Abstract
Debris-covered glaciers are common in the Himalayas and play a key role in understanding future regional water availability and management. Previous studies of regional glacial changes have often neglected debris-covered glaciers or have mixed them with debris-free glaciers. In this study, we generated a new glacier data set that includes debris-covered and debris-free glaciers to study the glacial surface area change in the Koshi River Basin in the central Himalayas. Long time-series Landsat data were used to extract the glacier boundaries using automatic and manual classification methods. The glacial area decreased by 10.4% from 1975 to 2010 at a rate of 0.30% a−1, with accelerated melting since 2000 (0.47% a−1). Small glaciers melted faster than large glaciers. In terms of distinctive glacier types, debris-free glaciers shrank at a rate of 0.45% a−1, faster than debris-covered glaciers (0.18% a−1), while debris-covered glaciers larger than 5.0 km2 retreated at a rate faster than debris-free glaciers of the same-sized group. We also studied the potential interactions between 222 supraglacial lakes and debris-covered glaciers. Debris-covered glaciers with glacial lakes melt faster than glaciers without lakes. This study can improve our understanding of the differences in the changes between debris-covered and debris-free glaciers in the central Himalayas and help evaluate water resource changes in the Himalayas.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Debris-covered glaciers are widely distributed in the central Himalayas (Rounce et al. 2015; Scherler et al. 2011; Steiner et al. 2015). For debris-covered glaciers, the terminus is covered by surface moraines, dust and pebbles, which play an important role in regulating the ablation rate (Collier et al. 2015; Mayer et al. 2010; Rowan et al. 2015). Growing glacial lakes and surface lowering indicate loss of mass on debris-covered glaciers (Bhambri et al. 2011; Qiao et al. 2015). Debris-covered glaciers account for a large proportion of the glacial surface area in many regions, and glacial area is an important indicator of changes in local glaciers (Pratap et al. 2015; Sakai and Fujita 2010). Glacial melt water is a major water source to the Himalayan region in China, Nepal and India and supports life and agricultural production in the surrounding areas (Immerzeel et al. 2010). Changes in debris-covered glaciers are a key factor in assessing the future regional water availability and management (Nagai et al. 2013). Therefore, it is important to understand the characteristics of debris-covered glaciers and their changes under global warming.
Glacial melting in the central Himalayas has been reported in previous studies (Bolch et al. 2012; Kääb et al. 2015; Yao et al. 2012). Most glaciers are in a rapidly retreating state; however, the changes in debris-covered glaciers remain unclear. Previous studies on glacial surface area changes in this region have often ignored debris-covered glaciers or have combined them with debris-free glaciers (Nie et al. 2010; Shangguan et al. 2014; Ye et al. 2009). Studies focusing on debris-covered glaciers are primarily limited to field investigations and the establishment of energy balance models to assess glacial changes (Fujita and Sakai 2014; Pellicciotti et al. 2015). The complex properties of the glacier itself and the requirements of the various parameters in the models have limited the assessment of large-scale changes in debris-covered glaciers (Rounce et al. 2015). Remote sensing could offer an effective way to study the spatial and temporal changes in debris-covered glaciers (Basnett et al. 2013; Qiao et al. 2015). Bolch et al. (2008) used multi-temporal space imagery to study four debris-covered glaciers of approximately 92 km2 in the Khumbu Himalayas, Nepal, south of Qomolangma, and showed that these four glacial areas decreased by 5.3% from 1962 to 2005, with a retreat rate of 0.12% a−1. Based on a comparison of elevation data at different times, glaciers covering an area of 144 km2, including the debris-covered glaciers in the Rongbuk Catchment, China, north of Qomolangma lost mass at a rate of 0.47 ± 0.23 m water equivalent (w.e.) a−1 (Ye et al. 2015). These results indicate that the debris-covered glaciers are retreating in the central Himalayas. However, studies on changes in debris-covered glacier at the basin scale remain limited and the range of previous studied in this region is small.
Previous studies discussed the factors influencing the changes in debris-covered glacier and compared the change rate between the debris-covered glaciers and debris-free glaciers (Buri et al. 2016; Juen et al. 2014). One study of changes in debris-covered glacier in the Himalayas suggests that the debris cover causes insulating effects with respect to surface melting, resulting in slower melting rates than debris-free glaciers and delaying the response of the glaciers to a warming climate (Banerjee 2017). Over time, the melting rates of debris-covered glaciers become similar to or even faster than those of debris-free glaciers due to the longer response time. Some studies have also shown that melting of ice cliffs or the thickness of debris-covered ice can significantly influence the surface ablation of generally debris-covered glaciers (Bolch et al. 2011; Buri et al. 2016; Reid and Brock 2014). Meanwhile, the mechanism of glacial changes with respect to supraglacial lakes can be more directly monitored. Studies have shown that the formation of supraglacial lakes may cause large surface areas of glacier melting, even if the glacier has a thick debris cover (Basnett et al. 2013; Benn et al. 2012). Supraglacial lakes change the stress state of the glacier’s surface. The thermal energy storage in the lakes warms the surface ice and leads to internal ablation (Sakai et al. 2000). The melting rate around lakes is usually one or two orders of magnitude higher than the sub-debris melting rates; therefore, the process of supraglacial lake expansion accelerates the overall rates of glacial area loss (Benn et al. 2012; Sakai and Fujita 2010). The continual melting of debris-covered glaciers causes the expansion of supraglacial lakes and can result in glacial lake outburst floods (Benn et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2015). Relative to other glacial lake disasters, the ponding on debris-covered glaciers can form larger supraglacial lakes and generate more serious hazards (Rathore et al. 2015). Therefore, investigating the conditions of the supraglacial lakes is necessary to evaluate surface area changes in debris-covered glaciers.
