Abstract
Let m and n be two positive integers such that \(m \le n\) and \(n \ge 3\). In this article, by the unstable K-theory method, we will study the homotopy types of gauge groups of the principal SU(n)-bundles over \(\mathbb {C}P^3\). Let \(\mathcal {G}_{l,k}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\) be the gauge groups of the principal SU(n)-bundles over \(\mathbb {C}P^3\), we will partially classify the homotopy types of \(\mathcal {G}_{0,k}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\) by showing that if there is a homotopy equivalence \(\mathcal {G}_{0,k}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\simeq \mathcal {G}_{0,k'}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\) then we have \((\frac{1}{2}(n-1)n(n+1)(n + 2), k)=(\frac{1}{2}(n-1)n(n+1)(n+2), k')\), when n is odd and \((\frac{1}{4}(n-1)n(n+1)(n + 2), k) = (\frac{1}{4}(n-1)n(n+1)(n+2), k')\), when n is even.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Let G be a topological group and let M be a topological space. Let \(P\rightarrow M\) be a principal G-bundle over M. The gauge group of this principal G-bundle, denote by \(\mathcal {G}(P)\), is the topological group of automorphisms of P, where an automorphism of P is a G-equivariant self map of P covering the identity map of M. The main problem is to classify the homotopy types of \(\mathcal {G}(P)\) as P ranges over all principal G-bundles over M for fixed G and M.
When G is a simple, simply-connected compact Lie group and M is a simply-connected closed four-manifold, then there is a one-to-one correspondence between the set of isomorphism classes of principal G-bundles over M and the homotopy set \([M, BG]\cong \mathbb {Z}\). Thus there are countably many equivalence classes of principal G-bundles over M. Each has a gauge group, so there are potentially countably many distinct gauge groups. While there are countably many inequivalent principal G-bundles, Crabb and Sutherland in [3] showed that their gauge groups have only finitely many distinct homotopy types. Let \(P_k \rightarrow M\) represent the equivalence class of principal G-bundle whose second Chern class is k and \(\mathcal {G}_k(M)\) be the gauge group of this principal G-bundle. In recent years there has been considerable interest in determining the precise number of homotopy types of these gauge groups and explicit classification results have been obtained. Let (a, b) be the their greatest common divisor of two integers a and b. When M is a spin 4-manifold, Theriault [14] showed that there is a homotopy equivalence
where t is the second Betti number of M. Thus the homotopy type of \(\mathcal {G}_k(M)\) depends on the special case \(\mathcal {G}_k(S^4)\). Many cases of homotopy types of \(\mathcal {G}_k(S^4)\) have been studied. When M is a non-spin 4-manifold, So [11] showed that there is a homotopy equivalence
Thus the homotopy type of \(\mathcal {G}_k(M)\) depends on the special case \(\mathcal {G}_k(\mathbb {C}P^2)\). Only a few of the homotopy types of gauge groups over simply-connected non-spin four-manifolds have been studied, which we mention some results in the following.
-
U(n)-gauge groups [2];
-
for \(G=SU(2)\), \(\mathcal {G}_k(M)\simeq \mathcal {G}_{k'}(M)\) if and only if \((6,k)=(6,k')\) [7];
-
if \(G = SU(3)\) then an integral homotopy equivalence \(\mathcal {G}_k(M)\simeq \mathcal {G}_{k'}(M)\) implies that \((12, k)=(12k')\), while \((12, k)=(12k')\) implies that there is a homotopy equivalence \(\mathcal {G}_k(M)\simeq \mathcal {G}_{k'}(M)\) after localizing rationally or at any prime [13];
-
for \(G = Sp(2)\), if \(\mathcal {G}_k(M)\simeq \mathcal {G}_{k'}(M)\) then \((20, k) = (20, k')\), and conversely, if \((20, k) = (20, k')\) then \(\mathcal {G}_k(M)\simeq \mathcal {G}_{k'}(M)\) when localized rationally or at any prime [12];
-
for \(G = Sp(n)\), if there is a homotopy equivalence \(\mathcal {G}_k(\mathbb {C}P^2)\simeq \mathcal {G}_{k'}(\mathbb {C}P^2)\) then we have \((4n(2n + 1), k) = (4n(2n + 1), k')\) [8].
So in [10] studies the homotopy types of SU(n)-gauge groups over non-spin 4-manifolds and shows that if \(\mathcal {G}_k(\mathbb {C}P^2)\) is homotopy equivalent to \(\mathcal {G}_{k'}(\mathbb {C}P^2)\), then \((\frac{1}{2}(n-1)n(n+1), k)=(\frac{1}{2}(n-1)n(n+1), k')\), if n is odd and \(((n-1)n(n+1), k) = ((n-1)n(n+1), k')\), if n is even.
In this article, we will study the homotopy types of SU(n)-gauge groups over \(\mathbb {C}P^3\) for \(n > 2\). This is the first time \(\mathbb {C}P^3\) gauge groups have been studied. Note that there is a one-to-one correspondence between the set of isomorphism classes of principal SU(n)-bundles over \(\mathbb {C}P^3\) and the homotopy set \([\mathbb {C}P^3, BSU(n)] \cong \mathbb {Z}\oplus \mathbb {Z}\). One copy of \(\mathbb {Z}\) corresponds to multiples of the map
where \(\epsilon _1\) generates \(\pi _6(BSU(n))\cong \mathbb {Z}\). The other copy of \(\mathbb {Z}\) corresponds to multiples of the map
where \(\epsilon _2\) generates \(\pi _4(BSU(n))\cong \mathbb {Z}\). Therefore the gauge groups are doubly-indexed, with \(\mathcal {G}_{l,k}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\) corresponding to the principal SU(n)-bundle determined by the map \(l\varepsilon _1 + k\varepsilon _2\). Since the classification results for \(\mathcal {G}_{l,k}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\) with \(l\ne 0\) are more complex, we will not study the homotopy types of \(\mathcal {G}_{l,k}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\) and only consider the case \(\mathcal {G}_{0,k}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\). We will partially classify the homotopy types of \(\mathcal {G}_{0,k}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\) by using unstable K-theory to give a lower bound for the number of homotopy types. We will prove the following theorem.
