Abstract
Chronic stress (CS) during early life represents a major risk factor for the development of mental disorders, including depression. According to the Two/Multiple-Hit hypothesis, the etiology of neuropsychiatric disorders usually involves multiple stressors experienced subsequently during different phases of life. However, the molecular and cellular mechanisms modulating neuronal and behavioral changes induced by multiple stress experiences are just poorly understood. Since the oxytocinergic and vasopressinergic systems are neuroendocrine modulators involved in environmentally driven adaptations of stress sensitivity we hypothesized that postnatal CS programs oxytocinergic and vasopressinergic receptor expression changes in response to a second stress exposure in young adulthood. First we investigated if postnatal CS (maternal separation + social isolation) induces depressive-like behavior and alters oxytocin receptor (OxtR) and arginine vasopressin receptor type 1a (AvpR1a) gene expression in the hippocampus (HC) of male mice and (2) if a second single stressor (forced swimming, FS) in young adulthood affects gene expression of OxtR and AvpR1a at adulthood dependent on CS pre-experience. We found that postnatal CS induced depressive-like behavior and enhanced AvpR1a expression in HC at young adulthood. Moreover, in line with our hypothesis, only combined stress exposure (CS + FS), but not CS or FS alone, resulted in increased gene expression of OxtR in HC at adulthood. In contrast, AvpR1a expression was decreased in both adult FS and CS + FS animals. Overall, our results provide evidence that CS programs neuroendocrine systems and thereby influences stress responses in later life periods.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Perinatal adverse experiences critically influence the maturation of brain structure and function and therefore represent a major risk factor for the development of psychopathological behavior, such as depression, in later life periods [1–7]. In this context it has to be considered that the environmentally driven development of psychopathologies is a multistep process, as stated in the cumulative or diathesis stress hypothesis [8–12]. Based on this classical theory, the Two- (or Multiple-) Hit concept proposes that neuropsychiatric diseases are the result of two (or more) stressors experienced over the lifespan. In this model it is hypothesized that adverse events, such as childhood trauma or chronic stress, exert programming effects on the nervous system, which in consequence predisposes an individual to develop stress-related disorders in response to second or multiple stress exposures during later life [13–20].
Several studies have shown that early postnatal adverse experiences, such as maternal separation or chronic stress, can result in depressive-like behavior in adulthood as well as in enhanced stress sensitivity/reactivity [5, 19, 21–24]. Furthermore, traumatized individuals tend to show deficits/difficulties in behavioral stress coping strategies during stressful situations (second hit events) later in life [21].
There is emerging evidence that the impact of adverse life events on the development of stress responsiveness and sensitivity not only depends on the function of the classical stress hormones such as ACTH and CORT, but is also modulated by the hypothalamic hormones oxytocin (Oxt) and arginine vasopressin (Avp) [25–29]. It is assumed that a well-balanced interplay between the two systems is crucial for the functional activity of hypothalamic and limbic circuitries and thereby important for the regulation of stress responses and emotional behavior [30, 31].
Oxt and Avp are released into the blood stream by magnocellular neurons in the hypothalamic supraoptic and paraventricular nucleus. In addition, Oxt and potentially also Avp neurons target a number of brain areas directly via axonal contacts, in particular areas, which are implicated in reward (VTA, NAc, mPFC), stress (hippocampus, amygdala) and maternal behavior (olfactory bulb, BNST, MPOA) [30, 32]. The neuronal effects are mediated by their respective receptors, the oxytocin receptor (OxtR) and the arginine vasopressin receptor type 1a and 1b (AvpR1a, AvpR1b) [33, 34]. In the present study, we focused on the hippocampus (HC), an area involved in the regulation of the stress response and emotional behavior and where both OxtR as well as AvpR are quite numerous [35]. Moreover, the development and maturation of the hippocampus appears to be particularly sensitive to the quality of parental care [36] and acute and chronic stress exposure [19, 20]. Additionally, it is known that gene expression in the HC can be altered by a variety of different stressors [37] but it still remains unclear how and to which extent these changes endure beyond a stressful experience and can be altered by further stressors during lifetime.
