Key summary points
To ascertain the prevalence of unreported urinary incontinence (UI) in a large sample of older adults, to profile factors associated with under-reporting of UI and the association of unreported UI with self-rated quality of life.
AbstractSection FindingsAlmost 40% of older people with UI had not reported their symptoms to a healthcare professional. On average those who did not report UI had visited their GP 4 times in the prior 12 months. Unreported UI was independently associated with poorer quality of life.
AbstractSection MessageThis study highlights the importance of asking specifically about symptoms of UI as part of comprehensive assessment of the older adult in and emphasises the need for increased education and awareness for older people around the importance of seeking help and reporting UI.
Abstract
Purpose
Concerns exist around under-detection and under-treatment of urinary incontinence (UI) in specific patient groups, particularly older people. The aim of this study is to ascertain the prevalence of unreported UI in a large sample of older adults, to profile factors associated with under-reporting of UI and the association of unreported UI with quality of life (QOL).
Methods
This study was embedded within the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing, involving a population-representative sample of almost 7,000 older adults (55% female, mean age 65 years). UI was defined as involuntary loss of urine from the bladder occurring on average at least twice per month. Unreported UI had not yet been reported to a healthcare professional. QOL was measured using the Control, Autonomy, Self-realisation and Pleasure-19 Scale (CASP-19).
Results
Almost 40% (285/750) of participants with UI had not reported symptoms to a healthcare professional despite visiting their general practitioner (GP) on average over 4 times in the last year. Logistic regression modelling demonstrated that under-reporting of UI was associated with female sex, taking < 5 medications, less severe symptoms and lower number of GP visits. Linear regression models show that unreported UI was associated with significantly lower CASP-19 (β = − 1.20 (95% CI: − 2.19 to − 0.20)).
Conclusion
Only 40% of older people with UI report symptoms to a healthcare professional despite frequent symptoms, and a significant association with poorer QOL. This highlights the need to educate older people around seeking help for UI, as well as opportunistically addressing UI as part of comprehensive age-attuned care.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Background
Urinary incontinence (UI) is one of the ‘giants’ of care of the older person [1]. It has been shown to increase the risk of falls [2], length of stay in hospital and mortality [3] and is associated with sedentary behaviours [4] and depression in later life [5].
Estimates of the prevalence of UI in an older population range widely, from 15–50% depending on the population sampled, and studies vary considerably in terms of recruitment, design and definition used for incontinence [6,7,8,9].
Common causes include stress UI, the involuntary leakage of urine during effort or exercise and urge UI, where urinary leakage occurs in the context of urgency. Prevalence is higher in females owing to pregnancy, childbirth and menopause. In males, benign prostatic hypertrophy may also contribute. While age-related changes in the urinary system predispose to UI, other co-existing factors such as polypharmacy and multimorbidity further increase the risk, making management more complex [10]. Important reversible causes in later life include urinary tract infections, urinary retention and constipation.
Despite this, UI improves with treatment [11], and it is therefore concerning that some studies have demonstrated significant under-detection of UI in specific patient groups [12, 13]. Potential reasons suggested for this include reluctance amongst older people to report symptoms and stigma around the condition [14].
The aim of this study therefore is to ascertain the prevalence of unreported UI in both males and females in a large well-described population-representative sample of older adults utilising data from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) and then examine factors associated with under-reporting of UI, as well as the association of unreported UI with QOL.
Methods
This is a cross-sectional study examining the prevalence and clinical characteristics of participants with UI in a large population-representative sample of community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 50 years.
Study design
This study is embedded within TILDA, a large population-based study of a nationally representative sample of community dwelling older adults aged ≥ 50 years. The TILDA study was designed to investigate how the health, social and economic circumstances of the older Irish population interact in the determination of ‘healthy’ ageing.
The TILDA study design has been outlined previously [15] but in short; participants were recruited using a stratified clustered procedure to randomly sample postal addresses from the Irish Geo-Directory (a listing of all residential addresses in the Republic of Ireland). All postal addresses in Ireland were assigned to one of 3155 geographic clusters; using RANSAM (a random sampling design for Ireland), a sample of 640 of these clusters was selected stratified by socioeconomic group and geography, where all household residents aged ≥ 50 years were eligible to participate. Data from Wave 2, collected between 2011 and 2012, were used for this analysis. Participants were excluded at baseline if they had a doctor’s diagnosis of dementia.
