Abstract
Leaf cuticular wax plays important role in host selection, oviposition, and feeding of phytophagous insects. Thus, the role of cuticular wax of sesame (Sesamum indicum) cultivars (Savitri and Nirmala) in host selection of 3 generalist pests (Spilosoma obliqua Walker, Helicoverpa armigera Hübner, and Spodoptera litura Fabricius) was investigated under laboratory conditions. The GC-MS and GC-FID analyses of leaf surface waxes of both cultivars indicated the presence of 14 n-alkanes from n-C9 to n-C44 and 12 free fatty acids (FFAs) from C9:0 to C20:0. The most predominant n-alkane and FFA of the cultivars were n-C26 (94.3 ± 7.27 μg leaf−1) and C18:1 (110.8 ± 10.07 μg leaf−1), respectively present in Savitri cultivar. The generalists used visual (color and shape), olfactory (odorous n-alkanes and FFAs), tactile (surface ultra-structure), and gustatory (cuticular wax) cues in a synergistic manner for their host selection through attraction (adults and larvae) followed by oviposition (adults) and feeding (larvae) on studied cultivars (Savitri > Nirmala). Their olfactory responses were maximum towards 2 leaf equivalent amount, whereas oviposition and feeding preference were maximum towards 4 leaf equivalent amount of the combined synthetic (4 n-alkanes (n-C16, n-C22, n-C24, n-C26) + 3 FFAs (C12:0, C14:0, C18:1)) mixture-treated intact leaf of cultivar Savitri. This finding can suggest that the synthetic blend (4 n-alkanes + 3 FFAs) in leaf equivalent amount (396.6 ± 4.13 μg leaf−1) or more from cultivar Savitri can be used as lures to develop baited trap. In addition, the cultivar Nirmala can be used as a resistant cultivar in the ecological pest management (EPM) framework of these target pest species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In the new era of chemical ecology, isolation and identification of semiochemicals responsible for insect behavior enhance a better understanding of insect-plant interactions (Schoonhoven et al. 2005; Little et al. 2019). Generally, herbivore insects recognize their host plants by several physicochemical cues through different sensory modalities (Renwick and Chew 1994; Lucas-Barbosa et al. 2016; Roy 2019a). The first physical contact between a defoliator insect and host plant occurs on the leaf cuticular surface and acts as low volatile cues for host acceptance (Jetter and Schäffer 2001, Jetter et al. 2006, Das et al. 2019, Fernández et al. 2019). Thus, leaf surface wax plays important role in short-range attractant for host recognition, oviposition, and feeding stimulant in different phytophagous insects (Li and Ishikawa 2006; Mitra et al. 2017, 2019, 2020). Particularly, it is very crucial in lepidopterans because their neonates are often relatively immobile and, thus, depend on the judicious choice of the host plant by females (Müller and Riederer 2005; McCallum et al. 2011). The preference-performance hypothesis (PPH) or “mother-knows-best” similarly states that natural selection favors those insect females which prefer host plants where the offspring performs best, especially when immature stages are less mobile than adults (Gripenberg et al. 2010; Altesor and González 2018; Birke and Aluja 2018; Griese et al. 2020). Even, for a polyphagous pest, a broader diet increases the risk of oviposition on non-host or poor host along with evaluation time due to limitations in the extraction of information from host volatiles from the noise of non-host volatiles in an ecological context (Lucas-Barbosa et al. 2016).
The leaf surface wax consists of long-chain alkanes, free fatty acids (FFAs), esters, aldehydes, and primary and secondary alcohols, which vary widely within species or cultivars of a species (Jetter et al. 2006; Roy et al. 2012a; Roy and Barik 2012b; Mitra et al. 2020). The importance of plant leaf alkanes and FFAs as allelochemicals has been demonstrated using different insects in the last two decades (Roy and Barik 2014; Roy et al. 2012b; Roy 2019a; Mitra et al. 2020; Mobarak et al. 2020a). Especially, low volatile n-alkanes and FFAs serve an important role in insect-plant interactions like olfactory attractant (Roy et al. 2012a; Roy and Barik 2012b, 2014; Karmakar et al. 2016; Malik et al. 2017; Mobarak et al. 2020a) and or oviposition stimulant (Eigenbrode and Espelie 1995; Parr et al. 1998; Li and Ishikawa 2006; Mitra et al. 2017). Thus, plant surface texture and chemistry are the most important source of information for moths in the evaluation of their potential oviposition sites (Renwick and Chew 1994; Potter et al. 2012; Späthe et al. 2013). There are a handful of studies that investigate attraction to host plant volatiles (Ikeura et al. 2010; Mitra et al. 2019, 2020; Mobarak et al. 2020a) but unequivocal evidence for host physicochemical cues used in orientation and oviposition site selection by lepidopterans has so far been scarce. Even, there is currently no information about physicochemical cues mediated attraction, oviposition, and feeding preference in integration to any insect-plant interactions except the previous report on Diacrisia casignetum Kollar (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) (Roy 2019a). Thus, this behavioral study on other such generalist pests like Spilosoma obliqua Walker (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae), Helicoverpa armigera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and Spodoptera litura Fabricious (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on sesame (Sesamum indicum L., Pedaliaceae) cultivars (Savitri and Nirmala) are immensely important for monitoring these pests along with their management.
These primary generalist (polyphagous) pest species (S. obliqua, H. armigera, and S. litura) are responsible for causing damage to a variety of other economically important crop plants (Xue et al. 2010; Roy and Barik 2012a; Gotyal et al. 2015; Basavaraj et al. 2018; Roy 2020). The most damaging stage of these pest species are their middle to mature age caterpillars (3rd–5th instars) and which feeds gregariously on their host plants (Liu et al. 2004; Xue et al. 2010; Roy and Barik 2013; Mobarak et al. 2020b; Roy 2020, 2021). Even, their larvae showed certain levels of resistance to a different class of insecticides, and hence, successful control of these pests is to some extent difficult (Mohapatra and Gupta 2018; Roy 2019b, 2020). The uses of several botanicals have already attained the status of potential pesticides in place of synthetic insecticides against them (Singh et al. 2007; Kumar and Ali 2010). There is an alternate safe strategy for limiting herbivore by the selection of high-yielding resistant varieties against their pests (Wolfenbarger and Phifer 2000; Mobarak et al. 2020b). Consequently, a comprehensive behavioral study of these pests on most cultivated sesame cultivars (Savitri and Nirmala) is needed to promote integrated pest management (IPM) and to reduce the reliance on chemical pesticides.
