Abstract
In this paper we connect a celebrated theorem of Nyman and Beurling on the equivalence between the Riemann hypothesis and the density of some functional space in \( L^2(0, 1)\) to a trigonometric series considered first by Hardy and Littlewood (see (3.4)). We highlight some of its curious analytical and arithmetical properties.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The main purpose of this work is to bring to light a new relationship between two facets of Riemann’s zeta function: On the one hand a functional analysis approach to the Riemann hypothesis due to Nymann and Beurling, and on the other hand a trigonometric series first studied by Hardy and Littlewood [16], and then followed by Flett [15], Segal [25] and Delange [13]. The trigonometric series in question is
It differs from the finite sum \(\displaystyle \sum \nolimits _{n\le x} \frac{1}{n} \sin \frac{x}{n} \), as x tends to \(\infty \), by
Hardy and Littlewood proved [16] that, as x tends to \(\infty \),
and that
from the fact that for \(x\ge 5 \), the number of \(n\le x\) whose prime divisors are equivalent to 1 modulo 4 is \(\displaystyle C \frac{x}{(\log x)^{\frac{1}{2}}}\), where C is a constant. Delange [13] showed that \({\mathfrak {f}} (x)\) is not bounded on the real line only from the following result on the reciprocals of primes in arithmetic progressions
and obtained the \(\Omega \)-result of Hardy and Littlewood just because
This trigonometric series, despite its simplicity, has many similarities with the Riemann zeta function [15] and deep relation to the divisor functions through the sawtooth function
For \(s\in {{\mathbb {C}}}\) we define
so that \(\displaystyle n^s \sigma _s(n)= \sigma ^s(n)\). For example if we define
and
then the divisors and the fractional parts functions are related by
Similarly [32] (p.70):
We will see ((3.5) with \(f(2\pi x)= \sin x \)) an integral representation of the partial sums of \( {\mathfrak {f}} (x)\), using the sawtooth function.
2 Nyman–Beurling Criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis
2.1 Nyman–Beurling Theorem
For \(x>0\), let \(\rho (x)\) be the fractional part of x so that \(\rho (x)=x-{\left\lfloor x \right\rfloor }\). To each \(0 < \theta \le 1 \) we associate the function \(\displaystyle \rho _{\theta }(x) = \rho (\frac{\theta }{x})\). Then \(0\le \rho _{\theta }(x) \le 1 \) and \(\displaystyle \rho _{\theta }(x)= \frac{\theta }{x} \) if \(\theta <x \). We introduce, as in [4,5,6,7, 14, 22, 29] and the more recent book [23]
Each function in \({\mathcal M}\) has at most a countable set of points of discontinuity, and is identically zero for \(x>0\).
Theorem 2.1
(Nyman–Beurling) Let \(1< p\le \infty \). The subspace \( \mathcal M\) is dense in the Banach space \(L^p(0, 1) \) if and only if the Riemann zeta function \(\zeta (s)\) has no zero in the right half plane \(\displaystyle {{\text {Re}}}s> \frac{1}{p}. \)
The fundamental relations in the proof of this theorem are
which is just a variant of the classical representation
It follows from (2.1) that for \(f(x)\in {\mathcal M} \)
The study of the function \({\mathfrak {f}}(x) \) is intimately linked to that of following function
We have the formal Fourier series expansion [11, 12]
where
Davenport considered the cases of
These arithmetical functions have their usual number-theoretic meanings. For example if \(\omega (n)\) is the number of distinct prime factors of n or, in other terms, \(\displaystyle \omega (n)= \sum \nolimits _{b\mid n} 1\) and \(\omega (1)= 0\), then the Möbius function \(\mu (n)\) is defined by
and the Von Mangoldt function \(\Lambda (n) \) is defined by
In the case of the Möbius function \(a_n= \mu (n)\), Davenport uses Vinogradov’s method, a refinement of Weyl’s method on estimating trigonometric sums, to prove that for any fixed h
uniformly in \(x\in {{\mathbb {R}}}/{{\mathbb {Z}}}\). The implied constants are not effective. There have been several results justifying (2.3) for other particular sequences \((a_n)\). The most general problem is considered in [17].
