Abstract
In this work, we present a study of the nonlocal functional integro-differential equation with the nonlocal conditions. This study is different from the rest of the previous studies as we do the analytical study by studying the existence and uniqueness of the solution and also the continuous dependence of the proposed system. In addition, we apply all results of the analytical studying to some examples and find the exact solutions for them using the modified decomposition method. Also, we offer a numerical study of this system, unless it has been previously studied for the method of solving the proposed examples numerically using the finite difference-Simpson’s method. Some comparisons of numerical solutions are given with exact solutions to show the accuracy of the methods used, in addition to some figures that illustrate this.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Nonlocal boundary value problems (NBVP) for nonlinear differential equations have attracted great research efforts worldwide, as they arise from the study of many important problems in various such as engineering, mechanics, mathematical physics, vehicular traffic theory, queuing theory, fluid flows, electrical networks, rheology, biology and chemical physics. In practical applications and also several real world problems, it is important to establish the conditions for the existence solutions. Hence, many authors have investigated the existence solutions for various functional differential equation NBVP, “such as Srivastava et al. studied a class of nonlinear boundary value problems for an arbitrary fractional-order with the nonlocal integral and infinite-point boundary conditions [29], El-Sayed et al. discussed many various types for functional differential equations see [14,15,16,17]. Also, El-Owaidy et al. studied on an integro-differential equation of arbitrary (fractional) orders [13]. Moreover, different igniters have been studied for the differential equations by several researchers [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, 19,20,21,22, 24,25,26, 30,31,32]”. In this paper we study the NBVP for the functional integro-differential equation:
with
The existence of solutions \( u \in C[a,b]\) will be studied. The continuous dependence of the unique solution on \( u_0\), \(\zeta \) and \(a_k\) will be proved.
As applications, the nonlocal problem of Eq. (1) with the integral condition
will be studied.
In this paper, we discuss the NBVP (1) with (2) and (3). Also, we find the analytical and numerical solutions for Eq. (1) using the modified decomposition method [33] and finite difference-Simpson’s method since we apply the Simpson’s rule on an integral part and finite difference method [12, 27, 28] on the derivative part and therefore the equation will be converted into a system of nonlinear algebraic equations which can be solved together to get the unknown function, we apply the proposed method to some problems. In addition, we present some figures that show the accuracy of the proposed method. The form of the proposed equation has not been studied analytically or numerically before, therefore what we have presented is a clear contribution to this point. Also, most researchers deal with the topic only analytically, with some examples being given, but these examples are not dealt with numerically or analytically.
This paper is organized as follows: In “Integral Representation” section, we discuss the integral representation of the problem. In “Existence of Solution” section, the existence of a solution will be discussed. In “Uniqueness of the Solution” section, the uniqueness of the solution will be discussed. In “Continuous Dependence” section, we study the continuous dependence on the problem. In “Derivation of the Analytical and Numerical Methods” section, the derivation of the analytical and numerical methods introduce. In “Application” section, some examples are presented and we made a comparison between the exact solution to demonstrate the applicability of the method. Finally, we give a conclusion section.
Integral Representation
Consider the NBVP (1)–(2) with the following assumption:
-
1.
\(f : [a,b] \times {\mathbb {R}}^2 \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) satisfies Carathéodory condition. There exist a function \(c_1\in L_1[a,b] \) and a constant \(d_1 > 0\), such that
$$\begin{aligned} |f(s,\eta ,\phi ) |\le c_1(s)+d_1 |\eta |+d_1|\phi |. \end{aligned}$$ -
2.
\(g : [a,b] \times [a,b] \times {\mathbb {R}} \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) satisfies Carathéodory condition. There exist a function \(c_2: [a,b] \times [a,b] \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}},~~c_2\in L_1[a,b] \) and a constant \(d_2 > 0\), such that
$$\begin{aligned} |g(s,t,\eta ) |\le c_2(s,t)+d_2 |\eta |. \end{aligned}$$ -
3.
$$\begin{aligned} \sup _{x\in [a,b]} \int _a^x c_1 (s) ds \le M_1,\quad \sup _{x\in [a,b]} \int _a^x c_2 (\theta ,t) dt \le M_2. \end{aligned}$$
-
4.
