Abstract
Microplastics (MPs) are widespread pollutants of emerging concern, and the risks associated with their ingestion have been reported in many organisms. Terrestrial environments can be contaminated with MPs, and terrestrial organisms, including arthropods, are predisposed to the risk of ingesting MPs. In the current study, the larvae of the paper wasp Polistes satan were fed two different doses (6 mg or 16 mg at once) of polystyrene MPs (1.43 mm maximum length), and the effects of these treatments on immature development and survival till adult emergence were studied. Ingestion of the two doses resulted in mortality due to impaired defecation prior to pupation. The survival of larvae that ingested 16 mg of MPs was significantly lower than that of the control. The ingestion of 16 mg of MPs also reduced the adult emergence (11.4%) in comparison to the control (44.4%). MPs were not transferred from the larvae to the adults that survived. These findings demonstrate that MP ingestion can be detrimental to P. satan, e.g. larval mortality can decrease colony productivity and thus the worker force, and that MPs can potentially affect natural enemies that occur in crops, such as predatory social wasps.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Plastic pollution is a global concern and has been detected in marine, freshwater, and terrestrial ecosystems (Lusher 2015; Lusher et al. 2015; Li et al. 2018; Choi et al. 2021). Agricultural, urban and industrial runoff, landfills, and littering are examples of plastic waste sources (Cozar et al. 2014; Hamid et al. 2018; Machado et al. 2018; Xu et al. 2020). Biotic and abiotic processes cause the fragmentation of environmental plastic waste (GESAMP 2015; Auta et al. 2018; Hamid et al. 2018). These small fragments are known as microplastics (MPs), defined by Frias and Nash (2019) as “any synthetic solid particle or polymeric matrix, with regular or irregular shapes, and sizes ranging from 1 μm to 5 mm, of either primary or secondary manufacturing origin, which are insoluble in water.” Thus, MPs occur in various shapes, such as spheres, fibers, pellets, and beads; they also vary in chemical composition, including polyester, polystyrene, polyethylene, polypropylene, and polyvinyl chloride particles (Ng et al. 2018). Some of these plastics originate from petroleum, including polystyrene, which is often found as expanded polystyrene, popularly known as Styrofoam (Ho et al. 2018). Its lifespan is indefinite, suggesting its potential to accumulate in the environment.
Current data suggest that MP concentrations in freshwater sediments exceed those in marine systems (Obbard et al. 2014; Eerkes-Medrano et al. 2015; Tubau et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2021; Jiang et al. 2022). In these ecosystems, MP contamination has been reported in biota at different trophic levels (Auta et al. 2017; Brookson et al. 2019). Studies on the presence of MPs in the biota of terrestrial ecosystems are limited, despite terrestrial environments being a substantial source of MPs (Jambeck et al. 2015; Machado et al. 2018; D’Souza et al. 2020). Terrestrial ecosystems, for example agricultural soils, can contain more MPs than oceanic basins (Nizzetto et al. 2016; Xu et al. 2020). Therefore, like aquatic organisms, terrestrial organisms can be exposed to and even ingest MPs.
Numerous organisms, including invertebrates, ingest MPs that can pass through the digestive tract without detectable effects (Ugolini et al. 2013; Hamer et al. 2014; Kaposi et al. 2014; Santana et al. 2018; Weber et al. 2018); but damage to organs, tissues, and cells, or changes in behavior, often causing mortality, has also been reported (Blarer and Burkhardt-Holm 2016; Sussarellu et al. 2016; Alomar et al. 2017; Lo and Chan 2018). The ingestion of MPs by earthworms (Lwanga et al. 2016; Jiang et al. 2020; Lahive et al. 2019), nematodes (Lei et al. 2018a, b), fruit flies (Demir 2021), and honeybees (Deng et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2021; Balzani et al. 2022; Buteler et al. 2022; Naggar et al. 2023) can be lethal. Instead, ingesting MPs did not appear to cause mortality in snails (Song et al. 2019), nor silkworms (Muhammad et al. 2021). The paucity of data and lack of knowledge concerning the interaction between MPs and terrestrial species is surprising, especially for economically important taxa, including wasps.
Social wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) are valuable biological control agents that effectively prey on a variety of agricultural and urban pests (Prezoto et al. 2019; Southon et al. 2019). During their foraging activities, they interact with different environmental components, such as air, water basins, soil, plants, and other animals (Richter 2000). MP contamination has been found in many of these locations and resources (Al-Jaibachi et al. 2018; Wen et al. 2018; Azeem et al. 2021), which are also used by wasps for nest construction or feeding purposes, including mood, water, nectar, and insect prey (Richards 2000; Liebezeit and Liebezeit 2015).
The presence of MPs has been detected in the body surface and gut of adult wasps, as well as in the fecal masses of their larvae, indicating that social wasps may be exposed to MPs through contact or oral routes (Skaldina et al. 2023; Urbini et al. 2006). Additionally, agricultural areas where social wasps are abundant (Barbosa et al. 2016) are among the most MP-contaminated terrestrial environments (Ng et al. 2018). Therefore, similar to other social insects (Edo et al. 2021), social wasps may also be exposed to MPs.
