Introduction

Freshwater ecosystems are affected by a large number of human activities pesticides, nutrients, etc. that lead to water pollution (Malaj et al. 2014; Sarriquet et al. 2006; UNEP 2010; Vörösmarty et al. 2010; Münze et al. 2015). Pesticides used in agriculture are chemical substances or biological substances which produced to prevent the growth of pest animals and plants to repel these harms or to reduce the number of these harms (US Environmental Protection Agency 2007; Uğurlu et al. 2015). Pesticides applications for plant protection was contaminated to water ecosystems to via surface waters (Iwakuma et al. 1993), drainage (Bennett et al. 2005) drifting with precipitation (Schulz et al. 2001; Bundschuh et al. 2013).

Organophosphorus (OP) insecticides have been replaced by organochlorine pesticides due to their rapid degradation in the water and low environmental persistence (Lundebye et al. 1997). However, their widespread use has resulted in high pollution risks for water environments (Gabrielides 1995). Dimethoate is a dithiophosphate insecticide with a wide range of applications worldwide in various fruits and vegetables and various products (Hassall 1990; Sorensen et al. 1995).

Reactive oxygen species (ROS), the antioxidant system, induce oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, and oxidation of proteins during metabolism (Sturve et al. 2008; Almroth et al. 2008; Tatar et al. 2018). There is an important balance between the production of ROS and the removal of antioxidant defense systems by organisms. ROS are scavenged by antioxidant enzymes and non-enzymatic antioxidants (Hermes-Lima 2004; Halliwell and Gutteridge 2007; Serdar et al. 2018). Lipid peroxidation is a chain reaction in which oxidants break down membrane phospholipids with polyunsaturated fatty acids. Lipid peroxidation causes damage to bio-membranes, which can lead to significant consequences for living organisms (Hermes-Lima 2004; Jemec et al. 2012; Serdar et al. 2018). The reactive aldehydes produced during lipid peroxidation can spread from the production site damage intracellular targets (Esterbauer et al. 1990). The induction of high ROS production can lead to oxidative damage to important cellular macromolecules (lipids, proteins, nucleic acids, etc.) (Bergamini et al. 2004; Yonar and Sakin 2011). Glutathione (GSH) is an important antioxidant that acts as a direct scavenger of oxidants as well as an antioxidant enzyme substrate (Della et al. 1994; Ferrari et al. 2007). Depletion leads to an imbalance in the redox state and the ability to cope with organic xenobiotics metabolized by glutathione S-transferase (GST) and glutathione peroxidases (GPx). The biological role of superoxide dismutase (SOD) antioxidant defense is to defend cells against the toxic effects of O2 by catalyzing dismutation reactions (Prasad 2004). Aerobic organisms have an antioxidant defense system against various stress factors (Sies 1986). GPx reduces reactive lipid hydroperoxides to prevent malondialdehyde (MDA) formation (Flohe 1989; Vijayavel et al. 2004; Tatar et al. 2018). An increase in the catalase (CAT) and the SOD activity is generally observed in response to environmental pollutants since the first defense line against the oxidative stress represents the SOD-CAT system (McCord 1996).

Assessments of the biomarkers as an early warning of adverse changes and damage have been shown to be a suitable tool in G. pulex. Environmental pollutions such as pesticide possibly play a role in the generation of oxidative stress in cells (Dat et al. 2000; Achary et al. 2008; Yildirim et al. 2018).

Crustaceans are used as bioindicators in most aquatic ecosystems (Rinderhagen et al. 2000). With their abundance in fresh water, their high ecological relevance, and their important role in the food chain, the amphipods of the gammarus genus are often used in ecotoxicological studies (Kunz et al. 2010; Adam et al. 2010; Serdar et al. 2018). Among freshwater species, Gammarus sp. is a suitable organism for ecotoxicological assessment of environmental pollutants at a large scale, mostly because gammarid are present in most river in Europe (Jażdżewski 1980). Gammarids are known to be sensitive to pollutants and can easily be used for laboratory and field studies (Kunz et al. 2010). Hence, many ecotoxicological studies were carried out using gammarids to evaluate toxic impact of xenobiotics (Sornom et al. 2010; Khan et al. 2011; Sroda and Cossu-Leguille 2011; Gismondi et al. 2012). Bioassays and biomarkers have attracted much attention since they are an attractive alternative to chemical determinations and complementary to the assessment of the environmental impacts of wastes (Petala et al. 2009). One of the methods to determine pollution in the aquatic environment is to determine the effects of the environment on aquatic organisms.

