Introduction

Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors (DNETs) are rare, benign glioneuronal tumors, which become manifest during childhood, and are most commonly located in the temporal lobe [1, 2]. According to the World Health Organization classification system, DNETs have been classified as grade I, and they have been included as mixed neuroglial tumors [3]. Malignant transformation of DNETs has rarely been described [4], while previous reports also suggested infrequent aggressive and recurrent behaviors [5]. As slow-growing tumors though, they have been increasingly documented as a cause of epilepsy in young children [4]. As stated by Qaddoumi et al. [6], clinically, DNETs present as seizures before the age of 20 years in patients with normal intelligence quotient. Seizures add a significant burden, since their presence affords an important risk factor for long-term disability [7]. Moreover, seizures can be at times life-threatening themselves with increasing pediatric brain malignancy survivor’s risk of suicide into adulthood [2, 8].

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs, which regulate gene expression and silence a wide range of target genes [9]. MicroRNAs impact vital cellular and physiological processes, while their aberrant expression has been linked to a plethora of serious diseases, including cancer [10]. Notably, several previous reports suggested that miRNAs are essential regulators of many of the key pathways implicated in the pathogenesis and progression of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) malignancies [1113]. Recent evidence also indicated that miRNAs can be used to detain changes in neurons, which makes them ideal putative biomarkers for central nervous system pathology [10]. Previous reports have demonstrated their use as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers as well as therapy-related targets of pediatric CNS neoplasms [11, 14, 15].

Based on these sightings, the current study was undertaken to ascertain putative miRNA signatures in pediatric DNETs to provide additional evidence regarding the early and reliable diagnosis of the disease. To our knowledge, the present report is the first to identify miRNA signatures in DNETs. Our findings seemed to provide novel insights into the potential diagnostic properties of certain miRNAs in pediatric DNETs.

Materials and methods

Patients and tumor samples

Overall, resected brain tumors were studied from children diagnosed with DNETs (n = 5) diagnosed according to the 2007 WHO criteria [16]. As controls, 17 samples were used; the FirstChoice Human Brain Reference RNA was used (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA), and 16 samples were obtained from deceased children who underwent autopsy and were not present with any brain distortion, including the following anatomic locations: cerebellum (n = 4), medulla oblongata (n = 4), parietal lobe (n = 4) and temporal lobe (n = 4). The patient cohort included two males and three females, aged from 4.02 to 12.05 years. The median age of DNET patients was 7.07 years, while the median age of the non-malignant cohort was 9 years. The patients’ clinicopathologic characteristics are presented in Table 1. All samples were snap-frozen during resection and stored at −80 °C until use. The present study was conducted with the approval of “Aghia Sophia” Children’s Hospital Ethics Committee (Protocol No. 11685/11-8-2004). Informed consent was obtained from the parents of all children included in the study.”

Table 1 Patients’ clinicopathologic characteristics

MicroRNA profiling

The miRNA profiling was performed as previously described by Braoudaki et al. [11]. Total RNA and miRNAs were extracted using the TRIzol standard protocol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and the mirVANA miRNA Isolation Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). Labeling and hybridization were carried out using the Label IT miRNA Labeling Kit (Mirus Bio LLC, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were hybridized to Applied MicroArrays (miRlink Bioarray 300054-3PK) platform, while images were scanned using Agilent Microarray Scanner (G2565CA) controlled by Agilent Scan Control 7.0 software. The total gene signals were extracted using the ImaGene 6.0 software (BioDiscovery Inc., USA). MicroRNAs were considered significantly differentially expressed (DE) if they obtained a p value <0.05 and an FDR ≤0.05.

MiRNA signature validation by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)

Expression measurements of selected miRNAs: hsa-miR-3138 and hsa-miR-1909* targets were studied in all samples screened (n = 22) with miRNA microarrays using qRT-PCR, as described in Braoudaki et al. [11]. Briefly, qRT-PCR was performed using a standard TaqMan PCR kit procedure on a LC480 LightCycler system (Roche GmbH, Switzerland). RNU44 was used as a reference gene. Relative expression was calculated using the comparative ΔΔCt method.

