Introduction

Hydrogen, an eco-friendly and renewable energy carrier, has been considered as one of the most potential alternatives to fossil fuels to solve environmental damage and energy crisis in the future [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Electrochemical water splitting is an environment-friendly and efficient strategy for hydrogen production. To date, precious metal Pt-based materials were viewed as the most efficient HER electrocatalysts [8,9,10,11]. However, high cost and scarcity of noble metals have greatly hampered their practical applications in a large scale [12, 13]. To this end, developing highly active, stable, and low cost non-noble metal electrocatalysts is extremely crucial and desirable [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22].

So far, a range of non-noble metal electrocatalysts has been proved to be promising HER catalysts, such as transition metal borides, oxides, nitrides, carbides, and phosphides [23,24,25,26,27]. Among them, transition metal phosphides (TMPs) have been extensively studied in electrocatalytic field due to their structural similarity to hydrogenase [28,29,30]. Among the investigated TMPs, CoP has attracted wide attention because of its high conductivity, low-cost and high catalytic activities. However, the electrocatalytic performance of CoP still needs to be further improved when compared to noble metals due to the limited number of exposed active sites and poor charge-transfer ability [31,32,33,34]. Notably, studies have demonstrated that a proper introduction of different metal atoms into TMPs is an effective method to enhance the electrocatalytic activitity [35,36,37]. For example, Wang et al. reported that the Fe-doped Ni2P nanosheet array exhibited a superior OER performance compared to the pure Ni2P owing to the modulation of electronic structure [38].

Inspired by the work mentioned above, we designed and fabricated the Fe-doped CoP nanosheets (noted as Fe-CoP NSs) via a facile hydrothermal and subsequent phosphorization treatment. The resulting Fe1.5-CoP NSs catalyst was characterized to possess large surface area, numerous active sites, favorable mass transfer kinetics, and short charge transport pathways, which facilitate the hydrogen evolution reaction. Satisfactorily, the Fe-doped CoP NSs showed superior catalytic performance towards HER in comparison with pure CoP. Meanwhile, benefiting from the nanosheets structure and the strong interactions between Fe and CoP, the Fe-doped CoP NSs with the doping amount of 1.5 wt % exhibited the best catalytic activity with a low overpotential of 115 mV to reach 10 mA cm−2, outperforming the pristine CoP catalyst. Accordingly, this work provided an effective path for the widespread application of Fe1.5-CoP NSs as HER electrocatalyst through a simple two-step fabrication.

Results and discussion

Scheme 1 illustrates the synthesis process of Fex-doped CoP nanosheets (Fex-CoP NSs). Firstly, Fex-Co precursors were fabricated by hydrothermal method, and Fex-CoP NSs samples were successfully prepared via low temperature phosphorization of the as-obtained precursors under N2 atmosphere using NaH2PO2 as the phosphorus source.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Schematic illustration for the preparation process of Fe-doped CoP NSs

The detailed microstructure and morphology features of Fe1.5-Co precursors and Fe1.5-CoP NSs samples were firstly observed by SEM and TEM images, as shown in Fig. 1. The SEM image in Fig. 1a indicated that the Fe1.5-Co precursors were randomly arranged and regular nanosheet structure. As shown in Fig. 1b, the obtained Fe1.5-CoP NSs inherited the nanosheet morphology of Fe1.5-Co precursors with a thickness of about 130 nm, and nanoparticles appeared on the surface. The enlarged SEM image (Fig. 1c) more clearly displayed the nanoparticles on the surface of the nanosheet. In addition, the surface nanoparticles and the generated defects can also be further observed from the TEM image in Fig. 1d. In contrast, pure CoP without Fe doping remained a smooth nanosheet structure with a thickness of about 130 nm (Figs. S1 and S2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

SEM images of a, Fe1.5-Co precursors; b, c Fe1.5-CoP NSs; c, TEM image of Fe1.5-CoP NSs; e, HRTEM image; f, SAED image and gk corresponding element mapping of Fe1.5-CoP NSs

The HRTEM image in Fig. 1e illustrated the interplanar distances of approximately 0.28 nm and 0.24 nm, corresponding to the (011) and (111) planes of CoP, respectively [39, 40]. The absence of FeP lattice also proved that the Fe1.5-CoP NSs sample was composed of Fe-doping CoP instead of FeP/CoP composite [41]. The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern in Fig. 1f ascribed to the (011), (111), (211), and (301) planes of the CoP, respectively, exhibiting the polycrystalline structure of CoP [42]. Additionally, the EDS spectrum of Fe1.5-CoP NSs confirmed the co-existence of Fe, Co, P, and O elements (Fig. S3). And the elemental mapping in Fig. 1g–k further indicates the even distribution of Fe, Co, P, and O elements in Fe1.5-CoP NSs, which also illustrated that Fe doping was homogeneous. Similarly, the HRTEM image and SAED pattern of pure CoP without Fe doping in Fig. S3 also confirmed the successful synthesis of CoP [43].