It should be noted that the Davenport or Hardy Littlewood estimates admit a common analysis. For the convenience of the reader we gather together a few classical results on exponential sums. Let \(\mathbf{I}\) be an interval of length at most \(N\ge 1\) and let \(f: \mathbf{I} \rightarrow {{\mathbb {R}}}\) be a smooth function satisfying the estimates \(x\in \mathbf{I}, 2\le N\ll T, j\ge 1\)
then with \(f(x)= e^x\)
-
(1)
Van der Corput estimate: For any natural number \(k\ge 2\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} \displaystyle \frac{1}{N} \sum _{n\in \mathbf{I}} e(f(n))= O\left( \frac{T}{N^k}^{\frac{1}{2^k-2}} \log ^{\frac{1}{2}}(2+T)\right) \end{aligned}$$(2.5) -
(2)
Vinogradov estimate: For some absolute constant \(c>0\).
$$\begin{aligned} \displaystyle \frac{1}{N} \sum _{n\in \mathbf{I}} e(f(n)) \ll N^{-\frac{c}{k^2}}. \end{aligned}$$(2.6)
2.2 The Functions \({\left\lfloor x \right\rfloor },\;\rho (x) \) and \(\{x\}\)
The Hardy–Littlewood–Flett function \( { {\mathfrak {f}} (x)}\) is related, in many ways, to the three functions \({\left\lfloor x \right\rfloor },\;\rho (x) \) and \(\{x\}\). The floor function \( {\left\lfloor x \right\rfloor } \) is related to the divisor function \(d(n)= 1\star 1 (n) \), the multiplicative square convolution product of the constant function 1, through the Dirichlet hyperbola method. More generally if g, h are two multiplicative functions and \(f=g\star h \). The Dirichlet hyperbola method is just the evaluation of a sum in two different ways:
If \(g=h\), then
As an application we have the estimate [28] (p. 262) for the divisor function \(d= 1\star 1\):
The importance of the functions \(\{x \}\) and \(\rho (x)\) lies in the integral representations of the Riemann zeta-function:
valid for \(-1<{{\text {Re}}}s< 0 \). Making the change of variable \(\displaystyle x= \frac{1}{u} \) and applying Mellin inversion formula gives
For later use, we give some details on the case considered by Davenport in (2.3). From (2.4) we obtain for \( -1<c<0\)
By the functional equation of the Riemann \(\zeta \)-function and the functional equation of the \(\Gamma \)-function we obtain for \( 0<a<1\)
Using the classical equivalent formulation of the Prime Number Theorem that \(\displaystyle \sum \nolimits _{n=1}^{\infty } \frac{\mu (n)}{n}= 0 \) we obtain Davenport’s relation
where the convergence is uniform by Davenport estimate (2.4). We will need two important properties of the function \(\{x \}\):
Kubert identity:
Franel formula:
Kubert identity and Franel’s formula are interesting features shared by many functions. Let \(B_r(x)\) be the Bernoulli polynomial defined by
so that
If \(r\ge 2\) is even then for \( 0\le x\le 1 \)
with absolute convergence of the series. The Hurwitz zeta function \(\zeta (s,x) \) is defined for \({{\text {Re}}}s>1 \) by
Then \(B_r(x)\) and \( \zeta (s,x)\) both satisfy the functional equation [21]
where \( f^{(k)}= k^{1-n}\) if \(f(x)= B_n(x)\) and \( f^{(k)}= k^{s}\) if \(f(x)= \zeta (s,x)\). Furthermore, if a, b denote arbitrary positive integers and \( (a, b)= \gcd (a, b), [a, b]= {{\,\mathrm{lcm}\,}}(a, b) \) the greatest common divisor and least common multiple respectively of a and b, then [21]:
and for \({{\text {Re}}}s> \frac{1}{2} \)
Similarly to (2.2) we have
and the function \(\displaystyle \zeta (s,w)- \frac{1}{(s-1)w^{s-1}}\) is analytic in \(\{{{\text {Re}}}s>0 \} \). In the next section we use two summation formulas.
If F is an antiderivative of f, then, formally [1]
and if \(\mu \) is the Möbius function and if \(0< \theta ,\,x \le 1 \) , we have, pointwise [2]
3 From Beurling’s Theorem to Hardy–Littlewood–Flett Function \({\mathfrak {f}} (x)\)
3.1 The Emergence of Franel Integral Type
To show that the constant function \(1 \in {\overline{ {\mathcal M}}}\) one has, as in [2], to minimize the norms in \(L^2([0,\,1]) \)
which brings back to the evaluation of integrals of Franel type, computed in [2]:
To show that the function \(\sin x \in {\overline{ {\mathcal M}}}\) one has, this time, to minimize the norms
Using (2.7) the minimization problem reduces to evaluation of the scalar products in \(\displaystyle L^2\left( 0,\,1 \right) \) giving the Fourier sine series of the function \( \{ \frac{\theta }{x}\} \), that is
and then to the evaluation of \(\displaystyle \int _0^1 \{\frac{a}{x}\} \{bx\}dx\), another kind of integrals of Franel type. We compute these integrals in the case \(a=m,\,b=n \), m and n being integers.
3.2 The Second Kind of Franel Type Integrals \(I_{n,m}=\int _0^1\{nx\}\{\frac{m}{x}\}dx,\;n,m\in {{\mathbb {N}}}^*\)
The values of the integrals \(I_{n,m}\) are given by the following
Theorem 3.1
For positive integers m, n, the modified Franel integrals are given by
Let us first give few examples:
We observe that in all these examples the factor \(\displaystyle \zeta (2)= \frac{\pi ^2}{6}\) is present.
