Abstract
The production of caproic acid (CA) and hydrogen gas (H2) from organic wastewater is economically attractive. The Ruminococcaceae bacterium CPB6 has demonstrated potential for CA production from lactate-containing wastewater. However, our understanding of the effects of Fe2+ and Mg2+ on the growth and metabolism of strain CPB6 remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the impact of Fe2+ and Mg2+ on CA and H2 production, as well as on the expression of key genes involved in CA and H2 biosynthesis pathway. The results indicate that Fe2+ positively affects cell proliferation and H2 production while minimally impacting CA production. The highest levels of H2 production were achieved with the addition of 200 mg/L Fe2+. Conversely, Mg2+ significantly enhances CA and H2 production, with the optimal yield observed in a medium enriched with 300 mg/L Mg2+. Reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis reveals that Fe2+ promotes the expression of the hydrogenase gene, whereas Mg2+ has a negligible effect on hydrogenase expression. Notably, Fe2+ and Mg2+ inhibit the expression of key genes involved in CA synthesis. These findings suggest that Fe2+ enhances H2 production by boosting cell biomass and the expression of the hydrogenase gene, whereas Mg2+ improves CA and H2 production primarily by increasing cell biomass rather than influencing the expression of functional genes involved in CA biosynthesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Caproic acid (CA), a six-carbon medium-chain carboxylic acid, is a necessary ingredient for the production of alkanes and olefins in biofuels [1,2,3] and an antibacterial and anti-inflammatory agent in humans and livestock [4, 5], as well as a flavoring and feed additive [6, 7]. Traditionally, CA is obtained from fossil sources or vegetable oil through chemical processes [8, 9]. Recently, CA production through anaerobic fermentation has received more attention [10]. For example, the co-culture of rumen microorganisms with Clostridium kluyveri has shown promise in promoting CA production [11]. Nzeteu et al. showed a sustainable production of CA through a mixed culture utilizing butyric acid as the electron acceptor and lactic acid as the electron donor [12]. Dong et al. demonstrated the efficient generation of CA through anaerobic fermentation of organic waste [13]. These findings highlight the potential for resource recovery and organic waste treatment. Anaerobic fermentation also yields a significant amount of hydrogen gas (H2), providing dual benefits of clean energy production and high-value compound generation [14]. H2 is considered a favorable alternative to fossil fuels due to its lack of greenhouse gas emissions [15, 16]. Conventional methods for H2 production, such as electrolysis and steam reforming, have drawbacks in terms of CO2 emissions and high costs [17, 18]. Biohydrogen derived from organic matter offers a cost-effective and environmentally beneficial alternative [19, 20]. Currently, biohydrogen can be obtained through various methods, including photosynthetic fermentation, anaerobic fermentation, and microbial electrolysis [21,22,23]. Among these methods, anaerobic fermentation for biohydrogen production holds greater promise. This process allows for the generation of hydrogen from inexpensive organic substrates such as wastewater, mono-, di-, and tri-saccharides, as well as cheese whey and vegetable fruit wastes [24,25,26].
Metal ions play a significant role in microbial growth and metabolism. For example, Mg2+ and Ni2+ ions have been found to enhance the biomass and H2 production of Rhodobacter sphaeroides strain MDC6521 [27]. Similarly, Mg2+ and Fe2+ are major factors influencing hydrogen production in Ethanoligenens harbinense [28]. Notably, certain metal ions, including Cr, Cu, and Zn, inhibit the activity of hydrogen-generating bacteria in sludge [29]. Furthermore, Fe2+ and Ni2+ have been shown to enhance H2 and ethanol production by influencing hydrogenase activity and biomass in anaerobic continuous flow stirred reactors [30].
