Abstract
Purpose of Review
Heart failure results in the high incidence and mortality all over the world. Mechanical properties of myocardium are critical determinants of cardiac function, with regional variations in myocardial contractility demonstrated within infarcted ventricles. Quantitative assessment of cardiac contractile function is therefore critical to identify myocardial infarction for the early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention.
Recent Findings
Current advancement of cardiac functional assessments is in pace with the development of imaging techniques. The methods tailored to advanced imaging have been widely used in cardiac magnetic resonance, echocardiography, and optical microscopy. In this review, we introduce fundamental concepts and applications of representative methods for each imaging modality used in both fundamental research and clinical investigations. All these methods have been designed or developed to quantify time-dependent 2-dimensional (2D) or 3D cardiac mechanics, holding great potential to unravel global or regional myocardial deformation and contractile function from end-systole to end-diastole.
Summary
Computational methods to assess cardiac contractile function provide a quantitative insight into the analysis of myocardial mechanics during cardiac development, injury, and remodeling.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Heart failure leads to alarmingly high levels of morbidity and mortality worldwide and is considered the global health priority [1,2,3]. Over 26 million patients suffer from heart failure worldwide [4, 5], with an addition of nearly 550,000 cases per year in the USA [5, 6]. Myocardial infarction remains the most common cause of heart failure, resulting in impaired myocardial structure and contractile dysfunction [6]. Despite continued efforts to uncover the underlying mechanism of cardiac injury, numerous issues in cardiac structure and function are yet to be investigated. Myocardial mechanical properties are critical determinants of cardiac function, playing a vital role in understanding the heart formation, development, injury, and remodeling. For this reason, improved understanding of myocardial mechanics enables to provide a biomechanical blueprint for cardiac contractile function and facilitate new strategies for restoring function to the injured heart.
Non-invasive imaging technique is an indispensable tool to investigate the 4-dimensional (4D, 3D spatial + 1D temporal) cardiac dynamics over the course of time, allowing us to assess in vivo cardiac architecture and contractility with regards to myocardial dysfunction. With numerous imaging methods implemented, two metrics are widely used to assess the cardiac contractile function: ejection fraction as a global index, and strain or strain rate as a regional measure [7, 8]. Generally, ejection fraction indicates the percentage of blood flow leaving from the ventricle with each heartbeat [9, 10•], providing a global value of ventricular volume change. In contrast, strain and strain rate mostly focus on time-dependent 2D local myocardial deformation, advantageous for early identification of cardiac dysfunction [10•, 11]. Both ejection fraction and strain are dimensionless quantities reflecting the contractile change of myocardial deformation, while strain rate indicates the rate of this change and represents instantaneous force–velocity-length relations that can be used to define the local contractile state [12, 13].
Myocardial contraction and relaxation can be decomposed into three directions in Euclidean coordinates, that is, longitudinal, circumferential, and radial directions, respectively [10•, 14] (Fig. 1). In this context, strain analysis demonstrates base-apex shortening, transmural thickening, and circumferential stretching [14]. The ability to analyze myocardial deformation in a specific region of interest (ROI) enables us to quantify local cardiac contractility, providing an entry point to interrogate the myocardial contraction and relaxation in response to functional abnormalities within multiple cardiac cycles.
While computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) are increasingly important in evaluation of cardiac contractility [15, 16], we focus on other widely used methods tailored to contractile analysis. In this review, we summarize the representative methods along with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), echocardiography, and optical microscopy to assess myocardial contractility for both fundamental research and clinical investigations. These methods include but not limit to CMR tagging, tissue doppler imaging (TDI), speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE), and displacement analysis of myocardial mechanical deformation (DIAMOND) in light-sheet fluorescence microscopy.
Myocardial Analysis Based on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is one of the primary imaging modalities used to assess myocardial deformation and displacement in both fundamental research and clinical settings. The representative approaches of cardiac analysis include spatial modulation of magnetization (SPAMM), strain encoded magnetic resonance (SENC), displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE), harmonic phase (HARP), and sine-wave modeling (SinMod).
Tagging is a method to create non-invasive markers in CMR images by implementing a selective radiofrequency (RF) pulse sequence to spatially perturb the longitudinal magnetization prior to the acquisition [17,18,19]. The alternating bright and dark patterns on the image produced by varying RF pulses are tag lines, and will be deformed when the myocardium contracts and relaxes (Fig. 2A) [7, 19]. At the beginning of the cardiac cycle, tag lines in images are parallel and equispaced. In the frequency domain, corresponding spectral peaks are represented as harmonic frequencies, becoming wider following the tissue contraction. Unlike invasive methods such as implanted radiopaque markers and ultrasound crystals, CMR tagging is non-invasive and highly reproducible to quantify the regional myocardial deformation, allowing us to track myocardial motion in response to cardiac dysfunction at high spatial resolution [19,20,21].
One of representative techniques developed to acquire tagged CMR images is spatial modulation of magnetization. It was developed to generate sinusoidal tag patterns and create a 2D grid of sharp intrinsic myocardial markers [22]. However, tagging lines fade toward the end of the cardiac cycle, leading to an unrecognizable tagging pattern. For this reason, complementary SPAMM (CSPAMM) was developed to persist longer net tagging lines while suppressing untagged blood [23].