For the proof we consider the two functions defined on \(]0,+\infty [\)
and their multiplicative convolution
We split the computations in several steps. A natural method is to use first the Mellin transform with its property \({\mathcal M}(f \star g) (s) = {\mathcal M}(f)(s){\mathcal M}(g) (s) \), followed by an inversion. The main idea is the decomposition formula (2.10), valid if \(\displaystyle \int \nolimits _0^1 \frac{\vert f(x)\vert }{x}\, dx\) is finite:
or in an generalized function form,
where \(\chi _B\) denotes the characteristic function of the set B.
3.2.1 Computations of Different Integrals
-
(1)
Computation of \( \displaystyle F(s) = M(f)(s)\) For \(\sigma = {{\text {Re}}}\,s >-2\) we have
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} F(s)&=\int _0^1\{nx\}x^sdx \\&=\sum _{0\le k\le n-1}\int _{\frac{k}{n}}^{\frac{k+1}{n}}(nx-k)x^sdx\\&=n\int _0^1x^{s+1}dx-\sum _{1\le k\le n-1}k\int _{\frac{k}{n}}^{\frac{k+1}{n}}x^sdx\\&=\frac{n}{s+2}-\frac{1}{(s+1)n^{s+1}} \sum _{1\le k\le n-1}k((k+1)^{s+1}-k^{s+1})\\&=\frac{n}{s+2}-\frac{1}{(s+1)n^{s+1}}\{n^{s+2}-(1+2^{s+1}+3^{s+1}+\cdots n^{s+1})\} \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$ -
(2)
Computation of \( \displaystyle G(s)=M(g)(s)\) For \(-2<\sigma = {{{\text {Re}}}}s<-1\) we have
$$\begin{aligned}\begin{aligned} G(s)&=\int _1^{+\infty } {\{x\}}^{s-1}dx\\&=\sum _{k\ge 1}\int _k^{k+1} (x-k)x^{s-1}dx \\&=\int _1^{+\infty }x^sdx-\sum _{k\ge 1}k\int _k^{k+1}x^{s-1}dx \\&=\int _1^{+\infty }x^sdx-\frac{1}{s}\sum _{k\ge 1}k((k+1)^s-k^s)\\&=\frac{1}{s+1}-\frac{\zeta (-s)}{s}\quad \sigma <-1\\ \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$Hence for \(-2< c<-1\) we can write
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} I_{n,m}&= \frac{1}{2i\pi }\int _{c-i\infty }^{c+i\infty }\left( \frac{1}{s+1}-\frac{\zeta (-s)}{s}\right) \left( \frac{n}{s+2}-\frac{1}{(s+1)n^{s+1}}(n^{s+1} \right. \\&\left. \quad -(1+2^{s+1}+3^{s+1}+\cdots (n-1)^{s+1})\right) \frac{ds}{m^s}. \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$and, by changing s to \(-s\), we get for \(1<c<2\)
$$\begin{aligned}\begin{aligned} I_{n,m}&= \frac{1}{2i\pi }\int _{c-i\infty }^{c+i\infty }\left( \frac{1}{1-s}+\frac{\zeta (s)}{s}\right) \left( \frac{n}{2-s}-\frac{1}{(1-s)n^{1-s}}(n^{1-s}\right. \\&\left. \quad -(1+2^{1-s}+3^{1-s}+\cdots (n-1)^{1-s})\right) \frac{ds}{m^{-s}}. \end{aligned}\end{aligned}$$By expanding we find:
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} I_{n,m}&=\frac{1}{2i\pi }\int _{c-i\infty }^{c+i\infty }\frac{n.m^s}{(1-s)(2-s)}ds\\&\quad -\frac{1}{2i\pi }\int _{c-i\infty }^{c+\infty }\frac{m^s}{(1-s)^2n^{1-s}}(n^{1-s}-(1+2^{1-s}+3^{1-s}+\cdots (n-1)^{1-s}))ds\\&\quad +\frac{1}{2i\pi }\int _{c-i\infty }^{c+i\infty }\frac{\zeta (s)}{s}(\frac{n}{2-s}-\frac{1}{(1-s)n^{1-s}}(n^{1-s}-(1+2^{1-s}+\cdots \\&\qquad +(n-1)^{1-s}))m^sds \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$We treat the last integral by expanding the \( \zeta \) function in Dirichlet series. We will treat each type of integrals appearing separately. Then we proceed to the necessary groupings in order to conclude.
In the following we write \(\displaystyle \int _{(c)} \) instead of \(\displaystyle \int _ {c-i \infty } ^ {c+ i \infty } \), with \( 1<c <2 \).