The Ruminococcaceae bacterium CPB6 is an anaerobic mesophilic bacterium known for its high CA production from lactate-containing wastewater with lactate as an electron donor and short chain carboxylic acids as electron acceptors [31]. However, the effects of metal ions on the growth and metabolism of strain CPB6 remain uncertain. In this study, we investigated the impact of Mg2+ and Fe2+ on the production of CA and H2 in strain CPB6 through batch fermentation. Additionally, we examined the expression of genes encoding key enzyme responsible for the synthesis of CA and hydrogen, which encompassed acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase (Thl), butyryl-CoA: acetate CoA transferase (Cat), butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase (Bcd), and [FeFe]-hydrogenase (HydE), using RT-qPCR.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Culture and Media
Strain CPB6 was isolated and preserved in our laboratory. The phylogenic analysis based on 16 S rRNA sequences and the whole genome revealed that strain CPB6 belongs to a novel clade (genus) within the family Ruminococcaceae; therefore, it has been tentatively named as Ruminococcaceae bacterium CPB6 [6]. The CM medium composition per liter was as follows: 10 g glucose, 15 g sodium lactate, 5 g peptone, 0.5 g K2HPO4, 3 g yeast extract, 3 g NaCl, 5 g sodium acetate, 1 g NH4Cl, 0.1 g MgSO4·7H2O, 5 g beef powder, 1 mL vitamin solution, 1 mL trace element solution, 0.5 ml Na-resazurin solution, 0.5 g L-Cysteine-HCl-H2O, with a pH of 6.5 ± 0.1. The anaerobic flasks were flushed with high-purity N2 (99.99%) for 5 min, sealed with rubber stoppers, and autoclaved at 115 ℃ for 20 min. Vitamins were added after autoclaving, and the preparation of vitamin and trace element solutions followed the instructions in Wang et al. [31]. A glycerol stock of strain CPB6 stored at −80 ℃ was fully thawed and transferred to the CM medium for incubation at 37 ℃ for 48 h. The strain underwent three subcultures before being used for subsequent experiments.
Experimental Design
A 100 mL anaerobic flask with 50 mL of CM medium was supplemented with different concentrations of FeSO4·7H2O or MgSO4·7H2O to investigate their effects on the growth and metabolism of strain CPB6. The Fe2+ concentrations tested were 0, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mg/L, respectively. The Mg2+ concentrations tested were 0, 100, 200, 300, 500, 700, and 900 mg/L, respectively. Strain CPB6 was incubated at 37 ℃ for 24 h as seed inoculum (OD 600 nm = 0.8 ~ 1.0) for batch experiments. An inoculum concentration of 10% was used for each assay, and the gas produced was collected by draining (Fig. 1 illustrates the experimental setup).
Analysis Methods
The concentrations of volatile fatty acids, ethanol, and glucose in the culture broth were measured by an HPLC system (Agilent 1260 Infinity, USA) equipped with a differential refraction detector (RID) and a Hi-Plex H column (300 × 6.5 mm). The chromatographic column was operated with a mobile phase of 5 mM H2SO4 at 55 ℃. The fermentation broth was first centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 2 min, and the supernatant was subsequently filtrated through a 0.22 μm filter (Millipore Corp, Bedford, MA) before HPLC analysis. Gas components analysis was performed using a gas chromatograph (Agilent 7890B, USA). A gas sample of 3 ~ 5 mL was taken with a syringe and manually injected into the gas chromatograph for analysis. The dry weight of the bacteria (biomass) was determined by drying the precipitate obtained from 1 mL of bacterial liquid culture to a constant weight in an oven (24 h at 80 ℃). The pH of the bacterial culture was measured using a pH meter (Mettler-Toledo Instruments Ltd.).
RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis
The total RNA was extracted from bacterial cultures by the UNIQ-10 Columnar Trizol Total RNA Extraction Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality of the RNA samples was assessed through 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. Reverse transcription was performed by using 1.5 µg of the total RNA. In the ice bath, the following reagents were added to the nuclease-free PCR tube: 1 µL of dNTP Mix (final concentration of 0.5 mM), 1 µL of Random Primer p(dN)6 (100 pmol), and 14.5 µL of DEPC water. The mixture was mixed and centrifuged for 3 ~ 5 s.
The reaction mixture was then incubated for 5 min at 65 ℃ in a warm bath, followed by 2 min at 0 ℃ in an ice bath, and finally centrifuged for 3 ~ 5 s. After submerging the tubes in an ice bath, the following reagents were added: 1 µL of Maxima Reverse Transcriptase (200 U), 0.5 µL of Thermo Scientific RiboLock RNase Inhibitor (20 U), and 4 µL of 5x RT buffer. The reagents were thoroughly mixed and centrifuged for 3 ~ 5 s. Reverse transcription was performed using a PCR machine, with incubation periods of 10 min at 25 ℃, 30 min at 50 ℃, and 5 min at 85 ℃. The resulting solution was stored at −20 ℃.