Oral exposure to MPs may pose consequences to wasps. The lumens of the midgut and hindgut are not connected in the larvae of most Apocritan Hymenoptera (many wasps, bees, and ants) (Peters 2012). Consequently, during larval development, the midgut accumulates waste, such as indigested particles from preys. Prior to metamorphosis, the lumens of the midgut and hindgut become connected, and this accumulated material or meconium (enclosed by the peritrophic matrix) is expelled from the body (Spradbery 1973; Kojima 1996). This defecation helps the larvae eliminate the pollutants ingested. Alternatively, it could represent a critical period during which these insects are more vulnerable to detrimental effects associated with the ingestion of plastics (Murray and Cowie 2011; Wright et al. 2013; Puskik et al. 2020).
In this work, the effects of ingesting polystyrene (a widely used synthetic polymer and a significant contributor to microplastic pollution in the environment) MPs on the development of the social wasp Polistes satan were investigated. The following hypotheses were tested: (1) larvae ingest food with polystyrene MPs; (2) wasp mortality at the immature stage increases with MP ingestion; and (3) larval defecation is impaired by MP ingestion. To this end, a laboratory bioassay was performed to compare food ingestion, survival, and defecation between larvae that ingested food contaminated with high doses of polystyrene MPs (acute oral exposure) and larvae that ingested food without MPs (control).
Methods
Microplastics
Polystyrene granules (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) were ground in an ordinary blender. The granules were crushed in order to obtain the smallest possible particles in the form of powder stuck to the wall of the blender jar. This powder carefully brushed off and collected in a 50 mL centrifuge tube, which was stored at room temperature. For characterization, microparticles were stuck to double-sided adhesive tape previously mounted on aluminum blocks (stubs), metallized with gold in a sputtering device, and observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM VP1430 LEO, LEO Electron Microscopy Ltd., Cambridge, UK Kingdom) at the Centro de Microscopia e Microanálise da Universidade Federal de Viçosa (NMM-UFV).
Wasps
In November 2020, combs from 18 colonies of P. satan were collected from the roof of a house on a coffee farm in the municipality of Alpinópolis, Minas Gerais state, southeast Brazil (-20° 51′ 49.00″ S, -46° 23′ 17.02″ W). In this species, a single colony can contain multiple combs, each of which is independently attached to the substrate by a peduncle (Supplementary Material S1), thus allowing the collection of immature wasps while keeping most of the colony intact. Forceps were used to collect one comb full of late-instar larvae from each colony (Supplementary material S1). These combs were individually kept in plastic cages of 1 L and transported in the dark within a thermal bag to the Laboratório de Abelhas e Vespas (LAV) at the Universidade Federal de Viçosa. The day after, last-instar larvae (5th instar) were carefully removed from the nest cell with forceps, sized by estimating the maximum head width (Eickworth 1969), then individualized in a well of a 96-well-plate (Fig. 1), which was then kept in a plastic tray within an incubator at 28 ± 1 °C, RH 70 ± 5% in the dark. Our sample comprised 99 larvae (3–12 individuals per colony; 18 colonies).
Bioassay
Two days after transference to the well-plates, the larvae were provided with food containing MPs (1.43 mm maximum length) (supplementary material S1) over a single feeding event at 8 A.M. To the best of our knowledge, there were no publications on the ingestion of MPs by wasps that we could refer to. Each larva was allowed to ingest for five minutes a mashed T. molitor pupa mixed with 6 mg of MPs (lowest dose) or 16 mg of MPs (highest dose), weighed on a precision scale. The particles were added to mashed prey body, simulating ingestion of MPs via the food web, therefore allowing us to test potential oral exposure risk. Attempting to add the particles into liquid food (sucrose solution or water) would be difficult because the particles are not soluble in water. In the control group, mashed T. molitor pupae without MPs were added to larvae. Afterwards, the larvae (treated or control) received food without MPs until they started cocoon weaving.
When the larvae started cocoon weaving, they were transferred individually to 2 mL-microcentrifuge tubes (Supplementary material S1); the tube opening was plugged with cotton to allow them to develop (Supplementary material S1). The survival of individuals was checked every day for up to 40 days, from the beginning of cocoon weaving until adult emergence. The larvae that died before the start of cocoon weaving (N = 2) were not counted. Thus, our final sample for the bioassay comprised 97 individuals, distributed as follows: 34 and 27 individuals fed 6 mg and 16 mg of MPs respectively, and 36 individuals not fed MPs (control). It was registered whether or not each larvae ate the T. molitor prey (with or without MPs) at the beginning of the treatment. The larvae were inspected daily to check for the presence of regurgitated MPs. Survival was assessed once per day, from the beginning of larval cocoon weaving until adult emergence or immature death. Individuals were considered dead if they did not move in response to the mechanical stimulation. Deaths were recorded before, during, and after defecation (Fig. 2). The number of adults that emerged was recorded. Dead, immature or emerged adults were individually stored in ethanol 70%, and then dissected to track the location of MPs inside the gut or in the abdominal caveat.