Our aim is to study the surface area change of debris-covered and debris-free glaciers in the Koshi River Basin, central Himalayas, from 1975 to 2010. We focus on the differences in the surface area change rates between these two types of glaciers from 1975 to 2010 in different time periods and present a new data set including the area of these glaciers. In addition, we also study the distribution of supraglacial lakes on debris-covered glaciers and the interaction between supraglacial lakes and glacier retreat.
Study area
The Koshi River is one of the main tributaries of the Ganges. Its drainage basin, located in the central Himalayas, covers the latitudes of 26°51′–29°08′ N and the longitudes of 85°20′–88°57′ E, with an area of approximately 57,713 km2 (Fig. 1). The Koshi River Basin is composed of three sub-basins, i.e., the Sun Kosi River, the Pumqu-Arun River and Tamur Kosi River sub-basins. The basin is surrounded by ridges that separate it from the Yarlung Zangbo River to the north, the Gandaki River to the west and the Mahananda River to the east. The highest elevation is 8844 m (the peak of Mt. Qomolangma), and the average elevation is 3870 m. There are more than 3000 km2 glaciers in this basin, including the debris-covered and debris-free glaciers (Fig. 2), according to the Randolph Glacier Inventory (RGI) (Pfeffer et al. 2014). The Koshi River Basin is the pathway of marine water vapor to the Tibetan Plateau and is influenced by warm, moist air flowing off the Indian Ocean (Yao et al. 2012). The meteorological data from the Tingri and Nyalam stations were used to study the climate change in the Koshi River Basin (Fig. 1).
Data and methods
Data
Landsat satellite data are widely used to create glacier inventories in many regions of the world (Frey et al. 2012; Gardent et al. 2014; Guo et al. 2015). This study used these data as the main data source to extract glacier outlines. The data have a long time series (from the early 1970s to the present) and can be freely accessed from the United States Geological Survey Web site (http://www.usgs.gov/), therefore forming an ideal data set to monitor glacial change. A total of 76 images, including the Landsat Multispectral Scanner (MSS, resolution 60 m), Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM, resolution 30 m) and Landsat Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+, resolution 30 m), were used here to study the glacier status in 1975, 2000 and 2010 (Table 1). The 1975 data were used as the initial glacier status for comparison, and the 10-year scale between 2000 and 2010 can reflect the changes in various types of glaciers for the long time series. The lack of presentations of the glacier status in the 1990s is due to the deficient high quality of the data required available from 1990s. We also used topographic maps as reference for the relatively low-resolution and less well-archived Landsat MSS data from the 1970s. Sixty-eight 1:50,000 and three 1:100,000 topographic maps produced by the National Geomatics Center of China (NGCC) were used; these maps were constructed from the aerial photography in 1975.
Methods
The flowchart for extracting the glacial boundaries is shown in Fig. 3. The glacier types are determined using RGI, which is facilitated by visual interpretation. The RGI is a globally complete collection of digital outlines of glaciers (Pfeffer et al. 2014). In the Koshi River Basin, RGI data for glaciers in China are derived from the second Chinese glacier inventory, which contains the glacier types with respective attributes. The manual visual interpretation is superimposed by the glacier vector data on the false color composite image (red = band 5; green = band 4; blue = band 3; RGB) for interpretation in TM/ETM+ data.
The mapping of the debris-free glaciers includes automatic classification and manual correction. Automatic classification is based on the band ratio method, which is simple and robust for clean ice. The band ratio in this study used the red band divided by shortwave infrared (SWIR) band (bands 3 and 5, respectively, in Landsat TM and ETM+) with a threshold range of 1.9–2.1. The threshold is used to determine whether the pixel is clean ice or not, by comparing the pixel values from the results of the band ratio. Typical thresholds for band ratio methods are in the range of 2.0 ± 0.5 range (Paul et al. 2015). Because the optimal threshold depends partly on the local atmospheric conditions, we relied on repetitive experiments with glacier boundaries extracted via manual identification and the reference data provided by the RGI to determine a suitable threshold for this study. In the case of data differences, we used a threshold of 2.0 as a first benchmark and increased or decreased this threshold to check the quality of the generated glacier boundary before finally deciding on the proper threshold to apply. Manual interpretation is still necessary after automatic classification, because manual correction can help to edit glacial outlines that might be incorrectly classified due to turbid water, shadows and seasonal snow. Glacial status was identified manually in 1975 because of the lack of the SWIR band in the MSS data. The false color composite image in this period followed the order of bands 4, 3 and 2 (RGB).
