Abstract
Let \(f = P[F]\) denote the Poisson integral of F in the unit disk \({\mathbb {D}}\) with F being absolutely continuous in the unit circle \({\mathbb {T}}\) and \({\dot{F}}\in L^{p}({\mathbb {T}})\), where \({\dot{F}}(e^{it})=\frac{d}{dt} F(e^{it})\) and \(p\ge 1\). Recently, the author in Zhu (J Geom Anal, 2020) proved that (1) if f is a harmonic mapping and \(1\le p< 2\), then \(f_{z}\) and \(\overline{f_{{\overline{z}}}}\in \mathcal {B}^{p}({\mathbb {D}}),\) the classical Bergman spaces of \({\mathbb {D}}\) [12, Theorem 1.2]; (2) if f is a harmonic quasiregular mapping and \(1\le p\le \infty \), then \(f_{z},\) \(\overline{f_{{\overline{z}}}}\in \mathcal {H}^{p}({\mathbb {D}}),\) the classical Hardy spaces of \({\mathbb {D}}\) [12, Theorem 1.3]. These are the main results in Zhu (J Geom Anal, 2020). The purpose of this paper is to generalize these two results. First, we prove that, under the same assumptions, [12, Theorem 1.2] is true when \(1\le p< \infty \). Also, we show that [12, Theorem 1.2] is not true when \(p=\infty \). Second, we demonstrate that [12, Theorem 1.3] still holds true when the assumption f being a harmonic quasiregular mapping is replaced by the weaker one f being a harmonic elliptic mapping.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Preliminaries and the Statement of Main Results
For \(a\in {\mathbb {C}}\) and \(r>0\), let \({\mathbb {D}}(a,r)=\{z:~|z-a|<r\}\). In particular, we use \({\mathbb {D}}_{r}\) to denote the disk \({\mathbb {D}}(0,r)\) and \({\mathbb {D}}\) to denote the unit disk \({\mathbb {D}}_{1}\). Moreover, let \({\mathbb {T}}:=\partial {\mathbb {D}}\) be the unit circle. For \(z=x+iy\in {\mathbb {C}}\), the two complex differential operators are defined by
For \(\alpha \in [0,2\pi ]\), the directional derivative of a harmonic mapping (i.e., a complex-valued harmonic function) f at \(z\in {\mathbb {D}}\) is defined by
where \(z+\rho e^{i\alpha }\in {\mathbb {D}}\), \(f_{z}:=\partial f/\partial z\) and \(f_{{\overline{z}}}:=\partial f/\partial {\overline{z}}\). Then
and
For a sense-preserving harmonic mapping f defined in \({\mathbb {D}}\), the Jacobian of f is given by
and the second complex dilatation of f is given by \(\omega =\overline{f_{{\overline{z}}}}/f_{z}\). It is well known that every harmonic mapping f defined in a simply connected domain \(\Omega \) admits a decomposition \(f = h + {\overline{g}}\), where h and g are analytic. Recall that f is sense-preserving in \(\Omega \) if \(J_{f}>0 \) in \(\Omega \). Thus f is locally univalent and sense-preserving in \(\Omega \) if and only if \(J_{f}>0\) in \(\Omega \), which means that \(h'\ne 0\) in \(\Omega \) and the analytic function \(\omega =g'/h'\) has the property that \(|\omega (z)|<1\) on \(\Omega \) (cf. [4, 10]).
1.1 Hardy-Type Spaces
For \(p\in (0,\infty ]\), the generalized Hardy space \(\mathcal {H}^{p}_{\mathcal {G}}({\mathbb {D}})\) consists of all measurable functions from \({\mathbb {D}}\) to \({\mathbb {C}}\) such that \(M_{p}(r,f)\) exists for all \(r\in (0,1)\), and \( \Vert f\Vert _{p}<\infty \), where
and
The classical Hardy space \(\mathcal {H}^{p}({\mathbb {D}})\), that is, all the elements are analytic, is a subspace of \(\mathcal {H}^{p}_{\mathcal {G}}({\mathbb {D}})\) (cf. [3, 5]).
