Abstract
Microbial and enzymatic degradation of keratin waste is more preferred over various conventional approaches which are costly and not environmentally suitable. Diverse niches are auspicious for the discovery of new microorganisms. To discover novel keratinolytic bacteria, 60 isolates from different poultry dumping sites were initially screened, and among these found a potent keratinolytic isolate (NKSP-7) that displayed higher feather-degrading ability. The selected isolate was identified as Bacillus sp. NKSP-7 based on 16S rDNA sequencing as well as physiochemical and morphological characteristics. The strain NKSP-7 showed complete hydrolysis of native chicken feathers (10 g/L) in nutrient medium after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C under agitation (150 rev/min) and produced thermostable extracellular keratinase. The crude enzyme displayed maximal keratinolytic activity (34.7 U/mL) in phosphate buffer of pH 7.0, and at 60 °C using keratin azure as a substrate. Keratinolytic enzyme showed stability at 20–65 °C for 4 h over the pH range of 5.5–8.0. No obvious inhibitory influence was perceived by cations, organic solvents, EDTA, and detergents. Whereas, enzyme activity was enhanced by adding β-mercaptoethanol, Na+, Cd2+, and Mn2+. All these notable features of keratinase make it a promising candidate for various industrial applications especially for dehairing process in leather industry, bioconversion of poultry waste, and in detergents formulations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Severe deficiency of protein resources and increase in demand for protein emphasize to rummage new-fangled and sustainable protein sources from different waste materials (keratinous wastes), and produce innovative functional materials in an eco-friendly way (Peng et al. 2019; Sharma and Devi 2018). Globally, millions of tons of keratinous wastes are generated from various processing industries (husbandry, herding, and poultry), which are the prevalent and abundant reservoir of pure keratin (Bhari et al. 2018). Management and recycling of these wastes have become one of the major environmental concerns due to the recalcitrant and complex structure of keratin (Tamreihao et al. 2019).
Keratin, a stubborn protein is pervasive and one of the most abundant biopolymers in nature, which is present in hair, scales, nail, feather, hooves, wool, and horns. These proteins are fibrous, insoluble, and structurally complex with excessive weak interactions like hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, and disulfide bridges, which make their molecular structure strong and resistant to the mechanical stress and the action of common proteolytic enzymes (pepsin, papain, or trypsin) (Gopinath et al. 2015; Ningthoujam et al. 2016). The high cysteine content and consequent disulfide bridges contribute to the stability and recalcitrant nature of keratin making it fairly resistant to degradation (Kshetri and Ningthoujam 2016).
Feathers are mainly constituted of keratin and account for about 5–7% of the total weight of a mature bird thereby producing considerable quantity of keratin-based poultry wastes that decomposed very slowly and thus, become a massive environmental concern (Ningthoujam et al. 2016). Feathers are the considerable source of amino acids, and minerals such as calcium (Ca), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), nitrogen (N), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), potassium (K), phosphorus (P), and zinc (Zn) (Tamreihao et al. 2019). Several conventional and non-conventional approaches such as steam pressure, burning, landfilling, and acid/alkali hydrolysis have been utilized, either alone or in combination for recycling of keratinous wastes to produce fertilizers, glues, and foodstuffs. These strategies not only require enormous energy for processing but also cause obvious pollution and resultantly some essential amino acids such as methionine, tryptophan, and lysine are destroyed (Cascarosa et al. 2012).
Keratinase (E.C.3.4.21/24/99.11) form a group of proteolytic enzyme able to hydrolyze insoluble keratins (feathers, wool, nail, and hair) more efficiently than other proteases (Kshetri and Ningthoujam 2016; Kurane and Attar 2017). Keratinases are predominately produced and active in the presence of keratinous substrate, and act on peptide bonds in keratin and convert it into simplified forms (Gopinath et al., 2015). These enzymes are omnipresent in nature and widely found in bacteria, actinomyces, and fungi especially dermatophytic species. Potent keratinolytic bacteria, mostly belonging to genus Bacillus, have been reported (Kshetri and Ningthoujam 2016; Sekar et al. 2016; Abdel-Fattah et al. 2018; Bhari et al. 2018). Other bacterial genera Chryseobacterium sp. (Brandelli 2005); Pseudomonas sp. (Tork et al. 2010); Staphylococcus aureus (Raju and Divakar 2013); and Amycolatopsis sp. Strain MBRL 40 (Ningthoujam et al. 2016) have also been reported as keratin decomposers.
Keratinolytic organisms and their specific proteolytic enzymes (keratinases) offer an alternatively conspicuous, eco-friendly, and economical approach for the proper degradation and recycling of keratinous waste materials into worthy byproducts (Sharma and Devi 2018). Owing to their diverse biotechnological implications and multifarious properties, keratinase can be considered as promising enzyme for the manufacturing of protein supplements, biomedical products, leather processing, cosmetic, fiber modification, animal nutrients, processing of feather-meal for bio-fertilizer and feed, detergent formulation, pharmaceutical industries, waste management, and bioremediation (Kshetri and Ningthoujam 2016; Bhari et al. 2018; Sharma and Devi 2018). In the recent time, the quest of efficient keratinolytic microorganism with high potential to hydrolyze keratin, has become the goal of research worldwide.
