Introduction

Chloro-substituted benzonitriles are important chemical intermediates for the synthesis of various value-added chemicals such as herbicides [1], pesticides, pharmaceuticals [2], and so on. The preparation of these benzonitriles via a catalytic ammoxidation process is of particular interest [3]. Vanadium oxides (VOx) are efficient catalysts for ammoxidation reactions due to their redox property and acidity, and VOx based catalysts have been widely used in research and industry [4]. Usually, the performance of VOx catalysts can be improved by adding other components (e.g., P, Cr, Ti, Mo, or Sb) and various mixed oxide ammoxidation catalysts have been designed [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. It is usually accepted that the ammoxidation reaction follows a bifunctional catalysis mechanism [16], of which requires redox and acidic sites simultaneously. Cr can act as an effective promoter and V–Cr–O based composite oxides are known to be highly efficient catalysts for selective gas-phase ammoxidation of chloro-substituted toluenes. Our group focuses on developing V–Cr–O composite oxide catalysts with high activity of ammoxidation reactions [8,9,10]. Nano- or microsized V–Cr–O catalysts have been prepared by several methods such as solid-state reaction [5], co-precipitation [6], hydrothermal [7,8,9], and solvothermal routes [10]. It was found that monoclinic CrVO4 had higher catalytic activity than orthorhombic CrVO4, monoclinic Cr2V4O13, and Cr2O3-V2O5 mixed oxides [8]. However, high-cost and low-strength restricted their use in fluid-bed reactors. Supported V–Cr–O catalysts usually have better catalytic activity than unsupported ones due to controllable catalyst textures, large surface area, high mechanical strength, and heat transfer capacity. Supported catalysts were usually prepared via a wetness impregnation process. Active components were dispersed on the surface of carrier. However, the surface of catalyst could be severely weared and teared in a fluidized bed reactor, resulting in a rapid inactivation. Spray-drying method has the characteristics of fast heat transfer, large evaporation rate, short drying time, and low equipment cost [17]. Comparing with the impregnation method, the spray-drying process is known to be simple, low cost, reliable, and easy to control the particle size and morphology [18,19,20,21]. During the spray-drying process, binders such as silica and alumina sols played a role in cross-linking among catalyst particles. The developed catalysts exhibited a fluidizable microspherical shape and strong mechanical strength [22, 23]. In addition, the type and content of inorganic binders were essential in determining the inner structure of catalysts, which directly affected the catalytic performance. As supported catalysts were fabricated using spray-drying method, active components were dispersed on the surface and inner of carriers [24, 25]. Surface wear and tear exposed inner active components and the catalytic activity remained. Very recently, silica supported V–Cr–O catalyst reported by us was prepared via spray drying [26]. It was found that 1:1 molar ratio of Cr/V resulted in the formation of monoclinic CrVO4 phase, which exhibited the best catalytic performance for ammoxidation of para-chlorotoluene. In this process, silica binder was also used as a support material, helping to increase the catalyst’s mechanical strength, to maintain the chemical and physical stability, and to lower production cost. However, the structural aspects of supported monoclinic CrVO4 catalysts with different silica dosages were not reported. Meanwhile, the effect of silica dosage on the catalytic behavior of CrVO4/SiO2 catalysts was imperceptible. Increasing the silica dosage could modify the surface structure [27, 28], change heat and oxygen transfer capacity [29], and lessen the content of active metal oxides. Therefore, a systematic investigation should be processed to optimize the silica dosage for better catalytic performance.

In the present work, CrVO4/SiO2 catalysts with different metal oxide contents were prepared via spray-drying method. The catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), polarized light microscope (PLM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and hydrogen temperature programmed reduction (H2-TPR). In addition, the activities of the spray-dried CrVO4/SiO2 catalysts with different metal oxide loads were examined for ammoxidation reaction.

