Abstract
Verticillium dahliae is a soil-borne phytopathogen and the causal agent of Verticillium wilt. It affects many agriculturally important crops around the world, including cotton. In Australia, the billion-dollar cotton industry is increasingly impacted by Verticillium wilt. Internationally it has been reported that the defoliating V. dahliae Vegetative Compatibility Group (VCG) 1A causes severe damage to cotton. In Australia however, the non-defoliating VCG2A is causing more severe damage to crops in fields than the defoliating VCG1A. This review examines the current research to understand the Australian V. dahliae situation, including current classification systems, genetic analyses and management strategies. It appears that virulence cannot be defined solely by VCG in Australian Verticillium dahliae isolates causing disease in cotton, and that the industry must continually adapt their practices in order to keep the disease under control.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In Australia, cotton is a growing billion-dollar industry. Cotton yields have increased from 500 kg per hectare in the 1960’s to 2000 kg per hectare in 2013 (Hamilton 2016). Cotton crops are largely furrow irrigated, grown on alkaline clay soils and tend to be located near flood plains. There is often reduced or minimum tillage, tail-water recirculated and in some areas permanent bed systems (Kirkby et al. 2013). Sustainability and growth of the cotton industry is reliant on improved cotton varieties, management of soil and water resources, and control of weeds, insect and diseases (Constable 2004). Although Verticillium wilt in Australian cotton is generally well managed, other countries have seen economic losses of 50% or more (Wu and Subbarao 2014). The average incidence levels of Verticillium wilt caused by V. dahliae in Australian cotton are relatively low but yield losses can vary between 10 and 62% in some fields (Holman et al. 2016). However, the recent discovery of the defoliating VCG1A and the disease severity of the non-defoliating VCG2A present an additional problem for management of Verticillium wilt as incidences rise (Chapman et al. 2016; Dadd-Daigle et al. 2020; Jensen and Redfern 2017; Kirkby et al. 2013). Hence, Verticillium wilt is becoming a major concern for the Australian cotton industry.
Verticillium dahliae
Verticillium encompasses a group of soil-borne ascomycetes. As of 2011, ten Verticillium species have been described (Inderbitzin et al. 2011), including V. dahliae, the main causal agent of Verticillium wilt. Verticillium dahliae is responsible for disease in over 400 plant species across the world. These include many economically important crops such as olives, tomatoes, potatoes, lettuce and cotton (Bhat and Subbarao 1999; Inderbitzin et al. 2011).
The life cycle of V. dahliae allows it to persist on farms for many years. It survives in soil in highly melanised resistant structures, known as microsclerotia, for over 10 years (Davis et al. 1994; Klosterman et al. 2009). These microsclerotia germinate in the presence of host plants, producing hyphae that penetrate the root cortex and reach the xylem. As hyphae and conidia grow within the xylem, the plant host can express symptoms of wilting, necrosis and leaf discolouration (Klimes et al. 2015). As symptoms progress, V. dahliae enters a saprophytic phase where the infection expands to other tissues, such as leaves, and a mass production of microsclerotia occurs. The extent of symptoms can depend on the susceptibility of the host and the infecting strain of V. dahliae. While some plants suffer severe wilting and necrosis, other infections are less severe, allowing the plant to recover (Daayf 2015).
Historically, the characterisation and classification of V. dahliae has been based on the symptoms exhibited by the host plant, or by the interaction of pathogen virulence and host resistance genes. Consequently, this has led to the use of host-specific terminology and classification, resulting in a number of different classification systems. Verticillium dahliae strains infecting tomato and cotton are divided into “races”, classified by the presence or absence of the Ave1 gene (Hu et al. 2015; Maruthachalam et al. 2010). Strains from cotton are also categorised into defoliating (D) and non-defoliating (ND) pathotypes (Daayf et al. 1995). While the D and ND pathotypes largely align to races 1 and 2, respectively, this is not true for all strains and the systems are generally not used interchangeably (Hu et al. 2015). Host-specific pathology groups also include “eggplant pathotype”, “tomato pathotype”, “mint pathotype” and “sweet pepper pathotype” (Dung et al. 2012; Komatsu et al. 2001; Papaioannou et al. 2013b). While these classifications are generally understood in studies that focus on strains infecting a single host type, complexity arises when investigating Verticillium strains independently of the plant host they infect. Currently, there is only one system that classifies all V. dahliae strains into groups, known as Vegetative Compatibility Groups (VCGs).
