Abstract
β-Enaminone and its derivatives have emerged among the finest bioactive intermediates. High yields of several β-enaminones (86–97%) are achieved through treatment of substituted aromatic and aliphatic amines with cyclic/acyclic 1,3-diketones, over the magnetically separable cobalt ferrite nanoparticles (CoFe2O4 NPs). The latter was prepared upon co-precipitation. Its purity, fine crystallinity, elemental distributions, morphology, magnetic features, and thermal stability were confirmed by Fourier transform infrared, X-ray diffraction, energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry, scanning electron microscopy, vibrating sample magnetometry, and thermal gravimetric analysis analyses. Thus, CoFe2O4 NPs acted as an excellent green heterogeneous nanocatalyst for synthesis of β-enaminones and gave good recyclability, while showing insignificant loss of their activity.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Bimetallic oxide nanoparticles (NPs) often show synergistic effects in catalyzing modern organic reactions [1,2,3]. They are involved in heterogeneous catalysis, improving the yield, simplification of reaction conditions, economic efficiency, providing high catalytic surface area, easy separation and workup, etc. In addition, the nanosize and magnetic properties of spinel ferrites have made them crucial in science and technology [4]. Nano-cobalt ferrite has attracted much attention because of its large surface-to-volume ratio, high magnetization, and magnetic behavior dependence on its size and shape [5,6,7]. Applications of CoFe2O4 nanocrystals involve environmental remediation, biomedical diagnosis, therapy, high-density magnetic storage, and catalytic innovative synthesis [8,9,10]. β-Enaminones are one of the finest bioactive intermediates. They are used for the synthesis of many important compounds including α,β-amino acids [11, 12], γ-amino alcohol [13], heterocycles [14], alkaloids [15, 16], quinolines [17], azocompounds [18], etc. β-Enaminones are employed as basic synthons for various drugs used as antitumor [19], antiepileptic [20], antibacterial [21, 22], anticonvulsant [23], antitussive [24], anti-inflammatory [25], etc. (Scheme 1).
Numerous procedures have been developed for synthesis of enaminones using different catalysts such as ZrOCl2·8H2O [26], NaAuClO4 [27], Ag NPs [28], Cu NPs [29], Zn(ClO4)2·6H2O [30], Zn(OAc)2·2H2O [31], CeCl3·7H2O [32], ZrCl4 [33], SiO2-sulphuric acid [34], silica-supported Fe(HSO4)3 [35], bimetallic Ag–Cu alloy NPs [36], industrial-quality graphene oxide (IQGO) [37]. Here in continuation of our investigation [38, 39], we describe an economically sound, simple, and efficient protocol for the synthesis of pure β-enaminones, with minimal side-products, through the reaction of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds and amines, using cobalt ferrite NPs as a reusable heterogeneous catalyst under solvent-free conditions (Scheme 2).
Experimental
Materials and physical techniques
All chemical reagents used in our experiments were purchased from Merck or Aldrich Chemical Company with high purity. All solvents were distilled, dried, and purified using standard procedures. Melting points were measured on an Electrothermal 9100 apparatus. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance instrument (DPX 300 MHz and DPX 75 MHz) in pure deuterated dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO-d6) using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal reference. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded using KBr pellets on a Nicolet IR-100 infrared spectrometer. The powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectrum was recorded at room temperature using a Philips X-Pert 1710 diffractometer. The latter appeared with Co Kα (α = 1.79285 Å) with a voltage of 40 kV, a current of 40 mA, and was in the range of 20–80° (2θ) with a scan speed of 0.02 °/s. The particle morphology was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a HITACHI S-4160 scanning electron microscope on gold-coated samples. Magnetic properties were obtained by a vibrating sample magnetometer/alternating gradient force magnetometer (VSM/AGFM, MDK Co., Iran).
Preparation of magnetic CoFe2O4 NPs
Initially, magnetic CoFe2O4 NPs were prepared by chemical co-precipitation of chloride salt of Fe3+ and Co2+ ions with a molar ratio of 2:1. Typically, FeCl3·6H2O (5.8 g, 0.02 mol) and CoCl2 (1.3 g, 0.01 mol) were dissolved in 100 mL of deionized water at 80 °C under N2 atmosphere and vigorous stirring. Then, 10 mL of 25% NH4OH was quickly injected into the reaction mixture in one portion. The addition of the base to the Co2+/Fe3+ salt solution results in immediate formation of a black precipitate of magnetic NPs (MNPs). The reaction was continued for another 60 min and the mixture was cooled to room temperature. The black precipitate was washed with doubly warm distilled water and dried in vacuum overnight.
