Abstract
Purpose of Review
Subclinical cerebrovascular disease (sCVD) is highly prevalent in older adults. The main neuroimaging findings of sCVD include white matter hyperintensities and silent brain infarcts on T2-weighted MRI and cerebral microbleeds on gradient echo or susceptibility-weighted MRI. In this paper, we will review the epidemiology of sCVD, the current evidence for best medical management, and future directions for sCVD research.
Recent Findings
Numerous epidemiologic studies show that sCVD, in particular WMH, is an important risk factor for the development of dementia, stroke, worse outcomes after stroke, gait instability, late-life depression, and death. Effective treatment of sCVD could have major consequences for the brain health of a substantial portion of older Americans. Despite the link between sCVD and many vascular risk factors, such as hypertension or hyperlipidemia, the optimal medical treatment of sCVD remains uncertain.
Summary
Given the clinical equipoise about the risk versus benefit of aggressive medical management for sCVD, clinical trials to examine pragmatic, evidence-based approaches to management of sCVD are needed. Such a trial could provide much needed guidance on how to manage a common clinical scenario facing internists and neurologists in practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Subclinical cerebrovascular disease (sCVD) is highly prevalent and is estimated to be present in greater than 70% of community-based adults aged 60 years and above [1,2,3]. The main neuroimaging findings of sCVD include white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) and silent brain infarcts (SBIs) on T2-weighted MRI and cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) on gradient echo and susceptibility weighted imaging MRI (Fig. 1) [4]. The risk factors that have the strongest association with sCVD are advanced age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and intra- and extracranial large artery atherosclerotic disease [5,6,7,8]. The symptomatic cognitive manifestations of sCVD were first described by the Swiss neurologist Otto Binswanger in the late nineteenth century, shortly thereafter expanded upon by Alois Alzheimer’s histopathological description in 1902 of diffuse loss of cerebral white matter myelin and axons accompanied by gliosis and atrophy [9, 10]. Subsequent research after the advent of MRI has shown that sCVD, in particular WMH, is an important risk factor for the development of diverse symptomatic manifestations including dementia, stroke, worse outcomes after stroke, gait instability, late-life depression, and death [6, 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
The number of publications on sCVD has increased dramatically in the last decade as the focus has transitioned from longitudinal studies of its epidemiology to clinical trials testing intervention to treat the condition. Longitudinal studies have shown that hypertension and smoking are associated with the progression of WMH burden [19,20,21], and effective hypertension control can prevent WMH progression [22,23,24]. Effective treatment of sCVD could have major consequences for the brain health of a substantial proportion of older Americans. Despite the link between many vascular risk factors and sCVD, the optimal medical treatment of sCVD remains uncertain, and no guidelines exist concerning sCVD medical management in otherwise asymptomatic patients. Although aggressive medical management is effective at preventing stroke, we do not know if it is effective and safe in the primary prevention of stroke and cognitive decline in patients with sCVD [25]. The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial Memory and Cognition in Decreased Hypertension (SPRINT MIND) study recently provided evidence that aggressive blood pressure (BP) control may reduce the development of mild cognitive impairment, but the parent SPRINT trial utilized a unimodal intervention and was terminated early for overall cardiovascular benefits without a clear stroke preventive effect [26, 27]. Given these findings, there is renewed interest in sCVD. In this paper, we will review the epidemiology of sCVD, the current evidence for best medical management, and future research directions.
Epidemiology
Although autopsy studies have long shown that asymptomatic stroke is a common finding [28], the high prevalence of sCVD was not fully appreciated until the advent of modern CT and, more importantly, MRI [29]. WMH, SBI, and CMB can all be relatively asymptomatic and likely share overlapping pathophysiology. Patients frequently have concomitant features of sCVD, such as both WMH and CMB [30,31,32,33,34]. There is conflicting data on the prevalence of sCVD by gender, but it does appear to be more prevalent in Blacks and Caucasians than Hispanics, but this difference may be largely explained by risk factors [5, 35].