To further examine the crystal structure of the samples, the as-obtained Fex-Co precursors and Fex-CoP NSs were analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD) [42]. For the Fex-Co precursors (Fig. S4), the typical diffraction peaks matched well with that of bare Co precursors, and no other apparent impurity peaks were watched, manifesting that Fe was successfully doped into the Co precursors. After phosphorization, it can be seen that the diffraction peaks of pure CoP NSs at 31.6°, 36.31°, 48.13°, and 56.78° were indexed well to the (011), (111), (211), and (301) planes (JCPDS No:29–0497), respectively (Fig. 2a). In addition, the diffraction peaks of Fex-CoP NSs were consistent with that of CoP and no Fe-related phase was detected, which was in good agreement with the HRTEM results [44]. Figure 2b shows the nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm plot of Fe1.5-CoP NSs, and the calculated BET specific surface area was 10 m2 g−1, which was larger than that of CoP NSs (Fig. S5, 4.72 m2 g−1). This larger BET surface indicated that Fe1.5-CoP NSs had a larger contact area and more active sites, which were favorable to enhance HER performance.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a XRD patterns of Fex-CoP NSs. b N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of Fe1.5-CoP NSs, and the inset is the corresponding pore size distributions. c XPS survey spectrum of Fe1.5-CoP NSs. df High-resolution XPS spectra for Fe 2p, Co 2p, and P 2p of Fe1.5-CoP NSs and CoP NSs

The valence states and elemental compositions of the Fe1.5-CoP NSs electrocatalyst were further characterized by the X-ray photoelectron spectroscope (XPS). In Fig. 2c, the XPS survey spectrum clearly revealed the presence of Fe, Co, P, and O elements in Fe1.5-CoP NSs, showing the consistency with the results of EDS. In the Co 2p spectrum of Fe1.5-CoP NSs (Fig. 2d), the binding energies (BEs) at 778.6 and 782.1 eV can be assigned to Co 2p3/2, while the BEs at 793.3 and 798.2 eV were attributed to Co 2p1/2 [45]. And the clear peaks at 803.0 and 786.4 eV were attributed to the corresponding satellite peaks. Compared with CoP, it should be noted that the peaks of Co 2p in Fe1.5-CoP NSs have a positive shift of 0.2 eV, which definitely revealed the strong interactions between Fe and CoP [46]. This modulated electronic structure in Fe1.5-CoP NSs enabled the enhancement of HER performance.

For the Fe 2p region (Fig. 2e), the two peaks at 713.5 and 716.8 eV were assigned to the Fe 2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2 for Fe3+, and the peaks at 721.2 eV can be attributed to the satellite peaks of Fe 2p [47]. In the case of the O1s spectrum (Fig. S6), the O 1 s located at 530.8 eV indicated the formation of an M–O bond in the catalyst. And in general, the peak at 531.8 eV was caused by the hydroxyl oxygen, while the fitted peak at 533.1 eV can be corresponded to the P-O bond. As regards the P 2p spectra, which can be fitted with three peaks, as shown in Fig. 2f, the peaks at 129.5 and 130.2 eV were attributed to P 2p3/2 and P 2p1/2, respectively [48]. Meanwhile, the peak centered at 134.3 eV revealed the oxidized metal phosphate species because of the exposure to air. Comparing with the P 2p spectra of pure CoP NSs, it can be seen that the peaks of P 2p in the Fe1.5-CoP NSs exhibited a weak negative direction shift, demonstrating that Fe doping can produce strong interactions between Fe, Co, and P [49]. In short, all the above XPS results revealed that Fe was doped into CoP successfully, and Fe doping can affect the electronic structure of CoP [44].

