Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the effects of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) on the expression levels of organic cation/carnitine transporter 1 (OCTN1) as well as the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of ergothioneine, an OCTN1 substrate, in rats.
Methods
Rats pretreated with 1,25(OH)2D3 (2.56 nmol/kg/day) for four days were administered ergothioneine (2 mg/kg) intravenously. The expression levels of rat OCTN1 (rOCTN1) in organs were determined using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Ergothioneine levels in plasma, urine, and organs (with and without intravenous injection of exogenous ergothioneine) were determined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Results
1,25(OH)2D3 pretreatment resulted in a significant decrease in rOCTN1 mRNA expression levels in the kidney and brain, a significant increase in basal plasma levels of ergothioneine (from 48 h), and a significant decrease in the tissue-plasma partition coefficient (Kp) in all tissues (except the heart and lungs) and the basal urine levels of ergothioneine. After intravenous administration, the pharmacokinetic profiles of ergothioneine were consistent with the basal levels of endogenous ergothioneine, with an increase in AUC∞ by 85%, a significant decrease in total clearance by 49%, and a decrease in Vss by 32% in 1,25(OH)2D3-treated rats. The Kp value and urinary recovery of ergothioneine also decreased in the 1,25(OH)2D3-treated group.
Conclusion
This study showed the effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 on the expression and function of rOCTN1 by investigating the interaction between 1,25(OH)2D3 and ergothioneine. Dose adjustment and possible changes in bioavailability should be considered before the co-administration of vitamin D or its active forms and OCTN1 substrates.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin that plays a vital role in calcium absorption and bone maturation (Robien et al. 2013; Choi et al. 2020). It participates in cell proliferation/differentiation and the modulation of inflammatory response pathways (Guillot et al. 2010; Wang et al. 2012). Moreover, vitamin D is used in the treatment of several autoimmune diseases (Schoindre et al. 2011). 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3, also known as calcitriol) is the biologically active form of vitamin D, which functions as a ligand of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) (Haussler et al. 1998). After binding to the VDR, it activates the transcriptional regulation of target genes, thereby regulating the expression levels of several transporters, receptors, and metabolic enzymes (Wang et al. 2012). The direct upregulation or downregulation of many genes via VDR activation demonstrates that VDR plays a crucial role in the biological actions of vitamin D (Uitterlinden et al. 2002; Wang et al. 2012).
Vitamin D, or the active form of vitamin D (1,25(OH)2D3), is widely used as a therapeutic drug and/or supplement due to its beneficial effects. Therefore, their interaction with other drugs has received considerable research attention. Vitamin D can interact with statins, such as atorvastatin, lovastatin, and fluvastatin, via the CYP3A4 enzyme (Dobs et al. 1991; Montagnani et al. 1994; Choi et al. 2020). Similarly, rifampin, isoniazid, tacrolimus, and phenobarbital interfere with the vitamin D metabolic processes (Falkiewicz et al. 2006; Nnoaham and Clarke 2008). The combination of thiazides and vitamin D supplementation increases the risk of hypercalcemia, especially in elderly individuals or patients with hyperparathyroidism (Hathcock et al. 2007). Notably, 1,25(OH)2D3 regulates the function and regulation of metabolic enzymes and drug transporters, ultimately affecting the pharmacokinetics of specific substrates for several metabolic enzymes and drug transporters (Choi et al. 2020). For example, 1,25(OH)2D3 administration results in a decrease in rat kidney organic anion transporters (rOAT1/OAT3) expression, leading to a dramatic decrease in renal clearance of cefadroxil and cefdinir (Kim et al. 2014). Our recent study also demonstrated that 1,25(OH)2D3 downregulates the mRNA and protein expression of Cyp2b1 and Cyp2c11 in rats, which consequently alters the metabolic function and systemic pharmacokinetics of bupropion and tolbutamide (substrates of Cyp2b1 and Cyp2c11, respectively) (Doan et al. 2020). In another recent study of our group, 1,25(OH)2D3 regulated the expression of rat organic cation transporters (rOCT) and rat multidrug and toxin extrusion proteins (rMATE), which was evidenced by a decrease in renal and non-renal (metabolic) clearance of procainamide hydrochloride (an organic cation transporter substrate) and a decrease in the renal clearance of the metabolite N-acetyl procainamide (Balla et al. 2021).
Organic cation/carnitine transporter 1 (OCTN1), also called the ergothioneine transporter (Gründemann et al. 2005), is a member of the SLC22 family, which is strongly expressed in the rat liver (Koepsell and Endou 2004; Pangeni et al. 2021). OCTN1 transports zwitterions and organic cations in both directions in the kidney and contributes to their active secretion and reabsorption (Volk 2014; Ivanyuk et al. 2017). A specific endogenous substrate of OCTN1 is ergothioneine, a natural antioxidant compound extracted from mushrooms, fungi, and cyanobacteria (Halliwell et al. 2016; Nakamichi et al. 2016; Ames 2018). Because ergothioneine does not pass freely through the cell membrane, tissues that lack OCTN1 do not accumulate ergothioneine, whereas those with high expression of OCTN1 can take up ergothioneine at high concentration levels and retain it for a long time (Gründemann et al. 2005). OCTN1-mediated transport is involved in the disposition of several clinically essential drugs in the body. For example, it results in neurotoxicity caused by oxaliplatin (Jong et al. 2011). Moreover, co-administration of ergothioneine ameliorated oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in rats by reducing its accumulation via OCTN1 (Nishida et al. 2018). OCTN1 and its transport mechanism have been implicated in many treatments, especially those using OCTN1 substrates as a therapeutic agent (Nakamichi et al. 2012; Yang et al. 2016). However, information on OCTN1 based drug disposition or drug–drug interactions (DDIs) remains limited.