Statistical analysis

The multiparameter analyses were performed with MATLAB® simulation environment (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA). The two-tailed Student’s t test was used to test the mean differences between two groups. Continuous variables are expressed as median ± standard deviation unless indicated differently. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were established to evaluate the diagnostic value of deregulated miRNAs for differentiating between tumors (PAs and EPs) and controls. MiRNA expression analyses of association with clinical variables were conducted with the Kruskal–Wallis test. Time to relapse and overall survival were also analyzed from different groups of clinical variables with the Kruskal–Wallis test.

Results

MicroRNA expression and patient diagnosis

In the current study, we identified a total of 120 DE miRNAs (p < 0.05 and FDR < 0.05) in the DNET tumor group when compared to the non-malignant group of patients. Overall, the majority of the DE miRNAs observed in DNETs were down-regulated with a total of 70 miRNAs (58.3 %) exhibiting decreased expression and 50 miRNAs (41.6 %) showing increased expression (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Histogram graphical representations of the differentially expressed miRNAs between DNETs and the control group

ROC analysis

ROC analysis of all miRNAs in each tumor type, using the microarray expression data, evaluated the extent to which they could separate the tumor entity from the control group. MicroRNAs with a p < 0.05 and an AUC >0.7 were selected as successful distinguishing markers between DNETs and the control group (Fig. 2). More specifically, the ROC curves yielded the following AUCs: miR-101* (AUC = 0.81, down-regulated), miR-186* (AUC = 0.92, down-regulated), miR-1909* (AUC = 0.99, up-regulated), miR-224* (AUC = 0.86, down-regulated), miR-3138 (AUC = 0.89, down-regulated), miR-363* (AUC = 0.81, down-regulated) and miR-572 (AUC = 0.94, down-regulated) were found to discriminate DNETs from controls. In particular, miR-1909* and miR-3138 once again appeared to discriminate DNETs from controls.

Fig. 2
figure 2

ROC analysis using miRNA data. ROC curves of the most imperative DE miRNAs in DNETs identified in this study using the microarray expression data. Selected miRNAs could significantly separate control from DNET samples. In particular, miRNAs presented included miR-101* with AUC = 0.81 (a), miR-186* with AUC = 0.92 (b), miR-1909* with AUC = 0.99 (c), miR-224* with AUC = 0.86 (d), miR-3138 with AUC = 0.89 (e), miR-363* with AUC = 0.81 (f) and miR-572 with AUC = 0.94 (g)

MiRNA signature validation by qRT-PCR

We examined by qRT-PCR the expression levels of miR-3138 and miR-1909* in a total of 22 samples including the patients and control cohorts (Fig. 3). According to our results, miR-3138 was found down-regulated in all DNET samples screened, verifying the initial miRNA microarray findings. Regarding miR-1909*, qRT-PCR again verified the increased expression levels initially found in all DNET samples examined by miRNA microarrays.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Real-time expression data for miR-1909* and miR-3138; comparative diagram of miRNA expression profiles obtained using microarray experimentation and qRT-PCR. Both methods validated the expression profiles of aforementioned miRNAs

Discussion

To date, a surge of interest is shown on the role of miRNAs in cancer, since several previous reports have suggested that the deregulation of miRNA molecules can have a dramatic biological and clinical impact. In addition, as has previously been reported, miRNA expression profiles can be used to distinguish between closely related tumor tissue subtypes and might provide a consistent diagnosis of the disease. In the current study, we examined miRNA signatures in pediatric patients with DNETs in an attempt to identify putative biomarkers predictive for the diagnosis of these infrequent epileptogenic tumors, which might inflict significant neurological and cognitive damage, despite the favorable survival rates.

