Abstract
Lipid abnormalities in youth pose place patients at risk for the early development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). A growing body of evidence supports early detection and treatment of dyslipidemia in youth. While lifestyle modifications remain the cornerstone of treatment, there are a growing number of safe and effective lipid-lowering therapies that providers can feel comfortable initiating in their patients with the appropriate patient selection and monitoring.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains the leading cause of death in the United States and worldwide [1,2,3]. While the consequences of ASCVD typically occur in the fifth and sixth decades of life, its antecedents are found in youth. Autopsy reports have demonstrated the development of atherosclerotic fatty streaks in youth, and risk factors for future CVD have been found to track from youth to adulthood [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. While hypertension, diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, and a family history of early ASCVD contribute to an increased risk of ASCVD, the development of atherosclerosis likely requires the introduction of atherogenic apolipoprotein B (apoB) into the vascular endothelium. It is well-established that LDL cholesterol values, a surrogate marker for apoB levels, are associated with CVD [12, 13].
Further, trials have consistently demonstrated that the degree to which low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is lowered correlates with ASCVD event incidence [13,14,15]. Conditions that lead to an increased LDL cholesterol in both adults and youth, such as familial hypercholesterolemia, place patients at an increased risk for ASCVD. Therefore, early intervention to encourage health behavior changes or initiate pharmacotherapy has consistently been shown to reduce the risk of ASCVD associated with these risk factors [14, 16,17,18,19]. In this review, we will discuss the options for treating hypercholesterolemia in youth.
Diet and Physical Activity
Physical Activity
The cornerstone of treatment for patients with hypercholesterolemia is optimizing the patient’s health behaviors [20, 21]. These include a (1) healthy diet, (2) sufficient physical activity, (3) low amounts of sedentary time, (4) avoiding tobacco, (5) maintaining a healthy body mass index, (6) optimizing blood glucose, (7) lowering blood pressure, and (8) obtaining sufficient sleep [22,23,24]. While the efficacy of interventions varies widely, it is generally considered that lifestyle changes can reduce LDL cholesterol levels by about 10% [24]. In addition, consistent epidemiologic evidence suggests an association between a healthy diet and the risk of CVD [25,26,27,28].
For children over five years old, at least one hour per day of moderate-to-vigorous activity is recommended, along with having less than two hours per day of recreational screen time [23]. However, the effect of sufficient physical activity on the LDL cholesterol of children and adolescents is minor. Studies generally demonstrate variable, but positive, effects of increased physical activity on the lipid profile of youth. Several recent meta-analyses have found that increased physical activity results in lower LDL cholesterol, higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and an improved total cholesterol-to-HDL ratio [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Indeed, the effects of physical activity are not uniform but depend on genetics [38] and the intensity and duration of intervention. In general, the most pronounced effects occur in those with higher risk profiles, such as those with obesity, [31, 39, 40] and a more modest impact on the lipid profiles of children without obesity or dyslipidemia [35, 41].
There is more consistent evidence that diet can lead to a positive impact on LDL cholesterol. The Cardiovascular Health Integrated Lifestyle Diet (CHILD-1) supports a diet relatively low in saturated and sugar-sweetened beverages. It emphasizes the intake of fiber (from fruits and vegetables), whole grains, and lean protein [24]. Lower fat diets are not associated with reduced nutritional measures or adverse effects on growth during puberty [42]. For children, low-fat and low-cholesterol diets, like the CHILD diets, have been found to be safe and effective in normalizing serum lipids. In the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC), pre-pubertal boys and girls with elevated LDL cholesterol who did not meet the criteria for medications were randomized into a diet intervention or usual care. The intervention group received counseling that promoted a diet with reduced total fat, saturated fat, polyunsaturated fat, and cholesterol. Although there were only minor differences between the two groups, those considered to be most adherent to the intervention had a clinically significant decline in LDL cholesterol [43]. Similarly, the Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project (STRIP) found that in a cohort of families of newborns who received counseling to reduce fat intake, there was a 3–6% reduction in total cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol without any effect on growth [44, 45].
Recently, guidelines have moved away from recommendations concerning specific nutrients because of the limited evidence for limitations of particular substances (e.g., cholesterol). Instead, recommendations focus on promoting various diet patterns, such as the healthy American diet, the Mediterranean diet, and the vegetarian diet [23, 25, 46]. These diets are rich in vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts, whole grains, and fish, while servings of red meat (fresh or processed), processed foods, and foods and drinks with added sugar are limited.
Initiation of Pharmacotherapy
For patients who either have a genetic predisposition to hypercholesterolemia or who have not been able to reach treatment goals after a 6-month trial of lifestyle changes, there is a growing number of lipid-lowering therapies that can lower LDL cholesterol to unprecedented. Baseline cholesterol panels should be checked at least two weeks apart (but no longer than three months) and averaged for decision purposes in starting pharmacological treatment. For any patient with LDL cholesterol greater than or equal to 190 mg/dL, statin initiation is recommended (Fig. 1). Additional risk factors should be considered for levels ranging from 160 to 190 mg/dL (Table 1). For those with high-risk conditions, such as diabetes mellitus, treatment is often initiated at LDL cholesterol levels above 130 mg/dL. Treatment should be up-titrated as tolerated for target LDL cholesterol < 130 mg/dL for most patients and < 100 mg/dL for patients with high-risk conditions [22, 23].