In view of the potential for using host-derived semiochemicals in insect pest management, the aims of this study were (i) to identify and quantify the composition of leaf cuticular wax chemicals (n-alkanes and FFAs) present in two widely used cultivars (Savitri and Nirmala) of sesame due to their high yielding potential; (ii) to evaluate the role of respective leaf surface wax chemicals followed by their synthetic analogs and their mixtures (n-alkanes and FFAs) in short-range attraction, oviposition, and feeding of three generalist pests (S. obliqua, H. armigera, and S. litura) through different bioassay experiments under laboratory conditions; and (iii) to find out the most effective combination of wax chemicals (n-alkanes and FFAs) in attraction, oviposition, and feeding of the generalist pests for designing a baited trap as well as more resistant cultivar of sesame as a part of IPM in near future.
Materials and methods
Plants
Two widely used cultivars (Savitri and Nirmala) of sesame (S. indicum) were cultivated in a selected field in West Bengal, India (22°53′N, 88°23′E, 13 m above sea level) during 2019–2020 growing season. Six plots (each plot 10 m × 10 m; soil organic matter 5.3 ± 0.2%, pH 7.7, average relative humidity (RH) 70 ± 15%, average photoperiod 13 L:11 D at 30–36°C) were prepared for the cultivation of the sesame cultivars with an average plant density of 30 ± 2 plants m−2. The selected cultivars were separately germinated and each was grown in three side by side plots with a gap of 0.5 m between two plots. A space of 1 m was kept for the cultivation of another cultivar and all plots were maintained without any insecticide spraying.
Two to three mature leaves were collected from each 6–8 week old plant at 6 AM. Three separate batches of around 100-g leaves of each cultivar were collected from the respective plots for extraction of leaf surface waxes. Only mature leaf surface waxes of sesame cultivars (Savitri and Nirmala) were considered during this study because polyphagous herbivores generally prefer to feed on host mature leaves.
Insects
Adults of three generalist pests (S. obliqua, H. armigera and S. litura) were collected by light trap from jute crops (Corchorus capsularis, cultivar: Sonali (JRC-321), Malvaceae) in West Bengal, India. After collection, the specimens were disposed of on the same jute leaves separately for egg laying in oviposition cages. Newly emerged first instar larvae (F1) of each pest species were placed separately on the same jute leaves for feeding and they were kept at 27 ± 1°C, 70 ± 10% RH, and 12 L: 12 D photoperiod with light intensity of 1500 lux in a Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) incubator as in Roy (2019a, 2019b, 2020).
Three generations (F1–F3) of each pest species were completed on jute leaves. The F4 females (1–2 days old) of each species were used for olfactory and oviposition bioassays as well as fourth instar F4 larvae (9–12 days old) were used for attraction and feeding bioassays in laboratory conditions. The larvae (4th instar) and adults (females) of S. obliqua, H. armigera, and S. litura were not reared on the sesame cultivars (Savitri and Nirmala) other than jute based on Hopkins’ host-selection principle (Barron 2001) to avoid any biasness to leaf surface waxes of sesame cultivars during their bioassays.
Extraction of leaf surface wax
Freshly collected mature sesame leaves of about 100 g for each cultivar (fresh weight 1.6 ± 0.11and 1.4 ± 0.08 g leaf−1(mean ± SE) for Savitri and Nirmala, respectively (SM – Table 1)) were dipped in 2 L n-hexane separately for 1 min at room temperature for extraction of their surface wax which yielded straw-colored extracts without a trace of any chlorophyll (Roy et al. 2012a; Mitra et al. 2020). The crude extract was passed through filter paper (Whatman No. 41, Whatman International Ltd., Maidstone, England) and was evaporated at room temperature (27°C) to dryness. The extraction was repeated three times separately for each cultivar and the dry extract (wax) yields were 43.034 ± 0.931 and 38.460 ± 0.466 mg 100 g−1 in cultivars Savitri and Nirmala leaves, respectively (SM – Table 1).
Each crude extract was then dissolved in 40 ml n-hexane and divided into four equal portions (equivalent to 25 g of leaves); the first one was used for identification and quantification of n-alkanes and FFAs, whereas the remaining second, third, and fourth ones after purification were used for attraction, oviposition, and feeding bioassays, respectively. All solvents used were of analytical grade and purchased from E. Merck (E. Merck Ltd., Mumbai, Maharashtra, India). All standard n-alkanes and fatty acids (FAs) (> 99% purity) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich, Tanfkirchen, Germany).
Analysis of n-alkanes
One-half of the first portion of each crude extract of each kind of sesame leaves (cultivars Savitri and Nirmala) was passed through a column of aluminum oxide (F-20 grade, Alcoa, Frankfurt, Germany) and eluted with petroleum ether. The eluent was fractioned by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on silica gel G (Sigma St. Louis, MO, USA) of 0.5-mm thickness by using carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) as the mobile phase. A faint yellowish band was appeared on the TLC plate, and the plate was air-dried under laboratory conditions. The Rf (retention factor) value (0.86) was compared with the Rf value of a mixture of synthetic n-alkanes between n-C10 and n-C40. The single hydrocarbon band produced in each TLC plate was eluted from the silica gel layer with chloroform, which showed only C-H stress in IR spectroscopy (JASCO FT-IR spectrophotometer).
The purified alkane samples were used for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and GC-FID (flame ionization detector) for identification and quantification, respectively as described by Roy (2019a). The extracts were analyzed with a Shimadzu GCMS-QP5050A to produce electron ionization (EI) mass spectra using HP-5MS column for GCMS-EI analysis by using a specified oven temperature program (initially 80°C held for 2 min, then raised at 15°C min−1 to 320°C, and finally held for 15 min) as described by Roy (2019a). The areas of each peak were converted into quantities of n-alkanes based on GC peak area of internal standard heneicosane (n-C21 at 100 ng μl−1).
Analysis of FFAs
The remaining half of the first portion of each crude extract of sesame leaves (Savitri and Nirmala) was mixed with diethyl ether and filtered through Whatman No. 41 filter paper. The extract was purified by TLC on silica gel G of 0.5-mm thickness by using n-butanol:acetic acid:water (4:1:5, v/v/v) as the mobile phase after discarding water. The band (Rf value of 0.69) was eluted from the silica gel layer with diethyl ether to get purified FFAs. Then, the purified FFAs were esterified with 3 ml BF3-methanol followed by warming for 5 min in a hot water bath at 50–60°C and cooled. Hexane (40 ml) was added to this mixture followed by washing with saturated NaCl twice in a separating funnel. The aqueous layer of each sample was discarded and the hexane fraction was passed through 40 g anhydrous Na2SO4.
One portion of each esterified sample was used for GC-MS and another for GC-FID. The extraction of FFAs from each crude extract was separately repeated thrice followed by esterification as described by Roy (2019a). The extracts were analyzed with a Shimadzu GCMS-QP5050A to produce electron ionization (EI) mass spectra using HP-5MS column for GCMS-EI analysis by using a specified oven temperature program (initially held at 120°C for 2 min, then raised at the rate of 10°C min−1 to 220°C, and finally held at 220°C for 15 min) as described by Roy (2019a). The areas of each peak were converted into quantities of FFAs based on GC peak area of internal standard methyl heneicosanoate (C21:0 at 100 ng μl−1).