\((2 d_1b^2+d_1 d_2 b^2) < 1.\)
Lemma 1
Let \( B=\sum _{k=1}^m a_k\ne 0\), the solution of the NBVP (1)–(2), if it exist, then it can be represented by the integral equation
where,
Proof
Integrating both sides of (1), we get
Let \(u'(x)=v(x)\) in (6), we obtain
where
using the condition (2), we obtain
then,
from (7), (8) and (10), we get
where,
\(\square \)
Existence of Solution
Theorem 2
Let the assumptions 1–4 be satisfied. Then the NBVP (1)–(2) has at least one solution \( u \in C[a,b]\).
Proof
Define the operator G associated with the integral equation (5) by
Let \(Q_r = \lbrace v \in R : ||v||_C\le r \rbrace \), where \(r=\frac{|\zeta | +M_1 +d_1 b B^{-1} |u_0| +d_1 b M_2}{1-(2 d_1 b^2 +d_1 d_2 b^2)}\).
Then we have, for \(v \in Q_r\).
This is proves that \( G: Q_r\rightarrow Q_r\) and the class of functions \(\lbrace G v \rbrace \) is uniformly bounded in \( Q_r\).
Now, let \(x_1,x_2 \in [a,b]\) such that \( |x_2-x_1|< \delta \), then
This is proves that the class of functions \( \lbrace G v \rbrace \) is equi-continuous in \( Q_r\). \(\square \)
Let \(v_n \in Q_r\), \( v_n \rightarrow v (n\rightarrow \infty )\), then from the continuity of the two functions f and g, we get \( f (x,\eta _n, \phi _n)\rightarrow f (x,\eta , \phi )\) and \( g (x,\eta _n, \phi _n)\rightarrow g (x,\eta , \phi )\) as \(n \rightarrow \infty \).
Also,
Using assumptions 1-2 and Lebesgue dominated convergence Theorem [23], we obtain
Then \(G v_n \rightarrow G v\) as \( n \rightarrow \infty \). This mean that the operator G is continuous in \(Q_r\). Then by Schauder Theorem [18] there exist at least one solution \( v\in C[a,b]\) of the Eq. (5). Thus, based on the Lemma 1, the NBVP (1)–(2) possess a solution \(u \in C[a,b]\).
Nonlocal Integral Condition
Theorem 3
Let the assumption 1–4 be satisfied, then the NBVP (1), (3) has at least one solution given by
where
Proof
Let \(v \in C[a,b]\) be the solution of Eq. (5). Let \(a_k=\mu (x_k)-\mu (x_{k-1})\), \(\mu \) is increasing function, \( \tau _k \in (x_{k-1},x_k)\), \( a= x_0< x_1< x_2<x_3<\cdots < x_m =b\) then, as \(m \rightarrow \infty \) the condition (2) will be
And
As \(m\rightarrow \infty \), the solution of the NBVP (1)–(2) will be
where
\(\square \)
Uniqueness of the Solution
Let f and g satisfy the following assumptions
-
(i)
\(f: [a,b]\times {\mathbb {R}}^2 \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) is measurable in x for any \(\eta ,\phi \in R \) and satisfies the Carathéodory condition
$$\begin{aligned} |f(s,\eta ,\phi )-f(s,w,z)|\le d_1 |\eta -w|+d_1 |\phi -z|, \end{aligned}$$ -
(ii)
\(g: [a,b]\times [a,b] \times {\mathbb {R}} \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) is measurable in x for any \(\eta ,\phi \in R \) and satisfies the Carathéodory condition
$$\begin{aligned} |g(s,t,\eta )-g(s,t,\phi )|\le d_2 |\eta -\phi |. \end{aligned}$$
Theorem 4
Let the assumptions \((i){-}(ii)\) be satisfied, then the solution of the NBVP (1)–(2) is unique.