The present research work describes the isolation and screening of efficient keratinolytic bacteria from local poultry dump sites, and investigation of their ability to degrade biowaste (feathers) generated by poultry-processing industries. Hence, the best keratinolytic bacterium with highest chicken feather degradation ability in short period of time and optimal enzyme activity was identified by using various biochemical tests and 16S rRNA gene sequencing after which, preliminary characterization of crude keratinolytic enzyme from potent bacterial isolate (Bacillus sp. NKSP-7) was studied.
Materials and methods
Chemicals and reagents
All chemicals, media components, substrates, salts, and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St Louis, USA) and Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), unless otherwise mentioned. However, PCR components, gel extraction kit, DNA, and protein marker were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (USA).
Collection of samples
The soil samples were collected with the permission of responsible authorities from different chicken sale centers, poultry farms, and feather processing areas (dump sites) including Sajjad poultry farm (SPF) near Jallo Park, Jallo Park soil (JPS), local chicken sale centers (LCSC), Jallo Park hen cages (JPHC), compost sites of feathers waste at Jallo park (CSJP), poultry farm in Noor kot Shakkargarh (NKPF), poultry farm near Shahdara, Lahore (SHP), domestic waste of hens and feathers (DC) and chicken sale centers at Tollinton market (TWM), Lahore, Pakistan. All samples were collected in sterile plastic zip bags and then processed for the isolation of keratinolytic bacteria.
Preparation of feather meal powder
Feathers of chicken were procured from local poultry market and chicken sale centers. White chicken feathers were exhaustively washed with warm water followed by soaking them in a chloroform: methanol (1:1) mixture for 1 day and afterward in acetone: chloroform: methanol (1:4:3) mixture for 1 day. After that, feathers were washed many times with distilled water to remove all the residues of solvent, dried at 50 °C for overnight, and then milled using electrical blender, and stored at room temperature in a bottle until further used. Feather meal powder was used as a source of keratin substrate for the isolation of keratinase producing (feather degrading) bacteria (Tork et al. 2010). In contrast, for the production of keratinase enzyme only washed and sterilized whole feathers were used.
Isolation of keratinolytic bacteria
Keratinolytic bacteria were isolated from various poultry dumping sites of Lahore and its surrounding cities, Pakistan. Each soil sample (5 g) was mixed individually in 50 mL of sterile saline in Erlenmeyer’s flasks, and the resultant suspension was serially diluted (up to 10−9) followed by spreading on nutrient medium (Merck, Germany) agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Morphologically distinct bacterial colonies were streaked individually and maintained on nutrient medium agar slants until further use.
Screening of proteolytic bacteria
For screening of proteolytic bacterial strains, each isolate was inoculated on skimmed milk agar plates (2.8% v/v, skimmed milk in nutrient agar medium) and incubated at 37 °C for 1–2 days. The positive bacterial colonies with peak clear zones displayed hydrolytic ability were selected for further experiments.
Screening of keratinolytic bacteria
The keratinolytic ability of isolates was investigated by inoculating bacterial strains on feather-meal minimal salt medium (MSM) agar plates containing NaCl (0.05%, w/v), MgCl2.6H2O (0.01%, w/v), NH4Cl (0.05%, w/v), KH2PO4 (0.03%, w/v), K2HPO4 (0.04%, w/v), milled chicken feathers (1.0%, w/v), and bacteriological agar (1.5%, w/v), pH 7.5. After inoculation, the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 1–3 days. Bacterial colonies that developed clear zones by the hydrolysis of keratin were selected and purified by repeated streaking on same medium, and were finally maintained on nutrient agar slants.
Chicken feathers degradation by isolates
Isolated keratinolytic bacterial strains from agar slants were cultivated individually in 10 mL nutrient medium and kept at 37 °C for overnight in a rotary shaker. These cultures (1%, v/v) were used to inoculate 50 mL nutrient medium supplemented with 1% (w/v) of whole chicken feathers instead of feather powder (as a source of carbon and nitrogen) in Erlenmeyer’s flasks and incubated up to 96 h (4 days) at 30–50 °C, under agitation (50–200 rev/min). Percentage of keratin feather degradation was determined after regular interval of 6 h (Kurane and Attar, 2017). All flasks were also monitored visually and compared to the control flask (without inoculum). After incubation, the remaining feathers were filtered, washed, dried using pre-weighed filter paper, and weighed to calculate percentage degradation using following equation.
where, TWF is total weight of feathers and RWF is residual weight of feathers.
Keratinolytic bacterial isolates showing maximum feathers degradation were selected for further experimental studies.