Although the burden of perivascular spaces has been proposed as part of the sCVD spectrum, there are too few high-quality studies to include them in the definition of sCVD for this article. However, as additional data becomes available, a large burden of dilated perivascular spaces may emerge as part of sCVD in its own right [4]. sCVD can accompany additional imaging findings that may not be clinically apparent, namely brain volume loss [36, 37]. While the prevalence of sCVD and brain volume loss both independently increase with age, there is some evidence of an independent association between sCVD and brain atrophy that is independent of age [38].
WMHs are more common than SBI or CMB and are thought to be secondary to degenerative changes of small vessels with a range of possible pathological mechanisms including lipohyalinosis and loss of myelinated axons [39]. WMHs are most commonly seen in the deep and periventricular white matter, pons, and cerebellum [40]. Measurement of WMH can be done qualitatively using ordinal scales, most commonly the Fazekas scale, which ranges from 0 to 3 and has been validated in numerous publication. [40,41,42]. WMH volume can also be measured in cubic centimeters (cm3) using validated algorithmic approaches that rely on computer segmentation of the abnormal hyperintense T2 signal from normal T2 signal in brain parenchyma [43, 44]. WMHs increase significantly with age and medical comorbidities, but they can be seen even in healthy young populations. The WMH prevalence also varies significantly depending on the study design and patient population. For example, in a cohort with a mean age of 34, there was a 6% prevalence of WMH, whereas the Cerebral Abnormalities in Migraine, an Epidemiological Risk Analysis (CAMERA) study found a prevalence of 42% in non-migraine control individuals aged 30 to 40 years old. [45, 46] In the Rotterdam Scan Study of 1077 participants ages 60–90 years old who underwent brain MRI, investigators found that 92% had periventricular or subcortical WMH [47].
Several studies have established a cross-sectional relationship between hypertension and WMH [48,49,50]. Longitudinal studies have also established the relationship between hypertension and progression of WMH over time [51]. Perhaps the most important study is Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC), which looked at BP measurements and WMH progression over nearly 20 years. In this cohort, a 20-mmHg higher estimated mean daily systolic BP was associated with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.0 for being in the top quintile of WMH progression [52]. WMH has also been linked to intracranial atherosclerosis, for both symptomatic and asymptomatic intracranial steno-occlusive disease [53, 54]. The burden of WMH is correlated with risk of stroke, worse outcome after stroke, gait impairment, and cognitive impairment [6, 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. The cognitive impairment primarily involves executive function, visuospatial memory and organization, visual scanning and motor speed, and new learning, but seems to spare verbal memory [42, 55]. WMHs are also associated with depression in elderly patients, leading to a vascular depression hypothesis [56,57,58]. These lesions are often found in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [59].
Lacunar SBI is associated with older age and other cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and smoking, while subcortical SBI is associated with subclinical atrial fibrillation or large artery atherosclerosis [35]. Lacunar infarcts, in particular, are often asymptomatic and found incidentally on MRI imaging [60]. In the Rotterdam Scan Study, SBIs were five times more common than symptomatic infarctions [61]. In their study population, aged 60 to 90 years old, there was an overall 20% incidence of SBI. Some studies report an incidence as high as 49%, but most agree with ~ 20% incidence in asymptomatic populations [62, 63]. Age has the strongest association with SBIs, which are prevalent in only 8% of patients aged 60 to 64 years old, but up to 35% of patients > 80 years old [61].
The main risk factor for lacunar SBI is undiagnosed hypertension, which affects over 12 million Americans [64]. There is some evidence that asymptomatic and symptomatic lacunar infarcts may result from two distinct entities. For example, asymptomatic lacunar infarcts are more closely associated with hypertension and WMH than symptomatic lacunar infarcts [65]. Lacunar SBIs were associated with a higher stroke recurrence rate, mortality, and disability compared to symptomatic lacunar infarcts in a prospective cross-sectional study [66]. Lacunar SBIs are also found more frequently in patients with vasculopathies such as sickle cell anemia and cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) (Fig. 2) [67, 68]. Cortical SBIs are associated with atrial fibrillation, both as a known or new diagnosis [69, 70]. Large artery atherosclerosis also frequently coexists in patients with cortical SBI, which manifests as both intracranial and extracranial stenosis [71]. In patients with unilateral carotid stenosis and SBI, cortical SBIs are more often ipsilateral to their carotid disease [72, 73].