Alterations in the expression levels of drug transporters are pivotal in affecting the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drug substrates (Evers et al. 2018). Various studies have been conducted to evaluate drug transporters, their correlation with DDIs, and adverse drug reactions due to their impact on pharmacodynamic and safety profiles in patients. Considering that 1,25(OH)2D3 and VDR are involved in various therapeutic drugs and OCTN1 has a crucial role in the drug delivery process, investigating the possible involvement of 1,25(OH)2D3 in the regulation of OCTN1 expression is required. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 on rat OCTN1 (rOCTN1) expression levels and ergothioneine pharmacokinetics and biodistribution.
Materials and methods
Materials and reagents
1,25(OH)2D3, l-ergothioneine, cefdinir, and corn oil were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade acetonitrile and formic acid were obtained from Honeywell Burdick and & Jackson (Muskegon, MI, USA) and Sigma-Aldrich, respectively. All other analytical grade reagents were used without further purification.
1,25(OH)2D3 pretreatment in rats
Male Sprague Dawley rats (7–8 weeks old, 220–280 g; Nara Bio Tech., South Korea) were acclimated to laboratory conditions and provided ad libitum access to food and water and maintained under 12-h/12-h light/dark cycles for one week. The treatment of 1,25(OH)2D3 (2.56 nmol/kg/day) was performed as previously reported (Chow et al. 2009, 2010; Maeng et al. 2011; Doan et al. 2020; Balla et al. 2021). Rats were randomly divided into the control and 1,25(OH)2D3-treated groups. The injection vehicle was a mixture of ethanol in filtered corn oil for the control group or a mixture of ethanol solution of 1,25(OH)2D3 in filtered corn oil (equivalent to 2.56 nmol/mL of 1,25(OH)2D3) for the treatment groups. Rats in the two groups were injected intraperitoneally (1 mL/kg) for four consecutive days at the same time every day. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on the fifth day (24 h after the last dose of 1,25(OH)2D3). Rats were weighed daily and monitored throughout the experiment.
Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
The expression levels of rOCTN1in the liver, kidney, spleen, heart, lung, muscle, and brain were determined using RT-qPCR by normalizing its level with the expression of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Control and 1,25(OH)2D3-treated rats were intraperitoneally injected with a mixture of anesthetic and muscle relaxant (Zoletil®, Vibrac, TX, USA, and Rompun®, Bayer, Germany) 24 h after the last dose of 1,25(OH)2D3 pretreatment and then sacrificed for tissue harvesting. The collected tissues were immediately immersed in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C until use. Total RNA was extracted from 100 mg of tissue homogenate using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). A Nanodrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to measure total RNA concentration at 260–280 nm. The first-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg total RNA using a PrimeScript 1st strand cDNA synthesis kit (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) with the following thermal conditions: incubating at 37 °C for 15 min, inactivating enzymes at 85 °C for 5 s, and cooling to 4 °C. The synthesized cDNA was subsequently used for qPCR assays using the SYBR® Premix Ex Taq II kit (Takara Bio) on an Agilent Mx3005 (Agilent, Boblingen, Germany). According to the manufacturer’s procedure and a slight modification to optimize the thermal conditions for target genes, the amplification and detection of reaction mixtures were evaluated using the MxPro-Mx3005 software with the following thermal conditions: 95 °C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, and 56 °C for 30 s, followed by the melting curve. The experiment was carried out using the comparative quantification mode, and the delta-delta method (2−ΔΔCt) for relative mRNA quantification was used to calculate the fold expression (Maeng et al. 2012; Doan et al. 2020; Balla et al. 2021). The qPCR primer pairs used were as follows: rGAPDH forward primer 5′-CGCTGGTGCTGAGTATGTCG-3′; rGAPDH reverse primer 5′-CTGTGGTCATGAGCCCTTCC-3′; rOCTN1 forward primer 5′-AGCATTTGTCCTGGGAACAG-3′; rOCTN1 reverse primer 5′-ACTCAGGGATGAACCACCAG-3′.
Determination of the basal level of endogenous ergothioneine and in vivo pharmacokinetic study
Control and 1,25(OH)2D3-treated rats without ergothioneine administration were used to determine the mean basal level of ergothioneine in the plasma, urine, and tissues during the entire experiment. Blood samples were collected 30 min before 1,25(OH)2D3 administration on four consecutive days and at the same time on the fifth and sixth day. At each sampling time, 0.3 mL of blood was collected from the tail vein and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C to obtain plasma. Urine samples were collected within 24 h from the fifth to the sixth day. Various tissues, including the liver, kidney, spleen, heart, lungs, brain, and muscle were collected on the sixth day. The samples were stored at − 20 °C until analysis.
The pharmacokinetic study of exogenous ergothioneine administration was performed in rats after four consecutive days of pretreatment. Rats were anesthetized with intraperitoneal injections (20 mg/kg) of Zoletil® and Rompun®. The femoral vein and artery were cannulated with polyethylene tubing (Clay Adams, NJ, USA) filled with heparinized saline (20 IU/mL) for drug administration and blood sampling, respectively. An aqueous solution of ergothioneine (2 mg/mL) was administered intravenously to rats of both 1,25(OH)2D3-treated and control groups at a dose of 2 mg/kg (1 mL/kg). Blood samples were collected at 0 (basal endogenous level), 1, 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 240, 360, 480, and 1,440 min after drug administration and equal volumes of 20 IU/mL heparinized normal saline were injected to compensate for fluid loss. The collected blood was immediately centrifuged for 15 min (14,000 rpm, 4 °C), and the obtained plasma was stored at − 20 °C until analysis (Maeng et al. 2019; Doan et al. 2020).