Statistical Analysis
To test if larvae ingest food with MPs, the proportion of wasps that ate all the T. molitor prey (with or without MPs) in each treatment (0, 6 and 16 mg MPs) at the beginning of the treatment was counted.
To test whether MP ingestion causes mortality at the immature stage, survival curves were obtained with Kaplan–Meier estimators and were first analyzed using the log-rank test. Subsequently, pairwise comparisons were performed using the Bonferroni’s adjustment.
To further investigate whether MP ingestion causes mortality at the immature stage, it was examined whether MP ingestion by wasp larvae affected the probability of reaching adulthood by fitting binomial generalized linear models. Whether an individual reached adulthood was considered the response variable, diet treatment a fixed effect, the wasp nest origin a random effect, and the maximum head width of the larvae as a covariate. The random effect resulted in a singular fit with forced us to discard it from the model, and then the covariate was tested by the chi-squared test in a reduced model (without the random effect). Finally, since the covariate was not significant (P > 0.05), estimates were obtained from the simplest model (without both random and covariate effects) and compared using Tukey’s test.
To test whether impaired defecation at the immature stage was a consequence of ingesting MPs, the effect of diet treatments on the probability of immature wasps dying before, during, and after defecation was examined. To this end, binomial generalized linear models were fitted. Firstly, the data from (only) dead larvae were binarized into “before” or “not before,” “during” or “not during,” and “after” or “not after” the defecation stage to create three different binomial variables. In each model, one of these three variables was entered as the response variable, and diet treatment was entered as a fixed effect. In these studies, random effect (nest origin) was not tested since it also showed singularity fits and covariate effect (maximum head width of the larvae) was discarded because it did not show any improvement of the models (P > 0.05).
All data were analyzed using R software (R Core Team 2020) with a significance level of P < 0.05.
Results
P. satan larvae ingested food containing MPs. All larvae (N = 97) were fed T. molitor, regardless of the presence or concentration of MPs. After MP ingestion, T. molitor were not detected on the head of the larvae.
The ingestion of MPs killed the immature larvae. The overall log-rank test indicated a significant survival difference among the treatments (\({\chi }^{2}\) = 9.8, df = 2, P = 0.007, Fig. 3A). The survival curve of larvae that ingested the highest dose (16 mg) of MPs differed from that of the control (\({\chi }^{2}\) = 8.14, df = 1, P = 0.013). The survival curve of the larvae treated with the lowest dose (6 mg) of MPs did not differ from that of the larvae treated with the highest dose of MPs (\({\chi }^{2}\) = 2.75, df = 1, P = 0.291) or the control (\({\chi }^{2}\) = 3.54, df = 1, P = 0.18).
Ingestion of MPs by larvae also affected the probability of reaching adulthood. In the binomial generalized linear models, the inclusion of wasp nest origin as a random effect was discarded due to a singular fit, as was the inclusion of head size as a covariate (larval head width: mean = 2.99 mm; standard deviation = 0.18; range = 2.64–3.5 mm) due to its non-significance (\({\chi }^{2}\)= 0.1034, df = 1, P = 0.7478). Therefore, a pairwise comparison between treatments was carried out with estimates obtained from the most parsimonious and simple model, that is, that with only the fixed effect (treatments and control), as shown in Fig. 3B. Reaching adulthood was more frequent in the control (44.4%), followed by larvae treated with the lowest (20.6%) and highest concentration of MPs (11.1%), respectively. The only statistically significant difference in the probability of reaching adulthood occurred between the control and larvae treated with the highest concentration of MP (z = -2.659, P = 0.021).
Ingestion of MPs impaired defecation at the larval/pupal transition. As is shown in Fig. 4, most deaths (> 60%) occurred after defecation and only a few deaths (< 5%) occurred before defecation. Deaths during the defecation only occurred in the larvae treated with MPs, corresponding to 29.60% and 33.33% of deaths in larvae treated with the lowest and highest doses of MPs, respectively. The treatments did not affect the probability of dying before defecation (\({\chi }^{2}\)= 1.3532, df = 2, P = 0.5083), but did affect the probability of dying during defecation (\({\chi }^{2}\)= 12.403, df = 2, P = 0.002). The treatments also increased the probability of death after defecation (\({\chi }^{2}\)= 14.269, df = 2, P = 0.0008), which was likely a consequence of the many deaths of treated larvae during defecation.