CMBs are often seen incidentally seen on MRI with no clear associated symptoms. The prevalence of CMB is 6% in individuals aged 45–50 years old but increases to 36% after the age of 80 years [3]. CMBs related to hypertension are most often in the same locations as WMH and lacunar SBI, specifically the basal ganglia, pons, and cerebellum (Fig. 2) [34, 74]. Hypertension is also shown to increase the risk for longitudinal progression of the CMB burden [75]. Multiple lobar CMBs are more closely related to cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) than with hypertension. The prevalence of moderate to severe CAA is 2.3% between 65 and 74 years of age but rises up to 12.1% in those over 85 years old [76]. Lobar CMBs are also associated with elevated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and decreased triglycerides, and the APOE e4 allele [77]. Although a definitive CAA diagnosis is confirmed on postmortem evaluation showing amyloid deposition in the arterial walls, the Boston criteria allow for probable and possible diagnosis in the living [78].
There are conflicting data regarding whether the presence of CMB is a risk factor for the development of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after thrombolysis with intravenous Alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. [79,80,81]. However, the number of CMB mediates this risk. Compared to patients with only a handful of CMB, those with > 10 CMBs have considerably more risk of sICH and poor clinical outcome at 3 months [82]. Finally, CMBs are also associated with autonomic dysfunction such as postprandial hypotension [83].
Medical Management of Subclinical CVD
sCVD is a common and meaningful finding in the general population, particularly the elderly. The optimal medical treatment of sCVD remains a major knowledge gap that has important implications for brain health. Despite the heterogenous imaging findings in sCVD, ranging from microvascular ischemia to large cortical infarcts to microhemorrhages, the risk factor profiles have considerable overlap. As such, the medical treatments that are effective for one component of sCVD may well be effective for other components. There are, of course, exceptions. For example, cortical SBI should trigger an evaluation for atrial fibrillation and large artery atherosclerosis, while lobar CMB could suggest cerebral amyloid angiopathy.
Nevertheless, hypertension is, by far, the single most important modifiable risk factor for sCVD and the one for which we have the most data, especially in relation to WMH. In a secondary analysis of ACCORD-MIND, we recently showed that the progression of WMH was lower in the intensive (< 120 mmHg) versus standard BP control (< 140 mmHg) randomization arm (∆WMH = 0.67 ± 0.95 cm3 versus 1.16 ± 1.13 cm3, p < 0.001) [24]. Similar findings were shown in SPRINT MIND, although the results have only been presented at conference at the time of this article [84]. SPRINT MIND also reported a lower incidence of MCI with intensive BP control [26]. The ROCAS study reported that statins could slow the progression of WMH [85]. The FINGER trial also showed that a multidomain intervention, including diet, exercise, and vascular risk monitoring, could reduce cognitive decline [86]. These results support the possibility that altering longitudinal exposure to hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and poor cardiovascular health could slow sCVD progression and decrease sCVD-related morbidity.
However, data are scarce and conflicting on whether aggressive medical management is safe in sCVD. Statin therapy may increase the risk of hemorrhagic forms of stroke, a particular concern in patients with advanced WMH or CMB at baseline [87, 88]. In ACCORD-MIND, BP lowering to < 120/80 mmHg was associated with greater loss of total brain volume [89]. The cardiovascular and cognitive benefits of lowering SBP to < 120 mmHg seen in SPRINT and SPRINT MIND came with an increase in other adverse events such as syncope and kidney injury [27]. The Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial recently showed higher mortality in healthy elderly patients taking aspirin, mainly due to cancer-related death [90]. As such, the benefit of aspirin in sCVD is not clear unless there is a compelling alternate indication such as symptomatic coronary artery disease.
Conclusions
sCVD is an important disease state that is an effect of aging but also of common cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia. The current evidence base does not have adequate detail to determine if aggressive treatment of cardiovascular risk factors translates into risk reduction for stroke, heart disease, or dementia for this patient population. Primary prevention trials typically require large sample sizes and extended follow-up to detect small decreases in absolute risk. sCVD is unique in that the clinical manifestations are numerous, such as cognitive impairment, stroke, or depression, possibly allowing for larger effect sizes in absolute risk reduction for composite outcomes that include several symptomatic manifestations of sCVD. In addition, the neuroimaging components of sCVD, such as WMH, are robust enough biomarkers to be a viable primary outcome in a phase III trial. The number of eligible patients for such a trial would be substantial given the high prevalence of sCVD and the frequent use of CT and MRI in healthy adults in the USA [91,92,93,94]. Given the clinical equipoise about the risk versus benefit of aggressive medical management for sCVD, a clinical trial to examine pragmatic, evidence-driven approaches to management of sCVD is warranted. Such a trial could provide much needed guidance on how to manage this common clinical scenario with a high impact on the brain health of the overall population.