Thus, the aim of the present study was to test the hypotheses (1) that postnatal CS induces depressive-like behavior and in parallel alters the expression of OxtR and AvpR1a expression in the HC and (2) that postnatal CS might alter the susceptibility of the Oxt and Avp systems towards a second stress experience later in life.
Material and Methods
Animals
C57BL/6 mice (Taconic Biosciences A/S, Denmark) were housed on a 12-h light-dark cycle with access to water and food ad libitum. Home cages containing nesting material were cleaned once a week in order to minimize handling-induced stress. After birth of the pups (defined as postnatal day 0; PND 0) the home cages were not cleaned during the first two weeks to reduce stress for dams and pups. The experimental protocols were approved by the ethics committee of the government of the state of Saxony-Anhalt according to the German guidelines for the care and use of animals in laboratory research (§8 TSchG; AZ: 42,502–2-1272).
Stress Paradigm
Control (CON)
Pups were reared together with their mother without disturbance except of the above-mentioned cleaning routine. After weaning at PND 21 the offspring were housed together in same-sex groups with up to 5 individuals until the time of the respective experiment.
Chronic Postnatal Stress (CS; “1st Hit”)
Chronic stress was applied by combining daily maternal separation from PND 1 to PND 21, and subsequent rearing in social isolation. For maternal separation, pups were removed from the home cage and isolated individually in boxes of a size of 13 × 13 cm for 3 h (09:00–12:00 a.m.), allowing for auditory and olfactory, but not for body contact. For separation during the first week the isolation boxes were placed in a humidified incubator at 32 °C. During separation the dam remained in the home cage but all nesting material was removed. Upon return of the pups new nesting material was provided. On PND 21 animals were weaned 2 h after the last separation and housed individually until the time of the respective experiment.
Forced Swimming (FS; “2nd Hit”)
Forced swimming at young adulthood (details see below) served as second stressor (“2nd hit”) and was additionally used to test for depressive-like behavior.
Male animals of the control and the CS group were randomly assigned to the following experimental groups. The developmental periods “young adulthood” (PND 62–64) and “adulthood” (PND 100) were defined after Olazábal [38].
PND 64 CON: Young adult control animals (PND 64) not exposed to any stressor.
PND 64 CS: Young adult animals (PND 64) exposed to CS.
PND 100 CON: Adult control animals (PND 100) not exposed to any stressor.
PND 100 CS: Adult animals (PND 100) only exposed to CS.
PND 100 FS: Adult animals (PND 100) only exposed to forced swimming at young adulthood.
PND 100 CS + FS: Adult animals (PND 100) exposed to ELS (“1st hit”) and forced swimming (“2nd hit”) at young adulthood.
Behavioral Tests
In order to test if CS induces a depressive-like phenotype, the animals were tested for two depressive-like behaviors: (1) learned helplessness, indicated by increased floating time during forced swimming compared to controls and (2) anhedonia, indicated by reduced consumption of sucrose solution during the sucrose preference test compared to controls.
Forced Swimming (FS)
Forced swimming to test for learned helplessness was performed on PND 62 and 63. On both days the animals were placed into a glass tank filled with water at 22 °C and forced to swim for 15 min (habituation). Afterwards they were returned to the home cage for 24 h. On the second day behavior was videotaped and the duration of active swimming and passive floating during the first 5 min of the test was analyzed (Noldus, Observer XT software, Wageningen, Netherlands). Results of individual animals were used for analysis.
Sucrose Test (SPT)
The sucrose preference test was performed at PND 77–80 in the animals´ home cages. One the first day animals were provided with two bottles of water for habituation and to determine the side preference (measured as higher volume of consumed water). On the second day, water bottles were weighed and the water bottle on the less preferred side was replaced by a bottle containing 4 % sucrose. Sucrose solution was available for the animals for 48 h. Sucrose preference was determined by calculating the consumed volumes per animal. Litter means were used for analysis.
Gene Expression Analysis
Male animals of all experimental groups were sacrificed by decapitation on PND 64 and PND 100, respectively. Left and right HC were dissected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. RNA extraction of one hemisphere was performed using the RNeasy Mini kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany). Genomic DNA was removed using the RNase-free DNase kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany).