Reverse Transcription-Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
Gene expression was quantified using SYBR Green I real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR. Primers targeting the functional and reference genes were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 software. The primer sequences are shown in Table 1. The fluorescent PCR device used was a LightCycler 480 II device (Roche, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). A 10 µL reaction system was employed, consisting of 5 µL of 2x SybrGreen qPCR master mix, 0.2 µL each of the 10 M upstream and downstream primers, 3.6 µL of ddH20, and 1 µL of the template (cDNA). The amplification conditions were as follows: 3 min at 95 ℃ for pre-denaturation, 45 cycles of 15 s at 95 ℃ (denaturation), and 30 s at 60 ℃ (annealing/extension).
The transcription level of key genes including thl, bcd, cat, and hydE was determined according to the 2−(ΔΔCt) method, with the recA as a reference gene for the normalization of gene expression levels, where ΔΔCt = ΔCt(Cttarget−CtrecA)treat − ΔCt (Cttarget−CtrecA)control [32, 33]. In this experiment, the control group did not receive any metal ions.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis of the results was conducted using SPSS software (version 26, IBM), with independent samples t-test for comparisons between two groups and ANOVA test for comparative analysis between multiple groups. Pearson correlation between CA or H2 production and biomass or gene expression was analyzed and visualized using GraphPad Prism software (version 8). A positive correlation is indicated when the correlation coefficient is greater than 0, whereas a negative correlation is indicated when the coefficient is less than 0. The magnitude of the absolute value of the correlation coefficient represents the strength of the correlation. A P-value greater than 0.05 indicates a lack of statistical significance, while a P-value less than 0.05 suggests statistical significance.
Results
Effect of Fe2+ on the Growth and Metabolism of Strain CPB6
As shown in Fig. 2a, the biomass of strain CPB6 initially increased and then decreased with increasing Fe2+ concentration. At a concentration of 200 mg/L Fe2+, the cell biomass reached the maximum of 1.43 g/L, significantly higher than the control without Fe2+ (P < 0.05). The pH exhibited a decline as Fe2+ concentration increased. Similarly, H2 yield showed an initial increase followed by a decrease with increasing Fe2+ concentration, peaking at 1.88 ml H2/mL medium at a concentration of 200 mg/L Fe2+, significantly higher than the control group without Fe2+ (P < 0.05, Fig. 2b). The trend in H2 production was consistent with cell biomass. However, the addition of Fe2+ had little effect on CA yield (Fig. 2b).
Effect of Mg2+ on the Growth and Metabolism of CPB6
According to Fig. 3a, the addition of Mg2+ exerted a noteworthy and positive influence on the enhancement of cellular proliferation. The biomass of the cells supplemented with Mg2+ was consistently higher than the control without Mg2+ (P<0.05). At a concentration of 300 mg/L Mg2+, the cell biomass reached a maximum of 1.53 g/L. However, it was observed that the pH tended to drop as the Mg2+ concentration increased, especially when the Mg2+ concentration exceeded 200 mg/L. The trend in CA and H2 production followed a similar pattern as the cell biomass. The maximum yields of CA and H2 were 6446.04 mg/L and 1.31 mL/mL medium, respectively, at a concentration of 300 mg/L Mg2+ (Fig. 3b). Mg2+ effectively increased cell biomass and H2 production within a range of concentrations (200 to 700 mg/L), as well as promoting CA production. These results demonstrate that the addition of Mg2+ significantly enhanced the growth of the CPB6 bacterium, contributing the higher CA and H2 production.
