Introduction

Nanostructured materials are produced using various techniques, each offering unique advantages for tailoring material properties compared to bulk materials with identical elemental compositions.1,2,3 The sol–gel method is another technique used for producing nanomaterials, involving the conversion of a solution (sol) into a gel-like material (gel) and then into a solid nanomaterial through chemical reactions.4 Chemical precipitation is a technique where nanomaterials are synthesized by precipitating them from a solution of precursor chemicals. The size and properties of the nanoparticles can be controlled by adjusting parameters such as temperature, pH, and concentration of reactants.5 Electrospinning is employed to produce nanofibers by applying a high voltage to a polymer solution or melt, which then gets drawn into a fine fiber. This technique is suitable for producing nanofibers of various polymers and composite materials.6,7

Mechanical alloying (MA) is an effective technique for producing nanomaterials, offering advantages such as uniform element dispersion at the nanoscale, production of metastable phases, and improved material properties like strength, hardness, and magnetic characteristics.8,9 The process involves repeated welding and fracturing of powder particles in a high-energy ball mill. Key parameters such as milling time, milling media, rotation speed, and ball-to-powder ratio significantly impact the final properties. MA has been extensively used to create Fe-based alloy nanocomposites with enhanced magnetic properties, allowing for precise tailoring of these properties through careful control of the milling parameters.10,11,12,13,14,15

Nanostructured FeSi is chosen for its high saturation magnetization, low coercivity, and superior soft magnetic behavior, making it suitable for applications in magnetic sensors, transformers, and electric motors.16,17,18,19,20,21,22 Nanostructuring further enhances these properties, increasing FeSi’s appeal for advanced technological uses. MA is crucial in producing FeSi nanostructured powders with tailored characteristics, aiding in the development of magnetic and electronic devices.23,24,25 Silicon’s higher hardness and brittleness compared to iron lead to particle fracturing and the formation of lamellar structures, improving electrical resistivity and reducing eddy current losses. However, FeSi alloys with over 6.5 wt.% silicon become brittle, complicating conventional production methods.26,27

The purpose of this study is to synthesize nanostructured Fe90Si10 alloys with varying milling durations and investigate their magnetic properties. The primary objective is to assess how changes in milling time impact the structural properties and magnetic behavior of the alloy during MA. Advanced characterization techniques, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS), vibrating-sample magnetometry (VSM), and x-ray diffraction (XRD), will be utilized to analyze the morphological, structural, and magnetic characteristics of the FeSi samples. By examining the relationship between milling duration, crystal structure, and magnetic properties, this research seeks to deepen our understanding of how nanostructuring affects the performance of Fe90Si10 alloys. Ultimately, the study aims to provide insights for the development of Fe90Si10 alloys with improved magnetic properties, which could be highly beneficial for applications in magnetic devices and related fields.

Experimental Procedures

For this study, both Fe and Si powders with an average particle size of approximately 70 μm and a purity level of 99.5% were used as the initial materials. These powders were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). The milling process was conducted using a high-energy planetary ball mill (PM 400) operating at a speed of 400 rpm, with a ball-to-powder weight ratio of 1:20. Each sample had an initial powder mixture mass of 20 g. The powders were placed in a 250-ml-capacity tungsten carbide cylindrical flask along with tungsten carbide balls with diameters of 20 mm, and milling took place under an inert atmosphere. The duration of the milling process varied from 0 to 30 h (0, 15, 30) to systematically investigate its influence on the structural and magnetic properties of the resulting FeSi alloy powders. To mitigate excessive heating during milling, a 15-min milling sequence was followed by a 15-min resting period.

The morphological and structural characteristics of the resultant alloy mixtures were meticulously analyzed using a Zeiss GeminiSEM scanning electron microscope equipped with EDS and a Panalytical X’Pert Pro x-ray diffractometer employing Cu Kα radiation, respectively. Furthermore, the magnetic behavior was systematically assessed utilizing a MicroSense vibrating sample magnetometer with a maximum applied field of 15 kOe. This comprehensive approach provides a thorough exploration of the milling-induced alterations in both the microstructure and magnetic properties of the FeSi alloy powders.