References
Bryan RN, Cai J, Burke G, Hutchinson RG, Liao D, Toole JF, et al. Prevalence and anatomic characteristics of infarct-like lesions on MR images of middle-aged adults: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20(7):1273–80.
Liao D, Cooper L, Cai J, Toole JF, Bryan NR, Hutchinson RG, et al. Presence and severity of cerebral white matter lesions and hypertension, its treatment, and its control: the ARIC study. Stroke. 1996;27(12):2262–70.
Poels MMF, Ikram MA, van der Lugt A, Hofman A, Krestin GP, Breteler MMB, et al. Incidence of cerebral microbleeds in the general population: the Rotterdam scan study. Stroke. 2011;42(3):656–61.
Debette S, Schilling S, Duperron M-G, Larsson SC, Markus HS. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging markers of vascular brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(1):81–94.
Prabhakaran S, Wright CB, Yoshita M, Delapaz R, Brown T, DeCarli C, et al. Prevalence and determinants of subclinical brain infarction: the northern Manhattan study. Neurology. 2008;70(6):425–30.
Vermeer SE, Hollander M, van Dijk EJ, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Breteler MMB, et al. Silent brain infarcts and white matter lesions increase stroke risk in the general population: the Rotterdam Scan Study. Stroke. 2003;34(5):1126–9.
Kawamoto A, Shimada K, Matsubayashi K, Nishinaga M, Kimura S, Ozawa T. Factors associated with silent multiple lacunar lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic elderly hypertensive patients. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1991;18(9):605–10.
Brott T, Tomsick T, Feinberg W, Johnson C, Biller J, Broderick J, et al. Baseline silent cerebral infarction in the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 1994;25(6):1122–9.
Santamaria Ortiz J, Knight PV. Review: Binswanger’s disease, leukoaraiosis and dementia. Age Ageing. 1994;23(1):75–81.
Ball MJ. “Leukoaraiosis” explained. Lancet Lond Engl. 1989;1(8638):612–3.
Prins ND, van Dijk EJ, den Heijer T, Vermeer SE, Jolles J, Koudstaal PJ, et al. Cerebral small-vessel disease and decline in information processing speed, executive function and memory. Brain J Neurol. 2005;128(Pt 9):2034–41.
Mok V, Kim JS. Prevention and management of cerebral small vessel disease. J Stroke. 2015;17(2):111–22.
Mosley TH, Knopman DS, Catellier DJ, Bryan N, Hutchinson RG, Grothues CA, et al. Cerebral MRI findings and cognitive functioning: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Neurology. 2005;64(12):2056–62.
Vermeer SE, Prins ND, den Heijer T, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Breteler MMB. Silent brain infarcts and the risk of dementia and cognitive decline. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(13):1215–22.
Au R, Massaro JM, Wolf PA, Young ME, Beiser A, Seshadri S, et al. Association of White Matter Hyperintensity Volume with Decreased Cognitive Functioning: the Framingham Heart Study. Arch Neurol. 2006;63(2):246–50.
Rost NS, Rahman R, Sonni S, Kanakis A, Butler C, Massasa E, et al. Determinants of white matter hyperintensity volume in patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Off J Natl Stroke Assoc. 2010;19(3):230–5.
Kuller LH, Longstreth WT, Arnold AM, Bernick C, Bryan RN, Beauchamp NJ. White matter hyperintensity on cranial magnetic resonance imaging: a predictor of stroke. Stroke. 2004;35(8):1821–5.
Debette S, Beiser A, DeCarli C, Au R, Himali JJ, Kelly-Hayes M, et al. Association of MRI markers of vascular brain injury with incident stroke, mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and mortality: the Framingham Offspring Study. Stroke. 2010;41(4):600–6.
