Abstract
Taper equations are an important tool in estimating stem volumes at a multi-product level for sustainable forest management. Nine taper equations are tested from three categories to estimate diameter at specified point on the stem, height at specified diameter, volumes of any desired portion of the stem, and whole tree volume of Taurus fir in Taurus Mountains of Turkey. To account for autocorrelation and multicollinearity present among multiple stem data observations collected from the same tree, proper statistical approaches were used in model fitting. Comparisons are made to determine which equation provides the best overall fit to all data based on four goodness-of-fit statistics, Coefficient of determination (R2); Root mean square error (RMSE), Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Results indicated that all taper equations tested could be used to accurately estimate section diameter at given height and stem volume. Clark et al.’s taper equation provided better results than the others for Taurus fir when an additional stem diameter observation at 5.30 m was available. Segmented and variable-form taper models consistently provided better results than the simple taper models except for Max and Burkhart’s model. Fang et al.’s and Kozak’s taper models showed equally good performance to describe stem taper and to predict tree stem volume. Therefore, these taper equations are able to be used to estimate diameter and volume for Taurus fir trees, if an upper stem diameter measurement was not available.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19(6): 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
Arias-Rodil M, Diéguez-Aranda U, Rodríguez Puerta F, López-Sanchez CA, Canga Líbano E, Cámara Obregón A, Castedo-Dorado F (2015) Modelling and localizing a stem taper function for Pinus radiata in Spain. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 45(6): 647–658. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2014-0276
Barrio-Anta M, Dieguez-Aranda U, Castedo-Dorado F, et al. (2007) Merchantable volume system for pedunculate oak in northwestern Spain. Annals of Forest Science 64: 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2007028
Bi H (2000) Trigonometric variable-form taper equations for Australian eucalypts. Forest Science 46(3): 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/46.3.397
Biging GS (1984) Taper equations for second-growth mixed conifers of Northern California. Forest Science 30(4): 1103–1117. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/30.4.1103
Bozkuş HF (1987) The natural distribution and silvicultural characteristics of Abies cilicica Carr. in Turkey. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Forestry A36(2): 103–131. (In Turkish)
Bozkuş H, Carus S (1997). Double accessed stem volume tables of Taurus fir (Abies cilicica Carr.) and cedar (Cedrus libani Link.) and the comparison of them with the ones. Journal of Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University 47(1): 51–70. (In Turkish)
Brooks JR, Jiang L, Özçelik R (2008) Compatible stem volume and taper equations for Brutian pine, Cedar of Lebanon, and Cilicica fir in Turkey. Forest Ecology and Management 256: 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.018
Cao QV, Wang J (2015) Evaluation of methods for calibrating a tree taper equation. Forest Science 61(2): 213–219. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.14-008
Cervera JM (1973) El área basimétrica reducida, el volumen reducido y el perfil. Montes 174: 415–418. (In Spanish)
Clark III, AC, Souter RA, Schlaegel BE (1991) Stem profile equations for southern tree species. Research Paper SE-282. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. 117 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/SE-RP-282
Coble DW, Hilpp K (2006) Compatible cubic-foot stem volume and upper-stem diameter equations for semi-intensive plantation grown loblolly pine trees in East Texas. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 30(3): 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/30.3.132
Corral-Rivas JJ, Diéguez-Aranda U, Corral-Rivas S, et al. (2007) A merchantable volume system for major pine species in El Salto, Durango (Mexico). Forest Ecology and Management 238(1–3): 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.074
Crecente-Campo F, Alboreca AR, Diéguez-Aranda U (2009) A merchantable volume system for Pinus sylvestris L. in the major mountain ranges of Spain. Annals of forest science 66(8): 808. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2009078
de-Miguel S, Mehtatalo L, Shater Z, et al. (2012) Evaluating marginal and conditional predictions of taper models in the absence of calibration data. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 42: 1383–1394. https://doi.org/10.1139/x2012-090