Another technique to assess cardiac contractility is DENSE [9]. It encodes the displacement of the tissue into the phase of the magnetization vector. DENSE uses stimulated echo acquisition mode pulse sequence to extract cardiac motion at high spatial density over segments of an entire cardiac cycle [24]. A stimulated echo with a bipolar gradient is introduced to encode myocardial displacement. The phase of the MR signal is modulated and demodulated using the stimulated echo pulse by the gradients being applied between the first two RF pulses and the one after the third RF pulse. The displacements occurring during the mixing time, the time duration between the second and third RF pulses, are recorded in the phase of a stimulated echo image, indicating the phase of DENSE images is proportional to the myocardial displacement (Table 1) [7, 19]. While the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the DENSE method is attributed to the 50% signal loss inherent to stimulated echoes, it has been improved by a single-averaged DENSE technique in combination with an uncorrelated noise from CSPAMM image during image reconstruction [7, 25]. In addition, Cine DENSE imaging sequence that trade SNR for temporal resolution is designed to track elements of myocardium through time as they move through the cardiac cycle [26].
Similar to SPAMM and DENSE, SENC is also based on applying parallel planes of saturated magnetization that are used as virtual markers to track cardiac motion. However, in contrast to conventional tagging where the saturated magnetization planes are applied perpendicular to the imaging plane and thus appear as dark stripes in the imaged slice, SENC applies the tagging planes parallel to (and therefore lie inside) the imaged slice, similar to pages of a book (Fig. 2B). Through-plane motion results in varying stripes during the contraction or relaxation, leading to the higher or lower tagging frequency. Therefore, SENC has the capability to directly encode the regional strain into the acquired image without measuring the displacement. Longitudinal and circumferential strains are respectively measured from short-axis and long-axis images. The integration of DENSE and SENC was also developed to obtain a 3D strain map in a single layer of the myocardium at the high spatial resolution [7, 27].
Following the tagged images, motion estimation strategies based on the image intensity, and the k-space were developed to track myocardial contraction and relaxation. One way to track the deformed tagging is tracing the varying intensity and brightness by using active contour models [28,29,30], optical flow techniques [31,32,33], finite element modeling [34, 35], and volumetric modeling [36,37,38] to reflect myocardial contraction. The other way is analyzing the k-space frequency for the identification and extraction of the harmonic spectral peaks, including Harmonic-Phase (HARP) [39,40,41] and sinusoidal-modeling (SinMod) analysis [42,43,44]. We focus on the latter methods for its faster and more automatic analysis of myocardial motion [19].
HARP implements SPAMM tags to produce a sequence of spectral peaks in the k-space to extract myocardial contraction and relaxation [39,40,41]. Each spectral peak carries a specific frequency extracted by phase demodulation methods to reflect the cardiac contractile function. The underlying principle of HARP is to extract the signal peak at the first harmonic frequency, consisting of the tagging information. Harmonic magnitude and phase images are then multiplied to generate a HARP image in the frequency domain. To analyze HARP image, we need to consider its two properties. One is that the phase relates to the material property, that is, the harmonic phase of a specific spot is time invariant. Another property is that the slope of the harmonic phase is linearly related to the compression and elongation of the heart muscle, i.e., myocardial strain. Benefiting from the simplicity and performance, HARP is one of the most common approaches.
The SinMod technique is a frequency-based method to extract myocardial motion from the tagged images based on sinusoidal approximation. In SinMod, the intensity distribution is modeled as a summation of sinusoidal wavefronts, depicting the motion of the myocardium. The environment of each pixel in the image is characterized as a sine wave with local frequency and amplitude. Without utilizing phase data from surrounding pixels, a displacement estimation is provided by the local quotient of the phase difference and the mean frequency at each pixel of two consecutive images. In addition, an objective criterion is constructed for each pixel to reflect the local quality of the sinusoidal model as a descriptor of the available image data [42]. Despite the acceptable agreement of the strain and torsion patterns by HARP and SinMod, the latter could reduce the phase aliasing and sensitivity to noise at the cost of systematical overestimation of measurements compared to HARP [45].
Evaluating Myocardial Deformation Using Echocardiography
While CMR imaging plays an indispensable role in the assessment of cardiac contraction and relaxation, the low temporal resolution remains a bottleneck in CMR image formation and subsequent analysis. In contrast, echocardiography addresses this issue and allows for the rapid acquisition of multiple cardiac phases within one cardiac cycle. Among them, tissue doppler imaging (TDI) and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) are representative methods. We have summarized the development of the aforementioned methods in Fig. 3.
TDI is introduced to measure the Doppler effect of ultrasound signals reflected from the contracting myocardium. This method allows us to assess cardiac contractility during multiple cycles in both fundamental research and clinical investigations [46, 47]. The fundamental imaging mechanism of TDI determines higher amplitude and lower frequency signals generated by myocardial contraction in comparison to those from blood blow. In this context, both pulsed-wave TDI (PW-TDI) and color-coded TDI (C-TDI) are widely used [48].
PW-TDI is based on spectral analysis of the reflected ultrasound signals, providing information about the range of myocardial velocities encountered at the investigated region. It is used to measure peak myocardial velocities and is particularly well suited to the measurement of long-axis ventricular motion as the longitudinally oriented endocardial fibers are most parallel to the ultrasound beam in the apical views. PW-TDI offers a high level of temporal resolution (3 ~ 4 ms) [49] and can therefore be used to analyze the temporal relationship between myocardium systolic and diastolic velocity waves. However, PW-TDI is limited to imaging a single myocardial segment at a time.