Analysis of RNA samples was performed using the Multiplex RT-PCR Kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany), allowing to perform simultaneous one-step quantitative real-time PCR of 2 to 5 target genes using TaqMan gene expression assays (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, United States). Commercially available assays for the oxytocin receptor (OxtR; Mm01182684_m1; FAM), and the arginine vasopression receptor type 1a (AvpR1a; Mm00444092_m1; FAM) as target genes and hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase I (Hprt I; Mm01545399_m1; VIC) as reference gene, were used. Gene expression of OxtR, AvpR1a and Hprt in the HC was calculated using the delta-delta CT method and samples were normalized to their respective control groups. Data present the analysis of individual animals.
Statistics
Results of the behavioral and gene expression analysis were tested for significance using two-sided unpaired t-test. Data from gene expression analysis were normalized to controls.
Data are presented as means + SEM. Significance value was set as follows: * p ≤ 0,05; ** p ≤ 0,01. Graphs were made using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (GraphPad, LaJolla, California, United States).
Gene Expression
-
A)
Oxytocin receptor
No significant differences in OxtR gene expression could be detected in young adult CS animals (PND 64 CS; Fig. 2a). In adult animals only the consecutive exposure to CS as “first hit” and FS as “second hit” (PND 100 CS + FS), but neither CS (PND 100 CS) nor FS (PND 100 FS) alone, resulted in significant increases of OxtR (p = 0,02, Fig. 2b).
-
B)
Arginine vasopressin receptor type 1a
T-test revealed that AvpR1a expression in the HC of young adult CS animals (PND 64 CS) was significantly increased compared to controls (p = 0,02; Fig. 2a). This effect was not detectable anymore in adult CS animals (PND 100 CS; Fig. 2b). However, adult animals subjected to FS (PND 100 FS) or CS + FS (PND 100 CS + FS) displayed significantly decreased Avpr1a expression compared to naive controls (p < 0,001; p = 0,005, respectively; Fig. 2b).
Discussion
Adverse experiences during early life periods can program an individual’s sensitivity, responsiveness and reactivity towards stressful events later in life. The present study in male mice revealed that exposure to CS in early life induced depressive-like behavior paralleled by a transient increase of AvpR1a gene expression in the HC at young adulthood, which is supporting the concept that early adversities can interfere with behavioral and brain functional development. Furthermore, our data indicate that CS exerts a long-term programming impact on changes of OxtR and AvpR1a gene expression in response to a second stressor later in life: Only CS combined with a subsequent second stress exposure (FS) at young adulthood, but neither CS nor FS alone, induced elevated OxtR gene expression in the HC at adulthood. In contrast, AvpR1a expression was reduced by FS alone, an effect that was slightly alleviated by pre-exposure to CS.
Oxt and Avp have been shown to exert regulatory effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, the major stress response system. The modulatory action is based on a functional interplay between Oxt and Avp and it is proposed that they mediate opposing effects [30]: whereas Oxt release is thought to be associated with an attenuation of stress-induced HPA axis activity [39] and thereby linked to anxiolytic and antidepressive functions [40], Avp may act in opposite direction exerting anxiogenic and depressive functions [41].
Both neuropeptides are released peripherally into the bloodstream and can thereby modulate brain [30] and cardiovascular [42] functions in a hormone-like manner. In addition, these neuropeptides also exert direct actions in multiple brain regions via axonal and dendritic release [31, 43–46]. The central effects of Oxt and Avp in the brain are mediated by their respective receptors, OxtR and AvpR1a, which are expressed in a number of brain regions including cortical and limbic areas that are involved in the control of emotional and social behaviors [33, 34]. In the hippocampal formation OxtR are found predominantly on the soma and on dendrites of GABAergic interneurons and it has been shown that their activation increases the firing rate of the interneurons resulting in suppressed activity of pyramidal neurons [47, 48] and in enhanced cortical information transfer while simultaneously lowering background activity and improved information processing [49]. Similarly, Avp fibers as well as AvpR1a receptors are present in all areas of the hippocampal formation [50]. Avp fibers make asymmetric (presumably excitatory) synaptic contacts with pyramidal neuron dendrites, dendritic spines and with axonal spines, while on interneuron dendrites they make symmetric (presumably inhibitory) synaptic contacts [50].