The outline of a debris-covered glacier is composed of two sections: clean ice and debris-covered ice. The mapping methods for the clean ice are the same as those for debris-free glaciers. The boundary of the debris-covered ice was extracted based on visual interpretation combined with auxiliary data from a digital elevation model (DEM) and thermal data (Janke et al. 2015; Racoviteanu and Williams 2012). Debris-covered ice generally exists on the glacier at low slope angles. Figure 4a shows the slope of the study area. Previous studies have usually chosen 20° as the slope threshold for the extraction of debris-covered ice in the Himalayan region (Bolch et al. 2007; Shukla et al. 2010). However, to ensure that debris-covered ice is not removed prematurely (Smith et al. 2015), we use 24° in this study as the threshold for the maximum slope. Because the ice is covered by the debris above and connected to the upstream glacier, the temperature of the debris-covered ice is lower than that of the surrounding rock. From the Landsat thermal infrared band (resolution 60 m), we observed that the values (pixel brightness) of the debris-covered ice were less than 70 and those of the rock were higher than 100 (Fig. 4b). Note that the thresholds for the thermal data are independent because the data acquisition environment is different. We then used manual visual interpretation with false color composite images to delineate the boundaries of the debris-covered ice (Fig. 4c).
We also examined glacial lakes related to debris-covered glaciers, including supraglacial and marginal glacial lakes. Glacial lakes with surface area greater than 0.01 km2 were included in this study. The Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) method is widely used to extract lake water boundaries (Jawak and Luis 2015; Singh et al. 2014). This algorithm is based on an arithmetic operation on the green band and near-infrared (NIR) band (i.e., bands 2 and 4, respectively, of the Landsat TM/ETM+ data) with the formula of (green − NIR)/(green + NIR). The NDWI value ranges from − 1 to 1, and the threshold is 0. A pixel is water if NDWI > 0 and non-water if NDWI < 0 (Mcfeeters 1996). The lake boundaries were also edited manually after automatic classification.
Error estimation for the glacier boundary
Errors in the glacier boundary measurement (Eb) were primarily derived from the registration error (Er), glacial delineation error (Em) and image quality error (Eq) and were calculated using Eq. (1) (Wang et al. 2011; Yao et al. 2012):
The registration error (Er) originates from the resolution of the data and the accuracy of the data registration. Er is the ratio of the sum of the uncertainty error in all images (Ua) relative to the total glacial area. According to previous studies (Hall et al. 2003), Eq. (2) can be used to calculate Ua.
In this equation, λ represents the spatial resolution of the data and σ stands for the adjustment error for each image. In this study, the adjustment error was < 0.2%.
The application of a band ratio method to mapping glaciers introduces an error of ± 2% for debris-free glaciers (Bolch and Kamp 2006; Paul et al. 2002). Therefore, all the automatically generated glacier boundaries are manually corrected in this study. Even though the manual digitizations are considered ‘accurate’, there is an inherent error in any manual data. The glacial delineation error (Em) is primarily reliant on the operator’s experience in delineating glacier boundaries with respect to such factors as classifying shadow areas and perennial or seasonal snow. The image quality error (Eq) depends on the condition of the image at the time of acquisition, which is affected by seasonal snow and shadows (Paul et al. 2013). To measure Em and Eq, we employed a widely used buffer method to estimate the uncertainty (Bolch et al. 2010; Granshaw and Fountain 2006). Via detection and revision of the glacial boundaries, the approximate errors of the glacial boundaries were estimated for each period. Considering the complexity of debris-covered ice, we added a basic error of ± 0.5% for this type of glacier according to previous studies (Bolch et al. 2010 Paul et al. 2013).
Results and discussion
Changes in the number and surface area of glaciers
In this study, we found 1832 glaciers with a total area of 3464.7 ± 186.2 km2 with a mean area of 1.9 km2 in 1975 in the Koshi River Basin (Table 2). The number of glaciers in 2000 did not change relative to 1975; however, 21 glaciers disappeared from 2000 to 2010. The total area of the glaciers decreased by 209.7 km2 in the period from 1975 to 2000 and by 152.1 km2 in the period from 2000 to 2010. The shrinkage rate between 1975 and 2000 was 0.24% a−1, and this rate increased after 2000 to 0.47% a−1 between 2000 and 2010. The mean variation rate of the glacier area was − 0.30% a−1 between 1975 and 2010. All the glacier data are shown in the supplementary material.
The mean area of the debris-covered glaciers was 16.1 km2 in 1975, larger than that of the debris-free glaciers at 0.9 km2. The number of debris-covered glaciers was small relative to that of debris-free glaciers: 119 versus approximately 1713; however, the total area of the debris-covered glaciers was larger than that of the debris-free glaciers (1922.3 ± 107.6 vs. 1542.4 ± 78.7 km2 in 1975). The lost area from 1975 to 2010 was 118.1 km2 for debris-covered glaciers and 243.6 km2 for debris-free glaciers (Table 2). The variation rate was smaller for debris-covered glaciers than for debris-free glaciers between 1975 and 2010, with values of − 0.18 and − 0.45% a−1, respectively.