The ingested MPs were only found in the endoperitrophic space or food bolus (Supplementary Material S1). In larvae that died before defecation, MPs were homogeneously distributed along the lumen of the midgut. Instead, the peritrophic matrix was partially egested in the larvae that died during defecation. In such cases, the MPs were concentrated at the end of the larval body, near the anus, thereby preventing the luminal content or meconium from being completely egested, resulting in anomalous defecation. MPs can always be recovered from the meconium in individuals that defecate successfully. MPs were not detected in adults derived from larvae that had ingested these particles.
Discussion
In this study, it was demonstrated that P. satan larvae ingested food containing high doses of MPs. Therefore, ingestion is a likely exposure route for MPs in the social wasp larvae. Some animals can recognize and avoid ingesting MPs (Ryan et al. 2019; Xu et al. 2022), while others regurgitate MPs after ingesting them (Saborowski et al. 2019). None of these behaviors were detected in P. satan larvae, because all the larvae consumed T. molitor prey regardless of the presence or dose of MPs, and MPs were never found over the larval head or around the larval body after MP ingestion. In our experiment, the contaminated prey was offered to the larvae for five minutes, so they had the opportunity to ingest it or not. The exposed larvae fully ingested the contaminated prey just as they ingested prey without MPs before and after exposure, and just as control larvae ingested prey without MPs. Other insect larvae, including mealworms (Wu et al. 2019), silkworms (Muhammad et al. 2021), and fruit flies (Demir et al. 2022), are capable of ingesting MPs and they have been successfully used in experiments with these pollutants. These herbivorous insects may ingest microplastics present on the surface of leaves or in the soil. As a result, these particles can be transferred through the food web, affecting other organisms that rely on these insects as a food source (Rondoni et al. 2021; Kallenbach et al. 2022).
Our bioassay simulated a likely contamination scenario. Under field conditions, social wasp larvae are fed by foragers (e.g., nectar and prey) and cannot choose the quality or quantity of food they will receive, but they can choose whether or not to ingest. The absence of food avoidance and regurgitation related to MP ingestion indicated that the risk of exposure of social wasp larvae to MPs in realistic scenarios cannot be neglected.
The use of high dosages (6 or 16 mg of MPs) in our assay is in line with previous studies with aquatic organisms (Au et al. 2015; Ogonowski et al. 2016; Watts et al. 2016; Yin et al. 2018) and may be useful to determine a potential tipping point for harmful effects of MPs in P. satan (Cunningham and Sigwart 2019). The ingestion of 6 mg or 16 mg of MPs by wasp larvae simulate a heavily polluted environment. This worst-case scenario, however, can be supported by recent studies showing that other hymenopterans, like solitary bees, can build nests partially (Maclvor and Moore 2013; Wilson et al. 2020; Quintos-Andrades et al. 2021) or even fully (Allasino et al. 2019) using plastic collected in landscapes. Finally, the ingestion of high doses of MPs by P. satan emphasizes the ability of wasp larvae to ingest MPs and the negative effects associated with their ingestion, thereby constituting an appropriate approach for the first screening of the potential effect of this contaminant in social wasps.
The ingestion of polystyrene MPs caused mortality at the immature stage and also decreased the probability of reaching adulthood, at least in wasps that were fed the highest dose of MPs, thus confirming the detrimental effect of this contaminant. Ingestion of MPs by other terrestrial (silkworms: Muhammad et al. 2021) and marine (sea urchins: Kaposi et al. 2014; slipper snails: Lo and Chan 2018; decapod crustaceans: Cole et al. 2013) larvae did not appear to be lethal. The type, size, shape, and dose of ingested MPs could explain the different results regarding the mortality of invertebrate larvae that ingested MPs. Future studies with different taxa are important to better understand which species are more or less sensitive to MPs.
In this study, mortality during defecation only occurred in larvae that ingested MPs, confirming that impaired defecation is a consequence of ingesting MPs. The time of larval defecation seems to represent a critical period in which social wasp larvae could be more vulnerable to detrimental effects associated with MP ingestion. Impaired defecation after plastic ingestion has been demonstrated in lobsters (Murray and Cowie 2011), marine worms (Wright et al. 2013), and vertebrates (Puskic et al. 2020). Therefore, this seems to be a common effect across animal taxa.
Here, a successful larval-rearing protocol for social wasps was described. To our knowledge, the only previous test was performed almost a century ago by Gaul (1940), who reported the successful rearing of P. fuscatus from eggs to adults. In light of the increasing levels of plastic pollution worldwide, this protocol makes a valuable contribution as it provides a controlled environment to investigate the impacts of plastic on wasp development, which is essential for a more comprehensive understanding of the problem.
Conclusions
The ingestion of polystyrene MPs during post-embryonic development is detrimental to paper wasps, at least under high experimental dosages. Furthermore, a protocol for the in vitro larval rearing of these predators was described and successfully used to test the effects of MP ingestion on wasps. The risk of ingesting MPs by P. satan larvae cannot be neglected, as they did not avoid or regurgitate food containing MPs, which caused mortality due to impaired defecation. Thus, during the larval period, individuals are vulnerable to particulate anthropogenic pollutants. Massive defecation by larvae is an evolutionarily conserved trait among most Apocritan Hymenoptera, and potentially, ingesting MPs can also be detrimental in ants and bees.