Effects of Fe2+ and Mg2+ on the Expression of Key Genes
The addition of Fe2+ led to a significant upregulation of the hydE gene, increasing its expression by 1 to 3.5 times compared to the control. The maximum gene expression was observed at a concentration of 200 mg/L Fe2+ (Fig. 4a). Conversely, Fe2+ had negligible effects on the expression of the bcd and cat genes. However, it exhibited a partial inhibitory effect on thl expression. In contrast, Mg2+ had minimal impact on the expression of hydE and bcd genes but strongly suppressed the expression of cat and thl genes (Fig. 4b). These findings indicate distinct effects of Fe2+ and Mg2+ on the expression of genes involved in CA and H2 production.
Correlation Between Metabolites and Gene Expression and Biomass
H2 production exhibited a strong positive correlation with the hydE expression (r = 0.56, p < 0.05, Fig. 5a) and cell biomass (r = 0.64, p < 0.05, Fig. 5b) in the presence of Fe2+. However, when Mg2+ was added, H2 production only positively correlated with cell biomass (r = 0.67, p < 0.05, Fig. 5e). CA production showed a weak negative correlation with cell biomass (r = −0.38, p > 0.05, Fig. 5c) when Fe2+ was added, but a significant positive correlation with cell biomass (r = 0.46, p < 0.05, Fig. 5f) when Mg2+ was added. These results suggest that Fe2+ primarily increased H2 production by enhancing the activity of hydrogenase and promoting cell growth. In contrast, Mg2+ increased both H2 and CA production by stimulating cell growth. However, the mechanism underlying the negative correlation between CA production and carbon chain elongation genes under the influence of Fe2+ and Mg2+ requires further investigation.
Discussion
Iron plays a crucial role in microbial growth and metabolism. Previous study has demonstrated that Fe2+ significantly enhances hydrogenase activity, H2 yield, and butyric acid synthesis in a membrane bioreactor [34]. Additionally, Fe2+ has been found to increase photosynthetic bacterial activity, biomass, and ATP generation by regulating the activities of succinate and NADH dehydrogenase [35]. Similar results have been observed in E. harbinense [28]. In this study, we observed that the addition of Fe2+ promoted cell growth, H2 production, and hydrogenase gene expression, which is consistent with previous findings. Hydrogenases are important enzymes that catalyze the reduction of protons to produce hydrogen, and their activity relies on iron as an essential cofactor. Hydrogenases can be categorized as [NiFe]-, [FeFe]-, and [Fe]- hydrogenases depending on the kind of metal ion in the catalytic site [36]. These enzymes are Fe-dependent, with iron serving as a crucial cofactor for their catalytic activity. Iron is involved in the catalytic process of hydrogen oxidation or production in hydrogenases [37]. The hydrogenase in the strain CPB6 belongs to [FeFe]-hydrogenases group, which contains a unique iron-sulfur cluster responsible for catalytic activity [38, 39]. Fe2+ is likely to enhance H2 production in strain CPB6 by increasing hydrogenase activity and influencing the catalytic process of hydrogen oxidation or production [40]. However, the addition of Fe2+ did not improve CA production, potentially attributed to the downregulation of thl gene. This gene is responsible for catalyzing the condensation of two acetyl-CoA molecules into acetoacetyl-CoA, which serves as the initial enzymatic step in CA biosynthesis [41].
Mg2+ is an activator for various kinases and synthases, as elucidated by previous studies [42]. Many kinases and cofactors of synthetic enzymes involved in the glycolytic process, such as hexokinase, phosphofructokinase, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [40]. Consequently, Mg2+ plays a role in the glycolytic process by promoting the generation of pyruvate and NADH, ultimately leading to H2 production through subsequent oxidation. Mg2+ is also involved in cellular processes such as cell wall and membrane composition [43] and regulation of ion channels [44]. The study by Hakobyan et al. illuminates the potential of Mg2+ to enhance hydrogen production in Rhodobacter sphaeroides, attributing this enhancement to the role of Mg2+ in improving cell growth and electron transfer [27]. Similarly, Zhao et al. demonstrate that the addition of 100 mg/L Mg2+ stimulates biohydrogen production and cell growth in Clostridium beijerinckii, albeit with a negative impact on the expression of the hydrogenase gene [45]. In our study, we observed a significant suppression of thl and cat expression in response to Mg2+. However, the expression of hydE and bcd in strain CPB6 remained unaffected by the presence of Mg2+. Notably, we have also observed a significant increase in both CA and H2 production at Mg2+ concentrations of 300 mg/L. Although both Fe2+ and Mg2+caused downregulation in the expression of thl, cat, and bcd genes involved in CA biosynthesis, the culture of CPB6 did not experience a decline in CA production. This can likely be attributed to the compensatory effect of increased cell biomass, which counterbalances the adverse effects of gene downregulation.