This present study addressed the changes on some oxidative stress biomarkers in G. pulex exposed to sub-lethal concentrations of dimethoate. For this purpose, antioxidant enzyme activities like SOD, GPx, GST, and CAT as well as level of MDA linked to lipid peroxidation and non-enzymatic parameter GSH level were measured as biomarkers of biochemical responses of non-target organisms exposed to dimethoate.

Material methods

Organisms for experimental procedure were collected with handnets (kick sample) in the Munzur River (39.156820 N, 39.499640 E) in Tunceli, Turkey (Fig. 1). The organisms were then transferred to laboratory in a ventilated plastic container. Organisms were stored in an 80-L aquarium, which oxygenated with air pump in a room controlled by air condition at 18 °C±0.5 temperature and 12:12 h light-dark circles in laboratory conditions. Willow leaves used for fed of organisms. They were at least 15 days to this adaption conditions before they were used for experiments. Organisms are similar, healthy, active, and adult male individuals (W=0.0314±0.0076 g; L=10.23±0.55 mm) were selected for the study (De Lange et al. 2006). The organisms were checked per 24 h.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Area where G. pulex organisms are collected (URL-1 2018)

Acute toxicity (LC50)

Static non-renewal tests were used in this study (Weber 1991), after the interval was determined, organisms were exposed to different dimethoate concentrations (0 (control), 20, 40, 80, 160, and 320 μg L−1 dimethoate). At all stages of the LC50 experiment, ten organisms were exposed to dimethoate concentrations determined in 1-L glass aquariums. Organisms did not feed during the 96-h LC50 trials. Organisms were checked per 24 h. Dead individuals were counted and removed from the experimental environment. Inactive organisms were considered dead.

LC50 experiments were repeated three times. The obtained data were calculated by probit analysis and LC50 values were determined for 96 h (Weber 1991).

Experimental design

The experimental study was designed into four groups:

  1. Group 1;

    (Control (C)), not contained in the concentration of dimethoate, kept in the water taken from the natural environment of organisms.

  2. Group 2;

    (D1) was applied 10 μg/L concentration of dimethoate, about 1/16 of LC50 concentration.

  3. Group 3;

    (D2) was applied 20 μg/L concentration of dimethoate, about 1/8 of LC50 concentration.

  4. Group 4;

    (D3) was applied 40 μg/L concentration of dimethoate, about 1/4 of the LC50 concentration.

The living beings used in the study were selected from similar sized and healthy individuals (De Lange et al. 2006). The study was repeated three times. Ten organisms were used in each 1-L aquarium. Two time groups (24 and 96 h) for four groups and a total of 240 organisms were used in three subletal dimethoate groups.

Biochemical analyses

The samples were weighed and homogenized by adding PBS buffer (salt solution buffered with phosphate) at a rate of 1/5 w/v and using a homogenizer with ice to measure antioxidant parameters. The samples were centrifuged at 17,000 rpm for 15 min; the supernatants were kept in deep freeze at −70 °C until their measurements were done. The concentration of GSH was performed by the method of Beutler et al. (1963) and expressed as nanomoles per gram tissue. MDA level, SOD, CAT, and GPx activities were conducted by using ELISA kit. The activities of SOD, CAT, and GPx were determined by ELISA kits (catalog numbers, CAT 707002, SOD 706002, and GPx 703102) purchased from the CAYMAN Chemical Company.

Statistical analysis

In this study, the LC50 value has been calculated using probit analysis. The SPSS 24.0 package program one-way ANOVA (Duncan 0.05) has been used for the evaluation of biochemical analyzes.

Results

Acute toxicity (LC50) value

In this study, the average of the LC50 value of G. pulex, exposed to three repetitive dimethoate pesticides, was found to be 167 μg L−1.

The GSH levels

The GSH levels were significantly reduced in D1, D2, and D3 groups at 24 and 96 h compared to the control group (p>0.05; Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

GSH (nmol/g tissue) levels of G. pulex exposed to dimethoate. The different letters of the bar are statistically significant (p<0.05)

The MDA levels

The MDA levels were significantly increased in D1, D2, and D3 groups at 24 and 96 h compared to the control group (p>0.05) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

MDA (nmol/g tissue) levels of G. pulex exposed to dimethoate. The different letters of the bar are statistically significant (p<0.05)

The SOD activity

The SOD enzyme activity was found to be statistically significantly reduced in the D1 and D2 groups compared to that the control group at 24 h (p<0.05). At the 96 h, the SOD enzyme activity was found to be statistically significantly reduced (p<0.05) in the D3 group compared to that in the control group (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