Power MC, Deal JA, Sharrett AR, Jack CR, Knopman D, Mosley TH, et al. Smoking and white matter hyperintensity progression: the ARIC-MRI study. Neurology. 2015;84(8):841–8.
Gottesman RF, Coresh J, Catellier DJ, Sharrett AR, Rose KM, Coker LH, et al. Blood pressure and white-matter disease progression in a biethnic cohort: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Stroke. 2010;41(1):3–8.
Longstreth WT, Arnold AM, Beauchamp NJ, Manolio TA, Lefkowitz D, Jungreis C, et al. Incidence, manifestations, and predictors of worsening white matter on serial cranial magnetic resonance imaging in the elderly: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Stroke. 2005;36(1):56–61.
Dufouil C, Chalmers J, Coskun O, Besançon V, Bousser M-G, Guillon P, et al. Effects of blood pressure lowering on cerebral white matter hyperintensities in patients with stroke: the PROGRESS (perindopril protection against recurrent stroke study) magnetic resonance imaging substudy. Circulation. 2005;112(11):1644–50.
Godin O, Tzourio C, Maillard P, Mazoyer B, Dufouil C. Antihypertensive treatment and change in blood pressure are associated with the progression of white matter lesion volumes: the Three-City (3C)-Dijon magnetic resonance imaging study. Circulation. 2011;123(3):266–73.
de Havenon A, Majersik JJ, Tirschwell DL, McNally JS, Stoddard G, Rost NS. Blood pressure, glycemic control, and white matter hyperintensity progression in type 2 diabetics. Neurology. 2019;92(11):e1168–75.
Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Fiorella D, Turan TN, Janis LS, et al. Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial. Lancet. 2014;383(9914):333–41.
SPRINT MIND Investigators for the SPRINT Research Group, Williamson JD, Pajewski NM, Auchus AP, Bryan RN, Chelune G, et al. Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control on Probable Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;321(6):553–61.
SPRINT Research Group, Wright JT, Williamson JD, Whelton PK, Snyder JK, Sink KM, et al. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2103–16.
Shinkawa A, Ueda K, Kiyohara Y, Kato I, Sueishi K, Tsuneyoshi M, et al. Silent cerebral infarction in a community-based autopsy series in Japan. Hisayama Stud Stroke. 1995;26(3):380–5.
Vermeer SE, Longstreth WT, Koudstaal PJ. Silent brain infarcts: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(7):611–9.
Roob G, Schmidt R, Kapeller P, Lechner A, Hartung HP, Fazekas F. MRI evidence of past cerebral microbleeds in a healthy elderly population. Neurology. 1999;52(5):991–4.
Koennecke H-C. Cerebral microbleeds on MRI: prevalence, associations, and potential clinical implications. Neurology. 2006;66(2):165–71.
Kato H, Izumiyama M, Izumiyama K, Takahashi A, Itoyama Y. Silent cerebral microbleeds on T2*-weighted MRI: correlation with stroke subtype, stroke recurrence, and leukoaraiosis. Stroke. 2002;33(6):1536–40.
Hanyu H, Tanaka Y, Shimizu S, Takasaki M, Fujita H, Kaneko N, et al. Cerebral microbleeds in Binswanger’s disease: a gradient-echo T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurosci Lett. 2003;340(3):213–6.
Naka H, Nomura E, Wakabayashi S, Kajikawa H, Kohriyama T, Mimori Y, et al. Frequency of asymptomatic microbleeds on T2*-weighted MR images of patients with recurrent stroke: association with combination of stroke subtypes and leukoaraiosis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25(5):714–9.
Wright CB, Chuanhui D, Perez Enmanuel J, Janet DR, Mitsuhiro Y, Tatjana R, et al. Subclinical cerebrovascular disease increases the risk of incident stroke and mortality: the Northern Manhattan Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 6(9):e004069.
Moroni F, Ammirati E, Magnoni M, D’Ascenzo F, Anselmino M, Anzalone N, et al. Carotid atherosclerosis, silent ischemic brain damage and brain atrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2016;223:681–7.
O’Sullivan M, Rich PM, Barrick TR, Clark CA, Markus HS. Frequency of subclinical lacunar infarcts in ischemic leukoaraiosis and cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(7):1348–54.