Availability of data and materials
All data will be made available on request.
References
Al-Jaibachi R, Cuthbert RN, Callaghan A (2018) Up and away: ontogenic transference as a pathway for aerial dispersal of microplastics. Biol Let 14(9):20180479. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0479
Alomar C, Sureda A, Capó X, Guijarro B, Tejada S, Deudero S (2017) Microplastic ingestion by Mullus surmuletus Linnaeus, 1758 fish and its potential for causing oxidative stress. Environ Res 159:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.043
Allasino ML, Marrero HJ, Dorado J, Torretta JP (2019) Scientific note: first global report of a bee nest built only with plastic. Apidologie 50(2):230–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-019-00635-6
Au SY, Bruce TF, Bridges WC, Klaine SJ (2015) Responses of Hyalella azteca to acute and chronic microplastic exposures. Environ Toxicol Chem 34(11):2564–2572. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3093
Auta H, Emenike C, Jayanthi B, Fauziah S (2018) Growth kinetics and biodeterioration of polypropylene microplastics by Bacillus sp. And Rhodococcus sp. Isolated from mangrove sediment. Mar Pollut Bull 127:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.036
Auta HS, Emenike CU, Fauziah SH (2017) Screening of Bacillus strains isolated from mangrove ecosystems in Peninsular Malaysia for microplastic degradation. Environ Pollut 231:1552–1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.043
Azeem I, Adeel M, Ahmad MA, Shakoor N, Jiangcuo GD, Azeem K, Ishfaq M, Shakoor A, Ayaz M, Xu M, Rui Y (2021) Uptake and accumulation of nano/microplastics in plants: a critical review. Nanomaterials 11(11):2935. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112935
Balzani P, Galeotti G, Scheggi S, Masoni A, Santini G, Baracchi D (2022) Acute and chronic ingestion of polyethylene (PE) microplastics has mild effects on honey bee health and cognition. Environ Pollut 305:119318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119318
Barbosa BC, Detoni M, Maciel TT, Prezoto F (2016) Studies of social wasp diversity in Brazil: Over 30 years of research, advancements and priorities. Sociobiology, 63(3), 858–880. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v63i3.1031
Blarer P, Burkhardt-Holm P (2016) Microplastics affect assimilation efficiency in the freshwater amphipod Gammarus fossarum. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:23522–23532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7584-2
Brookson CB, De Solla SR, Fernie KJ, Cepeda M, Rochman CM (2019) Microplastics in the diet of nestling double-crested cormorants (Phalacrocorax waters), an obligate piscivore in a freshwater ecosystem. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 76(11):2156–2163. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2018-0388
Buteler M, Alma AM, Stadler T, Gingold AG, Manattini MC, Lozada M (2022) Acute toxicity of microplastic fibers to honeybees and effects on foraging behavior. Sci Total Environ 822:153320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153320
Choi Y, Kim Y, Yoon J, Dickinson N, Kim K (2021) Plastic contamination of forest, urban, and agricultural soils: a case study of Yeoju City in the Republic of Korea. J Soils Sediments 21:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02759-0
Cole M, Lindeque P, Fileman E, Halsband C, Goodhead R, Moger J, Galloway TS (2013) Microplastic ingestion by zooplankton. Environ Sci Technol 47(12):6646–6655. https://doi.org/10.1021/es400663f
Cozar A, Echevarria F, Gonzalez-Gordillo J, Irigoien X, Ubeda B, Hernandez-Leon S, Palma A, Navarro S, Garcia-de-Lomas J, Ruiz A, Fernandez-de-Puelles M, Duarte C (2014) Plastic debris in the open ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:10239–10244. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.131470511
Cunningham EM, Sigwart JD (2019) Environmentally accurate microplastic levels and their absence from exposure studies. Integr Comp Biol 59(6):1485–1496. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icz068
Demir TF, Akkoyunlu G, Demir E (2022) Interactions of ingested polystyrene microplastics with heavy metals (cadmium or silver) as environmental pollutants: a comprehensive in vivo study using Drosophila melanogaster. Biology 11(10):1470
Demir E (2021) Adverse biological effects of ingested polystyrene microplastics using Drosophila melanogaster as a model in vivo organism. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health A. 84, 649–660 https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2021.1913684
Deng Y, Jiang X, Zhao H, Yang S, Gao J, Wu Y, Diao Q, Hou C (2021) Microplastic polystyrene ingestion promotes the susceptibility of honeybee to viral infection. Environ Sci Technol 55(17):11680–11692. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c01619
D’Souza JM, Windsor FM, Santillo D, Omerod SJ (2020) Food web transfer of plastics to an apex riverine predator. Glob Change Biol 26:3846–3857. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15139
Edo C, Fernández-Alba AR, Vejsnæs F, van der Steen JJ, Fernández-Piñas F, Rosal R (2021) Honeybees as active samplers for microplastics. Sci Total Environ 767:144481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144481
Eerkes-Medrano D, Thompson RC, Aldridge DC (2015) Microplastics in freshwater systems: a review of the emerging threats, identification of knowledge gaps and prioritization of research needs. Water Res 75:63–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.012
Eickwort KR (1969) Differential variation of males and females in Polistes exclamans. Evolution, 391–405
Frias JP, Nash R (2019) Microplastics: Finding a consensus on the definition. Mar Pollut Bull 138:145–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.022
Gaul AT (1940) A note on rearing the brood of Polistes fuscatus, Fabricius (Hymenoptera-Vespidæ). J New York Entomol Soc 48(4):391–393
GESAMP, 2015. Sources, fate and effects of microplastics in the marine environment: a global assessment. In: Kershaw, P.J. (Ed.), IMO/FAO/UNESCO-IOC/UNIDO/-WMO/ IAEA/UN/UNEP/UNDP. Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection Reports and Studies. GESAMP No. 90 (96 pp.).
