Abstract
Molecular chaperones aid proteins to fold and assemble without modifying their final structure, requiring, in several folding processes, the interplay between members of the Hsp70 and Hsp40 families. Here, we report the NMR chemical shift assignments for 1 H, 15 N, and 13 C nuclei of the backbone and side chains of the J-domain of the class B Hsp40 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Sis1, complexed with the C-terminal EEVD motif of Hsp70. The data revealed information on the structure and backbone dynamics that add significantly to the understanding of the J-domain-Hsp70-EEVD mechanism of interaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Biological context
Molecular chaperones play a central role in protein homeostasis, including assistance in macromolecular complex assembly, protein transport, aggregate dissociation and refolding of stress-denatured proteins, and targeting misfolded proteins for proteolytic degradation (O. Tiroli-Cepeda & H.I. Ramos, 2011). The Hsp70 (70 kDa heat shock protein) family is ubiquitous and participates in all of the biological processes mentioned above (Hartl 1996; Kim et al. 2013; O. Tiroli-Cepeda & H.I. Ramos, 2011). As a matter of fact, the proteostasis process depends on the functional interaction between Hsp70 and Hsp40 (Liu et al. 2020). Co-chaperones from the Hsp40 family (also named J-proteins) are characterized by the presence of the J-domain that is essential for the stimulation of the ATPase activity of Hsp70. Besides that, Hsp40s recognize and bind to unfolded or partially folded polypeptides and deliver them to Hsp70 (Kampinga et al. 2019; Pinheiro et al. 2019; Summers et al. 2009). Hsp70s have a conserved EEVD tetrapeptide at the C-terminus, which is involved in interacting with Hsp40s (Freeman et al. 1995; Yu et al. 2015).
Sis1, a class B Hsp40 from yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, binds the EEVD motif, while the class I (Ydj1) does not (Borges et al. 2012; Li et al. 2006; Yu et al. 2015), such that Sis1-EEVD interaction is required for in vitro protein refolding (Yu et al. 2015). However, the details of the interaction between EEVD motif and the J-domain remain to be understood. Here we describe the assignments of the backbone and sidechain of the J-domain (residues 1 to 81 and named Sis11 − 81) of Sis1 from S. cerevisiae in complex with the Hsp70 C-terminal EEVD motif. The results add significantly to the understanding of J-domain-Hsp70-EEVD mechanism of interaction.
Methods and experiments
Protein expression and purification were carried out as previously reported (Pinheiro et al. 2019). For isotopic labeling, M9 minimal medium was supplemented with 15 N ammonium chloride (1 g/L) and 13 C glucose (3 g/L) as the sole nitrogen and carbon sources.The octapeptide GPTIEEVD referring to the C-terminal tail of Hsp70 was synthesized and purified by GenOne Biotechnologies (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). All NMR spectra were recorded in 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), 200 mM NaCl and 10% D2O supplemented with 250 µM PMSF, 5 mM sodium azide, and 2 mM EDTA to improve protein stability and avoid degradation. The concentrations of Sis11 − 81 and EEVD-peptide used in the data collection were 1 mM and 4 mM, respectively.
NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III HD 900 MHz spectrometer equipped with an inverse-detection triple resonance z-gradient TXI probe. All experiments were performed at 298 K. Resonance assignments for backbone were obtained from the following experiments: 2D [1 H,15 N] HSQC, 3D HNCO, 3D HNCA, 3D HNCACB, 3D CBCA(CO)NH and 3D HBHA(CO)NH (Gal et al. 2011; Grzesiek and Bax 1993; Ikura et al. 1990; Wittekind and Mueller 1993). To assign the aliphatic sidechain, 2D [1 H,13 C] HSQC, 3D (H)CCH-TOCSY, 3D H(C)CH-TOCSY, 15 N and 13 C-edited NOESY-HSQC (for both aliphatic and aromatic regions) experiments (Kay et al. 1993; Logan et al. 1992; Sattler 1999). NOE distance restraints obtained from 15 N- and 13 C-edited NOESY spectra were acquired with a mixing time of 100 ms. Triple-resonance experiments were achieved using non-uniform sampling (NUS), with sampling rates between 8 and 20%. 2D [1 H-15 N] HSQC spectra were acquired before and after each 3D experiment to confirm the stability of the protein sample. NMR data wereprocessed with NMRpipe (Delaglio et al. 1995) and analyzed with CcpNmr Analysis (Vranken et al. 2005) available on the NMRbox platform (Maciejewski et al. 2017).