Concurrently, urine was collected for 24 h at three intervals of 0–4, 4–8, and 8–24 h. The urine was then weighed and stored at − 80 °C until analysis (Jin et al. 2014). After the last sampling time point, the rats were immediately euthanized, and several organs (liver, kidney, spleen, heart, lungs, brain, and muscle) were excised. Tissues were rinsed with normal saline to remove surplus blood before weighing and transferred into homogenate collection tubes, which were placed on ice. Tissues were stored at − 80 °C after their wet weights were measured (Maeng et al. 2007; Doan et al. 2020). The pretreatment and sample collection processes for animal experiments are depicted in Fig. 1.
Sample preparation for analysis
Standard working stock solutions of ergothioneine in acetonitrile were prepared by the serial dilution of the master stock solution in distilled water (1 mg/mL). For the internal standard (IS), the master stock of cefdinir in dimethyl sulfoxide (1 mg/mL) was diluted with acetonitrile to obtain a working IS solution (100 ng/mL). All stock and working standard solutions were stored at − 20 °C until use.
Standards for plasma, urine, and tissue samples were prepared by spiking 10 μL of working stock solutions to 90 μL of 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Considering the presence of endogenous ergothioneine in blank plasma, urine, and tissue samples, BSA was used instead of these matrices. BSA has not only similar components with the body fluid matrices but also good repeatability and accuracy for analysis of endogenous compounds (Shen et al. 2018). In our preliminary study, samples prepared with 1% BSA in PBS solution also showed a good linearity, which was better than that from samples prepared with water or PBS. Therefore, this solution was used to prepare the standards and dilute all biological samples (plasma, tissues, and urine) with appropriate dilution factors prior to analysis. The final concentrations of ergothioneine for calibration curve were 2, 5, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 5000, and 10,000 ng/mL. A total of 200 μL of the IS solution was added to each sample, and the mixture was vortexed for 1 min and then centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant (200 µL) was collected for LC–MS/MS analysis (Jin et al. 2014; Kim et al. 2014).
For basal ergothioneine determination, plasma was not diluted, whereas urine was diluted tenfold with 1% BSA. Tissue samples were homogenized in a two-fold volume of PBS and then diluted with 1% BSA (50-fold for liver and kidney; 20-fold for spleen, heart, lungs, and muscle; and tenfold for brain). For the pharmacokinetic study, plasma and urine were diluted 50 and 100 times with 1% BSA, respectively. Tissue samples were homogenized in a two-fold volume of PBS and then diluted with 1% BSA (1,000-fold for the liver and kidney; 500-fold for the spleen; and 100-fold for the lungs, heart, brain, and muscle). A total of 100 µL of the diluted sample (plasma, urine, or tissue) was mixed with 200 µL of the IS solution, followed by vortex mixing and centrifugation (14,000 rpm, 15 min, 4 °C) to collect the supernatant for LC–MS/MS analysis as mentioned above.
Quantitative analysis of ergothioneine
Ergothioneine was quantified using an LC–MS/MS system consisting of an electrospray tandem triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent 6490 QQQ) with an ESI+ Agilent Jet Stream ion source coupled with a 1290 Infinity HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). A Synergi™ 4 μm polar‐RP 80A column (150 × 2.0 mm, 4 μm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) conjugated with a guard column (SecurityGuard™, 4.0 × 3.0 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) was used to separate ergothioneine and IS from the biological matrix. The mobile phase comprised 0.1% formic acid in water (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). Sample separation was conducted using a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min and an 18-min gradient condition (0 min: 5% B, 5–9 min: 35% B, 9.1–18 min: 5% B). The retention time for ergothioneine and cefdinir was 2.5 and 11.0 min, respectively. The injection volume for each sample was 2 µL. Temperatures of the column and the autosampler were 25 and 4 °C, respectively. Mass spectrometry was conducted in the positive mode using an electrospray ionization source. Simultaneously, multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions of m/z 230.2 → 127.1 and m/z 396.2 → 227.1 were applied for ergothioneine and IS, respectively. The Mass Hunter software (version A.06.00, Agilent Technology) was used for data acquisition and processing. The capillary voltage was set to 3000 V, and the gas temperature was maintained at 350 °C. The nitrogen sheath gas pressure for nebulizing the sample was set at 50 psi, and the gas flow was set at 12 L/min.
To quantify ergothioneine levels in pharmacokinetic samples, calibration curves were established by plotting the peak area ratios of ergothioneine to IS versus ergothioneine concentration using weighted (1/x) least-squares linear regression analysis. The method was validated for selectivity and linearity as previously described (Yoon et al. 2020; Nguyen et al. 2021). The results shown in Supplemental Figs. S1 and S2 indicate that the selectivity of the method is adequate for ergothioneine analysis and that the LC–MS/MS response is directly proportional to the concentration of ergothioneine in plasma and tissues. The calibration curves for ergothioneine ranged from 2 to 10,000 ng/mL. All correlation coefficient (R) of the calibration curves were ≥ 0.990, indicating the good linearity of the analysis method. The mean accuracy of individual calibrators was ≤ 15% for each calibration. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ), defined as the lowest concentration that could be determined with precision and accuracy of ± 20%, was 2 ng/mL.