Bioassays
Wax chemicals for bioassays
Both natural n-alkanes and FFAs isolated from leaf surface wax of the two cultivars of sesame (Savitri and Nirmala) were prepared in leaf equivalent (μg leaf−1 ml−1) amount dissolving in petroleum ether for different bioassays (olfactory attraction, oviposition, and feeding) of selected generalists (S. obliqua, H. armigera, and S. litura) through different treatments under defined conditions. Petroleum ether was used as the control solvent because both adults and larvae of the generalists were neither attracted nor deterred by it in preliminary bioassays. The synthetic individual n-alkanes, FFAs, and their mixtures mimicking the natural leaf wax (μg leaf−1 ml−1) were prepared by the same procedure as in naturally isolated chemicals. The de-waxed leaves for the bioassays were prepared by using fresh leaves in n-hexane for 1 min as described in the wax extraction process (Roy 2019a).
Insects for bioassays
Newly emerged (1–2 days old) F4 females of S. obliqua, H. armigera, and S. litura were provisioned with water and starved for 12 h prior to use in olfactory attraction, and only 10% sucrose solution was provided as food during oviposition bioassays in different treatments. The newly hatched 4th instar larvae of each species were provisioned with water through moist filter papers and starved for 24 h prior to use for feeding bioassay in different treatments like their adults. Only 4th instar larvae were used in the bioassay experiments because they were most active with a higher consumption rate (CR) among the instars. Larval bioassays were also conducted to confirm the preference performance of adults (females) for their future generations. Always healthy individuals (females and 4th instar larvae) were selected and used once throughout the bioassay experiments with three replications for each pest species.
Adult olfactory bioassays
The behavioral responses of adult females were investigated in a Y-tube olfactometer (20 cm (length) stem and arms, 8 cm (diameter), 60° Y angle) as described by Roy (2019a). The stem of the olfactometer was connected to a porous glass vial ((8.0 cm (diameter) × 20.0 cm (length)) in which test insects were released. Each arm of the olfactometer was connected to a glass micro kit adapter (4.0 cm (diameter) × 6.0 cm (length)) fitted into a glass vial (8.0 cm (diameter) × 8.0 cm (length)). The membrane pump producing an airflow of 450 ml min−1 was first purified by passing through a charcoal filter and the flow of purified air was adjusted to 150 ml min−1 which led into left and right glass vials through the micro kit adapters. All the connections between different parts of the setup consisted of silicon tubes. One milliliter of solvent bearing 1-g leaf equivalent (μg leaf−1 ml−1) amount of identified n-alkanes and FFAs were applied (individually or in the mixture to Whatman No. 41 filter paper pieces (4 cm2) or on the leaf) as volatile cues and another only with solvent (petroleum ether) or de-waxed leaf as control and allowed to evaporate the solvent in open space (1 min) under laboratory condition. These filter papers or leaves in different treatments were introduced into the glass vials attached with the olfactometer. One adult female of each pest (S. obliqua, H. armigera, and S. litura) was introduced into the porous glass vial attached with the olfactometer to measure the attractiveness as described by Roy (2019a).
The behavior of each female was observed for 3 min in the Y-tube because increasing the experimental time did not increase the number of responding insects as in Roy (2019a) and Mobarak et al. (2020a). A decision line was located on each side of the Y-tube and an individual crossing the line within 3 min from release with at least half the body was counted as a response. If no line was crossed after the experimental time had run out, the experiment was treated as no response (NR). To eliminate traces from previous trials, the tube was cleaned with petroleum ether followed by acetone and dried before a new individual was tested (Roy and Barik 2012b, 2014; Roy 2019a). Each experiment with one volatile sample was conducted until a total of 72 (24 × 3) females had used and after testing 12 insects, the olfactometer setup and the position of the two arms were systematically changed (rotated 180°) in order to avoid any positional biases.
Bioassays for cultivar preference by leaf cuticular wax chemicals
The dual-choice tests were performed for olfactory attraction of S. obliqua, H. armigera, and S. litura females to natural alkanes, FFAs, and wax in leaf equivalent (μg leaf−1) amount along with intact leaf and mechanically damaged (50% lost) leaf of selected two sesame cultivars (Savitri and Nirmala). These bioassays were conducted to find the most preferred cultivar for them with three replications in different treatments under defined conditions as follows:
-
Condition 1: Alkane-treated filter paper vs. solvent having 1 treatment with natural n-alkanes present in cultivars Savitri and Nirmala.
-
Condition 2: FFA-treated filter paper vs. solvent having 1 treatment with natural FFAs present in cultivars Savitri and Nirmala.
-
Condition 3: Total wax chemical-treated filter paper vs. solvent having 1 treatment with natural wax present in cultivars Savitri and Nirmala.
-
Condition 4: Normal vs. de-waxed leaf with 2 treatments such as intact leaf, mechanically damaged (50% lost) leaf of cultivars Savitri and Nirmala.
The adult attraction index (AAI, in %) was determined for the 5 treatments under 4 conditions for each pest using the formula [(T − C)/(T + C)] × 100], where T is the number of adults (females) attracted in various treatments (normal leaf or filter paper) and C is the number of adults (females) attracted in controls (de-waxed leaf or solvent) with few modifications based on Singh et al. (2011).
Bioassays for individual synthetic wax chemicals
The same dual-choice tests for the olfactory attraction were conducted for the most common and abundant 10 n-alkanes and 11 FFAs identified from the most preferred cultivar of sesame ( Savitri) individually as their synthetic analogs in leaf equivalent (μg leaf−1) amounts to find the most preferred cues having minimum ≥ 50% attractiveness with three replications in different treatments under defined conditions as follows:
-
Condition 1: Synthetic n-alkane-treated filter paper vs. solvent with 10 n-alkanes present in cultivar Savitri.
-
Condition 2: Synthetic FFA-treated filter paper vs. solvent with 11 FFAs present in cultivar Savitri.
The AAI (%) was determined for the 21 (10 n-alkanes + 11 FFAs) treatments under 2 conditions for each pest as in cultivar preference experiments.
Bioassays for most effective (synthetic and natural) wax chemicals
Similarly, dual-choice tests for olfactory attraction of S. obliqua, H. armigera, and S. litura females to the most preferred cues of selected synthetic n-alkanes (n-C16, n-C22, n-C24, n-C26) and FFAs (C12:0, C14:0, C18:1) were used in the mixture as well as in combination (4 n-alkanes + 3 FFAs) for all the bioassay experiments because they were also produced more attractiveness than their individual cues for the pests. Similar experiments were performed with natural n-alkanes, FFAs, and their mixtures (n-alkanes + FFAs) along with mixtures of most preferred synthetic (4 n-alkanes, 3 FFAs, and 4 n-alkanes + 3 FFAs) mixtures in leaf equivalent (μg leaf−1) amounts of cultivar Savitri. All the bioassays were conducted in the same manner as in synthetic individual compounds with three replications in different treatments under defined conditions as follows:
-
Condition 1: Alkane-treated filter paper vs. solvent with 2 treatments such as the mixture of the most preferred synthetic n-alkanes (n-C16, n-C22, n-C24, n-C26) and natural n-alkanes present in cultivar Savitri.