1.2 Bergman-Type Spaces
For \(p\in (0,\infty ]\), the generalized Bergman space \(\mathcal {B}^{p}_{\mathcal {G}}({\mathbb {D}})\) consists of all measurable functions \(f:\;{\mathbb {D}}\rightarrow {\mathbb {C}}\) such that
where \(d\sigma (z)=\frac{1}{\pi }dxdy\) denotes the normalized Lebesgue area measure on \({\mathbb {D}}\). The classical Bergman space \(\mathcal {B}^{p}({\mathbb {D}})\), that is, all the elements are analytic, is a subspace of \(\mathcal {B}^{p}_{\mathcal {G}}({\mathbb {D}})\) (cf. [7]). Obviously, \(\mathcal {H}^{p}({\mathbb {D}})\subset \mathcal {B}^{p}({\mathbb {D}})\) for each \(p\in (0,\infty ]\).
1.3 Poisson Integrals
Denote by \(L^{p}({\mathbb {T}})~(p\in [1,\infty ])\) the space of all measurable functions F of \({\mathbb {T}}\) into \({\mathbb {C}}\) with
For \(\theta \in [0,2\pi ]\) and \(z\in {\mathbb {D}}\), let
be the Poisson kernel. For a mapping \(F\in L^{1}({\mathbb {T}})\), the Poisson integral of F is defined by
It is well known that if F is absolutely continuous, then it is of bounded variation. This implies that for almost all \(e^{i\theta }\in {\mathbb {T}}\), the derivative \({\dot{F}}(e^{i\theta })\) exists, where
In [12], the author posed the following problem.
Problem 1.1
What conditions on the boundary function F ensure that the partial derivatives of its harmonic extension \(f=P[F]\), i.e., \(f_{z}\) and \(\overline{f_{{\overline{z}}}}\), are in the space \(\mathcal {B}^{p}({\mathbb {D}})\) (or \(\mathcal {H}^{p}({\mathbb {D}})\)), where \(p\ge 1\)?
In [12], the author discussed Problem 1.1 under the condition that F is absolutely continuous. First, he proved the following, which is one of the two main results in [12]. On the related discussion, we refer to the recent paper [9].
Theorem A
( [12, Theorem 1.2]) Suppose that \(p\in [1,2)\) and \(f=P[F]\) is a harmonic mapping in \({\mathbb {D}}\) with \({\dot{F}}\in L^{p}({\mathbb {T}})\), where F is an absolutely continuous function. Then both \(f_{z}\) and \(\overline{f_{{\overline{z}}}}\) are in \(\mathcal {B}^{p}({\mathbb {D}}).\)
Furthermore, by requiring the mappings P[F] to be harmonic quasiregular, the interval of p is widened from [1, 2) into \([1,\infty )\), as shown in the following result, which is the other main result in [12].
Theorem B
( [12, Theorem 1.3]) Suppose that \(p\in [1,\infty ]\) and \(f=P[F]\) is a harmonic K-quasiregular mapping in \({\mathbb {D}}\) with \({\dot{F}}\in L^{p}({\mathbb {T}})\), where F is an absolutely continuous function and \(K\ge 1\). Then both \(f_{z}\) and \(\overline{f_{{\overline{z}}}}\) are in \(\mathcal {H}^{p}({\mathbb {D}})\).
The purpose of this paper is to discuss these two results further. Regarding Theorem A, our result is as follows, which shows that Theorem A is true for \(p\in [1,\infty )\), and also indicates that Theorem A is not true when \(p=\infty \).
Theorem 1.1
Suppose that \(f=P[F]\) is a harmonic mapping in \({\mathbb {D}}\) and \({\dot{F}}\in L^{p}({\mathbb {T}})\), where F is an absolutely continuous function.
-
(1)
If \(p\in [1,\infty )\), then both \(f_{z}\) and \(\overline{f_{{\overline{z}}}}\) are in \(\mathcal {B}^{p}({\mathbb {D}}).\)
-
(2)
If \(p=\infty \), then there exists a harmonic mapping \(f=P[F]\), where F is an absolutely continuous function with \({\dot{F}}\in L^{\infty }({\mathbb {T}})\), such that neither \(f_{z}\) nor \(\overline{f_{{\overline{z}}}}\) is in \(\mathcal {B}^{\infty }({\mathbb {D}}).\)
About Theorem B, we show that this result also holds true for harmonic elliptic mappings, which are more general than harmonic quasiregular mappings. In order to state our result, we need to introduce the definition of elliptic mappings.
A mapping \(f:~\Omega \rightarrow {\mathbb {C}}\) is said to be absolutely continuous on lines, ACL in brief, in the domain \(\Omega \) if for every closed rectangle \(R\subset \Omega \) with sides parallel to the axes x and y, f is absolutely continuous on almost every horizontal line and almost every vertical line in R. Such a mapping has, of course, partial derivatives \(f_{x}\) and \(f_{y}\) a.e. in \(\Omega \). Moreover, we say \(f\in ACL^{2}\) if \(f\in ACL\) and its partial derivatives are locally \(L^{2}\) integrable in \(\Omega \).