Statins
Statins are currently the first-line treatment for most patients with hypercholesterolemia. Currently, six statins have been approved by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for use in youth. Except for pravastatin (approved for youth over eight years old and older), they are approved for patients starting at age ten. Statins work by inhibiting mevalonate synthesis by β-hydroxy-β-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase. With decreased intrahepatic cholesterol levels, there is an increase in LDL cholesterol receptor production and clearance of circulating LDL cholesterol [47]. Statins reduce LDL cholesterol by 30–60%, depending on the statin chosen and its dose [48].
McCrindle et al. compared atorvastatin to placebo in patients aged 10–17 after 26 weeks of follow-up. The authors found a 40% reduction in LDL cholesterol, a 3% increase in HDL cholesterol, and a 12% decrease in triglycerides [17]. In a long-term follow-up study, Luirink et al. demonstrated a reduction in cardiovascular events from 26 to 1% and death from CVD from 7% to zero in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia treated with statins as compared to their similarly affected parents after 20 years of follow-up [49].
Statins are generally well-tolerated in youth. However, routine monitoring is still recommended after starting a patient on a statin (Table 2). While statin-related muscle symptoms are commonly reported in adults (10–60% of patients), [50] they are rare in youth [51]. Further, rates of rhabdomyolysis leading to severe renal impairment are very low (< 0.1%) and have not been described in pediatric studies. Creatinine kinase levels are monitored in most studies, though elevation of 10 times the upper limit of normal has been rarely reported. Therefore, while concerns about muscle aches should be investigated, routine creatine kinase levels are unnecessary [52]. It should be noted that genetic polymorphisms in solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1 gene (SLCO1B1) are associated with an increased risk of myalgias [53].
Transaminases have traditionally been obtained when starting patients on a statin and with dose increases. However, transaminases greater than three times the upper limit of normal rarely occur (< 1%) [50], and severe liver damage is rare [54].
Randomized clinical trials of statins, Mendelian randomization studies, [13] and several meta-analyses [55,56,57,58,59] have suggested a small but clinically significant increased risk of diabetes mellitus in those taking a statin. This risk varies based on the statin, its dose, and patient-related factors. For instance, the Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) trial found that the risk was highest in those with a family history of diabetes mellitus or who had evidence of glucose intolerance at baseline [60].
Since cholesterol is a component of testosterone and estrogen, there has been concern about its effect on growth and puberty. However, several trials have demonstrated no effect on these parameters [52]. Clauss et al. found no difference in various sex hormones in adolescent females started on lovastatin [61]. Similarly, in a study in younger children, there was no effect of statins on sex hormones or measures of puberty (e.g., Tanner staging or testicular volume) [19]. In general, statins are not recommended during pregnancy. Although animal models have suggested that statin medications should not be taken during pregnancy, one recent study did not find an association between congenital anomalies and statin use, though this study was observational [62].
Statins also may interact with a number of medications, and it is recommended that providers check for interactions when starting a new medication. Typically, interactions are related to interactions with OATP1B1, an enzyme that transports medications into the cell. Clarithromycin, ritonavir, indinavir, saquinavir, and cyclosporine are dependent on OATP1B1 and can lead to increased statin concentrations when taken concurrently with a statin. In addition, statin concentrations are affected by the P-glycoprotein efflux transporter, cytochrome P450 in enterocytes, and the ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 2 gene, which encodes for Breast Cancer Resistance Protein and is responsible for excreting statins back into the intestinal lumen [53].
Ezetimibe
Ezetimibe inhibits intestinal cholesterol absorption in the intestine by blocking the NPC1L1 transporter [63]. It is often used in conjunction with statins in patients whose statin monotherapy is ineffective or not well-tolerated. Although it has not been studied widely in pediatric populations, ezetimibe 10 mg daily has been shown to reduce LDL cholesterol levels in adults by 15–20% [22, 64,65,66,67] and an additional 20% in patients taking a statin [68]. Higher doses of ezetimibe have not been found to be more potent. The IMPROVE-IT (Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes) compared a combination of simvastatin and ezetimibe to simvastatin alone and showed an additional reduction in LDL cholesterol of 24% compared to statin monotherapy. This difference in LDL cholesterol levels was also present at long-term follow-up one year later [69]. Recent studies demonstrate a significant reduction in LDL cholesterol in adolescents with familial hypercholesterolemia, both with ezetimibe added to statins or as monotherapy [70, 71]. With the publication of IMPROVE-IT, [69] the benefits of LDL cholesterol lowering were demonstrated to occur in patients taking lipid-lowering therapy other than statins. This landmark trial provided the most substantial evidence that it is the amount of LDL cholesterol reduction that is important, rather than some specific mechanism unique to statins.
In patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, ezetimibe is expected to decrease LDL cholesterol by 26–42% [64,65,66,67]. In general, studies have found either little or no change in triglyceride levels or HDL cholesterol using ezetimibe [63]. Significantly, ezetimibe does not block the absorption of triglycerides or fat-soluble vitamins [67, 72, 73]. Ezetimibe should be considered in patients who are intolerant of statins or who fail to reach goal LDL cholesterol levels on a maximally tolerated statin.
Ezetimibe is generally well-tolerated and has standard daily dosing, making it an appealing treatment in patients with hypercholesterolemia [66, 67]. Of the adverse effects reported, the most common reason for discontinuation is gastrointestinal distress [74]. When added to a statin, there is no further increase in liver enzymes, serum creatinine, or myalgias [73, 75]. Further, ezetimibe is not metabolized by the P450 enzyme system and has minimal interactions with other medications [76].
Ezetimibe is also the first-line treatment for patients with sitosterolemia. In sitosterolemia, patients have mutations in ATP-binding cassette (ABC) subfamily G member 5 or member 8 (ABCG5 or ABCG8), which prevents the efficient removal of plant sterols from the body, leading to their accumulation [77]. Ezetimibe blocks the absorption of dietary cholesterol and plant sterols, leading to at least a 20% reduction in sterol levels, although some trials have suggested reductions reaching 50% [78, 79].
Bempedoic Acid
Bempedoic acid is a more recent addition to the armamentarium of lipid-lowering therapy. Like statins, it inhibits cholesterol production but targets a downstream enzyme, adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase. However, it is a prodrug that is activated in the liver, not in muscles, which is expected to reduce the risk of muscle-associated adverse effects [80]. The Bempedoic Acid and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Statin-Intolerant Patients (CLEAR) trial showed that those treated with bempedoic acid had a decrease in LDL cholesterol levels by 18% and fewer reports of myalgias and muscular weakness as compared to placebo in patients who were intolerant of statins [81]. Bempedoic acid should be considered in patients intolerant of statins.
PCSK9 Inhibitors
Proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is an enzyme produced by the liver that is involved in LDL cholesterol receptor degradation. The LDL cholesterol receptor typically is recycled up to 150 times before eventual degradation in the lysosome. By binding to the LDL receptor, PCSK9 “redirects” the LDL cholesterol to the lysosome [82]. Two PCSK9 inhibitor medications are fully humanized monoclonal antibodies against PCSK9 (evolucumab and alirocumab), and one, inclisiran, is a small interfering messenger ribonucleic acid.
FOURIER (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk) demonstrated a reduction of LDL cholesterol levels of 56 mg/dL at one-year follow-up. At two years of follow-up, a significant decrease in cardiovascular death, stroke, and myocardial infarction was found [83]. In ODYSSEY (Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcomes After an Acute Coronary Syndrome During Treatment with Alirocumab), LDL cholesterol was reduced by 48 mg/dL at one year, along with a decrease in cardiovascular death and cardiovascular events at nearly three years of follow-up. Adverse events for both drugs were similar for placebo and study populations, aside from injection site reactions, which were higher in patients receiving the medication in both trials [84]. In one pediatric studies of evolocumab, LDL cholesterol levels decreased by 69 mg/dL at 24 weeks follow-up. In this pediatric trial, there were similar rates of adverse events in both the treatment and placebo groups, and no major adverse effects were observed from evolocumab [85].
Lomitapide and Mipomersen
While the previously mentioned medications improve LDL cholesterol via upregulation of the LDL receptor, lomitapide and mipomersen do not. Lomitapide inhibits the microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) from transferring triglycerides to apoB to produce very low-density lipoproteins (liver) and chylomicrons (enterocytes). This leads to prematurely degrading the apolipoprotein. Clinical trials suggest lomitapide can reduce LDL cholesterol by as much as 50% [86, 87]. While effective in lowering LDL cholesterol, its side effect profile limits its use in clinical practice. Because of its mechanism of action, it should be given at least two hours after a meal for maximum effectiveness and to reduce the incidence and severity of adverse effects. Patients must follow a fat-restricted diet to avoid gastrointestinal adverse effects, which can be difficult in youth. Further, as the apolipoprotein B is not excreted, triglycerides accumulate in the liver, leading to increases in transaminases and eventually non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Drug-drug interactions with lomitapide are common, including with statins [87].
Mipomersen is a single-stranded antisense oligonucleotide that disrupts the production of the apoB-100 lipoprotein. It decreases LDL cholesterol by approximately 60% [88]. Interestingly, it lowers lipoprotein(a) by 23%, which lomitapide does not affect. Studies in youth have shown a more modest decrease in LDL cholesterol, ranging from 26 to 42% [89]. In addition, drug-drug interactions are rarer with mipomersen compared to lomitapide as it is not metabolized by the p450 system [90]. However, adverse effects are common and are associated with poor compliance [89]. The most common side effects include injection site reactions, influenza-like symptoms, and liver toxicity. As with lomitapide, a low-fat diet is recommended in these patients.