Data analysis
Pharmacokinetic parameters, including total area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞), total body clearance (CL), apparent distribution volume at the steady state (Vss), and mean residence time (MRT) were determined using non-compartmental analysis with WinNonlin® 8.3 (Pharsight Co., Mountain View, CA, USA).
Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05, as determined by using the two-tailed Student’s t-test between unpaired average values for control and treated groups. Results are presented as the means ± standard deviations (SDs).
Results and discussion
The effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment on the pharmacokinetics of several drugs, such as procainamide (substrate of rOCT and rMATE), cefdinir, cefadroxil (substrates of rOAT1 and rOAT3), and buspirone (substrate of CYP3A4), in rats have been reported in the literature (Kim et al. 2014; Jeong et al. 2019; Maeng et al. 2019). OCTN1 is well known for its influential role in the secretion, reabsorption, and tissue distribution of drugs; however, there is limited information on the clinical relevance of this transporter to a specific substrate, ADME, and DDIs (Evans and Fornasini 2003; Koepsell and Endou 2004). With its vital role in the pharmacokinetics of various drugs, alterations in the expression level of OCTN1 might lead to DDIs when its substrates are administered simultaneously with vitamin D analogs (Chakraborti 2011). Therefore, it is worth investigating the effect of 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment on the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of ergothioneine, a well-known OCTN1 substrate.
Effect of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on rOCTN1 mRNA expression levels in representative organs
Alterations in the mRNA expression levels of several transporters, such as rMDR1, rOAT1, rOAT3, rOCT2, and rMATE, by 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment have been reported in vivo in previous studies (Chow et al. 2009, 2010; Kim et al. 2014, 2020; Jeong et al. 2019). In the present study, the qPCR results (Fig. 2) revealed a significant decrease in the mRNA expression level of kidney and brain rOCTN1 in 1,25(OH)2D3-treated rats (by 77% and 27% compared to those in the control rats, respectively), indicating that treatment with 1,25(OH)2D3 led to the downregulation of rOCTN1 expression. Although a decreasing trend was observed in the mRNA levels of rOCTN1, there were no significant changes in other tissues, such as the liver, spleen, and heart, likely due to the large variation. In addition, our RT-qPCR data were in agreement with previous reports in which OCTN1 was shown to be more strongly expressed in the kidney and brain than in other organs in rat (Slitt et al. 2002) and human (Cheah and Halliwell 2012).
Effects of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on the basal level of endogenous ergothioneine in plasma, urine, and tissues
The ergothioneine basal level in plasma, which served as the endogenous level (Fig. 3a), was similar in control and 1,25(OH)2D3-treated rats on the first and the second days. However, the level of endogenous ergothioneine in the 1,25(OH)2D3-treated group significantly increased from the third day to the sixth day of pretreatment, indicating that 1,25(OH)2D3 exerted an apparent effect on the downregulation of rOCTN1 expression approximately 48 h after the first injection. In addition, the cumulative amount of ergothioneine excreted in urine for 24 h in the 1,25(OH)2D3-treated group was 1880 ng, approximately twofold lower than that in the control group (3858 ng) (Fig. 3b). The significantly decreased amount of ergothioneine excreted in the urine of the treated rats could be likely due to the reduction in active secretion by rOCTN1 in the kidney. In addition, the amount of ergothioneine recovered in urine was much lower than the amount of ergothioneine accumulated in all tissues. Previous studies have reported that the excretion of ergothioneine occurs at a very slow rate under normal conditions (Tang et al. 2018; Pochini et al. 2019).
All tissues from the two groups contained the highest amounts of endogenous ergothioneine in the liver, followed by the kidney, spleen, heart, lung, muscle, and brain (Fig. 4). After pretreatment with 1,25(OH)2D3, the tissue-plasma partition coefficient (Kp) of basal endogenous ergothioneine significantly decreased by 52.4, 66.2, 64.2, 44.3, and 46.7% in the liver, kidneys, spleen, brain, and muscle, respectively (Table 1). The highest Kp value in the liver was in agreement with the strong expression of rOCTN1 in the rat liver (Koepsell and Endou 2004).
In the kidney, rOCTN1 is only located on the apical side of the proximal tubule cell and acts as a bifunctional transporter for both active secretion and reabsorption of ergothioneine (Koepsell and Endou 2004; Tang et al. 2018). When rOCTN1 expression is downregulated by 1,25(OH)2D3, the ergothioneine amount in the urine may affect the ergothioneine level in the kidneys via both active secretion and reabsorption. It is hypothesized that the decreased Kp in the kidneys of the 1,25(OH)2D3-treated rats is likely due to the increased plasma level of ergothioneine and decreased reabsorption of ergothioneine from the urine. However, considering that the observed urinary recovery of ergothioneine was relatively low, other mechanisms or influx transporters may be involved. However, the transporter that plays a role in ergothioneine accumulation in the kidney remains unidentified (Pochini et al. 2019), which is required further study.
In other tissues, rOCTN1 is located in the basolateral, but not the apical membrane, playing the role of influx transport for ergothioneine from the blood to the tissue. The reduction in rOCTN1 expression and/or activity in the 1,25(OH)2D3-treated group may have decreased the accumulation of ergothioneine in these tissues (Pochini et al. 2019). Interestingly, rOCTN1 is absent in the blood–brain barrier (BBB) but is strongly expressed in the brain and plays an important role in protecting neuronal cells from oxidative stress by scavenging free radicals (Nakamichi et al. 2016; Nishida et al. 2018; Tang et al. 2018; Pochini et al. 2019). Therefore, ergothioneine may cross the BBB and accumulate in brain tissue via other transporters. Based on the information in the literature, the vital transporter could be OCTN2, which was reported to be expressed in the BBB and transport ergothioneine, even with low affinity (Ingoglia et al. 2016). The reduction of ergothioneine accumulation in the brain of 1,25(OH)2D3-treated rats could be attributed to the lower function of rOCTN1 in the brain and/or the obstacle to carrying ergothioneine through the BBB by rOCTN2. The cooperation of rOCTN1 and rOCTN2 may play a crucial role in the transport and interaction of many drugs targeting the brain. The effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 on rOCTN2 should be investigated in future studies.
