Abstract
Marine cyanobacteria are attractive organisms as feedstock for bioethanol and biotechnological applications. Previously, a marine cyanobacterial strain Synechococcus elongatus BDU 130192 was identified which can accumulate high polyglucan levels without the need to resort to N-deprivation. In this study, among the three different temperatures (30, 34, and 38 °C) tested, the highest biomass accumulation and total carbohydrate occur at 34 °C. The biomass and total carbohydrate increased with increasing light intensities, while protein, chlorophyll, and carotenoid contents were reduced. The best growth occurred at 1.8% NaCl concentration, even though the strain could grow well until 5.8% NaCl. Among the different concentrations of CO2 tested, the best growth occurred at 5% CO2 in the air. NaNO3 gave the best growth, though the cells were able to grow well on urea and NH4Cl too. Tripling the concentration of either N or P in the medium led to a significant increase in growth rate. The strain does not require the addition of vitamin B12 for growth, and about 90% flocculation could be achieved in an hour with the addition of chitosan. High productivities of 0.5 g/L/day of biomass and 0.23 g/L/day of carbohydrates could be reached in a 3-L photobioreactor (PBR) bubbled with air. This work shows many unique properties of this strain such as high carbohydrate productivity, ability to tolerate high light intensities and high concentrations of salt and CO2, and efficient flocculation. These properties make Synechococcus elongatus BDU 130192 an attractive candidate as a feedstock for bioethanol and biotechnological applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Photosynthetic biomanufacturing is promising for the sustainable and economical production of fuels, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and feedstock [1, 2]. Cyanobacteria are oxygenic photoautotrophs, belonging to a morphologically and geographically diverse group of photosynthetic prokaryotes responsible for the production of one-third to one-half of total global biomass and oxygen in the atmosphere [3, 4]. Cyanobacteria and algae may be better photosynthetic platforms than plants due to their higher biomass production rates, photosynthetic efficiencies (3–9% in cyanobacteria and 1–3% in plants) [5], and ability to grow in fresh, sea, and wastewater which provides additional benefits of whole year cultivation in non-arable land [6]. Marine photosynthetic microorganisms have an additional advantage as they can be cultivated in seawater, which is not used for human consumption and agricultural use [7, 8]. Another quality of marine cyanobacteria is their potential to withstand higher salt concentrations which reduces the possibility of contamination in open ponds [9], though the higher ash content may pose a challenge while converting the biomass into energy in processes such as gasification. In addition to potentially high biomass productivity, cyanobacteria, being photoautotrophic, can help fix atmospheric CO2 and hence may help regulate the levels of the greenhouse gas [10]. Cyanobacteria have highly effective carbon-concentrating mechanisms (CCM), such as active HCO3− and CO2 transporters, to facilitate CO2 fixation [11, 12]. Glycogen is the primary carbon storage polymer in cyanobacteria and the organisms may accumulate more than 50% of their biomass depending on strain and growth conditions [13]. Glycogen is potentially useful as a substrate for bioethanol production [14]. Another advantage is that the biomass hydrolysate will also have peptides and amino acids that will support the growth of the organism and may require little additional nitrogen to be added [15].
The usefulness of the microorganism for industrial purposes strongly depends on their biological characteristics such as their optimal pH, temperature, and light intensity [16]. Other parameters that affect productivity are the choice of nitrogen, phosphorus sources [17], and the concentration of CO2 used. Optimal physical parameters help to improve growth conditions, biomass productivity, and ultimately in the accumulation of useful products. Cyanobacterial biomass grows best under saturating light intensities [18], with 100–800 μmol/m2/s and temperatures of 30–38 °C used in most previous studies with Synechococcus species [19]. An important consideration while developing processes based on unicellular photosynthetic organisms is how to harvest them efficiently as it may contribute to about 20–30% of the total biomass production costs [20]. Thus, cells that grow rapidly, accumulate high amounts of glycogen/carbohydrates, can tolerate a variety of temperature and light intensities, are salt-tolerant, and easy to harvest would be useful for further development as a potential feedstock for fermentation and bioethanol production [21, 22].