Hamer J, Gutow L, Ko€hler A, Saborowski R (2014) Fate of microplastics in the marine isopod Idotea emarginata. Environ Sci Technol. 48 (22), 13451e13458. https://doi.org/10.1021/es501385y
Hamid FS, Bhatti M, Anuar N, Anuar N, Mohan P, Periathamby A (2018) Worldwide distribution and abundance of microplastic: how dire is the situation? Waste Manag Res 36:873–897. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X18785730
Ho BT, Roberts TK, Lucas S (2018) An overview on biodegradation of polystyrene and modified polystyrene: the microbial approach. Critical reviews in biotechnology, 38(2), 308–320, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2017.1355293
Jambeck JR, Geyer R, Wilcox C, Siegler TR, Perryman M, Andrady A, Narayan R, Law KL (2015) Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347(6223):768–771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352
Jiang Y, Yang F, Kazmi SSUH, Zhao Y, Chen M, Wang J (2022) A review of microplastic pollution in seawater, sediments and organisms of the Chinese coastal and marginal seas. Chemosphere 286:131677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131677
Jiang X, Chang Y, Zhang T, Qiao Y, Klobučar G, Li M (2020) Toxicological effects of polystyrene microplastics on earthworm (Eisenia fetida). Environ Pollut 259:113896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113896
Kallenbach EM, Eriksen TE, Hurley RR, Jacobsen D, Singdahl-Larsen C, Friberg N (2022) Plastic recycling plant as a point source of microplastics to sediment and macroinvertebrates in a remote stream. Microplastics and Nanoplastics 2(1):1–15
Kaposi KL, Mos B, Kelaher BP, Dworjanyn SA (2014) Ingestion of microplastic has limited impact on a marina larva. Environ Sci Technol. 48 (3), 1638e1645. https://doi.org/10.1021/es404295e
Kojima J (1996) Meconium egestion by larvae of Ropalidia Guérin (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) without adult aid, with a note on the evolution of meconium extraction behaviour in the tribe Ropalidiini. Aust J Entomol 35(1):73–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-6055.1996.tb01364.x
Lahive E, Walton A, Horton AA, Spurgeon DJ, Svendsen C (2019) Microplastic particles reduce reproduction in the terrestrial worm Enchytraeus crypticus in a soil exposure. Environ Pollut, 255, 113174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113174
Lei L, Wu S, Lu S, Liu M, Song Y, Fu Z, Shi H, Raley-Susman KM, He D (2018a) Microplastic particles cause intestinal damage and other adverse effects in zebrafish Danio rerio and nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci Total Environ 619:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.103
Lei L, Liu M, Song Y, Lu S, Hu J, Cao C, Xie B, Shi H, He D (2018b) Polystyrene (nano)microplastics cause size-dependent neurotoxicity, oxidative damages and other adverse effects in Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Sci Nano 5:2009–2020. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EN00412A
Li J, Liu H, Paul Chen J (2018) Microplastics in freshwater systems: a review on occurrence, environmental effects, and methods for microplastics detection. Water Res 137:362–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.056
Liebezeit G, Liebezeit E (2015) Origin of synthetic particles in honeys. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 65(2)
Lo HKA, Chan KYK (2018) Negative effects of microplastic exposure on growth and development of Crepidula onyx. Environ Pollut 233:588–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.095
Lusher A (2015) Microplastics in the marine environment: distribution, interactions and effects. In: Bergmann, M., Gutow, L., Klages, M. (Eds.), Marine AnthropogenicLitter. Springer, Berlin, pp. 245–308
Lusher A, Tirelli V, O’Connor I, Officer R (2015) Microplastics in Arctic polar waters: the first reported values of particles in surface and sub-surface samples. Sci Rep 5:14947. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14947
Lwanga HE, Gertsen H, Gooren H, Peters P, Salánki T, Van Der Ploeg M, Besseling E, Koelmans AA, Geissen V (2016) Microplastics in the terrestrial ecosystem: implications for Lumbricus terrestris (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae). Environ Sci Technol 50(5):2685–2691. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05478
Machado AS, Kloas W, Zarfl C, Hempel S, Rillig M (2018) Microplastics as an emerging threat to terrestrial ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 24:1405–1416. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14020
MacIvor JS, Moore AE (2013) Bees collect polyurethane and polyethylene plastics as novel nest materials. Ecosphere 4(12):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00308.1