Extent of assignments and data deposition
The Sis11 − 81:EEVD assigned backbone amide peaks are shown in the 2D [1 H-15 N] HSQC spectrum in Fig. 1 and refer to 100% of all possible amide H and amide N atoms (excluding the six prolines), 100% of all Cα atoms, 98.7% of all Cβ atoms and 91.6% of all CO atoms. At the end of the experiment, 96.4% of the backbone atoms were assigned. Considering all sidechain atoms, about 78.2% were assigned (77.5% of 13 C and 78.6% of 1 H). The chemical shift data is available at the Biological Magnetic Resonance Bank (https://www.bmrb.wisc.edu) and has the accession number 51,187. Note that there are unassigned minor peaks in the 2D [1 H-15 N] HSQC, possibly due to conformational exchange.
The order parameter (S2) and the secondary structures were predicted from the ensemble of backbone chemical shifts (13Cα, 13Cβ, 13CO, 15 N and 1HN) of Sis11 − 81, both in the free and in the bound-state, Sis11 − 81:EEVD, using TALOS-N (Berjanskii and Wishart 2005; Shen and Bax 2013), shown in Fig. 2. S2 value is an indicator of flexibility and its analysis indicated that the bound state, Sis11 − 81:EEVD, had higher flexibility between residues 32 and 40 when compared to the free state (Fig. 2a). This loop contains the HSP70 interaction 34-HPD-36 motif. The decrease in S2 correlates with a significant change in 13Cα, 13Cb and 13CO chemical shifts for this region in the bound state. The subtle change in helical propensity for residues K37 and P38 was not explained by the chemical shift changes. Secondary structure analysis indicated that five α-helices (α1 6–11, α2 19–33, α3 42–56, α4 58–66, and α5 69–74) were predicted with high confidence and that there is no evidence of any β-strand conformation in the protein (Fig. 2b,c). The difference in predicted secondary structure propensities was identified between free Sis11 − 81 and Sis11 − 81:EEVD, but they are small and mainly located at the first helix (residues 6–11). These data will enable us to characterize mechanistic details of the Sis11 − 81:EEVD interaction in future studies.
Data Availability
The backbone assignments of Sis11 − 81:EEVD have been deposited in the Biological Magnetic Resonance Bank (https://www.bmrb.wisc.edu) under the accession number 51,187.
References
Berjanskii Mv, Wishart DS (2005) A simple method to predict protein flexibility using secondary Chemical Shifts. J Am Chem Soc 127(43):14970–14971. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja054842f
Borges JC, Seraphim Tv, Mokry DZ, Almeida FCL, Cyr DM, Ramos CHI (2012) Identification of regions involved in substrate binding and Dimer stabilization within the central domains of yeast Hsp40 Sis1. PLoS ONE 7(12):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050927
Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GeertenW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A (1995) NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00197809
Freeman BC, Myers MP, Schumacher R, Morimoto RI (1995) Identification of a regulatory motif in Hsp70 that affects ATPase activity, substrate binding and interaction with HDJ-1. EMBO J 14(10):2281–2292
Gal M, Edmonds KA, Milbradt AG, Takeuchi K, Wagner G (2011) Speeding up direct 15 N detection: hCaN 2D NMR experiment. J Biomol NMR 51(4):497–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-011-9580-7
Grzesiek S, Bax A (1993) Amino acid type determination in the sequential assignment procedure of uniformly 13 C/15 N-enriched proteins. J Biomol NMR 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00178261
Hartl FU (1996) Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature 381(6583):571–580. https://doi.org/10.1038/381571a0
Ikura M, Kay LE, Bax A (1990) A novel approach for sequential assignment of proton, carbon-13, and nitrogen-15 spectra of larger proteins: heteronuclear triple-resonance three-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. Application to calmodulin. Biochemistry 29(19):4659–4667. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00471a022
Kampinga HH, Andreasson C, Barducci A, Cheetham ME, Cyr D, Emanuelsson C, Genevaux P, Gestwicki JE, Goloubinoff P, Huerta-Cepas J, Kirstein J, Liberek K, Mayer MP, Nagata K, Nillegoda NB, Pulido P, Ramos C, de los Rios P, Rospert S, …, Marszalek J (2019) Function, evolution, and structure of J-domain proteins. Cell Stress Chaperones 24(1):7–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12192-018-0948-4
Kay LE, Xu GY, Singer AU, Muhandiram DR, Formankay JD (1993) A gradient-enhanced HCCH-TOCSY experiment for Recording side-chain 1H and 13 C correlations in H2O samples of proteins. J Magn Reson Ser B 101(3):333–337. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmrb.1993.1053
Kim YE, Hipp MS, Bracher A, Hayer-Hartl M, Ulrich Hartl F (2013) Molecular chaperone functions in protein folding and Proteostasis. Annu Rev Biochem 82(1):323–355. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060208-092442