Similar to PW-TDI, C-TDI also utilizes intermittent sampling of ultrasound, but it allows the visualization of different cardiac segments from a single view. C-TDI calculates multipoint color-coded blood flow velocities along a succession of ultrasonic scan lines inside a 2D sector using an autocorrelation algorithm, and generate superimposed color-coded blood flow velocity images, similar to color flow Doppler [50, 51]. Because C-TDI measures mean values rather than peak systolic and diastolic velocities, myocardial velocities obtained using C-DTI are generally 20% lower in systole and diastole compared to PW-TDI. The ability of C-TDI to collect full sector image data of various ventricle segments significantly reduces the scanning time in comparison with PW-TDI, resulting in the combination of high temporal resolution with a high spatial resolution. However, C-TDI results highly depends on the image quality, leading to the poor reproducibility [52, 53].
While TDI enables us to characterize 2D myocardial displacement, strain, and strain rate throughout the cardiac cycle, this kind of methods only uncovers the myocardial deformation along the direction of ultrasound waves (Fig. 4A). Thus, the angle dependency limits its application of 3D contractile analysis [54]. In addition, due to Doppler effect, TDI is highly susceptible to noise arising from the blood pool, aliasing, and reverberation [55].
To address the issue of Doppler effect in TDI, STE is developed to offer an alternative approach to measure myocardial strain and strain rate. STE is a quantitative echocardiography used for evaluating myocardial deformation through analysis of the motion of speckles [56, 57]. In an ultrasonic 2D image, speckles are generated at random due to reflections, refraction, and scattering of ultrasound beams with myocardial fibers [54]. Speckle tracking provides non-Doppler, angle-independent, and objective quantification of myocardial deformation and ventricular systolic and diastolic dynamics. The idea of STE is to track the displacement of the speckles during the cardiac cycle, and therefore the regional myocardial deformation can be assessed using strain and the strain rate. Different from TDI, STE is angle independent of the ultrasound beam and tracks the displacements in 2D (Fig. 4B) [58].
Several methods such as block matching [59], optical flow [60], feature tracking [61], level sets [62], and elastic registration [63] are used for assessing the shift of speckles in 2D ultrasound images. The two commonly used methods for speckle tracking are block matching and optical flow. The idea of block matching is to select a region in one frame, matching it with the patterns in adjacent positions in the subsequent frames based on similarity comparison. In contrast, the assumption of optical flow is that the gray value variation in a particular pixel can only be attributed to location movement, thus it tracks the frame-by-frame displacement of the spots with a specific grayscale. For this reason, regional myocardial motion can be extracted from the geometric displacement of speckles [58], and the velocity is calculated from the displacement of each speckle divided by the time between successive frames. Similarly, strain and strain rate can be determined by the relative shift of speckles at a given time range in the ROI.
Optical Imaging and Analyzation of Cardiac Functions
While CMR and echocardiography are established to extract anatomical architecture and cardiac contractile function, parallel advances in optical imaging along with computational methods lead to better spatiotemporal resolution, higher image contrast, and specific fluorescence labeling in fundamental research. The usage of optical imaging methods on animal models provides an entry point to investigate cardiac structure and contractility at molecular and cellular scales, enabling to unravel the underlying mechanism of cardiac development, injury, and regeneration [64]. Besides non-invasive visualization and analysis, researchers also used the pulsed laser illumination on graphene-treated zebrafish to manipulate the heart contraction and assess the output [65, 66].
Light-sheet microscopy (LSM) [67, 68], and light-field microscopy (LFM) [69] are emerging methods to capture 4D biomechanical and biophysical dynamics. The basic principle of LSM is to decouple the laser illumination and fluorescence detection, generating orthogonal illumination and detection to enable optical sectioning in a sample (Fig. 5A). The laser is reshaped as a virtual blade to excite the sample placed at the intersection of the illumination and the detection axes, and the emitted fluorescence is collected by the detection optics and array sensors. LSM provides high spatial and temporal resolution, high SNR and minimal photobleaching, otherwise challenging with the existing microscopes. In the meanwhile, LFM has become the technique of choice for instantaneous volumetric imaging [70,71,72,73, 74•]. It permits the acquisition of transient 3D signals via postprocessing of the light-field information recorded by single 2D camera snapshots. Due to the high spatiotemporal resolution, these new methods advanced our knowledge of regional variations in myocardial contractility, allowing us to investigate the heterogeneity of injury response across the entire heart [75, 76].
The custom-built light-sheet microscope is able to capture the 4D contraction and relaxation within multiple cardiac cycles in the zebrafish embryo from 3 days post fertilization (dpf) to 7 dpf, providing the basis to interrogate the 4D local myocardial displacement and strain. The first method tailored to light-sheet microscopy is displacement analysis of myocardial mechanical deformation (DIAMOND) [77•]. This semi-automated method allows us to track the regional myocardial displacement from end-systole to end-diastole, and further to assess the regional susceptibility in response to chemotherapy-induced injury. Different from ejection fraction and strain analysis, DIAMOND is able to track the 3D trajectory of mass centroid of each segment of myocardium throughout the whole cardiac cycle and quantify the local displacement of each segment. The ventricle along the short axis is divided into 8 equal segments constituted by even angles according to the intersection of a virtual division line (spanning from the atrium to the ventricle with the center of the endocardial ventricular cavity (Fig. 5B). The most basal segments (VII and VIII) were removed from further analyses, given they are immediately adjacent to the atrioventricular valve and thus contain less myocardium compared with the other segments (I–VI) and thereby constitute incomplete myocardial segmental territories. DIAMOND allows us to correlate the focal cardiac mechanics with the local contractility in a live organism, establishing a framework to characterize the contribution of specific pluripotent cells to chemotherapy-induced cardiac injury and regeneration.