Conclusion
Previous studies have demonstrated the positive impact of metal ions on H2 production and biomass in hydrogen-producing bacteria. However, this study reveals distinct effects of Fe2+ and Mg2+ on the production of CA and H2 in the strain CPB6. Notably, Fe2+ and Mg2+ exert a greater influence on H2 production compared to CA production. These findings suggest that Fe2+ and Mg2+ may operate through different pathways to influence H2 and CA generation in strain CPB6. The careful optimization of Mg2+ and Fe2+ combination holds promise for achieving an optimal balance between cell growth and gene expression, thereby enhancing the production of both CA and H2 by strain CPB6. However, further investigation is necessary to elucidate the co-regulatory effects of Mg2+ and Fe2+ on strain CPB6 and determine their optimal addition ratios.
Data Availability
The data and materials presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
References
Zhu, X., Huang, H., He, Y., Wang, X., Jia, J., Feng, X., Li, D., & Li, H. (2022). A preliminary study on the feasibility of industrialization for n-caproic acid recovery from food wastewater: From lab to pilot. Bioresource Technology, 366, 128154.
Steinbusch, K. J. J., Hamelers, H. V. M., Plugge, C. M., & Buisman, C. J. N. (2011). Biological formation of caproate and caprylate from acetate: Fuel and chemical production from low grade biomass. Energy & Environmental Science, 4, 216–224.
Kim, B. C., Moon, C., Jeon, B. S., Angenent, L. T., Choi, Y., & Nam, K. (2021). Shaping a reactor microbiome generating stable n-caproate productivity through Design-Build-Test-Learn approach. Chemical Engineering Journal, 425.
Huang, C. B., Alimova, Y., Myers, T. M., & Ebersole, J. L. (2011). Short- and medium-chain fatty acids exhibit antimicrobial activity for oral microorganisms. Archives of Oral Biology, 56, 650–654.
Van Immerseel, F., De Buck, J., Boyen, F., Bohez, L., Pasmans, F., Volf, J., Sevcik, M., Rychlik, I., Haesebrouck, F., & Ducatelle, R. (2004). Medium-chain fatty acids decrease colonization and invasion through hilA suppression shortly after infection of chickens with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70, 3582–3587.
Tao, Y., Zhu, X., Wang, H., Wang, Y., Li, X., Jin, H., & Rui, J. (2017). Complete genome sequence of Ruminococcaceae bacterium CPB6: A newly isolated culture for efficient n-caproic acid production from lactate. Journal of Biotechnology, 259, 91–94.
Rossi, R., Pastorelli, G., Cannata, S., & Corino, C. (2010). Recent advances in the use of fatty acids as supplements in pig diets: A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 162, 1–11.
Feng, S., Xu, X., Tao, S., Chen, T., Zhou, L., Huang, Y., Yang, H., Yuan, M., & Ding, C. (2022). Comprehensive evaluation of chemical composition and health-promoting effects with chemometrics analysis of plant derived edible oils. Food Chemistry: X, 14, 100341.
Liu, P., & Jarboe, L. R. (2012). Metabolic engineering of biocatalysts for carboxylic acids production. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 3, e201210011.
Cavalcante, W. A., Leitão, R. C., Gehring, T. A., Angenent, L. T., & Santaella, S. T. (2017). Process Biochemistry, 54, 106–119.
Weimer, P. J., Nerdahl, M., & Brandl, D. J. (2015). Production of medium-chain volatile fatty acids by mixed ruminal microorganisms is enhanced by ethanol in co-culture with Clostridium kluyveri. Bioresource Technology, 175, 97–101.
Nzeteu, C., Coelho, F., Trego, A. C., Abram, F., Ramiro-Garcia, J., Paulo, L., & O’Flaherty, V. (2022). Development of an enhanced chain elongation process for caproic acid production from waste-derived lactic acid and butyric acid. Journal of Cleaner Production, 338, 130655.