CS Induces Depressive-like Behavior and Elevates Hippocampal AvpR1a Gene Expression
The depressive-like behaviors, i.e. symptoms of learned helplessness and anhedonia, observed in young adult CS-exposed animals were paralleled by elevated AvpR1a gene expression in the HC at this age. This is in line with findings from a receptor binding study demonstrating that maternal separation stress resulted in increased AvpR1a receptor binding in the dentate gyrus of adolescent male rats [51]. The elevated AvpR1a gene expression in our CS exposed animals may be at least in part responsible for the observed depressive-like behavioral symptoms since it was shown that Avp can evoke anxiogenic actions and thereby increase anxiety- and depression-related behaviors [30]. Moreover, it is tempting to speculate that the upregulation of hippocampal AvpR1a gene expression may result in hippocampal hyperexcitability and thereby might sensitize the responsiveness of this brain region towards a second stressor. This is supported by studies showing that Avp-induced long-term potentiation may lead to a long-lasting enhancement of hippocampal excitability [52, 53], which on the brain systems level may lead to dysfunctional limbic pathways.
CS Programs Oxt and Avp Receptor Changes in Response to a Second Stressor at later Life Periods
In contrast to the findings in young adulthood no changes of AvpR1a expression could be detected in adult animals after chronic stress, indicating a transient overexpression of these receptors. A study by Gray et al., (2012) could show that the central arginine vasopressin V1a receptor is mediating the normal habituation of the HPA axis responses to repeated stress exposure [54]. Therefore, it is possible that the transient overexpression of AvpR1a is also due to a habituation effect mediated by Avp itself. However, AvpR1a expression in adult animals was significantly decreased by FS alone as well as by the exposure to FS + CS, although the effect was slightly alleviated in the CS + FS animals. Several studies have shown that forced swimming triggers the activation of the brain AVP system resulting in increased release of AVP in several subregions [55, 56]. To regulate the stress response adequately, a counter-regulation of the Avp receptor density might be a possible explanation for the reduction in AvpR1a gene expression.
While CS or FS alone did not alter OxtR expression in adult animals, the combination of both stressors resulted in increased expression of this receptor in the HC. It is tempting to speculate that this effect may be an adaptive response to alterations in Oxt release during the 2nd stress experience. Evidence for this interpretation is derived from studies reporting that forced swimming enhances hypothalamic Oxt release, an effect that was amplified by repeated stress exposure [41, 56]. These findings can be interpreted within the framework of the cumulative or diathesis-stress-model, which is based upon the assumption that individual genetic traits/polymorphisms in interaction with environmental factors, including stress, define an individual’s predisposition and susceptibility towards stressful events throughout life [8, 10, 11, 18]. A recent study by Gray et al. [37] investigated the effects of chronic stress when paired with a novel stressor and could show that changes in gene expression patterns were significantly different depending on the history and type of stress experience: naive single stressors led to different gene expression activation patterns than a combination of different stressors indicating that a history of stress can indeed permanently alter stress susceptibility and gene expression patterns in the hippocampus [37].
Moreover, the programming effect of CS, as found in our study, may be viewed within the context of the hormonal imprinting hypothesis [57], which assumes that the first encounter between a hormone and its developing target cell receptor, particularly when this occurs during sensitive perinatal phases, determines and programs hormone production, receptor-binding and signal transduction capacity at later life periods [58–60]. However, the detailed mechanisms, particularly the epigenetic regulation, of these hormonally induced programming effects have to be investigated in further studies.
Taken together our study provides further evidence that the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders, such as depression or disturbed stress coping later in life, may be caused by a combination and interaction of multiple stressors experienced throughout different life periods.
ACTH, adrenocorticotropin-releasing hormone; Avp, arginine vasopressin; AvpR1a/b, arginine vasopressin receptor type 1a/b; BNST, bed nucleus stria terminalis; CON, control; CORT, corticosterone; CS, early-life stress; FS, forced swimming; HC, hippocampus; HPA, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis; Hprt, hxpoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase; mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; MPOA, medial preoptic area; MS, maternal separation; NAc, nucleus accumbens; SPT, sucrose preference test; Oxt, oxytocin; OxtR, oxytocin receptor; PND, postnatal day; VTA, ventral tegmental area.