The electrocatalytic activity of CoP NSs and different Fe-doped CoP NSs toward HER was tested using a three-electrode system in 1.0 M KOH. Figure 3a shows the linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves of the set of samples. Pt/C catalyst exhibited the best catalytic activity having the smallest overpotential and Tafel slope. As expected, Fex-CoP NSs exhibited improved catalytic activity with a lower onset potential compared to CoP [48, 50]. Moreover, Fe1.5-CoP NSs showed obviously superior HER performance among Fex-CoP NSs, requiring the smallest overpotential of 115 mV to deliver the current density of 10 mA cm−2, in comparison to those of Fe1-CoP NSs (142 mV), Fe2-CoP NSs (187 mV), and CoP NSs (232 mV). This indicated that the introduction of Fe could remarkably enhance the HER performance. The Tafel slopes of various catalysts were calculated based on LSV to further explore the HER kinetics of Fe1.5-CoP NSs. As shown in Fig. 3b, Fe1.5-CoP NSs exhibited the lowest Tafel slope of 72 mV dec−1, which was much smaller than those of Fe1-CoP NSs (78 mV dec−1), Fe2-CoP NSs (82 mV dec−1), and CoP NSs (104 mV dec−1); thus, suggesting an appropriate amount of Fe doping in CoP played a great significant role in optimizing the performance of HER [51].

Fig. 3
figure 3

a LSV curves of Pt, Fe1.5-CoP, Fe1-CoP, Fe2-CoP and CoP NSs in 1 M KOH, b corresponding Tafel slopes, c EIS and d Cdl of different catalysts, e LSV curves of Fe1.5-CoP NSs before and after 3000 cycles, f chronoamperometry curves of Fe1.5-CoP NSs for HER

To further elucidate the intrinsic activity of Fe-doped CoP, electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) measurements were performed in 1 M KOH. Generally, the value of charge transfer resistance (Rct) varies inversely to the electrocatalytic reaction rate [52]. As seen in Fig. 3c, the Rct of Fe1.5-CoP NSs (16.7 Ω) was significantly smaller than that of Fe1-CoP NSs (19.7 Ω), Fe2-CoP NSs (42 Ω), and CoP NSs (46.3 Ω), suggesting a faster electron transfer rate for HER. Additionally, another key factor of the improved HER catalytic activity is the electrochemical surface area (ECSA), which can be roughly examined by electrochemical double-layer capacitance (Cdl) [53]. Figure S9 shows the cyclic voltammogram (CV) curves of CoP NSs and Fe-doped CoP NSs from 10 to 100 mV·s−1; the Cdl values were obtained by calculation. Among them, the Cdl of Fe1.5-CoP NSs was calculated to be 11 mF cm−2 (Fig. 3d), which was notably larger than those of Fe1-CoP NSs (8.9 mF cm−2), Fe2-CoP NSs (6 mF cm−2) and CoP NSs (2.3 mF cm−2). As depicted in Fig. S10, Fe1.5-CoP NSs showed the highest ECSA (550 cm2) among all the investigated samples, signifying that it could provide abundant active sites to enhance the HER electrocatalyst performance [38].

Apart from good catalytic performance, HER long-term durability is other important factor to evaluate electrocatalysts. The stability of Fe1.5-CoP NSs was evaluated by continuous cyclic voltammetry [41]. As depicted in Fig. 3e, negligible change was observed in polarization curves of Fe1.5-CoP NSs after 3000 cycles. Besides, the chronoamperometry measurement (Fig. 3f) revealed that Fe1.5-CoP NSs exhibited a negligible degradation after continuous test for 12 h, and the LSV curve of Fe1.5-CoP NSs (Fig. S11a) showed negligible shift, demonstrating its outstanding catalytic stability. Meanwhile, the XRD pattern in Fig. S11c exhibits no obvious crystal structure change and the morphology (Fig. S11b and S11d) of Fe1.5-CoP NSs was entirely maintained after a long-term HER test. Furthermore, compared with the original spectrum in Fig. 2, the positions and intensities of the peaks relating to Fe 2p, Co 2p, P 2p, and O 1 s also showed no obvious changes (Fig. S12). These results further prove that Fe1.5-CoP NSs had superior stability for hydrogen evolution reaction.

Conclusions

In summary, we reported a two-step method using hydrothermal and phosphorization treatment for the preparation of Fe1.5-CoP NSs as an efficient HER electrocatalyst. Compared with pure CoP, the as-prepared Fe1.5-CoP NSs showed significantly enhanced catalytic performance for HER, which can be ascribed to the electronic structure modulation led by proper introduction of Fe into CoP, which was confirmed by XPS results. Furthermore, the two-dimensional nanosheet structure also exposed a mass of active sites, which facilitated the HER process. Specifically, Fe1.5-CoP NSs maintained a long-term extraordinary stability and durability after the continuous operation of 12 h. Therefore, this work provided a valid method for designing and fabricating low-cost and high-activity HER electrocatalysts, which is surely applicable for boosting the development of hydrogen industry.