Dong, W., Yang, Y., Liu, C., Zhang, J., Pan, J., Luo, L., Wu, G., Awasthi, M. K., & Yan, B. (2023). Caproic acid production from anaerobic fermentation of organic waste - Pathways and microbial perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 175, 113181.
Hawkes, F. R., Dinsdale, R., Hawkes, D. L., & Hussy, I. (2002). Sustainable fermentative hydrogen production: challenges for process optimisation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 27, 1339–1347.
Kapdan, I. K., & Kargi, F. (2006). Bio-hydrogen production from waste materials. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 38, 569–582.
Xia, A., Cheng, J., Song, W., Su, H., Ding, L., Lin, R., Lu, H., Liu, J., Zhou, J., & Cen, K. (2015). Fermentative hydrogen production using algal biomass as feedstock. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51, 209–230.
Holladay, J. D., Hu, J., King, D. L., & Wang, Y. (2009). An overview of hydrogen production technologies. Catalysis Today, 139, 244–260.
Liao, Q., Wang, Y. J., Wang, Y. Z., Zhu, X., Tian, X., & Li, J. (2010). Formation and hydrogen production of photosynthetic bacterial biofilm under various illumination conditions. Bioresource Technology, 101, 5315–5324.
Cheng, H. H., Whang, L. M., Lin, C. A., Liu, I. C., & Wu, C. W. (2013). Metabolic flux network analysis of fermentative hydrogen production: Using Clostridium tyrobutyricum as an example. Bioresource Technology, 141, 233–239.
Wang, J., & Wan, W. (2009). Factors influencing fermentative hydrogen production: A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34, 799–811.
Gray, C. T., & Gest, H. (1965). Biological formation of molecular hydrogen Science (New York, N.Y.), 148, 186–192.
Zhao, N., Liang, D., Liu, H., Meng, S., & Li, X. (2023). Efficient H2 production in a novel separator electrode assembly (SEA) microbial electrolysis cell. Chemical Engineering Journal, 451.
Chen, Y., Chen, M., Shen, N., & Zeng, R. J. (2016). H2 production by the thermoelectric microconverter coupled with microbial electrolysis cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41, 22760–22768.
Benemann, J. (1996). Hydrogen biotechnology: progress and prospects. Nature Biotechnology, 14, 1101–1103.
Litti, Y. V., Potekhina, M. A., Zhuravleva, E. A., Vishnyakova, A. V., Gruzdev, D. S., Kovalev, A. A., Kovalev, D. A., Katraeva, I. V., & Parshina, S. N. (2022). Dark fermentative hydrogen production from simple sugars and various wastewaters by a newly isolated Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum SP-H2. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47, 24310–24327.
Gomez-Romero, J., Gonzalez-Garcia, A., Chairez, I., Torres, L., & García-Peña, E. I. (2014). Selective adaptation of an anaerobic microbial community: Biohydrogen production by co-digestion of cheese whey and vegetables fruit waste. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39, 12541–12550.
Hakobyan, L., Gabrielyan, L., & Trchounian, A. (2012). Ni (II) and Mg (II) ions as factors enhancing biohydrogen production by Rhodobacter sphaeroides from mineral springs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37, 7482–7486.
Zhao, X., Xing, D., Qi, N., Zhao, Y., Hu, X., & Ren, N. (2017). Deeply mechanism analysis of hydrogen production enhancement of Ethanoligenens harbinense by Fe2+ and Mg2+: Monitoring at growth and transcription levels. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42, 19695–19700.
Lin, C. Y., & Shei, S. H. (2008). Heavy metal effects on fermentative hydrogen production using natural mixed microflora. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33, 587–593.
Karadag, D., & Puhakka, J. A. (2010). Enhancement of anaerobic hydrogen production by iron and nickel. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35, 8554–8560.
Wang, H., Li, X., Wang, Y., Tao, Y., Lu, S., Zhu, X., & Li, D. (2018). Improvement of n-caproic acid production with Ruminococcaceae bacterium CPB6: selection of electron acceptors and carbon sources and optimization of the culture medium. Microbial Cell Factories, 17.
