem 67(4):685. https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20220257
Núñez Ramírez DM et al (2019) A rheological study of the bioleaching process of an iron ore for the elimination of gangue minerals. Miner Eng 144:106023. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MINENG.2019.106023
Rea SM, Boxall NJ, Dwyer RB, Bruckard WJ (2022) “Application of biotechnology in iron ore beneficiation,” In: Iron ore, Elsevier, pp 457–486
Mishra S, Panda S, Akcil A, Dembele S (2023) Biotechnological avenues in mineral processing: Fundamentals, applications and advances in bioleaching and bio-beneficiation. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev 44(1):22–51
Mammadov K, Doutora P, Queiroz AM (2016) Dephosphorization of iron ore through bioleaching. http://hdl.handle.net/10198/13176
Shang H, Wen JK, Wu B, Mo XL (2015) Study on bioleaching of sulfur in iron ore by mixed culture. Adv Mater Res 1130:371–374. https://doi.org/10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/AMR.1130.371
Tekin D, Yoruk S, Tekin T (2012) The bioleaching of hematite by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans r4A1FC2B3. J Chem Soc Pakistan 34:920–922
Aneksampant A, Nakashima K, Kawasaki S (2020) Microbial leaching of iron from hematite: direct or indirect elution. Mater Trans 61(2):396–401. https://doi.org/10.2320/MATERTRANS.M-M2019860
Karthiga Devi K, Natarajan KA (2015) Production and characterization of bioflocculants for mineral processing applications. Int J Miner Process 137:15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2015.02.007
Camarate MC, Merma AG, Hacha RR, Torem ML (2022) Selective bioflocculation of ultrafine hematite particles from quartz using a biosurfactant extracted from Candida stellata yeast. Sep Sci Technol 57(1):36–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2021.1881972
Sadeghizadeh M, Hosseini MR, Ahmadi A (2017) Bioflocculation of hematite and goethite using Bacillus licheniformis (bio-flocculation of hematite and goethite). Miner Process Extr Metall Rev 38(3):151–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2017.1281130
Selim KA, Rostom M (2018) Bioflocculation of (iron oxide – silica) system using Bacillus cereus bacteria isolated from Egyptian iron ore surface. Egypt J Pet 27(2):235–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJPE.2017.07.002
Abdel-Khalek NA, Selim KA, Hassan MM, et al (2017) Bioflocculation of egyptian high manganese iron ore using paenibacillus polymyxa bacteria. Int Res J Eng Technol
Farghaly MG, Abdel-Khalek NA, Abdel-Khalek MA, Selim KA, Abdullah SS (2021) Physicochemical study and application for pyrolusite separation from high manganese-iron ore in the presence of microorganisms. Physicochem Probl Miner Process 51(1):273–283. https://doi.org/10.37190/PPMP/131944
Schneider IAH, Misra M, Smith RW (1994) Bioflocculation of hematite suspensions with products from yeast cell rupture. Dev Chem Eng Miner Process 2(4):248–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/APJ.5500020407
Zhang MM, Li HX, Andrade M, Xuan W, Correa A (2015) Feasible bioprocessing technologies for low-grade iron ores. Miner Metall Process 32(2):78–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03402424
Johnson DB (1998) Biodiversity and ecology of acidophilic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 27(4):307–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1574-6941.1998.TB00547.X
Dopson M, Baker-Austin C, Hind A, Bowman JP, Bond PL (2004) Characterization of ferroplasma isolates and Ferroplasma acidarmanus sp. nov., extreme acidophiles from acid mine drainage and industrial bioleaching environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 70(4):2079–2088. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.4.2079-2088.2004/ASSET/303AD9F8-2F72-47B6-9185-3E00F2AE5ECF/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/ZAM0040417720008.JPEG
Acuña J, Rojas J, Amaro AM, Toledo H, Jerez CA (1992) Chemotaxis of Leptospirillum ferrooxidans and other acidophilic chemolithotrophs: comparison with the Escherichia coli chemosensory system. FEMS Microbiol Lett 96(1):37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1097(92)90453-U
Anyakwo CN, Obot OW (2010) “Phosphorus removal capability of Aspergillus terreus and Bacillus subtilis from Nigeria’s Agbaja iron ore.” J Miner Mater Charact Eng 09(12):1131–1138. Accessed: Jan. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=20816amp;#abstract
Adeleke R, Cloetell E, Khasa D (2010) Isolation and identification of iron ore-solubilising fungus. S Afr J Sci 106:1–6. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v106i9/10.254
Delvasto P et al (2005) Exploring the possibilities of biological beneficiation of iron-ores: the phosphorus problem. Proceedings of the 15th Steelmaking Conference, 5th Ironmaking Conference & 1st Environment and Recycling Symposium IAS (CD-ROM), Argentinean Steelmaking Institute (IAS), San Nicolás 71–82
Natarajan KA, Usha Padukone S (2012) Microbially induced separation of quartz from hematite using yeast cells and metabolites. Miner Metall Process 29(2):81–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03402398/METRICS
Acknowledgements
Our appreciation also goes to the Metallurgical and Materials Engineering department at The Federal University of Technology for their support in using their facilities. Further, the authors appreciate Taita Taveta University for its collaboration on this research.
Funding
German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) exclusively funded this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gitau, F., Alabi, O.O., Aramide, F.O. et al. Towards a Sustainable and Enhanced Iron Ore Recovery: Bio-beneficiation Review. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 41, 1069–1078 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-024-00950-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-024-00950-2