Results and Discussion

Structural Analysis

In Fig. 1, XRD diagrams depict the evolution of FeSi alloy powders over varying milling durations. Initially (0 h), the XRD pattern reveals distinctive Fe and Si peaks within the mixed powders. However, after 15 h of milling, the Si peaks disappear from the XRD pattern, indicating the incorporation of Si particles into the Fe lattice and resulting in the formation of the Fe(Si) solid solution. This observation concurs with the findings of Rodriguez et al.28 who reported that XRD profiles of Fe−10% Si and Fe−20% Si samples ground for 10 h exhibited characteristic body-centered cubic (bcc) structure peaks indicative of Fe(Si) phases. After 30 h of milling, the Fe(Si) peaks reveal heightened broadening compared to the 15-h samples, coupled with a reduction in their intensities. Contrary to expectations based on conventional interpretations, as illustrated in Fig. 1, the broadening of the diffraction peaks does not appear significant even after an extended milling duration. This intriguing observation prompts an inquiry into the authors’ rationale for the unexpected increase in peak intensity after 15 h of milling compared to the unmilled powders. In seeking a comprehensive understanding, it becomes imperative to explore the authors’ proposed explanations for this unique phenomenon, considering potential factors such as changes in crystallite structure, grain boundaries, or other dynamic effects induced by the mechanical milling process.

Fig. 1
figure 1

XRD patterns of Fe90Si10 (wt.%) powders milled for different durations.

The various structural parameters of the unmilled powder are summarized in Table I, calculated using the Scherrer formula.29

Table I Structural parameters of unmilled FeSi powder using the Scherrer formula
$$D=\frac{0.9 \lambda }{\beta \text{cos}\theta }$$
(1)
$$\varepsilon =\frac{\beta }{4 tan \theta }$$
(2)

The above equation was derived using the following variables: λ = 1.54059 Å (Cu radiation), β (full width at half-maximum), θ (angle in radians), and ε (lattice strain).

The changes in crystallite size, lattice strain, and lattice parameters of milled Fe90Si10 alloy powders at different milling times are presented in Table II, determined using the Williamson–Hall (W–H) formula.30

Table II Variation in structural parameters of Fe90Si10 during mechanical milling by the Williamson–Hall (W–H) formula
$$\beta\; Cos \theta =\frac{0.89 \lambda }{D}+4\; \varepsilon Sin \theta $$
(3)

In this context, λ, β, θ, ε, and D represent the wavelength of Cu Kα radiation, full width at half-maximum (FWHM), Bragg angle, lattice strain, and average crystallite size, respectively.

Notably, milling time exerts a discernible influence on crystallite size and lattice parameters. As the milling time increases, a reduction in crystallite size, down to a remarkable 21.51 ± 0.03 nm, and an increase in lattice strains, reaching 0.236 ± 0.006%, become evident. These transformations are attributed to the rigorous mechanical deformation during the MA process induced by ball milling, leading to the downsizing of crystallite dimensions into the nanoscale regime.31 Concomitantly, an escalation in lattice deformations is noted with prolonged milling time. These effects align with the mechanism postulated by Fecht et al.,31 which identifies three distinct stages during MA. Firstly, deformation is localized within shear bands. Secondly, small-angle grain boundaries emerge, delineating individual grains. Finally, large-angle boundaries manifest, characterized by a fully random orientation of sizeable grains.

Table II outlines the evolution of the lattice parameter during the milling process. The initial lattice parameter, measured before milling, was 0.2861 nm. After 15 h of milling, a steady increase is observed, reaching 0.4511 nm. Following 30 h of milling, a further increase is noted, with the lattice parameter reaching 0.4528 nm. This expansion is attributed to the order–disorder transition induced by mechanical milling.

The increasing intensity of the (110) peak, as shown in Fig. 1, during the milling process indicates the diffusion of Si atoms within the Fe lattice, promoting the formation of a solid solution of Fe(Si).32 These changes in the lattice parameter emphasize the structural transformations at the atomic level, highlighting the influence of mechanical milling on the order and arrangement of atoms within the material.

By comparing the experimental results of lattice parameters of FeSi solid solution with Vegard’s law,33

$${a}_{\text{alloy}}={xa}_{A}+\left(1-x\right){a}_{B}$$
(4)

In this context, aA, aB, and aalloy represent the lattice parameters of pure A, pure B, and the alloy AxB(1−x), respectively, where x is the fraction of one component in the alloy.