Li J, Wu Y, Qian X, Sha B (2006) Crystal structure of yeast Sis1 peptide-binding fragment and Hsp70 Ssa1 C-terminal complex. Biochem J 398(3):353–360. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20060618
Liu Q, Liang C, Zhou L (2020) Structural and functional analysis of the Hsp70/Hsp40 chaperone system. Protein Sci 29(2):378–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3725
Logan TM, Olejniczak ET, Xu RX, Fesik SW (1992) Side chain and backbone assignments in isotopically labeled proteins from two heteronuclear triple resonance experiments. FEBS Lett 314(3):413–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(92)81517-P
Maciejewski MW, Schuyler AD, Gryk MR, Moraru II, Romero PR, Ulrich EL, Eghbalnia HR, Livny M, Delaglio F, Hoch JC (2017) NMRbox: a resource for Biomolecular NMR computation. Biophys J 112(8):1529–1534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.03.011
Pinheiro GMS, Amorim GC, Iqbal A, Almeida FCL, Ramos CHI (2019) Solution NMR investigation on the structure and function of the isolated J-domain from Sis1: evidence of transient inter-domain interactions in the full-length protein. Arch Biochem Biophys 669:71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2019.05.020
Sattler M (1999) Heteronuclear multidimensional NMR experiments for the structure determination of proteins in solution employing pulsed field gradients. Progress Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 34(2):93–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6565(98)00025-9
Shen Y, Bax A (2013) Protein backbone and sidechain torsion angles predicted from NMR chemical shifts using artificial neural networks. J Biomol NMR 56(3):227–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-013-9741-y
Summers DW, Douglas PM, Ramos CHI, Cyr DM (2009) Polypeptide transfer from Hsp40 to Hsp70 molecular chaperones. Trends Biochem Sci 34(5):230–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2008.12.009
Tiroli-Cepeda O, A., Ramos HI, C (2011) An overview of the role of Molecular Chaperones in protein homeostasis. Protein & Peptide Letters 18(2):101–109. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986611794475093
Vranken WF, Boucher W, Stevens TJ, Fogh RH, Pajon A, Llinas M, Ulrich EL, Markley JL, Ionides J, Laue ED (2005) The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 59(4):687–696. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20449
Wittekind M, Mueller L (1993) HNCACB, a high-sensitivity 3D NMR experiment to Correlate Amide-Proton and Nitrogen Resonances with the alpha- and Beta-Carbon Resonances in Proteins. J Magn Reson Ser B 101(2):201–205. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmrb.1993.1033
Yu HY, Ziegelhoffer T, Osipiuk J, Ciesielski SJ, Baranowski M, Zhou M, Joachimiak A, Craig EA (2015) Roles of intramolecular and intermolecular interactions in functional regulation of the Hsp70 J-protein Co-Chaperone Sis1. J Mol Biol 427(7):1632–1643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2015.02.007
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the National Center of Magnetic Resonance (CNRMN/UFRJ, https://www.cenabio.ufrj.br/index.php) for the data acquisition. This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP (2012/50161-8; 2017/26131-5).), CNPq (305148-2019-2 and 313517/2021-5) and Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro FAPERJ (273303, 204432 and 267010). The following authors received a research fellowship from FAPESP: COM (2019/16114-1), and GMSP (2017/01074-9; 2018/11948-9). The assignments were deposited at the Biomagnetic Resonance Data Bank (BMRB ID 51187).
Funding
This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP (2012/50161-8; 2017/26131-5).), CNPq (305148-2019-2 and 313517/2021-5) and Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro FAPERJ (273303, 204432 and 267010). The following authors received a research fellowship from FAPESP: COM (2019/16114-1), and GMSP (2017/01074-9; 2018/11948-9).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Data collection, analysis, and interpretation: COM, FCLA. Data analysis and interpretation and design of the work: COM, GMSP, CHIR.; FCLA. This work results from the collaboration of two research groups: Laboratory of Biochemistry of the Chaperome (PI CHIR) and Biomolecular NMR Laboratory (PI FCLA). All authors: drafted and critically reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors have agreed to the publication of the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Matos, C.O., Pinheiro, G.M., Ramos, C.H.I. et al. Backbone and sidechain NMR assignments of residues 1–81 from yeast Sis1 in complex with an Hsp70 C-terminal EEVD peptide. Biomol NMR Assign 17, 239–242 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12104-023-10148-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12104-023-10148-0