-
Condition 2: FFA-treated filter paper vs. solvent with 2 treatments such as the mixture of the most preferred synthetic FFAs (C12:0, C14:0, C18:1) and natural FFAs present in cultivar Savitri.
-
Condition 3: Total wax chemical-treated filter paper vs. solvent with 2 treatments such as the mixture of synthetic (4 n-alkanes + 3 FFAs) and natural (n-alkanes + FFAs) wax chemicals present in cultivar Savitri.
-
Condition 4: Normal vs. de-waxed leaf with 2 treatments such as intact leaf, mechanically damaged (50% lost) leaf of cultivar Savitri.
-
Condition 5: Combined synthetic mixture (4 n-alkanes + 3 FFAs)-treated normal vs. de-waxed leaf with 4 treatments such as one, two, three, and four leaf equivalent amount of the combined synthetic mixtures (4 n-alkanes + 3 FFAs) of cultivar Savitri.
The AAI (%) was determined for the 12 treatments under 5 conditions for each pest as in cultivar preference experiments.
Adult oviposition bioassays
Oviposition preference was assessed by using newly emerged 24 pairs of male and female of each pest species (S. obliqua, H. armigera, and S. litura) in a group with 3 groups for each (24 × 3 = 72 pairs) in glass chambers (40 × 40 × 40 cm3) by using the natural and synthetic mixtures as in adult olfactory bioassays. The dual-choice test was conducted for each treatment in the said glass chambers covered with nylon net and the data were collected after 24-h intervals up to 96 h.
For the choice experiments, each leaf or filter paper was marked to create two halves vertically. One half was treated with the test compound and the other half was kept as a control. Each mixture was applied with a micropipette in leaf equivalent (μg leaf−1) amount present in cultivar Savitri, and after evaporating the solvent, one pair of newly emerged moths was released in each glass chamber. Each chamber was provided with 10% sucrose solution as food and then kept in a BOD incubator as in mass culture. The leaf or filter paper of the three replicates having egg masses was detached from the glass chamber and eggs deposited on the surfaces were counted at the black head stage for 12 treatments under 5 conditions for each pest as in adult olfactory attraction bioassays (Table 6).
The oviposition preference index (OPI %) was determined for the 12 treatments under 5 conditions using the formula: OPI (%) = [(I − D)/(I + D)] × 100], where I is the number of eggs laid in various treatments (normal leaf or filter paper) and D is the number of eggs laid in controls (de-waxed leaf or solvent) as in adult olfactory attraction tests (Singh et al. 2011).
Larval olfactory bioassays
The attractiveness of 4th instar larvae of S. obliqua, H. armigera, and S. litura was conducted to investigate the possible pairing between respective larval attraction and adult oviposition preference in the same manner like adult olfactory bioassays in a miniature form of Y-tube olfactometer (12 cm (length) stem and arms, 4 cm (diameter), 60° Y angle according to their body size) as described by Roy (2019a). The dual-choice tests were conducted by using the same natural and synthetic mixtures as in adult olfactory bioassays through 12 different treatments under 5 defined conditions. For each treatment, 72 larvae were tested with three replications for the selected pest species (n = 24 × 3). The behavior of each larva was observed for 3 min in the Y-tube and larval attraction index (LAI, in %) was also calculated as in adult (AAI%) olfactory bioassays.
Larval feeding bioassays
Larval feeding bioassays of S. obliqua, H. armigera, and S. litura were conducted to trace the possible relationship between their larval attraction and feeding preference. Freshly collected mature leaves of the sesame cultivar (Savitri) were tested in 12 different treatments under normal vs. de-waxed leaf conditions. The solvent on the de-waxed leaf was dried at ambient temperature (27 ± 1°C) before the larvae were released onto the leaves. Healthy 4th instar larvae were selected for the experiment and placed separately in Petri dishes (9 cm in diameter) with normal and de-waxed leaves for each treatment. Each treatment was replicated three times for a pest and conducted with 72 (24 × 3) larvae per replication having 24 larvae in each group for each pest species. Leaf desiccation was prevented by using wet filter paper in each Petri dish.
Larvae were allowed to feed for 24 h and the area (cm2) consumed was measured for the 12 different treatments under 5 conditions as in adult olfactory bioassays where all treatments were with normal and de-waxed leaf other than filter paper and solvent (Table 8). Feeding index (FI %) was calculated for the 12 treatments under 5 conditions using the formula: FI (%) = [(F − N)/(F + N)] × 100, where F and N are the average consumption rate in normal and de-waxed leaf, respectively, as in LAI (%) calculation (Singh et al. 2011).
Data analysis
The data on total amounts of n-alkanes and FFAs of two cultivars (Savitri and Nirmala) of sesame were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test. The data obtained on responses of S. obliqua, H. armigera, and S. litura bioassays to surface wax chemicals and their synthetic individuals as well as their mixtures were analyzed by the chi-square (χ2) test based on the null hypothesis whether the ratio of individual choosing the stimulus vs. the control differs significantly from 1:1 (Zar 1999). Insects that did not respond (NR) to any one of the treatments were also included in the analyses. All the statistical analysis was conducted by using SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
Surface wax
A single mature leaf of cultivars Savitri (1.6 ± 0.11 g) and Nirmala (1.4 ± 0.08 g) yielded 691.7 ± 22.12 and 531.0 ± 24.47 μg (mean ± SE, n = 3) of surface wax, respectively. Out of the extracted waxes from a single leaf of Savitri and Nirmala represented 290.2 ± 3.97 and 249.9 ± 6.74 μg n-alkanes and 244.5 ± 13.15 and 190.9 ± 19.02 μg of FFAs, respectively, with the balance consisting of unidentified surface wax compounds (SM-Table 1). Total n-alkanes were significantly different (F1,4 = 26.610, p = 0.007) in the sesame cultivars (Savitri > Nirmala), whereas no significant differences were found in total surface waxes (F1,4 = 5.794, p = 0.074) and FFAs (F1,4 = 3.198, p = 0.148) at their respective leaf equivalent (μg leaf−1) amounts (SM - Table 1).