Muhammad A, Zhou X, He J, Zhang N, Shen X, Sun C, Yan B, Shao Y (2021) Toxic effects of acute exposure to polystyrene microplastics and nanoplastics on the model insect, silkworm Bombyx mori. Environ Pollut. 285, 117255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117255
Murray F, Cowie PR (2011) Plastic contamination in the decapod crustacean Nephrops norvegicus (Linnaeus, 1758) Marine Pollut Bull, 62, 1207–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.03.032
Naggar YAL, Sayes CM, Collom C, Ayorinde T, Qi S, El-Seedi HR, Paxton RJ, Wang K (2023) Chronic exposure to polystyrene microplastic fragments has no effect on honeybee survival, but reduces feeding rate and body weight. Toxics 11(2):100. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11020100
Ng E-L, Lwanga EH, Eldridge SM, Johnston P, Hu H-W, Geissen V, Chen D (2018) An overview of microplastic and nanoplastic pollution in agroecosystems Science of Total. Environment 627:1377–1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.341
Nizzetto L, Futter M, Langaas S (2016) Are agricultural soils dumps for microplastics of urban origin? Environ Sci Technol 50:10777–10779. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04140
Obbard RW, Sadri S, Wong YQ, Khitun AA, Baker I, Thompson RC (2014) Global warming releases microplastic legacy frozen in Arctic Sea ice. Earth’s Future. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014EF000240
Ogonowski M, Schür C, Jarsén Å, Gorokhova E (2016) The effects of natural and anthropogenic microparticles on individual fitness in Daphnia magna. PloS one. 13;11(5):e0155063. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155063
Peters W (2012) Peritrophic membranes (Vol. 30). Springer Science & Business Media
Prezoto F, Maciel TT, Detoni M, Mayorquin AZ, Barbosa BC (2019) Pest control potential of social wasps in small farms and urban gardens. Insects 10(7):192. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10070192
Puskic PS, Lavers JL, Bond AL (2020) A critical review of harm associated with plastic ingestion on vertebrates. Sci Total Environ 743:140666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140666
Quintos-Andrade G, Torres F, Vivyan P (2021) Observación de Megachile saulcyi (Guérin-Méneville, 1844) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) utilizando plástico para la construcción de nidos en Chile. Revista chilena de entomologia, 47(2), 201–204. https://doi.org/10.35249/rche.47.2.21.04
R CoreTeam, 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna. R version 4.0. 0
Richter MR (2000) Social wasp (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) foraging behavior. Annu Rev Entomol 45(1):121–150. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.121
Rondoni G, Chierici E, Agnelli A, Conti E (2021) Microplastics alter behavioural responses of an insect herbivore to a plant-soil system. Sci Total Environ 787:147716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147716
Ryan MG, Watkins L, Walter MT (2019) Hudson River juvenile Blueback herring avoid ingesting microplastics. Mar Pollut Bull 146:935–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.07.004
Saborowski R, Paulischkis E, Gutow L (2019) How to get rid of ingested microplastic fibers? A straightforward approach of the Atlantic ditch shrimp Palaemon varians. Environ Pollut 254:113068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113068
Santana, M.F.M., Moreira, F.T., Pereira, C.D.S., Abessa, D.M.S., & Turra, A. (2018). Continuous exposure to microplastics does not cause physiological effects in the cultivated mussel Perna perna. Archives of Environmental Contamination Toxicology. 74, 594e604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-018-0504-3
Skaldina O, Łukowski A, Leskinen JT, Koistinen AP, Eeva T (2023) Mobile samplers of particulate matter–Flying omnivorous insects in detection of industrial contamination. Sci Total Environ 161511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161511
Song Y, Cao C, Qiu R, Hu J, Liu M, Lu S, Shi H, Raley-Susman KM, He D (2019) Uptake and adverse effects of polyethylene terephthalate microplastics fibers on terrestrial snails (Achatina fulica) after soil exposure. Environ Pollut 250:447–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.04.066
Southon RJ, Fernandes OA, Nascimento FS, Sumner S (2019) Social wasps are effective biocontrol agents of key lepidopteran crop pests. Proc R Soc B 286(1914):20191676. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1676
Spradbery JP (1973) Wasps: an account of the biology and natural history of solitary and social wasps. Sidwick & Jackson, London XVI + 408 pp.