Materials and methods

Catalyst preparation

CrVO4/SiO2 catalysts were prepared by spray-drying method. The following precursors were used for the preparation of CrVO4/SiO2 catalysts: V2O5 (Aladdin, 99%), CrO3 (Aladdin, 99%), oxalic acid (Aladdin, 99%), and colloidal silica (Sigma-Aldrich, 30 wt% SiO2, 0.6 wt% Na2O, particle size 16 nm). Appropriate amount of H2C2O4·2H2O was dissolved in deionized water. V2O5 and CrO3 with a molar ratio of 1: 2 were added in sequence under vigorous stirring, forming a homogeneous mixture. After adding a certain volume of colloidal silica to the above solution, the resulting mixture was spray-dried at 180 °C in a centrifugal spray dryer. The spray-dried powder was heated at 300 °C for 2 h in a box furnace and then calcined at 550 °C for 4 h. The obtained CrVO4/SiO2 catalysts were labeled as Cat-MOx, where x represents the weight contents of metal oxides in the synthetic catalysts and x = 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, and 100%.

The CrVO4/SiO2 catalyst with 20% content of metal oxides was prepared for comparison through wetness impregnation method, in which silica was used as support. The obtained catalyst was named as Cat-PTVCrO.

Catalyst characterization

The morphology of Cat-MOx catalysts was investigated with polarizing microscopy (Polarizing Microscope Axioskoppo, Zeiss, Germany). The particle size distribution profile was determined with a particle size distribution analyzer (Zetasizer Nano ZS90, Malvern, UK). Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Bruker Advanced D8 X-ray diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å) operating at 40 kV and 40 mA. Data were recorded in the range of 2θ = 10 − 90° with a scan step width of 0.0163°. Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR) were measured using a NEXUS470 FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Nicolet, USA) following the KBr pellet method. Nitrogen adsorption experiments were performed at − 196 °C using a JW-BK132F gas adsorption analyzer. Before the measurement, the samples were degassed at 200 °C for 4 h. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were obtained using a MULTILAB2000 X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (VG, USA) with an Al Kα X-ray beam as the excitation source. The binding energies (BE) were calibrated against the C 1 s peak at 284.6 eV. Temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) experiments were carried out on an AMI-200 Catalyst Multifunctional Characterization Analyzer (Zeton Altimira, USA).

Catalytic performance

Chlorotoluene ammoxidation runs were performed in a fixed-bed reactor, which was made of a Pyrex glass tube (about 500 mm in length and 30 mm in inner diameter). The tube was heated in an electric furnace. About 20 g of catalyst was loaded in the middle of the tube reactor. Both NH3 and air were quantified using gas flow meters. Chlorotoluenes were injected into a vaporizer through a micropump, mixed with air and NH3, and then fed into the reactor. The product was collected behind the reactor and was dissolved in ethanol. All the soluble products and unconverted reactants were analyzed by a Shimadzu GC-2010 Plus gas chromatography using a capillary column and an FID detector. A PEG-20 M capillary column (15 m × 0.25 mm, i.d., 0.25 mm film thickness, Lanzhou Atech Technologies Co. Ltd. China) was employed for separation. All the analysis were conducted under the following conditions: N2 (99.999%) was used as carrier gas, injection port, the capillary column, and the detector at 250, 80, and 270 °C, respectively. The conversion of para-chlorotoluene (PCT), the yield and selectivity of para-chlorobenzonitrile (PCBN) could be determined by:

$$ {\text{PCT Conversion}}\left( \% \right) = \left[ {1 - n\left( {{\text{PCT}}} \right)_{{{\text{outlet}}}} /n\left( {{\text{PCT}}} \right)_{{{\text{inlet}}}} } \right] \times 100 $$
(1)
$$ {\text{PCBN Molar Yield}}\left( \% \right) = \left[ {n\left( {{\text{PCBN}}} \right)_{{{\text{obtained}}}} /n\left( {{\text{PCT}}} \right)_{{{\text{inlet}}}} } \right] \times 100 $$
(2)
$$ {\text{PCBN Selectivity}}\left( \% \right) = \left[ {{\text{Conversion}}/{\text{Molar }}E} \right] \times 100 $$
(3)