Vegetative Compatibility Groups (VCGs) in Verticillium dahliae
VCGs are determined by strain interaction and describe the formation of prototrophic heterokaryons, a fusion of two genetically distinct cells that occurs when two hyphal cells meet (Puhalla and Mayfield 1974). While not molecularly characterised in V. dahliae, related fungal models have shown that two sets of gene loci, known as vic (vegetative incompatibility) and het (heterokaryon incompatibility) govern the process. For isolates to form a heterokaryon, the alleles at the het or vic loci must be identical (Jiménez-Gasco et al. 2013). In practice, the VCG determination process requires that V. dahliae strains are mutated to become nitrogen non-utilizing “nit mutants”. Mutants strains, one or two with known and the other with an unknown VCG, are placed on opposite sides of a minimal media agar plate and monitored for signs of prototrophic growth. If the mutant isolates are able to form heterokaryons, which allow growth on minimal media, the unknown isolate is assigned the same VCG as the known isolate (Joaquim and Rowe 1990). This method has led to the identification of five VCGs in V. dahliae, namely, VCG1 2, 3, 4 and 6, with VCG1 and VCG2 further characterised into A and B subgroups, and VCG4 into A, B and AB (Papaioannou and Typas 2015; Strausbaugh 1993).
Vegetative Compatibility Groups have been used to track the evolution and movement of V. dahliae. Several groups found that isolates within VCGs are phylogenetically similar (Collado-Romero et al. 2006) or fit a clonal reproductive model (Dung et al. 2013; Milgroom et al. 2014). Others argued that although isolates of the same VCG may be genetically similar, they are often phylogenetically distant, with members of different subgroups being more closely related (Jiménez-Gasco et al. 2013). In most instances VCGs are monophyletic, with some exceptions such as VCG2B (Collado-Romero et al. 2008). Following these studies, the origin of the V. dahliae species has been speculated to be in Europe (Short et al. 2015), while the virulent VCG1A has been traced back to North America (Milgroom et al. 2016).
Different plant hosts are often associated with different V. dahliae VCGs. VCG2A is known to be highly pathogenic to tomato (Tsror et al. 2001), VCG2B is highly aggressive in mint (Dung et al. 2013), VCG4A is highly pathogenic to potato (El-Bebany et al. 2013), and VCG1A is virulent in olives (Dervis et al. 2007). In cotton, it has generally been reported that VCG1A causes significant damage while VCG2A and VCG4B are less virulent, although there have been some reports of VCG2B causing damage (Dervis and Bicici 2005; Dervis et al. 2008; Elena 1999; Jiménez-Gasco et al. 2013; Korolev et al. 2001).
While VCGs are currently the most widespread method to describe V. dahliae populations, the genetics behind VCGs in V. dahliae are not well understood. In their attempt to create a high-throughput VCG screening method, Papaioannou and Typas (2015) also sought to understand the genetic relationship between the two, “strong” and “weak”, heterokaryon reactions observed. These authors found that weak interactions tend to be unstable, but there is still a transfer of genetic material, suggesting that they may be vegetatively compatible. Although many other studies acknowledge that weak reactions occur, most regard only strong interactions as compatible (Strausbaugh 1993). This could impact the reliability of results examining relatedness amongst VCGs and highlights a need for a narrower classification system that does not suffer from these issues. Additionally, as the VCG determination process is labour intensive and time-consuming, several groups have attempted to develop alternative methods (Collado-Romero et al. 2009; El-Bebany et al. 2013; Papaioannou et al. 2013a). However, currently, no molecular method is as reliable as the traditional method.
Verticillium dahliae in Australian cotton
Since 1983, Verticillium-infected plant samples have been collected and V. dahliae isolates maintained and stored in the culture collection of the NSW Department of Primary Industries (Kirkby et al. 2013). The average incidence of Verticillium wilt has generally been low throughout NSW. The incidence rose from 5.5% in 2013/2014 to 7.1% in 2014/2015 and 6.3% in the 2015/2016 season (Chapman et al. 2016). Disease symptoms are becoming more severe in some patches of Verticillium wilt, with yield reductions reported to be greater than 6 bales/ha. There are concerns that this increase in severity is related to the ND VCG2A strain reported in 2014 (Dadd-Daigle et al. 2020; Smith et al. 2014).
It was previously thought that only one VCG type, ND VCG4B, was present in Australia, but in 2014, ND VCG2A was identified (Smith et al. 2014). Following the discovery of ND VCG2A, analysis of V. dahliae historical samples taken from the NSW Department of Primary Industries culture collection revealed the presence of the D VCG1A (Chapman et al. 2016). The D VCG1A has been the cause of severe disease and crop loss overseas (Jiménez-Díaz et al. 2006). However, despite the presence of VCG1A in the historical samples, typical VCG1A disease presentation, including the typical crop losses and complete defoliation of infected plants, has not been a widespread observation in Australia. It is not clear what is causing the disparity between the severity of D VCG1A and ND VCG2A disease in Australia and overseas. It is possible, given that VCG2A has been shown to infect weeds commonly found on cotton fields (Yildiz et al. 2009), that VCG2A V. dahliae has simply become the most prevalent strain on Australian cotton fields, amplified by the polyetic nature of the pathogen, and has acquired the ability to defoliate cotton plants. However, further analysis of the relationship of genetics to pathogenicity and disease severity in Australian V. dahliae VCGs is required.