A marine cyanobacterial strain isolated from Indian salt pans with good growth and high cellular carbohydrate content was previously reported. Previous works include the publication of its genome sequence [23] and reconstruction of its genome-scale metabolic model as well as some biochemical aspects [24]. These works suggested general robustness of the organism, e.g., the existence of alternate methionine synthesis pathways suggested that this strain should not be auxotrophic to vitamin B12 while the scanning electron microscopic (SEM) analysis indicated many surface polymers suggesting rapid flocculation for harvesting biomass. In this work, experimental validations of some of these predictions and responses to various process parameters are presented. The overall schematic diagram of the experiments done is shown in Fig. 1. The results indicate the suitability of this organism for feedstock application due to its several advantageous characteristics.
Material and Methods
Chemicals and Materials
NaCl and Tris base were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Mumbai, India), KCl was from Amresco (Solon, OH, USA), and MgSO4·7H2O, CuSO4·5H2O, Na2EDTA, H3BO3, CaCl2·2H2O, KH2PO4, NaNO3, vitamin B12, FeCl3·6H2O, MnCl2·4H2O, ZnCl2, and CoCl2·6H2O were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All chemicals were of analytical reagent (AR) grade.
Cyanobacterial Strain and Regular Culture Maintenance
The cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus BDU 130192 was obtained from the National Facility for Marine Cyanobacteria (NFMC), Bharathidasan University (BDU), Thiruchirapalli, India, and grown in A+ medium containing 4 μg/L vitamin B12 [25]. Strain purity was checked by an absence of growth in LB medium when incubated in the dark at 37 °C. For regular culture, the cells were grown in 250-mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100-mL culture in an incubator shaker (Innova 44, New Brunswick) maintained at 30 °C, 150 rpm agitation, and light intensity of 150 μmol/m2/s with 16:8 h light/dark cycle, illuminated by LED lamps (Design Innova, India).
Variation of Medium Components
To evaluate the effect of nitrogen sources, NaNO3 in A+ medium (11.8 mM) was replaced with either 5.9 mM urea or 11.8 mM NH4Cl [26]. To test the effect of different concentrations of NaNO3 (N), KH2PO4 (P), or their combination, their concentrations were kept the same as in A+ medium (1×) [27] or increased to 3 times the concentration in A+ medium (3×). Salt concentration was varied by adding more NaCl to A+ medium as desired. To evaluate the necessity of vitamin B12, vitamin B12 was omitted from the medium.
Experimental Setup and Cultivation Conditions
All the experiments were performed in a Multi-cultivator system (MC 1000-OD, Photo System Instruments, Czech Republic), unless otherwise indicated. The Multi-cultivator system allows culture in 8 tubes at chosen light intensities in parallel at a given temperature [28]. The initial optical density (OD) of inoculum was set to 0.1 with a culture volume of 60 mL and each tube was bubbled with sterile filtered ambient air at an inlet flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. Light intensities were set at 100, 300, 500, and 800 μmol/m2/s in parallel tubes while the temperatures were set sequentially at 30 °C, 34 °C, 38 °C, or 42 °C, thereby covering the full factorial design of light intensity and temperature.
When testing the effect of photoperiod, the cultures were illuminated for only 12 or 16 h with 300 μmol/m2/s light intensity.
For normal cultures, the tubes were bubbled with air. For experiments where the effect of CO2 concentration in the air was tested, CO2 at the desired concentration was bubbled using specially ordered gas cylinders (Laser gases, India).
Analytical Methods
Growth of the cells in MC was monitored by measuring the OD730 (spectrophotometrically, UVmini-1240, Shimadzu Co.) after every 3 h for 2 days while examining the effect of light and temperature. When required, the samples were diluted to obtain the OD within linear range and the obtained value was multiplied by the corresponding dilution factor. Dry cell weight (DCW) was measured as per an earlier published protocol [29]. Thirty milliliters of culture was centrifuged at 5000g for 10 min, the pellet was washed twice with distilled water, and the cells were transferred to a pre-weighed 2-mL microcentrifuge tube, dried in a dry bath at 65 °C for about 24 h until the weight of the tube became constant. The weight of a blank microcentrifuge tube was then subtracted from the filled microcentrifuge tube to obtain the biomass weight in 30-mL culture and then calculated accordingly for weight per liter of culture.
The total carbohydrate (TC) was measured by a concentrated sulfuric acid method [30]. The total protein (TP) was extracted in 1 N NaOH [31] and estimated by the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method [32]. Photosynthetic pigments were extracted in methanol and analyzed as per previously published protocols [24].