Results and discussion

Optical microscope

The size and morphology of Cat-MOx particles were witnessed via an optical microscope. The magnification was 200 × and the scale length was 100 μm. Light micrographs of Cat-MOx particles are shown in Fig. 1. Cat-MOx particles were well dispersed, and no significant aggregations were observed. The particles had spherical shape in the size range from 20 to 80 μm. The particle size decreased with the increase of metal oxide content. Precursors with low SiO2 content comprised high content of oxalates. The precursors with high oxalate content decomposed at high temperature and generated a large amount of gas, leading to the disintegration of spherical particles.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Light micrographs of Cat-MOx (x = 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, and 100) catalysts

Particle size distribution

The particle size distribution (PSD) profiles of spray-dried Cat-MOx catalysts with various metal oxide contents were measured, and the results are shown in Fig. 2 and Table 1. The PSD profiles of Cat-MO20, Cat-MO30, and Cat-MO40 samples featured a wide particle size distribution in the range of 20–120 μm. Cat-MO50 and Cat-MO60 samples exhibited a less wide particle size distribution in the range of 20–80 μm. Unsupported Cat-MO100 sample had a particle size distribution in the range of 10–50 μm. These results indicated that higher metal oxide content led to narrower particle size distributions and smaller diameters.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Particle size distribution of catalysts with different metal oxide contents

Table 1 Particle size characteristics of catalysts with different metal oxide contents

The PSD profiles of Cat-PTVCrO catalyst and the colloidal silica support are presented in Fig. 3. Both the PSD profiles had a particle size distribution in the range of 50–300 μm. The catalyst particles prepared by wetness impregnation method had similar PSD with formed silica carrier. This was probably due to the low loading of metal oxides over colloidal silica.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Particle size distribution of Cat-PTVCrO catalyst and the colloidal silica support

X-ray powder diffraction (XRD)

XRD characterization was performed to check the effect of metal oxide contents on the structure of Cat-MOx catalysts. The XRD patterns of Cat-MOx (x = 20–100) samples are shown in Fig. 4 for comparison. The broad peak around 2θ = 23° corresponded to the amorphous structure of SiO2 support. For the samples of 30 ≤ x ≤ 70, the XRD patterns agreed well with PDF#51-0031, which corresponded to monoclinic CrVO4 [26], and no diffraction peaks of impurity could be observed. The intensities of XRD peaks gradually increased with the increase of x. It was also found that Cat-MO20 and Cat-MO100 samples were indexed to be dominant monoclinic CrVO4 (PDF#51-0031) phase. For the Cat-MO20 sample, diffraction peaks for hexagonal-Cr2O3 (PDF#38-1479) phase were traced, suggested that in the low loading catalyst, the interaction between metal oxide specimen and the silica support could hinder the formation of CrVO4 phase and promote the formation of amorphous V5+ phase and Cr2O3 phase. On the high loading sample, however, the metal oxide species could easily be precipitated next to the silica surface and be aggregated together with the monoclinic CrVO4 phase, due to the relatively weak interaction with the silica support. Compared with standard card of monoclinic CrVO4, the XRD pattern of Cat-MO100 appeared weak miscellaneous peaks around 24.296°, 26.223°, 32.053°, 35.684°, 36.440°, and 64.171°, which could be ascribed to orthorhombic CrVO4 (PDF#38-1376). For the Cat-PTVCrO sample, the possible CrVO4 phase was not formed, and instead, only the hexagonal-Cr2O3 phase appeared. Cat-PTVCrO was prepared via an incipient wetness impregnation method with a low vanadium-chromium loading. This result suggested that the supported V–Cr–O component was mostly in amorphous form.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Powder XRD patterns of Cat-MOx (x = 20–100) and Cat-PTVCrO

Fourier transform IR spectra (FT-IR)

FT-IR spectroscopy was used to verify the change in the skeletal structures of SiO2 resulting from loading the metal oxides. The FT-IR spectra of Cat-MOx (x = 20, 50, and 60) samples are shown in Fig. 5. In the fingerprint region, there are one absorption band at 956 cm−1 attributed to V5+ = O bond stretching, two absorption bands at 869 and 548 cm−1 assigned to V–O–V bending vibration and stretching vibration, and two bands at 1250 and 654 cm−1 due to the vibrations of Cr–O–Cr and Cr–O. The band peaked at 1116 cm−1 was related to the antisymmetric stretching vibration of Si–O-Si [30], suggesting that the skeletal structures of SiO2 were not damaged as the metal oxides were loaded.