Proof
From assumption (i) we have f is measurable in x for any \(\eta \), \(\phi \in R\) and satisfies the Carathéodory condition, then it is continuous in \(\eta ,\phi \in R\) for all \(x \in [a,b]\), and
Then the first condition is satisfied. Also by the same we can see that the second condition is satisfied by assumption (ii). Now, from Theorem 2 the solution of the Eq. (5) exists. Let v, w be two solutions of the Eq. (5), then
Hence
Since \(2 d_1 b^2 +d_1 d_2 b^2 < 1\), then \( w(x)=v(x) \) and the solution of the Eq. (5) is unique. Thus, based on the Lemma 1, the NBVP (1)–(2) possess a unique solution \(u \in C[a,b]\). \(\square \)
Continuous Dependence
Continuous Dependence on \( u_0\)
Definition 5
The solution \( u\in C[a,b]\) of the NBVP (1)–(2) depends continuously on \(u_0\), if
where \(u^*\) is the solution of the NBVP
with the condition
Theorem 6
Let the assumption of the Theorem 4 be satisfied, then the solution of the NBVP (1)–(2) depends continuously on \( u_0.\)
Proof
Let u, \(u^*\) be two solutions of the NBVP (1)–*(2) and (17)–(18) respectively. Then
Hence
And
Hence
Therefor the solution of the NBVP (1)–(2) depends continuously on \(u_0\). \(\square \)
Continuous Dependence on \( \zeta \)
Definition 7
The solution \( u\in C[a,b]\) of the NBVP (1)–(2) depends continuously on \(\zeta \), if
where \( u^*\) is the solution of the NBVP
with the condition
Theorem 8
Let the assumption of the Theorem 4 be satisfied, then the solution of the NBVP (1)–(2) depends continuously on \(\zeta \).
Proof
Let u, \(u^*\) be two solutions of the NBVP (1)–(2) and (19)–(20) respectively. Then
Hence
And
Hence
Therefor the solution of the NBVP (1)–(2) depends continuously on \(\zeta \). \(\square \)
Definition 9
The solution \( u\in C[a,b]\) of the NBVP (1)–(2) depends continuously on \(u_0\) and \(\zeta \), if
where \( u^*\) is the solution of the NBVP
with the condition
Theorem 10
Let the assumption of the Theorem 4 be satisfied, then the solution of the NBVP (1)–(2) depends continuously on \(u_0\) and \(\zeta .\)
Proof
Let u, \(u^*\) be two solutions of the NBVP (1)–(2) and (21)–(22) respectively. Then
Hence
And
Hence
Therefor the solution of the NBVP (1)–(2) depends continuously on \(u_0\) and \(\zeta \). \(\square \)
Continuous Dependence on \( a_k\)
Definition 11
The solution \( u\in C[a,b]\) of the NBVP (1)–(2) depends continuously on \(a_k\), if
where \( u^*\) is the solution of the NBVP
with the condition
Theorem 12
Let the assumption of the Theorem 4 be satisfied, then the solution of the NBVP (1)–(2) depends continuously on \(a_k.\)
Proof
Let \(B^* =\sum _{k=1}^m a^*_k\ne 0\) and \(v,v^*\) be two solutions of the NBVP (1)–(2) and (23)–(24) respectively. Then
Hence
And
Hence
Therefor the solution of the NBVP (1)–(2) depends continuously on \(a_k\). \(\square \)
Derivation of the Analytical and Numerical Methods
In this section, we present the methods used to study the proposed equation
A Brief Review of the Modified Decomposition Method
In this section we use the modified decomposition method to get the exact solution for nonlocal Fredholm integro differential equation. Firstly, we use the nonlocal condition to put Eq. (1) in the form
where \(\rho (x)\) is a known function, k(x, t) is the kernel of the integro -differential equation, \(\lambda \) is any constant, u(x) is the unknown function to be determined.
This method depends mainly on splitting the function \(\rho (x)\) into two parts, therefore it cannot be used if the function \(\rho (x)\) consists of only one terms. Now, we can express the procedure as follows
-
1
We substitute \(u(x)=\sum _{l=0}^\infty u_l (x)\) into both sides of Eq. (25).
-
2
We set \(\rho (x)=\rho _1(x)+\rho _2(x)\).
