Abstract
Objective
To ascertain why children with end-stage retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) become blind, and to explore the impact of blindness on families.
Design
Mixed quantitative and qualitative methods.
Setting
Tertiary-care eye hospital in India.
Participants
Children with end-stage ROP and their carers.
Intervention
Cases presenting between June 2009 and July 2016 were identified from medical records and data extracted. Carers were contacted for missing information, if required. Data were analyzed to explore where failure had occurred in the process of screening and treatment. A subset of carers were selected for in-depth interviews to explore the impact of having a blind child. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using a thematic framework.
Main outcome measures
Parental perceptions.
Results
66 children were included: median age 4.3 y (range 3 mo–6 y), 58% boys. 74% were blind due to ‘screening failure’, which was associated with lower maternal education (P=0.03). Of the 17 case of treatment failure (24.6%), majority (12, 70%) had aggressive posterior ROP. A subset of carers of 18 children (50% boys) were interviewed, mostly mothers. Most reported impoverishment as a result of having a blind child, and many reported lack of access to special education, negative attitudes of others and concerns about the future.
Conclusions
Screening for retinopathy of prematurity needs to be expanded and counselling improved. Access to special education and rehabilitation need to be improved.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Blencowe H, Lawn JE, Vazquez T, Fielder A, Gilbert C. Preterm–associated visual impairment and estimates of retinopathy of prematurity at regional and global levels for 2010. Pediatr Res. 2013;74:35–49.
Blencowe H MS, Gilbert C. Update on blindness due to retinopathy of prematurity globally and in India. Indian Pediatr. 2016;53:89–92.
Ministry of Health. India. SNCU: Progress Report for 2 Years India, 2013. Available from: https://doi.org/nrhm.gov.in/images/pdf/programmes/child–health/annualreport/Two_Year_Progress_of_SNCUs–A_Brief_Report_(2011-12_&_2012-13).pdf
The World Bank. World Development Indicators 2015. Available from: https://doi.org/data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.CBRT.IN. Accessed December 15, 2016.
National Neonatology Forum of India. Evidence Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. New Delhi, 2010 [updated October 2010.] Available from: https://doi.org/nnfi.org. Accessed August 30, 2016.
Gilbert C, Shukla R, Kumar R, Khera A, Murthy GV. Services for the detection and treatment of retinopathy of prematurity in major Indian cities: The 11–City 9–State Study. Indian Pediatr. 2016;53(Suppl.2):S112–7.
World Health Organization. The ICF: An overview. 2010.
Sanghi G, Dogra M, Das P, Vinekar A, Gupta A, Dutta S. Aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity in Asian Indian babies: Spectrum of disease and outcome after laser treatment. Retina (Philadelphia). 2009;29:1335–9.
Sanghi G, Dogra MR, Katoch D, Gupta A. Demographic profile of infants with stage 5 retinopathy of prematurity in North India: Implications for screening. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2011;18:72–4.
Azad R CP, Gangwe A, Kumar V. Lack of screening underlies most Stage–5 retinopathy of prematurity among cases presenting to a tertiary eye center in India. Indian Pediatr. 2016;Suppl 2:S103–S6.
Zepeda–Romero LC, Meza–Anguiano A, Barrera–de Leon JC, Angulo–Castellanos E, Ramirez–Ortiz MA, Gutierrez–Padilla JA, et al. Case series of infants presenting with end stage retinopathy of prematurity to two tertiary eye care facilities in Mexico: Underlying reasons for late presentation. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19:1417–25.
Gilbert CE, Lepvrier–Chomette N. Gender Inequalities in Surgery for bilateral cataract among children in lowincome countries. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1245–51.
Reichman NE, Corman H, Noonan K. Impact of child disability on the family. Matern Child Health J. 2008;12:679–83.
Isa SN, Ishak I, Ab Rahman A, Mohd Saat NZ, Che Din N, Lubis SH, et al. Health and quality of life among the caregivers of children with disabilities: A review of literature. Asian J Psych. 2016;23:71–7.
Quinn GE1 DV, Saigal S, Phelps DL, Hardy RJ, Tung B, Summers CG, et al. CRYO–ROP Cooperative Group. Health–related quality of life at age 10 years in very lowbirth–weight children with and without threshold retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1659–66.
Furlong WJ, Feeny DH, Torrance GW, Barr RD. The Health Utilities Index (HUI) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies. Ann Med. 2001;33:375–84.
Vinekar A, Jayadev C, Dogra M, Shetty B. Improving follow–up of infants during retinopathy of prematurity screening in rural areas. Indian Pediatr. 2016;53: (Suppl.2):S151–4.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Govt of India. Operational Guidelines: Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram–Child Health Screening and Early Intervention Services under NRHM 2013. Available from: https://doi.org/pbnrhm.org/docs/rbsk_guidelines.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kulkarni, S., Gilbert, C., Zuurmond, M. et al. Blinding Retinopathy of Prematurity in Western India: Characteristics of Children, Reasons for Late Presentation and Impact on Families. Indian Pediatr 55, 665–670 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-018-1355-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-018-1355-8