For estimating N and P utilization, 1-mL culture was taken every day. The cells were pelleted and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.45-μm syringe filter. Nitrate was estimated in the filtrate by the salicylic acid method [33]. NaNO3 was used as a standard in the concentration range of 0–23.8 mM. The estimation of phosphate was carried out by the ammonium molybdate method [34]. KH2PO4 was used as a standard in the concentration range of 0–0.72 mM.
Flocculation of Cells with Chitosan
The cyanobacterial strains Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 and Synechococcus elongatus BDU 130192 were grown in A+ medium until OD730 reached ~ 6. To test flocculation in the presence of chitosan [20], 16 mg/L chitosan (from shrimp shells, Sisco Research Laboratory Pvt. Ltd., India) was added to the cultures, the contents were mixed, and the tubes were placed at room temperature on a laboratory bench. The cultures were allowed to settle for up to 60 min. A supernatant sample was taken at 0, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, and 60 min using a pipette and its OD730 nm was measured. The flocculation efficiency was calculated as the percentage reduction of the OD730 value in the supernatant after treatment with chitosan in comparison with the initial concentration.
Cell Culture in a Bioreactor
Cells were cultivated in a 3-L automated bioreactor (Applikon Biotechnology, Holland) [35], with a working volume of 1.5 L. The temperature was set at 34 °C and the stirring at 300 rpm. Air was bubbled at 2 mL/min. The bioreactor was continuously illuminated from the outside by LED lights (Design Innova, Delhi, India). The light intensity was kept initially at 100 μmol/m2/s and was increased by 100 μmol/m2/s every 8 h up to 1000 μmol/m2/s. Seeding OD was 0.1 and the subsequent ODs were taken at 730 nm spectrophotometrically after every 12 h for 4 days.
Statistical Analysis
All the experiments were performed in biological triplicates and the data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. All plots were statistically analyzed and plotted in Sigma Plot version 12.5, Systat Software Inc. Statistical significance was calculated using the paired Student’s t test or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s honest significant difference (Tukey’s HSD) post hoc tests. The ANOVA was conducted in R.
Results
Effect of Different Light Intensities, Temperature, and Photoperiod on Growth
The initial experiments had indicated that the cells grow better in A+ as compared to ASN-III medium as shown in Supplementary Fig. S1. So all further experiments were conducted in the A+ medium.
The cells were grown in different combinations of light intensities and temperature. The temperature and light intensity range were chosen based on previous reports on Synechococcus sp. strains [19, 36]. The growth rate of the cells increased with increasing light intensity at all the temperatures tested (Fig. 2a) with a maximum of 0.067 ± 0.001 h−1 at 34 °C and 800 μmol/m2/s. The growth rate was significantly affected by light intensity and temperature as well as their interaction as per two-way ANOVA.
The growth of the strain was abruptly affected upon increasing the temperature to 42 °C and the cells started to die (not shown). In agreement with the growth rate data, light intensity, temperature, and their interaction also affected the biomass concentration after 2 days of growth (Fig. 2b). However, at the extreme light intensities tested (100 and 800 μmol/m2/s), there was no significant effect of temperature on biomass accumulation. The culture achieved a dry cell weight of 586 ± 11 mg/L (n = 3) at the maximum light intensity and at 34 °C (Fig. 2b).
The cells grow best under constant illumination; 8 h of darkness a day reduced the growth by about 40% while 12 h darkness reduced the growth by about 75% (Fig. 2c).
Thus, the results show that among temperature and light intensity, the latter has a greater effect on biomass accumulation of the cells and constant illumination significantly increases biomass accumulation compared to dark: light cycles.
Effect of Light and Temperature on Biochemical Composition
Similar to the effect seen on biomass concentration of light and temperature, light intensity had a significant effect on TC content while temperature had a lesser, but significant, effect in the range tested (Fig. 3a). The TC content increased with light intensity though the increase was significant when the intensity was increased from 100 to 300, but lesser afterward. At all the light intensities tested, the TC content of the cells was highest at 34 °C. It was found that the maximum carbohydrate of approximately 55–60% DCW was accumulated at 34 °C and 800 μmol/m2/s.
In contrast to the trend observed for biomass and TC, the TP content showed a decreasing trend with increasing light intensities (Fig. 3b). Here too, light was a major factor while temperature was a minor factor that affected TP. Interestingly, at all light intensities, the cells grown at 34 °C had a significantly lower protein content.