A sense-preserving and continuous mapping f of \({\mathbb {D}}\) into \({\mathbb {C}}\) is said to be a \((K,K')\)-elliptic mapping if
-
(1)
f is \(ACL^{2}\) in \({\mathbb {D}}\) and \(J_{f}\ne 0\) a.e. in \({\mathbb {D}}\);
-
(2)
there are constants \(K\ge 1\) and \(K'\ge 0\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert D_{f}\Vert ^{2}\le KJ_{f}+K'~\hbox { a.e. in}\ {\mathbb {D}}. \end{aligned}$$
We remark that the unit disk \({\mathbb {D}}\) in the definition of \((K,K')\)-elliptic mapping can be replaced by a general domain in \({\mathbb {C}}\). In particular, if \(K'\equiv 0\), then a \((K,K')\)-elliptic mapping is said to be K-quasiregular. It is well known that every quasiregular mapping is an elliptic mapping. But the inverse of this statement is not true. This can be seen from the example: Let \(f(z)=z+{\overline{z}}^{2}/2\) in \({\mathbb {D}}\) which is indeed a univalent harmonic mapping of \({\mathbb {D}}\). Then elementary computations show that (a) \(\displaystyle \sup _{z\in {\mathbb {D}}}\{|\omega (z)|\}=1\), which implies that f is not K-quasiregular for any \(K\ge 1\), and (b) f is a (1, 4)-elliptic mapping. We refer to [1, 2, 6, 8, 11] for more details of elliptic mappings.
Now, we are ready to state our next result.
Theorem 1.2
Suppose that \(p\in [1,\infty ]\) and \(f=P[F]\) is a \((K,K')\)-elliptic mapping in \({\mathbb {D}}\) with \({\dot{F}}\in L^{p}({\mathbb {T}})\), where F is an absolutely continuous function, \(K\ge 1\) and \(K'\ge 0\). Then both \(f_{z}\) and \(\overline{f_{{\overline{z}}}}\) are in \(\mathcal {H}^{p}({\mathbb {D}}).\)
The proofs of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 will be presented in Sect. 2.
2 Proofs of the Main Results
We start this section by recalling the following two lemmas from [12].
Lemma C
( [12, Theorem 1.1]) Suppose \(p\in [1,\infty )\) and \(f=P[F]\) is a harmonic mapping in \({\mathbb {D}}\) with \({\dot{F}}\in L^{p}({\mathbb {T}})\), where F is an absolutely continuous function. Then for \(z=re^{it}\in {\mathbb {D}}\),
and thus, \(f_{r}\in \mathcal {B}^{p}_{\mathcal {G}}({\mathbb {D}}),\) where
and \(\Gamma \) denotes the usual Gamma function.
Lemma D
( [12, Lemma 2.3]) Assume the hypotheses of Lemma C. Then for \(z=re^{it}\in {\mathbb {D}}\),
and thus, \(f_{t}\in \mathcal {H}^{p}_{\mathcal {G}}({\mathbb {D}})\).
2.1 Proof of Theorem 1.1
For the proof of the first statement of the theorem, let \(z=re^{it}\in {\mathbb {D}}\). Then we have
which implies that
It follows that for \(p\in [1,\infty )\),
and similarly,
Obviously, to prove that \(f_{z}\) and \(\overline{f_{{\overline{z}}}}\) are in \(\mathcal {B}^{p}({\mathbb {D}})\), it suffices to show the following:
We only need to check the boundedness of the integral
because the boundedness of the integral \(\int _{{\mathbb {D}}}|f_{r}(z)|^{p}d\sigma (z)\) easily follows from Lemma C.
By Lemma D, we have
which yields that
To demonstrate the boundedness of the integral
assume that \(f=h+{\overline{g}}\) where both h and g are analytic in \({\mathbb {D}}\). Then \(\Vert D_{f}\Vert =|h'|+|g'|\). This implies that \(\Vert D_{f}\Vert \) is continuous in \(\overline{{\mathbb {D}}}_{\frac{1}{2}}\), and thus, \(\Vert D_{f}\Vert \) is bounded in \(\overline{{\mathbb {D}}}_{\frac{1}{2}}\). Hence, by (2.1), we have
Combining (2.2) and (2.3) gives the final estimate
which is what we need, and so, the statement (1) of the theorem is true.