Optimal production of keratinolytic enzyme
To evaluate the optimal conditions for keratinolytic enzyme production and feathers degradation, the selected keratinolytic isolates were cultivated (as described above) in nutrient medium containing 1% (w/v) chicken feathers and incubated at various temperatures ranging from 30 to 50 °C individually up to 96 h (4 days) in a rotary shaker (50–200 rev/min). The cultures were withdrawn after regular interval of 6 h to analyze the keratinase activity in extracellular, intracellular, and cell-bound fractions. After incubation and filtration of degrading content, the culture filtrate was harvested by centrifugation (10,000×g at 4 °C, 20 min), and the resultant culture supernatant was used as extracellular fraction. The pellet was washed with Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 8.0) and resuspended in the same buffer, sonicated (10 × 30 s bursts with 60 s intervals between successive pulses in a Ultra Sonicator, UP 400 s) to disrupt bacterial cells, and then centrifuged (10,000×g at 4 °C, 20 min). Supernatant was used as intracellular fraction, and the pellet (cell debris) was resuspended using same Tris-HCl buffer and used as cell-bound fraction. All cell fractions (soluble and insoluble) were assayed to determine the optimal keratinolytic activity.
Analytical approaches
The growth of keratinolytic bacterial culture was evaluated by the described method of Basar et al. (2010). To analyze the bacterial growth, regularly withdrawn samples (of 6 h) were subjected to centrifugation (10,000×g for 10 min, 4 °C), the resultant cell pellets were resuspended in sodium chloride (0.9%, w/v) and OD600nm (optical density) was measured. To scrutinize dry cell weight (DCW), cell suspensions were filtered using membrane filter and the retentate were dried in a preheated oven for 24 h at 80 °C. The relationship of OD and DCW was assessed from many experiments, which demonstrated that one unit (U) of OD600nm was approximately equivalent to 0.6 g DCW/L (Basar et al. 2010).
Enzyme activity assay
Keratinase enzyme activity was determined using keratin azure as substrate according to modified protocol of Cai et al. (2008). Keratin azure was frozen at − 40 °C for 4 h and subsequently ground into a fine powder. Powder keratin azure (5 mg) was suspended in 1 mL phosphate buffer (0.05 M, pH 7.0). Assay was conducted in triplicate by incubating reaction mixture that contained 1 mL crude enzyme and 1 mL keratin suspension at 60 °C for 2 h with constant agitation (150 rev/min). The reaction was stopped after incubation with the addition of 2 mL trichloroacetic acid (TCA, 10% w/v) and subsequently centrifugated (6000×g at 4 °C, 15 min) to remove substrate. The resultant supernatant was used to measure the release of azo dye at OD595nm against a control. A control test was also run along experimental reactions that contained only 1 mL keratin azure suspension. After incubation, 1 mL enzyme and 2 mL TCA (10%, w/v) were added in the control. One unit of keratinolytic enzyme activity was defined as an increase in absorbance of 0.01 per minute as compared to control under conditions described above.
Morphological and physiological characterization
Bacteria that displayed high production of keratinolytic enzymes were identified and characterized by different morphological and biochemical tests including colony morphology (color, shape, and size), Gram staining, endospore staining, motility test, methyl red test, indole test, oxidase test, nitrate reduction test, ureases test, gelatin hydrolysis test, catalase test, casein hydrolysis test, starch hydrolysis tests, carbohydrate fermentation (lactose, glucose, and sucrose), and hydrogen sulphide (H2S) production test according to Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology (Holt et al. 1994).
Molecular identification of potent isolates
The 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed for the identification and phylogenetic analysis of best keratinolytic isolates. Genomic DNA was isolated by phenol-chloroform method from the potent keratinolytic strains, and employed to amplify respective gene by PCR using a pair of primers, F-5′- AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′ and R-5’-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′. The amplification reaction mixture contained MgCl2 (25 mM), dNTP (2.5 mM), primers (10 pM each), reaction buffer (1X), genomic DNA (30–40 ng), Taq polymerase (1.5 U), and made the final volume with nuclease-free water. Optimal amplification conditions consisted of 1 cycle for 3 min at 95 °C (initial DNA denaturation); 30 cycles of 95 °C (1 min), 54 °C (1 min) and 72 °C (1 min), and final extension for 10 min at 72 °C. The amplified product was analyzed on agarose gel (0.8%, w/v) with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/mL) and purified using gene clean kit before being sent for sequencing. The sequence was compared and aligned using BLAST server to search homologous sequences available in GenBank database of NCBI and Clustal Omega.
Preliminary characterization of crude keratinase
Preliminary characterization of crude keratinolytic enzyme from the best bacterial isolate was studied using keratin azure as substrate.
Determination of molecular mass
The molecular mass of crude extracellular keratinase enzyme from potent isolate was determined by SDS-PAGE analysis. The concentration of protein was measured according to dye binding method using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard (Bradford 1976).