Theorem 1.1
Let \(n > 2\), if \(\mathcal {G}_{0,k}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\) is homotopy equivalent to \(\mathcal {G}_{0,k'}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\) then we have
2 Preliminaries
Let BSU(n) and \(B\mathcal {G}_{0,k}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\) be the classifying spaces of SU(n) and \(\mathcal {G}_{0,k}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\) respectively. Also, let \(Map_{0,k}(\mathbb {C}P^3, BSU(n))\) and \(Map_{0,k}^*(\mathbb {C}P^3, BSU(n))\) respectively be the components of the freely continuous and pointed continuous maps between \(\mathbb {C}P^3\) and BSU(n) containing the map \(\varepsilon _2\). Observe that there is a fibration
where ev evaluates a map at the basepoint of \(\mathbb {C}P^3\). By [1, 3], there is a homotopy equivalence
The evaluation fibration therefore determines a homotopy fibration sequence
where \(\alpha _k:SU(n) \rightarrow Map_{0,k}^*(\mathbb {C}P^3, BSU(n))\) is the boundary map.
In this article, we use the method in [10]. This article is organized as follows. In Sects. 3 and 4, respectively, in cases where \(n-m\) is an even integer and \(n-m\) is an odd integer, we first study the group \([\mathbb {C}P^m\wedge A, SU(n+1)]\), where A is the quotient \(\mathbb {C}P^{n-m+2}/\mathbb {C}P^{n-m}\). Then we study the subgroup of \([\mathbb {C}P^m\wedge A, SU(n)]\) which is then used in Sect. 5 to show that if \(\mathcal {G}_{0,k}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\simeq \mathcal {G}_{0,k'}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\) then \((\frac{1}{2}(n-1)n(n + 1)(n + 2), k)=(\frac{1}{2}(n-1)n(n+1)(n+2), k')\), when n is odd and \(n \ge 3\) and \((\frac{1}{4}(n-1)n(n+1)(n+2), k) = (\frac{1}{4}(n-1)n(n+1)(n+2), k')\), when n is even and \(n\ge 4\). In Sect. 5, we will prove Theorem 1.1.
3 The group \([\mathbb {C}P^m\wedge A, SU(n+1)]\) when \(n-m\) is even
Let A be the quotient \(\mathbb {C}P^{n-m+2}/\mathbb {C}P^{n-m}\). That is,
Put \(X=\mathbb {C}P^m\wedge A\). In this section, we first in case that \(n- m\) is an even integer and \(n\ge 3\) will study the group \([X, U(n + 1)]\) and then obtain the order of group [X, U(n)].
Denote the symmetric space \(U(\infty )/U(n+1)\) by \(W_{n+1}\). Recall that as an algebra
where \(c_i\) is the i-th universal Chern class and \(x_{2i+1}=\sigma c_i\), \(\sigma \) is the cohomology suspension and \(x_{2i+1}\) has degree \(2i+1\). Consider the projection \(\pi :U(\infty ) \rightarrow W_{n+1}\). As an algebra we have that the cohomology of \(W_{n+1}\) is given by
where \(\pi ^*(\bar{x}_{2i+1})=x_{2i+1}\). Consider the following fibre sequence
Applying the functor \([X,-]\) to fibration (3.1), there is an exact sequence as follows
Since \(W_{n+1}\) is \((2n+2)\)-connected, for \(i \le 2n+2\) we have \(\pi _{i}(W_{n+1})\cong 0\). By the homotopy sequence of the fibration (3.1), we have \(\pi _{2n+3}(W_{n+1})\cong \mathbb {Z}\) and also
Since \(\Sigma X\) is a CW-complex consisting only of odd dimensional cells, therefore we have
Thus we get the following exact sequence
Therefore we have the following lemma.
Lemma 3.1
\([X, U(n+1)] \cong Coker (\Omega \pi )_*\cong [X,\Omega W_{n+1}]/Im {\Omega \pi }_*\). \(\quad \Box \)
We need to obtain the \(Im {\Omega \pi }_*\). Define a homomorphism
by \(\lambda (\alpha )=(\alpha ^*(a_{2n+2}), \alpha ^*(a_{2n+4}))\), where \(\alpha \in [X, \Omega W_{n+1}]\), \(a_{2n+2}\) and \(a_{2n+4}\) are generators of \(H^{2n+2}(\Omega W_{n+1})\cong \mathbb {Z}\) and \(H^{2n+4}(\Omega W_{n+1})\cong \mathbb {Z}\) respectively. Note that for \(i= n, n+1\), \(a_{2i+2}=\sigma (\bar{x}_{2i+3})\in H^{2i+2}(\Omega W_{n+1})\). Since the cohomology class \(\bar{x}_{2i+3}\) represents a map \(\bar{x}_{2i+3}:W_{n+1} \rightarrow K(\mathbb {Z}, 2i+3)\) then \(a_{2i+2}\) is represented by a loop map \(\Omega \bar{x}_{2i+3}:\Omega W_{n+1} \rightarrow \Omega K(\mathbb {Z}, 2i+3)\cong K(\mathbb {Z}, 2i+2)\). Taking the product of such maps for \(i=n, n+1\), we obtain a map
Now the map \(\lambda \) is given by the following composition
In the following lemma we show that the homomorphism \(\lambda \) is monomorphism.
Lemma 3.2
The map \(\lambda \) is monic.