Appelman APA, Exalto LG, van der Graaf Y, Biessels GJ, Mali WPTM, Geerlings MI. White matter lesions and brain atrophy: more than shared risk factors? A Systematic Review. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;28(3):227–42.
Shim YS, Yang D-W, Roe CM, Coats MA, Benzinger TL, Xiong C, et al. Pathological correlates of white matter hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2015;39(1–2):92–104.
Fazekas F, Barkhof F, Wahlund LO, Pantoni L, Erkinjuntti T, Scheltens P, et al. CT and MRI rating of white matter lesions. Cerebrovasc Dis Basel Switz. 2002;13(Suppl 2):31–6.
Fazekas F, Kleinert R, Offenbacher H, Schmidt R, Kleinert G, Payer F, et al. Pathologic correlates of incidental MRI white matter signal hyperintensities. Neurology. 1993;43(9):1683–1683.
Schmidt R, Berghold A, Jokinen H, Gouw AA, van der Flier WM, Barkhof F, et al. White matter lesion progression in LADIS: frequency, clinical effects, and sample size calculations. Stroke. 2012;43(10):2643–7.
Lao Z, Shen D, Liu D, Jawad AF, Melhem ER, Launer LJ, et al. Computer-assisted segmentation of white matter lesions in 3D MR images using support vector machine. Acad Radiol. 2008;15(3):300–13.
Goldszal AF, Davatzikos C, Pham DL, Yan MX, Bryan RN, Resnick SM. An image-processing system for qualitative and quantitative volumetric analysis of brain images. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22(5):827–37.
Kruit MC, Launer LJ, Ferrari MD, van Buchem MA. Infarcts in the posterior circulation territory in migraine. The population-based MRI CAMERA study. Brain J Neurol. 2005;128(Pt 9):2068–77.
Figiel GS, Krishnan KR, Rao VP, Doraiswamy M, Ellinwood EH, Nemeroff CB, et al. Subcortical hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison of normal and bipolar subjects. J Neuropsychiatr Clin Neurosci. 1991;3(1):18–22.
de Leeuw F-E, de Groot JC, Achten E, Oudkerk M, Ramos L, Heijboer R, et al. Prevalence of cerebral white matter lesions in elderly people: a population based magnetic resonance imaging study. The Rotterdam Scan Study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70(1):9–14.
van Swieten JC, Geyskes GG, Derix MMA, Peeck BM, Ramos LMP, van Latum JC, et al. Hypertension in the elderly is associated with white matter lesions and cognitive decline. Ann Neurol. 1991;30(6):825–30.
de Leeuw F-E, de Groot JC, Oudkerk M, Witteman JCM, Hofman A, van Gijn J, et al. Hypertension and cerebral white matter lesions in a prospective cohort study. Brain. 2002;125(4):765–72.
Longstreth WT, Manolio TA, Alice A, Burke Gregory L, Nick B, Jungreis Charles A, et al. Clinical correlates of white matter findings on cranial magnetic resonance imaging of 3301 elderly people. Stroke. 1996;27(8):1274–82.
Verhaaren Benjamin FJ, Vernooij MW, De Boer R, Hofman A, Niessen WJ, van der Lugt A, et al. High blood pressure and cerebral white matter lesion progression in the general population. Hypertension. 2013;61(6):1354–9.
Gottesman RF, Josef C, Catellier Diane J, Richey SA, Rose Kathryn M, Coker Laura H, et al. Blood pressure and white-matter disease progression in a Biethnic cohort. Stroke. 2010;41(1):3–8.
Nam K-W, Kwon H-M, Jeong H-Y, Park J-H, Kim SH, Jeong S-M, et al. Cerebral white matter hyperintensity is associated with intracranial atherosclerosis in a healthy population. Atherosclerosis. 2017;265:179–83.
Park J-H, Kwon H-M, Lee J, Kim D-S, Ovbiagele B. Association of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with severity of white matter hyperintensities. Eur J Neurol. 2015;22(1):44–52 e2-3.
Au R, Massaro JM, Wolf PA, Young ME, Beiser A, Seshadri S, et al. Association of white matter hyperintensity volume with decreased cognitive functioning: the Framingham Heart Study. Arch Neurol. 2006;63(2):246–50.