Insights from Verticillium dahliae genome sequencing
In 2011 the V. dahliae VdLs.17 and V. albo-atrum genomes were sequenced using the whole genome shotgun approach via Sanger sequencing (Klosterman et al. 2011). Although the two ~ 33 Mb genomes were highly similar, there were four 300 kb regions in V. dahliae which had no synteny with V. albo-atrum. These regions were denoted “Lineage Specific” (LS) regions. The LS regions were found to be highly repetitive and represented over 50% of all identifiable transposable elements contained in V. dahliae. Faino et al. (2015) used PacBio long read sequences to create a “gapless” genome and have since suggested that there are problems with the initial V. dahliae VdLs.17 sequence. These authors argue that their method of genome assembly helps to prevent problems associated with repetitive regions that cause issues when assembling shorter contigs. Using PacBio sequencing, the VdLs.17 genome was re-assembled. The newly constructed genome indicates that 12% is composed of repetitive regions, four times higher than was previously thought.
With the availability of a V. dahliae reference genome, there is an increasing understanding of what makes V. dahliae such an adaptable pathogen with a broad host range. There are suggestions that transposons could be a major reason for the genomic diversity observed and that they contribute to the V. dahliae “plastic genome” driving adaption to new plant hosts (Amyotte et al. 2012; Faino et al. 2016). This is supported by de Jonge et al. (2013) who compared the VdLs.17 reference strain with 10 V. dahliae genomes taken from geographically separate regions and hosts. The study revealed that despite the genomes being highly similar, chromosome rearrangements had occurred between all strains. Using RNA-seq data and deletion studies, they showed that effector genes present in the LS regions were important to the development of disease (de Jonge et al. 2012, 2013), suggesting that chromosome rearrangements and these LS regions could contribute to V. dahliae’s adaptation to new hosts. Jin et al. (2017) explored the organism’s use of alternative splicing and developed their own algorithms, alongside previously available software, to analyse V. dahliae cDNA sequences for common splicing events. They found that V. dahliae has one of the most sophisticated splicing systems in eukaryotes, outside of animals, and believe that this alternative splicing could explain some of V. dahliae’s plasticity.
There are an increasing number of studies suggesting that horizontal gene transfer plays an important role in V. dahliae’s success as a pathogen. An analysis of V. dahliae isolated from cotton in China, revealed the presence of a virulence gene believed to have originated in Fusarium oxysporum, a related fungal pathogen often found infecting cotton on the same farm (Chen et al. 2017). Their deletion experiments found that removal of this gene affected the ability of the V. dahliae strain to infect cotton, but not lettuce or tomato, highlighting it’s ability to acquire new virulence genes as it expands to different hosts. There has also been evidence of V. dahliae acquiring genes from the host plant and from bacteria (de Jonge et al. 2012; van Kooten et al. 2019). These studies used phylogenetic analysis to look for candidate genes that are found outside the Verticillium spp. They found numerous candidate genes of bacterial and plant origin, many of which could potentially aid V. dahliae in getting past the host plant’s defences.
Management strategies for the control of Verticillium wilt
The nature of V. dahliae infection makes elimination of the pathogen difficult, however, multiple management strategies have been applied over the years. As the V. dahliae life cycle is dependent on microsclerotia present in crop soil, currently the two main strategies target either the soil itself, for example by soil fumigation, or the plants through development of resistant varieties (Short et al. 2015). Soil fumigation aims to eliminate microsclerotia in crop soil. Traditionally, methyl bromide was used to control pathogen populations, but was classified as a Class 1 stratospheric, ozone-depleting substance and international regulations dictated by the Montreal Protocol now restrict the use of this chemical (Martin 2003). Multiple studies have explored alternatives, including green manures, anaerobic soil disinfection and anaerobic digestion. Green manure is a method utilising volatile components from plant waste to reduce the number of microsclerotia (Yohalem and Passey 2011). Anaerobic soil disinfection uses microbial activity from agricultural or horticultural waste products, combined with mulched plastics, to deplete available oxygen in soil, creating anaerobic conditions to prevent fungal growth (Goud et al. 2004). Anaerobic digestion uses liquid digestate, a by-product from biogas production, as a bio-fertiliser to control microsclerotia levels (Wei et al. 2016). However, the suitability of these methods in commercial processes is still questionable. While, green manures and anaerobic digestion are still relatively new and understudied, the well-studied variants, such as Brassica sp., are deemed insufficient (Neubauer et al. 2014) and anaerobic soil disinfection is not currently economically viable (Wei et al. 2016).