The lattice parameters of the FeSi solid solution, calculated using Eq. 4, are depicted in Fig. 2. The segregation profile of silicon is notably influenced by the cooling rate. Within the iron lattice, silicon occupies sites, augmenting strength through solid solution reinforcement, thereby impeding dislocation sliding. Extensive research has explored the impact of varying silicon concentrations on the deformation behavior of ferrite single crystals, leading to a natural decrease in deformability.34 Deviation from Vegard’s law is a common observation across diverse material classes, including oxides, ionic salts, and intermetallic compounds. Such deviations often arise from structural phenomena, such as incomplete randomness in site occupancies, distortions like long-range ordering or clustering,35 or variations in bond distances, indicating alterations in the material’s electron configuration.36,37 Vegard’s law assumes a linear relationship between the lattice parameter and the composition of a solid solution. However, the experimental results for the Fe90Si10 nanostructured alloy deviate from Vegard’s law. This deviation can be attributed to the following factors:

  • Failure to satisfy the Hume–Rothery rules, which describe the conditions for obtaining a perfect solid solution. Specifically, in our case:

  • The constituent elements have different crystal structures.

  • There are significant differences in the atomic sizes of Fe (iron) and Si (silicon).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Variation of the lattice parameters of the FeSi solid solution, obtained using Vegard law.

Additionally, we observed bowing parameters due to an increase in repulsive forces between the atoms in the alloy. This indicates that the interactions between Fe and Si atoms do not follow the linear behavior predicted by Vegard’s law, leading to deviations in the expected lattice parameters.

Morphological Analysis

Figure 3 presents SEM micrographs illustrating nanostructured FeSi samples exposed to varying milling durations, demonstrating a noticeable reduction in mean particle size with increased processing time. The particle size, analyzed for Fig. 3a, b, and c using ImageJ software, decreased from 70 μm for unmilled powder to about 22 μm after 15 h of milling, further reducing to about 10 μm after 30 h of milling. Mechanical deformation occurs in the powder particles during milling, involving cycles of cold welding, fracturing, and subsequent re-welding.38 This dynamic evolution, evident in the micrographs, emphasizes the influence of milling duration on the nanostructure of the FeSi samples. The morphological evolution of the Fe90Si10 alloy powder during mechanical alloying is shown in Fig. 3, revealing different morphologies at various milling stages. Initially, the Fe90Si10 mixture powder consisted of coarse particles with a mean size of 70 μm. After 15 h of milling (Fig. 3b), the mean particle size was reduced to 22 μm with irregular and isotropic shapes due to intensive fracture and cold welding. However, severe fracturing and agglomeration were observed in many studies due to the chaotic nature of mechanical alloying.11,39 After 30 h of milling, the dominant morphology was platelet-shaped, with some round particles measuring about 10 μm in diameter (Fig. 3c). Some particles exhibited a layered structure of superposed Si and Fe layers, indicating ongoing mechanical alloying progress and particle size refinement. These results align with observations in mechanical alloying of ductile or brittle elements by other researchers.40,41

Fig. 3
figure 3

SEM micrographs and EDS analyses of Fe90Si10 powder mixtures at different milling durations: (a) SEM micrograph at 0 h, (b) SEM micrograph at 15 h, (c) SEM micrograph at 30 h, (d) EDS analysis at 0 h, (e) EDS analysis at 15 h, and (f) EDS analysis at 30 h

In Fig. 3d, e, and f, we present the EDS analysis results for the nanostructured Fe90Si10 alloy. These findings closely mirror the initial elemental composition of the Fe90Si10 powder mixture. The EDS spectrum of the unmilled mixture in Fig. 3d shows iron and silicon compositions of 94.4 wt.% and 5.6 wt.%, respectively. After 15 h of milling, as shown in Fig. 3e, the EDS spectrum of the FeSi mixture reveals iron and silicon compositions of 92 wt.% and 8 wt.%, respectively. However, after 30 h of milling, displayed in Fig. 3f, the EDS results show iron and silicon composition of 90.52 wt.% and 9.48 wt.%, respectively.