Recently, an integrated system including both LSM and LFM has been reported to investigate myocardial contraction and intracardiac blood flow [76]. Along with the contracting myocardium, time-dependent blood flow is also concurrently traced. This method further enhances the resolution of displacement tracing to single voxel level in comparison to the mass centroid in DIAMOND, providing higher spatial and temporal resolution to assess the structure and contractile function in a contracting heart [77•]. These two customized methods, derived from deformable image registration [78,79,80], shed the light on the assessment of myocardial function by tracking the displacement of individual cardiomyocytes. The advancement of these methods further provides the possibility to investigate excitation–contraction coupling across the whole heart at the single cell level, following the integration of optical mapping methods [81]. In this case, calcium transients and mechanical contraction are able to be concurrently captured and analyzed with high spatiotemporal resolution.
In addition, optical coherence tomography (OCT) [82,83,84] and photoacoustic tomography (PAT) [85] have been reported to study cardiac morphogenesis and myocardial infarction. In comparison to other optical methods, both OCT and PAT are able to noninvasively image deep inside the heart over millimeters at the microscale resolution [86, 87], and therefore they have been used in mouse models for the in vivo study of cardiac structure and function. OCT is an imaging modality that uses near-infrared light and low-coherence interferometry, ideal for observing fine cardiac structures. Along with the structural imaging, Doppler OCT is developed to study the localized cardiac dynamics in the mouse tubular embryonic heart. It helps to understand the relation between the volumetric blood flow and the local pressure gradient produced by heart wall movements in terms of flow resistance within the beating heart. PAT is an emerging method combining photon absorption and ultrasonic detection to maximize the imaging depth (~ 7 cm in vivo) [88]. This technique has advanced the visualization of cardiac structure at both microscopic and macroscopic levels. For example, a hemispherical PAT system was reported to non-invasively characterize the myocardial infarction [85]. Hemispherical PAT was featured as is capable of organ imaging and lesion region differentiation, enabling non-invasive diagnosis of MI and long-term monitoring. In addition to high image contrast, fine spatial resolution, and adequate tissue penetration, PAT is also able to reflect functional and metabolic changes stemming from hemodynamic information.
Although the specialized quantitative analysis of myocardial mechanics tailored to OCT or PAT remains to be defined, several tools such as PyJAMAS [89] and 3DeeCellTracker [90] have been reported for the motion tracking tailor to optical methods. PyJAMAS is an open-source Python application that combines classical segmentation methods with machine learning techniques to analyze biological images. It is available through a cross-platform graphical user interface or an application programming interface (API). By using the watershed region growing algorithm [91, 92] combined with particle image velocimetry, PyJAMAS can perform automatic cell segmentation and tracking in time or space. On the other hand, 3DeeCellTracker is developed to segment and track cells and extract their dynamic positions/activities for 4D datasets. Using deep learning techniques such as 3D U-Net and feedforward network, 3DeeCellTracker allows us to analyze various types of images captured by optical microscope systems. Specifically, it has been successfully used to track cardiomyocytes in the naturally beating heart of zebrafish embryo under the LSM [90], demonstrating the great potential for the computational analysis of cardiac contractile function.
Conclusion
Myocardial mechanical properties and regional variations in myocardial contractility are critical indicators of cardiac function [93, 94]. Accordingly, we reviewed the representative methods based on different non-invasive imaging modalities to assess myocardial deformation, contraction, and relaxation. From bench to bedside, CMR, echocardiography, and optical imaging methods equipped with the specific RF sequence or post-processing computation have been developed to assess cardiac dysfunction, facilitating diagnosis and fundamental research. We have summarized the advantages and disadvantages of numerous methods from the imaging and post-processing perspectives, providing a new insight into the computational analysis of cardiac contractile function.
CMR-based methods and echocardiography are currently widely used for clinical investigations of myocardial deformation due to their great penetration depth. Recent developments are notable for their use in cardio-oncology, which seeks to provide pre-treatment risk stratification, surveillance, diagnosis, and assessment of cardiotoxicity during chemotherapy and radiotherapy, especially in patients undergoing anthracyclines and/or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeted treatment [95, 96]. While left ventricular ejection fraction is still the most widespread biomarker used for surveillance, myocardial strain has been considered a more sensitive imaging biomarker to enable earlier diagnosis and treatment [97]. Global longitudinal strain through STE has been suggested by several guidelines for inclusion into echocardiographic surveillance for cancer therapy–related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) [97,98,99]. As the gold standard for evaluating cardiac function, CMR is also considered as a complementary tool to echocardiography for early prediction of CTRCD in clinical investigations [100, 101]. The implementation of these methods has already allowed for the in-depth analysis of anticancer therapy-induced cardiomyopathy in patients.