Effect of pH and various buffer system
To determine the best pH and buffer system for optimal activity of enzyme, various buffer systems of different pH were used including sodium acetate (pH 4.0–5.5), McIlvaine (pH 3.0–7.5), Tris-Cl (pH 7.0–9.0), HEPES [4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid] (pH 7.0–8.5), phosphate (pH 5.5–7.5), and CAPS [3-(cyclohexylamino)-1-propanasulfonic acid] (pH 9.0–11.0) buffers. The enzyme was diluted suitably in buffers from pH 3.0–11.0, with increment of 0.5 unit of pH, and incubated for 2 h at 60 °C with substrate. In order to study pH stability, crude keratinolytic enzyme was pre-incubated in different buffers (pH 3.0–11.0) for 4 h at 40 °C in McIlvaine (pH 3.0–5.0), phosphate (pH 5.5–7.5), HEPES (pH 7.0–8.5), and CAPS (pH 9.0–11.0), and then enzyme residual activity was assayed under described assay conditions.
Effect of temperature
The effect of temperature on keratinase catalytic efficiency was determined by incubating crude enzyme at temperature ranging from 20 to 100 °C (with increment of 5 °C) using phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). Thermal stability of crude keratinase was scrutinized by pre-incubating enzyme in the absence of substrate at temperature ranging from 20 to 85 °C for 4 h at pH 7.0 buffer, and residual activity was measured under optimal assay conditions.
Effect of various chemicals
The influence of various chemicals (metallic cations, surfactant, organic solvents and chemical reagents) on the catalytic efficiency of crude keratinase were studied by adding 10 mM cations (Ba2+, K1+, Na1+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, Hg2+, Mn2+, Ni2+, Pb2+, Cd2+, Co2+, Fe2+, and Zn2+), chelating agent (EDTA), β-mercaptoethanol, Tris, Urea, and 10 mg/mL surfactant (SDS, Triton X-100, and Tween-80) in the reaction mixture. Similarly, the effect of 50% (v/v) different organic solvents (acetone, isopropanol, acetonitrile, chloroform, ethanol, glycerol, ethyl acetate, n-butanol, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), dimethylformamide (DMF), and methanol) on enzyme were also investigated. All inhibitors were added individually in the reaction mixture and the enzyme activity was measured under described assay conditions (pH 7.0 and 60 °C). The activity without adding any additive was considered as 100%. All results were compiled as the percentage of relative activity.
Statistical analysis
All experimental tests (triplicates) were performed in CRD (completely randomized design); student’s t test and one-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) was used to statistically analyze all data. To study the comparison of means, Duncan’s multiple range test was applied using the SPSS (statistical package for the social sciences) software, after finding the significance results (p ≤ 0.05) of ANOVA.
Results
Isolation and screening of keratinolytic isolates
Initially, 135 bacterial strains were isolated but only 60 isolates exhibited proteolytic activity on skimmed-milk agar plate by producing clear zones, two best isolates showed maximum zones (Fig. S1a in supplementary material). These isolates were selected for secondary screening on feather-meal agar plates. Among 60 isolates, only 5 colonies (SPF-9, NKSP-7, NKSP-9, JPS-9, and SHP-5) showed highest clear zones (maximum keratinolytic activity) on feather-meal plates (Fig. S1b in supplementary material) as compared to others (Table 1).
Chicken feathers degradation by isolates
All bacterial isolates (60 strains) were evaluated individually for their capability to degrade white chicken feathers (keratin wastes). Some isolates exhibited noteworthy ability to degrade feathers, among which, 5 isolates (SPF-9, NKSP-7, NKSP-9, JPS-9, and SHP-5) showed more than 80% feather’s degradation after 24 h and 20 isolates revealed more than 60% of degradation whereas, some did not possess keratinolytic activity (Table 1). Among the most prominent 5 keratinolytic bacterial isolates, NKSP-7 and NKSP-9 (Fig. S2a and S2b in supplementary material) displayed 88.02 ± 0.021% (p ≤ 0.05) and 86.11 ± 0.401% (p ≤ 0.05) feathers’ degradation, respectively. However, almost all feather’s barbules and raches were degraded by inoculating NKSP-7 and NKSP-9 isolates (Fig. S2c in supplementary material) after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C under 150 rev/min.
Keratinolytic enzyme production and activity analysis
All 60 isolates were cultivated individually in nutrient broth medium supplement with 1% (w/v) feathers and incubated up to 96 h (4 days) at 30–50 °C temperature with shaking (50–200 rev/min). Some bacterial isolates have the ability to utilize chicken feathers as a nitrogen and carbon source, and keratinase enzyme was produced using an inexpensive substrate under submerged fermentation. Regularly withdrawn culture samples (6 h) were subjected to evaluate the activity of keratinase enzyme. Keratinolytic enzyme activity from isolates was observed in cell fractions such as extracellular (crude supernatant), cell-bound (cell pellet), and intracellular (lysis cells), but maximum enzyme activity was found in crude supernatant followed by intracellular and cell-bound fractions. Intracellular and cell-bound fractions exhibited 30–35% and 10–15% relative activity respectively as compared to the extracellular fraction that was considered as 100%.
Maximum feather degradation and extracellular keratinase enzyme production was observed when submerged fermentation was conducted using a potent keratinolytic isolate NKSP-7 that exhibited high extracellular keratinolytic activity (34.7 U/mL) and dry cell weight (8.76 g DCW/L), after 24 h of incubation with agitation (150 rev/min) at 37 °C which was considerably great than all other isolates (Table 1); therefore, NKSP-7 was selected for further experimental study.