Similar to the trend observed for TP, the photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a and carotenoid content) showed a decreasing trend with increasing light intensity (Fig. 3c and Fig. 3d). There was no significant difference in pigment content between 30 and 34 °C. However, incubation at 38 °C significantly reduced the pigments at all light intensities tested, in agreement with the paler appearance of the cells at this temperature (not shown).
Therefore, the optimal temperature chosen for this strain is 34 °C (based on the growth rate, DCW, and TC content).
Effect of Different Concentrations of Salt and CO2 on Growth
Synechococcus elongatus BDU 130192 was found to be capable of tolerating high salt (NaCl) concentrations although the growth decreases with increasing salt concentrations (Fig. 4a). There was a drastic reduction in growth when going from salt concentration of 7.8 to 9.8%. Thus, ~ 8% salt concentration seems like an upper limit of tolerance of this strain.
This strain was also grown under varying CO2 concentrations and 5% CO2 in the air gave the highest growth (Fig. 4b). Concentrations higher than 5% CO2 had an inhibitory effect on growth and the growth was even lesser than that on compressed air.
Growth in a Medium Without Vitamin B12, in Presence of Different Nitrogen Sources, Consumption of N and P with the Growth Curve, and the Variation of N and P Levels
In a previous study, this strain was identified as a close homolog of Synechococcus sp. PCC 73109 [24] which can grow well without the addition of vitamin B12. Additionally, the metabolic network of these cells has alternative pathways for the synthesis of methionine [24]. Therefore, the requirement of vitamin B12 addition was tested and the results showed that these cells do not require vitamin B12 addition for growth (Fig. 5a).
Among the different N sources tested, NaNO3 was found to be the best for growth as shown in Fig. 5b. The cells could also grow reasonably well on urea and NH4Cl, though the growth was slightly lower than that with NaNO3.
The utilization profile of the substrates on normal A+ medium showed that 60–70% of nitrate was consumed while 40–50% of phosphate was consumed after 5 days of growth (Fig. 5c).
As nitrogen and phosphorus are the major components of cyanobacterial media, the strain was further studied under different nitrate and phosphate concentrations (modified A+ media). Figure 5 d illustrates that increasing the N or P concentration in the medium increased the growth of the cells. However, increasing both N and P did not increase the growth any more than that observed with a higher level of N or P alone.
Growth in a PBR with Increasing Light Intensity
A significant increase in growth was observed when the cells were grown in a PBR with increasing light intensity and the OD730 reached ~ 7 in 4 days as shown in Supplementary Fig. S2. The TC was in the range of 45–50% DCW and the dry cell weight to OD730 conversion was 291 mg/L/OD730. Thus, biomass productivity of 0.5 g/L/day and carbohydrate productivity of approximately 0.23 g/L/day could be reached in a PBR with air bubbling.
Flocculation of Synechococcus elongatus BDU 130192 and Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002
The preliminary experiments showed that in the range of 0–30 mg/L chitosan, the lowest concentration that provided efficient settling of Synechococcus elongatus BDU 130192 was 16 mg/L. Because Synechococcus elongatus BDU 130192 was previously shown to have more surface polymers than Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 [24], the flocculation of these two strains in presence of 16 mg/L chitosan was compared. Indeed, Synechococcus elongatus BDU 130192 flocculated significantly more (~ 95% flocculation) in an hour as compared to Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 (~ 40% flocculation) at this chitosan concentration (Fig. 6).
Discussion
For feedstock applications for bioethanol production and other biotechnological processes, a strain should be fast-growing, robust, have good carbohydrate productivity, and easy to harvest. Though cyanobacterial biomass itself is not a feedstock for lipid production, the sugar and protein produced could, in principle, be used to cultivate oleogenic yeast strains to produce lipids and biodiesel. Here, the response of Synechococcus elongatus BDU 130192 to various process parameters such as a wide range of light intensity and different photoperiods, temperature, salinity, and flocculation ability is shown. The strain has a high level of tolerance to different environmental stresses (CO2, light, and salts). These results, along with the high biomass and carbohydrate productivities obtained, suggest that the strain may be an encouraging organism for the production of carbohydrates and protein. Good growth on urea makes it possible to use this strain for treating human and animal liquid wastes while producing biomass rich in sugars and protein. No requirement of vitamin B12 would help to make the medium cheaper.