Sussarellu R, Suquet M, Thomas Y, Lambert C, Fabioux C, Pernet MEJ, Le Goïc N, Quillien V, Mingant C, Epelboin Y, Corporeau C, Guyomarch J, Robbens J, Paul-Pont I, Soudant P, Huvet A (2016) Oyster reproduction is affected by exposure to polystyrene microplastics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:2430–2435. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1519019113
Tubau X, Canals M, Lastras G, Rayo X, Rivera J, Amblas D (2015) Marine litter on the floor of deep submarine canyons of the north-western Mediterranean sea: the role of hydrodynamic processes. Prog Oceanogr 134:379–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2015.03.013
Ugolini A, Ungherese G, Ciofini M, Lapucci A, Camaiti M (2013) Microplastic debris in sandhoppers. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 129:19–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2013.05.026
Urbini A, Sparvoli E, Turillazzi S (2006) Social paper wasps as bioindicators: a preliminary research with Polistes dominulus (Hymenoptera Vespidae) as a trace metal accumulator. Chemosphere 64(5):697–703
Wang K, Li J, Zhao L, Mu X, Wang C, Wang M, Xue X, Qi S, Wu L (2021) Gut microbiota protects honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) against polystyrene microplastics exposure risks. Jounal of Hazardous Materials 402, 23828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123828
Watts AJ, Urbina MA, Goodhead R, Moger J, Lewis C, Galloway TS (2016) Effect of microplastic on the gills of the shore crab Carcinus maenas. Environ Sci Technol 50(10):5364–5369. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01187
Weber A, Scherer C, Brennholt N, Reifferscheid G, Wagner M (2018) PET microplastics do not negatively affect the survival, development, metabolism and feeding activity of the freshwater invertebrate Gammarus pulex. Environ Pollut. 234, 181e189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.014
Wen X, Du C, Xu P, Zeng G, Huang D, Yin L, Yin K, Hu L, Wan J, Zhang J, Tan S, Deng R (2018) Microplastic pollution in surface sediments of urban water areas in Changsha, China: abundance, composition, surface textures. Mar Pollut Bull 136:414–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.09.043
Wilson JS, Jones SI, McCleve S, Carril OM (2020) Evidence of leaf-cutter bees using plastic flagging as nesting material. Matters 6(10):e202010000003
Wright SL, Rowe D, Thompson RC, Galloway TS (2013) Microplastic ingestion decreases energy reserves in marine worms. Curr Biol 23(23):R1031–R1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.068
Wu Q, Tao H, Wong MH (2019) Feeding and metabolism effects of three common microplastics on Tenebrio molitor L. Environ Geochem Health 41(1):17–26
Xu J, Rodríguez-Torres R, Rist S, Nielsen TG, Hartmann NB, Brun P, Li D, Almeda R (2022) Unpalatable Plastic: Efficient taste discrimination of microplastics in planktonic copepods. Environ Sci Technol 56:6455–6465. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c00322
Xu C, Zhang B, Gu C, Shen C, Yin S, Aamir M, Li F (2020) Are we underestimating the sources of microplastic pollution in terrestrial environment? J Hazard Mater 400:123228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123228
Yang L, Zhang Y, Kang S, Wang Z, Wu C (2021) Microplastics in freshwater sediment: A review on methods, occurrence, and sources. Sci Total Environ 754:141948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141948
Yin L, Chen B, Xia B, Shi X, Qu K (2018) Polystyrene microplastics alter the behavior, energy reserve and nutritional composition of marine jacopever (Sebastes schlegelii). J Hazard Mater 360:97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.07.110
Acknowledgements
We thank to Joel José Gonçalves, Vera Lúcia de Faria, André Faria Gonçalves for their help in wasp collection and transport, as well as Raquel Marques and Ingrid Sousa for laboratory assistance.
Funding
This work was supported by: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Capes Print program [grant number 88887.571161/2020–00 to MAPL]; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, CNPq [grant number 301725/2019–5 to GM, 142206/2017–2 and 301725/2019–5 to RCB, 140599/2018–5 and 150813/2022–8 to TAV]; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais, FAPEMIG [to WFB]; and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, FAPESP [grant number 2020/14464–2 to ARS, 2021/05598–8 to FSN].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Gustavo Ferreira Martins; writing the original draft: all authors; data curation: André Rodrigues de Souza; funding acquisition: André Rodrigues de Souza, Maria Augusta P. Lima, Fábio Santos do nascimento and Gustavo Ferreira Martins; investigation: André Rodrigues de Souza, Thaís Andrade Viana and Gustavo Ferreira Martins; statistical analyses: Rodrigo Cupertino Bernardes and Wagner Faria Barbosa.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
Not applicable.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent to Publish
All authors consent to publish this manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Giovanni Benelli
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Rodrigues de Souza, A., Bernardes, R.C., Barbosa, W.F. et al. Ingestion of polystyrene microparticles impairs survival and defecation in larvae of Polistes satan (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 58527–58535 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26695-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26695-x