Production of resistant cotton varieties is a key strategy in the prevention of Verticillium wilt. The development of resistant varieties in Australia has been ongoing for more than 30 years, with the release of Sicala V-1 in 1990, and Sicala V-2 in 1994 (Liu et al. 2013). Despite successes with Sicala V-2 and subsequent varieties derived from it, the incidence of Verticillium wilt has continued to rise in recent years (Kirkby et al. 2013). This could be linked to the temperature tolerance, as currently the V. dahliae resistance in available cotton varieties breaks down when temperatures drop below 22˚C (Quinn et al. 2018). Although there is ongoing research into Verticillium resistance (Li et al. 2018, 2019; Zhang et al. 2018), the development of new cotton varieties that provide adequate yield is slow, and the current varieties do not provide a substantial increase in resistance (Dadd-Daigle et al. 2020). Also, without a rapid diagnostic system that classifies V. dahliae into groups meaningful for Australian cotton, it is difficult to develop targeted and effective strategies.
Currently, crop rotation is one of the methods used to help manage Verticillium wilt on cotton farms in Australia. Crop rotation is the practice of varying the successive crops in a particular field to assist in the control of disease and weed management. Each crop varies in its susceptibility to certain pathogens. The success of crop rotation relies on initial inoculum levels in the soil, the number of rotations with non-host crops and the wetting and drying cycles that assist in the breakdown of inoculum in the soil (Wheeler et al. 2019). For example, most cotton farmers rotate with barley or sorghum as they are not listed as host crops for V. dahliae. While commodity prices are the short-term driving force, farms with high disease levels are looking at rotation to ensure cotton remains sustainable in the long term (K. Kirby, personal communication, September 2016). The current recommendations to growers are long rotations with moderate irrigation to reduce overall pathogen levels and prevent widespread movement of the microsclerotia (Holman et al. 2016; Scheikowski et al. 2019).
The development of real-time PCR protocols to determine microsclerotial load from soil samples should assist with managing crop rotation practices (Banno et al. 2011; Gharbi et al. 2016). Removal of the rotational crop plant debris has also been shown to reduce the number of microsclerotia in the soil, but does sacrifice soil health (Chawla et al. 2012). However, the known host range of V. dahliae, both symptomatic and asymptomatic, is expanding as the pathogen comes into contact with new plant species. There have been instances where a symptomless host has exhibited extensive vascular colonization and so contributes to the microsclerotial load despite the lack of symptoms (Wheeler and Johnson 2016). This makes selection of a suitable rotation crop more complex and highlights the need for a better understanding of the genomics of V. dahliae. In some instances, after multiple years of crop rotation followed by a cotton crop, the incidence of Verticillium wilt rises to match those found on farms that have had continuous cotton growth (Wheeler et al. 2019).
Given that the current attempts to mitigate Verticillium wilt on cotton farms is becoming increasingly ineffective, new strategies need to be explored for use in Australia. One area that hasn’t been well examined in Australian cotton is the use of endophytes as a biological control. The idea behind this strategy is to pre-infect the plants with a microbe that will inhabit the same niche as V. dahliae, preventing infection by the pathogen. This has been explored with both bacterial and fungal endophytes (Li et al. 2012; Vagelas and Leontopoulos 2015) used the less virulent V. nigrescens to take up the niche usually filled by V. dahliae, preventing the infiltration of conidia by the more virulent species, while Yuan et al. (2017) looked at using unrelated fungal species as seed treatments. Although both studies saw a reduction in V. dahliae caused Verticillium wilt, the use of Penicillium simplicissimum and Leptosphaeria sp. also saw an increase in cotton seed production as the number of cotton bolls increased (Yuan et al. 2017). As endophytes have been shown to be beneficial in other areas of crop sustainability, such as protection from insect pests and abiotic stress (Lugtenberg et al. 2016), this area could be hugely beneficial to the Australian cotton industry which is often heavily impacted by water availability.
Improving future understanding of the Verticillium wilt problem in Australia
The nature of Verticillium wilt in Australian cotton is an interesting problem. Large patches of severe Verticillium wilt have been found to be caused by the ND VCG2A (Dadd-Daigle et al. 2020; Jensen and Redfern 2017), which is contrary to reporting on other cotton farms around the world. This could be dependent on factors other than the isolate, such as the Australian environment, or the farming conditions, and is an area that warrants further exploration. While studies to further examine the Australian V. dahliae population are currently being conducted, no study to date has indicated what causes the difference in disease potential between Australian and international cotton crops. In addition, the genetic analyses are revealing an increasing number of methods by which V. dahliae can adapt. It is no wonder that strategies that work some of the time, such as crop rotation or the use of resistant varieties, are becoming less effective (Kirkby et al. 2013; Wheeler et al. 2019).
There is an increasing need for new mitigation strategies or the development of new cotton varieties resistant to Verticillium wilt. However, in order to create and implement these strategies, the current classification system needs to be improved to better represent the V. dahliae present on Australian cotton farms. Characterisation of the genetics controlling virulence has improved the classification of VCGs within related Fusarium sp. by increasing molecular clarity between isolates and developing new classification systems (Carvalhais et al. 2019). Although there is still some debate surrounding the best tools to diagnostically identify virulent Fusarium oxysporum strains (Magdama et al. 2019), a similar molecular understanding could improve the VCG classification system within V. dahliae by establishing narrower classifications or by implementing a new system based on virulence genes unrelated to VCGs.