The salinity tolerance of this strain is higher than that reported for Synechococcus PCC 7002, which shows a reduction in growth when cultured in 1 M NaCl [37] and mutated Synechocystis PCC 6803 cells that grow well in 3.5% salt [38]. Cultivation in a high-salt medium could not only protect against contamination but may also increase autofermentation rates and the product yields through increased “sodium stress cycling” [39]. Additionally, given that the cells were originally isolated from salt pans, it is likely that adaptive laboratory evolution could be used to further increase salinity tolerance of the cells.
It has been suggested that light intensity affects cyanobacterial biomass [40]. Indeed, light intensity had a greater effect on cellular responses compared to temperature in the range tested. While biomass and carbohydrate content increased with increasing light intensity, total protein and pigments reduced. This trend of increased biomass and reduced chlorophyll is in agreement with previous studies [41]. Few previous studies have looked into the effect of light intensity on cellular protein content. Interestingly, there was an inverse relation between the biomass and the cellular protein and pigment content. This result is in agreement with the thesis that cyanobacterial growth is affected by resource allocation [42].
An important decision in the culture of photosynthetic organisms is whether to utilize an open-pond or a photobioreactor system. Open-pond systems require significantly reduced CAPEX but have issues of reduced productivity and greater chances of contamination. Additionally, in open-pond systems, the cells are exposed to daylight cycles and poor control of important process variables such as light intensity, pH, and temperature. Here, it is shown that while the strain may be amenable for open-pond cultivation due to tolerance of high light intensities, ability to withstand high salinity, and good growth at different temperatures tested, the growth is significantly improved when the cells are cultivated under constant illumination and under high light intensities. Therefore, it may be worthwhile to consider a “hybrid” open-pond system with continuous illumination to achieve good productivity while keeping the costs low.
The cells grew best when cultured with bubbling of 5% CO2 in the air. There was a significant increase in growth at 5% CO2 compared to 3% CO2 bubbling. The OD with 5% CO2 bubbling was about 1.5-fold than that with 1% air bubbling. Thus, the better growth at 5% compared to 1% CO2 is different from that observed for Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002, which shows only a slight increase in biomass when grown at 2% CO2 compared to 1% CO2 [43]. The ability to grow at higher CO2 concentrations may be beneficial for applications involving the use of exhaust gases to grow cyanobacterial biomass.
The net carbohydrate productivity in the fermenter was approximately 0.23 g/L/day. While this is slightly lesser than the value reported in a previous study [24], this productivity was achieved with air bubbling and at a larger scale (1.5-L culture vs. 60-mL tube cultures in the previous study). It is likely that higher, comparable productivity can be achieved by bubbling in air-CO2 mixtures as in other studies. Additionally, the experiments with higher nitrate or phosphate concentrations show another way of increasing biomass accumulation rates.
Harvesting unicellular cultures contribute significantly to total production costs. The efficient harvesting of Synechococcus elongatus BDU 130192 cells with a low concentration of chitosan could be very beneficial in reducing the harvesting costs as well. The difference in kinetics of settling as compared with another popular marine cyanobacterial strain suggests a difference in membrane structure and composition.
Conclusion
Synechococcus elongatus BDU 130192 exhibits several properties such as very high carbohydrate productivity; ability to tolerate high light intensities, salt, and CO2 concentrations; not needing vitamin B12 for growth; and rapid and efficient flocculation with chitosan. These properties make it an attractive feedstock candidate for bioethanol generation and other biotechnological applications. The results with increased biomass and TC through an increase in light intensity and nitrate or phosphate concentrations in medium provide ways to increase cyanobacterial biomass and carbohydrate productivity.
Data Availability
Data will be made available to all interested researchers upon request.