However, the absence of fluorescence labeling and lower spatial resolution in contrast to optical methods prevent the applications of CMR in fundamental research. Animal models such as zebrafish or mice with genetically tractable fluorescence provide in vivo evaluation of therapeutic effectiveness and cardiac function after the treatment for the investigation of CTRCD [102,103,104,105,106]. Therefore, the emerging LSM and LFM coupled with the computational ability to characterize high-resolution fluorescence-labeled 4D images are emerging for current analysis of cardiac contractile function in research laboratories [107]. However, the shallow penetration depth constrains them in only transparent organisms such as zebrafish embryos. Relatively, OCT and PAT provide better penetration for the live imaging of mouse heart. The outstanding temporal resolution of ultrasound and optical imaging techniques also makes them favorable in cardiac contractility analysis which requires fast image acquisition.
Also, computational methods assessing the cardiac contractile function are integrating with machine learning and deep learning to track myocardial cells in 4D or time-dependent 2D images, providing more possibilities for cardiac image analysis. Such methods also have the potential to be integrated into the widespread virtual reality (VR) or augmented reality (AR) platforms for interactively study of cardiac mechanics [75, 108,109,110]. Thus, it is commendable to take advantage of different imaging methods with computational tools for a comprehensive analysis of cardiac functions.
Overall, we believe the study of global and regional cardiac contractile function will significantly benefit from the advancement of imaging and computational analysis, as the transformative integration of imaging and computation holds the great potential to unravel the contribution of mechanical properties to cardiac development and regeneration.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
Mann DL. Inflammatory mediators and the failing heart. Circ Res. 2002;91(11). https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000043825.01705.1B.
Adamo L, Rocha-Resende C, Prabhu SD, Mann DL. Reappraising the role of inflammation in heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17(5). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-019-0315-x.
Jafar TH, et al. Non-communicable diseases and injuries in Pakistan: strategic priorities. The Lancet. 2013;381(9885). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60646-7.
Ponikowski P, et al. Heart failure: preventing disease and death worldwide. ESC Heart Fail. 2014;(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12005.
Bui AL, Horwich TB, Fonarow GC. Epidemiology and risk profile of heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2010.165.
Voorhees AP, Han H-C. Biomechanics of cardiac function. Compr Physiol. 2015;5(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c140070.
Wang H, Amini AA. Cardiac motion and deformation recovery from MRI: a review. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012;31(2). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2011.2171706.
Frangi AF, Niessen WJ, Viergever MA. Three-dimensional modeling for functional analysis of cardiac images, a review. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20(1). https://doi.org/10.1109/42.906421.
Konstam MA, Abboud FM. Ejection fraction: misunderstood and overrated (changing the paradigm in categorizing heart failure). Circulation 2017;135(8). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025795.
• Amzulescu MS, et al. Myocardial strain imaging: review of general principles, validation, and sources of discrepancies. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;20(6). https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jez041. This study compares specific cardiac tracking and strain imaging modalities, and it summarizes the general principles and technical innovations of current deformable image analysis.
Mirsky I, Parmley WW. Assessment of passive elastic stiffness for isolated heart muscle and the intact heart. Circ Res. 1973;33(2):233–43. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.33.2.233.
Abraham TP, Nishimura RA. Myocardial strain: can we finally measure contractility? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01173-6.
Sonnenblick EH. Instantaneous force-velocity-length determinants in the contraction of heart muscle. Circ Res. 1965;16(5). https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.16.5.441.
Scatteia A, Baritussio A, Bucciarelli-Ducci C. Strain imaging using cardiac magnetic resonance. Heart Fail Rev. 2017;22(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-017-9621-8.
Slomka P, Berman DS, Alexanderson E, Germano G. The role of PET quantification in cardiovascular imaging. Clin Transl Imaging. 2014;2(4):343–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40336-014-0070-2.
Vach M, et al. Feasibility of CT-derived myocardial strain measurement in patients with advanced cardiac valve disease. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88294-5.
O’Dell WG, McVeigh ER, Moore CC, Zerhouni EA. Implementation of displacement field fitting for calculating 3D myocardial deformations from parallel-tagged MR images. Proc 16th Ann Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 1994;1:551–552. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.1994.411908.
Axel L, Dougherty L. MR imaging of motion with spatial modulation of magnetization. Radiology 1989;171(3). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.171.3.2717762.
Ibrahim E-SH. Myocardial tagging by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: evolution of techniques–pulse sequences, analysis algorithms, and applications. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011;13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-36.
Brower RW, ten Katen HJ, Meester GT. Direct method for determining regional myocardial shortening after bypass surgery from radiopaque markers in man. Am J Cardiol. 1978;41(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(78)90879-2.
Villarreal FJ, Waldman LK, Lew WY. Technique for measuring regional two-dimensional finite strains in canine left ventricle. Circ Res.1988;62(4). https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.62.4.711.
Shehata ML, Cheng S, Osman NF, Bluemke DA, Lima JA. Myocardial tissue tagging with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009;11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-11-55.
Fischer SE, McKinnon GC, Maier SE, Boesiger P. Improved myocardial tagging contrast. Magn Reson Med. 1993;30(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910300207.
Aletras AH, Ding S, Balaban RS, Wen H. DENSE: displacement encoding with stimulated echoes in cardiac functional MRI. J Magn Reson San Diego Calif 1997. 1999;137(1). https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.1998.1676.
Kim D, Epstein FH, Gilson WD, Axel L. Increasing the signal-to-noise ratio in DENSE MRI by combining displacement-encoded echoes. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20109.
Kim D, Gilson WD, Kramer CM, Epstein FH. Myocardial tissue tracking with two-dimensional cine displacement-encoded mr imaging: development and initial evaluation. Radiology 2004;230(3). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2303021213.