Alkanes in leaf surface wax
Total 14 different n-alkanes were identified between n-C9 and n-C44 and, out of them, 13 and 11 types of n-alkanes were detected from the leaves of Savitri and Nirmala cultivars, respectively (Table 1). Hexacosane (n-C26) and tetracosane (n-C24) were predominant in Savitri (94.3 ± 7.27μg leaf−1) and Nirmala (44.5 ± 3.62 μg leaf−1), respectively (Table 1). Amounts of all the identified n-alkanes were differed significantly (F1,4 ≥ 14.705, p ≤ 0.019) within the selected cultivars (Savitri > Nirmala) of sesame (Table 1).
FFAs in leaf surface wax
Total 12 different FFAs were identified between C9:0 and C20:0 and, out of them, 11 and 12 types of FFAs were detected from the leaves of Savitri and Nirmala cultivars, respectively (Table 2). Among them, octadecenoic acid (C18:1) and nonanoic acid (C9:0) were predominant in Savitri (110.8 ± 10.07 μg leaf−1) and Nirmala (48.5 ± 4.68 μg leaf−1), respectively (Table 2). All the identified FFAs were differed significantly (F1,4 ≥ 11.166, p ≤ 0.029), except tetradecanoic acid (C14:0) within the selected cultivars (Savitri > Nirmala) of sesame (Table 2).
Adult attractions
Cultivar preference
The highest attraction (%) and adult attraction index (AAI%) value of 86.4 ± 1.24 and 72.8 ± 2.48%, respectively, were found in S. obliqua towards the intact leaves of Savitri cultivar followed by H. armigera and S. litura due to higher wax (691.7 ± 22.12 μg leaf−1) content (Table 3). The AAI (%) values towards the treatments were in the order of intact leaf (condition 4) > natural wax (condition 3) > mechanically damaged leaf (condition 4) > FFAs (condition 2) > alkanes (condition 1) for the generalists (S. obliqua > H. armigera > S. litura) (Table 3). Thus, among the treatments, intact leaves (condition 4) of the selected cultivars (Savitri > Nirmala) were acted as the most preferred cues for the generalists (S. obliqua > H. armigera > S. litura) over the other treatments (Table 3).
Selection of most effective synthetic wax chemicals
The attraction (%) towards the treatments over controls was always significantly higher in most effective n-alkanes (n-C16, n-C22, n-C24, n-C26) and FFAs (C12:0, C14:0, C18:1) for all three generalists (Table 4). Highest AAI (%) was observed towards hexadecane (n-C16) and octadecenoic acid (C18:1) as 48.2 ± 1.39 and 52.4 ± 1.24 %, respectively in S. obliqua (Table 4). Among the treatments, the most preferred wax chemicals were in the order of FFAs (C18:1 > C12:0 > C14:0) > n-alkanes (n-C16 > n-C24 > n-C26 > n-C22) as most attractive cues for the three generalists (S. obliqua > H. armigera > S. litura) over the other treatments (Table 4). All the AAI (%) values of the selected generalist pests were significantly (F2,6 ≥ 5.970, p ≤ 0.037) differed among them except least preferred individual cues (Table 4).
Comparison of effective synthetic and natural wax chemicals
The attraction (%) towards any treatments over controls was always significantly (χ2 ≥ 5.463, df = 1, P < 0.05) higher except natural alkane mixture in S. litura (Table 5). All the AAI (%) values were significantly (F2,6 ≥ 6.977, p ≤ 0.027) differed within the generalist pests except highest attractive intact leaves with two leaf equivalent amount of combined synthetic mixture (F2,6 = 4.083, p = 0.076) in condition 5 (Table 5). The AAI (%) values in different conditions were in the order of condition 5 > condition 3 > condition 4 > condition 2 > condition 1 for all the generalists (S. obliqua > H. armigera > S. litura) (Table 5).
Oviposition responses
The oviposition choice (%) towards any treatments over controls were always significantly (χ2 ≥ 3.855, df = 1, p < 0.05) higher except natural alkane mixture (condition 1) to S. litura and damaged leaf to all three generalists (Table 6). The OPI (%) values were without significant (F2,6 ≤ 3.108, p ≥ 0.118) differences within the generalist pests with few exceptions in conditions 2 and 5 as the plant was a potent host for them (Table 6). The OPI (%) values in different conditions were in the order of condition 5 > condition 4 > condition 3 > condition 2 > condition 1 for the generalists (H. armigera > S. litura > S. obliqua) (Table 6).
Larval attraction
The attraction (%) towards any treatments over controls was always significantly (χ2 ≥ 6.051, df = 1, p < 0.05) higher except natural alkane mixture in H. armigera and S. litura (Table 7). All the LAI (%) values were significantly (F2,6 ≥ 5.479, p ≤ 0.044) differed within the generalist pests with few exceptions in conditions 2, 4, and 5 (Table 7). In all the treatments, LAI (%) values for the generalist pests were in the order of S. obliqua > H. armigera > S. litura except condition 5 (H. armigera > S. litura > S. obliqua as in oviposition preference) (Table 7). The LAI (%) values in different conditions were in the same order as in AAI (%) (Table 7).
Larval feeding
The feeding choice (%) towards any treatments over controls was always without any significant (χ2 ≤ 0.601, df = 1, p > 0.05) differences because all treatments with intact leaves were acted as the most potent food for all the neonates (Table 8). The FI (%) values were significantly (F2,6 ≥ 6.021, p ≤ 0.037) differed within the generalist pests with few exceptions in conditions 1, 3, 4, and 5 (Table 8). The FI (%) values in different conditions were in the same order for the generalists as in AAI (%) (Table 8).
Discussion
The cuticular wax of the selected sesame cultivars (Savitri and Nirmala) provides synergism through different sensory cues in suitable oviposition site selection for the studied generalists (S. obliqua > H. armigera > S. litura) like another arctiid moth D. casignetum (Roy et al. 2012b; Roy and Barik 2012b, 2014; Roy 2019a). Total 14 n-alkanes from n-C9 to n-C44 and 12 FFAs (8 saturated + 4 monounsaturated) from C9:0 to C20:0 were detected from leaf cuticular wax of both sesame cultivars as major components with significant variations in their respective quantity (μg leaf−1), as previously reported to other plants (Sarkar et al. 2013a, 2013b; Mukherjee et al. 2014; Mitra et al. 2017; Das et al. 2019; Mobarak et al. 2020a). The most predominant n-alkane and FFA of the cultivars were n-C26 and C18:1, respectively present in the Savitri cultivar. In other instances, 5 major n-alkanes (n-C27, n-C29, n-C31 n-C33, and n-C35) were detected from sesame leaves, and among them, n-C29 and n-C33 were most abundant (Kim et al. 2007). Total 9 n-alkanes (n-C24 to n-C30, n-C32 and n-C33) and 13 FFAs (C12:0 to C20:0) were detected in the mature leaf surface wax of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. (Asteraceae), cultivar PAC-36), where n-C29 and C18:2, respectively, were the most predominant (Roy and Barik 2012b, 2014). Similarly, a total of 18 n-alkanes (n-C16 to n-C36) and 13 FFAs (C12:0 to C20:0) were detected in the leaf surface wax of jute (C. capsularis; cultivar: Sonali (JRC-321), Malvaceae), and among them, n-C29 and C18:1, respectively, were the most abundant (Roy 2019a). Furthermore, a total of 18 n-alkanes (n-C15 to n-C36) and 14 FFAs (C12:0 to C22:0) were detected in the leaf surface wax of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L., Fabaceae), and among them, n-C15 and C16:1, respectively, were most predominant (Mitra et al. 2020). Even, 20 n-alkanes (n-C15 to n-C36) and 13 FFAs (C12:0 to C21:0) were identified from green gram (Vigna radiata L., Fabaceae) leaves, and among them, n-C25 and C16:1, C21:0, respectively, were most abundant (Mobarak et al. 2020a).