Dieguez-Aranda U, Castedo-Dorado F, Alvarez-Gonzalez JG, et al. (2006) Compatible Taper Function for Scots Pine Plantations in Northwestern Spain. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 1190–1205. https://doi.org/10.1139/x06-008
Doyog ND, Lee YJ, Lee SJ, et al. (2017) Compatible taper and stem volume equations for Larix kaempferi (Japanese larch) species of South Korea. Journal of Mountain Science 14(7): 1341–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4291-x
Ercanlı I, Günlü A, Başkent EZ (2015) Mixed effect models for predicting breast height diameter from stump diameter of Oriental beech in Göldağ. Scientia Agricola 72(3): 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-9016-2014-0225
Fang Z, Borders BE, Bailey RL (2000) Compatible volume-taper models for loblolly and slash pine based on a system with segmented-stem form factors. Forest Science 46(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/46.1.1
Figueiredo-Filho A, Borders BE, Hitch KL (1996) Taper equations for Pinus taeda plantations in Southern Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management 83(1–2): 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(96)03706-1
GDF (2015) Forest resources. General Directorate of Forest. Ankara, Turkey. p. 36. (In Turkish)
Heiðarsson L, Pukkala T (2011) Taper functions for lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) and Siberian larch (Larix sibirica) in Iceland. Icelandic Agricultural Sciences 24: 3–11.
Jiang L, Brooks JR, Wang J (2005) Compatible taper and volume equations for yellow-poplar in West Virginia. Forest Ecology and Management 213(1–3): 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.04.006
Klos RJ, Wang GG, Dang QL, et al. (2007) Taper equations for five major commercial tree species in Manitoba, Canada. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 22(3): 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/22.3.163
Kozak A, Kozak R (2003) Does cross validation provide additional information in the evaluation of regression models?. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33(6): 976–987. https://doi.org/10.1139/x03-022
Kozak A, Smith JHG (1993) Standards for evaluating taper estimating systems. The Forestry Chronicle 69(4): 438–444. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc69438-4
Kozak A (1988) A variable-exponent taper equation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18(11): 1363–1368. https://doi.org/10.1139/x88-213
Kozak A (2004). My last words on taper equations. The Forestry Chronicle 80(4): 507–515. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc80507-4
Kozak A, Munro DD, Smith JHG (1969) Taper functions and their application in forest inventory. The Forestry Chronicle 45(4): 278–283. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc45278-4
Lee WK, Seo JH, Son YM, et al. (2003) Modeling stem profiles for Pinus densiflora in Korea. Forest Ecology and Management 172(1): 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00139-1
Li R, Weiskittel AR (2010) Comparison of model forms for estimating stem taper and volume in the primary conifer species of the North American Acadian Region. Annals of Forest Science 67(3): 302. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2009109
Li R, Weiskittel A, Dick AR, et al. (2012) Regional stem taper equations for eleven conifer species in the Acadian region of North America: development and assessment. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 29(1): 5–14. https://doi.org/10.5849/njaf.10-037
Liu Y, Trancoso R, Ma Q, et al. (2020) Incorporating climate effects in Larix gmelinii improves stem taper models in the Greater Khingan Mountains of Inner Mongolia, northeast China. Forest Ecology and Management 464: 118065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118065
Max TA, Burkhart HE (1976). Segmented polynomial regression applied to taper equations. Forest Science 22(3): 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/22.3.283
Menéndez-Miguélez M, Canga E, Álvarez-Alvarez P, et al. (2014) Stem taper function for sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) coppice stands in northwest Spain. Annals of Forest Science 71: 761–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-014-0372-6
Muhairwe CK (1999) Taper equations for Eucalyptus pilularis and Eucalyptus grandis for the north coast in New South Wales, Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 113(2–3): 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00431-9
Myers RH, Myers RH (1990) Classical and modern regression with applications (Vol. 2), Duxbury press, Belmont, CA.
Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH (1990) Applied statistical models. Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Burr Ridge, IL.