Fig. 5
figure 5

FT-IR spectra of Cat-MOx (x = 20, 50, 60) samples

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)

The XPS analysis was carried out to elucidate the chemical states of V, Cr, and O presented in the surface region of Cat-MOx (x = 20–100) samples. The survey XPS spectrum of the Cat-MO50 sample contained the Cr, V, O, Si, and C peaks (Fig. 6a). The C 1 s peak was originated from the organic residues of the XPS instrument itself. The high-resolution Cr 2p spectrum (Fig. 6b) was resolved into two peaks located at 576.6 and 586.6 eV, assigning to the binding energies of Cr 2p 3/2 and Cr 2p 1/2 [31]. The V 2p spectrum (Fig. 6c) exhibits two peaks at 516.6 and 523.2 eV (V 2p1/2 and V 2p3/2) ascribed predominantly to V5+ oxidation state [32]. Additionally, the O 1 s peak could be attributed to the oxygen bonds with Cr or V in the CrVO4 lattice.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Full XPS spectrum of Cat-MO60 (a); Cr 2p3/2 and Cr 2p3/2 XPS spectrum (b); V 2p3/2 and V 2p1/2 XPS spectrum (c); O 1 s XPS spectrum (d)

The high-resolution XPS spectra of Cr and V + O regions are presented in Fig. 7a and b, respectively. The detailed results are summarized in Table 2. The binding energies (BE) of Cr 2p, V 2p, and O 1 s showed no appreciable differences when the metal oxide content was raised from 20 to 100%. The results suggested that oxidation states of Cr and V remained constant. Meanwhile, the surface atomic Cr/V ratios were close to 1:1, which was the nominal value of Cr/V molar ratio in CrVO4, suggesting a well dispersion of metal oxides on the surface of catalysts.

Fig. 7
figure 7

High-resolution XPS spectra of Cr 2p (a), V 2p and O 1 s (b) for the Cat-MOx catalysts with different metal oxide contents (x)

Table 2 XPS results of the Cat-MOx (x = 20–100) samples

BET surface area

BET gas sorptometry measurement was used to investigate the surface area and the porosity nature of Cat-MOx samples. The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms for the Cat-MOx (x = 20, 50, 60, 100) samples are presented in Fig. 8. The data of BET surface area, the average pore volume, and size are given in Table 3. The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms for Cat-MOx samples displayed a type-IV hysteresis loop, characteristic of micro/mesoporous materials [33]. As shown in Table 3, the surface area of the unsupported catalyst (Cat-MO100) was 18.123 m2g−1 and the pore volume was 0.079 cm3 g−1, which were much lower than that of supported Cat-MOx (x = 20, 50, 60) samples. The surface area and pore volume of supported catalyst increased firstly, reached the highest values of 73.574 m2g−1 and 0.267 cm3 g−1 at x = 0.50, and then decreased with increasing CrVO4 loading from x = 20 to 60. However, the pore size was increased continuously from 8.324 to 11.075 nm, as displayed in Table 3. The loaded CrVO4 species could plug the pore mouth, resulting in those pores inaccessible for N2 adsorption and consequently a decrease in the surface area and pore volume. Moreover, some larger pores were formed on the higher loading Cat-MOx sample, due probably to the generation of large volume gas products during thermal decomposition of the oxalate precursor at high temperature. Thus, the contents of SiO2 support and oxalate precursor jointly determined the surface area and porosity of Cat-MOx sample.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of Cat-MOx (x = 20, 50, 60, 100)

Table 3 Pore structure parameters of Cat-MOx catalyst

H 2 -TPR

The H2-TPR profiles of Cat-MOx (x = 20–100) samples are shown in Fig. 9. Pure Cat-MO100 showed one H2 consumption peak at ∼442 °C, which corresponded to the reduction of V5+ to V3+ [34, 35]. The additional SiO2 support significantly modified the reduction profiles and caused a shift in the main reduction peak to higher temperatures, which was certainly due to the interaction between the metal oxides and the SiO2 support.