Urinary incontinence
UI was defined based on the International Continence Society Definition, i.e. involuntary loss of urine from the bladder [16]. We used a cut-off frequency of symptoms occurring on average at least twice per month over the last 12 months to define cases of UI.
Participants were asked ‘During the last 12 months, have you lost any amount of urine beyond your control?’ Those that said yes asked about frequency of symptoms.
Further questions asked to those who reported UI were:
-
Have you ever mentioned this problem to a doctor, nurse or other health professional?
-
Do you ever limit your activities, for example, what you do or where you go, because of UI?
-
How many times have you visited your general practitioner (GP) in the last 12 months?
Quality of life
QOL was measured using the Control, Autonomy, Self-realisation and Pleasure 19 Scale (CASP-19), which has been validated for use specifically in an older population [17]. This involves a self-reported questionnaire with 19 statements under four life domains (control, autonomy, self-actualisation and pleasure). Participants were asked to rank their response as either often, sometimes, not often, or never to each statement and an allocated score of 0 to 3 was assigned, with a total possible score of 57. A higher CASP-19 score therefore indicates greater QOL.
Other measures
Detailed social and biological data were collected at Wave 2. Educational attainment and smoking status were elicited by self-report. Alcohol excess was assessed using the CAGE Alcohol Scale. Polypharmacy defined as being prescribed 5 or more medications. Chronic disease burden was assessed by eliciting self-report of the following chronic conditions: lung disease, liver disease, cancer, Parkinson’s disease, arthritis, eye disease (age-related macular degeneration, cataracts or glaucoma). Participants were also asked regarding diabetes, hypertension and stroke. Cardiovascular disease was defined as self-report of angina, congestive cardiac failure or prior myocardial infarction. Depressive symptoms were defined as a score of ≥ 16 on the 20-item Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale [18] while cognitive impairment was defined as a score of ≤ 24 on the Mini Mental State Examination. Number of children was included as a surrogate marker for parity in the logistic regression models stratified by sex.
Statistical analysis
Data were analysed using Stata (Statacorp).
Normally distributed continuous variables were compared using Student’s t-test. Chi-square test was used for categorical variables.
Logistic regression models reporting odds ratios with unreported UI as dependent variable were used to analyse the association of variables of interest with unreported UI. The comparison group was individuals who had UI and had reported symptoms. Variables were chosen a priori based on their likely probability of association with UI.
Linear regression models with CASP-19 as the dependent variable were used to analyse the association of UI with QOL. Variables added to the model were again chosen a priori based on their likelihood of impacting on QOL.
A p value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Ethics
The TILDA study was approved by the Faculty of Health Sciences research ethics committee at Trinity College Dublin and all participants gave informed written consent. All experimental procedures adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Results
Prevalence of urinary incontinence
Over 10% (750/6,995) of participants had UI; 6% (180/3162) of males and 15% (570/3,833) of females. As shown in Table 1, participants with UI were older, more likely to be female, had higher rates of polypharmacy, higher chronic and cardiovascular disease burden and were more than twice as likely to have significant depressive symptoms when compared to participants without UI.
Overall, participants with UI had a higher number of GP visits within the preceding 12 months when compared to those without UI. Participants who had not yet reported UI to a healthcare professional had an average of more than four GP visits in the last year. Almost 8% of participants with unreported UI (22/285) had not visited their GP within the prior 12 months, compared to 4% of those with reported UI (18/465). See Table 1.
Reporting of symptoms
Almost 40% (285/750) of participants with UI had not reported their symptoms to a healthcare professional, while almost 30% (212/750) reported that UI limited their everyday activities in some way. Over one fifth (51/240) of those with ‘limiting’ UI had not reported their symptoms to a healthcare professional. Figure 1 demonstrates prevalence of UI, as well as the rate of reporting of symptoms to a healthcare professional, by age and sex.
As shown in Table 1, when compared to those with unreported UI, participants who had not yet reported symptoms to a healthcare professional were more likely to be female with lower rates of polypharmacy and cerebrovascular disease and less ‘limiting’ UI. Logistic regression models demonstrated that unreported UI symptoms were independently associated with female sex and symptoms that were less likely to impact on daily activities. Polypharmacy and having more than 4 visits to a general practitioner within the last year were associated with lower likelihood of unreported UI. Age, cognitive impairment and depressive symptoms were not significantly associated with reporting of UI. See Table 2.
Quality of life
As shown in Table 3, linear regression models show that both reported and unreported UI were associated with significantly lower self-rated quality of life.