-
3
We use the following recurence relation
$$\begin{aligned}&u_0(x)=\rho _1(x),\\&u_1(x)=\rho _2(x)+ \lambda \int _{a}^{b} k(x,t)u'_0(t) dt,\\&u_{l+1}(x)=\lambda \int _a^b k(x,t) u'_l(t) dt, \ \ \ l\ge 1. \end{aligned}$$
If we make a proper choise of the function \(\rho _1(x)\), \(\rho _2(x)\), we can obtain the exact solution u(x) by using few iterations, and sometimes by calculating only two components.
Derivation of Numerical Method
To obtain the numerical solution of Eq. (1), we divide the domain [a, b] of Eq. (1) into N finite points as \(a = t_0< t_1< \cdots< t_{N-1}< t_N = b\). Using uniform step length \( h = (b-a)/N\) as \(x_i=a+i h\), \(i=0,1,2, \ldots , N\). Then we approximate the integral part of (1) by using the composite Simpson’s as follows
By taking \( u''_i = u'' (x_i),u'_i=u'(x_i), k(x_i,t_j )=k_{i,j}\), then (1) can be written as
And, we use centeral difference to approximate the derivative part of (26) as:
Then Eq. (26) can be written as
From Eq. (27), we can generate a system of equations for \(u_{-1}, u_{0}, u_1, u_2,\ldots , u_N, u_{N+1}\) which can be represent in a matrix form
where
\(A_{ij}=\frac{-4 h^2}{3} K_{ij},\quad B_{ij}=\frac{-2 h^2}{3} K_{ij}, \quad C_{ij}=\frac{- h^2}{3} K_{ij}, \quad Z=-4-2 h^2+C_{10}-B_{12},\quad Y=-4-2h^2+A_{21}-A_{23},\quad D=-4-2 h^2-A_{01}, \quad Q= -4-2h^2+A_{NN-1},\quad E=2+B_{22}-B_{24}, \quad I= 2+A_{11}-A_{13},\quad S=2+B_{NN-2}+C_{NN}\).
Error Estimation
Theorem 13
Suppose that \(\sigma _1\), \( \sigma _2 \), \( \sigma _3 \in [a,b]\) such that the errors \( e_1\) of Second order centeral, \( e_2\) of first order central difference, \(e_3\) of Simpson’s rule respectively are given by \( \frac{h^2}{12}u^{(4)} (\sigma _1 ) \), \(\frac{h^{2}}{6}u^{(3)} (\sigma _2 ) \), and \( \frac{(b-a)}{180} h^4 u^{(4)} (\sigma _3 ) \). Then we obtain the error estimation for the Eq. (1) by
where \( \mu =max\{u^{(4)} (\sigma _1), u^{(3)} (\sigma _2) \}, \) and N is the number of subinterval.
Proof
From Eq. (27), the exact solution for \(i=0,1,2,3,\ldots , N \).
Substracting (27) from (29), we obtain the error terms as follows:
Let \(\mu _1=u^{(4)} (\sigma _1)\), \(\mu _2=u^{(3)} (\sigma _2 )\), then
if we take \(\mu =max \{\mu _1, \mu _2\}\), then we have
Substituting \(h=\frac{b-a}{N} \) in (30), we get
Which is the error estimation. \(\square \)
Application
In this section, the existence Theorem 2 will be applied on some examples of nonlocal Fredholm integro differential equation and we solve it analytically by using the modified decomposition method, numerically by using the finite difference Simpson approach. The results obtained are tabulated in Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and, 6, all results for these examples are performed by using Mathematica.
Example 1
Consider the equation:
The exact solution of this equation is \(u(x)=x+x^2.\)
Firstly, we prove that this example has a continous solution,
Then,
and also
where \(c_1(x)= 2+\frac{1}{5} \left( -x^2-x\right) +\frac{1}{25} \left( -x-\frac{7 \cos (x)}{6}-\frac{1}{2}\right) , c_2(x,t)=\frac{1}{5}(x+t), d_1=\frac{1}{5}, d_2=\frac{1}{5}, b=1,\) then \(2d_1 b^2+d_1 d_2 b^2=\frac{2}{5}+\frac{1}{25}=\frac{11}{25} <1.\) It is clear that the Assumption 1–4 of Theorem 2 is satisfied, therefore the given NBVP has a continuous solution. Then, we use the modified decomposition method to obtain the exact solution of this example. From Eq. (31) we get
By using the modified decomposition method we can get the following recurrence relation
It is clear that each component of \(u_l, l \ge 1 \ \ \) is zero. This, in turn, gives the exact solution by
Now, we use the finite difference Simpson’s approach to find the numerical solution of this example. Table 1 and Fig. 1 below give the approximate solution of this example and compare with tha exact solution.