Proof
First, we need show to show the group \([X,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) is a free abelian group. We recall \(A=\Sigma ^{2n-2\,m} \mathbb {C}P^2=S^{2n-2\,m+2}\cup e^{2n-2\,m+4}\). Consider the following cofibration sequence
Apply \([\Sigma ^{2n-2m} \mathbb {C}P^2\wedge -,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) to the cofibration (3.2),we get the following exact sequence
We show that the terms \([\Sigma ^{2n-2\,m+1}\mathbb {C}P^2\wedge \mathbb {C}P^{m-1},\Omega W_{n+1}]\) and \([\Sigma ^{2n-1}\mathbb {C}P^2,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) are zero. Consider the following cofibration sequences
Now apply \([\Sigma ^{2n-2m+1}\mathbb {C}P^2\wedge -,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) to the cofibration (3.3), we get the following exact sequence
By apply \([\Sigma ^{2n-1}-,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) to the cofibration (3.4), we get the following exact sequence
When n is even then we get \([\Sigma ^{2n-1}\mathbb {C}P^2,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) is zero. When n is odd then we get the following exact sequence
Since the map f sends \(f_1:S^{2n+3} \rightarrow W_{n+1}\) to \(f_2 :S^{2n+4}\overset{\Sigma ^{2n+1}\eta }{\longrightarrow }S^{2n+3}\overset{f_1}{\rightarrow }W_{n+1}\), so the map f is surjective. Thus we get \([\Sigma ^{2n-1}\mathbb {C}P^2,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) is isomorphic to zero.
Again apply \([\Sigma ^{2n-2m+1}-\wedge \mathbb {C}P^{m-2}, \Omega W_{n+1}]\) to the cofibration (3.4), we get the following exact sequence
Since \(\Omega W_{n+1}\) is \((2n+1)\)-connected, we conclude that the terms \([\Sigma ^{2n-2m+5}\mathbb {C}P^{m-2},\Omega W_{n+1}]\) and \([\Sigma ^{2n-2m+3}\mathbb {C}P^{m-2},\Omega W_{n+1}]\) are zero. Therefore \([\Sigma ^{2n-2\,m+1}\mathbb {C}P^2\wedge \mathbb {C}P^{m-2} ,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) is isomorphic to zero. Therefore \([\Sigma ^{2n-2\,m+1}\mathbb {C}P^2\wedge \mathbb {C}P^{m-1},\Omega W_{n+1}]\) is isomorphic to zero. Thus there is an exact sequence
We show the group \([\Sigma ^{2n-2\,m}\mathbb {C}P^2\wedge \mathbb {C}P^{m-1},\Omega W_{n+1}]\) is a free abelian group isomorphic to \(\mathbb {Z}\). Again, apply \([\Sigma ^{2n-2m}\mathbb {C}P^2\wedge -, \Omega W_{n+1}]\) to the cofibration (3.3), we get the following exact sequence
Note that the first term \([\Sigma ^{2n-2\,m+1}\mathbb {C}P^2\wedge \mathbb {C}P^{m-2},\Omega W_{n+1}]\) is zero, it is due to the connectivity of \(\Omega W_{n+1}\). Similarly we have that the last term \([\Sigma ^{2n-2\,m}\mathbb {C}P^2\wedge \mathbb {C}P^{m-2},\Omega W_{n+1}]\) is also zero. By apply \([\Sigma ^{2n-2}-,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) to the cofibration (3.4), we can conclude that \([\Sigma ^{2n-2}\mathbb {C}P^2,\Omega W_{n+1}]\cong \pi _{2n+2}(\Omega W_{n+1})\cong \mathbb {Z}\). Therefore we obtain \([\Sigma ^{2n-2\,m}\mathbb {C}P^2\wedge \mathbb {C}P^{m-1},\Omega W_{n+1}]\) is isomorphic to \(\mathbb {Z}\). Also by [9], we know that \([\Sigma ^{2n}\mathbb {C}P^2,\Omega W_{n+1}]\cong \mathbb {Z}\oplus \mathbb {Z}\). Therefore we obtain the exact sequence
thus by exactness we conclude that there is a splitting that gives \([\mathbb {C}P^m\wedge A,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) is a free abelian group isomorphic to \(\mathbb {Z}\oplus \mathbb {Z}\oplus \mathbb {Z}\). Now, since the maps \((a_{2n+2})^*:H^{2n+2}(K(\mathbb {Z}, 2n+2))\rightarrow H^{2n+2}(\Omega W_{n+1})\) and \((a_{2n+4})^*:H^{2n+4}(K(\mathbb {Z}, 2n+4))\rightarrow H^{2n+4}(\Omega W_{n+1})\) are isomorphism, the map \(a^*:H^j(K(\mathbb {Z}, 2n+2)\times K(\mathbb {Z}, 2n+4))\rightarrow H^j(\Omega W_{n+1})\) is also isomorphism for \(j=2n+2\) and \(2n+4\). Since \([X, \Omega W_{n+1}]\) is a free abelian group then the map \(\lambda \) is monomorphism. \(\square \)
Recall that \(H^*(\mathbb {C}P^m)= \mathbb {Z}[t]/(t^{m+1})\), where \(|t|=2\) and \(K(\mathbb {C}P^m)= \mathbb {Z}[x]/(x^{m+1})\). Let \(\zeta _n\) be a generator of \(\tilde{K}^0(S^{2n})\). Note that \(\tilde{K}^0(X=\mathbb {C}P^m\wedge \Sigma ^{2n-2m}\mathbb {C}P^2)\) is a free abelian group generated by \(\theta _{i,j}=\zeta _{n-m}\otimes x^i\otimes x^j\), where \(1\le i \le m\) and \(1 \le j \le 2\), with the following Chern characters
similarly
where
We will prove the following proposition.