Evinacumab
Evinacumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits Angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3) and reduces LDL cholesterol independent of the LDL receptor. Currently, it is FDA-approved in those with homozygous hypercholesterolemia. Evinacumab has been shown to decrease LDL cholesterol by 48% in youth with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia [91]. This reduction is seen even in patients without functioning LDL receptors. The most common adverse effects include sore throat, abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, headache, and nasopharyngitis.
Bile Acid Sequestrants
Bile acid sequestrants (BAS) were one of the first treatments for hypercholesterolemia in youth. BAS interrupt enterohepatic circulation, thereby decreasing the availability of cholesterol available for bile acid synthesis in the liver. Studies suggest that they lower LDL cholesterol by 10–20% and in a similar amount when added to a statin [47, 90, 92]. Further, BAS may be especially beneficial in patients with diabetes mellitus as they may lead to reductions in glycated hemoglobin [93]. Colesevelam is the only FDA-approved bile acid sequestrant currently and has been shown to decrease LDL cholesterol by 6.3 to 12.5%. Unfortunately, the unpalatable solution and frequent gastrointestinal adverse effects limit their clinical use. Symptoms of bloating, abdominal pain, and diarrhea are commonly reported in children and adults [94, 95]. Further, BAS are contraindicated in patients with triglycerides exceeding 300 mg/dL as they raise the triglyceride level [50]. Patients should be aware that they should not be taken within 4 h of several medications because they may inhibit absorption [90].
Nutraceuticals
In addition to the therapies mentioned, supplements and nutraceuticals have been used to treat dyslipidemia. While a full review of the available nutraceuticals with purported benefits is not possible, we will highlight the ones with the most evidence suggesting benefit. For a majority of natural substances, the evidence is too limited to make a conclusion regarding whether a naturally occurring substance is effective at reducing CVD or if it is safe [96].
Red yeast rice extract is used to reduce LDL cholesterol. Its mechanism of action is similar to statins in that it inhibits HMG-CoA reductase. In fact, the extract from red yeast rice, monacolin K, is nearly identical to lovastatin. Depending on the dose, LDL cholesterol is reduced by 15–25% based on the results of meta-analyses. Interestingly, studies in China suggest a moderate reduction in CVD endpoints compared to statins with similar LDL cholesterol lowering [97]. Theoretically, its side effect profile should be similar to statins, but it seems better tolerated than statins in some populations [98]. The primary argument against the recommendation of red yeast rice for LDL cholesterol reduction is that it is not regulated, and there may be more variability in the amount of extract in each “dose” of red yeast rice compared to statins. This can make monitoring the therapeutic response and assessing for adverse effects more difficult. Further, because of its similarity to a statin, there is less reason to think that it would necessarily be safer than the more potent and generally less expensive statins.
Conclusions
The early recognition and treatment of dyslipidemia is necessary for the most effective prevention of ASCVD. Non-pharmacological approaches should be discussed with all patients and should be continued even if medications are needed to reach goal LDL cholesterol levels as they have benefits beyond LDL cholesterol lowering. However, there are a growing number of safe and effective lipid-lowering therapies that providers can feel comfortable initiating in their patients with the appropriate patient selection and monitoring.
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet. 2006;367:1747–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68770-9.
Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Cheng S, Delling FN, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 update: a Report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143:e254–743. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950.
Teo KK, Rafiq T. Cardiovascular Risk factors and Prevention: a perspective from developing countries. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37:733–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2021.02.009.
McGill HC Jr., McMahan CA, Herderick EE, Tracy RE, Malcom GT, Zieske AW, Strong JP. Effects of coronary heart disease risk factors on atherosclerosis of selected regions of the aorta and right coronary artery. PDAY Research Group. Pathobiological determinants of atherosclerosis in Youth. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:836–45. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.20.3.836.
Davis PH, Dawson JD, Riley WA, Lauer RM. Carotid intimal-medial thickness is related to cardiovascular risk factors measured from childhood through middle age: the Muscatine Study. Circulation. 2001;104:2815–9.
Gidding SS, McMahan CA, McGill HC, Colangelo LA, Schreiner PJ, Williams OD, Liu K. Prediction of coronary artery calcium in young adults using the pathobiological determinants of atherosclerosis in Youth (PDAY) risk score: the CARDIA study. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2341–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.21.2341.
Juonala M, Viikari JS, Ronnemaa T, Marniemi J, Jula A, Loo BM, et al. Associations of dyslipidemias from childhood to adulthood with carotid intima-media thickness, elasticity, and brachial flow-mediated dilatation in adulthood: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:1012–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.163329.
Li S, Chen W, Srinivasan SR, Bond MG, Tang R, Urbina EM, Berenson GS. Childhood cardiovascular risk factors and carotid vascular changes in adulthood: the Bogalusa Heart Study. JAMA. 2003;290:2271–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.17.2271.