Changes in glaciers according to size
Figure 5 shows the classification by number and area of the glaciers. The glaciers were divided into six groups based on their sizes: 0.01–0.1, 0.1–0.5, 0.5–1.0, 1.0–5.0, 5.0–10.0, and ≥ 10.0 km2. In 2010, there were 1053 glaciers with an area smaller than 0.5 km2, which accounts for 58.1% of the total number of glaciers in this basin. However, their total area was 198.3 km2, which accounts for only 6.4% of the total glacial area. The number of glaciers larger than 10 km2 was 60, which was 3.3% of all the glaciers; however, their area was 1588.6 km2, representing 50.6% of the total glacier area. Debris-covered glaciers were larger glaciers with their areas primarily falling into the three larger-sized groups (i.e., 1.0–5.0, 5.0–10.0, and ≥ 10.0 km2). Only two debris-covered glaciers were smaller than 1.0 km2. The number (area) fraction of glaciers in these three size groups was 2.0% (3.8%), 1.4% (6.2%) and 3.0% (48.1%), respectively.
Figure 6 shows the changes in the number of glaciers in each size group between 1975 and 2010. Even though the total change in the number of glaciers was small, the composition of the different size groups represents a large change. The number of glaciers with an area between 0.01 and 0.1 km2 showed an increase from 220 in 1975 to 285 in 2000, while the numbers of glaciers in the other size groups all decreased. This indicates that large glaciers shrank into small glaciers during this period. From 2000 to 2010, the number of glaciers such small-scale glaciers (0.01–0.1 km2) continued to increase from 285 to 370, while the numbers of glaciers in the other size groups further decreased. The small-sized glaciers therefore changed more intensely than did the large-sized ones. In addition, the debris-covered glaciers were more stable than the debris-free glaciers.
The correlation between glacial variation rate and glacier area is shown in Fig. 7. The retreat rate of the glaciers from 1975 to 2000 in the six groups ranged from 0.17 to 0.85% a−1. From 2000 to 2010, the retreat rates for glaciers of all size groups ranged from 0.26 to 3.38% a−1. Small glaciers showed faster shrinkage rates than large glaciers.
Debris-covered and debris-free glacier changes were compared within each size group. From 1975 to 2000, the retreat rates of debris-covered glaciers in the size groups of 1.0–5.0, 5.0–10.0, and ≥ 10.0 km2 were 0.10, 0.23 and 0.17% a−1, respectively, while the retreat rates of debris-free glaciers in the same size groups were 0.35, 0.19 and 0.13% a−1, respectively. From 2000 to 2010, the glacier area in those aforementioned size groups clearly decreased at rates of 0.19, 0.39 and 0.26% a−1, respectively, for debris-covered glaciers and at rates of 0.65, 0.35 and 0.20% a−1, respectively, for debris-free glaciers.
These results show that debris-covered and debris-free glaciers respond differently to climate change. For glaciers within the same size groups, the debris-covered glaciers retreated faster than the debris-free glaciers within the size groups of 5–10.0 and ≥ 10.0 km2, but retreated more slowly within the size group of 1.0–5.0 km2. This pattern indicates that the area loss of debris-covered glaciers is affected by the glacial size groups.
Our results show that glaciers melted rapidly in this basin, in agreement with previous studies (Shangguan et al. 2014; Ye et al. 2015). Field observational records for two glaciers in this basin, AX010 and Kangwure, showed substantial mass losses with high loss rates of 810 and 660 kg m−2 a−1, respectively, from 2005 to 2009 (Fujita and Nuimura 2011; Ma et al. 2010). Our results for these two glaciers also revealed rapid retreat, with area loss rates of 1.07–0.83% a−1 from 1975 to 2010. However, these two glaciers are debris-free glaciers, and they had small areas. Continuous observational data for the debris-covered glaciers or larger glaciers are still lacking in this basin, and more field investigations are required in future studies.
Considerable work has been done studying glacial changes in the Koshi River Basin based on remote sensing (Table 3). Jin et al. (2005) surveyed glacier changes in the Pumqu Basin where the glacier area decreased by 9.0% (0.29% a−1) from 1970 to 2001. Ye et al. (2009) found an area decrease of 10.4% in the Qomolangma region with a recession rate of 0.30% a−1 from 1974 to 2008. Similar work was conducted in the Qomolangma Nature Reserve, where the glacier decreased by 15.6% (0.52% a−1) from 1976 to 2006 (Nie et al. 2010). Bajracharya et al. (2011) studied the glacier change in the Koshi River Basin in Nepal where the area recession was 0.41% a−1 (16.3%) from 1970 to 2010. Considering the differences between these studies (e.g., different time periods, study areas, and glacier types), these results cannot be easily compared to each other. However, they all reflect rapid glacier retreat trend in the region, which is consistent with our study.