-
(3)
Computation of \( \displaystyle \frac{n}{2i\pi }\int _{(c)} \frac{m^s}{(1-s)(2-s)}ds\). We set \(\displaystyle f(x)=-\frac{1}{x}\) for \(0<x\le 1\) and \(f(x)= \displaystyle -\frac{1}{x^2}\) for \(x>1\). Its Mellin transform is \(\displaystyle \frac{1}{(1-s)(2-s)}\) for \(1<\sigma <2\). We obtain \(\displaystyle \frac{n}{m}\) for \(m\ge 1\).
-
(4)
Computation of \( \displaystyle -\frac{1}{2i\pi }\int _{(c)} \frac{m^s}{(1-s)^2}ds\). We take \(f(x)=\displaystyle \frac{\log x}{x}\) for \(0<x<1\) and 0 for \(x\ge 1\). Its Mellin transform is \(\displaystyle -\frac{1}{(s-1)^2}\) for \(\sigma >1\). Here we obtain \(m\log m\) for \(m\ge 1\).
-
(5)
Computation of \( \displaystyle \frac{k}{n}\int _{(c)} \frac{(m\, n)^s ds}{(1-s)^2\,k^s}\). As before we find \(\displaystyle m\log (\frac{m\,n}{k})\) if \(mn\ge k\) and 0 if \(mn<k\).
-
(6)
Computation of \( \displaystyle \frac{n}{2i\pi }\int _{(c)}\frac{m^sds}{s(2-s)j^s},\;j\ge 1\). We take \(\displaystyle f(x)= -\frac{1}{2} \) for \(0<x\le 1\) and \(\displaystyle f(x)= -\frac{1}{2x^2}\) for \(x>1\). We get \(\displaystyle -\frac{n}{2}\) if \(j\le m\) and \(\displaystyle -\frac{nm^2}{2j^2} \) if \(j>m\).
-
(7)
Computation of \( \displaystyle -\frac{1}{2i\pi }\int _{(c)}\frac{m^sds}{s(1-s)j^s}, \;j\ge 1\). Here we take \(\displaystyle f(x)=1-\frac{1}{x}\) if \(0<x\le 1\) and 0 for \(x>1\). We obtain \(\displaystyle 1-\frac{m}{j}\) if \(m\ge j\) and 0 otherwise.
-
(8)
Computation of \( \displaystyle \frac{k}{n}\frac{1}{2i\pi }\int \nolimits _{c)}\frac{(nm)^s}{s(1-s)(jk)^s}\). Here we obtain \(\displaystyle 1-\frac{nm}{jk}\) if \(mn\ge jk\) and 0 otherwise.
By putting together these partial results we end the proof of Theorem (3.1).
3.3 Second Approach \( \left\{ \frac{ \theta }{x}\right\} \)
The most interesting approach for the evaluation of the integral \(\displaystyle \int _0^1 \left\{ \frac{ \theta }{t} \right\} \sin (n \pi t) dt \) is to use (2.10):
Moreover
Hence the n-th Fourier coefficient
is also
Seeking for the coefficient corresponding to \( f(x) = \sum _{1 \le \nu \le N} c_\nu \{ \frac{ \theta _\nu }{x} \}\) the first integral does not matter since \(\sum _{1 \le \nu \le N} c_\nu \theta _\nu =0\). It remains to compute
A depends on n and \(\theta \). We first consider the finite sum
and set \(x= n\pi \theta \). We have by a partial summation
Hence
We thus obtain one of our main results: the n-th Fourier coefficient \(a_n\) of the fundamental function \(\{\frac{\theta }{\bullet } \} \) is related to the value at n of the antiderivative of the function \(\displaystyle {\mathfrak {f}} (x)\) given in (1.1)
bearing in mind that the derivative of \(\displaystyle \sum \nolimits _{k=1}^{\infty } \sin ^2 \frac{u}{k}\) is \( {{\mathfrak {f}} }(2u) \).
To give some useful integral representations we adapt an interesting method, due to Delange [13], and use a result of Saffari and Vaughan [24]. First we introduce for \( 0<\alpha \le 1\)
Furthermore for \(x>0,\,y>1\) let
According to [24] we have
Lemma 3.1
We have the estimate
the O is uniform in u.
If f is continuously differentiable function on [0, 1]
Hence
since
From the Lemma (3.1) we get, since \(f'\) is bounded on (0, 1)
A natural example is to consider a Dirichlet character modulo \(N,\, \chi \). In this case
We shall not try to give sufficient conditions to justify the process here. The main interest of the remark is that it suggests a method of dealing with various other sums than \({{\mathfrak {f}}}(x)\).
