Abstract
Purpose of Review
Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) affects a significant subset of depressed patients. It is estimated that about 30 % of patients with major depressive disorder do not respond to standard treatments. For these patients, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) remains the most effective treatment despite being limited by its side effects. Modifications to ECT parameters have suggested that it may be possible to separate the therapeutic effects of convulsive therapy from the production of side effects.
Recent Findings
Magnetic seizure therapy (MST), which uses electromagnetic induction to induce a seizure, is an alternative, experimental convulsive treatment for major depression. Seizures induced by MST are more focal than those produced by ECT, thereby offering greater control over the induced electric field. Most importantly, it offers the potential to provide antidepressant effect without cognitive side effects. Recent findings have further shown the effectiveness of MST and compared cognitive and metabolic side effects to ECT.
Summary
This article reviews the current literature for clinical studies on MST. While initial results are promising, future work is needed to compare MST efficacy with other antidepressant treatments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and increased risk for suicide. Despite the progress made with pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, a significant percentage of patients remain ill [1]. For these patients with treatment-resistant depression, the therapy that has been considered the gold standard, with proven efficacy, is electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) [2–9]. Despite the finding that modifications to ECT parameters such as pulse width, frequency of sessions, and electrode placement have improved the side effect profile of modern ECT treatments, a significant proportion of patients who receive ECT still experience side effects [10]. In most cases, patients undergo multiple other treatments before trying ECT, and ECT is used as a treatment of last resort. Patients who could potentially benefit from ECT decline treatment due to the stigma attached to the procedure and well-documented cognitive side effects. Therefore, there is a need for an alternative therapy that retains the therapeutic efficacy of ECT but offers a better side effect profile.
Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) is being investigated in an effort to find a safe and effective alternative to ECT. MST is the induction of therapeutic seizures under anesthesia by high-dose repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Like ECT, MST requires the induction of anesthesia and must be delivered in a hospital setting. Like ECT, MST induces a seizure, but the seizure induced by MST is different. There is greater control over site and extent of stimulation with MST due to the fact that magnetic fields pass through tissues unimpeded and the induced electric field remains confined to the superficial cortex. This is in contrast to the widespread stimulation of cortical and subcortical regions with ECT due to the high skull impedance which dissipates the ECT current through the scalp and cerebrospinal fluid and limits the control over the induced electric field. The focal stimulation of MST results in the sparing of medial temporal structures, which are implicated in the cognitive side effects of ECT. Focal stimulation may also make it possible to focus the treatment to areas of the brain thought to be associated with antidepressant response such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
Initial reports of MST treatment in humans was published over a decade ago by Lisanby et al., describing a 20-year-old patient with TRD who received four sessions of MST [11]. Over the past decade, studies have investigated the effectiveness, safety, cognitive effects such as reorientation time, acute memory retrieval, and brain glucose metabolism effects of MST. Available evidence suggests that MST does not appear to cause cognitive impairment although response rates have not reached the high rates of response seen with ECT [12••, 13]. Early MST treatment used pulse frequencies of 40 to 50 Hz. MST devices capable of delivering 100 Hz stimulus have been developed, known as high-dose MST (HD-MST), to improve effectiveness by modifying the stimulus parameters [12••]. Given that MST is still the early phase of clinical testing, the purpose of this review is to synthesize the recent updates on the clinical and cognitive effects of MST (see Table 1).
Cognition
Cognitive adverse effects have limited treatment with ECT and contribute to the stigma associated with its use. Memory impairment can be a distressing symptom for patients, sometimes causing patients to withdraw from treatment. MST has been investigated with several small studies showing antidepressant effects and absence of cognitive adverse effects [14, 15••]. Sparing of the hippocampi due to the focal stimulation of MST is hypothesized to explain why MST does not cause the memory disturbances seen after treatment with ECT. Acute memory retrieval was compared in a study with 20 patients with treatment-resistant depression randomly assigned to treatment with either MST or ECT. Patients in the study were asked to recall words memorized before their treatment. Patients in the MST group performed equally well on treatment days as on control days while patients who had been treated with ECT performed significantly worse on treatment days than on control days. The authors concluded that acute memory disturbances commonly associated with ECT were not seen in patients who received MST [16•].
Orientation
In order to further assess the cognitive effects of MST, one can assess the time taken for patients to regain full awareness and orientation after a treatment session. As they emerge from anesthesia, patients are asked their name, date of birth, age, the place where they are, and the day of the week. Time to orientation is the time from the end of the seizure to patients being assessed as oriented to four out of the five items. MST treatment has been associated with a quicker reorientation time than following ECT [12••, 17]. In a randomized trial of 20 patients with treatment-resistant depression, patients were randomized to receive complete courses of either MST or ECT. The study showed that there was a significant difference in reorientation times between the two treatment arms. Patients who were treated with MST were reoriented 6 min 5 s quicker than patients who had received treatment with ECT [14]. This result is in line with the shorter reorientation time with MST initially reported by Kirov et al. Eleven patients with major depressive disorder received MST during one session of a regular course or ECT. Patients in the study described that after MST, they felt less confused than after ECT, they remembered details of events that occurred immediately before their treatment, and they were able to continue conversations after MST that they had begun just prior to their treatment [17]. Shorter orientation time favors patients continuing with therapy, because patients who experience severe post-treatment confusion/delirium are at increased risk of discontinuing treatments early.