References
Bock J, Wainstock T, Braun K, Segal M (2015) Stress in utero: prenatal programming of brain plasticity and cognition. Biol Psychiatry 78:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.02.036
Bock J, Rether K, Gröger N, et al. (2014) Perinatal programming of emotional brain circuits: an integrative view from systems to molecules. Front Neurosci 8:1–16. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00011
Heim C, Shugart M, Craighead WE, Nemeroff CB (2010) Neurobiological and psychiatric consequences of child abuse and neglect. Dev Psychobiol 52:671–690. doi:10.1002/dev.20494
Yam K, Naninck EFG, Schmidt M V, et al (2015) Stress : The International Journal on the Biology of Stress Early-life adversity programs emotional functions and the neuroendocrine stress system : the contribution of nutrition, metabolic hormones and epigenetic mechanisms Early-life adversity programs. doi: 10.3109/10253890.2015.1064890
Pryce CR, Rüedi-Bettschen D, Dettling AC, et al. (2005) Long-term effects of early-life environmental manipulations in rodents and primates: potential animal models in depression research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:649–674. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.03.011
Heim C, Binder EB (2012) Current research trends in early life stress and depression: review of human studies on sensitive periods, gene–environment interactions, and epigenetics. Exp Neurol 233:102–111. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.10.032
Lupien SJ, McEwen BS, Gunnar MR, Heim C (2009) Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:434–445. doi:10.1038/nrn2639
Nederhof E, Schmidt MV (2012) Mismatch or cumulative stress: toward an integrated hypothesis of programming effects. Physiol Behav 106:691–700. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.12.008
McEwen BS (1998) Stress, adaptation, and disease. Ann New York Acad Sci:33–44. doi:10.1080/01422419908228843
Monroe SM, Simons AD (1991) Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research: implications for the depressive disorders. Psychol Bull 110(3):406–425
Mc Elroy S, Hevey D (2014) Relationship between adverse early experiences, stressors, psychosocial resources and wellbeing. Child Abuse Negl 38:65–75. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.07.017
Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van IJzendoorn MH (2015) The hidden efficacy of interventions: Gene × Environment experiments from a differential susceptibility perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 66:381–409. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015407
Worlein JM (2014) Nonhuman primate models of depression: effects of early experience and stress. ILAR J 55:259–273. doi:10.1093/ilar/ilu030
Hill RA, Von Soly SK, Ratnayake U, et al. (2014) Long-term effects of combined neonatal and adolescent stress on brain-derived neurotrophic factor and dopamine receptor expression in the rat forebrain. Biochim Biophys Acta - Mol Basis Dis 1842:2126–2135
Hill RA, Klug M, Von Soly K, Szerenke B, Michele D, Hannan AJ, van den Buuse M (2014) Sex-specific disruptions in spatial memory and anhedonia in a “two hit” rat model correspond with alterations in hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression and signaling. Hippocampus 24:1197–1211. doi:10.1002/hipo.22302
Horovitz O, Tsoory MM, Yovell Y (2014) A rat model of pre-puberty ( Juvenile ) stress- induced predisposition to stress-related disorders : Sex similarities and sex differences in effects and symptoms A rat model of pre-puberty ( Juvenile ) stress-induced predisposition. World J Biol Psychiatry 36–48. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2012.745604
Tsoory M, Cohen H, Richter-Levin G (2007) Juvenile stress induces a predisposition to either anxiety or depressive-like symptoms following stress in adulthood. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 17:245–256. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2006.06.007
Daskalakis NP, Bagot RC, Parker KJ, et al. (2013) The three-hit concept of vulnerability and resilience: toward understanding adaptation to early-life adversity outcome. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38:1858–1873. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.06.008
McEwen BS (2003) Early life influences on life-long patterns of behavior and health. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 9:149–154. doi:10.1002/mrdd.10074
McEwen BS (2012) Brain on stress: how the social environment gets under the skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:17180–17185. doi:10.1073/pnas.1121254109