Now, we study the continous dependence on \(u_0\). If we take \(u^{*}(0)+u^{*}(0.5)=0.75001\), \({u^*}'(0)=1.00001\). Then, the exact solution of Example 1 is given by
Then,
Then, Example 1 is a continous dependence on \(u_0\). It is showing that in Fig. 2.
Now, we study the continous dependence on \(a_k\). If we take \(1.00001u^{*}(0)+1.00001u^{*}(0.5)=0.75\), \({u^*}'(0)=1\). Then, the exact solution of Example 1 is given by
Then,
Then, Example 1 is a continous dependence on \(a_k\). It is showing that in Fig. 3.
Example 2
Consider the equation:
The exact solution of this equation is \(u(x)= \sin (x).\)
Firstly we apply the assumption of Theorem 2 to prove that this example has a continuous solution:
Then,
and also
where \( c_1(x)=-\frac{2 \sin (x)}{3},c_2(x,t)=\frac{1}{3} \sin (x t), d_1=\frac{1}{3}, d_2=\frac{1}{3}, b=1, \) \(2d_1 b^2+d_1 d_2 b^2=\frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{3}\frac{1}{3}=\frac{7}{9}<1.\) It is clear that the Assumption 1–4 of Theorem 2 is satisfied, therefore the given NBVP has a continuous solution. Then, we use the modified decomposition to find the exact solution of this example. From Eq. (33) we get
By using the modified decomposition method we can get the following recurrence relation
It is clear that each component of \(u_l, l \ge 1\) is zero. This in turn gives the exact solution by
Now, we use the finite diffrence Simpson’s approach to find the numerical solution of this example. Table 2 and Fig. 4 below give the approximate solution of this example and compare it with the exact solution to show the accuracy of the method.
Now, we study the continous dependence on \(u_0\). If we take
Then, the exact solution of Example 2 is
Since
Then, Example 2 is a continous dependence on \(u_0\). It is showing that in Fig. 5.
Now, we study the continous dependence on \(a_k\). If we take
Then, the exact solution of Example 2 is
Since
Then, Example 2 is a continous dependence on \(a_k\). It is showing that in Fig. 6
Example 3
Consider the equation:
The exact solution of this equation is \(u(x)= \cosh (x)\).
Firstly, we apply the assumption of Theorem 2 to prove that this example has a continuous solution:
Then,
and also
where \(c_1(x)=\frac{6 \cosh (x)}{7}-\frac{(2+e) x}{28 e}, c_2(x,t)=\frac{1}{2} t x, d_1=\frac{1}{7}, d_2=\frac{1}{2}, b=1,\) \(2d_1 b^2+d_1 d_2 b^2=\frac{2}{7}+\frac{1}{7}\frac{1}{2} =\frac{5}{14}<1.\) It is clear that the Assumption 1–4 of Theorem 2 is satisfied, therefore the given NBVP has a continuous solution. Then, we use the modified decomposition method to find the exact solution of this example. From Eq. (35) we get
By using the modified decomposition method we can get the following recurence relation
It is clear that each component of \(u_l, l \ge 1\) is zero. This in turn gives the exact solution by
Now, we use the finite difference Simpson’s approach to finding the numerical solution of this example.
Table 3 and Fig. 7 below give the approximate solution of this example and compare it with the exact solution to show the accuracy of the presented method.
Example 4
Consider the equation:
The exact solution of this equation is \(u(x)= x \sinh (x)\).