The relationship between supraglacial lakes and debris-covered glaciers
We mapped a total of 222 supraglacial lakes (consisting of 200 supraglacial lakes and 22 marginal supraglacial lakes) related to debris-covered glaciers in 2010 (Fig. 8). Debris-covered glaciers with lakes account for the majority of the glaciers within the two size groups of 5.0–10.0 km2 (65.3%) and ≥ 10.0 km2 (81.4%), thus dooming for lake expansion under global warming. The areas of the supraglacial lakes range from 0.01 to 4.9 km2, and total 29.7 km2. It is difficult to track supraglacial lake variations because they are small and may experience seasonal fluctuations. Therefore, we examined the marginal supraglacial lakes, which are more stable in different periods. The total area of marginal supraglacial lakes was 9.5 km2 in 1975 and increased to 24.2 km2 in 2010. The annual area change was 0.38 km2 a−1 from 1975 to 2000 and increased to 0.52 km2 a−1 from 2000 to 2010, which is consistent with increasing glacier retreat. This indicates that the marginal lakes expanded faster in the last decade, an acceleration that is likely due to glacier melting.
The surface area change rates of debris-covered glaciers with glacial lakes (including supraglacial and marginal supraglacial lakes) and glaciers without supraglacial lakes were compared. From 1975 to 2010, the retreat rates of debris-covered glaciers in the size groups of 1.0–5.0, 5.0–10.0, and ≥ 10.0 km2 were 0.14, 0.27 and 0.20% a−1, respectively, while the retreat rates of glaciers without supraglacial lakes were 0.11, 0.22 and 0.16% a−1, respectively. Therefore, independent of glacial size, the areas of debris-covered glaciers with glacial lakes decreased faster than those without supraglacial lakes (Table 4).
Controlling factors of glacier change
Glacier changes represent a complex response to climate change under the control of multiple factors (such as glacial sizes and types) (Nagai et al. 2013; Pratap et al. 2015). Even though various models have been proposed to explain these responses, the mechanism remains elusive and requires further study to clarify glacier change features (Rounce et al. 2015).
In this study, the glacier area loss showed a strong feature: The retreat rate is faster for smaller glaciers than for larger glaciers of all glacier types (including debris-covered and debris-free glaciers). Comparing the glacial change rates in the two periods (1975–2000 vs. 2000–2010), the retreat rates of glaciers of all size groups have increased in the past 10 years; however, the retreat rates of small glaciers have increased faster than those of larger glaciers. These results suggest that glacier area in this region is one of the main factors affecting glacial change. This phenomenon is consistent with many other studies of mountain glacial changes (Paul and Andreassen 2009; Paul and Svoboda 2010).
Based on the overall view of glacier changes, debris-covered glaciers retreat more slowly than debris-free glaciers, in terms of both retreat rate and area loss. One reason is the existence of a large number of debris-free glaciers in the basin, which are small in size but retreat quickly. In comparison, the thick debris cover on the ice prevents heat conduction at the glacier surface, and, therefore, hinders melting and reduces the mobility of the glacier’s tongue, thereby delaying glacier retreat (Scherler et al. 2011). To examine the interference of the different glacial sizes on the glacial variations, we analyzed the variation rates of different types of glaciers by glacial size. The retreat rates of debris-covered glaciers are much lower than those of debris-free glaciers within the size range of 1.0–5.0 km2, implying that the debris cover has likely reduced the glacier retreat of the small glaciers in this basin. For large debris-covered glaciers, however, the retreat rates are much faster than those of debris-free glaciers. In this case, the debris cover may play the opposite role in glacier melting; however, the actual cause of this requires further study.
Our study shows that the debris-covered glaciers with glacial lakes decreased faster than those without lakes. Further analysis reveals that debris-covered glaciers without lakes had a lower loss rate than debris-free glaciers within the size groups of 5–10.0 and ≥ 10.0 km2 in the study period. The results show that the influence of lakes affects glacier changes via the debris-covered ice, which may explain the differences in the responses of debris-covered glaciers of different sizes to climate change.
To evaluate the effects of climate changes on the glacier area change, we analyzed the annual mean temperature and precipitation between 1971 and 2010 from the Nyalam and Tingri meteorological stations (Fig. 9). The nonparametric Mann–Kendall test was used to detect statistical trends in the meteorological variables (Table 5). This test can identify a trend without assumptions about the data distribution and less influenced by the presence of outliers (Mann 1945). The Z value determines the sign of the trend, and positive (negative) Z values indicate an upward (downward) trend (Yenilmez et al. 2011).
The results of the test show a clearly positive trend in the annual temperature from 1971 to 2010. In the last 10 years, the temperature increase was more obvious than the precipitation and coincided with glacier area loss in the Koshi River Basin. During the study period, the glacier area in this region retreated continuously and the retreat rates accelerated after the year 2000. The precipitation remained stable from 1971 to 2010 and appeared slightly decreased from 2000 to 2010. The precipitation pattern in this region is related to the Indian monsoon activity. The weakening trend of the Indian monsoon in recent years has led to a decrease in snow accumulation (Kaspari et al. 2008; Naidu et al. 2009).
Therefore, rising temperature is the main reason behind the continued glacier melting in the region. In addition, the expansion of the supraglacial lakes may be primarily due to the continuous melting of the glaciers, while the growth of lakes also enhances glacier ablation.
Our research has advanced our understanding of the differences in the surface area changes of different types of glaciers in the Koshi River Basin. The complex mechanisms behind these phenomena require not only continuous monitoring with additional remote sensing techniques from multiple perspectives (e.g., surface velocity and elevation change), but also the application of models to simulate and predict the glacier changes.