Proposition 3.3
Im \(\lambda \circ (\Omega \pi )_*\) is generated by \(\alpha _{i,j}\), for \(1 \le i \le m\) and \(1\le j \le 2\), where
Proof
According to the definition of the map \(\lambda \), we have
The calculation of the first component is as follows
and calculation the second component is as follows
Therefore we have
Similarly we can show
\(\square \)
Now consider the map \({\alpha _k}_*:[\Sigma A, SU(n)]\rightarrow [\Sigma A,Map_0^*(\mathbb {C}P^m, BSU(n))]\). Note that the group \([\Sigma A, SU(n)]\) is isomorphic to \(\tilde{K}^1(\Sigma A)\cong \tilde{K}^0(\Sigma ^2 A)\cong \mathbb {Z}\oplus \mathbb {Z}\) and is a free abelian group generated by \(\xi _i = \zeta _{n-m+1}\otimes x^i\) for \(i=1, 2\). Let \(\varepsilon _{m,n}:S^{2m-1}\rightarrow SU(n)\) represents the generator of \(\pi _{2\,m-1}(SU(n))\cong \mathbb {Z}\) and \(l_i\) for \(i=1, 2\), be the adjoint of the composition
where [ev, ev] is the Whitehead product. Let \(j:SU(n) \rightarrow SU(n+1)\) is the canonical inclusion and \(H_1\) be the subgroup of \([X, U(n+1)]\) generated by \(j\circ l_1\) and \(j\circ l_2\). We study the group \(H_1\). First, we have the following proposition.
Proposition 3.4
There are lifts \({\tilde{\xi }}_{i,k}\) of \(j\circ l_i\) for \(i=1, 2\), respectively,
such that \(({\tilde{\xi }}_{i,k})^*(a_{2i+2})=(m-1)!kt^m\otimes \Sigma ^{-1}(\xi _i)^*(x_{2i-2m+3})\), where \(\Sigma \) is the cohomology suspension isomorphism.
Proof
Hamanaka and Kono in [4, 5] showed that there is a lift \(\gamma :\Sigma SU(n+1)\wedge SU(n+1)\rightarrow W_{n+1}\) of [ev, ev] such that \(\gamma ^*(\bar{x}_{2i+3})=\sum \limits _{j+k=i}\Sigma x_{2j+1}\otimes x_{2k+1}\). Let \(\tilde{\gamma }\) be the following composition
We have
where \(u_{2m-1}\) is the generator of \(H^{2m-1}(S^{2m-1})\). Let the map \(S:\Sigma \mathbb {C}P^m\wedge A \longrightarrow \mathbb {C}P^m\wedge \Sigma A \) be the swapping map and the map \(ad:[\Sigma \mathbb {C}P^m\wedge A, W_{n+1}]\longrightarrow [\mathbb {C}P^m\wedge A, \Omega W_{n+1}] \) be the adjunction. We take \({\tilde{\xi }}_{i,k}:\mathbb {C}P^m\wedge A \longrightarrow \Omega W_{n+1}\) to be the adjoint of the following composition
that is \({\tilde{\xi }}_{i,k}:ad (\tilde{\gamma }\circ S)\), then \({\tilde{\xi }}_{i,k}\) is a lift of \(i\circ l_i\), for \(i=1, 2\). We get
thus we have \(({\tilde{\xi }}_{i,k})^*(a_{2i+2})=(m-1)!kt^m\otimes \Sigma ^{-1} (\xi _i)^* (x_{2i-2\,m+3})\). \(\square \)
Now let \({H_1}'\) be the subgroup generated by \({\tilde{\xi }}_{1,k}\) and \({\tilde{\xi }}_{2,k}\). By Lemma 3.1, \(H_1\) is isomorphic to \({H_1}'/(Im (\Omega \pi )_*\cap {H_1}')\). We have
According to the map of \(\lambda \), we have \(\lambda ({\tilde{\xi }}_{1,k})=(({\tilde{\xi }}_{1,k})^*(a_{2n+2}),({\tilde{\xi }}_{1,k})^*(a_{2n+4}))\). Note that \(x_{2n-2\,m+3}=\sigma (c_{n-m+2})\) and \(x_{2n-2\,m+5}=\sigma (c_{n-m+3})\). The calculation of the first component is as follows
and computing the second component is as follows
Therefore \(\lambda ({\tilde{\xi }}_{1,k})=k((m-1)!(n-m+1)!,0,\frac{1}{2}(m-1)!(n-m+2)!)\). Similarly we can show that \(\lambda ({\tilde{\xi }}_{2,k})=k(0,0,(m-1)!(n-m+2)!)\). Therefore \({H_1}'\) is generated by \(\alpha \) and \(\alpha '\), where
Let t be the generator of \(H^2(\mathbb {C}P^m)\), also \(u_{2n-2m+2}\) and \(u_{2n-2m+4}\) are generators of \(H^{2n-2m+2}(A)\) and \(H^{2n-2m+4}(A)\), respectively. We denote an element \(at^mu_{2n-2m+2}+bt^{m-1}u_{2n-2m+4}+ct^m\zeta _{2n-2m+4}\) belong to \(H^{2n+2}(X)\oplus H^{2n+4}(X)\)by (a, b, c). Let \(B=\{ (a, b, c)| a+(m-1)b\equiv 0 \quad \text {mod}\hspace{2 mm} 2 \}\). Recall \((2n+5)\)-skeleton of \(\Omega W_{n+1}\) is \(S^{2n+4}\vee S^{2n+2}\). Let \((a, b, c)\in Im \lambda \), then there exists \(f\in [X,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) such that
We have \(Sq^2(t^{m-1})=(m-1)t^m\), \(Sq^2(u_{2n-2\,m+2})=u_{2n-2\,m+4}\) and \(Sq^2(a_{2n+2})=0\). Now apply \(Sq^2\) to (3.5), we get \(a+(m-1)b\equiv 0 \quad \text {mod}\hspace{2mm} 2\). Thus we have the following lemma.