This indicates a change in the stoichiometry of the FeSi mixture during grinding, progressing from an unmilled mixture of 90 wt.% pure iron and 10 wt.% pure silicon to the formation of the Fe90Si10 alloy with complete diffusion of Si atoms into the iron. Notably, the EDS spectra exhibit only peaks corresponding to the elements present in the powders, indicating the alloy’s uniformity and the absence of impurities or contamination introduced during grinding, including potential influences from the surrounding atmosphere, grinding balls, and internal jar walls. The agreement between the EDS and XRD results, coupled with the absence of extraneous peaks, enhances confidence in the reliability and purity of the nanostructured Fe90Si10 alloy obtained through milling.42,43

Figure 4 illustrates the EDS mapping of FeSi alloys before and after the milling process. The unmilled samples, as depicted in Fig. 4a, reveal a non-homogeneous distribution of the elements Fe and Si, as highlighted by the mapping analysis. This non-homogeneous distribution is likely due to a 1-h milling period without milling balls, which could have resulted in uneven mixing of the elements.

Fig. 4
figure 4

(a) EDS elemental distribution maps of FeSi alloys prior to milling. (b) EDS elemental distribution maps of nanostructured FeSi milled for 30 h.

Upon increasing the milling time to 30 h, as shown in Fig. 4b, the EDS maps demonstrate a striking change. The distribution of Fe and Si becomes nearly identical, falling within the error limit of this analytical method. This result strongly suggests that the two elements have undergone extensive alloying, leading to the formation of the FeSi solid solution. This observation is consistent with the findings from x-ray diffraction analysis, which further confirms the successful formation of the FeSi solid solution in the milled samples.44

Magnetic Properties

Prior to VSM analysis, it is critical to demagnetize all samples to eliminate remanence by gradually applying a reverse magnetic field. The most effective demagnetization method is the electrical method using alternating current (AC), which generates heat in the material, causing the atoms within the magnet to vibrate more vigorously. This increased vibration disrupts the alignment of the magnet’s domains, effectively demagnetizing the sample. Figure 5 displays the demagnetization curve of nanostructured FeSi milled at various durations. Additionally, DC-demagnetization (DCD), also known as reverse remanence, depicts the remanent field as a function of the previously applied field. The DCD measurement procedure involves saturating the sample in the maximum negative field, followed by the application and removal of a small positive field to measure and plot the magnetization (at zero field) against the previously applied positive field. This process is repeated with progressively larger positive fields until the resulting remanent magnetization is constant and equal to the remanence after saturation.45,46,47

Fig. 5
figure 5

Intrinsic demagnetization curve of the nanostructured FeSi alloy.

Magnetization–hysteresis (M–H) loops at room temperature were measured for samples milled for various durations using a vibrating sample magnetometer. Figure 6 illustrates the M–H loops of the Fe90Si10 powders milled for different time periods, with the inset providing an expanded view of the curves near the origin. The hysteresis loops shown in Fig. 6 are characteristic of soft magnetic materials. The saturation magnetization (Ms) at an applied field of 15 kOe exhibits a gradual increase in powders milled for longer durations. Despite this increase, all samples exhibit ferromagnetic behavior, characterized by the presence of small magnetic domains, indicative of their soft ferromagnetic nature. This behavior is attributed to micro-distortions within the particles, resulting from extensive plastic deformation during the mechanical milling process. The observed trend in Ms is consistent with the observations in Tables I and II, where a decrease in crystallite size and an increase in lattice strain were noted. These interconnected factors collectively contribute to the change in Ms, highlighting the intricate relationship between structural modifications and magnetic properties in these nanostructured alloys. Furthermore, the presence of small magnetic domains suggests the presence of superparamagnetic behavior, which is typical in nanostructured materials and further supports the soft ferromagnetic nature of the samples.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Hysteresis curves of Fe90Si10 powder samples milled for 0, 15, and 30 h at room temperature.

Table III summarizes key magnetic parameters extracted from hysteresis curves shown in Fig. 6, including Hc, Ms, Mr, and Mr/Ms. The Ms values in Table III display significant variation, notably increasing from 87.73 emu/g to 159.27 emu/g after 30 hours of milling.48,49 This rise in Ms indicates improved magnetic properties due to structural changes induced by milling, such as grain refinement and increased lattice strain. These modifications enhance the magnetic behavior of nanostructured FeSi alloys, showcasing the effectiveness of mechanical milling in tailoring their magnetic properties. The increase in Ms is mainly attributed to the incorporation of diamagnetic Si atoms near Fe atoms, influencing iron’s magnetic moment. The heightened Ms is also notable for its reduced magneto-crystalline anisotropy, facilitating easier spin rotation.50 The lower saturation magnetization value observed in the unmilled powders with 90% Fe raises questions about the distinctive magnetic characteristics of these powders and highlights the intricate relationship among composition, milling duration, and magnetic properties.