Lee JJ, Lee EY, Lee SB, Park JH, Kim TH, Jeong H-G, et al. Impact of white matter lesions on depression in the patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Psychiatry Investig. 2015;12(4):516–22.
Rabins PV, Pearlson GD, Aylward E, Kumar AJ, Dowell K. Cortical magnetic resonance imaging changes in elderly inpatients with major depression. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148(5):617–20.
O’Brien JT, Firbank MJ, Krishnan MS, van Straaten ECW, van der Flier WM, Petrovic K, et al. White matter hyperintensities rather than lacunar infarcts are associated with depressive symptoms in older people: the LADIS study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;14(10):834–41.
Thomas AJ, O’Brien JT, Davis S, Ballard C, Barber R, Kalaria RN, et al. Ischemic basis for deep white matter hyperintensities in major depression: a neuropathological study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59(9):785–92.
Kolominsky-Rabas PL, Weber M, Gefeller O, Neundoerfer B, Heuschmann PU. Epidemiology of ischemic stroke subtypes according to TOAST criteria incidence, recurrence, and long-term survival in ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study. Stroke. 2001;32(12):2735–40.
Vermeer SE, Koudstaal PJ, Oudkerk M, Hofman A, Breteler MMB. Prevalence and risk factors of silent brain infarcts in the population-based Rotterdam Scan Study. Stroke. 2002;33(1):21–5.
Aono Y, Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, Hara A, Kondo T, Obara T, et al. Plasma fibrinogen, ambulatory blood pressure, and silent cerebrovascular lesions: the Ohasama study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27(4):963–8.
Fanning JP, Wong AA, Fraser JF. The epidemiology of silent brain infarction: a systematic review of population-based cohorts. BMC Med. 2014;12:119.
Wall HK, Hannan JA, Wright JS. Patients with undiagnosed hypertension. JAMA. 2014;312(19):1973–4.
Boiten J, Lodder J, Kessels F. Two clinically distinct lacunar infarct entities? A hypothesis. Stroke. 1993;24(5):652–6.
de Jong G, Kessels F, Lodder J. Two types of lacunar infarcts. Stroke. 2002;33(8):2072–6.
DeBaun MR, Sarnaik SA, Rodeghier MJ, Minniti CP, Howard TH, Iyer RV, et al. Associated risk factors for silent cerebral infarcts in sickle cell anemia: low baseline hemoglobin, sex, and relative high systolic blood pressure. Blood. 2012;119(16):3684–90.
O’Sullivan M, Rich PM, Barrick TR, Clark CA, Markus HS. Frequency of subclinical lacunar infarcts in ischemic leukoaraiosis and cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy. Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(7):1348–54.
Kempster PA, Gerraty RP, Gates PC. Asymptomatic cerebral infarction in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 1988;19(8):955–7.
Hahne K, Mönnig G, Samol A. Atrial fibrillation and silent stroke: links, risks, and challenges. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016;12:65–74.
Takahashi W, Fujii H, Ide M, Takagi S, Shinohara Y. Atherosclerotic changes in intracranial and extracranial large arteries in apparently healthy persons with asymptomatic lacunar infarction. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;14(1):17–22.
Tejada J, Díez-Tejedor E, Hernández-Echebarría L, Balboa O. Does a relationship exist between carotid stenosis and lacunar infarction? Stroke. 2003;34(6):1404–9.
Hediyeh B, Gino G, Edward M, Gulce A, Hooman K, Ajay G. Silent brain infarction in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery atherosclerotic disease. Stroke. 2016;47(5):1368–70.
Igase M, Tabara Y, Igase K, Nagai T, Ochi N, Kido T, et al. Asymptomatic cerebral microbleeds seen in healthy subjects have a strong association with asymptomatic lacunar infarction. Circ J. 2009;16:0901140237–7.
Gregoire SM, Brown MM, Kallis C, Jäger HR, Yousry TA, Werring DJ. MRI detection of new microbleeds in patients with ischemic stroke: five-year cohort follow-up study. Stroke. 2010;41(1):184–6.
Greenberg SM, Charidimou A. Diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: evolution of the Boston criteria. Stroke. 2018;49(2):491–7.