Effects of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on the pharmacokinetic profiles, tissue distribution, and urinary excretion of ergothioneine
To the best of our knowledge, the intravenous pharmacokinetic profile of ergothioneine has not yet been reported in the literature. In this study, we investigated the pharmacokinetic profile of an intravenous bolus of exogenous ergothioneine in cases of emergency ergothioneine requirements. The plasma concentration–time profiles of ergothioneine after intravenous administration of 2 mg/kg to the control and 1,25(OH)2D3-treated rats (Fig. 5a) revealed significantly higher ergothioneine plasma levels in the 1,25(OH)2D3-treated group than in the control group. The calculated pharmacokinetic parameters (Table 2) showed that the AUC∞ of ergothioneine increased by 85%, likely due to the significant decrease in the total clearance of the 1,25(OH)2D3-treated group by 49%. Moreover, the Vss of ergothioneine in 1,25(OH)2D3-treated rats was remarkably decreased by approximately 32% compared to that in the control, indicating a lower tissue distribution of ergothioneine due to the decrease in rOCTN1 activity in 1,25(OH)2D3-treated rats. In addition, after pretreatment with 1,25(OH)2D3, the weight gain of 1,25(OH)2D3-treated rats was significantly lower than that of control rats, which is consistent with the results of previous studies (Jeong et al. 2019; Maeng et al. 2019). Loss of appetite is a common symptom of vitamin D intoxication, which can be attributed to a reduction in weight gain in rats treated with 1,25(OH)2D3 (Çağlar and Tuğçe Çağlar 2021).
The effect of 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment on exogenous ergothioneine levels was fairly consistent with that of basal levels, with increased plasma level and decreased tissue distribution of ergothioneine in the treated group. In a previous study, the exogenous ergothioneine levels in OCTN1 knockout (mOCTN1−/−) mice after oral administration decreased in most representative tissues and significantly increased in plasma as compared to those in wild-type mice (Kato et al. 2010). The similar trends in ergothioneine levels in plasma and tissues between mOCTN1−/− mice and 1,25(OH)2D3-treated rats strongly suggest that 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment decreases rOCTN1 activity in vivo.
A significant decline in the urinary recovery of ergothioneine was observed (Fig. 5b). Although rats were administered exogenous ergothioneine, the urinary recovery of ergothioneine within 24 h in both control and 1,25(OH)2D3-treated rats was still negligible (3.89% and 1.08%, respectively). These data were consistent with the urinary recovery of ergothioneine in humans (Cheah et al. 2017) and mice (Kato et al. 2010), which was reported to be relatively low (< 4%) after oral administration.
The tissue concentrations and Kp of ergothioneine in the liver, kidney, spleen, heart, lung, brain, and muscle are shown in Fig. 6a and Table 3, respectively. Ergothioneine was predominantly distributed in the liver and kidneys. There were significant reductions in the tissue distribution of ergothioneine in all tissues of the 1,25(OH)2D3-treated rats. The Kp of ergothioneine in the liver, kidney, spleen, heart, lungs, brain, and muscle of 1,25(OH)2D3-treated rats decreased by 41.8%, 60.1%, 69.0%, 50.8%, 32.7%, 39.4%, and 47.3%, respectively, compared to that of the control rats. In addition, when the Kp of exogenous and endogenous (basal) ergothioneine was compared (Fig. 6b), the kidney showed the greatest fold change (3.13- and 3.70-fold in the control and treated groups, respectively). Similar to our results, a previous study found the highest basal ergothioneine levels in the liver and kidneys of wild-type mice (Tang et al. 2018). The authors also reported an increase in ergothioneine concentrations in all organs, with the greatest fold change in the kidney after oral administration of ergothioneine.
Recently, ergothioneine has been applied for prevention of various diseases (i.e., neurological disorders, cardiovascular disorders, and ocular disorders), concomitant application for cancer therapies, and cosmeceuticals (Borodina et al. 2020; Cheah and Halliwell 2021). However, there have been no reports of symptoms caused by ergothioneine deficiency. Ergothioneine has antioxidant functions in tissues that are highly exposed to reactive oxygen species. Considering that many neurological diseases are caused by oxidative stress, ergothioneine transport mediated by OCTN1 is linked to antioxidant effect (Nakamichi and Kato 2017). Another study determined the possible role of OCTN1–ergothioneine axis and the relationship between alterations in kidney function and ergothioneine intestinal absorption via OCTN1 (Shinozaki et al. 2017). Therefore, our current data contribute additional evidence for the pivotal role of rOCTN1 in the kidney and brain and the potential interaction of rOCTN1 substrates with vitamin D or the active form of vitamin D. Thus, the moderation of vitamin D in the treatment or supplementation should be carefully considered, particularly when OCTN1 substrates (such as oxaliplatin, ipratropium, metformin, gabapentin, etc.) are co-administered.