Morphological and physiological characterization
Five SPF-9, NKSP-7, NKSP-9, JPS-9, and SHP-5 keratinolytic isolates were identified and characterized by different morphological, cultural, and biochemical tests. These isolates proved to be aerobic, motile, gram-positive, rod-shaped, and spore-forming bacilli (with central or sub-terminal endospore per cell). They formed creamy white circular colonies on feather-meal agar plate and were able to degrade chicken feather. While irregular, convex and mucoid colonies appeared on nutrient agar plate. They were also strong catalase and oxidase positive. The results demonstrated that these isolates were identified as the members of genus Bacillus. All cultural, morphological, biochemical, and physiological characteristics of these strains are summarized in Table 2.
Molecular identification of potent isolates
Among 5 isolates, the 2 best NKSP-7 and NKSP-9 strains were selected for molecular identification. The length of the obtained 16S rRNA gene amplicons was ~ 1.5 kb (Fig. S3 in supplementary material). The 16S rRNA sequencing and gene-based phylogenetic analysis suggested that NKSP-7 and NKSP-9 isolates showed high sequence homology to other species of Bacillus, which confirmed that both strains belong to genus Bacillus. The sequence of NKSP-7 exhibited 95% similarity to Bacillusthuringiensis (GenBank Ac. No. MK875170.1), whereas NKSP-9 sequence showed 96% homology to Bacillus cereus (GenBank Ac. No. MK641669.1). On the basis of sequence analysis, NKSP-7 and NKSP-9 keratinolytic bacteria were identified as Bacillus sp. NKSP-7 and Bacillus sp. NKSP-9, respectively.
Preliminary characterization of crude keratinase
The selected potent keratinolytic isolate Bacillus sp. NKSP-7 was grown in nutrient medium containing chicken feathers (1% w/v). The intense poultry feather degradation was attained when cultivated at 37 °C for 24 h with initial pH of medium adjusted to 7.0, under agitation (150 rev/min). After incubation, the crude supernatant was used for the preliminary characterization of keratinase using keratin azure as substrate at described assay conditions.
Determination of molecular mass
The molecular mass of crude extracellular fraction of keratinase enzyme from Bacillus sp. NKSP-7 was determined using SDS-PAGE analysis. The prominent band of protein at position of 25 kDa was observed (Fig. 1).
Effect of pH and various buffer system
Six different buffer systems were used to evaluate the optimal buffer and pH for extracellular keratinase from Bacillus sp. NKSP-7, and it displayed optimal activity with phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). Enzyme revealed more than 75% of peak activity at pH 5.5–7.5 and 60% activity at pH 9.0 (Fig. 2a). The crude keratinase was quite stable over a wide range of pH from 5.5–8.0 and retained more than 85% of initial activity at pH 5.0 and 8.5 (Fig. 2b), when tested in respective buffers at 40 °C for 4 h in the absence of substrate.
Effect of temperature
Keratinase from Bacillus sp. NKSP-7 showed optimal activity at 60 °C and maintained above 70% of optimal activity over a range of temperature at 45–75 °C, whereas was rapidly inactivated at higher temperatures (Fig. 3). Keratinolytic enzyme exhibited worthy thermostability at 20–65 °C temperature in pH 7.0 buffer for 4 h, whereas above 75 °C enzyme was less stable (Fig. 3).
The storage stability of crude keratinase was scrutinized occasionally, and it was observed that enzyme has 100% stability at 4 °C (cool lab) and at room temperature for 20 days and 120 days, respectively without any significant decline in activity.
Effect of various chemicals on crude keratinase
Enzyme did not show any obvious constrain in the presence of Ba2+, Ca2+, K+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, Cu2+, Fe2+, Mg2+, Co2+, Tween-80, EDTA, Tris, SDS, Urea, and Triton X-100. Only in the presence of Hg2+ enzyme activity was repressed up to certain limit. Whereas activity was enhanced by adding β-mercaptoethanol, Na+, Cd2+ and Mn2+ up to 132.8%, 112.5%, 115.8%, and 110.5%, respectively. Similarly, no inhibitory effect was observed with the addition of 50% (v/v) organic solvents (Table 3).
Discussion
Globally, poultry farms and poultry-processing industries produce an immense amount of keratin-feather waste that create a serious problem of solid waste. Chicken feathers contain about 90% keratin protein that cannot be degraded easily in natural environmental conditions. Their appropriate and sustainable disposal method is a foremost constraint for waste management processing plants. However, keratinolytic microorganisms and enzymes might be used to degrade this abundant insoluble keratin waste into nutritionally rich meal (peptides and amino acids), with prospective applications as organic fertilizer, in foodstuff and animal feed as a supplement (Bhari et al. 2018). Microbial conversion of keratinolytic wastes into valuable byproducts is an impending eco-friendly and alternative approach for the removal of poultry feathers (Abdel-Fattah et al. 2018). Therefore, the present study was focused to isolate bacterial strains from poultry dumping site that possess the ability to hydrolyze feather. The newly isolate Bacillus sp. NKSP-7 was easily cultivated in simple medium with chicken feathers as carbon and nitrogen sources, and recycled recalcitrant keratin-rich feather waste using extracellular keratinase enzyme. Bacillus sp. NKSP-7 has promising potential of bioconversion of poultry-feather into protein-rich feedstuff.