Generally, n-alkanes and FFAs of different host plants can act as a short-range attractant for their respective insect pests (Schoonhoven et al. 2005; Li and Ishikawa 2006; Karmakar et al. 2016; Mitra et al. 2019). The short-distance behavioral responses of different insects were evaluated through different olfactometers (V-shaped, multi-tube, six-arm, Y-tube, etc. (Turlings et al. 2004, Koschier et al. 2000, Roy 2019a, Mitra et al. 2020)). The present Y-tube olfactometer bioassays revealed clear responses by the generalist pests (females and their larvae) to n-alkanes and FFAs present in leaf cuticular waxes of selected sesame cultivars. After reaching within a close range to the host plant, n-alkanes and FFAs were acted as a short-range attractant which facilitated oviposition induction in all gravid females as well as feeding in their larvae. Even, the role of olfaction was well documented in moths due to their typical nocturnal lifestyle (Cunningham et al. 1999). Visual (Goyret et al. 2007, Barragán-Fonseca et al. 2020), olfactory (Roy and Barik 2012b, 2014; Lucas-Barbosa et al. 2016; Das et al. 2019), tactile (Foster and Howard 1998; Roy 2019a), and gustatory (Feng et al. 2017) cues can themselves or in combinations with each other enhanced behaviors in host selection for oviposition as well as for larval feeding (Carlsson et al. 1999; Bandoly et al. 2015).
The intact leaves of selected cultivars (Savitri > Nirmala) were acted as the most preferred olfactory cues for the three generalists (S. obliqua > H. armigera > S. litura) over the other treatments. At the individual level, the most preferred wax chemicals were in the order of FFAs (C18:1 > C12:0 > C14:0) > n-alkanes (n-C16 > n-C24 > n-C26 > n-C22) as most attractive cues for the three generalists over the other treatments. The synthetic combination mixture mimicking the natural surface wax components having 4 n-alkanes (n-C16, n-C22, n-C24, n-C26) and 3 FFAs (C12:0, C14:0, C18:1) was indicated significant olfactory attraction followed by oviposition to all three generalists at leaf equivalent (μg leaf−1) amount of cultivar Savitri. Thus, these pest species use visual (color and shape), olfactory (odorous n-alkanes and FFAs), tactile (surface intactness (ultra-structure)), and gustatory (cuticular wax) cues in a synergistic manner for oviposition (adults) and feeding (larvae) preference towards Savitri. The female choice was also supported by their neonates through probably tactile and gustatory responses for feeding on a normal leaf over the de-waxed leaf of Savitri like other insects (Roy et al. 2012a; Mitra et al. 2017; Das et al. 2019).
In other instances, two FFAs (C18:1, C18:2) act as host finding as well as an ovipositional cue for the navel orange worm, Amyelois transitella (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) (Phelan et al. 1991). Five long-chain n-alkanes (n-C26 to n-C30) present in the epicuticular wax of corn (Zea mays L., Poaceae) and Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica (Houtt.) Ronse Decraene, Polygonaceae) leaves act as oviposition stimulants in the European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) (Udayagiri and Mason 1997; Li and Ishikawa 2006). Even the arctiid moth D. casignetum were attracted by 5 predominant n-alkanes (n-C18, n-C23, n-C24, n-C28, and n-C32) from leaf surface wax of sunflower at different concentrations (Roy and Barik 2012b). In addition, 6 FFAs (C16:0, C16:1, C18:0, C18:1, C18:2, and C18:3) from the same sunflower leaf surface wax produced the highest attraction to the same pest D. casignetum (Roy and Barik 2014). The synthetic combination mixture of 4 n-alkanes (n-C17, n-C18, n-C27, n-C29) and 5 FFAs (C16:0, C16:1, C18:1, C18:2, C18:3) was most attractive to D. casignetum adults, whereas the same mixture excluding 2 n-alkanes (n-C27, n-C29) was also indicated oviposition preference at jute leaf at the equivalent amount (Roy 2019a). Even, 4 n-alkanes (n-C25, n-C27, n-C29, n-C36) out of 20 n-alkanes and 3 FFAs (C16:1, C18:0, C18:3) out of 13 FFAs in combination were acted as a short-range attractant and oviposition stimulant in females of S. obliqua at green gram leaf equivalent amount (Mobarak et al. 2020a). Even, the obtained results indicated that the three generalists (S. obliqua > H. armigera > S. litura) were mostly attracted towards the synthetic blend of n-C16, n-C22, n-C24, and n-C26, and C12:0, C14:0, and C18:1 present in the leaf surface waxes of Savitri at leaf equivalent amount (μg leaf−1). The degree of olfactory responses of the generalists (females > larvae) was maximum towards two leaf equivalent amount of combined synthetic (4 n-alkanes + 3 FFAs) mixture-treated intact leaf of Savitri due to optimum dose-response relationship. Similarly, oviposition and feeding preference of the generalists were maximum towards four leaf equivalent amount of the same synthetic mixture-treated intact leaf of Savitri due to a large amount of wax chemicals along with other physicochemical properties act in a synergistic manner. They also showed clear preference with significant differences towards normal leaf over the de-waxed leaf of the cultivars (Savitri > Nirmala).
The findings could explain the clue how gravid females of the generalist pests choose their oviposition site in such a perfect fashion for their potential hosts through different sensory modalities (visual (shape and color), olfactory (n-alkanes and FFAs as semiochemicals), tactile (leaf surface intactness (ultra-structure)), and gustatory (leaf surface wax)) in a synergistic manner for better survival and growth of their neonates like other insects (Carlsson et al. 1999; Mitra et al. 2019, 2020; Roy 2019a). Even, the behavioral responsiveness of the gravid females was also supported by their larval instars through attraction and feeding by these modalities also in a synergistic manner. Thus, the generalist females maximize their own fitness by laying eggs on their preferred host cultivar (Savitri > Nirmala) where their offspring perform best and which was supported by their larvae like other butterflies and moths (Birke and Aluja 2018; Mobarak et al. 2020a). Furthermore, this study also suggested that the synthetic blends of 4 n-alkanes and 3 FFAs along with the green leaf volatiles (GLVs (need to determine)) of the most preferred or susceptible cultivar of sesame (Savitri) can be used as a lure to develop baited trap. In addition, resistant cultivars like Nirmala can be used against the generalists for their ecological management in future.