Hess AT, Zhong X, Spottiswoode BS, Epstein FH, Meintjes EM. Myocardial 3D strain calculation by combining cine DENSE and cine SENC imaging. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med. 2009;62(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21984.
Guttman MA, Prince JL, McVeigh ER. Tag and contour detection in tagged MR images of the left ventricle. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994;13(1). https://doi.org/10.1109/42.276146.
Kumar S, Goldgof D. Automatic tracking of SPAMM grid and the estimation of deformation parameters from cardiac MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994;13(1). https://doi.org/10.1109/42.276150.
Ozturk C, McVeigh ER. Four-dimensional B-spline based motion analysis of tagged MR images: introduction andin vivovalidation. Phys Med Biol. 2000;45(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/45/6/319.
Dougherty L, Asmuth JC, Blom AS, Axel L, Kumar R. Validation of an optical flow method for tag displacement estimation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999;18(4). https://doi.org/10.1109/42.768845.
Florack L, van Assen H. A new methodology for multiscale myocardial deformation and strain analysis based on tagging MRI. Int J Biomed Imaging 2010:341242. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/341242.
Xu C, et al. Deformation analysis of 3D tagged cardiac images using an optical flow method. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-19.
Young AA. Model tags: direct three-dimensional tracking of heart wall motion from tagged magnetic resonance images. Med Image Anal. 1999;3(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1361-8415(99)80029-2.
Genet M, Stoeck CT, von Deuster C, Lee LC, Kozerke S. Equilibrated warping: finite element image registration with finite strain equilibrium gap regularization. Med Image Anal. 2018;50:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2018.07.007.
Deng X, Denney TS. Combined tag tracking and strain reconstruction from tagged cardiac MR images without user-defined myocardial contours. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI. 2005;21(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20234.
Park J, Metaxas D, Axel L. Volumetric deformable models with parameter functions: A new approach to the 3D motion analysis of the LV from MRI-SPAMM. Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Vision 1995:700–705. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.1995.466870.
Sermesant M, Delingette H, Ayache N. An electromechanical model of the heart for image analysis and simulation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25(5). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2006.872746.
Osman NF, Kerwin WS, McVeigh ER, Prince JL. Cardiac motion tracking using CINE harmonic phase (HARP) magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med. 1999;42(6).
Osman NF, McVeigh ER, Prince JL. Imaging heart motion using harmonic phase MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2000;19(3). https://doi.org/10.1109/42.845177.
Osman NF, Prince JL. Visualizing myocardial function using HARP MRI. Phys Med Biol. 2000;45(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/45/6/318.
Arts T, Prinzen FW, Delhaas T, Milles JR, Rossi AC, Clarysse P. Mapping displacement and deformation of the heart with local sine-wave modeling. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29(5):1114–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2009.2037955.
Wang H, Stoeck CT, Kozerke S, Amini AA. Analysis of 3D cardiac deformations with 3D SinMod. Ann Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Ann Int Conf. 2013;2013:4386–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610518.
Clarysse P, et al. Two-dimensional spatial and temporal displacement and deformation field fitting from cardiac magnetic resonance tagging. Med Image Anal. 2000;4(3):253–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1361-8415(00)00018-9.
Ibrahim E-SH, et al. Regional cardiac function analysis from tagged MRI images. Comparison of techniques: harmonic-phase (HARP) versus sinusoidal-modeling (SinMod) analysis. Magn Reson Imaging 2018;54:271–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2018.05.008.
Kadappu KK, Thomas L. Tissue Doppler imaging in echocardiography: value and limitations. Heart Lung Circ. 2015;24(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2014.10.003.
Isaaz K, Thompson A, Ethevenot G, Cloez JL, Brembilla B, Pernot C. Doppler echocardiographic measurement of low velocity motion of the left ventricular posterior wall. Am J Cardiol. 1989;64(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(89)90655-3.
Olsen NT, Jons C, Fritz-Hansen T, Mogelvang R, Sogaard P. Pulsed-wave tissue Doppler and color tissue doppler echocardiography: calibration with M-mode, agreement, and reproducibility in a clinical setting. Echocardiography. 2009;26(6):638–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.2008.00872.x.
Soliman OII, et al. Spectral pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging lateral-to-septal delay fails to predict clinical or echocardiographic outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy. EP Eur. 2007;9(2):113–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eul149.
Sahn DJ. Instrumentation and physical factors related to visualization of stenotic and regurgitant jets by Doppler color flow mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12(5):1354–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(88)92621-6.
Nestaas E, Schubert U, de Boode WP, El-Khuffash A. Tissue Doppler velocity imaging and event timings in neonates: a guide to image acquisition, measurement, interpretation, and reference values. Pediatr Res. 2018;84(Suppl 1):18–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-018-0079-8.
Eriksen BH, Nestaas E, Hole T, Liestøl K, Støylen A, Fugelseth D. Longitudinal assessment of atrioventricular annulus excursion by grey-scale m-mode and colour tissue Doppler imaging in premature infants. Early Hum Dev. 2013;89(12):977–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.09.006.
Mandysová E, Mráz T, Táborský M, Niederle P. Reproducibility of tissue Doppler parameters of asynchrony in patients with advanced LV dysfunction. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008;9(4):509–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euje.2007.08.005.