Mahoney LT, Burns TL, Stanford W, Thompson BH, Witt JD, Rost CA, Lauer RM. Coronary risk factors measured in childhood and young adult life are associated with coronary artery calcification in young adults: the Muscatine Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:277–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(95)00461-0.
McMahan CA, Gidding SS, Viikari JS, Juonala M, Ka ̈ho ̈nen M, Hutri-Ka ̈ho ̈nen N, et al. Association of Pathobiologic determinants of atherosclerosis in youth risk score and 15-year change in risk score with carotid artery intima-media thickness in young adults (from the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study). Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1124–9.
Berenson GS, Srinivasan SR, Bao W, Newman WP 3rd, Tracy RE, Wattigney WA. Association between multiple cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in children and young adults. The Bogalusa Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1650–6. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199806043382302.
Karagiannis AD, Mehta A, Dhindsa DS, Virani SS, Orringer CE, Blumenthal RS, et al. How low is safe? The frontier of very low (<30 mg/dL) LDL cholesterol. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(22):2169–2154. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1080.
LaRosa JC, Pedersen TR, Somaratne R, Wasserman SM. Safety and effect of very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol on cardiovascular events. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:1221–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.12.052.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists C, Mihaylova B, Emberson J, Blackwell L, Keech A, Simes J, Barnes EH, Voysey M, Gray A, Collins R, et al. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. Lancet. 2012;380:581–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60367-5.
Jones PH, Davidson MH, Stein EA, Bays HE, McKenney JM, Miller E, Cain VA, Blasetto JW, Group SS. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR* trial). Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:152–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00530-7.
Juonala M, Viikari JS, Raitakari OT. Main findings from the prospective Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2013;24:64–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0b013e32835a7ed4.
McGill HC Jr, McMahan CA, Herderick EE, Zieske AW, Malcom GT, Tracy RE, et al. Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth (PDAY) Research Group. Obesity accelerates the progression of coronary atherosclerosis in young men. 2002;105:2712–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000018121.67607.ce.
de Jongh S, Lilien MR, op’t Roodt J, Stroes ES, Bakker HD, Kastelein JJ. Early statin therapy restores endothelial function in children with familial hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:2117–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02593-7.
Rodenburg J, Vissers MN, Wiegman A, van Trotsenburg AS, van der Graaf A, de Groot E, Wijburg FA, Kastelein JJ, Hutten BA. Statin treatment in children with familial hypercholesterolemia: the younger, the better. Circulation. 2007;116:664–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.671016.
Hu FB, Willett WC. Optimal diets for prevention of coronary heart disease. JAMA. 2002;288:2569–78. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.20.2569.
Mente A, de Koning L, Shannon HS, Anand SS. A systematic review of the evidence supporting a causal link between dietary factors and coronary heart diseases. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:659–69.
de Ferranti SD, Steinberger J, Ameduri R, Baker A, Gooding H, Kelly AS, Mietus-Snyder M, Mitsnefes MM, Peterson AL, St-Pierre J, et al. Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in High-Risk Pediatric patients: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139:e603–34. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000618.
Expert Panel on Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular, Heart H, Blood L. I. Expert panel on integrated guidelines for cardiovascular health and risk reduction in children and adolescents: summary report. Pediatrics. 2011;128 Suppl 5:S213-256. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2107C.
Lloyd-Jones DM, Allen NB, Anderson CAM, Black T, Brewer LC, Foraker RE, Grandner MA, Lavretsky H, Perak AM, Sharma G, et al. Life’s essential 8: updating and enhancing the American Heart Association’s construct of Cardiovascular Health: a Presidential Advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;146:e18–43. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001078.
Eckel RH, Jakicic JM, Ard JD, de Jesus JM, Houston Miller N, Hubbard VS, Lee IM, Lichtenstein AH, Loria CM, Millen BE, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC Guideline on Lifestyle Management to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2960–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.003.
Grundy SM, Arai H, Barter P, Bersot TP, Betteridge DJ, Carmena R, Cuevas A, Davidson MH, Genest J, Kesäniemi YA. An International Atherosclerosis Society Position paper: global recommendations for the management of dyslipidemia-full report. J Clin Lipidol. 2014;8:29–60.
Jacobson TA, Maki KC, Orringer CE, Jones PH, Kris-Etherton P, Sikand G, La Forge R, Daniels SR, Wilson DP, Morris PB, et al. National Lipid Association Recommendations for patient-centered management of Dyslipidemia: part 2. J Clin Lipidol. 2015;9:S1–e122121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2015.09.002.
Baum SJ, Kris-Etherton PM, Willett WC, Lichtenstein AH, Rudel LL, Maki KC, Whelan J, Ramsden CE, Block RC. Fatty acids in cardiovascular health and disease: a comprehensive update. J Clin Lipidol. 2012;6:216–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2012.04.077.
Cai L, Wu Y, Cheskin LJ, Wilson RF, Wang Y. Effect of childhood obesity prevention programmes on blood lipids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Reviews: Official J Int Association Study Obes. 2014;15:933–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12227.