4 Almost Periodicity
The goal of this section is to show, by elementary methods, that the Hardy–Littelwood–Flett function \(\displaystyle {{\mathfrak {f}}}(x) = \displaystyle \sum \nolimits _{n=1}^{\infty } \frac{1}{n} \sin \frac{x}{n} \) is not bounded on the real line. First we recall two fundamental results on Bohr-almost periodic functions [8] (p.39, 44, and 58).
Theorem 4.1
(The Mean value theorem) For every almost periodic function f(x), there exists a mean value
and
uniformly with respect to a. In particular if f is an odd almost periodic function, then its mean \(M\{f(x)\}\) is zero.
Theorem 4.2
(The antiderivative theorem) The integral \( \displaystyle F(x)= \int \nolimits _0^x f(t) dt\) of an almost-periodic function f(x) is almost-periodic if and only if it is bounded.
Let
The series defining \( {\mathfrak {F}}(x)\) is uniformly convergent on the real line. The partial sums
are almost periodic [8] (Corollary, p.38), and then \( {\mathfrak {F}}(x)\) is also almost periodic [8] (Theorem IV, p.38). It is interesting to note that \({\mathfrak {F}}_n\) is periodic of period \(p_n= \displaystyle {{\,\mathrm{lcm}\,}}(1,2,\cdots ,n)= e^{\psi (n)} \), with \(\psi (x)\) is the Chebyshev function, given by \(\displaystyle \psi (x)= \sum \nolimits _{p\le x} \Lambda (p) \), where \(\Lambda (n)\) is the Mangoldt function.
The prime number theorem asserts that \(\displaystyle p_n= e^{n(1+o(1))} \) as \(n \rightarrow \infty \) [26] (p.261). Actually \(\displaystyle p_n\le 3^n\).
Lemma 4.1
We have
Let \(x>0\) and \(\displaystyle n_x= {\left\lfloor \frac{2x}{\pi } \right\rfloor } \). The function \(\displaystyle h: x\rightarrow \sin ^2 \frac{1}{x}\), being bounded on \([0, \frac{\pi }{2}] \) and continuous on each \(\displaystyle [\alpha , \frac{\pi }{2} ] \), is Riemann-integrable on \([0, \frac{\pi }{2}] \), so by considering Riemann sums
For \(x>0\) the function of \(g(t)= \sin ^2 \frac{x}{t}\) is decreasing on \(\displaystyle (\frac{2x}{\pi },\; +\infty )\) and thus
Since \( \displaystyle \int _{\frac{2x}{\pi }}^{\infty } \sin ^2 \frac{x}{t}\,dt= x\int _0^{\frac{\pi }{2} } \frac{ \sin ^2 u}{u^2}\,du \) we deduce the lemma from (4.8) (4.9) and the relations
Corollary 4.1
The function \(\displaystyle {{\mathfrak {f}}}(x) = \displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty } \frac{1}{n} \sin \frac{x}{n} \) is not bounded on the real line.
Proof
Assume that \(\displaystyle {{\mathfrak {f}}}(x) \) is bounded on \({{\mathbb {R}}}\) then it would be almost periodic by the antiderivative theorem (4.2) and the remark that \( \displaystyle {{\mathfrak {f}}'}(x)= \displaystyle {{\mathfrak {F}}}(x) \). Since \(\displaystyle {{\mathfrak {f}}}(x) \) is odd its mean is zero. This is in contradiction with the limit \(\displaystyle \frac{\pi }{2} \) given by the Lemma (4.1). \(\square \)
Remark 4.1
The same analysis applies to the series \(\displaystyle \sum \nolimits _{n=1}^{\infty } \frac{\chi (n)}{n} \sin (\frac{x}{n}),\,\chi \) being a Dirichlet character modulo N.
We will need to consider some Bessel functions. We recall that for \( {{\text {Re}}}s>0\) the \(\Gamma \)-function is
By Fubini’s theorem
where
More generally the iterated integrals [30, 31]
satisfy the differential equation of Bessel type:
The ordinary Bessel function of order \(\nu \) is
The K-Bessel function of order \(\nu \), for \(\nu \) not an integer, is
When \(\nu \) is an integer we take the limiting value. It could be also defined by
The Mellin transform of the \(J_0\)-Bessel function is:
We will need two Mellin transforms, due essentially to Voronoi
4.1 Summations Formulas and Beyond
Various classical summation formulas, as Poisson summation formula, Voronoi summation formula or Hardy–Ramanujan summation formula can all be given a unified formulation. The following Generalized Poisson summation formula is proved in [9]
Theorem 4.3
Let \(a= a(n)\) be an arithmetic function with moderate growth. We define the Dirichlet series
and we suppose that L(a, s) has an analytic continuation to \({\mathbb {C}}\) with only a possible pole at \(s = 1\). We suppose also that there are positive constants \(A, a_1,\ldots ,a_g \) such that with the \(\Gamma \)-factors
L(a, s) satisfies the functional equation
Furthermore for \(f\in {\mathcal S}({\mathbb {R}})\), the Schwartz space, we define a very special Hankel’s transform:
Then,
where \(\displaystyle \mathrm{Res}_{s=1} \) is the evaluation of the residue at \(s=1\).