Firstly, we apply the assumption of Theorem 2 to prove that this example has a continuous solution:
Then
and also
where \(c_1(x)=2\cosh (x)+\frac{1}{8}(-4-\sinh (1))-\sinh (x) +\frac{3}{4} x \sinh (x), c_2(x,t)=4(t+\sinh (x)), d_1=\frac{1}{4}\),
\(d_2=\frac{1}{2}, b=1\), \(2d_1 b^2+d_1 d_2 b^2=2 \frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{4}\frac{1}{2}=\frac{5}{8}<1.\) It is clear that the Assumption 1–4 of Theorem 2 is satisfied, therefore the given NBVP has a continuous solution. Then, we use the modified decomposition method to obtain the exact solution of this example. From Eq. (37) we get
By using modified decomposition method we can write the following recurence relation
It is clear that each component of \(u_l, l \ge 1\) is zero. This in turn gives the exact solution by
Now, we use the finite difference Simpson’s approach to finding the numerical solution of this example.
Table 4 and Fig. 8 below give the approximate solution of this example and compare it with the exact solution to show the accuracy of the method.
Example 5
Consider the equation:
The exact solution of this equation is \(u(x)= \ln (x)\).
Firstly, we apply the assumption of Theorem 2 to prove that this example has a continuous solution:
Then
and also
where \(c_1(x)=-\frac{1}{x^2}-\frac{\ln (x)}{15}+\frac{1}{60} (1-\ln (8x)), c_2(x,t)=\frac{1}{4} \ln (x t), d_1=\frac{1}{15}, d_2=\frac{1}{4}, b=2, 2d_1 b^2+d_1 d_2 b^2= \frac{8}{15} +\frac{1}{15}=\frac{9}{15}<1.\) It is clear that the Assumption 1–4 of Theorem 2 is satisfied, therefore the given NBVP has a continuous solution. Then, we use the modified decomposition to find the exact solution of this example. From Eq. (39) we get
By using the modified decomposition method we can get the following recurence relation
It is clear that each component of \(u_l, l \ge 1\) is zero. This in turn gives the exact solution by
Now, we use the finite difference Simpson’s approach to finding the numerical solution of this example.
Table 5 and Fig. 9 below give the approximate solution of this example and compare it with the exact solution to show the accuracy of the method.
From the results in Table 5 we can say that the proposed method is effective.
Example 6
Consider the equation:
The exact solution of this equation is \(u(x)=\sin (x)\).
Firstly we prove that this example has a continous solution:
Then,
and also
where \(c_1(x)= -\frac{1}{45} x \left( 2 x+3 \sin ^2(1)\right) -\frac{6\sin (x)}{5}, c_2(x,t)=\frac{2}{3}(t x)^2, d_1=\frac{1}{5}, d_2=\frac{2}{3}, b=1,\) then \( 2d_1 b^2+d_1 d_2 b^2=\frac{2}{5}+\frac{2}{15}=\frac{8}{15}<1.\) It is clear that the Assumption 1–4 of Theorem 2 is satisfied, therefore the given NBVP has a continuous solution. Then, we use the modified decomposition method to obtain the exact solution of this example. From Eq. (41) we get
By using modified decomposition method we can get the following recurence relation
It is clear that each component of \(u_l, l \ge 1\) is zero. This in turn gives the exact solution by
Now, we use the finite difference Simpson’s approach to finding the numerical solution of this example.
Table 6 and Fig. 10 below give the approximate solution of this example and compare it with the exact solution to show the accuracy of the presented method.
Now, we study the continous dependence on \(u_0\).
If we take \(\int _0^1 u^{*}(s) ds=1.00001-\cos (1),\quad u^{*'}(0)=1.00001.\) then the exact solution of Example 6 is given by
Since \(|u_0-u_0^*|=0.00001 \Longrightarrow \Vert u-u^*\Vert =4.122539 \times 10^{-17} x+2.23607 \times 10^{-5} \sinh \frac{x}{\sqrt{5}}+4.5086196\times 10^{-6}\cosh \frac{x}{\sqrt{5}}\leqslant 1.53037\times 10^{-5}\).
Then, Example 6 is a continous dependence on \(u_0\). It is showing that in Fig. 9.