Considering the incessant voluminous keratin wastes in the environment, 45 soil samples from 9 different poultry waste and feather dumping sites of Lahore and its surrounding cities were selected to isolate potential keratinolytic bacterial strains. Among 60 isolates, only 5 isolates SPF-9, NKSP-7, NKSP-9, JPS-9, and SHP-5 showed prominent feather degradation ability and keratinolytic activity as compared to others (Table 1). The dumping sites contain large amount of feathers and native microbes may have adapted to utilize feather-keratin as substrate. Various previous studies have reported the isolation of keratinolytic bacteria from dumping sites of feathers that exhibited the ability to degrade keratin (Sekar et al. 2016; Kurane and Attar 2017; Bhari et al. 2018).
In this study, the result revealed that all isolates produced keratinase enzyme in all cell fractions but maximum activity was found in extracellular fraction than others. Some earlier studies have also been reported that Bacillus spp. predominantly produce extracellular keratinases (Abdel-Fattah et al. 2018; Bhari et al. 2018). Optimal enzyme activity from all experimental isolates weas perceived during the exponential phase of growth (after 24–48 h of fermentation) and reduced gradually with the longer time of incubation, suggesting that strains produced keratinase as primary metabolite. SPF-9, NKSP-7, NKSP-9, JPS-9, and SHP-5 isolates showed peak extracellular activity after 24 h (at 37 °C) (Table 1). Similarly, Kazi et al. (2015) demonstrated an extracellular keratinase from Bacillus subtilis showed optimal activity at the exponential phase with 32.5 U/mL at 37 °C after 72 h. While, Bacillus subtilis FDS15 showed high keratinolytic enzyme activity in supernatant with 16.5 U/mL (Sekar et al. 2016).
Initial morphological study of these 5 isolates revealed that they were gram-positive, aerobic, spore-forming bacilli, and adroit to degrade feather’s keratin (Table 2). These strains were isolated from anaerobic habitat but optimally grew under aerobic conditions, as would be expected from the members of bacillaceae family (Vigneshwaran et al. 2010). Biochemical tests and characteristics revealed that SPF-9, NKSP-7, NKSP-9, JPS-9, and SHP-5 isolates may belong to genus Bacillus (Table 2.). Similar strategy of identification was adopted by various studies (Raju and Divakar 2013; Agrawal and Dalal 2015; Sekar et al. 2016). However, 16S rDNA sequencing confirmed that two most prominent keratinolytic strains, NKSP-7 and NKSP-9, are the member of Bacillus genus. On the basis of sequence analysis, these isolates were identified as new strains, Bacillus sp. NKSP-7 and Bacillus sp. NKSP-9.
Bacillus sp. NKSP-7 and NKSP-9 displayed significant bioconversion of feathers at 37 °C after 24 h. Extracellular keratinase was produced using feather (cheap substrate), by which cost of enzyme production can be reduced. Bhari et al. (2018) reported that Pseudomonas aeruginosa BSP10, Bacillus licheniformis LRP1, and Bacillus aerius NSMk2 degraded the chicken feathers in 120 h at 37 °C. Whereas Bacillus thuringenesis, B. megaterium, and B. pumilus (Agrahari and Wadhwa, 2010) showed degradation in 120 h at 30 °C, Bacillus weihenstephanensis PKD 5 (Sahoo et al. 2012) and another strain of Bacillus licheniformis (Vigneshwaran et al. 2010) displayed maximum degradation after 168 h of incubation at 37 °C and 40 °C, respectively. On the contrary, Bacillus spp. (Agrawal and Dalal 2015) and Bacillus subtilis FDS15 (Sekar et al. 2016) decomposed feathers within 30 days and 21 days, respectively at 37 °C.
Preliminary characterization of crude keratinase from Bacillus sp. NKSP-7 was performed. Enzyme showed best activity at pH 7.0 (Fig. 2a), and was stable over the pH range of 5.5–8.0 (Fig. 2b). Optimal pH of enzyme from NKSP-7 is quite similar to other Bacillus keratinases (Prasad et al. 2010; Vigneshwaran et al. 2010); whereas some displayed optimally activity at pH 8.0–9.0 (Ghasemi et al. 2012; Sahoo et al. 2012; Saibabu et al. 2013). Keratinase from NKSP-7 showed great pH stability (5.5–8.0) in comparison with others keratinases (Vigneshwaran et al. 2010; Ghasemi et al. 2012; Abdel-Fattah et al. 2018). However, the result revealed that the structure of enzyme will be destabilized and altered at variant pH because the net charge can affect protein’s free energy and hence deactivate it (Akram et al. 2018). Keratinase from NKSP-7 displayed peak activity at 60 °C (Fig. 3), which is analogous to other keratinolytic enzymes from Bacillus (Xu et al. 2009; Vigneshwaran et al. 2010); and higher than that of other (35–50 °C) (Prasad et al. 2010; Sahoo et al. 2012; Saibabu et al. 2013). Crude keratinase exhibited high thermal stability at 20–65 °C for 4 h as compared to other keratinases (Abdel-Fattah et al. 2018; Saibabu et al. 2013; Ghasemi et al. 2012; Sahoo et al. 2012). Keratinase from NKSP-7 showed a notable storage stability at 4 °C and room temperature (Ghasemi et al. 2012).