SOD (U/mL) activities of G. pulex exposed to dimethoate. The different letters of the bar are statistically significant (p<0.05)

The GPx activity

The GPx enzyme activity was not statistically significantly reduced in D1, D2, and D3 groups compared to that in the control group (p>0.05). At the 96 h, the GPx enzyme activity was found to be statistically significantly reduced (p<0.05) in the D3 group compared to that in the control group (p<0.05) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

GPx (nmol/min/mL) activities of G. pulex exposed to dimethoate. The different letters of the bar are statistically significant (p<0.05)

The GST activity

The GST enzyme activity was found to be statistically significantly reduced (p<0.05) in the D3 group compared to that in the control group at 24 h. At the 96 h, the GST enzyme activity was not statistically significantly reduced (p>0.05) in D1, D2, and D3 groups compared to that in the control group (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

GST (U/mL) activities of G. pulex exposed to dimethoate. The different letters of the bar are statistically significant (p<0.05)

The CAT enzyme activity

The CAT enzyme activity was found to be statistically significantly reduced (p<0.05) in the D3 group compared to that in the control group at 24 h. At the 96 h, the CAT enzyme activity was statistically significantly reduced in D1, D2, and D3 groups compared to that in the control group (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

CAT (nmol/min/mL) activities of G. pulex exposed to dimethoate. The different letters of the bar are statistically significant (p<0.05)

Discussion

GSH; MDA levels; and SOD, GPX, GST, and CAT enzyme activities of G. pulex exposed to dimethoate pesticide for 24 and 96 h were determined. The present study demonstrates that dimethoate pesticides cause to oxidative stress in G. pulex.

The GSH, an important component of antioxidant defense, is a non-enzymatic scavenger. Glutathione reacts with free radicals and peroxides and protects the cells against oxidative damage (Meister and Anderson 1983). GSH levels in organisms exposed to dimethoate pesticide decreased in both 24 and 96 h compared to the control group. Similarly to this study, a decrease in GSH content produced by anticholinesterase agents has also been reported in diverse aquatic organisms (Venturino et al. 2001; Hai et al. 1997a, b; Della et al. 1994; Ferrari et al. 2007; Serdar et al. 2018; Yildirim et al. 2018). GSH depletion has been associated with oxidation of glutathione peroxidases due to an increase in free radicals and/or the direct oxidation of these compounds (Hai et al. 1997a, b; Almar et al. 1998; Ferrari et al. 2007). In addition, the decrease in GSH content may be associated with its role as a GST substrate in detoxification reactions.

Lipid peroxidation, considered as a valuable indicator of oxidative damage of cellular components known as the first step in cellular membrane damage, is caused by pesticides, metals, and other xenobiotics (Gamble et al. 1995; Regoli et al. 1998). It is likely that most components of cellular structure and function are potentially oxidative damage targets, and the most susceptible substrates for auto-oxidation are polyunsaturated fatty acids of the cell membrane undergoing rapid eradication. Considering that the typical reaction during ROS-induced damage involves the peroxidation of unsaturated fatty acids, our results clearly showed that dimethoate exposure for 24 and 96 h led to oxidative stress, with significant increases of MDA values in organisms when compared to the control group. In this study, increased hydroperoxide lipid production suggests that ROS-induced oxidative damage may be one of the main toxic effects of dimethoate. It has been reported that MDA can be induced by various environmental pollutants in studies conducted on various aquatic organisms (Ploch et al. 1999; Ahmad et al. 2000; Wilhelm Filho and Marcon 1996; Oakes and Van der Kraak 2003; Oakes et al. 2004; Mensah et al. 2012; Yildirim et al. 2018). However, in the D1 group (lowest concentration) at 96 h, MDA level was found to be the highest. Similarly, Oliveira et al. (2013) observed the same effect in the shrimp Palaemon serratus which exposed to fenitrothion. In another study, Lavarías and García (2015) Macrobrachium borellii in organophosphate fenitrothion exposure were similar results. For these results, the probability of increased of the level of MDA in the concentration said in this study may be that CAT activities were inhibited at 96 h of dimethoate exposure.