General procedure for synthesis of β-enaminones
CoFe2O4 MNPs (0.01 g) were added to a mixture of 1,3-diketone (1 mmol) and amine (1 mmol) at 80 °C and stirred in an oil bath for an appropriate time under solvent-free conditions. After the completion of the reaction (monitored by thin-layer chromatography), the product was extracted with hot ethanol (3 mL), catalyst was separated by an external magnet, washed several times with water and ethanol, and dried under vacuum at room temperature, to prepare for a later run.
Results and discussion
Characterization of the catalyst
In continuation of our previous work [38, 39], we report the use of CoFe2O4 as a heterogeneous nanocatalyst, with high efficiency for the synthesis of β-enaminones. Cobalt ferrite is prepared and characterized via FT-IR, VSM, energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX), SEM, thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), and XRD analyses.
FT-IR spectroscopy
Among FT-IR peaks of CoFe2O4, the strong absorption at 597.54 cm−1 corresponds to the M–O tetrahedral site of the spinel structure and shows the basic nature of the NPs (Fig. 1). The broad bands at 3405.11 and 1628.29 cm−1 are attributed to the hydroxyl groups stretching and bending vibrations of water, respectively.
X-ray diffraction
According to International Center for Diffraction Data PDF cards 3-864 and 22-1086, CoFe2O4 NPs have a cubic structure (Fig. 2) [40, 41]. The powder XRD pattern in the high-angle region of 5 ≤ 2θ ≤ 80 for the sample of CoFe2O4 shows six different peaks at 2θ about 35.1°, 41.4°, 50.9°, 63.5°, 67.5°, and 74.4° marked by their indices (220), (311), (400), (422), (511), and (440), respectively. The sharp peaks and the lack of additional peaks confirm the purity and the good crystallinity of the prepared nanocatalyst.
EDX analyses
The chemical composition of the product is further examined using EDX, which reveals Co and Fe elemental distributions in CoFe2O4 (Fig. 3).
SEM
The size and morphology of CoFe2O4 NPs are estimated via SEM (Fig. 4). Uniformly dispersed spherical particles are observed, along with weak agglomerations. The obtained histogram of the SEM image shows a narrow maximum particle size distribution in the range of 10–30 nm.
VSM
The magnetic features of the catalyst, which accounts for its easy recovery, is confirmed using a VSM in the range from +1 to −1 T. Room temperature-specific magnetization (M) versus applied magnetic field (H) curve measurements of the sample indicate a saturation magnetization value (Ms) of 17 emu g−1 (Fig. 5).
Thermal analyses
TGA/differential thermal analyses (TGA/DTA) of CoFe2O4 NPs are recorded over a temperature range of room temperature to 900 °C at rate of 10 °C min−1 (Fig. 6). The thermogram shows an initial weight loss at 100 °C due to water desorption. The slight weight loss below 350 °C may be due to dehydration of water or loss of hydroxyl groups present on the surface of the spinel structure; no further mass loss is detected up to 800 °C, which indicates the thermal stability of the catalyst [42, 43].
Catalytic activity
After characterization of CoFe2O4, its activity was probed as a heterogeneous catalyst in the preparation of β-enaminones. To access the optimum conditions, we employed model reaction of acetyl acetone (1 mmol), and benzylamine (1 mmol) over various amounts of the nanocatalyst under solvent-free conditions at various temperatures (Table 1). Firstly, the effect of temperature was examined with constant amounts of the catalyst. The yield of the desired enaminones rose at higher temperatures, requiring shorter reaction times. It is noticed that the temperature plays a crucial role in the present system. A decrease in temperature results in reduced yield with traces of the product at room temperature. In order to find the effectiveness of the catalyst, the model reaction is studied with different amounts of the catalyst (5, 10, 15 mg) at various times in solvent-free conditions. The best result is obtained when the reaction reaches 96% conversion in 3 h with 10 mg of the catalyst. Increasing the amount of the catalyst from 10 to 15 mg does not significantly affect the yield of the product formed. In the absence of the catalyst, no improvement of the product yield is observed at temperatures > 80 °C. Also, to distinguish between the roles of homogeneous versus that of heterogeneous catalysts, the reactions were run under similar conditions with comparable amounts of Co2+, Fe3+, and CoFe2O4 NPs, giving product yields of 77, 86, and 96%, respectively (Table 1).