The metallic cations, surfactants, and organic solvents cause a conspicuous inhibitory influence on the activity of microbial enzymes. But keratinase from NKSP-7 did not show any obvious constrain with these additives (Table 3). However, the activity was slightly enhanced by adding β-mercaptoethanol, Na+, Cd2+, and Mn2+; the similar behavior has been reported from Bacillus sp. MKR5 (Ghasemi et al. 2012). However, keratinase from NKSP-7 was strongly inhibited by Hg2+, signifying that Hg2+ might affect catalysis by binding to –SH groups in the active site or/and Hg2+ bind to tryptophan residues and carboxyl groups of amino acids and decrease the enzyme activity due to denaturation. This observation is in line with some prior studies (Xu et al. 2009; Vigneshwaran et al. 2010; Saibabu et al. 2013). However, some cations stimulated the keratinase activity of NKSP-7, which might perform an essential function in the stability of enzyme’s catalytic site and increase the affinity by stabilizing protein’s structural conformation.
Generally, the activity of keratinases was inhibited with the addition of EDTA (Xu et al. 2009; Vigneshwaran et al. 2010). But keratinase from NKSP-7 did not show any inhibitory influence with EDTA, this behavior is in accord with keratinases from Bacillus sp. MKR5 (Ghasemi et al. 2012) and Bacillus megaterium (Saibabu et al. 2013). Hence, keratinase from NKSP-7 cannot be considered as metalloprotease and should possibly categorized as a serine keratinolytic protease. In the presence of β-mercaptoethanol (reducing agent), the activity of keratinase from NKSP-7 was enhanced, possibly through the reduction of disulfide bonds in the enzyme substrate. No noticeable effect was detected by adding isopropanol, methanol, n-butanol, ethanol, DMF, acetonitrile, acetone, and DMSO (Table 3); the comparable results has been reported by Xu et al. (2009) and Cai et al. (2008).
Conclusion
An efficient keratinolytic bacterial strain NKSP-7 was isolated from poultry dumping site, and molecular identification confirmed that it belongs to genus Bacillus (Bacillus sp. NKSP-7). The newly isolated strain Bacillus sp. NKSP-7 efficiently produced extracellular keratinase using recalcitrant keratin-rich feathers as substrate under submerged fermentation. Keratinase from NKSP-7 has promising potential of bioconversion (bioremediation) of feather waste into protein-rich feedstuff and also has impending applications for bio-waste management. The stability of keratinase at elevated temperature and variant pH, independency toward cations, detergents, and organic solvents make this biocatalyst a perceptible candidate for various industries such as agroindustry, cosmetic, animal feed, detergent, textile, pharmacy, waste water treatment, biofuels, and especially in leather industry for dehairing process.
References
Abdel-Fattah AM, El-Gamal MS, Ismail SA, Emran MA, Hashem AM (2018) Biodegradation of feather waste by keratinase produced from newly isolated Bacillus licheniformis ALW1. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 16:311–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.05.005
Agrahari S, Wadhwa N (2010) Degradation of chicken feather a poultry waste product by keratinolytic bacteria isolated from dumping site at Ghazipur poultry processing plant. Int J Poult Sci 9:482–489. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.482.489
Agrawal B, Dalal M (2015) Screening and characterization of keratinase enzyme obtained from keratin degrading microorganism isolated from Sanjan poultry waste dumping soil. Eur Acad Res 2:13986–13994
Akram F, Haq IU, Mukhtar H (2018) Gene cloning, characterization and thermodynamic analysis of a novel multidomain hyperthermophilic GH family 3 β-glucosidase (TnBglB) from Thermotoga naphthophila RKU-10T. Process Biochem 66:70–81
Basar B, Shamzi MM, Rosfarizan M, Puspaningsih NNT, Ariff AB (2010) Enhanced production of thermophilic xylanase by recombinant Escherichia coli DH5α through optimization of medium and dissolved oxygen level. Int J Agric Biol 12:321–328
Bhari R, Manpreet K, Sarup SR, Ashok P, Christian L (2018) Bioconversion of chicken feathers by Bacillus aerius NSMk2: a potential approach in poultry waste management. Bioresour Technol Rep 3:224–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2018.07.015
Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1976.9999
Brandelli A (2005) Production of an extracellular keratinase from Chryseobacterium sp. growing on raw feathers. Electron. J Biotechnol 8:0717–3458. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-34582005000100007
Cai CG, Chen JS, Qi JJ, Yin Y, Zheng XD (2008) Purification and characterization of keratinase from a new Bacillus subtilis strain. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 9:713–720. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B0820128
Cascarosa E, Gea G, Arauzo J (2012) Thermochemical processing of meat and bone meal: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:942–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.015
Ghasemi Y, Shahbazi M, Rasoul-Amini S, Kargar M, Azam S, Kazemi A, Montazeri-Najafabady N (2012) Identification and characterization of feather-degrading bacteria from keratin-rich wastes. Ann Microbiol 62:737–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-011-0313-7