Future research to improve Verticillium wilt on Australian cotton farms needs to largely build on current research efforts. An improved system for quantification of inoculum in soils and a better understanding of the inoculum to disease thresholds for different VCGs can clarify the effectiveness of crop rotation (Wheeler et al. 2019). While an improved understanding of the environmental conditions and how current farming methods impact Verticillium wilt on Australian farms can help inform best farming practices (Kirkby et al. 2013). It is only through continued development of new tools and a better understanding of V. dahliae genetics to rapidly analyse Verticillium wilt samples that growers may be able to stay ahead of the pathogen, preventing a situation where yield loss due to disease outweighs potential yield.
References
Amyotte SG, Tan X, Pennerman K, del Mar Jimenez-Gasco M, Klosterman SJ, Ma L-J, Dobinson KF, Veronese P (2012) Transposable elements in phytopathogenic Verticillium spp.: insights into genome evolution and inter- and intra-specific diversification. BMC Genom 13:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-314
Banno S, Saito H, Sakai H, Urushibara T, Ikeda K, Kabe T, Kemmochi I, Fujimura M (2011) Quantitative nested real-time PCR detection of Verticillium longisporum and V. dahliae in the soil of cabbage fields. J Gen Plant Pathol 77:282–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-011-0335-9
Bhat RG, Subbarao KV (1999) Host range specificity in Verticillium dahliae. Phytopathology 89:1218–1225. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.12.1218
Carvalhais LC, Henderson J, Rincon-Florez VA, O’Dwyer C, Czislowski E, Aitken EAB, Drenth A (2019) Molecular diagnostics of banana fusarium wilt targeting secreted-in-xylem genes. Front Plant Sci 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00547
Chapman TA, Chambers GA, Kirkby K, Jiménez-Díaz RM (2016) First report of the presence of Verticillium dahliae VCG1A in Australia Australasian. Plant Dis Notes 11:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13314-016-0197-2
Chawla S, Woodward JE, Wheeler TA (2012) Influence of Verticillium dahliae infested peanut residue on wilt development in subsequent cotton. Int J Agron 2012:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/212075
Chen JY, Liu C, Gui YJ, Si KW, Zhang DD, Wang J, Short Dylan PG, Huang JQ, Li NY, Liang Y, Zhang WQ, Yang L, Ma XF, Li TG, Zhou L, Wang BL, Bao YM, Subbarao Krishna V, Zhang GY, Dai XF (2017) Comparative genomics reveals cotton-specific virulence factors in flexible genomic regions in Verticillium dahliae and evidence of horizontal gene transfer from Fusarium. New Phytol 217:756–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14861
Collado-Romero M, Mercado-Blanco J, Olivares-García C, Valverde-Corredor A, Jiménez-Díaz RM (2006) Molecular variability within and among Verticillium dahliae vegetative compatibility groups determined by fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism and polymerase chain reaction markers. Phytopathology 96:485–495. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-96-0485
Collado-Romero M, Mercado-Blanco J, Olivares-García C, Jiménez-Díaz RM (2008) Phylogenetic analysis of Verticillium dahliae Vegetative Compatibility Groups. Phytopathol® 98:1019–1028. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-98-9-1019
Collado-Romero M, Berbegal M, Jiménez-Díaz RM, Armengol J, Mercado-Blanco J (2009) A PCR-based ‘molecular tool box’ for in planta differential detection of Verticillium dahliae vegetative compatibility groups infecting artichoke. Plant Pathol 58:515–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2008.01981.x
Constable G (2004) Research’s contribution to the evolution of the Australian cotton industry Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress Brisbane, Australia
Daayf F (2015) Verticillium wilts in crop plants: Pathogen invasion and host defence responses. Can J Plant Pathol 37:8–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2014.989908
Daayf F, Nicole M, Geiger J-P (1995) Differentiation of Verticillium dahliae populations on the basis of vegetative compatibility and pathogenicity on cotton . Eur J Plant Pathol 101:69–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01876095
Dadd-Daigle P, Kirkby K, Collins D, Cuddy W, Lonergan P, Roser S, Chowdhury PR, Labbate M, Chapman TA (2020) Virulence not linked with vegetative compatibility groups in Australian cotton Verticillium dahliae isolates. Aust J Crop Sci 14:633–640
Davis JR, Pavek JJ, Corsini DL, Sorensen LH, Schneider AT, Everson DO, Westermann DT, Huisman OC (1994) Influence of continuous cropping of several potato clones on the epidemiology of Verticillium wilt of potato. Phytopathology 84:207–214. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-84-207
de Jonge R, Peter van Esse H, Maruthachalam K, Bolton MD, Santhanam P, Saber MK, Zhang Z, Usami T, Lievens B, Subbarao KV, Thomma BPHJ (2012) Tomato immune receptor Ve1 recognizes effector of multiple fungal pathogens uncovered by genome and RNA sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:5110–5115. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119623109