Suicidal Ideation
Suicidal ideation is a serious, life-threatening symptom which can accompany major depression. In an investigation to identify a biomarker that may be used to indicate remission following MST, 33 patients with TRD were assessed in an open-label clinical trial of MST treatment [18••]. In the study, cortical inhibition measures were assessed with combined transcranial magnetic electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Cortical inhibition is mediated by GABAergic interneurons which have been implicated in treatment response for depression as well as improvement in suicidal ideation. The study found that measures of cortical inhibition in the frontal cortex correlated with changes in suicidal ideation, and this biomarker has the potential to identify those patients with suicidal ideation who are most likely to benefit from a course of MST.
Response
Antidepressant response of MST has been reported in several studies, with response rates ranging from 40 to 60 % and remission rates ranging from 15 to 30 % [19]. Although MST has been shown to have a safer cognitive profile compared to ECT, its effectiveness compared to ECT remains variable. Stimulation with higher frequency MST, up to 100 Hz—also known as high-dose MST (HD-MST)—has been investigated in an attempt to improve effectiveness. No significant difference in effectiveness of MST and ECT was found in the first comparison study of HD-MST and ECT study [14]. Twenty patients with TRD randomized to HD-MST or ECT were evaluated. Primary outcome was response defined as 50 % reduction of the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). No significant difference was found between treatment groups. A limitation of this study is that the investigators used low-dose right unilateral ECT (RUL-ECT), a lower stimulation dose compared to other studies of ECT. A later study investigating the clinical effect of HD-MST reported 38.5 % clinical response rate, substantially lower than the approximately 70 % response rate that can be seen with ECT [12••].
Metabolic Effects
The influence of MST on regional blood glucose metabolism was investigated in a study with 26 patients with TRD who had received MST. Undergoing [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans, 12 patients showed metabolic increase bilaterally in the frontal cortex and metabolic decrease in the left striatum following the completion of a course of MST. The authors reported that close to 70 % of patients responded to MST though half relapsed within 6 months, similar to the relapse rates seen after ECT treatment [20]. In addition to improvements in depressive symptoms as assessed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), responders were also reported to have lowered anxiety and improved quality of life [15••].
A similar study sought to find the changes of glucose metabolism in brain regions that have traditionally been reported as dysfunctional in depression (limbic-cortical dysregulation model). Although a small sample size of ten patients participated in the study, areas of increased glucose metabolism were seen in the basal ganglia, orbitofrontal cortex, medial frontal cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. They further discovered there was a differential finding between responders to treatment and non-responders specifically in the ventral anterior cingulate. The authors reported that responders showed an overall decrease in brain metabolism in the ventral anterior cingulate combined with an increase in metabolism in the frontal brain regions. They suggested that these differences may indicate improvement in depression due to balance restoration [1].
Conclusion
Treatment-resistant depression is a burdensome mental illness that is associated with impaired social and physical functioning and increased risk of suicide. Although ECT is regarded as the most effective treatment for depression, its use is limited by the cognitive side effects as well as the stigma associated with its use. The findings reported suggest that MST has the potential to be an alternative safe, effective, and tolerable intervention for patients with mood disorders, especially for those who have treatment-resistant depression [21–24]. The favorable side effect profile of MST may enhance adherence to a full course of treatment and allow earlier intervention with convulsive therapy in cases of severe depression. While initial work has been promising, further studies with larger sample sizes and age ranges are needed to optimize the stimulation parameters and assess its effectiveness. Furthermore, investigations of the effectiveness of MST on the treatment of other mental disorders compared to the therapeutic spectrum of ECT as well as other brain disorders such as autism would expand the implications of this particular type of therapy.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Hoy KE et al. Effect of magnetic seizure therapy on regional brain glucose metabolism in major depression. Psychiatry Res. 2013;211:169–75.
Rasmussen KG, Mueller M, Knapp RG, Husain MM, et al. Antidepressant medication treatment failure does not predict lower remission with ECT for major depressive disorder: a report from the consortium for research in electroconvulsive therapy. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;11:1701–6.
Husain MM, Rush AJ, Knapp R, McClintock SM, Kellner CH, et al. Speed of response and remission in major depressive disorder with acute electroconvulsive therapy (ECT): a Consortium for Research in ECT (CORE) report. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;4:485–91.
Trevino K, McClintock SM, Husain MM, et al. Defining treatment-resistant depression: a comprehensive review of the literature. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2014;3:222–32.