Unreported UI (Unadjusted β = − 2.26 (95% CI − 3.36 to − 1.17)) had a stronger association with the CASP-19 than diabetes (Unadjusted β = − 2.21 (95% CI − 2.97 to − 1.44)) in unadjusted models. Other conditions associated with quality of life were prior stroke, depression, cognitive impairment, as well as chronic disease burden. Advancing age was not associated with a lower CASP-19; age range 65–74 years was associated with higher scores in the CASP-19 when compared to the 50–64-year-old age range.
Discussion
This study demonstrates that almost 1 in 10 people aged ≥ 50 years have UI, and that this figure rises to 1 in 6 of those aged ≥ 75 years. Over 40% of participants with UI in our study had not yet reported their symptoms to a healthcare professional, despite visiting their GP on average 4 times within the last 12 months, representing a missed opportunity to address UI.
While we have shown that participants with more severe UI are more likely to report symptoms, over one fifth of those with ‘limiting’ UI did not report symptoms and in this study, UI involved a considerable symptom burden of at least 2 episodes of incontinence per month. While under-reporting of UI symptoms is established in studies involving specific patient groups, particularly females [19,20,21], this is the first study to quantify the prevalence of unreported UI across both sexes in a population-based sample of older adults. Prior studies involving specific cohorts of female participants have shown that more bothersome UI symptoms and more regular physician visits were associated with reporting of UI symptoms [22], while older age, less functional impairment, lower BMI and the absence of cerebrovascular disease or asthma have also been associated with under-reporting of symptoms in a Korean-based study [21].
We have shown that older people, even those with UI that limits day-to-day activities, often do not report symptoms to a healthcare professional despite having the opportunity to do so. There are several reasons for under-reporting of UI symptoms, many of which could be addressed with appropriate educational and awareness campaigns. For example, the most commonly cited reasons in a survey of women who did not report UI were that symptoms weren’t severe enough, that they felt UI was an inevitable part of ageing or that they were not asked directly about UI [23].
Maintaining QOL is a primary goal in care of the older person. When we consider under-reporting and under-treatment of UI, the close association of UI with QOL scores we have demonstrated in this study is particularly relevant. Rather than addressing UI directly, many older people adapt using lifestyle modifications such as limiting their fluid intake, frequent toileting and wearing protective pads, which can restrict independence and have further negative consequences such as dehydration and increased risk of urinary tract infection. Specific treatment for UI has been shown to significantly improve symptoms and QOL however [11].
These findings also highlight that healthcare professionals should opportunistically ask about UI, particularly in at-risk groups. Our study demonstrates that, apart from females in general, specific groups with a higher likelihood of UI include those with a higher chronic disease burden, depression and polypharmacy. These associations, as well as existing evidence linking UI with frailty [24] and walking speed [25] highlight the importance of addressing UI as part of comprehensive care of the older person [26].
There are some limitations of this study which should be noted. UI was defined by self-reported symptoms only, and not by a clinical assessment but was based on International Continence Society definitions. Additionally, data on chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes and stroke was also elicited by self-report and may therefore be subject to reporting bias. Similarly, participants with minor UI symptoms may not recall discussing them with their GP. Specific strengths of this study include the large population-representative nature of the large cohort involved, as well as the comprehensive dataset including a broad range of sociodemographic and biological information included in the study. This is the first population-based study examining under-reporting of UI amongst older people with GP visit data.
In conclusion, 1 in 10 people aged ≥ 50 years have UI. UI is closely associated with polypharmacy, chronic disease and depression and is negatively associated with QOL. Despite this, only 40% of those with UI symptoms report them to a healthcare professional despite visiting their general practitioner on average 4 times over the last 12 months. This highlights the importance of asking specifically about symptoms of UI as part of comprehensive assessment of the older adult in and emphasises the need for increased education and awareness for older people around the importance of seeking help and reporting UI.
References
Isaacs B (1992) The Challenge of Geriatric Medicine. Vol. x Oxford; New York Oxford University Press pg. 244 Oxford Medical Publications.