Conclusions
In 2010, the Koshi River Basin in the central Himalayas contained 1811 glaciers with a total area of 3103.0 ± 123.9 km2, 119 of which were debris-covered glaciers that comprised 58.1% of the total area. The rate of retreat in glacier area increased from 0.24 to 0.47% a−1 during the period between 1975–2000 and 2000–2010. The retreat rate of debris-covered glaciers was 0.18% a−1 between 1975 and 2010, slower than that of the debris-free glaciers (0.45% a−1).
All the glaciers in the Koshi River Basin have shown accelerated melting in the last decade, and small glaciers melted faster than large glaciers. The retreat rates of debris-covered glaciers were greater than those of debris-free glaciers of the same size groups (i.e., 5.0–10.0 and ≥ 10.0 km2). The accelerated shrinkage of glaciers may contribute to the expansion of marginal and supraglacial lakes, which in turn enhances the ablation of debris-covered glaciers.
References
Bajracharya SR, Maharjan SB, Shrestha F (2011) Glaciers shrinking in Nepal Himalaya. In: Climate change: geophysical foundations and ecological effects, pp 445–458
Banerjee A (2017) Brief communication: thinning of debris-covered and debris-free glaciers in a warming climate. Cryosphere 11:133–138. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-133-2017
Basnett S, Kulkarni AV, Bolch T (2013) The influence of debris cover and glacial lakes on the recession of glaciers in Sikkim Himalaya, India. J Glaciol 59:1035–1046. https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG12J184
Benn DI, Bolch T, Hands K, Gulley J, Luckman A, Nicholson LI, Quincey D, Thompson S et al (2012) Response of debris-covered glaciers in the Mount Everest region to recent warming, and implications for outburst flood hazards. Earth Sci Rev 114:156–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.03.008
Bhambri R, Bolch T, Chaujar RK (2011) Mapping of debris-covered glaciers in the Garhwal Himalayas using ASTER DEMs and thermal data. Int J Remote Sens 32:8095–8119. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.532821
Bolch T, Kamp U (2006) Glacier mapping in high mountains using DEMs, Landsat and ASTER data. Grazer Schriften der Geographie und Raumforschung 41:37–48
Bolch T, Buchroithner MF, Kunert A, Kamp U (2007) Automated delineation of debris-covered glaciers based on ASTER data. In: Geoinformation in Europe. Proceedings of the 27th EARSeL symposium, pp 4–6
Bolch T, Buchroithner M, Pieczonka T, Kunert A (2008) Planimetric and volumetric glacier changes in the Khumbu Himal, Nepal, since 1962 using Corona, Landsat TM and ASTER data. J Glaciol 54:592–600. https://doi.org/10.3189/002214308786570782
Bolch T, Yao T, Kang S, Buchroithner MF, Scherer D, Maussion F, Huintjes E, Schneider C (2010) A glacier inventory for the western Nyainqentanglha Range and the Nam Co Basin, Tibet, and glacier changes 1976–2009. Cryosphere 4:419–433. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-419-2010
Bolch T, Pieczonka T, Benn D (2011) Multi-decadal mass loss of glaciers in the Everest area (Nepal Himalaya) derived from stereo imagery. Cryosphere 5:349–358
Bolch T, Kulkarni A, Kaab A, Huggel C, Paul F, Cogley JG, Frey H, Kargel JS et al (2012) The state and fate of Himalayan glaciers. Science 336:310–314. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215828
Buri P, Pellicciotti F, Steiner JF, Miles ES, Immerzeel WW (2016) A grid-based model of backwasting of supraglacial ice cliffs on debris-covered glaciers. Ann Glaciol 57:199–211. https://doi.org/10.3189/2016AoG71A059
Collier E, Maussion F, Nicholson LI, Mölg T, Immerzeel WW, Bush ABG (2015) Impact of debris cover on glacier ablation and atmosphere–glacier feedbacks in the Karakoram. Cryosphere 9:1617–1632. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1617-2015
Frey H, Paul F, Strozzi T (2012) Compilation of a glacier inventory for the western Himalayas from satellite data: methods, challenges, and results. Remote Sens Environ 124:832–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.06.020
Fujita K, Nuimura T (2011) Spatially heterogeneous wastage of Himalayan glaciers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:14011–14014. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1106242108
Fujita K, Sakai A (2014) Modelling runoff from a Himalayan debris-covered glacier. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:2679–2694. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2679-2014
Gardent M, Rabatel A, Dedieu J-P, Deline P (2014) Multitemporal glacier inventory of the French Alps from the late 1960s to the late 2000s. Glob Planet Change 120:24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2014.05.004
Granshaw FD, Fountain AG (2006) Glacier change (1958–1998) in the North Cascades National Park Complex, Washington, USA. J Glaciol 52:251–256. https://doi.org/10.3189/172756506781828782
Guo W, Liu S, Xu J, Wu L, Shangguan D, Yao X, Wei J, Bao W et al (2015) The second Chinese glacier inventory: data, methods and results. J Glaciol 61:357–372. https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J209