Gopinath SCB, Anbu P, Lakshmipriya T, Tang TH, Chen Y, Hashim U, Ruslinda AR, Arshad MKMD (2015) Biotechnological aspects and perspective of microbial keratinase production. Biomed Res Int 140726:10–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/140726
Holt J G, Krieg NR, Sneath PHA, Staley JT, Willaims ST (1994) Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology: Ninth Edition, Baltimore
Kazi YF, Kumar P, Soomro IH (2015) Characterization of the keratinolytic activity of indigenous Bacillus subtilis keratinase. J Chem Pharm Res 7:800–809
Kshetri P, Ningthoujam DS (2016) Keratinolytic activities of alkaliphilic Bacillus sp. MBRL 575 from a novel habitat, limestone deposit site in Manipur, India. Springer plus 5:595. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2239-9
Kurane AB, Attar YC (2017) Screening and isolation of keratinase producing microorganisms. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol 5:489–495
Ningthoujam DS, Devi LJ, Devi PJ, Kshetri P, Tamreihao K, Mukherjee S, Devi SS, Betterson N (2016) Optimization of keratinase production by Amycolatopsis sp. strain MBRL 40 from a limestone habitat. J Bioprocess Biotechnol 6:282. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9821.1000282
Peng Z, Zhang J, Du G, Chen J (2019) Keratin waste recycling based on microbial degradation: mechanisms and prospects. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:9727–9736
Prasad HV, Kumar G, Karthik L, Rao BKV (2010) Screening of extracellular keratinase producing bacteria from feather processing areas in Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. J Sci Res 2(3):559–565. https://doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v2i3.4567
Raju EVN, Divakar DG (2013) Screening and isolation of keratinase producing bacteria from poultry waste. Int J Pharm Res Allied Sci 2:70–74
Sahoo DK, Das A, Thatoi H, Mondal KC, Pradeep K, Mohapatra D (2012) Keratinase production and biodegradation of whole chicken feather keratin by a newly isolated bacterium under submerged fermentation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 167:1040–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-011-9527-1
Saibabu V, Niyonzima FN, More SS (2013) Isolation, partial purification and characterization of keratinase from Bacillus megaterium. Int Res J Biol Sci 2:13–20
Sekar V, Kannan M, Ganesan R, Dheeba B, Sivakumar N, Kannan K (2016) Isolation and screening of keratinolytic bacteria from feather dumping soil in and around Cuddalore and Villupuram, Tamil Nadu. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci 86:567–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-014-0483-8
Sharma R, Devi S (2018) Versatility and commercial status of microbial keratinases: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 17:19–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-017-9454-x
Tamreihao K, Mukherjee S, Khunjamayum R, Devi LJ, Asem RS, Ningthoujam DS (2019) Feather degradation by keratinolytic bacteria and biofertilizing potential for sustainable agricultural production. J Basic Microbiol 59:4–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201800434
Tork S, Aly MM, Nawar L (2010) Biochemical and molecular characterization of a new local keratinase producing Pseudomomanas sp., MS21. Asian J Biotechnol 2:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajbkr.2010.1.13
Vigneshwaran C, Shanmugam S, Kumar TS (2010) Screening and characterization of keratinase from Bacillus licheniformis isolated from Namakkal poultry farm. Researcher 2:89–96
Xu B, Zhong Q, Tang X, Yang Y, Huang Z (2009) Isolation and characterization of a new keratinolytic bacterium that exhibits significant feather-degrading capability. Afr J Biotechnol 8:4590–4595
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant No. 5-9/PAS/727 from Pakistan Academy of Science, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
IU Haq: designed the study and supervised all work.
F Akram wrote the manuscript, carried out experiments, analyzed the data and performed statistical analysis.
Z Jabbar: also carried out experiments work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no competing interests. We assure the integrity and quality of our research work. It is also stated that there is no plagiarism in this work and all points taken from other authors are well cited in the text. This study is completely independent and impartial.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
N/A. This research did not involve human participants and/or animals.
Informed consent
N/A. This research did not involve human participants.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 7091 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haq, I.u., Akram, F. & Jabbar, Z. Keratinolytic enzyme-mediated biodegradation of recalcitrant poultry feathers waste by newly isolated Bacillus sp. NKSP-7 under submerged fermentation. Folia Microbiol 65, 823–834 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-020-00793-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-020-00793-6