de Jonge R, Bolton MD, Kombrink A, van den Berg GCM, Yadeta KA, Thomma BPHJ (2013) Extensive chromosomal reshuffling drives evolution of virulence in an asexual pathogen. Genome Res 23:1271–1282. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.152660.112
Dervis S, Bicici M (2005) Vegetative compatibility groups in Verticillium dahliae isolates from cotton in Turkey. Phytoparasitica 33:157–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029975
Dervis S, Erten L, Soylu S, Tok FM, Kurt S, Yıldız M, Soylu EM (2007) Vegetative compatibility groups in Verticillium dahliae isolates from olive in western Turkey . Eur J Plant Pathol 119:437–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-007-9183-z
Dervis S, Kurt S, Soylu S, Erten L, Mine Soylu E, Yıldız M, Tok FM (2008) Vegetative compatibility groups of Verticillium dahliae from cotton in the southeastern anatolia region of Turkey. Phytoparasitica 36:74–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02980750
Dung JKS, Peever TL, Johnson DA (2012) Verticillium dahliae populations from mint and potato are genetically divergent with predominant haplotypes. Phytopathology® 103:445–459. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-06-12-0133-R
Dung JKS, Peever TL, Johnson DA (2013) Verticillium dahliae populations from mint and potato are genetically divergent with Predominant Haplotypes. Phytopathology 103:445–459. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-06-12-0133-R
El-Bebany AF, Alkher H, Adam LR, Daayf F (2013) Vegetative compatibility of Verticillium dahliae isolates from potato and sunflower using nitrate non-utilizing (nit) mutants and PCR-based approaches. Can J Plant Pathol 35:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2012.702128
Elena K (1999) Genetic relationships among Verticillium dahliae isolates from cotton in Greece based on vegetative compatibility . Eur J Plant Pathol 105:609–616. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008771112068
Faino L, Seidl MF, Datema E, van den Berg GC, Janssen A, Wittenberg AH, Thomma BP (2015) Single-molecule real-time sequencing combined with optical mapping yields completely finished fungal genome. MBio 6:e00936-00915. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00936-15
Faino L, Seidl MF, Shi-Kunne X, Pauper M, van den Berg GCM, Wittenberg AHJ, Thomma BPHJ (2016) Transposons passively and actively contribute to evolution of the two-speed genome of a fungal pathogen. Genome Res 26:1091–1100. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.204974.116
Gharbi Y, Barkallah M, Bouazizi E, Cheffi M, Krid S, Triki MA, Gdoura R (2016) Development and validation of a new real-time assay for the quantification of Verticillium dahliae in the soil: a comparison with conventional soil plating. Mycol Progress 15:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-016-1196-6
Goud J-KC, Termorshuizen AJ, Blok WJ, van Bruggen AHC (2004) Long-term effect of biological soil disinfestation on Verticillium wilt. Plant Dis 88:688–694. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.7.688
Hamilton D (2016) Reaping the benefits of innovation - the Australian cotton story. Agric Sci 28:18–24
Holman S, Kirkby K, Smith L, Hartnett H (2016) Vert update:The latest in vert research CottonInfo fact sheet September 2016
Hu X-P, Gurung S, Short DPG, Sandoya GV, Shang W-J, Hayes RJ, Davis RM, Subbarao KV (2015) Nondefoliating and defoliating strains from cotton correlate with races 1 and 2 of Verticillium dahliae. Plant Dis 99:1713–1720. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-15-0261-RE
Inderbitzin P, Bostock RM, Davis RM, Usami T, Platt HW, Subbarao KV (2011) Phylogenetics and taxonomy of the fungal vascular wilt pathogen Verticillium, with the descriptions of five new species. PLoS One 6:e28341. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028341
Jensen M, Redfern R (2017) Breaking the Verticillium cycle vol Winter 2017. Cotton Research and Development Corporation, Narrabri
Jiménez-Díaz RM, Mercado-Blanco J, Olivares-García C, Collado-Romero M, Bejarano-Alcázar J, Rodríguez-Jurado D, Giménez-Jaime A, García-Jiménez J, Armengol J (2006) Genetic and virulence diversity in Verticillium dahliae populations infecting artichoke Eastern-Central Spain. Phytopathology 96:288–298. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-96-0288
Jiménez-Gasco MdM, Malcolm GM, Berbegal M, Armengol J, Jiménez-Díaz RM (2013) Complex molecular relationship between vegetative compatibility groups (VCGs) in Verticillium dahliae: VCGs do not always align with clonal lineages. Phytopathology 104:650–659. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-07-13-0180-R
Jin L, Li G, Yu D, Huang W, Cheng C, Liao S, Wu Q, Zhang Y (2017) Transcriptome analysis reveals the complexity of alternative splicing regulation in the fungus Verticillium dahliae. BMC Genom 18:130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3507-y