Hall DK, Bayr KJ, Schöner W, Bindschadler RA, Chien JYL (2003) Consideration of the errors inherent in mapping historical glacier positions in Austria from the ground and space (1893–2001). Remote Sens Environ 86:566–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-4257(03)00134-2
Immerzeel WW, van Beek LP, Bierkens MF (2010) Climate change will affect the Asian water towers. Science 328:1382–1385. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183188
Janke JR, Bellisario AC, Ferrando FA (2015) Classification of debris-covered glaciers and rock glaciers in the Andes of central Chile. Geomorphology 241:98–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.03.034
Jawak SD, Luis AJ (2015) A rapid extraction of water body features from antarctic coastal oasis using very high-resolution satellite remote sensing data. Aquat Procedia 4:125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.018
Jin R, Li X, Che T, Wu L, Mool P (2005) Glacier area changes in the Pumqu river basin, Tibetan Plateau, between the 1970s and 2001. J Glaciol 51:607–610. https://doi.org/10.3189/172756505781829061
Juen M, Mayer C, Lambrecht A, Han H, Liu S (2014) Impact of varying debris cover thickness on ablation: a case study for Koxkar Glacier in the Tien Shan. Cryosphere 8:377–386. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-377-2014
Kääb A, Treichler D, Nuth C, Berthier E (2015) Brief Communication: contending estimates of 2003–2008 glacier mass balance over the Pamir–Karakoram–Himalaya. Cryosphere 9:557–564. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-557-2015
Kaspari S, Hooke RL, Mayewski PA, Kang S, Hou S, Qin D (2008) Snow accumulation rate on Qomolangma (Mount Everest), Himalaya: synchroneity with sites across the Tibetan Plateau on 50–100 year timescales. J Glaciol 54:343–352
Ma L, Tian L, Pu J, Wang P (2010) Recent area and ice volume change of Kangwure Glacier in the middle of Himalayas. Chin Sci Bull 55:2088–2096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-010-3211-7
Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13:245–259
Mayer C, Lambrecht A, Mihalcea C, Belò M, Diolaiuti G, Smiraglia C, Bashir F (2010) Analysis of glacial meltwater in Bagrot Valley, Karakoram. Mt Res Dev 30:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd-journal-d-09-00043.1
Mcfeeters SK (1996) The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. Int J Remote Sens 17:1425–1432
Nagai H, Fujita K, Nuimura T, Sakai A (2013) Southwest-facing slopes control the formation of debris-covered glaciers in the Bhutan Himalaya. Cryosphere 7:1303–1314. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1303-2013
Naidu CV, Durgalakshmi K, Krishna KM, Rao SR, Satyanarayana GC, Lakshminarayana P, Rao LM (2009) Is summer monsoon rainfall decreasing over India in the global warming era? J Geophys Res Atmos 114:144–153
Nie Y, Zhang Y, Liu L, Zhang J (2010) Glacial change in the vicinity of Mt. Qomolangma (Everest), central high Himalayas since 1976. J Geogr Sci 20:667–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-010-0803-8
Paul F, Andreassen LM (2009) A new glacier inventory for the Svartisen region, Norway, from Landsat ETM+ data: challenges and change assessment. J Glaciol 55:607–618
Paul F, Svoboda F (2010) A new glacier inventory on southern Baffin Island, Canada, from ASTER data: II. Data analysis, glacier change and applications. Ann Glaciol 50:22–31
Paul F, Huggel C, Kääb A, Kellenberger T, Maisch M (2002) Comparison of TM-derived glacier areas with higher resolution data sets. EARSeLeProc 2(1):15–21
Paul F, Barrand NE, Baumann S, Berthier E, Bolch T, Casey K, Frey H, Joshi SP et al (2013) On the accuracy of glacier outlines derived from remote-sensing data. Ann Glaciol 54:171–182. https://doi.org/10.3189/2013AoG63A296
Paul F, Bolch T, Kääb A, Nagler T, Nuth C, Scharrer K, Shepherd A, Strozzi T et al (2015) The glaciers climate change initiative: methods for creating glacier area, elevation change and velocity products. Remote Sens Environ 162:408–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.043
Pellicciotti F, Stephan C, Miles E, Herreid S, Immerzeel WW, Bolch T (2015) Mass-balance changes of the debris-covered glaciers in the Langtang Himal, Nepal, from 1974 to 1999. J Glaciol 61:373–386. https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG13J237
Pfeffer WT, Arendt AA, Bliss A, Bolch T, Cogley JG, Gardner AS, Hagen J-O, Hock R et al (2014) The Randolph Glacier Inventory: a globally complete inventory of glaciers. J Glaciol 60:537–552. https://doi.org/10.3189/2014JoG13J176
Pratap B, Dobhal DP, Mehta M, Bhambri R (2015) Influence of debris cover and altitude on glacier surface melting: a case study on Dokriani Glacier, central Himalaya, India. Ann Glaciol 56:9–16. https://doi.org/10.3189/2015AoG70A971
Qiao L, Mayer C, Liu S (2015) Distribution and interannual variability of supraglacial lakes on debris-covered glaciers in the Khan Tengri-Tumor Mountains, Central Asia. Environ Res Lett 10:014014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/014014
Racoviteanu A, Williams MW (2012) Decision tree and texture analysis for mapping debris-covered glaciers in the Kangchenjunga Area, Eastern Himalaya. Remote Sens 4:3078–3109. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4103078