Blessberger H, Binder T. Two dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: basic principles. Heart 2010;96(9). https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2007.141002.
Geyer H, et al. Assessment of myocardial mechanics using speckle tracking echocardiography: fundamentals and clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr Off Publ Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2010.02.015.
Leitman M, et al. Two-dimensional strain-a novel software for real-time quantitative echocardiographic assessment of myocardial function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr Off Publ Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2004.06.019.
Reisner SA, Lysyansky P, Agmon Y, Mutlak D, Lessick J, Friedman Z. Global longitudinal strain: a novel index of left ventricular systolic function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr Off Publ Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2004.02.011.
Dandel M, Lehmkuhl H, Knosalla C, Suramelashvili N, Hetzer R. Strain and strain rate imaging by echocardiography—basic concepts and clinical applicability. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2009;5(2). https://doi.org/10.2174/157340309788166642.
Hayat D, et al. Comparison of real-time three-dimensional speckle tracking to magnetic resonance imaging in patients with coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.08.030.
Suhling M, Arigovindan M, Jansen C, Hunziker P, Unser M. Myocardial motion analysis from B-mode echocardiograms. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2005;14(4). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2004.838709.
Yu W, Yan P, Sinusas AJ, Thiele K, Duncan JS. Towards pointwise motion tracking in echocardiographic image sequences—comparing the reliability of different features for speckle tracking. Med Image Anal. 2006;10(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2005.12.003.
Paragios N. A level set approach for shape-driven segmentation and tracking of the left ventricle. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003;22(6). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2003.814785.
Elen A, et al. Three-dimensional cardiac strain estimation using spatio-temporal elastic registration of ultrasound images: a feasibility study. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2008;27(11). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2008.2004420.
Weissleder R, Pittet MJ. Imaging in the era of molecular oncology. Nature. 2008;452(7187):580–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06917.
Epstein FH. MR in mouse models of cardiac disease. NMR Biomed. 2007;20(3):238–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.1152.
Savchenko A, et al. Graphene biointerfaces for optical stimulation of cells. Sci Adv. 4(5):eaat0351. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat0351.
Huisken J, Swoger J, Del Bene F, Wittbrodt J, Stelzer EHK. Optical sectioning deep inside live embryos by selective plane illumination microscopy. Science. 2004;305(5686):1007–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100035.
Weber M, Mickoleit M, Huisken J. Chapter 11—light sheet microscopy. Methods Cell Biol. 2014;123. Waters JC, Wittman T. Eds. Academic Press. 2014;193–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420138-5.00011-2.
Levoy M, Ng R, Adams A, Footer M, Horowitz M. Light field microscopy. ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Papers, New York, NY, USA. 2006;924–934. https://doi.org/10.1145/1179352.1141976.
Prevedel R, et al. Simultaneous whole-animal 3D imaging of neuronal activity using light-field microscopy. Nat Methods 2014;11(7). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2964.
Pégard NC, Liu H-Y, Antipa N, Gerlock M, Adesnik H, Waller L. Compressive light-field microscopy for 3D neural activity recording. Optica. 2016;3(5):517–24. https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.3.000517.
Cong L, et al. Rapid whole brain imaging of neural activity in freely behaving larval zebrafish (Danio rerio). eLife 2017;6:e28158. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28158.
Wagner N, et al. Instantaneous isotropic volumetric imaging of fast biological processes. Nat Methods 2019;16(6). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0393-z.
• Wang Z, et al. Real-time volumetric reconstruction of biological dynamics with light-field microscopy and deep learning. Nat Methods 2021;18(5). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01058-x. This study offers a compelling solution for investigating the dynamic properties and functions of the cardiovascular system based on light-field microscopy and an easily adoptable deep-learning framework.
Ding Y, et al. Integrating light-sheet imaging with virtual reality to recapitulate developmental cardiac mechanics. JCI Insight 2017;2(22). https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.97180.
Wang Z, Ding Y, Satta S, Roustaei M, Fei P, Hsiai TK. A hybrid of light-field and light-sheet imaging to study myocardial function and intracardiac blood flow during zebrafish development. PLOS Comput Biol. 2021;17(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009175.
• Chen J, et al. Displacement analysis of myocardial mechanical deformation (DIAMOND) reveals segmental susceptibility to doxorubicin-induced injury and regeneration. JCI Insight 2019;4(8). https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.125362. This study developed a semiautomated method to assess the displacement of regional myocardial deformation, providing a new biomechanical insight into the in vivo analysis of cardiac contractile function.
Brock KK, Sharpe MB, Dawson LA, Kim SM, Jaffray DA. Accuracy of finite element model-based multi-organ deformable image registration. Med Phys. 2005;32(6):1647–59. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1915012.
Hill DL, Batchelor PG, Holden M, Hawkes DJ. Medical image registration. Phys Med Biol. 2001;46(3):R1-45. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/46/3/201.
Thirion JP. Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell’s demons. Med Image Anal. 1998;2(3):243–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1361-8415(98)80022-4.
O’Shea C, et al. Cardiac optical mapping—state-of-the-art and future challenges. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2020;126: 105804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2020.105804.
Huang D, et al. Optical Coherence Tomography. Science. 1991;254(5035):1178–81. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1957169.
Attizzani GF, Patrício L, Bezerra HG. Optical coherence tomography assessment of calcified plaque modification after rotational atherectomy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Off J Soc Card Angiogr Interv. 2013;81(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.23385.