Lemma 3.5
\(Im \lambda \subseteq \{ (a, b, c)| a+(m-1)b\equiv 0 \quad \text {mod}\hspace{2 mm} 2 \}\). \(\quad \Box \)
In the following, we bring an application.
\(\bullet \quad SU(n)\)-gauge groups over \(\mathbb {C}P^3\) where n is an odd integer and \(n \ge 3\)
In the previous calculations, we now take \(m=3\). First, we need the following lemma.
Lemma 3.6
\(Im \lambda = \{ (a, b, c)| a+2b\equiv 0 \quad \text {mod}\hspace{2 mm} 2 \}\).
Proof
Apply \([\Sigma ^{2n}-, \Omega W_{n+1}]\) to cofibration \(S^3\overset{\eta }{\longrightarrow }S^2\overset{i}{\longrightarrow }\mathbb {C}P^2\overset{q}{\longrightarrow }S^4\) to obtain the exact sequence
where \(\eta \), i and q are Hopf map, inclusion map and the quotient map, respectively, and the maps \(\eta ^*\), \(i^*\) and \(q^*\) are induced maps. We know that \(\pi _{2n+3}(W_{n+1})\cong \mathbb {Z} \{t_1\} \) and also \(\pi _{2n+4}(W_{n+1})\cong \mathbb {Z}_2 \{t_2\}\), where \(t_2:S^{2n+4}\overset{\eta }{\longrightarrow }S^{2n+3}\overset{t_1}{\longrightarrow }W_{n+1} \). Since \(\eta ^*\) sends \(t_1\) to \(t_2\) so \(\eta ^*\) is a surjection map. Thus by exactness we can conclude that \([\Sigma ^{2n}\mathbb {C}P^2,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) has a \(\mathbb {Z}\)-summand with its generator \(t_3\) that the map \(i^*\) sends \(t_3\) to \(2t_1\).
Now, let \(B = \{ (a, b, c)| a+2b\equiv 0 \quad \text {mod}\hspace{2 mm} 2 \}\). By Lemma 3.5, we have \(Im \lambda \subseteq B\). Put \(u= (0, 0, 1), v=(0, 1, 1)\) and \(w=(2, 0, 0)\). For the converse case, we show that u, v and w are in \(Im \lambda \). Consider the following maps
where q and \(q_1\) are quotient maps and \(\mathbb {C}P^3/\mathbb {C}P^1\simeq S^6\vee S^4\). We have \(\lambda (\phi _1)=u, \lambda (\phi _2)=v\) and \(\lambda (\phi _3)=w\), respectively. Thus Im \((\lambda )=B\). \(\square \)
Put \(\beta =\{u,v,w \}\). We know that \(u, v, w \in Im\lambda \) and generators of Im \(\lambda \), therefore \(\beta \) is a basis for Im \(\lambda \). Let \(p=(n+1)n(n-1)\). We have the following theorem.
Theorem 3.7
\([X, U(n+1)]\) is isomorphic to \(\mathbb {Z}_{\frac{1}{4}(n+1)!}\oplus \mathbb {Z}_{\frac{1}{2}(n+2)!}\oplus \mathbb {Z}_{\frac{1}{2}(n+1)!}\).
Proof
By Proposition 3.3, Im \(\lambda \circ (\Omega \pi )_*\) is generated by \(\alpha _{i,j}\), where \(1 \le i \le 3\) and \(1\le j \le 2\). Note that under basis \(\beta \), Im \(\lambda \circ (\Omega \pi )_*\) is generated by \(\alpha _{i,j}\), where
We represent the coordinate of Im \(\lambda \circ (\Omega \pi )_*\) by the following matrix
that is, Im \(\lambda \circ (\Omega \pi )_*\) is generated by the row vectors of matrix M. By using the Smith normal form, there exist invertible \(6\times 6\) and \(3\times 3\)-matrices \(M'\) and \(M''\) such that
where \( M'=\begin{bmatrix} 1 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 \\ -6 &{} 1 &{} 2 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 \\ 2 &{} -1 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 \\ -24 &{} 0 &{} 12 &{} 0 &{} -1 &{} 0 \\ -6 &{} 3 &{} 2 &{} -1 &{} 0 &{} 0 \\ -24 &{} 12 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 2 &{} -1 \end{bmatrix} \) and \( M''=\begin{bmatrix} 0 &{} 3 &{} 0 \\ 1 &{} -(n-1) &{} -1 \\ 0 &{} 0 &{} 3 \end{bmatrix} \). Therefore we can conclude that
\(\square \)
We write |G| for the order of a group G. We will prove the following proposition.
Proposition 3.8
\(|H_1|=\frac{\frac{1}{2}(n+2)(n+1)n}{\left( \frac{1}{2}(n+2)(n+1)n,k\right) }\cdot \frac{\frac{1}{36}p}{\left( \frac{1}{36}p,k\right) }\).