Fig. 9
figure 9

TPR of Cat-MOx (x = 20, 40, 60, 100) samples

Catalyst activity

Activities of Cat-MOx catalysts were investigated for the vapor-phase ammoxidation of PCT to PCBN. All the reaction conditions including reaction temperature, n(NH3)/n(PCT), n(air)/n(PCT), and loading of metal oxides were assessed in the ammoxidation of PCT over Cat-MO60 catalyst. The influence of reaction temperature on the activity, selectivity, and yield behavior of Cat-MO60 catalysts is shown in Fig. 10a. It was observed that the conversion of PCT increased from 98.5% to almost 100% upon a temperature increase from 380 to 420 °C. The selectivity and yield of PCBN were increased initially and then remained constant upon an increase in the temperature. The maximum selectivity and yield of PCBN observed at 410 C were 87.61% and 87.38%, respectively. The selectivity and yield of PCBN decreased at the reaction temperature higher than 410C due to the thermal decomposition or deep oxidation of PCBN.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Effects of reaction parameters on the performance of Cat-MO60 catalyst: a Reaction load: 0.13 g/gCat·h; n(NH3)/n(PCT) = 1:3; n(air)/n(PCT) = 15. b T = 410C; reaction load: 0.13 g/gCat·h; n(air)/n(PCT) = 15. c T = 410C; Reaction load: 0.13 g/gCat·h; n(NH3)/n(PCT) = 1:3. d T = 410.C; n(NH3)/n(PCT) = 1:3; n(air)/n(PCT) = 15

As shown in Fig. 10b, the molar ratio of n(NH3)/n(PCT) had a pronounced promotion effect on the ammoxidation of PCT. As the n(NH3)/n(PCT) ratio increased from 1 to 3, the conversion of PCT increased initially and then reached maximum at around 99.5%. The selectivity and yield of PCBN had the same trend. On the surface of Cat-MO60 catalyst, increasing the NH3 content led to an increase of M = NH species, which were formed via the condensation reaction between terminal M = O with NH3 along with the loss of water [36]. Further increase in the NH3 content led to a reduction of the O2 supply and a decrease in the yield and selectivity.

The evolution of catalytic behavior as a function of the n(air)/n(PCT) ratio in the range of 11–21 is shown in Fig. 10c. The conversion of PCT kept constant with increasing the n(air)/n(PCT) ratio, while the selectivity and yield of PCBN increased firstly to a maximum at 15 and then decreased. Obviously, high n(air)/n(PCT) ratio was benefit from the recovery of lattice oxygen. However, excess oxygen content might lead to the deep oxidation of PCBN.

The effect of reaction load over Cat-MO60 catalyst bed was studied, and the results are shown in Fig. 10d. With an increase in the reaction load, the conversion of PCT slightly decreased due to a reduction in contact time between the reactant and active sites. Lower reaction load prolonged the contact time, leading to somewhat lower yield and selectivity due to the deep oxidation of PCBN over the catalyst. The best yield and selectivity were obtained at a reaction load of 0.13 g/gCat·h.

As discussed above, the optimal reaction conditions could be determined as follows: T = 410 °C, n(PCT):n(NH3):n(air) = 1:3:15; reaction load = 0.13 g/gCat·h. The activity of Cat-MOx catalysts for the ammoxidation of PCT was evaluated. During the ammoxidation of PCT over these catalysts, PCBN was the desired product and other possible by products, such as benzonitrile, chlorobenzene, and toluene, were not detected. The variation in the catalytic activity was observed with change in the CrVO4 loading in the catalysts, and the results are depicted in Fig. 11. The Cat-MO20 catalyst exhibited only 57.14% conversion of PCT and 43.55% yield of PCBN. When the metal oxides loading increased up to 60 wt%, the conversion of PCT and the yield of PCBN increased up to 99.62% and 86.52%, respectively. However, for Cat-MO100 catalyst, which contains no SiO2 support, the conversion of PCT and the yield of PCBN were with levels of 98.62% and 78.30%, respectively.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Activity of Cat-MOx catalysts for PCT ammoxidation at: T = 410 °C; reaction load: 0.13 g/gCat·h; n(NH3)/n(PCT) = 1:3; n(air)/n(PCT) = 15