Recently, with the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), both vitamin D and ergothioneine have been proposed as potential agents for COVID-19 management. Habitual use of vitamin D supplements is related to a lower risk of COVID-19 (Ma et al. 2021). The role of vitamin D in the prevention and potential implications of COVID-19 has also been reported (Ilie et al. 2020; Laird et al. 2020; Razdan et al. 2020; Ghareeb et al. 2021; Walrand 2021). In addition, ergothioneine has been suggested to be beneficial for alleviating symptoms and improving the prognostic outcomes of COVID-19 patients (Cheah and Halliwell 2021). These effects are due to its cytoprotective property as a super antioxidant (especially in the lungs, the primary target tissue of the coronavirus) and its role in inflammation (Laurenza et al. 2008; Repine and Elkins 2012; Stoffels et al. 2017). In this study, we found that the accumulation of ergothioneine in the organs significantly decreased after the treatment of vitamin D active form. Collectively, vitamin D dosage and the addition of ergothioneine should be considered in careful moderation. Further studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of vitamin D and ergothioneine from the perspective of the prevention and treatment of COVID-19.
Conclusion
This is the first study to investigate the interaction between 1,25(OH)2D3 and ergothioneine, a well-known substrate of rOCTN1 transporter, by observing its biodistribution and pharmacokinetics in rats. We found that 1,25(OH)2D3 inhibited the rOCTN1 gene expression and functional activity, leading to increased ergothioneine levels in the blood and decreased ergothioneine accumulation in rat tissues. This research area is gaining increasing attention owing to the widespread combination of vitamin D and various drugs for therapeutic purposes, which requires further human studies when vitamin D and OCTN1-targeted medicines are co-administered.
References
Ames BN (2018) Prolonging healthy aging: longevity vitamins and proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:10836–10844
Balla A, Jeong Y-S, Kim H-J, Lee Y-J, Chung S-J, Chae Y-J, Maeng H-J (2021) Effects of 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on the pharmacokinetics of procainamide and its metabolite N-acetylprocainamide, organic cation transporter substrates, in rats with PBPK modeling approach. Pharmaceutics 13:1133
Borodina I, Kenny LC, Mccarthy CM, Paramasivan K, Pretorius E, Roberts TJ, Van Der Hoek SA, Kell DB (2020) The biology of ergothioneine, an antioxidant nutraceutical. Nutr Res Rev 33:190–217
Çağlar A, Tuğçe Çağlar H (2021) Vitamin D intoxication due to misuse: 5-year experience. Archives De Pediatrie: Organe Officiel De La Societe Francaise De Pediatrie 28:222–225
Chakraborti CK (2011) Vitamin D as a promising anticancer agent. Indian J Pharmacol 43:113–120
Cheah IK, Halliwell B (2012) Ergothioneine; antioxidant potential, physiological function and role in disease. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 1822:784–793
Cheah IK, Halliwell B (2021) Ergothioneine, recent developments. Redox Biol 42:101868
Cheah IK, Tang RMY, Yew TSZ, Lim KHC, Halliwell B (2017) Administration of pure ergothioneine to healthy human subjects: uptake, metabolism, and effects on biomarkers of oxidative damage and inflammation. Antioxid Redox Signal 26:193–206
Choi MS, Kim YC, Maeng H-J (2020) Therapeutic targets of vitamin D receptor ligands and their pharmacokinetic effects by modulation of transporters and metabolic enzymes. J Pharm Investig 50:1–16
Chow EC, Maeng HJ, Liu S, Khan AA, Groothuis GM, Pang KS (2009) 1alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) triggered vitamin D receptor and farnesoid X receptor-like effects in rat intestine and liver in vivo. Biopharm Drug Dispos 30:457–475
Chow EC, Sun H, Khan AA, Groothuis GM, Pang KS (2010) Effects of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on transporters and enzymes of the rat intestine and kidney in vivo. Biopharm Drug Dispos 31:91–108
Doan TNK, Vo D-K, Kim H, Balla A, Lee Y, Yoon I-S, Maeng H-J (2020) Differential effects of 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on the expressions and functions of hepatic CYP and UGT enzymes and its pharmacokinetic consequences in vivo. Pharmaceutics 12:1129
Dobs AS, Levine MA, Margolis S (1991) Effects of pravastatin, a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, on vitamin D synthesis in man. Metabolism 40:524–528
Evans AM, Fornasini G (2003) Pharmacokinetics of L-carnitine. Clin Pharmacokinet 42:941–967
Evers R, Piquette-Miller M, Polli JW, Russel FG, Sprowl JA, Tohyama K, Ware JA, De Wildt SN, Xie W, Brouwer KL (2018) Disease-associated changes in drug transporters may impact the pharmacokinetics and/or toxicity of drugs: a white paper from the International Transporter Consortium. Clin Pharmacol Ther 104:900–915
Falkiewicz K, Kamińska D, Nahaczewska W, Boratyńska M, Owczarek H, Klinger M, Woźniak M, Patrzałek D, Szyber P (2006) In: Transplantation proceedings. Elsevier, pp 119–122
Ghareeb DA, Saleh SR, Nofal MS, Kaddah MMY, Hassan SF, Seif IK, El-Zahaby SA, Khedr SM, Kenawy MY, Masoud AA, Soudi SA, Sobhy AA, Sery JG, El-Wahab MGA, AaA E, Al-Mahallawi AM, El-Demellawy MA (2021) Potential therapeutic and pharmacological strategies for SARS-CoV2. J Pharm Investig 51:281–296