Joaquim TR, Rowe RC (1990) Reassessment of vegetative compatibility relationships among strains of Verticillium dahliae using nitrate-nonutilizing mutants. Phytopathology 80:1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-80-1160
Kirkby KA, Lonergan PA, Allen SJ (2013) Three decades of cotton disease surveys in NSW Australia. Crop Pasture Sci 64:774–779. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP13143
Klimes A, Dobinson KF, Thomma BPHJ, Klosterman SJ (2015) Genomics spurs rapid advances in our understanding of the biology of vascular wilt pathogens in the genus Verticillium. Ann Rev Phytopathol 53:181–198. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080614-120224
Klosterman SJ, Atallah ZK, Vallad GE, Subbarao KV (2009) Diversity, pathogenicity, and management of Verticillium species. Annu Rev Phytopathol 47:39–62. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081748
Klosterman SJ, Subbarao KV, Kang S, Veronese P, Gold SE, Thomma BPHJ, Chen Z, Henrissat B, Lee Y-H, Park J, Garcia-Pedrajas MD, Barbara DJ, Anchieta A, de Jonge R, Santhanam P, Maruthachalam K, Atallah Z, Amyotte SG, Paz Z, Inderbitzin P, Hayes RJ, Heiman DI, Young S, Zeng Q, Engels R, Galagan J, Cuomo CA, Dobinson KF, Ma L-J (2011) Comparative genomics yields insights into niche adaptation of plant vascular wilt pathogens. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002137. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002137
Komatsu T, Sumino A, Kageyama K (2001) Characterization of Verticillium dahliae isolates from potato on hokkaido by Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and REP-PCR analyses. J Gen Plant Pathol 67:23–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012982
Korolev N, Pérez-Artés E, Bejarano-Alcázar J, Rodríguez-Jurado D, Katan J, Katan T, Jiménez-Díaz RM (2001) Comparative study of genetic diversity and pathogenicity among populations of Verticillium dahliae from cotton in Spain and Israel European. J Plant Pathol 107:443–456. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011212426447
Li CH, Shi L, Han Q, Hu HL, Zhao MW, Tang CM, Li SP (2012) Biocontrol of verticillium wilt and colonization of cotton plants by an endophytic bacterial isolate. J Appl Microbiol 113:641–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05371.x
Li NY, Ma XF, Short DPG, Li TG, Zhou L, Gui YJ, Kong ZQ, Zhang DD, Zhang WQ, Li JJ, Subbarao KV, Chen JY, Dai XF (2018) The island cotton NBS-LRR gene GbaNA1 confers resistance to the non-race 1 Verticillium dahliae isolate Vd991. Mol Plant Pathol 19:1466–1479. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12630
Li ZK, Chen B, Li XX, Wang JP, Zhang Y, Wang XF, Yan YY, Ke HF, Yang J, Wu JH, Wang GN, Zhang GY, Wu LQ, Wang XY, Ma ZY (2019) A newly identified cluster of glutathione S-transferase genes provides Verticillium wilt resistance in cotton. Plant J 98:213–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14206
Liu S, Reid P, Stiller W, Constable G (2013) The contribution of new varieties to cotton yield improvement. CSIRO Plant Industry, Narrabri
Lugtenberg BJ, Caradus JR, Johnson LJ (2016) Fungal endophytes for sustainable crop production. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 92. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw194
Magdama F, Monserrate-Maggi L, Serrano L, Sosa D, Geiser DM, Jiménez-Gasco MdM (2019) Comparative analysis uncovers the limitations of current molecular detection methods for Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 4 strains. PLoS One 14:e0222727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222727
Martin FN (2003) Development of alternative strategies for management of soilborne pathogens currently controlled with methyl bromide. Annu Rev Phytopathol 41:325–350. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095514
Maruthachalam K, Atallah ZK, Vallad GE, Klosterman SJ, Hayes RJ, Davis RM, Subbarao KV (2010) Molecular variation among isolates of Verticillium dahliae and polymerase chain reaction-based differentiation of races. Phytopathology 100:1222–1230. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-04-10-0122
Milgroom MG, Jiménez-Gasco MdM, Olivares García C, Drott MT, Jiménez-Díaz RM (2014) Recombination between clonal lineages of the asexual fungus Verticillium dahliae detected by genotyping by sequencing. PLoS One 9:e106740. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106740
Milgroom MG, del Mar Jiménez-Gasco M, Olivares-García C, Jiménez-Díaz RM (2016) Clonal expansion and migration of a highly virulent, defoliating lineage of Verticillium dahliae. Phytopathology 106:1038–1046. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-11-15-0300-R
Neubauer C, Heitmann B, Müller C (2014) Biofumigation potential of Brassicaceae cultivars to Verticillium dahliae. Eur J Plant Pathol 140:341–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-014-0467-9
Papaioannou IA, Typas MA (2015) High-throughput assessment and genetic investigation of vegetative compatibility in Verticillium dahliae. J Phytopathol 163:475–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12345