To prove the second statement of the theorem, let \(F(e^{i\theta })=|\sin \theta |\), where \(\theta \in [0,2\pi ]\). Then F is absolutely continuous and \({\dot{F}}\in L^{\infty }({\mathbb {T}})\). Also, elementary computations guarantee that for \(z=re^{it}\in {\mathbb {D}}\),
Then
which implies that
Since
we see that
Combining (2.4) and (2.5) gives
which implies that \(f_{z}\) is not in \(\mathcal {B}^{\infty }({\mathbb {D}}).\)
By the similar reasoning, we know that \(\overline{f_{{\overline{z}}}}\) is not in \(\mathcal {B}^{\infty }({\mathbb {D}})\) either, and hence, the theorem is proved. \(\square \)
2.2 Proof of Theorem 1.2
Assume that \(f=P[F]\) is a \((K,K')\)-elliptic mapping in \({\mathbb {D}}\), which means that for \(z\in {\mathbb {D}},\)
We divide the proof of this theorem into two cases.
Case 2.1 Suppose that \(p\in [1,\infty ).\)
It follows from (2.6) that
and thus, we have
By (2.1), (2.7) and Lemma D, we know that for \(z=re^{it}\in {\mathbb {D}},\)
which implies that
Hence \(f_{z},~\overline{f_{{\overline{z}}}}\in \mathcal {H}^{p}({\mathbb {D}}).\)
Case 2.2 Suppose that \(p=\infty .\)
By (2.6), we have
which, together with (2.1) and Lemma D, gives
Consequently,
from which we conclude that \(f_{z},~\overline{f_{{\overline{z}}}}\in \mathcal {H}^{\infty }({\mathbb {D}}),\) and hence the theorem is proved. \(\square \)
References
Chen, Sh., Kalaj, D.: On asymptotically sharp bi-Lipschitz inequalities of quasiconformal mappings satisfying inhomogeneous polyharmonic equations. J. Geom. Anal. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-020-00460-9
Chen, Sh, Ponnusamy, S.: On certain quasiconformal and elliptic mappings. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 486, 1–16 (2020)
Chen, Sh, Ponnusamy, S., Rasila, A.: On characterizations of Bloch-type, Hardy-type, and Lipschitz-type spaces. Math. Z. 279, 163–183 (2015)
Clunie, J.G., Sheil-Small, T.: Harmonic univalent functions. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A 9, 3–25 (1984)
Duren, P.: Theory of \(H^{p}\) Spaces, 2nd edn. Dover, Mineola (2000)
Finn, R., Serrin, J.: On the Hölder continuity of quasiconformal and elliptic mappings. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 89, 1–15 (1958)
Hedenmalm, H., Korenblum, B., Zhu, K.: Theory of Bergman Spaces. Springer, New York (2000)
Kalaj, D., Mateljević, M.: \((K, K^{\prime })\)-quasiconformal harmonic mappings. Potential Anal. 36, 117–135 (2012)
Kalaj, D.: On Riesz type inequalities for harmonic mappings on the unit disk. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 372, 4031–4051 (2019)
Lewy, H.: On the non-vanishing of the Jacobian in certain one-to-one mappings. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 42, 689–692 (1936)
Nirenberg, L.: On nonlinear elliptic partial differential equations and Hölder continuity. Commun. Pure. Appl. Math. 6, 103–156 (1953)
Zhu, J.-F.: Norm estimates of the partial derivatives for harmonic mappings and harmonic quasiregular mappings. J. Geom. Anal. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-020-00488-x
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the referee for her/his useful comments and suggestions. The first author (Mr. Shaolin Chen) was partly supported by NNSF of China under the number 12071116, the Science and Technology Plan Project of Hunan Province (No. 2016TP1020), and the Application-Oriented Characterized Disciplines, Double First-Class University Project of Hunan Province (Xiangjiaotong [2018]469); the third author (Mr. Xiantao Wang) was partly supported by NNSFs of China under the numbers 12071121 and 11720101003, and the project under the number 2018KZDXM034.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, S., Ponnusamy, S. & Wang, X. Remarks on ‘Norm Estimates of the Partial Derivatives for Harmonic Mappings and Harmonic Quasiregular Mappings’. J Geom Anal 31, 11051–11060 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-021-00672-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-021-00672-7