Gründemann D, Harlfinger S, Golz S, Geerts A, Lazar A, Berkels R, Jung N, Rubbert A, Schömig E (2005) Discovery of the ergothioneine transporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:5256–5261
Guillot X, Semerano L, Saidenberg-Kermanac’h N, Falgarone G, Boissier M-C (2010) Vitamin D and inflammation. Joint Bone Spine 77:552–557
Halliwell B, Cheah IK, Drum CL (2016) Ergothioneine, an adaptive antioxidant for the protection of injured tissues? A hypothesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 470:245–250
Hathcock JN, Shao A, Vieth R, Heaney R (2007) Risk assessment for vitamin D. Am J Clin Nutr 85:6–18
Haussler MR, Whitfield GK, Haussler CA, Hsieh JC, Thompson PD, Selznick SH, Dominguez CE, Jurutka PW (1998) The nuclear vitamin D receptor: biological and molecular regulatory properties revealed. J Bone Miner Res 13:325–349
Ilie PC, Stefanescu S, Smith L (2020) The role of vitamin D in the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 infection and mortality. Aging Clin Exp Res 32:1195–1198
Ingoglia F, Visigalli R, Rotoli BM, Barilli A, Riccardi B, Puccini P, Dall’asta V (2016) Functional activity of L-carnitine transporters in human airway epithelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1858:210–219
Ivanyuk A, Livio F, Biollaz J, Buclin T (2017) Renal drug transporters and drug interactions. Clin Pharmacokinet 56:825–892
Jeong Y-S, Balla A, Chun K-H, Chung S-J, Maeng H-J (2019) Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling for drug-drug interactions of procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide with cimetidine, an inhibitor of rOCT2 and rMATE1, in rats. Pharmaceutics 11:108
Jin H-E, Kim I-B, Kim YC, Cho KH, Maeng H-J (2014) Determination of cefadroxil in rat plasma and urine using LC–MS/MS and its application to pharmacokinetic and urinary excretion studies. J Chromatogr B 947–948:103–110
Jong NN, Nakanishi T, Liu JJ, Tamai I, Mckeage MJ (2011) Oxaliplatin transport mediated by organic cation/carnitine transporters OCTN1 and OCTN2 in overexpressing human embryonic kidney 293 cells and rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 338:537–547
Kato Y, Kubo Y, Iwata D, Kato S, Sudo T, Sugiura T, Kagaya T, Wakayama T, Hirayama A, Sugimoto M, Sugihara K, Kaneko S, Soga T, Asano M, Tomita M, Matsui T, Wada M, Tsuji A (2010) Gene knockout and metabolome analysis of carnitine/organic cation transporter OCTN1. Pharm Res 27:832–840
Kim YC, Kim I-B, Noh C-K, Quach HP, Yoon I-S, Chow EC, Kim M, Jin H-E, Cho KH, Chung S-J (2014) Effects of 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, the natural vitamin D receptor ligand, on the pharmacokinetics of cefdinir and cefadroxil, organic anion transporter substrates, in rat. J Pharm Sci 103:3793–3805
Kim H, Shin JY, Lee YS, Yun SP, Maeng HJ, Lee Y (2020) Brain endothelial p-glycoprotein level is reduced in Parkinson’s disease via a vitamin D receptor-dependent pathway. Int J Mol Sci 21:8538
Koepsell H, Endou H (2004) The SLC22 drug transporter family. Pflugers Arch 447:666–676
Laird E, Rhodes J, Kenny RA (2020) Vitamin D and inflammation: potential implications for severity of Covid-19. Ir Med J 113:81
Laurenza I, Colognato R, Migliore L, Del Prato S, Benzi L (2008) Modulation of palmitic acid-induced cell death by ergothioneine: evidence of an anti-inflammatory action. BioFactors 33:237–247
Ma H, Zhou T, Heianza Y, Qi L (2021) Habitual use of vitamin D supplements and risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection: a prospective study in UK Biobank. Am J Clin Nutr 113:1275–1281
Maeng H-J, Kim M-H, Jin H-E, Shin SM, Tsuruo T, Kim SG, Kim D-D, Shim C-K, Chung S-J (2007) Functional induction of P-glycoprotein in the blood-brain barrier of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats: evidence for the involvement of nuclear factor-κB, a nitrosative stress-sensitive transcription factor, in the regulation. Drug Metab Dispos 35:1996–2005
Maeng HJ, Durk MR, Chow EC, Ghoneim R, Pang KS (2011) 1α, 25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 on intestinal transporter function: studies with the rat everted intestinal sac. Biopharm Drug Dispos 32:112–125
Maeng H-J, Chapy H, Zaman S, Pang KS (2012) Effects of 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on transport and metabolism of adefovir dipivoxil and its metabolites in Caco-2 cells. Eur J Pharm Sci 46:149–166
Maeng HJ, Doan TNK, Yoon IS (2019) Differential regulation of intestinal and hepatic CYP3A by 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3: Effects on in vivo oral absorption and disposition of buspirone in rats. Drug Dev Res 80:333–342
Montagnani M, Lore F, Di Cairano G, Gonnelli S, Ciuoli C, Montagnani A, Gennari C (1994) Effects of pravastatin treatment on vitamin D metabolites. Clin Ther 16:824–829
Nakamichi N, Kato Y (2017) Physiological roles of carnitine/organic cation transporter OCTN1/SLC22A4 in neural cells. Biol Pharm Bull 40:1146–1152
Nakamichi N, Taguchi T, Hosotani H, Wakayama T, Shimizu T, Sugiura T, Iseki S, Kato Y (2012) Functional expression of carnitine/organic cation transporter OCTN1 in mouse brain neurons: possible involvement in neuronal differentiation. Neurochem Int 61:1121–1132