Chiarelli PE, Mackenzie LA, Osmotherly PG (2009) Urinary incontinence is associated with an increase in falls: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother 55(2):89–95
John G, Gerstel E, Jung M, Dallenbach P, Faltin D, Petoud V et al (2014) Urinary incontinence as a marker of higher mortality in patients receiving home care services. BJU Int 113(1):113–119
Jerez-Roig J, Booth J, Skelton DA, Gine-Garriga M, Chastin SFM, Hagen S (2020) Is urinary incontinence associated with sedentary behaviour in older women? Analysis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS ONE 15(2):e0227195
Lai HH, Shen B, Rawal A, Vetter J (2016) The relationship between depression and overactive bladder/urinary incontinence symptoms in the clinical OAB population. BMC Urol 16(1):60
Murukesu RR, Singh DKA, Shahar S (2019) Urinary incontinence among urban and rural community dwelling older women: prevalence, risk factors and quality of life. BMC Public Health 19(Suppl4):529
Nitti VW (2001) The prevalence of urinary incontinence. Rev Urol 3(Suppl 1):S2–S6
Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S, Reilly K, Kopp Z, Herschorn S, et al (2006). Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol 50(6).
Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S, Norwegian EPINCONT study Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trøndelag (2000) A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trøndelag. J Clin Epidemiol 53(11):1150–1157.
Dubeau CE (2006) The aging lower urinary tract. J Urol 175(3 Pt 2).
Greer JA, Arya LA, Smith AL (2013) Urinary incontinence: diagnosis and treatment in the elderly. Curr Transl Geriatr Exp Gerontol Rep 2:66–75
Wallner LP, Porten S, Meenan RT, O’Keefe MC, Calhoun EA, Sarma AV et al (2009) Prevalence and severity of undiagnosed urinary incontinence in women. Am J Med 122(11):1037–1042
Cheung WW, Blank W, Borawski D, Tran W, Bluth MH (2010) Prevalence of overactive bladder, its under-diagnosis, and risk factors in a male urologic veterans population. Int J Med Sci 7(6):391–394
Schreiber Pedersen L, Lose G, Høybye MTT, Jurgensen M, Waldmann A, Rudnicki M (2018) Predictors and reasons for help-seeking behavior among women with urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 29(4):521–530
Donoghue OA, McGarrigle CA, Foley M, Fagan A, Meaney J, Kenny RA (2018). Cohort Profile Update: The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). Int J Epidemiol 47(5).
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2003) The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 61(1):37–49
Hyde M, Wiggins RD, Higgs P, Blane DB (2003) A measure of quality of life in early old age: the theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model (CASP19). Aging Ment Health 7(3):186–194
Vilagut G, Forero CG, Barbaglia G, Alonso J (2016). Screening for depression in the general population with the center for epidemiologic studies depression (CES-D): a systematic review with meta-analysis. PLos One 11(5).
Irwin DE, Milsom I, Kopp Z, Abrams P, EPIC Study Group (2008) Symptom bother and health care-seeking behavior among individuals with overactive bladder. Eur Urol 53(5):1029–1037
MacKay K, Hemmett L (2001) Needs assessment of women with urinary incontinence in a district health authority. Br J Gen Pract 51(471):801–804
Park J, Hong GR, Yang W (2015) Factors Associated With Self-reported and Medically Diagnosed Urinary Incontinence Among Community-Dwelling Older Women In Korea. Int Neurourol J 19(2):99–106
Waetjen LE, Xing G, Johnson WO, Melnikow J, Gold EB, Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) (2015) Factors associated with seeking treatment for urinary incontinence during the menopausal transition. Obstet Gynecol 125(5):1071–1079
Waetjen LE, Xing G, Johnson WO, Melnikow J, Gold EB, Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) (2018) Factors associated with reasons incontinent midlife women report for not seeking urinary incontinence treatment over 9 years across the menopausal transition. Menopause 25(1):29–37
Veronese N, Soysal P, Stubbs B, Marengoni A, Demurtas J, Maggi S et al (2018) Association between urinary incontinence and frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Geriatr Med 9:571–578
Lee WJJ, Liu CYY, Sun CCC, Chen LKK (2016) Walking speed, not muscle mass, is associated with urinary incontinence in community-dwelling old Taiwanese. Neurourol Urodyn 35(8):1057–1058
Oliver D (2016). David Oliver: The forgotten problem of incontinence. BMJ 353.
Funding
Financial support was provided by Irish Government, the Atlantic Philanthropies and Irish Life plc. These funders were not involved in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the paper or submission for publication. Any views expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Department of Health and Children or of the Minister for Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Ethical approval
The TILDA study was approved by the Faculty of Health Sciences research ethics committee at Trinity College Dublin.
Informed consent
All participants gave informed written consent.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sullivan, R., McNicholas, T., Claffey, P. et al. Unreported urinary incontinence: population-based prevalence and factors associated with non-reporting of symptoms in community-dwelling people ≥ 50 years. Eur Geriatr Med 12, 405–412 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00412-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00412-0