Kellner CH, Greenberg RM, Briggs MC, et al. ECT in treatment-resistant depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;12:1238–44.
American Psychiatric Associaton. Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder, 3 third edition. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167(supplement):1.
Lisanby SH. Electroconvulsive therapy for depression. N Engl J Med. 2007;19:1939–45.
Allan C, Kalu UG, Sexton CE, Ebemeier KP. Transcranial stimulation in depression. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;1:10–1. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.111.101188.
Cleare A, Pariante CM, Young AH, Anderson IM, Members of the Consensus Meeting, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: a revision of the 2008 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines. J Psychopharmacol. 2015;5:459–525. doi:10.1177/0269881115581093.
Sackeim HA, Prudic J, Nobler MS, Lisanby SH, et al. Effects of pulse width and electrode placement on the efficacy and cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy. Brain Stimul. 2008;1:71–83. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.03.001.
Lisanby SH, Schalepfer TE, Fisch HU, Sackheim HA. Magnetic seizure therapy of major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:303–5.
Fitzgerald PB, Hoy K, Clintom AM, Downey G, Daskalakis ZJ. Pilot study of the clinical and cognitive effects of high-frequency magnetic seizure therapy in major depressive disorder. Depress Anxiety. 2013;30:129–36. doi:10.1002/da.22005. One of few studies investigating HD-MST and using longer treatment courses than previously reported.
McClintock SM, Tirmizi O, Chansard M, Husain MM. A systematic review of the neurocognitive effects of magnetic seizure therapy. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011;23:413–23. doi:10.3109/09540261.2011.623687.
Kayser S, Bewernick BH, Grubert C, Hadrysiewicz BL, Axmacher N, Schlaepfer TE. Antidepressant effects of magnetic seizure therapy and electroconvulsive therapy in treatment-resistant depression. J Psychiatr Res. 2011;45:569–76. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.09.008.
Kayser S, Bewernick BH, Matusch A, Hurlemann R, Soehle M, Schlaepfer TE. Magnetic seizure therapy in treatment-resistant depression: clinical, neuropsychological and metabolic effects. Psychol Med. 2015;45:1073–92. doi:10.1017/S0033291714002244. An important examination of the safety and tolerability of MST in connection with functional brain activity.
Polster JD, Kayser S, Bewernick BH, Hurlemann R, Schlaepfer TE. Effects of electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy on acute memory retrieval. J ECT. 2015;31(1):13–9. doi:10.1097/YCT.0000000000000130. First study to assess acute memory retrieval following MST compared with ECT.
Kirov G, Ebmeier K, Scott AIF, Atkins M, Carrick L, O’Carroll RE, et al. Quick recovery of orientation after magnetic seizure therapy for major depressive disorder. Br J Psychaitry. 2008;193:152–5. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.044362.
Sun Y, Farzan F, Mulsant BH, Blumberger DM, Daskalaskis ZJ, et al. Indicators for remission of suicidal ideation following magnetic seizure therapy in patients with treatment-resistant depression. JAMA Psychiat. 2016;73:337–45. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.3097. Important examination of a biomarker which may serve as indicator of remission of suicidal ideation following treatment with MST.
Cretaz E, Brunoni AR, Lafer B. Magentic seizure therapy for unipolar and bipolar depression: a systematic review. Neural Plast. 2015;2015:521398. doi:10.1155/2015/521398.
Sackeim HA, Haskett RF, Prudic J, et al. Continuation pharmacotherapy in the prevention of relapse following electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001;285:1299–307.
Lisanby SH. Update on magnetic seizure therapy: a novel form of convulsive therapy. J ECT. 2002;18:182–8.
Peterchev AV, Krystal AD, Rosa MA, Lisanby SH. Individualized low-amplitude seizure therapy: minimizing current for electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40:2076–84. doi:10.1038/npp.2015.122.
McClintock SM, DeWind NK, Husain MM, Lisanby SH, et al. Disruption of component processes of spatial working memory by electroconvulsive shock but not magnetic seizure therapy. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;1:177–87.
Smith GE, Rasmussen Jr KG, Husain MM, Kellner CH, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing the memory effects of continuation electroconvulsive therapy versus continuation pharmacotherapy: results from the Consortium for Research in ECT (CORE) study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;2:185–93.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Katalin Martits-Chalangari and Alexis Milton declare that they have no conflict of interest. Dr. Mustafa M. Husain declares grant support from NIH, NIMH, NIDA, NINDS, NIA, NARSD, Stanley Medical Foundation, Cyberonics, Neuronetics (past), St. Jude Medical (ANS), MagStim (equip only), Brainsway, NeoSync, Alkermes, Assurex, and Avanir. He reports research consulting for Allergen and AtheaDx.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neuromodulation
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martits-Chalangari, K., Milton, A. & Husain, M.M. Magnetic Seizure Therapy: an Evolution of Convulsive Therapy. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep 3, 376–380 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40473-016-0094-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40473-016-0094-1