4.2 2 Classical Choices
-
(1)
For \( a(n)= 1\) we have \(L(a,s)= \zeta (s)\) and
$$\begin{aligned} \gamma (s)= \pi ^{-\frac{s}{2}} \Gamma (\frac{s}{2}),\quad K(x)= 2\cos (2\pi x). \end{aligned}$$We recover Poisson summation formula for even functions in \(f(x)\in {\mathcal S}({{\mathbb {R}}})\):
$$\begin{aligned} \sum _{n=1}^{\infty } f(n)= -\frac{1}{2}f(0)+ \int _0^{\infty } f(x) dx +2 \sum _{n=1}^{\infty } \int _0^{\infty } f(y) \cos (2\pi ny) dy. \end{aligned}$$(4.4) -
(2)
If \(a(n)= d(n)\) we have \( L(d, s)= \zeta ^2(s)\) and
$$\begin{aligned} \gamma (s)= \pi ^{-s} \Gamma (\frac{s}{2})^2,\quad \frac{\gamma (s)}{\gamma (1-s)}= (2\pi )^{-2s} (2+2\cos \pi s) \Gamma (s)^2 \end{aligned}$$and
$$\begin{aligned} K(x)= 4 K_0(4\pi \sqrt{x})- 4 Y_0(4\pi \sqrt{x}). \end{aligned}$$
We recover Voronoi summation formula
As a consequence we have Koshliakov’s formula valid for \(a>0\):
This formula was proved by Ramanujan about ten years earlier (He did not appeal to Voronoi’s formula) and by many authors later.
4.3 Another Function of Hardy and Littlewood
Hardy and Littlewood gave in [16] (p.269) the following relation
where \({{\text {Re}}}z>0 , \gamma \) is Euler’s constant.
For \(\vert z \vert < 1\):
An immediate consequence of this expansion is obtained by taking real and imaginary parts with \(z= ix, x\in {{\mathbb {R}}}, \vert x\vert <1\):
More generally we define the series
which has a Mellin-Barnes type integral representation when \(x>0, c\) is fixed with \({{\text {Re}}}\nu +1<c< {{\text {Re}}}\nu +2 \):
The proof of the main equality results from the deformation of the path of integration and the fact that the pair
is a pair of Mellin transforms [18, 19].
The series (4.6) has many remarkable properties. It may be differentiated term by term to get \( {{\mathfrak {G}}}(-x) \) where \( {{\mathfrak {G}}}(x)\) is the function defined in [26] (p.243):
The following formula is mentioned in [27]
4.4 Laplace Transform of \(a \sqrt{t} J_1(a\sqrt{t}),\; a>0,\; t>0\), Another Approach to Segal’s Formula
In [25] (formula (12)) Segal proves the following result
Theorem 4.4
If \(\displaystyle g(z):= \sum _{k \ge 1} (1- \cos \frac{z}{k})\) then
This formula is interesting compared to (4.5), as we have for real \(z,\, g(z)= {{\text {Re}}}{{\mathfrak {F}}}(iz) \). The proof given in [25] uses a rather elaborated tools such the three Bessel functions \(J_1, J_2, J_3\), the functional equation of the Riemann \(\zeta \)-function etc. We give here a proof which we think is simpler.
Let
In the Laplace transform
we set \(u^2=t\) and obtain
According to [33] (page 394, formula(4)) we have for with \(\vert {{\text {Arg}}}\; p \vert < \frac{\pi }{4} \)
Replacing p by \(\sqrt{p}\) with \(\vert {{\text {Arg}}}\, p \vert < \frac{\pi }{2}\) and taking \(\nu = 1 \) we obtain
Hence
Note that \(a \sqrt{t} J_1(a\sqrt{t}) \) is not in \(L^2([0,+ \infty [)\) since its Laplace transform is not bounded in the \(L^2\)-norm on the lines \({{\text {Re}}}p= c\). With \(a=2 \sqrt{2k\pi } \) we get
As we have
and, by continuity, the Laplace transform of the sum in
is
which converges in \({{\text {Re}}}p>0\), the Laplace transform of \(g_1(t)\) is
On the other hand
and
The equality \(\displaystyle {\mathcal L}(g) (p)= {\mathcal L}(g_1) (p) \) is obtained by using the well known partial fractions decomposition
where we have to set \(\displaystyle z= \frac{2\pi }{ p}\). Hence \(g=g_1\) by injectivity of Laplace Transform.