Rathore B, Singh S, Brahmbhatt R, Bahuguna I, Rajawat A (2015) Monitoring of moraine-dammed lakes: a remote sensing-based study in the Western Himalaya. Curr Sci 109:1843–1849
Reid TD, Brock BW (2014) Assessing ice-cliff backwasting and its contribution to total ablation of debris-covered Miage glacier, Mont Blanc massif, Italy. J Glaciol 60:3–13. https://doi.org/10.3189/2014JoG13J045
Rounce DR, Quincey DJ, McKinney DC (2015) Debris-covered glacier energy balance model for Imja-Lhotse Shar Glacier in the Everest region of Nepal. Cryosphere 9:2295–2310
Rowan AV, Egholm DL, Quincey DJ, Glasser NF (2015) Modelling the feedbacks between mass balance, ice flow and debris transport to predict the response to climate change of debris-covered glaciers in the Himalaya. Earth Planet Sci Lett 430:427–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.09.004
Sakai A, Fujita K (2010) Formation conditions of supraglacial lakes on debris-covered glaciers in the Himalaya. J Glaciol 56:177–181. https://doi.org/10.3189/002214310791190785
Sakai A, Takeuchi N, Fujita K, Nakawo M (2000) Role of supraglacial ponds in the ablation process of a debris-covered glacier in the Nepal Himalayas. IAHS Publication, Wallingford, pp 119–132
Scherler D, Bookhagen B, Strecker MR (2011) Spatially variable response of Himalayan glaciers to climate change affected by debris cover. Nat Geosci 4:156–159. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1068
Shangguan D, Liu SY, Ding YJ, Wu LZ, Deng W, Guo WQ, Wang Y, Xu JL et al (2014) Glacier changes in the Koshi River basin, central Himalaya, from 1976 to 2009, derived from remote-sensing imagery. Ann Glaciol 55:61–68
Shukla A, Gupta RP, Arora MK (2010) Delineation of debris-covered glacier boundaries using optical and thermal remote sensing data. Remote Sens Lett 1:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160903159316
Singh KV, Setia R, Sahoo S, Prasad A, Pateriya B (2014) Evaluation of NDWI and MNDWI for assessment of waterlogging by integrating digital elevation model and groundwater level. Geocarto Int 30:650–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2014.965757
Smith T, Bookhagen B, Cannon F (2015) Improving semi-automated glacier mapping with a multi-method approach: applications in central Asia. Cryosphere 9:1747–1759. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1747-2015
Steiner JF, Pellicciotti F, Buri P, Miles ES, Immerzeel WW, Reid TD (2015) Modelling ice-cliff backwasting on a debris-covered glacier in the Nepalese Himalaya. J Glaciol 61:889–907. https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J194
Wang W, Yao T, Yang X (2011) Variations of glacial lakes and glaciers in the Boshula mountain range, southeast Tibet, from the 1970s to 2009. Ann Glaciol 52:9–17. https://doi.org/10.3189/172756411797252347
Wang W, Xiang Y, Gao Y, Lu A, Yao T (2015) Rapid expansion of glacial lakes caused by climate and glacier retreat in the Central Himalayas. Hydrol Process 29:859–874. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10199
Yao T, Thompson L, Yang W, Yu W, Gao Y, Guo X, Yang X, Duan K et al (2012) Different glacier status with atmospheric circulations in Tibetan Plateau and surroundings. Nat Clim Change 2:663–667. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1580
Ye Q, Zhong Z, Kang S, Stein A, Wei Q, Liu J (2009) Monitoring glacier and supra-glacier lakes from space in Mt. Qomolangma region of the Himalayas on the Tibetan Plateau in China. J Mt Sci 6:211–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-009-1016-4
Ye Q, Bolch T, Naruse R, Wang Y, Zong J, Wang Z, Zhao R, Yang D et al (2015) Glacier mass changes in Rongbuk catchment on Mt. Qomolangma from 1974 to 2006 based on topographic maps and ALOS PRISM data. J Hydrol 530:273–280
Yenilmez F, Keskin F, Aksoy A (2011) Water quality trend analysis in Eymir Lake, Ankara. Phys Chem Earth 36:135–140
Zhang G, Yao T, Xie H, Wang W, Yang W (2015) An inventory of glacial lakes in the Third Pole region and their changes in response to global warming. Glob Planet Change 131:148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.05.013
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41190081, 41401082, 41571061 and 41701069), the Strategic Priority Research Program (B) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB03030203) and the Major Special Project—The China High-Resolution Earth Observation System (30-Y30B13-9003-14/16-01). We would like to thank Dr. Xiaoxin Yang for the helpful comments on the earlier draft of this paper. We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and advices in improving the manuscript. We also thank the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) for providing Landsat data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xiang, Y., Yao, T., Gao, Y. et al. Retreat rates of debris-covered and debris-free glaciers in the Koshi River Basin, central Himalayas, from 1975 to 2010. Environ Earth Sci 77, 285 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7457-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7457-8