Proof
We know that the subgroup \({H_1}'\) is generated by \(\alpha \) and \(\alpha '\), where
Note that under basis \(\beta \), the subgroup \({H_1}'\) is generated by \(\alpha =k(n-2)!(n-1,0,1)\) and \(\alpha '=k(n-2)!(2(n-1),0,0)\). We represent the coordinate of \({H_1}'\) by the following matrix
that is, \({H_1}'\) is generated by the row vectors of matrix \(M_{{H_1}'}\). The new coordinate of \({H_1}'\)
Let \(r=(n-2)!\), then we have
Put \(\rho = (0, (n-1)kr, kr)\) and \(\rho '= (0, 0, -18 kr)\). Then we have
If \(x\rho +y\rho '\) and \(x'\rho +y'\rho '\) are the same modulo Im \(\lambda \circ (\Omega \pi )_*\) then we have
These conditions are equivalent to
This implies that there are \(\frac{\frac{1}{2}(n+2)(n+1)n}{(\frac{1}{2}(n+2)(n+1)n,k)}\) distinct value of x and \(\frac{\frac{1}{36}p}{(\frac{1}{36}p,k)}\) distinct value of y, so we have
\(\square \)
4 The group \([\mathbb {C}P^m\wedge A, SU(n+1)]\) when \(n-m\) is odd
In this section, we in case that \(n-m\) is an odd integer and \(n \ge 3\) will study the group \([X, U(n+1)]\) and then obtain the order of group [X, U(n)]. Recall the homomorphism \(\lambda \) defined before in case one. To better distinguish the two cases we now relabel the homomorphism as \(\lambda '\). That is, \(\lambda ':[X,\Omega W_{n+1}]\rightarrow H^{2n+2}(X)\oplus H^{2n+4}(X)\) is defined by \(\lambda '(\alpha )=(\alpha ^*(a_{2n+2}), \alpha ^*(a_{2n+4}))\). We have the following lemma.
Lemma 4.1
The map \(\lambda '\) is monic.
Proof
Recall \(A=S^{2n-2\,m+2}\vee S^{2n-2\,m+4}\) and \(X=\mathbb {C}P^m\wedge A\). We show the group \([X, \Omega W_{n+1}]\) is a free abelian group. We have the following isomorphism
Apply \([\Sigma ^{2n-2m+2}-,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) to the cofibration (3.2), we get the following exact sequence
Since \(\Omega W_{n+1}\) is \((2n+1)\)-connected, we obtain that the first term \([\Sigma ^{2n-2m+3}\mathbb {C}P^{m-1},\Omega W_{n+1}]\) and the last term \([\Sigma ^{2n-2m+2}\mathbb {C}P^{m-1},\Omega W_{n+1}]\) are zero. Thus \([\Sigma ^{2n-2m+2}\mathbb {C}P^m,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) is isomorphic to \(\pi _{2n+2}(\Omega W_{n+1})\cong \pi _{2n+3}( W_{n+1})\cong \mathbb {Z}\). We prove that \([\Sigma ^{2n-2m+4}\mathbb {C}P^m,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) is also a free abelian group. For this, again apply \([\Sigma ^{2n-2\,m+4}-,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) to the cofibration (3.2), we get the exact sequence
Apply \([\Sigma ^{2n-2\,m+4}-,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) and \([\Sigma ^{2n-2\,m+5}- ,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) to the cofibration (3.3), we get the following exact sequences
respectively. Consider the exact sequence (4.1). Since \(\Omega W_{n+1}\) is \((2n+1)\)-connected then the first term and the last term are zero, thus \([\Sigma ^{2n-2m+4}\mathbb {C}P^{m-1},\Omega W_{n+1}]\) is isomorphic to \(\pi _{2n+2}(\Omega W_{n+1})\cong \mathbb {Z}\). Now, consider the exact sequence (4.2). We know that when n is even then \(\pi _{2n+3}(\Omega W_{n+1})\) is zero, so the group \([\Sigma ^{2n-2m+5}\mathbb {C}P^{m-1},\Omega W_{n+1}]\) is isomorphic to zero, where by the exact sequence (4.1) we have that the group \([\Sigma ^{2n-2m+5}\mathbb {C}P^{m-2},\Omega W_{n+1}]\) is zero. When n is odd then we prove that the group \([\Sigma ^{2n-2m+5}\mathbb {C}P^{m-1},\Omega W_{n+1}]\) is isomorphic to \(\mathbb {Z}_2\). Since n is odd, \(\Omega W_{n+1}\) has \((2n+5)\)-skeleton equal to \(S^{2n+2}\vee S^{2n+4}\), so any map \(\Sigma ^{2n-2m+5}\mathbb {C}P^{m-1}\rightarrow \Omega W_{n+1}\) factors as
where q is the pinch map to the top cell and l is some map. Taking l to be the class of order 2 show that \([\Sigma ^{2n-2\,m+5}\mathbb {C}P^{m-1},\Omega W_{n+1}]\cong \mathbb {Z}_2\). Thus, in cases where n is even and n is odd, we get the following exact sequences
respectively. We show that the map \(s_1\) is injective. For this, it needs to be shown that the composite
is nontrivial, where \(s'\) is the suspension of the attaching map \(S^{2m-1} \rightarrow \mathbb {C}P^{m-1}\) with cofibre \(\mathbb {C}P^m\), and \(s''\) generates \([\Sigma ^{2n-2m+5}\mathbb {C}P^{m-1},\Omega W_{n+1}]\). Note that by the connectivity of \(\Omega W_{n+1}\), the map \(s''\) factors as the composite
where q is the pinch map to the top cell and \(c'\) is \(S^{2n+3}\overset{\eta }{\longrightarrow }S^{2n+2}\hookrightarrow \Omega W_{n+1}\). On the other hand, the composite \(S^{2n+4}\overset{s'}{\longrightarrow }\Sigma ^{2n-2\,m+5}\mathbb {C}P^{m-1}\overset{q}{\longrightarrow }S^{2n+3}\) is homotopic to \(\eta \) since n is odd. Therefore \(s''\circ s'\) is homotopic to \(S^{2n+4}\overset{\eta ^2}{\longrightarrow }S^{2n+2}\hookrightarrow \Omega W_{n+1}\), which is nontrivial. Thus in both cases, by exactness we obtain \([\Sigma ^{2n-2m+4}\mathbb {C}P^m,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) is a free abelian group isomorphic to \(\mathbb {Z}\oplus \mathbb {Z}\). Therefore we can conclude that the group \([X, \Omega W_{n+1}]\) is a free abelian group that is isomorphic to \(\mathbb {Z}\oplus \mathbb {Z}\oplus \mathbb {Z}\). \(\square \)
Note that \(\tilde{K}^0(X=\mathbb {C}P^m\wedge (S^{2n-2\,m+2}\vee S^{2n-2\,m+4}))\) is a free abelian group generated by \(\theta _{i,j}=\zeta _{n-m+i}\otimes x^j\), where \(1\le i \le 2\) and \(1 \le j \le m\), with the following Chern characters
and also
where
and \(ch_{m-1}(x^2)=C_1 t^{m-1}\). We have the following proposition.