Nishi M, Horii-Hayashi N, Sasagawa T (2014) Effects of early life adverse experiences on the brain: implications from maternal separation models in rodents. Front Neurosci 8:1–6. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00166
Millstein RA, Holmes A (2007) Effects of repeated maternal separation on anxiety- and depression-related phenotypes in different mouse strains. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 31:3–17. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.05.003
Meaney MJ (2001) Maternal care gene expression, and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:1161–1192
Heim C, Newport DJ, Mletzko T, et al (2008) The link between childhood trauma and depression : Insights from HPA axis studies in humans. Psychoneuroendocrinology 693–710. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.03.008
Grimm S, Pestke K, Feeser M, et al. (2014) Early life stress modulates oxytocin effects on limbic system during acute psychosocial stress. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 9:1828–1835. doi:10.1093/scan/nsu020
Fan Y, Pestke K, Feeser M, et al. (2015) Amygdala–hippocampal connectivity changes during acute psychosocial stress: joint effect of early life stress and oxytocin. Neuropsychopharmacology 40:2736–2744. doi:10.1038/npp.2015.123
Murgatroyd C, Wu Y, Bockmühl Y, Spengler D (2010) Genes learn from stress: how infantile trauma programs us for depression. Epigenetics 5:194–199. doi:10.4161/epi.5.3.11375
Murgatroyd CA, Nephew BC (2013) Effects of early life social stress on maternal behavior and neuroendocrinology. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38:219–228. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.05.020
Veenema AH (2012) Toward understanding how early-life social experiences alter oxytocin- and vasopressin-regulated social behaviors. Horm Behav 61:304–312. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.12.002
Neumann ID, Landgraf R (2012) Balance of brain oxytocin and vasopressin: implications for anxiety, depression, and social behaviors. Trends Neurosci 35:649–659. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2012.08.004
Landgraf R, Neumann ID (2004) Vasopressin and oxytocin release within the brain: a dynamic concept of multiple and variable modes of neuropeptide communication. Front Neuroendocrinol 25:150–176. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2004.05.001
Rutherford HJV, Williams SK, Moy S, et al. (2011) Disruption of maternal parenting circuitry by addictive process: rewiring of reward and stress systems. Front Psychiatry 2:1–17. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2011.00037
Feldman R, Monakhov M, Pratt M, Ebstein RP (2015) Oxytocin pathway genes: evolutionary ancient system impacting on human affiliation, sociality, and psychopathology. Biol Psychiatry. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.08.008
Grinevich V, Sophie Knobloch-Bollmann H, Eliava M, et al (2015) Assembling the Puzzle: Pathways of Oxytocin Signaling in the Brain. Biol Psychiatry 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.04.013
Liberzon I, Young EA (1997) Effects of stress and glucocorticoids on CNS oxytocin receptor binding. Psychoneuroendocrinology 22:411–422. doi:10.1016/S0306-4530(97)00045-0
Grace CE, Kim SJ, Rogers JM (2011) Maternal influences on epigenetic programming of the developing hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Birth Defects Res Part A - Clin Mol Teratol 91:797–805. doi:10.1002/bdra.20824
Gray JD, Rubin TG, Hunter RG, McEwen BS (2014) Hippocampal gene expression changes underlying stress sensitization and recovery. Mol Psychiatry 19:1171–1178. doi:10.1038/mp.2013.175
Olazábal DE, Alsina-Llánes M (2015) Are age and sex differences in brain oxytocin receptors related to maternal and infanticidal behavior in naïve mice? Horm Behav. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.04.006
Neumann ID (2002) Chapter 12 Involvement of the brain oxytocin system in stress coping: interactions with the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. In: Research BT-P in B (ed) Vasopressin Oxytocin From Genes to Clin. Appl. Elsevier, pp 147–162
Kirsch P, Esslinger C, Chen Q, et al. (2005) Oxytocin modulates neural circuitry for social cognition and fear in humans. J Neurosci 25:11489–11493. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3984-05.2005
Engelmann M, Landgraf R, Wotjak CT (2004) The hypothalamic-neurohypophysial system regulates the hypothalamic- pituitary-adrenal axis under stress: an old concept revisited. Front Neuroendocrinol 25:132–149. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2004.09.001
Gutkowska J, Jankowski M (2012) Oxytocin revisited: its role in cardiovascular regulation. J Neuroendocrinol 24:599–608. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02235.x