The SOD, which is a group of metalloenzymes, is a primary defense against the toxic effects of superoxide radicals in aerobic organisms and catalyzes the transformation of superoxide radicals to H2O2 and O2, which play an important role in the antioxidant system (Kappus 1985; Kohen and Nyska 2002; Yonar and Sakin 2011). It is not a general rule that an increase in xenobiotic concentrations induces antioxidant activity (Cheung et al. 2001). In some cases, O2 by itself or after its transformation to H2O2 causes a strong oxidation of the cysteine in the enzyme and decrease the SOD activity (Dimitrova et al. 1994; Durmaz et al. 2006). In the presence of xenobiotic, an initial decreased response in the antioxidant system may be followed by an induction. Thus, the existence of an inducible antioxidant system may reflect an adaptation of organism (Doyotte et al. 1997; Oruç and Usta 2007). The response of antioxidant system to oxidative stress in various tissues shows differences from one species to another due to the differences in antioxidant potential of these tissues (Ahmad et al. 2000; Oruç and Usta 2007). In this study, SOD activity has been decreased after dimethoate exposure in G. pulex. Similar to this study, studies have reported that SOD activity is also reduced in some aquatic organisms exposed to various pollutants (Durmaz et al. 2006; Tatar et al. 2018; Serdar et al. 2018).

The GPx, considered as a protective enzyme against lipid peroxidation at the expense of GSH, catalyzes the reduction of hydrogen peroxide and lipid peroxides (Moreno et al. 2005). Monteiro et al. (2006) have shown that the activity of this enzyme is reduced by negative feedback resulting from the excess of the substrate or the damage caused by the oxidative modification. Inhibition of the GPx activity may reflect the failure of the antioxidant system in contact with pesticides (Ballesteros et al. 2009) or may be related to the direct effect of superoxide radicals or pesticides on enzyme synthesis (Bainy et al. 1993; Yonar et al. 2014). The GPx activity in G. pulex exposed to dimethoate is significantly lower than that obtained for control organisms in this study. This reduction may show that the antioxidant capacity is exceeded by the amount of hydroperoxide product synthesized through lipid peroxidation (Remacle et al. 1992). In this context, the GPx inhibition observed in the present study might reflect a possible antioxidant defense failure responsible for the observed increase in MDA levels. Similar to the present study, many studies have reported that GPx activity is triggered by pollutants (Oliveira et al. 2012; Tatar et al. 2018; Almeida et al. 2002; Sayeed et al. 2003; Zhang et al. 2004; Fatima et al. 2000).

The GSTs are a family of enzymes that play an important role in the biotransformation of endogenous substances of the xenobiotics. GSTs function in both antioxidant and detoxification processes, catalyzing the conjugation of various electrophilic compounds with glutathione and convert these compounds to water soluble compounds (Osten et al. 2005; Yildirim et al. 2018). Increased GST activity may indicate the development of a defensive mechanism to counteract the effects of exposure and may reflect the possibility of a more efficient protection against pesticide toxicity. In this study, GST enzyme activity in freshwater amphipod G. pulex decreased with pesticide exposure in only high concentration group in 24 h. In the present study, GST activity was inhibited, suggesting the failure of adaptive response and indicating an oxidative stress status in the organisms or may indicate that the high concentration pesticide induces interactions leading to greater toxicity and thus induction of the GST enzyme. Similarly to the present study, GST activity has been reported to decrease in various aquatic organisms exposed to pollutants (Yildirim et al. 2018; Demirci et al. 2018; Mosleh et al. 2005; Hamed et al. 1999).

The CAT is a very common enzyme found in virtually all living organisms that use oxygen. It acts in water and oxygen formation by catalyzing the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide (Chelikani et al. 2004). CAT activity may increase or decrease in contaminated environments depending on the substance (Sobjak et al. 2017). In this study, the CAT enzyme activity is inhibited by the organisms under stress with dimethoate exposure. Similar to the present study, decreases in CAT activity have been reported in aquatic organisms exposed to various pollutants (Thomas and Murthy 1976; Hasspieler et al. 1994; Sayeed et al. 2003; Zhang et al. 2004; Crestani et al. 2007; Yildirim et al. 2018). According to the results found in the literature related to the activity of this enzyme, potential antioxidant changes by species, habitat, etc. can be explained (Glusczak et al. 2007).

Conclusion

The increased use of dimethoate pesticide increases the risk of environmental contamination with toxic effects on non-target organisms in aquatic ecosystems. In this study, MDA, GSH levels, GPx, SOD, GST, and CAT enzyme activities of oxidative stress parameters were determined on G. pulex of dimethoate pesticide. In this study, it can be concluded that stress condition provided by dimethoate exposure at sublethal concentrations evoked specific responses in G. pulex. Therefore, the above results indicate that dimethoate, an environmental pollutant, shows toxic effects due to oxidative stress.