Cesa CC, Sbruzzi G, Ribeiro RA, Barbiero SM, de Oliveira Petkowicz R, Eibel B, Machado NB, Marques R, Tortato G, dos Santos TJ, et al. Physical activity and cardiovascular risk factors in children: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Prev Med. 2014;69:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.014.
Escalante Y, Saavedra JM, Garcia-Hermoso A, Dominguez AM. Improvement of the lipid profile with exercise in obese children: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2012;54:293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.02.006.
Ho M, Garnett SP, Baur L, Burrows T, Stewart L, Neve M, Collins C. Effectiveness of lifestyle interventions in child obesity: systematic review with meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e1647–1671. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1176.
Andersen LB, Riddoch C, Kriemler S, Hills AP. Physical activity and cardiovascular risk factors in children. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45:871–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090333.
Kraus WE, Houmard JA, Duscha BD, Knetzger KJ, Wharton MB, McCartney JS, Bales CW, Henes S, Samsa GP, Otvos JD, et al. Effects of the amount and intensity of exercise on plasma lipoproteins. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1483–92. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa020194.
Kelley GA, Kelley KS. Aerobic exercise and lipids and lipoproteins in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Atherosclerosis. 2007;191:447–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.04.019.
Stoedefalke K. Effects of exercise training on blood lipids and lipoproteins in children and adolescents. J Sports Sci Med. 2007;6:313–8.
Watts K, Jones TW, Davis EA, Green D. Exercise training in obese children and adolescents: current concepts. Sports Med (Auckland NZ). 2005;35:375–92. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200535050-00002.
Bouchard C, An P, Rice T, Skinner JS, Wilmore JH, Gagnon J, et al. Familial aggregation of V̇O(2max) response to exercise training: results from the HERITAGE Family Study. J Appl Physiol. 1999;87(3):1008–1003
Rowland TW, Martel L, Vanderburgh P, Manos T, Charkoudian N. The influence of short-term aerobic training on blood lipids in healthy 10–12 year old children. Int J Sports Med. 1996;17:487–92. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-972883.
Kang HS, Gutin B, Barbeau P, Owens S, Lemmon CR, Allison J, Litaker MS, Le NA. Physical training improves insulin resistance syndrome markers in obese adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:1920–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200212000-00010.
Tolfrey K, Jones AM, Campbell IG. The effect of aerobic exercise training on the lipid-lipoprotein profile of children and adolescents. Sports medicine (Auckland, NZ). 2000;29:99–112. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200029020-00003.
Obarzanek E, Hunsberger SA, Van Horn L, Hartmuller VV, Barton BA, Stevens VJ, et al. Safety of a fat-reduced diet: the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC). Pediatrics. 1997;100:51–9. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.100.1.51.
Obarzanek E, Kimm SY, Barton BA, Van Horn LL, Kwiterovich PO Jr., Simons-Morton DG, Hunsberger SA, Lasser NL, Robson AM, Franklin FA Jr., et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of a cholesterol-lowering diet in children with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: seven-year results of the dietary intervention study in children (DISC). Pediatrics. 2001;107:256–64. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.2.256.
Simell O, Niinikoski H, Ronnemaa T, Lapinleimu H, Routi T, Lagstrom H, Salo P, Jokinen E, Viikari J. Special Turku coronary risk factor intervention project for babies (STRIP). Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72:S1316–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/72.5.1316s.
Niinikoski H, Pahkala K, Ala-Korpela M, Viikari J, Ronnemaa T, Lagstrom H, Jokinen E, Jula A, Savolainen MJ, Simell O, et al. Effect of repeated dietary counseling on serum lipoproteins from infancy to adulthood. Pediatrics. 2012;129:e704–713. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-1503.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 8th Edition. December 2015. http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/.
Braamskamp MJ, Hutten BA, Wiegman A, Kastelein JJ. Management of hypercholesterolemia in children. Paediatr Drugs. 2014;16:105–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-013-0060-2.
Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease Study G. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1349–57. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199811053391902.
Luirink IK, Wiegman A, Kusters DM, Hof MH, Groothoff JW, de Groot E, Kastelein JJP, Hutten BA. 20-Year follow-up of statins in children with familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1547–56. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1816454.
Saxon DR, Eckel RH. Statin intolerance: a literature review and management strategies. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;59:153–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2016.07.009.
Johnson PK, Mendelson MM, Baker A, Ryan HH, Warren S, Graham D, Griggs SS, Desai NK, Yellen E, Buckley L, et al. Statin-Associated Myopathy in a Pediatric Preventive Cardiology Practice. J Pediatr. 2017;185:94–e9891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.02.047.
Avis HJ, Vissers MN, Stein EA, Wijburg FA, Trip MD, Kastelein JJ, Hutten BA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of statin therapy in children with familial hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:1803–10. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.145151.