Papaioannou IA, Dimopoulou CD, Typas MA (2013a) Structural and phylogenetic analysis of the rDNA intergenic spacer region of Verticillium dahliae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 347:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.12215
Papaioannou IA, Ligoxigakis EK, Vakalounakis DJ, Markakis EA, Typas MA (2013) Phytopathogenic, morphological, genetic and molecular characterization of a Verticillium dahliae population from Crete, Greece. Eur J Plant Pathol 136:577–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-013-0189-4
Puhalla JE, Mayfield JE (1974) The mechanism of heterokaryotic growth in Verticillium dahliae. Genetics 76:411–422
Quinn J, Eveleigh R, Ford B, Millyard J, Teague C, Barry C, Lee S, Devlin A, McDonald C (2018) Verticillium wilt. Facts on Friday vol October. Cotton Seed Distributors, Wee Waa
Scheikowski L, Smith L, Vadakattu G, Shuey T, Kafle D (2019) Longer rotations are required to reduce Verticillium where disease levels are high vol December 18-January19
Short DPG, Sandoya G, Vallad GE, Koike ST, Xiao C-L, Wu B-M, Gurung S, Hayes RJ, Subbarao KV (2015) Dynamics of Verticillium Species Microsclerotia in field soils in response to fumigation cropping patterns flooding. Phytopathology 105:638–645. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-09-14-0259-R
Smith L, Scheikowski L, Bauer B, Lehane J, Allen S (2014) Detection of New Pathogens in Australian Cotton Cotton Research and Development Corporationon behalf of the 17th Australian Cotton Conference
Strausbaugh CA (1993) Assessment of vegetative compatibility and virulence of Verticillium dahliae isolates from idaho potatoes and tester strains. Phytopathology 83:1253–1258
Tsror L, Hazanovsky M, Mordechi-Lebiush S, Sivan S (2001) Aggressiveness of Verticillium dahliae isolates from different vegetative compatibility groups to potato and tomato. Plant Pathol 50:477–482. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.2001.00587.x
Vagelas I, Leontopoulos S (2015) Cross-protection of cotton against Verticillium wilt by Verticillium nigrescens . Emirates J Food Agric 27:687–691. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2015-04-047
van Kooten M, Shi-Kunne X, Thomma BPHJ, Depotter JRL, Seidl MF (2019) The genome of the fungal pathogen Verticillium dahliae Reveals extensive bacterial to fungal gene transfer . Genome Biol Evol 11:855–868. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evz040
Wei F, Passey T, Xu X (2016) Effects of individual and combined use of bio-fumigation-derived products on the viability of Verticillium dahliae microsclerotia in soil. Crop Prot 79:170–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2015.09.008
Wheeler DL, Johnson DA (2016) Verticillium dahliae infects, alters plant biomass, and produces inoculum on rotation crops. Phytopathology® 106:602–613. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-07-15-0174-R
Wheeler TA, Bordovsky JP, Keeling JW (2019) The effectiveness of crop rotation on management of Verticillium wilt over time . Crop Prot 121:157–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.03.021
Wu BM, Subbarao KV (2014) A model for multiseasonal spread of Verticillium wilt of Lettuce. Phytopathology 104:908–917. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-12-13-0333-R
Yildiz A, Dogan M, Boz Ö, Benlioglu S (2009) Weed hosts of Verticillium dahliae in cotton fields in Turkey and characterization of V. dahliae isolates from weeds. Phytoparasitica 37:171–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-009-0027-6
Yohalem D, Passey T (2011) Amendment of soils with fresh and post-extraction lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) and lavandin (Lavandula × intermedia) reduce inoculum of Verticillium dahliae and inhibit wilt strawberry. Appl Soil Ecol 49:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.05.006
Yuan Y, Feng H, Wang L, Li Z, Shi Y, Zhao L, Feng Z, Zhu H (2017) Potential of endophytic fungi isolated from cotton roots for biological control against Verticillium wilt disease. PLoS One 12:e0170557. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170557
Zhang L, Wang M, Li N, Wang H, Qiu P, Pei L, Xu Z, Wang T, Gao E, Liu J, Liu S, Hu Q, Miao Y, Lindsey K, Tu L, Zhu L, Zhang X (2018) Long noncoding RNAs involve in resistance to Verticillium dahliae, a fungal disease in cotton. Plant Biotechnol J 16:1172–1185. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12861
Acknowledgements
This project is supported by funding from the Australian Government Department of Agriculture as part of its Rural R&D for Profit programme and the Cotton Research and Development Corporation. Rosalie Daniel and John Webster reviewed and improved an earlier version of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dadd-Daigle, P., Kirkby, K., Chowdhury, P.R. et al. The Verticillium wilt problem in Australian cotton. Australasian Plant Pathol. 50, 129–135 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-020-00756-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-020-00756-y