Specifically, herein, we compared the differential miRNA expression profiles between brain tissues resected from children diagnosed with DNETs and those collected during autopsy from diseased children that were not present with any brain distortion and were not diagnosed with any type of malignancy. Such comparisons are highly prominent, since the heterogeneity of the compared tissues might lead to the identification of putative reliable and robust miRNA biomarkers.

By performing miRNA microarrays, overall 120 differentially expressed miRNAs between DNETs and the control cohort were identified. Quantitative RT-PCR measurement was used to validate the expression levels of two miRNAs, miR-3138 and miR-1909*, whose differential expression was more pronounced. More specifically, miR-3138 was found down-regulated in the DNET cohort when compared to the control group. MiR-3138 was selected as a successful distinguishing marker between DNETs and the control cohort, according to ROC analyses findings (AUC = 0.898). To our knowledge, limited reports have been found regarding the role of miR-3138 in cancer. Zhang et al. [17] indicated that miR-3138 could enhance radioresistance in human cervical cancer cells.

Regarding miR-1909*, markedly elevated levels of expression were detected in the DNET cohort, suggesting that it might possess oncogenic activities when overexpressed. It is also noteworthy that mir-1909* was also detected following a fairly strict filtering approach in the ROC tests (AUC = 0.998), verifying the possibility that it affords a distinguishing marker between the tumor types and the normal tissues. Yet again, to the best of our knowledge, thus far, no studies are available describing the value of miR-1909* in pediatric brain malignancies, whereas inadequate reports were found regarding their role in other types of cancer. In a similar context, Della Vittoria Scarpati et al. [18] who studied miRNA signatures in locally advanced rectal cancer found that miR-1909* was significantly up-regulated in patients with less aggressive rectal cancer of tumor regression grade 1.

It is notable that by conducting ROC curves analyses, the diagnostic value of several additional miRNAs: miR-101*, miR-186*, miR-363*, miR-224*, and miR-572 was appraised with AUCs ranging from 0.807 to 0.941. Of note, all aforementioned miRNAs were found to possess tumor suppressor properties in DNETs, and for the majority of them, this is in line with other investigations which proposed similar properties in other types of cancers. For instance, previous reports have shown that miR-101* participates in the carcinogenesis and tumor progression in various cancers. More specifically, decreased levels of expression of miR-101* have been reported in natural killer/T cell lymphoma (NKTL) [19], in rhabdomyosarcoma [20] and in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma [21]. Further on, the diminished expression of miR-186* has been detected in non-small cell lung cancer [22, 23] and in bladder cancer [24]. The tumor suppressor properties of miR-363* have also been reported in hepatocellular carcinoma [25], in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [26], in NKTL [19] and in neuroblastoma tumorigenesis [27].

Our findings though are not in line with similar reports investigating the role of miR-224* and miR-572 in malignant diseases. According to selected studies, miR-574 possesses oncogenic properties in human ovarian cancer [28] and in early-stage renal cell carcinoma [29]. As far as it concerns miR-224*, it has been found overexpressed in diverse brain malignancies and notably in gliomas and medulloblastomas. More specifically, Lu et al. [30] suggested that miR-224* was associated with advanced pathological grade and was linked to inferior prognosis, while Kunder et al. [31] reported that in medulloblastomas in the WNT subgroup, significant overexpression of miR-224* was noted.

Collectively, as previously reported by Braoudaki et al. [11], it is probable if not assured that miRNAs play tissue-specific roles and do not possess global tumor properties. Therefore, it is essential to investigate their potential role in every tissue before entitling them as either oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. Herein, our findings provided novel evidence regarding the potential role of several miRNAs and markedly for miR-3138 and miR-1909* in the pathogenesis of DNETs alone. Confirmation of larger-scale prospective studies of children with DNETs and additional confirmatory experimentation are necessitated to unravel the described role of the aforementioned miRNAs.