Kellick KA. A clinician’s guide to statin drug-drug interactions. J Clin Lipidol. 2014;8(3 Supp):S30-46
Bays H, Cohen DE, Chalasani N, Harrison SA. The National Lipid Association’s Statin Safety Task F. An assessment by the Statin Liver Safety Task Force: 2014 update. J Clin Lipidol. 2014;8:S47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2014.02.011.
Coleman CI, Reinhart K, Kluger J, White CM. The effect of statins on the development of new-onset type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24:1359–62. https://doi.org/10.1185/030079908x292029.
Navarese EP, Buffon A, Andreotti F, Kozinski M, Welton N, Fabiszak T, Caputo S, Grzesk G, Kubica A, Swiatkiewicz I, et al. Meta-analysis of impact of different types and doses of statins on new-onset diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:1123–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.12.037.
Preiss D, Seshasai SR, Welsh P, Murphy SA, Ho JE, Waters DD, DeMicco DA, Barter P, Cannon CP, Sabatine MS, et al. Risk of incident diabetes with intensive-dose compared with moderate-dose statin therapy: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;305:2556–64. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.860.
Sattar N, Preiss D, Murray HM, Welsh P, Buckley BM, de Craen AJ, Seshasai SR, McMurray JJ, Freeman DJ, Jukema JW, et al. Statins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials. Lancet. 2010;375:735–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61965-6.
Thakker D, Nair S, Pagada A, Jamdade V, Malik A. Statin use and the risk of developing diabetes: a network meta-analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25:1131–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4020.
Mora S, Ridker PM. Justification for the Use of statins in primary Prevention: an intervention trial evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER)--can C-reactive protein be used to target statin therapy in primary prevention? Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:A33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.11.014.
Clauss SB, Holmes KW, Hopkins P, Stein E, Cho M, Tate A, Johnson-Levonas AO, Kwiterovich PO. Efficacy and safety of lovastatin therapy in adolescent girls with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Pediatrics. 2005;116:682–8. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-2090.
Ofori B, Rey E, Berard A. Risk of congenital anomalies in pregnant users of statin drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;64:496–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02905.x.
Kusters DM, Caceres M, Coll M, Cuffie C, Gagne C, Jacobson MS, Kwiterovich PO, Lee R, Lowe RS, Massaad R et al. Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe monotherapy in children with heterozygous familial or nonfamilial hypercholesterolemia. J Pediatr. 2015;166:1377–1384 e1371-1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.02.043.
Knopp RH, Gitter H, Truitt T, Bays H, Manion CV, Lipka LJ, LeBeaut AP, Suresh R, Yang B, Veltri EP, et al. Effects of ezetimibe, a new cholesterol absorption inhibitor, on plasma lipids in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:729–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00807-2.
Dujovne CA, Ettinger MP, McNeer JF, Lipka LJ, LeBeaut AP, Suresh R, Yang B, Veltri EP, Ezetimibe Study G. Efficacy and safety of a potent new selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe, in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:1092–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02798-4.
Yeste D, Chacon P, Clemente M, Albisu MA, Gussinye M, Carrascosa A. Ezetimibe as monotherapy in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metabolism: JPEM. 2009;22:487–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpem.2009.22.6.487.
Clauss S, Wai KM, Kavey RE, Kuehl K. Ezetimibe treatment of pediatric patients with hypercholesterolemia. J Pediatr. 2009;154:869–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.12.044.
Feingold KR. Cholesterol lowering drugs [Updated 2024 Feb 12]. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com; 2021.
Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, McCagg A, White JA, Theroux P, Darius H, Lewis BS, Ophuis TO, Jukema JW, et al. Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after Acute Coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2387–97. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1410489.
Gagne C, Gaudet D, Bruckert E, Ezetimibe Study G. Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe coadministered with atorvastatin or simvastatin in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 2002;105:2469–75. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000018744.58460.62.
McCrindle BW, Ose L, Marais AD. Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in children and adolescents with familial hypercholesterolemia or severe hyperlipidemia: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2003;143:74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(03)00186-0.
European Association for, Cardiovascular P, Rehabilitation, Reiner Z, Catapano AL, De Backer G, Graham I, Taskinen MR, Wiklund O, Agewall S, Alegria E, et al. ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1769–818. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr158.
Phan BA, Dayspring TD, Toth PP. Ezetimibe therapy: mechanism of action and clinical update. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012;8:415–27. https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S33664.
Wierzbicki AS, Doherty E, Lumb PJ, Chik G, Crook MA. Efficacy of ezetimibe in patients with statin-resistant and statin-intolerant familial hyperlipidaemias. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005;21:333–8. https://doi.org/10.1185/030079905X28872.
Sweeney ME, Johnson RR. Ezetimibe: an update on the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and recent clinical trials. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2007;3:441–50. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.3.3.441.
Jeu L, Cheng JW. Pharmacology and therapeutics of ezetimibe (SCH 58235), a cholesterol-absorption inhibitor. Clin Ther. 2003;25:2352–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80281-3.