Poels Mariëlle MF, Vernooij MW, Arfan IM, Albert H, Krestin Gabriel P, van der Lugt A, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of cerebral microbleeds. Stroke. 2010;41(10_suppl_1):S103–6.
Charidimou A, Gang Q, Werring DJ. Sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy revisited: recent insights into pathophysiology and clinical spectrum. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83(2):124–37.
Tsivgoulis G, Zand R, Katsanos AH, Turc G, Nolte CH, Jung S, et al. Risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke and high cerebral microbleed burden: a meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(6):675–83.
Shoamanesh A, Kwok CS, Lim PA, Benavente OR. Postthrombolysis intracranial hemorrhage risk of cerebral microbleeds in acute stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke Off J Int Stroke Soc. 2013;8(5):348–56.
Charidimou A, Shoamanesh A, Wilson D, Gang Q, Fox Z, Jäger HR, et al. Cerebral microbleeds and postthrombolysis intracerebral hemorrhage risk. Neurology. 2015;85(11):927–34.
Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, et al. 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49(3):e46–110.
Kohara K, Jiang Y, Igase M, Takata Y, Fukuoka T, Okura T, et al. Postprandial hypotension is associated with asymptomatic cerebrovascular damage in essential hypertensive patients. Hypertens Dallas Tex 1979. 1999;33(1 Pt 2):565–8.
SPRINT MIND Trial Finds Lower Risk of MCI and Dementia With Lower BP [Internet]. American College of Cardiology. [cited 2018 Aug 16]. Available from: http%3a%2f%2fwww.acc.org%2flatest-in-cardiology%2farticles%2f2018%2f07%2f26%2f16%2f36%2fsprint-mind-trial-finds-lower-risk-of-mci-and-dementia-with-lower-bp. Accessed 22 June 2019.
Mok VCT, Lam WWM, Fan YH, Wong A, Ng PW, Tsoi TH, et al. Effects of statins on the progression of cerebral white matter lesion: post hoc analysis of the ROCAS (regression of cerebral artery stenosis) study. J Neurol. 2009;256(5):750–7.
Ngandu T, Lehtisalo J, Solomon A, Levälahti E, Ahtiluoto S, Antikainen R, et al. A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9984):2255–63.
Romero JR, Preis SR, Beiser A, DeCarli C, Viswanathan A, Martinez-Ramirez S, et al. Risk factors, stroke prevention treatments, and prevalence of cerebral microbleeds in the Framingham Heart Study. Stroke. 2014;45(5):1492–4.
Lei C, Wu B, Liu M, Chen Y. Association between statin use and intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2014;21(2):192–8.
Williamson JD, Launer LJ, Bryan RN, Coker LH, Lazar RM, Gerstein HC, et al. Cognitive function and brain structure in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus after intensive lowering of blood pressure and lipid levels: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(3):324–33.
McNeil JJ, Nelson MR, Woods RL, Lockery JE, Wolfe R, Reid CM, et al. Effect of aspirin on all-cause mortality in the healthy elderly. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(16):1519–28.
Isaac T, Rosenthal MB, Colla CH, Morden NE, Mainor AJ, Li Z, et al. Measuring overuse with electronic health records data. Am J Manag Care. 2018;24(1):19–25.
Klang E, Beytelman A, Greenberg D, Or J, Guranda L, Konen E, et al. Overuse of head CT Examinations for the Investigation of minor head trauma: analysis of contributing factors. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(2):171–6.
Melnick ER, Szlezak CM, Bentley SK, Dziura JD, Kotlyar S, Post LA. CT overuse for mild traumatic brain injury. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012;38(11):483–9.
Bermingham SL. The appropriate use of neuroimaging in the diagnostic work-up of dementia: an economic literature review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2014;14(2):1–67.
Funding
Dr. de Havenon, NIH/NINDS K23NS105924.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Adam de Havenon, Chelsea Meyer, J. Scott McNally, Matthew Alexander, and Lee Chung declare no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Havenon, A., Meyer, C., McNally, J.S. et al. Subclinical Cerebrovascular Disease: Epidemiology and Treatment. Curr Atheroscler Rep 21, 39 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-019-0799-1
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-019-0799-1