Hamalainen, H. K., Tubman, J. C., Vikman, S., Kyrölä, T., Ylikoski, E., Warrington, J. A., & Lahesmaa, R. (2001). Identification and validation of endogenous reference genes for expression profiling of T helper cell differentiation by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Analytical Biochemistry, 299, 63–70.
Kumar, A., & Lorand, D. (2021). Robust ΔΔct estimate. Genomics, 113, 420–427.
Lee, D. Y., Li, Y. Y., Oh, Y. K., Kim, M. S., & Noike, T. (2009). Effect of iron concentration on continuous H2 production using membrane bioreactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34, 1244–1252.
Wu, P., & Xu, X. (2022). Fe2+ enhancing biomass production and soybean wastewater treatment of photosynthetic bacteria through regulation of aerobic respiration. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 28.
Shima, S., & Thauer, R. K. (2007). A third type of hydrogenase catalyzing H2 activation.Chemical record (New York, N.Y.), 7, 37–46.
Vignais, P. M., & Billoud, B. (2007). Occurrence, classification, and biological function of hydrogenases: An overview. Chemical Reviews, 107, 4206–4272.
Lu, S., Jin, H., Wang, Y., & Tao, Y. (2021). Genome-Wide Transcriptomic Analysis of n-Caproic Acid Production in Ruminococcaceae Bacterium CPB6 with Lactate Supplementation. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 31, 1533–1544.
Wittkamp, F., Senger, M., Stripp, S. T., & Apfel, U. P. (2018). [FeFe]-Hydrogenases: recent developments and future perspectives. Chemical communications (Cambridge, England), 54, 5934–5942.
Bao, M. D., Su, H. J., & Tan, T. W. (2013). Dark fermentative bio-hydrogen production: Effects of substrate pre-treatment and addition of metal ions or L-cysteine. Fuel, 112, 38–44.
Seedorf, H., Fricke, W. F., Veith, B., Brüggemann, H., Liesegang, H., Strittmatter, A., Miethke, M., Buckel, W., Hinderberger, J., Li, F., Hagemeier, C., Thauer, R. K., & Gottschalk, G. (2008). The genome of Clostridium kluyveri, a strict anaerobe with unique metabolic features. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 2128–2133.
Jin, F., Huang, Y., & Hattori, M. (2022). Recent Advances in the Structural Biology of Mg2+ Channels and Transporters. Journal of Molecular Biology, 434, 167729.
Wang, X. J., Ren, N. Q., Xiang, W. S., & Guo, W. Q. (2007). Influence of gaseous end-products inhibition and nutrient limitations on the growth and hydrogen production by hydrogen-producing fermentative bacterial B49. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32, 748–754.
Alexander, R. T., Hoenderop, J. G., & Bindels, R. J. (2008). Molecular determinants of magnesium homeostasis: Insights from human disease.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 19, 1451–1458.
Zhao, X., Xing, D., Liu, B., Lu, L., Zhao, J., & Ren, N. (2012).The effects of metal ions and l-cysteine on hydA gene expression and hydrogen production by Clostridium beijerinckii RZF-1108.International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37, 13711–13717.
Funding
This work was supported by the Sichuan Science and Technology Support Program (2021YJ0022), the Sichuan Scientific and Technological Achievements Transfer and Transformation Project (2021ZHCG0033), and Liquor Marking Bioligical Technology and Application of Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province (NJ2023-01★).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Guihong Xie: writing—original draft preparation; Duo Huang and Xuemei Duan: partial data collection; Jun Liu and Siqi Yuan: data analysis and review; Yong Tao: conceiving, designing, review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
This manuscript is a microbial fermentation study, not designed for human or animal experimentation, and therefore does not require ethical approval. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Consent to Participate
Human subjects were not designed for this study.
Consent for Publication
This manuscript does not contain human study data.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, G., Huang, D., Duan, X. et al. Mechanisms for the Enhancement of Caproic Acid and H2 Production in Ruminococcaceae Bacterium CPB6 by Fe(II) and Mg(II): Growth and Gene Transcription Analyses. Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-024-04920-8
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-024-04920-8