4.5 Some Mellin Transforms and the Cube of Theta Functions
It has been noticed in [15] (p.14) that the function
is very similar to \(\zeta (1+it)\) in its asymptotic behaviour as \(t\rightarrow +\infty \). This could suggest a link between this function and the theta series \(\displaystyle \vartheta _3(q)= \sum \nolimits _{n\in {{\mathbb {Z}}}}q^{n^2}\). In this section, following a suggestion of Crandall [10], we would like to briefly show by considering Mellin transforms an unexpected link to the third power of the (fourth) Jacobi theta function \(\displaystyle \vartheta _4(q)= \sum \nolimits _{n\in {{\mathbb {Z}}}} (-1)^n q^{n^2},\; \vert q\vert <1\). We define
These two functions are defined for \(s\in {{\mathbb {C}}}\) and \({{\text {Re}}}s>1 \) for \( {{\tilde{\chi }}}(s, t)\), \({{\text {Re}}}s >0 \) for \( \chi (s, t)\). They are related by
We have
where
is the Dirichlet \(\eta \)-function. Furthermore
and for \( \chi (s, t)\) we have a more interesting result
We have the following lemma due to Andrews [3] (p.124)
Lemma 4.2
For \( \vert q\vert <1\)
where \(r_3(n)\) is the number of representations of n as sum of three squares. According to a result of Fermat an integer is a sum of three squares if and only if it is not of form \(4^n(8m+7) \). There are some gaps in the expansion in power series of the left hand side of (4.11). Similarly to (4.10) we have
A link between (4.10) and (4.12) is given by Crandall [10] (p.372) as a relation between two Epstein zeta functions associated with the two not equivalent ternary forms
in the form
Next we establish a functional equation
Theorem 4.5
For \(t>0\) the function \(\displaystyle \chi (\frac{1}{2}, t)\) satisfies the following functional equation
with \(\gamma = 1-i \) and \({\mathcal {O}}\) is the set of odd integers.
We could also seek for a result similar to (4.14) for
The relevance of this function lies in its relation to a Hardy–Littlewood–Flett like function:
In order to prove (4.14) we consider, for a fixed \(t>0\), the function
extended to the origin by \(f(0)= 0 \) and to \({{\mathbb {R}}}\) as an even function. The obtained function is \(\mathcal C^{\infty }\) on the real line to which we apply the Poisson summation formula (4.4) to obtain
Remark 4.2
The function \(\displaystyle y \mapsto \frac{ e^{\frac{-t}{y}}}{{\sqrt{y}} }\) is continuous on \([0, \infty [ \) and decreases to 0 at infinity, hence the proper integrals \(\displaystyle \int _0^{\infty } f(y) \cos (2\pi ny) dy, n\ge 0\) are convergent.
We compute \({\mathcal F}(f)(n)\) as follows
We recall the modified Bessel function (4.3), written in the form
that we use in the form
Actually for (4.17) we need only the simplest case of
The first integral in the left hand side of (4.17), with
is equal to
The second integral with
is equal to
By using (4.19) we see that (4.17) is the sum of
and
As in [10] we denote by \(\gamma = 1-i, \,d= \pm 2n+1, \, n\in {{\mathbb {N}}}^{\star }\) with \(\sqrt{-\vert d\vert } =i \sqrt{\vert d\vert } \). Then d describes \(\mathcal O{\setminus }\{1\}\) and
Hence
For the remaining term in (4.16) we use (4.20), with \(n= 0\), to obtain
which together with (4.22) gives finally (4.14):
In close analogy to Jacobi’s transformation of Theta functions (4.14) appears as a convergence acceleration of a slowly convergent series.
Incidentally \(\displaystyle \chi (\frac{1}{2}; \frac{t^2}{4}) \) is a Fourier transform of a function of the Schwartz class. Indeed let \(\displaystyle g(x)= \frac{1}{1+e^{x^2}}\), the reciprocity formulas are
with
Remark 4.3
The convolution of three functions \(f, g, h\in {\mathcal S}({{\mathbb {R}}})\) is, as well known,
With \(\displaystyle f(x)= g(x)= h(x)= \frac{1}{1+e^{x^2}}\) we have
so that for the Fourier transform
or
Evaluating at \(x= 0\) we obtain
From (4.10), with \(s=\frac{1}{2}\), we have (Compare with [10])
We end this study by using an interesting integral representation due to Mellin [20] (p. 22, 23):
In the case of \(q=2\) we obtain at once, as in (4.23)
where
This representation of the Epstein zeta function of the ternary form \(q_2(u,v,w)= uv+vw+wu \) in terms of the Dirichlet \(\eta \)-function and similar other representations can shed some light on their analytic continuation.