Since silica support showed no catalytic activity under the same experimental conditions, the performance measured should be merely attributed to the supported CrVO4 species. Generally, Cat-MO100 showed lower activity than the supported catalyst. The inner CrVO4 species was not accessible in the bulk phase of CrVO4. If the CrVO4 phase was dispersed on the support with high surface area, more active species exposed and the number of available reactive sites increased. On the contrary, in samples supported with high level of SiO2, CrVO4 species could be heavily embedded and only a small amount of CrVO4 species exposed on the surface due to active components and carrier silica dispersed almost uniformly on the surface and inner of catalysts, leading to a decrease of the catalytic activity. As displayed in Fig. 11, the Cat-MO60 catalyst showed the highest PCT conversion and PCBN yield in comparison with the other supported or pure catalysts.

The performance of Cat-PTVCrO catalyst was also tested in the same conditions for comparison, and the results are depicted in Fig. 12. Although the conversion of PCT was close to 100%, both the selectivity and yield of PCBN were obviously below than those obtained over Cat-MO60 catalyst. Furthermore, the reaction load was quite low. All these results suggested that the spray-drying technique showed significant advantages in preparing ammoxidation catalysts.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Activity of Cat-PTVCrO catalysts for PCT ammoxidation

In addition, the catalytic behavior of the Cat-MO60 catalyst was also investigated in the ammoxidation reaction of toluene and other chloro-substituted toluenes such as meta-chlorotoluene (MCT) and ortho-chlorotoluene (OCT), and the results are depicted in Fig. 13 and Table 4. Cat-MO60 catalyst exhibited equally excellent catalytic ability in these reactions. The catalytic behaviors of some reported catalysts are also listed in Table 4. It was obvious that Cat-MO60 catalyst showed improved catalytic performances among the previous reported composite oxide catalysts.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Catalytic activities of Cat-MO60 in the ammoxidation of toluene, PCT, MCT, and OCT

Table 4 Comparison for the ammoxidation of PCT and OCT

Meanwhile, the position of Cl group had an obvious influence on the catalytic activity of ammoxidation reaction. The Cl group had a weak electron-withdrawing effect. The accessibility and reactivity of -CH3 group are dependent on the position of -Cl group. The Cl group in para position had almost no steric hindrance in activating the methyl group. For PCT the process got the highest conversion of PCT and yield of PCBN, but the selectivity was slightly lower than that for toluene due to the deep oxidation of PCBN at high temperature. OCT had the electronic similarity with PCT but more steric hindrance, leading to obviously lower activity. Due to the serious electron-withdrawing effect of Cl substituent in the meta-position, the ammoxidation process exhibited the lowest conversion of MCT and the lowest yield and selectivity of meta-chlorobenzonitrile (MCBN). These results were consisted with that reported previously [37, 39].

Conclusions

We synthesized CrVO4/SiO2 catalysts with different metal oxides content, characterized their physicochemical properties, and conducted ammoxidation reactions. The catalysts were synthesized by spray-drying method, i.e., wet mixing Cr and V precursors with colloidal silica, spray drying the mixture, and calcining at 550 °C for 4 h. The spray-dried CrVO4/SiO2 microspheres were high dispersed with diameter about 20–80 μm. The as-synthesized CrVO4/SiO2 catalysts showed the same monoclinic CrVO4 phase as the weight contents of metal oxides located in the range of 30%-70%. Among them, CrVO4/SiO2 catalysts with metal oxides of 60% exhibited the best performance in PCT ammoxidation reaction. This study may pave the way for the large-scale preparation of supported catalysts used in the vapor-phase ammoxidation reactions.