Conclusion
In this work, the existence, uniqueness and the continuous dependence of the NBVP have been studied. Some examples are introduced to illustrate the benefits of our results, also, by using the modified decomposition method, we get the exact solution. Furthermore a numerical study of this system has been presented, by solving the proposed models numerically using the finite difference Simpson’s method. Some numerical solutions are compared with exact answers to show the accuracy of our methods, and some figures are obtained that illustrate this approach. It is evident from the presented Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 that the numerical results that we obtained are entirely consistent with the analytical study that we have carried out. Thus, through the survey that we conducted on some examples, one can say that we have made a clear contribution in solving the integral differential equations in the form of the proposed system analytically and numerically, in full accordance with the analytical study that conducted.
Data availability
Unavailable.
References
Ahsan, S., Nawaz, R., Akbar, M., Nisar, K.S., Abualnaja, K.M., Mahmoud, E.E., Abdel-Aty, A.-H.: Numerical solution of two-dimensional fractional order Volterra integro-differential equations. AIP Adv. 11(3), 035232 (2021)
Akram, S., Nawaz, A., Yasmin, N., Ghaffar, A., Baleanu, D., Nisar, K.S.: Periodic solutions of some classes of one dimensional non-autonomous equation. Front. Phys. 8, 264 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy
Baleanu, D., Jajarmi, A., Asad, J.H., Blaszczyk, T.: The motion of a bead sliding on a wire in fractional sense. Acta Phys. Pol. A 131(6), 1561–1564 (2017)
Baleanu, D., Rezapour, S., Saberpour, Z.: On fractional integro-differential inclusions via the extended fractional Caputo–Fabrizio derivation. Bound. Value Probl. 2019(1), 1–17 (2019)
Baleanu, D., Etemad, S., Rezapour, S.: On a fractional hybrid multi-term integro-differential inclusion with four-point sum and integral boundary conditions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020(1), 1–20 (2020)
Baleanu, D., Ghanbari, B., Asad, J.H., Jajarmi, A., Pirouz, H.M.: Planar system-masses in an equilateral triangle: numerical study within fractional calculus. CMES-Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 124(3), 953–68 (2020)
Baleanu, D., Jajarmi, A., Mohammadi, H., Rezapour, S.: A new study on the mathematical modelling of human liver with Caputo–Fabrizio fractional derivative. Chaos Solitons Fractals 134, 109705 (2020)
Baleanu, D., Sajjadi, S.S., Jajarmi, A.M.I.N., Defterli, O.Z.L.E.M., Asad, J.H.: The fractional dynamics of a linear triatomic molecule. Rom. Rep. Phys. 73(1), 105 (2021)
Baleanu, D., Sajjadi, S.S., Asad, J.H., Jajarmi, A., Estiri, E.: Hyperchaotic behaviors, optimal control, and synchronization of a nonautonomous cardiac conduction system. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021(1), 157 (2021)
Baleanu, D., Sajjadi, S.S., Jajarmi, A., Defterli, Ö.: On a nonlinear dynamical system with both chaotic and nonchaotic behaviors: a new fractional analysis and control. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021(1), 234 (2021)
Dineshkumar, C., Udhayakumar, R., Vijayakumar, V., Sooppy Nisar, K.: Results on approximate controllability of neutral integro-differential stochastic system with state-dependent delay. Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/num.22698
El-Danaf, T.S., Raslan, K.R., Ali, K.K.: Finite difference method with different high order approximations for solving complex equation. New Trends Math. Sci. 5(1), 114–127 (2017)
El-Owaidy, H., El-Sayed, A.M.A., Ahmed, R.G.: On an integro-differential equation of arbitrary (fractional) orders with nonlocal integral and infinite-point boundary conditions. Fract. Differ. Calculus 9(2), 227–242 (2019)
El-Sayed, A.M.A., Ahmed, R.G.: Existence of solutions for a functional integro-differential equation with infinite point and integral conditions. Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math. 5(4), 108 (2019)
El-Sayed, A.M.A., Ahmed, R.G.: Solvability of a coupled system of functional integro-differential equations with infinite point and Riemann–Stieltjes integral conditions. Appl. Math. Comput. 370, 124918 (2020)
El-Sayed, A., Gamal, R.: Infinite point and Riemann–Stieltjes integral conditions for an integro-differential equation. Nonlinear Anal.: Model. Control 24(5), 733–754 (2019)