References
Alcantara-Bode, J.: An integral equation formulation of the Riemann Hypothesis. Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory 17(2), 151–168 (1993)
Alcantara-Bode, J.: Some properties of the Beurling function. Pro-Mathematica, XIV, No. 27–28, 1–11 (2000)
Andrew, G.E.: The fifth and seventh order mock theta functions. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 293(1), 113–134 (1986)
Báez-Duarte, L.: A strengthening of the Nyman–Beurling criterion for the Riemann hypothesis. Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Natur. Rend. Lincei (9) Mat. Appl. 14(1), 5–11 (2003)
Balazard, M., Saias, E.: Notes sur la fonction \(\zeta \) de Riemann, 1. Adv. Math. 139, 310–321 (1998)
Balazard, M., Saias, E.: Notes sur la fonction \(\zeta \) de Riemann, 4. Adv. Math. 188, 69–86 (2004)
Beurling, A.: A closure problem related to the Riemann zeta-function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 41, 312–314 (1955)
Bohr, H.: Almost Periodic Functions. Julius Springer, Berlin (1933) (Chelsea Publishing Company, N.Y., 1947)
Cohen, H.: Number theory, volume II: Analytic and modern tools, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 240, Springer, (2007)
Crandall, R.E.: New representations for the Madelung constant. Exp. Math. 8, 367–379 (1999)
Davenport, H.: On some infinite series involving arithmetical functions. Q. J. Math 2(8), 8–13 (1937)
Davenport, H.: On some infinite series involving arithmetical functions (II). Q. J. Math.(2) 8, 313–320 (1937)
Delange, H.: Sur la fonction \(\displaystyle f(x)= \sum 1/n \sin (x/n)\). Théorie analytique et élémentaire des nombres, Caen, 29-30, Septembre 1980, Journées mathématiques SMF-CNRS, (1980)
Donoghue, W.F.: Distributions and Fourier Transforms. Academic, N.Y. (1969)
Flett, T.M.: On the function \(\displaystyle \sum (1/n) \sin (t/n)\). J. Lond. Math. Soc. 25, 5–9 (1950)
Hardy, G.H., Littlewood, J.E.: Notes on the theory of series (XX): on Lambert series. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 2(41), 257–270 (1936)
Hartman, P.: On a class of arithmetical Fourier series. Am. J. Math. 60, 66–74 (1938)
Katsurada, M.: On Mellin-Barnes Type of Integrals and Sums associated With the Riemann Zeta function. Publ. Inst. Math.(Beograd) (Nouvelle Ser.) 62 (76), 13-25 (1997)
Katsurada, M.: Power series with the Riemann zeta-function in the coefficients. Proc. Japan Acad. 72, 61–63 (1996)
Mellin, H.: Eine Formel fur den Logarithmus transcendenter Funktionen von endlichen Geschlecht. Acta Sot. Sci. Fennicae 29, 3–49 (1900)
Mordell, L.J.: Integral formulae of arithmetical character. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 33, 371–375 (1958)
Nikolski, N.: Distance formulae and invariant subspaces, with an application to localization of zeros of the Riemann \(\zeta \)-function. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 45(1), 143–159 (1995)
Nikolski, N.: Hardy Spaces (Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2019)
Safari, B., Vaughan, R.C.: On the fractional parts of \(\displaystyle \frac{x}{n} \) and related sequences II. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 27(2), 1–30 (1977)
Segal, S.L.: On \(\displaystyle f(x)= \sum 1/n \sin (x/n)\), J. London Math. Soc., (2)4, 385-393(1972)
Tenenbaum, G.: Introduction to analytic and probabilistic number theory, volume 163, Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, third edition, 2015. Translated from the 2008 French edition by Patrick D. F. Ion
Tennenbaum, J.: On the function \(\displaystyle \sum _{n=0}^{\infty }\frac{\zeta (n+2)}{n!}x^n \). Math. Scand. 41, 242–248 (1977)
Titchmarsh, E.C.: The Theory of the Riemann Zeta-Function. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1951)
Vasyunin, V.I.: On a biorthogonal system related with the Riemann hypothesis. St. Petersburg Math. J. 7, 405–419 (1996)
Voronoi, G.: Sur une fonction transcendante et ses applications à la sommation de quelques séries. Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, troisième série 21, 207–267 (1904)
Voronoi, G.: Sur une fonction transcendante et ses applications à la sommation de quelques séries, seconde partie. Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, troisième série 21, 459–533 (1904)
Walfisz, A.: Teilerprobleme. Math. Z. 26, 66–88 (1927)
Watson, G.N.: A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1922)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Irene Sabadini.
To the memory of our friend Carlos Berenstein.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the topical collection “In memory of Carlos A. Berenstein (1944–2019)” edited by Irene Sabadini and Daniele Struppa.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sebbar, A., Gay, R. Arithmetic and Analysis of the Series \({ \sum _{n=1}^{\infty } \frac{1}{n} \sin \frac{x}{n} }\). Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 15, 55 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11785-021-01097-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11785-021-01097-4