References
Luan G, Lu X (2018) Tailoring cyanobacterial cell factory for improved industrial properties. Biotechnol Adv 36:430–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.01.005
Kusakabe T, Tatsuke T, Tsuruno K, Hirokawa Y, Atsumi S, Liao JC, Hanai T (2013) Engineering a synthetic pathway in cyanobacteria for isopropanol production directly from carbon dioxide and light. Metab Eng 20:101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2013.09.007
Stanier RY, Deruelles J, Rippka R, Herdman M, Waterbury JB (1979) Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. Microbiol 111:1–61. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-111-1-1
Stanier RY, Bazine GC (1977) Phototrophic prokaryotes: the cyanobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 31:225–274. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.31.100177.001301
Dismukes GC, Carrieri D, Bennette N, Ananyev GM, Posewitz MC (2008) Aquatic phototrophs: efficient alternatives to land-based crops for biofuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19:235–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2008.05.007
Pathak J, Rajneesh MPK et al (2018) Cyanobacterial farming for environment friendly sustainable agriculture practices: innovations and perspectives. Front Environ Sci 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00007
Wang H, Yang Y, Chen W, Ding L, Li P, Zhao X, Wang X, Li A, Bao Q (2013) Identification of differentially expressed proteins of Arthrospira (Spirulina) plantensis-YZ under salt-stress conditions by proteomics and qRT-PCR analysis. Proteome Sci 11:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-5956-11-6
Figler A, B-Beres V, Dobronoki D et al (2019) Salt tolerance and desalination abilities of nine common green microalgae isolates. Water 11:2527. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11122527
Hagemann M (2011) Molecular biology of cyanobacterial salt acclimation. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35:87–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00234.x
Skjanes K, Lindblad P, Muller J (2007) BioCO2 – A multidisciplinary, biological approach using solar energy to capture CO2 while producing H2 and high value products. Biomol Eng 24:405–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioeng.2007.06.002
Fx F, Me W, Y Z et al (2007) Effects of increased temperature and CO2 on photosynthesis, growth, and elemental ratios in marine Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus (Cyanobacteria). J Phycol 43:485–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2007.00355.x
Pessarakli M (2016) Handbook of Photosynthesis. CRC Press
Hasunuma T, Kikuyama F, Matsuda M, Aikawa S, Izumi Y, Kondo A (2013) Dynamic metabolic profiling of cyanobacterial glycogen biosynthesis under conditions of nitrate depletion. J Exp Bot 64:2943–2954. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert134
John RP, Anisha GS, Nampoothiri KM, Pandey A (2011) Micro and macroalgal biomass: a renewable source for bioethanol. Bioresour Technol 102:186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.139
Mollers K, Cannella D, Jorgensen H, Frigaard N-U (2014) Cyanobacterial biomass as carbohydrate and nutrient feedstock for bioethanol production by yeast fermentation. Biotechnol Biofuels 7:64. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-64
Cordara A, Re A, Pagliano C, van Alphen P, Pirone R, Saracco G, Branco dos Santos F, Hellingwerf K, Vasile N (2018) Analysis of the light intensity dependence of the growth of Synechocystis and of the light distribution in a photobioreactor energized by 635 nm light. PeerJ 6:e5256. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5256
Selao TT, Włodarczyk A, Nixon PJ, Norling B (2019) Growth and selection of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 using alternative nitrogen and phosphorus sources. Metab Eng 54:255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2019.04.013
Kumar M, Kulshreshtha J, Singh GP (2011) Growth and biopigment accumulation of cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis at different light intensities and temperature. Braz J Microbiol 42:1128–1135. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822011000300034
Mackey KRM, Paytan A, Caldeira K, Grossman AR, Moran D, McIlvin M, Saito MA (2013) Effect of temperature on photosynthesis and growth in marine Synechococcus spp. Plant Physiol 163:815–829. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.221937
Renault F, Sancey B, Badot PM, Crini G (2009) Chitosan for coagulation/flocculation processes – an eco-friendly approach. Eur Polym J 45:1337–1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.12.027
Ducat DC, Way JC, Silver PA (2011) Engineering cyanobacteria to generate high-value products. Trends Biotechnol 29:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.12.003
Rosenberg JN, Oyler GA, Wilkinson L, Betenbaugh MJ (2008) A green light for engineered algae: redirecting metabolism to fuel a biotechnology revolution. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19:430–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2008.07.008
Pathania R, Ahmad A, Srivastava S (2017) Draft genome sequence of an Indian marine cyanobacterial strain with fast growth and high polyglucan content. Genome Announc 5. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01334-17
Ahmad A, Pathania R, Srivastava S (2020) Biochemical characteristics and a genome-scale metabolic model of an Indian euryhaline cyanobacterium with high polyglucan content. Metabolites 10:177. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo10050177