Proposition 4.2
Im \(\lambda '\circ (\Omega \pi )_*\) is generated by \({\alpha '}_{i,j}\), for \(1\le i\le 2\) and \(1\le j\le m\), where
Proof
Similar to the proof of Proposition 3.3, we get
\(\square \)
Let \(H_2\) be the subgroup of \([X, U(n+1)]\) generated by \(j\circ l_1\) and \(j\circ l_2\). By proof of Proposition 3.4, there are lifts \({\tilde{\xi }}_{i,k}\) of \(j\circ l_i\) for \(i= 1, 2\), respectively, such that
Now let \({H_2}'\) be the subgroup generated by \({\tilde{\xi }}_{1,k}\) and \({\tilde{\xi }}_{2,k}\). By Lemma 3.1, we know that the subgroup \(H_2\) is isomorphic to \({H_2}'/(Im (\Omega \pi )_*\cap {H_2}')\). We have
According to the map of \(\lambda '\), we have \(\lambda '({\tilde{\xi }}_{1,k})=(({\tilde{\xi }}_{1,k})^*(a_{2n+2}),({\tilde{\xi }}_{1,k})^*(a_{2n+4}))\). The calculation of the first and second components are as follows
Therefore \(\lambda '({\tilde{\xi }}_{1,k})=k((m-1)!(n-m+1)!,0,0)\). Similarly we can show that
Therefore \({H_2}'\) is generated by \(\alpha \) and \(\alpha '\), where
Let \(B'=\{ (a, b, c)| (m-1)b\equiv c \quad \text {mod}\quad 2 \}\). We know that \((2n+5)\)-skeleton of \(\Omega W_{n+1}\) is \(\Sigma ^{2n}\mathbb {C}P^2\simeq S^{2n+2}\cup e^{2n+4}\). Let \((a, b, c)\in Im \lambda '\), then there exists \(g\in [X,\Omega W_{n+1}]\) such that
Now apply \(Sq^2\) to (4.3). Since \(Sq^2(t^{m-1})=(m-1)t^m\), \(Sq^2(\zeta _{2n-4})=0\) and \(Sq^2(a_{2n+2})=a_{2n+4}\), we get \((m-1)b\equiv c \quad \text {mod}\hspace{2mm} 2\). Thus we have the following lemma.
Lemma 4.3
\(Im \lambda ' \subseteq \{ (a, b, c)| (m-1)b\equiv c \quad \text {mod}\hspace{2 mm} 2 \}\). \(\square \)
In the following, we bring an application.
\(\bullet \quad SU(n)\)-gauge groups over \(\mathbb {C}P^3\) where n is an even integer and \(n \ge 4\)
Now, we take \(m=3\). We need the following lemma.
Lemma 4.4
\(Im \lambda ' = \{ (a, b, c)| 2b\equiv c \quad \text {mod}\hspace{2 mm} 2 \}\).
Proof
Let \(B' = \{ (a, b, c)| 2b\equiv c \quad \text {mod}\hspace{2 mm} 2 \}\). By Lemma 4.3, we have \(Im \lambda '\subseteq B'\). Put \(u'= (1,0, 0), v'=(0, 1, 0)\) and \(w'=(0, 0,2)\). For the converse case, we show that \(u', v'\) and \(w'\) are in Im \(\lambda '\). Consider the following maps
where \(p_1\) and \(p_2\) are pinch maps, \(q_1\) is quotient map and \(\theta '\) is the generator of \(\pi _{2n+5}(W_{n+1})\). We have \(\lambda '(\phi _1)=u', \lambda '(\phi _2)=v'\) and \(\lambda '(\phi _3)=w'\), respectively. Thus \(Im(\lambda ')=B'\). \(\square \)
Put \(\beta '=\{u',v',w' \}\). Since \(u', v', w' \in Im\lambda '\) and generators of Im \(\lambda '\), therefore \(\beta '\) is a basis for Im \(\lambda '\). Recall \(p=(n+1)n(n-1)\). We have the following theorem.
Theorem 4.5
\([X, U(n+1)]\) is isomorphic to \(\mathbb {Z}_{\frac{1}{6}(n+1)!}\oplus \mathbb {Z}_{\frac{1}{2}(n+1)!}\oplus \mathbb {Z}_{\frac{1}{4}(n+2)!}\).
Proof
By Proposition 4.2, Im \(\lambda '\circ (\Omega \pi )_*\) is generated by \({\alpha '}_{i,j}\) for \(1 \le i \le 2\) and \(1\le j \le 3\). Note that under basis \(\beta '\), Im \(\lambda '\circ (\Omega \pi )_*\) is generated by
We represent the coordinate of Im \(\lambda '\circ (\Omega \pi )_*\) by the following matrix
Again, by using the Smith normal form, there exist invertible \(6\times 6\) and \(3\times 3\)-matrices \(N'\) and \(N''\) such that
where \( N'=\begin{bmatrix} 1 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 \\ 0 &{} 1 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 \\ 0 &{} -2 &{} 0 &{} 1 &{} 0 &{} 0 \\ 3 &{} 0 &{} -1 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 \\ 12 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} -1 &{} 0 \\ 0 &{} -24 &{} 0 &{} 12 &{} 0 &{} -1 \end{bmatrix} \) and \( N''=\begin{bmatrix} 1 &{} 0 &{} 0 \\ 0 &{} 1 &{} \frac{-1}{2}(n+2) \\ 0 &{} 0 &{} 3 \end{bmatrix} \). Therefore we can conclude that
\(\square \)
We will prove the following proposition.