Onaka T, Takayanagi Y, Yoshida M (2012) Roles of oxytocin neurones in the control of stress, energy metabolism, and social behaviour. J Neuroendocrinol 24:587–598. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2826.2012.02300.x
Bichet DG (2014) Central vasopressin: dendritic and axonal secretion and renal actions. Clin Kidney J 7:242–247. doi:10.1093/ckj/sfu050
Knobloch HS, Grinevich V (2014) Evolution of oxytocin pathways in the brain of vertebrates. Front Behav Neurosci 8:31. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00031
Sofroniew MV (1983) Morphology of vasopressin and oxytocin neurones and their central and vascular projections. Prog Brain Res 60:101–114
Mühlethaler M, Charpak S, Dreifuss JJ (1984) Contrasting effects of neurohypophysial peptides on pyramidal and non-pyramidal neurones in the rat hippocampus. Brain Res 308:97–107. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(84)90921-1
Zaninetti M, Raggenbass M (2000) Oxytocin receptor agonists enhance inhibitory synaptic transmission in the rat hippocampus by activating interneurons in stratum pyramidale. Eur J Neurosci 12:3975–3984. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00290.x
Owen SF, Tuncdemir SN, Bader PL, et al. (2013) Oxytocin enhances hippocampal spike transmission by modulating fast-spiking interneurons. Nature 500:458–462. doi:10.1038/nature12330
Zhang L, Hernández VS (2013) Synaptic innervation to rat hippocampus by vasopressin-immuno-positive fibres from the hypothalamic supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei. Neuroscience 228:139–162. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.10.010
Lukas M, Bredewold R, Neumann ID, Veenema AH (2010) Maternal separation interferes with developmental changes in brain vasopressin and oxytocin receptor binding in male rats. Neuropharmacology 58:78–87. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.06.020
Chepkova AN, Kapai NA, Skrebitskii VG (2001) Arginine vasopressin fragment AVP4-9 facilitates induction of long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Bull Exp Biol Med 131:136–138. doi:10.1023/A:1017583626625
Dubrovsky B, Tatarinov A, Gijsbers K, et al. (2003) Effects of arginine-vasopressin (AVP) on long-term potentiation in intact anesthetized rats. Brain Res Bull 59:467–472. doi:10.1016/S0361-9230(02)00961-9
Gray M, Innala L, Viau V (2012) Central vasopressin V1 A receptor blockade impedes hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal habituation to repeated restraint stress exposure in adult male rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 37:2712–2719. doi:10.1038/npp.2012.136
Ebner K, Wotjak CT, Landgraf R, Engelmann M (2002) Forced swimming triggers vasopressin release within the amygdala to modulate stress-coping strategies in rats. Eur J Neurosci 15:384–388. doi:10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01869.x
Wotjak CT, Naruo T, Muraoka S, et al. (2001) Forced swimming stimulates the expression of vasopressin and oxytocin in magnocellular neurons of the rat hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. Eur J Neurosci 13:2273–2281
Csaba G (1980) Phylogeny and ontogeny of hormone receptors: the selection theory of receptor formation and hormonal imprinting. Biol Rev 55:47–63. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1980.tb00687.x
Csaba G (2011) The biological basis and clinical significance of hormonal imprinting, an epigenetic process. Clin Epigenetics 2:187–196. doi:10.1007/s13148-011-0024-8
Csaba G (2013) Hormonal imprinting in the central nervous system: causes and consequences. Orv Hetil 154:128–135. doi:10.1556/OH.2013.29533
Hashemi F, Tekes K, Laufer R, et al. (2013) Effect of a single neonatal oxytocin treatment (hormonal imprinting) on the biogenic amine level of the adult rat brain: could oxytocin-induced labor cause pervasive developmental diseases? Reprod Sci 20:1255–1263. doi:10.1177/1933719113483010
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by grants from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF; Transgen 01KR1304B to KB and UBICA 01KR1207D to JB). The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Katharina Braun and Jörg Bock equally contributed
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lesse, A., Rether, K., Gröger, N. et al. Chronic Postnatal Stress Induces Depressive-like Behavior in Male Mice and Programs second-Hit Stress-Induced Gene Expression Patterns of OxtR and AvpR1a in Adulthood. Mol Neurobiol 54, 4813–4819 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-016-0043-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-016-0043-8