Wang S, Larina I. Live mechanistic assessment of localized cardiac pumping in mammalian tubular embryonic heart. J Biomed Opt. 2020;25(8). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.25.8.086001.
Lv J, et al. Hemispherical photoacoustic imaging of myocardial infarction: in vivo detection and monitoring. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5209-x.
Hou J, et al. OCT Assessment of allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(6):662–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.01.018.
Zhang C, Wang LV, Cheng Y-J, Chen J, Wickline SA. Label-free photoacoustic microscopy of myocardial sheet architecture. J Biomed Opt. 2012;17(6): 060506. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.6.060506.
Wang LV, Hu S. Photoacoustic tomography: in vivo imaging from organelles to organs. Science. 2012;335(6075):1458–62. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216210.
Fernandez-Gonzalez R, et al. PyJAMAS: open-source, multimodal segmentation and analysis of microscopy images. Bioinformatics. 2022;38(2):594–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btab589.
Wen C, et al. 3DeeCellTracker, a deep learning-based pipeline for segmenting and tracking cells in 3D time lapse images. eLife 2021;10:e59187. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59187.
Beucher S. The watershed transformation applied to image segmentation. Scanning Microsc Suppl. 1992;299–314.
Wang MFZ, Hunter MV, Wang G, McFaul C, Yip CM, Fernandez-Gonzalez R. Automated cell tracking identifies mechanically oriented cell divisions during Drosophila axis elongation. Dev Camb Engl. 2017;144(7):1350–61. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.141473.
Lindsey ML, Iyer RP, Jung M, DeLeon-Pennell KY, Ma Y. Matrix metalloproteinases as input and output signals for post-myocardial infarction remodeling. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016;91:134–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.12.018.
Genet M, et al. Heterogeneous growth-induced prestrain in the heart. J Biomech. 2015;48(10):2080–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.03.012.
Gupta A, Eisen HJ. Cardiac-oncology: management of the patient with heart failure after chemotherapy. In Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Guide to Pathophysiology and Clinical Care, H. Eisen, Ed. London: Springer. 2017,309–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4219-5_13.
Dobson R, et al. BSE and BCOS Guideline for Transthoracic Echocardiographic Assessment of Adult Cancer Patients Receiving Anthracyclines and/or Trastuzumab. JACC Cardio Oncol. 2021;3(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccao.2021.01.011.
Čelutkienė J, et al. Role of cardiovascular imaging in cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic therapies: a position statement on behalf of the Heart Failure Association (HFA), the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the Cardio-Oncology Council of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22(9):1504–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1957.
Zamorano JL, et al. 2016 ESC position paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines: The Task Force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(36):2768–801. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw211.
Plana JC, et al. Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr Off Publ Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27(9):911–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.07.012.
Manrique CR, Park M, Tiwari N, Plana JC, Garcia MJ. Diagnostic strategies for early recognition of cancer therapeutics–related cardiac dysfunction. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2017;11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179546817697983.
Perez IE, Taveras Alam S, Hernandez GA, Sancassani R. Cancer Therapy-related cardiac dysfunction: an overview for the clinician. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2019;13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179546819866445.
Campbell JM, Hartjes KA, Nelson TJ, Xu X, Ekker SC. New and TALENted genome engineering toolbox. Circ Res. 2013;113(5):571–87. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.301765.
Kim J-D, Lee H-W, Jin S-W. Diversity is in my veins. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34(9):1838–45. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.303219.
Milan DJ, Jones IL, Ellinor PT, MacRae CA. In vivo recording of adult zebrafish electrocardiogram and assessment of drug-induced QT prolongation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;291(1):H269-273. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00960.2005.
Santoro MM. Antiangiogenic cancer drug using the zebrafish model. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34(9):1846–53. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.303221.
Sedmera D, et al. Functional and morphological evidence for a ventricular conduction system in zebrafish and Xenopus hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;284(4):H1152-1160. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00870.2002.
Packard RRS, et al. Automated segmentation of light-sheet fluorescent imaging to characterize experimental doxorubicin-induced cardiac injury and repair. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09152-x.
Lamounier E, Bucioli A, Cardoso A, Andrade A, Soares A. On the use of Augmented Reality techniques in learning and interpretation of cardiologic data. Ann Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol. 2010;2010:610–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5628019.
Koger CR, Hassan SS, Yuan J, Ding Y. Virtual reality for interactive medical analysis. Front Virtual Real. 2022;3. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frvir.2022.782854. Accessed 15 Mar 2022.
Abiri A, et al. Simulating developmental cardiac morphology in virtual reality using a deformable image registration approach. Ann Biomed Eng. 2018;46(12):2177–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-018-02113-z.
Kaluzynski K, Chen X, Emelianov SY, Skovoroda AR, O’Donnell M. Strain rate imaging using two-dimensional speckle tracking. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2001;48(4):1111–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/58.935730.
Helle-Valle T, et al. New noninvasive method for assessment of left ventricular rotation: speckle tracking echocardiography. Circulation. 2005;112(20):3149–56. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.531558.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH R00 HL148493 (YD) and the University of Texas at Dallas.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors would like to express gratitude to all other lab members for constructive discussion. All the authors contributed to the content in this review.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Heart Failure
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, X., Alexander, R.V., Yuan, J. et al. Computational Analysis of Cardiac Contractile Function. Curr Cardiol Rep 24, 1983–1994 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-022-01814-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-022-01814-1