De Farias Silva CE, Sforza E, Bertucco A (2017) Effects of pH and carbon source on Synechococcus PCC 7002 cultivation: biomass and carbohydrate production with different strategies for pH control. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 181:682–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-016-2241-2
Muthuraj M, Kumar V, Palabhanvi B, Das D (2014) Evaluation of indigenous microalgal isolate Chlorella sp. FC2 IITG as a cell factory for biodiesel production and scale up in outdoor conditions. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 41:499–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-013-1397-9
Kim H, Jo BY, Kim HS et al (2017) Effect of different concentrations and ratios of ammonium, nitrate, and phosphate on growth of the blue-green alga (cyanobacterium) Microcystis aeruginosa isolated from the Nakdong River, Korea. ALGAE 32:275–284. https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2017.32.10.23
Varshney P, Sohoni S, Wangikar PP, Beardall J (2016) Effect of high CO2 concentrations on the growth and macromolecular composition of a heat- and high-light-tolerant microalga. J Appl Phycol 28:2631–2640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-016-0797-4
Dutt V, Srivastava S (2018) Novel quantitative insights into carbon sources for synthesis of poly hydroxybutyrate in Synechocystis PCC 6803. Photosynth Res 136:303–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-017-0464-x
DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:353–356 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ac60111a017
Watson J, Degnan B, Degnan S, Kromer JO (2014) Determining the biomass composition of a sponge holobiont for flux analysis. In: Kromer JO, Nielsen LK, Blank LM (eds) Metabolic Flux Analysis. Springer New York, New York, NY, pp 107–125
Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner FH, Provenzano MD, Fujimoto EK, Goeke NM, Olson BJ, Klenk DC (1985) Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem 150:76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(85)90442-7
Cataldo DA, Maroon M, Schrader LE, Youngs VL (1975) Rapid colorimetric determination of nitrate in plant tissue by nitration of salicylic acid. Commun Soil Sci Plan 6:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627509366547
Taussky HH, Shorr E (1953) A microcolorimetric method for the determination of inorganic phosphorus. J Biol Chem 202:675–685
Johnson TJ, Katuwal S, Anderson GA, Gu L, Zhou R, Gibbons WR (2018) Photobioreactor cultivation strategies for microalgae and cyanobacteria. Biotechnol Prog 34:811–827. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.2628
Jackson SA, Eaton Rye JJ (2017) Modular growth vessels for the cultivation of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002. N Z J Bot 55:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.2016.1231123
Aikawa S, Nishida A, Hasunuma T et al (2019) Short-term temporal metabolic behavior in halophilic Cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7002 after salt shock. Metabolites 9:297. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9120297
Pade N, Hagemann M (2014) Salt acclimation of cyanobacteria and their application in biotechnology. Life 5:25–49. https://doi.org/10.3390/life5010025
Carrieri D, Momot D, Brasg IA, Ananyev G, Lenz O, Bryant DA, Dismukes GC (2010) Boosting autofermentation rates and product yields with sodium stress cycling: application to production of renewable fuels by cyanobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:6455–6462. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00975-10
Singh P, Kumar D (2020) Biomass and lipid productivities of cyanobacteria- Leptolyngbya foveolarum HNBGU001. Bioenerg Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10170-3
Bhandari R, Sharma PK (2006) High-light-induced changes on photosynthesis, pigments, sugars, lipids and antioxidant enzymes in freshwater (Nostoc spongiaeforme) and marine (Phormidium corium) cyanobacteria. Photochem Photobiol 82:702–710. https://doi.org/10.1562/2005-09-20-RA-690
Zavrel T, Faizi M, Loureiro C et al (2019) Quantitative insights into the cyanobacterial cell economy. eLife 8:e42508. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42508
Aikawa S, Nishida A, Ho S-H, Chang JS, Hasunuma T, Kondo A (2014) Glycogen production for biofuels by the euryhaline cyanobacteria Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7002 from an oceanic environment. Biotechnol Biofuels 7:88. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-88
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to DBT for the funding and ICGEB, New Delhi, for the space and facilities. The authors also thank Dr. Kavish Kumar Jain for his help with the fermenter experiment. RP thanks CSIR (Council of Scientific and Industrial Research) for her Ph.D. fellowship.
Funding
The authors thank the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Ministry of Science and Technology, India, for funding the research via the DBT-ICGEB Center for Advanced Bioenergy Research grant (No. BT/PB/Centre/03/2011-Phase 2).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics Approval/Consent to Participate
Not applicable to the article
Consent for Publication
All the authors have read the manuscript and agree to its publication.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pathania, R., Srivastava, S. Synechococcus elongatus BDU 130192, an Attractive Cyanobacterium for Feedstock Applications: Response to Culture Conditions. Bioenerg. Res. 14, 954–963 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10207-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10207-7