El-Sayeda, A.M.A., El-Owaidyb, H., Ahmedb, R.G.: Solvability of a boundary value problem of self-reference functional differential equation with infinite point and integral conditions. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 21(4), 296–308 (2020)
Goeble, K., Kirk, W.A.: Topics in Metric Fixed Point Theory. Cambirdge Universty Press, Cambirdge (1990)
Karite, T., Boutoulout, A., Torres, D.F.,: Enlarged controllability and optimal control of sub-diffusion processes with caputo fractional derivatives. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.10199 (2019)
Kavitha Williams, W., Vijayakumar, V., Udhayakumar, R., Panda, S.K., Nisar, K.S.: Existence and controllability of nonlocal mixed Volterra–Fredholm type fractional delay integro-differential equations of order \(1< r< 2\). Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/num.22697
Khalid, A., Naeem, M.N., Ullah, Z., Ghaffar, A., Baleanu, D., Nisar, K.S., Al-Qurashi, M.M.: Numerical solution of the boundary value problems arising in magnetic fields and cylindrical shells. Mathematics 7(6), 508 (2019)
Khalid, A., Ghaffar, A., Naeem, M.N., Nisar, K.S., Baleanu, D.: Solutions of BVPs arising in hydrodynamic and magnetohydro-dynamic stability theory using polynomial and non-polynomial splines. Alex. Eng. J. 60(1), 941–953 (2021)
Kolomogorov, A.N., Fomin, S.V.: Introductory Real Analysis. Dover Publications Inc, Mineola, NY (1975)
Munusamy, K., Ravichandran, C., Nisar, K.S., Ghanbari, B.: Existence of solutions for some functional integrodifferential equations with nonlocal conditions. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 43(17), 10319–10331 (2020)
Mustafa, G., Ejaz, S.T., Baleanu, D., Ghaffar, A., Nisar, K.S.: A subdivision-based approach for singularly perturbed boundary value problem. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020(1), 1–20 (2020)
Qureshi, S., Jan, R.: Modeling of measles epidemic with optimized fractional order under Caputo differential operator. Chaos Solitons Fractals 145, 110766 (2021)
Raslan, K.R., Ali, K.K.: Numerical study of MHD-duct flow using the two-dimensional finite difference method. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 14(4), 693–697 (2020)
Raslan, K.R., EL-Danaf, T.S., Ali, K.K.: New numerical treatment for the generalized regularized long wave equation based on finite difference scheme. Int. J. Soft Comput. Eng. (IJSCE) 4, 16–24 (2014)
Srivastava, H.M., El-Sayed, A., Gaafar, F.M.: A class of nonlinear boundary value problems for an arbitrary fractional-order differential equation with the Riemann–Stieltjes functional integral and infinite-point boundary conditions. Symmetry 10(10), 508 (2018)
Sweilam, N.H., Abou Hasan, M.M.: Efficient method for fractional Lévy–Feller advection-dispersion equation using Jacobi polynomials. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.03143 (2018)
Vijayakumar, V., Ravichandran, C., Nisar, K.S., Kucche, K.D.: New discussion on approximate controllability results for fractional Sobolev type Volterra–Fredholm integro-differential systems of order \(1< {r}< 2\). Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/num.22772
Wang, G., Qin, J., Zhang, L., Baleanu, D.: Explicit iteration to a nonlinear fractional Langevin equation with non-separated integro-differential strip-multi-point boundary conditions. Chaos Solitons Fractals 131, 109476 (2020)
Wazwaz, A.-M.: The modified decomposition method for analytic treatment of differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 173, 165–176 (2006)
Acknowledgements
All authors thank the editor-in-chief of the journal and all those in charge of it.
Funding
There is no financial support or funding from any party for this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
If we look at the contribution of each author in this paper, we will find that each of them participated in the work from beginning to end in equal measure.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
There is no conflict of interest between the authors or anyone else regarding this manuscript.
Ethical statement
The authors confirm that all the results they obtained are new and there is no conflict of interest with anyone.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raslan, K.R., Ali, K.K., Ahmed, R.G. et al. An Extended Analytical and Numerical Study the Nonlocal Boundary Value Problem for the Functional Integro-Differential Equation with the Different Conditions. Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math 8, 70 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-022-01269-6
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-022-01269-6