Proposition 4.6
\(|H_2|=\frac{\frac{1}{4}(n+2)(n+1)n}{\left( \frac{1}{4}(n+2)(n+1)n,k\right) }\cdot \frac{\frac{1}{36}p}{\left( \frac{1}{36}p,k\right) }\).
Proof
We know that the subgroup \({H_2}'\) is generated by \(\alpha \) and \(\alpha '\), where
Now under basis \(\beta '\), the subgroup \({H_2}'\) is generated by \(\alpha =k(n-2)!(2,0,0)\) and \(\alpha '=k(n-2)!(0,0,n-1)\). We represent the coordinate of \({H_2}'\) by the following matrix
The new coordinate of \({H_2}'\) is as follow
Recall \(r=(n-2)!\). Then we have
Similar to the discussion in the proof of Proposition 3.7, we can conclude
\(\square \)
The two cases are now being treated simultaneously.
Consider the map of \(j_*:[X, SU(n)] \rightarrow [X, U(n+1)]\). We put
Let P be the subgroup of [X, SU(n)] generated by \(l_1\) and \(l_2\). We have the following lemma.
Lemma 4.7
The following hold:
Proof
By definition of P and \(H_1\), we have \(j_*(P )=H_1\). When n is odd then the statement follows from Proposition 3.8 and when n is even then the statement follows from Proposition 4.6. \(\square \)
5 Proof of Theorem 1.1
Apply the functor \([\Sigma A, -]\) to the fibration (2.1) to obtain the following exact sequence
where \([\Sigma A, BSU(n)]\cong \tilde{K}^0(\Sigma A)\cong 0\). By adjunction, we have
The exact sequence becomes
Thus we get \([\Sigma A, B\mathcal {G}_{0,k}(\mathbb {C}P^3)]\cong Coker (\alpha _k)_* \). By definitions of \(\alpha _k\) and P, the image of \((\alpha _k)_*\) is P. Let n be odd. If T is the order of [X, SU(n)] then by exactness we have
Therefore \(|Coker (\alpha _k)_*|=\frac{T}{O_1}\). Now suppose that \(\mathcal {G}_{0,k}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\simeq \mathcal {G}_{0,k'}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\). Then there is an isomorphism of groups \([\Sigma A, B\mathcal {G}_{0,k}(\mathbb {C}P^3)]\cong [\Sigma A, B\mathcal {G}_{0,k'}(\mathbb {C}P^3)]\). Thus \(|Coker (\alpha _k)_*|=|Coker (\alpha _{k'})_*|\). That is, \(\frac{T}{O_1}=\frac{T}{{O_1}'}\), where
Therefore we can conclude that if \(\mathcal {G}_{0,k}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\simeq \mathcal {G}_{0,k'}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\) then
If n is even, similarly we can conclude that if \(\mathcal {G}_{0,k}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\simeq \mathcal {G}_{0,k'}(\mathbb {C}P^3)\) then
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Atiyah, M.F., Bott, R.: The Yang–Mills equations over Riemann surfaces. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 308, 523–615 (1983)
Cutler, T.: The homotopy type of \(U(n)\)-gauge groups over \(S^4\) and \(\mathbb{C} P^2\). Homol. Homotopy Appl. 20(1), 5–36 (2018)
Crabb, M.C., Sutherland, W.A.: Counting homotopy types of gauge groups. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 83, 747–768 (2000)
Gottlieb, D.H.: Applications of bundle map theory. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 171, 23–50 (1972)
Hamanaka, H., Kono, A.: On \([X, U(n)]\) when dim \(X = 2n\). J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 43(2), 333–348 (2003)
Hamanaka, H., Kono, A.: Unstable \(K^1\)-group and homotopy type of certain gauge groups. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Sect. A 136, 149–155 (2006)
Kono, A., Tsukuda, S.: A remark on the homotopy type of certain gauge groups. J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 36, 115–121 (1996)
Mohammadi, S.: The homotopy types of \(Sp(n)\)-gauge groups over \(CP^2\). Homol. Homotopy Appl. 25(1), 219–233 (2023)
Mohammadi, S., Asadi-Golmankhaneh, M.A.: The homotopy types of \(SU(n)\)-gauge groups over \(S^6\). Topol. Appl. 270, 106592 (2020)
So, T.: Homotopy types of \(SU(n)\)-gauge groups over non-spin \(4\)-manifolds. J. Homotopy Relat. Struct. 14, 787–811 (2019)
So, T.: Homotopy types of gauge groups over non-simply-connected closed \(4\)-manifolds. Glasg. Math J. 61(2), 349–371 (2019)
So, T., Theriault, S.D.: The homotopy types of \(Sp(2)\)-gauge groups over closed, simply-connected four-manifolds. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 305, 309–329 (2019)
Theriault, S.D.: The homotopy types of \(SU(3)\)-gauge groups over simply connected \(4\)-manifolds. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 48, 543–563 (2012)
Theriault, S.D.: Odd primary homotopy decompositions of gauge groups. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 10, 535–564 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that I have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mohammadi, S. The homotopy types of SU(n)-gauge groups over \(\mathbb {C}P^3\). Boll Unione Mat Ital (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40574-024-00423-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40574-024-00423-w