Escola-Gil JC, Quesada H, Julve J, Martin-Campos JM, Cedo L, Blanco-Vaca F. Sitosterolemia: diagnosis, investigation, and management. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014;16:424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-014-0424-2.
Rocha VZ, Tada MT, Chacra APM, Miname MH, Mizuta MH. Update on sitosterolemia and atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2023;25:181–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-023-01092-4.
Othman RA, Myrie SB, Mymin D, Merkens LS, Roullet JB, Steiner RD, Jones PJ. Ezetimibe reduces plant sterol accumulation and favorably increases platelet count in sitosterolemia. J Pediatr. 2015;166:125–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.08.069.
Nissen SE, Lincoff AM, Brennan D, Ray KK, Mason D, Kastelein JJP, Thompson PD, Libby P, Cho L, Plutzky J, et al. Bempedoic Acid and Cardiovascular outcomes in statin-intolerant patients. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:1353–64. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2215024.
Goldberg AC, Leiter LA, Stroes ESG, Baum SJ, Hanselman JC, Bloedon LT, Lalwani ND, Patel PM, Zhao X, Duell PB. Effect of Bempedoic Acid vs Placebo added to maximally tolerated statins on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in patients at High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: the CLEAR Wisdom Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;322:1780–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.16585.
Peterson AS, Fong LG, Young SG. PCSK9 function and physiology. J Lipid Res. 2008;49(6):1156–1152
Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, Kuder JF, Wang H, Liu T, Wasserman SM, et al. Evolocumab and Clinical outcomes in patients with Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1713–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1615664.
Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, Bhatt DL, Bittner VA, Diaz R, Edelberg JM, Goodman SG, Hanotin C, Harrington RA, et al. Alirocumab and Cardiovascular outcomes after Acute Coronary Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2097–107. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1801174.
Santos RD, Ruzza A, Hovingh GK, Wiegman A, Mach F, Kurtz CE, Hamer A, Bridges I, Bartuli A, Bergeron J, et al. Evolocumab in Pediatric heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1317–27. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2019910.
Cuchel M, Bloedon LT, Szapary PO, Kolansky DM, Wolfe ML, Sarkis A, Millar JS, Ikewaki K, Siegelman ES, Gregg RE, et al. Inhibition of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein in familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:148–56. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa061189.
Berberich AJ, Hegele RA. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy Lomitapide for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia Lomitapide for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017;18.
Raal FJ. Pediatric experience with mipomersen as adjunctive therapy for homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2016;10(4):869–860.
Akdim F, Tribble DL, Flaim JD, Yu R, Su J, Geary RS, Baker BF, Fuhr R, Wedel MK, Kastelein JJ. Efficacy of apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibition in subjects with mild-to-moderate hyperlipidaemia. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2650–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr148.
Cartier JL, Goldberg AC. Familial hypercholesterolemia: advances in Recognition and Therapy. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;59:125–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2016.07.006.
Wiegman A, Greber-Platzer S, Ali S, Reijman MD, Brinton EA, Charng MJ, Srinivasan S, Baker-Smith C, Baum S, Brothers JA, et al. Evinacumab for Pediatric patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 2024;149:343–53. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065529.
Davidson MH. A systematic review of bile acid sequestrant therapy in children with familial hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2011;5:76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2011.01.005.
Handelsman Y, Goldberg RB, Garvey WT, Fonseca VA, Rosenstock J, Jones MR, Lai YL, Jin X, Misir S, Nagendran S, et al. Colesevelam hydrochloride to treat hypercholesterolemia and improve glycemia in prediabetes: a randomized, prospective study. Endocr Practice: Official J Am Coll Endocrinol Am Association Clin Endocrinologists. 2010;16:617–28. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP10129.OR.
Sando KR, Knight M. Nonstatin therapies for management of dyslipidemia: a review. Clin Ther. 2015;37:2153–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.09.001.
Ross S, D’Mello M, Anand SS, Eikelboom J, Consortium CAD, Stewart AF, Samani NJ, Roberts R, Pare G. Effect of bile acid sequestrants on the risk of Cardiovascular events: a mendelian randomization analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2015;8:618–27. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.114.000952.
Liperoti R, Vetrano DL, Bernabei R, Onder G. Herbal medications in cardiovascular medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(9)
Lu Z, Kou W, Du B, Wu Y, Zhao S, Brusco OA, Morgan JM, Capuzzi DM, Chinese Coronary Secondary Prevention, Study G, Li S. Effect of Xuezhikang, an extract from red yeast Chinese rice, on coronary events in a Chinese population with previous myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:1689–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.02.056.
Cicero AFG, Fogacci F, Zambon A. Red yeast rice for hypercholesterolemia: JACC focus seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:620–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.056.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The planning of the manuscript was completed by JH. The initial draft of the manuscript was completed by MD. Editing and revisions were completed by JH and MD.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Degen, M.G., Hartz, J. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Lipid Abnormalities in Pediatric Patients. Curr Pediatr Rep 12, 52–61 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40124-024-00323-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40124-024-00323-9