Nakamichi N, Nakayama K, Ishimoto T, Masuo Y, Wakayama T, Sekiguchi H, Sutoh K, Usumi K, Iseki S, Kato Y (2016) Food-derived hydrophilic antioxidant ergothioneine is distributed to the brain and exerts antidepressant effect in mice. Brain Behav 6:e00477
Nguyen T-T-L, Duong V-A, Vo D-K, Jo J, Maeng H-J (2021) Development and validation of a bioanalytical LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of sirolimus in porcine whole blood and lung tissue and pharmacokinetic application with coronary stents. Molecules 26:425
Nishida K, Takeuchi K, Hosoda A, Sugano S, Morisaki E, Ohishi A, Nagasawa K (2018) Ergothioneine ameliorates oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in rats. Life Sci 207:516–524
Nnoaham KE, Clarke A (2008) Low serum vitamin D levels and tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol 37:113–119
Pangeni R, Kang S, Jha SK, Subedi L, Park JW (2021) Intestinal membrane transporter-mediated approaches to improve oral drug delivery. J Pharm Investig 51:137–158
Pochini L, Galluccio M, Scalise M, Console L, Indiveri C (2019) OCTN: a small transporter subfamily with great relevance to human pathophysiology. Drug Discov Diagnos 24:89–110
Razdan K, Singh K, Singh D (2020) Vitamin D levels and COVID-19 susceptibility: is there any correlation? Med Drug Discov 7:100051
Repine JE, Elkins ND (2012) Effect of ergothioneine on acute lung injury and inflammation in cytokine insufflated rats. Prev Med 54(Suppl):S79–S82
Robien K, Oppeneer SJ, Kelly JA, Hamilton-Reeves JM (2013) Drug–vitamin D interactions: a systematic review of the literature. Nutr Clin Pract 28:194–208
Schoindre Y, Terrier B, Kahn J, Saadoun D, Souberbielle J, Benveniste O, Amoura Z, Piette J, Cacoub P, Costedoat-Chalumeau N (2011) Vitamin D and autoimmunity. First part: fundamental aspects. Rev Med Interne 33:80–86
Shen H, Nelson DM, Oliveira RV, Zhang Y, Mcnaney CA, Gu X, Chen W, Su C, Reily MD, Shipkova PA, Gan J, Lai Y, Marathe P, Humphreys WG (2018) Discovery and validation of pyridoxic acid and homovanillic acid as novel endogenous plasma biomarkers of organic anion transporter (OAT) 1 and OAT3 in cynomolgus monkeys. Drug Metab Dispos: Biol Fate Chem 46:178–188
Shinozaki Y, Furuichi K, Toyama T, Kitajima S, Hara A, Iwata Y, Sakai N, Shimizu M, Kaneko S, Isozumi N, Nagamori S, Kanai Y, Sugiura T, Kato Y, Wada T (2017) Impairment of the carnitine/organic cation transporter 1-ergothioneine axis is mediated by intestinal transporter dysfunction in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 92:1356–1369
Slitt AL, Cherrington NJ, Hartley DP, Leazer TM, Klaassen CD (2002) Tissue distribution and renal developmental changes in rat organic cation transporter mRNA levels. Drug Metab Dispos: Biol Fate Chem 30:212–219
Stoffels C, Oumari M, Perrou A, Termath A, Schlundt W, Schmalz HG, Schäfer M, Wewer V, Metzger S, Schömig E, Gründemann D (2017) Ergothioneine stands out from hercynine in the reaction with singlet oxygen: resistance to glutathione and TRIS in the generation of specific products indicates high reactivity. Free Radic Biol Med 113:385–394
Tang RMY, Cheah IK, Yew TSK, Halliwell B (2018) Distribution and accumulation of dietary ergothioneine and its metabolites in mouse tissues. Sci Rep 8:1601
Uitterlinden AG, Fang Y, Bergink AP, Van Meurs JB, Van Leeuwen HP, Pols HA (2002) The role of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms in bone biology. Mol Cell Endocrinol 197:15–21
Volk C (2014) OCTs, OATs, and OCTNs: structure and function of the polyspecific organic ion transporters of the SLC22 family. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Membr Transp Signal 3:1–13
Walrand S (2021) Autumn COVID-19 surge dates in Europe correlated to latitudes, not to temperature-humidity, pointing to vitamin D as contributing factor. Sci Rep 11:1981
Wang Y, Zhu J, Deluca HF (2012) Where is the vitamin D receptor? Arch Biochem Biophys 523:123–133
Yang X, Ma Z, Zhou S, Weng Y, Lei H, Zeng S, Li L, Jiang H (2016) Multiple drug transporters are involved in renal secretion of entecavir. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:6260–6270
Yoon J-H, Nguyen T-T-L, Duong V-A, Chun K-H, Maeng H-J (2020) Determination of KD025 (SLx-2119), a selective ROCK2 inhibitor, in rat plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and its pharmacokinetic application. Molecules 25:1369
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Gachon University Research Fund of 2020 (GCU- 202008420005) and the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (NRF-2021R1F1A1060378).
Conflict of interest
All authors (D.‑K. Vo, T.‑T.‑L. Nguyen, and H.‑.J. Maeng) declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this study.
Research involved in human and animal rights
Animal studies were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Gachon University (date of approval: May 25, 2017; approval number: GIACUC-R2017011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vo, DK., Nguyen, TTL. & Maeng, HJ. Effects of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of ergothioneine, an endogenous organic cation/carnitine transporter 1 substrate, in rats. J. Pharm. Investig. 52, 341–351 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40005-022-00563-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40005-022-00563-1