References
Altesor P, González A (2018) Preference–performance in a specialist sawfly on congeneric host plants. Entomol Exp Appl 166(6):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12690
Bandoly M, Hilker M, Steppuhn A (2015) Oviposition by Spodoptera exigua on Nicotiana attenuata primes induced plant defense against larval herbivory. Plant J 83(4):661–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12918
Barragán-Fonseca K, Vanloon JA, Dicke M, Lucas-Barbosa D (2020) Use of visual and olfactory cues of flowers of two brassicaceous species by insect pollinators. Ecol Entomol 45:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12775
Barron AB (2001) The life and death of Hopkins’ host-selection principle. J Insect Behav 14:725–737. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013033332535
Basavaraj K, Naik MI, Jagadish KS, Shadakshari YG (2018) Studies on age specific fecundity life tables for Helicoverpa armigera Hub., on sunflower (Helianthus annuusL.). J Ento Zool Stud 6(2):1364–1368
Birke A, Aluja M (2018) Do mothers really know best? Complexities in testing the preference-performance hypothesis in polyphagous frugivorous fruit flies. Bull Entomol Res 108(5):674–684. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007485317001213
Carlsson MA, Anderson P, Hartlieb E, Hansson BS (1999) Experience-dependent modification of orientational response to olfactory cues in larvae of Spodoptera littoralis. J Chem Ecol 25:2445–2454. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020865922827
Cunningham JP, Zalucki MP, West SA (1999) Learning in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): a new look at the behavior and control of a polyphagous pest. Bull Entomol Res 89(3):201–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007485399000310
Das S, Koner A, Barik A (2019) A beetle biocontrol agent of rice field weeds recognizes its host plants by surface wax long-chain alkanes and free fatty acids. Chemoecol 29:155–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00049-019-00285-1
Eigenbrode SD, Espelie KE (1995) Effects of plant epicuticular lipids on insect herbivores. Annu Rev Entomol 40:171–194. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.001131
Feng B, Qian K, Du YJ (2017) Floral volatiles from Vigna unguiculata are olfactory and gustatory stimulants for oviposition by the bean pod borer moth Maruca vitrata. Insects 8(2):e60. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8020060
Fernández PC, Braccini CL, Dávila C, Barrozo RB, Aráoz MVC, Cerrillo T, Gershenzon J, Reichelt M, Zavala JA (2019) The use of leaf surface contact cues during oviposition explains field preferences in the willow sawfly Nematus oligospilus. Sci Report 9:e4946. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41318-7
Foster SP, Howard AJ (1998) Influence of stimuli from Camellia japonica on ovipositional behavior of generalist herbivore Epiphyas postvittana. J Chem Ecol 24:1251–1275. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022455120922
Gotyal BS, Selvaraj K, Meena PN, Satpathy S (2015) Host plant resistance in cultivated jute and its wild relatives towards jute hairy caterpillar Spilosoma obliqua (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Florida Entomol 98(2):721–727. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.098.0248
Goyret J, Markwell PM, Raguso RA (2007) The effect of olfactory and visual stimuli decoupling on the foraging behavior of Manduca sexta. J Exp Biol 210:1398–1405. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.02752
Griese E, Pineda A, Pashalidou FG, Iradi EP, Hilker M, Dicke M, Fatouros NE (2020) Plant responses to butterfly oviposition partly explain preference–performance relationships on different brassicaceous species. Oecologia 192:463–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04590-y
Gripenberg S, Mayhew PJ, Parnell M, Roslin T (2010) A meta-analysis of preference–performance relationships in phytophagous insects. Ecol Lett 13(3):383–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01433.x
Ikeura H, Kobayashi F, Hayata Y (2010) How do Pieris rapae search for Brassicaceae host plants? Biochem Syst Ecol 38(6):1199–1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2010.12.007
Jetter R, Schäffer S (2001) Chemical composition of the Prunus laurocerasus leaf surface. Dynamic changes of the epicuticular wax film during leaf development. Plant Physiol 126(4):1725–1737. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.126.4.1725
Jetter R, Kunst L, Samuels AL (2006) Composition of plant cuticular waxes. In: Riederer M, Müller C (eds) Annual plant reviews, Biology of the plant cuticle, vol 23. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 145–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470988718.ch4
Karmakar A, Malik U, Barik A (2016) Effects of leaf epicuticular wax compounds from Solena amplexicaulis (Lam.) Gandhi on olfactory responses of a generalist insect herbivore. Allelopath J 37:253–272
Kim KS, Park SH, Jenks MA (2007) Changes in leaf cuticular waxes of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) plants exposed to water deficit. J Plant Physiol 164:1134–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2006.07.004
Koschier EH, Kogel WJD, Visser JH (2000) Assessing the attractiveness of volatile plant compounds to western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis. J Chem Ecol 26:2643–2655. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026470122171
Kumar R, Ali S (2010) Efficacy of botanical pesticides against Spilarctia obliqua in Sesamum indicum. Annals Plant Prot Sci 18(1):223–224
Li G, Ishikawa Y (2006) Leaf epicuticular wax chemicals of the Japanese knotweed Fallopia japonica as oviposition stimulants for Ostrinia latipennis. J Chem Ecol 32:595–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-005-9022-7
Little CM, Chapman TW, Hillier NK (2019) Considerations for insect learning in integrated pest management. J Insect Sci 19(4):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iez064
Liu Z, Li D, Gong P, Wu K (2004) Life table studies of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), on different host plants. Environ Entomol 33:1570–1576. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-33.6.1570
Lucas-Barbosa D, Sun P, Hakman A, Van Beek TA, Van Loon JJA, Dicke M (2016) Visual and odour cues: plant responses to pollination and herbivory affect the behavior of flower visitors. Funct Ecol 30(3):431–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12509
Malik U, Mitra S, Barik A (2017) Attraction of the biocontrol agent, Galerucella placida Baly (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to the leaf surface alkanes of the weed, Polygonum orientale L. Allelopath J 40:103–116. https://doi.org/10.26651/2017-40-1070
McCallum EJ, Cunningham JP, Lücker J, Zalucki MP, De Voss JJ, Botella JR (2011) Increased plant volatile production affects oviposition, but not larval development, in the moth Helicoverpa armigera. The J Exp Biol 214:3672–3677. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.059923
Mitra S, Sarkar N, Barik A (2017) Long-chain alkanes and fatty acids from Ludwigia octovalvis weed leaf surface waxes as short range attractant and ovipositional stimulant to Altica cyanea (Weber) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Bull Entomol Res 107(3):391–400. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007485316001012
Mitra P, Mobarak SH, Debnath R, Barik A (2019) The role of Lathyrus sativus flower surface wax in short-range attraction and stimulant for nymph laying by an adult viviparous aphid. Bull Entomol Res 110(2):231–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485319000531