Newnham R (1988) A variable-form taper function. Canadian Forest Service Petawawa National Forestry Institute Report PI-X-83.
Ormerod DW (1973) A simple bole model. The Forestry Chronicle 49(3): 136–138. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc49136-3
Özçelik R, Brooks JR (2012) Compatible volume and taper models for economically important tree species of Turkey. Annals of Forest Science 69(1): 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-011-0137-4
Özçelik R, Crecente-Campo F (2016) Stem Taper Equations for Estimating Merchantable Volume of Lebanon Cedar Trees in the Taurus Mountains, Southern Turkey. Forest Science 62(1): 78–91. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.14-212
Pancoast AD (2018) Evaluation of Taper and Volume Estimation Techniques for Ponderosa Pine in Eastern Oregon and Eastern Washington. Ms Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. p 50.
Perez DN, Burkhart HE, Stiff CT (1990) A variable-form taper function for Pinus oocarpa Schiede in Central Honduras. Forest Science 36(1): 186–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/36.1.186
Poudel KP, Cao QV (2013) Evaluation of methods to predict Weibull parameters for characterizing diameter distributions. Forest Science 59(2): 243–252. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.12-001
Poudel KP, Temesgen H, Gray AN (2018) Estimating upper stem diameters and volume of Douglas-fir and Western hemlock trees in the Pacific northwest. Forest Ecosystems 1: 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-018-0134-2
Rojo A, Perales X, Sánchez-Rodriguez F, et al. (2005) Stem taper functions for maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in Galicia (Northwestern Spain). European Journal of Forest Research 124(3): 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-005-0066-6
Sakıcı OE, Misir N, Yavuz H, et al. (2008) Stem taper functions for Abies nordmanniana subsp. bornmulleriana in Turkey. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 23: 522–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580802552453
SAS Institute Inc (2008) SAS/ETS 9.2 user’s guide. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. 2876 p.
Schröder T, Costa EA, Valèrio AF, et al. (2015) Taper equations for Pinus elliottii Engelm. In Southern Paraná, Brazil. Forest Science 61(2): 311–319. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.14-054
Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics 6(2): 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
Shahzad MK, Hussain A, Jiang L (2020) A model form for stem taper and volume estimates of Asian white birch (Betula platyphylla): a major commercial tree species of Northeast China. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 50(3): 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2019-0088
Sharma M, Parton J (2009) Modeling stand density effects on taper for jack pine and black spruce plantations using dimensional analysis. Forest Science 55(3): 268–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.035
Sharma M, Zhang SY (2004) Variable-exponent taper equations for jack pine, black spruce, and balsam fir in eastern Canada. Forest Ecology and Management 198(1–3): 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.035
Tasissa G, Burkhart HE (1998) An application of mixed effects analysis to modeling thinning effects on stem profile of loblolly pine. Forest Ecology and Management 103(1): 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00179-5
Trincado G, Burkhart HE (2006) A generalized approach for modeling and localizing stem profile curves. Forest Science 52(6): 670–682. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/52.6.670
West PW, Ratkowsky DA, Davis AW (1984) Problems of hypothesis testing of regressions with multiple measurements from individual sampling units. Forest Ecology and Management 7(3): 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(84)90068-9
Yaltırık F, Akkemik Ü (2011) Natural Gymnospermaes of Turkey. Ministry of Environment and Forest Press, Ankara, Turkey. p 214. (In Turkish)
Yang Y, Huang S, Trincado G, Meng SX (2009) Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling of variable-exponent taper equations for lodgepole pine in Alberta, Canada. European Journal of Forest Research 128(4): 415–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-009-0286-2
Acknowledgement
This research was based on the part of PhD dissertation and funded by the Suleyman Demirel University-Teaching Staff Training Program (Project number: OYP05250-DR-14).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alkan, O., Özçelik, R. Stem taper equations for diameter and volume predictions of Abies cilicica Carr. in the Taurus Mountains, Turkey. J. Mt. Sci. 17, 3054–3069 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-020-6071-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-020-6071-x