Table III Magnetic parameters of nanostructured Fe90Si10 alloy milled for various durations

This discrepancy is explained by the dynamic interaction between Fe and Si atoms within the solid solution, where the initial reduction in Ms due to the diamagnetic influence of Si is overcome by the subsequent formation of the Fe(Si) solid solution, leading to an overall increase in Ms. This enhancement in Ms is attributed to various factors, including changes in magnetic ordering, electronic configuration, or spin alignment resulting from Si incorporation into the Fe lattice. Further understanding of these mechanisms can be obtained from additional details in the study or relevant literature.10

The observed increase in Hc can be attributed to the irreversible displacement of magnetic domain walls, induced by various types of defects such as alterations in microstructure, grain boundaries, internal strain, and dislocations. This increase in Hc reflects heightened magnetic anisotropy, especially at the beginning of the milling process.51,52 However, it is important to note that several factors can influence Hc. Lattice strain, along with potential underestimations in grain size and uniformity, can collectively affect coercivity. Research by Li et al.53 highlights that grain size, grain size distribution, and grain boundary chemistry significantly impact coercivity. Additionally, defects such as dislocations, grain boundaries, inclusions, and voids can contribute to Hc. In polycrystalline materials, the interaction of domain walls with grain boundaries plays a crucial role in Hc. As grain size decreases, the larger volume fraction of grain boundaries leads to increased Hc due to the hindering effect on domain wall (Bloch wall) motion.54 It is important to note that magneto-crystalline anisotropy also affects Hc.55,56

Moreover, the variations in Mr and Mr/Ms across different milling durations, as delineated in Table III, provide valuable insights into the material’s resistance to demagnetization. The remanence and squareness of FeSi surpass those of pure Fe owing to the incorporation of Si atoms into the alloy. Upon Si integration into the Fe lattice, localized magnetic moments with opposite directions to the Fe moments are created. This induces a decrease in the net magnetic moment of the Fe atoms, resulting in an overall reduction in the alloy’s magnetization. However, the existence of these Si-induced moments in FeSi concurrently contributes to an augmentation in magnetization remanence. These moments exhibit a tendency to align with the external magnetic field and retain their orientation even after the field is withdrawn. The magnetization remanence of FeSi exhibits variability with changes in Si content. With an initial increase in Si content, the magnetization remanence experiences a rise due to the aforementioned effect of Si-induced moments. Nevertheless, at higher Si concentrations, the magnetization remanence begins to decline. This decline is attributed to the interference of diamagnetic Si ions, which disrupt the ferromagnetic ordering of the Fe ions, leading to an overall reduction in the alloy’s magnetic moment. Consequently, the fluctuation in Si content emerges as a significant factor influencing the magnetization remanence of FeSi.57,58,59

Conclusions

The successful synthesis of nanostructured Fe90Si10 through ball milling from elemental Fe and Si powders was achieved, with significant findings revealed through SEM, XRD, and VSM analyses. XRD results indicated the formation of a (bcc) α-Fe(Si) solid solution, evolving through Si diffusion within the Fe lattice, with the lattice parameter increasing to 0.4528 nm after 30 h, accompanied by a reduction in crystallite size and an increase in lattice strain. The morphological evolution of the Fe90Si10 alloy displayed diverse shapes, transitioning from coarse particles to smaller, nearly spherical shapes, with some exhibiting layered Si and Fe structures, suggesting continued mechanical alloying and particle size refinement. The average particle size reduced from approximately 70 μm for the unmilled powders to around 10 μm after 30 h. EDS analysis confirmed the presence of all elements without any detectable impurities. The variations in magnetic properties were attributed to microstructural changes, specifically the concentration of atoms at particle and grain boundaries. The increase in Ms was linked to the presence of diamagnetic silicon (Si) atoms, which affected iron’s magnetic moment and decreased magneto-crystalline anisotropy. Elevated Hc, Mr, and Mr/Ms values were associated with the irreversible movement of magnetic domain walls induced by defects, highlighting heightened magnetic anisotropy in the material. This study provides valuable insights into the relationship between milling duration, structural properties, and magnetic behavior in nanostructured Fe90Si10 alloys, offering potential advancements in magnetic materials for various applications.