Mitra P, Das S, Barik A (2020) Leaf waxes from Lathyrus sativus: short-range attractant and stimulant for nymph laying in a viviparous insect. Chemoecol 30:117–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00049-020-00303-7
Mobarak SH, Koner A, Mitra S, Mitra P, Barik A (2020a) The importance of leaf surface wax as short-range attractant and oviposition stimulant in a generalist Lepidoptera. J Appl Entomol 144(7):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12769
Mobarak SH, Roy N, Barik A (2020b) Two-sex life table and feeding dynamics of Spilosoma obliqua Walker (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) on three green gram cultivars. Bull Entomol Res 110:219–230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485319000452
Mohapatra MM, Gupta PK (2018) Evaluation of insecticides against Bihar Hairy Caterpillar, Spilosoma obliqua Walk. on black gram, Vigna mungo (Linn.). Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 7(6):605–608. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.706.069
Mukherjee A, Sarkar N, Barik A (2014) Long-chain free fatty acids from Momordica cochinchinensis leaves as attractants to its insect pest, Aulacophora foveicollis Lucas (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J Asia Pac Entomol 17(1):229–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2014.01.010
Müller C, Riederer M (2005) Plant surface properties in chemical ecology. J Chem Ecol 31:2621–2651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-005-7617-7
Parr MJ, Tran BMD, Simmonds MSJ, Kite GC, Credland PF (1998) Influence of some fatty acids on oviposition by the bruchid beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. J Chem Ecol 24:1577–1593. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020894410107
Phelan PL, Roelofs CJ, Youngman RR, Baker TC (1991) Characterization of chemicals mediating ovipositional host-plant finding by Amyelois transitella females. J Chem Ecol 17:599–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00982129
Potter KA, Bronstein J, Davidowitz G (2012) Choice of oviposition sites by Manduca sexta and its consequences for egg and larval performance. Entomol Exp Appl 144(3):286–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458-2012.01289.x
Renwick J, Chew FS (1994) Oviposition behavior in Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 39:377–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.39.010194.002
Roy N (2019a) Jute leaf physicochemical cues mediated behavioral responses of Diacrisia casignetum Kollar. Agric Res 8:287–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-018-0362-2
Roy N (2019b) Life table and economic threshold concept for ecologically sustainable management of Diacrisia casignetum Kollar (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) on jute. Entomon 44(2):103–110. https://doi.org/10.33307/entomon.v44i.436
Roy N (2020) Population ecology and ETs based time series for climate smart pest management of Spilosoma obliqua Walker. Entomon 45(1):15–30. 10.33307
Roy N (2021) Population dynamics and economic thresholds based time series for smart pest management of sesame. Int J Trop Insect Sci:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-021-00437-3
Roy N, Barik A (2012a) The impact of variation in foliar constituents of sunflower on development and reproduction of Diacrisia casignetum Kollar (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Psyche 2012:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/812091
Roy N, Barik A (2012b) Alkanes used for host recognition by the arctiid moth, Diacrisia casignetum Kollar. J Entomol Res 36:345–350
Roy N, Barik A (2013) Influence of four host plants on feeding, growth and reproduction of Diacrisia casignetum (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Entomol Sci 16(1):112–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-8298.2012.00546.x
Roy N, Barik A (2014) Long-chain fatty acids: semiochemicals for host location by the insect pest, Diacrisia casignetum. J Kansas Entomol Soc 87:22–36. https://doi.org/10.2317/JKES130521.1
Roy N, Laskar S, Barik A (2012a) The attractiveness of odorous esterified fatty acids to the potential biocontrol agent, Altica cyanea. J Asia Pac Entomol 15:277–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2012.03.001
Roy N, Laskar S, Barik A (2012b) Determination of n-alkane profile through developmental state of sunflower leaves. The South Pacific J Nat Appl Sci 30:72–76. https://doi.org/10.1071/sp12008
Sarkar N, Mukherjee A, Barik A (2013a) Olfactory responses of Epilachna dodecastigma (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to long-chain fatty acids from Momordica charantia leaves. Arthropod Plant Interact 7:339–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-013-9249-0
Sarkar N, Mukherjee A, Barik A (2013b) Long-chain alkanes: allelochemicals for host location by the insect pest, Epilachna dodecastigma (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Appl Entomol Zool 48:171–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-013-0168-4
Schoonhoven LM, Van Loon JJA, Dicke M (2005) Insect-plant biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
Singh G, Rup PJ, Koul O (2007) Acute, sublethal and combination effects of Azadirachtin and Bacillus thuringiensis toxins on Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuiidae) larvae. Bull Entomol Res 97:351–357. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485307005019
Singh R, Koul O, Rup PJ, Jindal J (2011) Oviposition and feeding behavior of the maize borer, Chilo partellus, in response to eight essential oil allelochemicals. Entomol Exp Appl 138(1):55–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2010.01071.x
Späthe A, Reinecke A, Olsson SB, Kesavan S, Knaden M, Hansson BS (2013) Plant species- and status-specific odorant blends guide oviposition choice in the moth Manduca sexta. Chem Senses 38:147–159
Turlings TCJ, Davison AC, Tamò C (2004) A six-arm olfactometer permitting simultaneous observation of insect attraction and odour trapping. Physiol Entomol 29(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.2004.0362.x
Udayagiri S, Mason CE (1997) Epicuticular wax chemicals in Zea mays influence oviposition in Ostrinia nubilalis. J Chem Ecol 23:1675–1687. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000006443.72203.f7
Wolfenbarger LL, Phifer PR (2000) The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants. Science 290(5499):2088–2093. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5499.2088
Xue M, Pang YH, Wang HT, Li Q-L, Liu T-X (2010) Effects of four host plants on biology and food utilization of the cutworm, Spodoptera litura. J Insect Sci 10:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.010.2201
Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA, p 663
Acknowledgements
The author is highly grateful to the IICB, Kolkata, for GC analysis, West Bengal, India.
Funding
The study was funded by a research project provided by West Bengal Department of Science and Technology [File No.: ST/P/S&T/1G-29/2018], from Government of West Bengal, India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Author (NR) designed the whole study, including sample collection, chemical analysis, index calculation, data analysis and draft the manuscript with the help of institutional support.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Edited by Leandro P Ribeiro
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 33 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roy, N. Synergism in Host Selection Behavior of Three Generalist Insects Towards Leaf Cuticular Wax of Sesame Cultivars. Neotrop Entomol 50, 812–827 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-021-00892-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-021-00892-0