Using these optimized reaction conditions, we extended the scope and efficiency of this protocol by reaction of substituted aromatic and aliphatic amines, with cyclic/acyclic 1,3-diketone (Table 2). Substituents present (electron withdrawing or electron donating) on the aromatic rings of the amines do not significantly affect the yield of the desired products. As the results indicate, this procedure is uniformly effective for both aliphatic and aromatic amines. For practical applications, diamines are used as nucleophiles to obtain bis-(β-enaminones) and bis-(β-enamino esters; Table 2q, y, z).
Following our plausible mechanism, CoFe2O4 NPs appears to act as a Lewis acid by increasing the electrophilicity of the carbonyl groups of diketones, giving I. The amine's nucleophilic attack on the activated carbonyl group of I leads to intermediate II. Subsequent loss of water from III affords imine IV, which may render V through tautomerisation (Scheme 3).
Upon completion of the reactions, potential catalyst recycling was probed using the model reaction under described reaction conditions. After completion of the reaction, the catalyst was readily separated by an external magnet and washed with ethanol. It was dried under vacuum and reused directly in the next cycle where no significant loss of its activity was observed (Fig. 7).
In order to investigate the efficiency of this procedure in comparison with known methods reported in the literature, the activity of CoFe2O4 NPs was probed against others in catalytic synthesis of (Z)-4-(phenylamino)pent-3-en-2-one (Table 3).
Conclusion
In continuation of our attempts to make important synthons for biological compounds, a heterogeneous nanocatalyst, CoFe2O4 NPs, was fabricated and fully characterized. Subsequently, it was employed in an efficient, one-pot, solvent-free preparation of a number β-enaminone derivatives with minimal side-products (86–97%). Specifically, this achievement was reached through treatment of substituted aromatic and aliphatic amines with cyclic/acyclic 1,3-diketones over the magnetically separable CoFe2O4 NPs. Other than high yields, the nanocatalyst offers several promising advantages, including short reaction time, easy handling, simple work up procedure, product purity, ease of separation, and recyclability of the catalyst. A control test involving comparable amounts of Co2+, Fe3+, and CoFe2O4 NPs under similar conditions clearly indicated higher efficiency of the latter heterogeneous nanocatalyst over the former homogeneous ions. The magnetic properties of CoFe2O4 NPs help easy separation from the reaction mixture. The introduced magnetically stable nanocatalyst could be reused in five successive runs with no significant structural change or loss of activity.
References
I. Beletskaya, V. Tyurin, Molecules 15, 4792 (2010)
N. Toshima, T. Yonezawa, New J. Chem. 22, 1179 (1998)
F.M. Moghaddam, G. Tavakoli, A. Moafi, V. Saberi, H.R. Rezvani, ChemCatChem 6, 3474 (2014)
S. Sun, H. Zeng, D.B. Robinson, S. Raoux, P.M. Rice, S.X. Wang, G. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 273 (2004)
U. Kurtan, R. Topkaya, A. Baykal, M.S. Toprak, Ceram. Int. 39, 6551 (2013)
Z. Zi, Y. Sun, X. Zhu, Z. Yang, J. Dai, W. Song, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321, 1251 (2009)
M. Rajendran, R.C. Pullar, A.K. Bhattacharya, D. Das, S.N. Chintalapudi, C.K. Majumdar, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 232, 71 (2001)
M. Dong, Q. Lin, D. Chen, X. Fu, M. Wang, Q. Wu, X. Chen, S. Li, RSC Adv. 3, 11628 (2013)
L. Menini, M.C. Pereira, A.C. Ferreira, J.D. Fabris, E.V. Gusevskaya, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 392, 151 (2011)
R.A. Bohara, N.D. Thorat, H.M. Yadav, S.H. Pawar, New J. Chem. 38, 2979 (2014)
D. Potin, F. Dumas, J. D’Angelo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 3483 (1990)
C. Cimarelli, G. Palmieri, J. Org. Chem. 61, 5557 (1996)
G. Bartoli, C. Cimarelli, E. Marcantoni, G. Palmieri, M. Petrini, J. Org. Chem. 59, 5328 (1994)
K.V. Tarasenko, O.V. Manoylenko, V.P. Kukhar, G.V. Röschenthaler, I.I. Gerus, Tetrahedron Lett. 51, 4623 (2010)
G. Li, K. Watson, R.W. Buckheit, Y. Zhang, Org. Lett. 9, 2043 (2007)
B.A.D. Neto, A.A.M. Lapis, A.B. Bernd, D. Russowsky, Tetrahedron 65, 2484 (2009)
L.J.O. Figueiredo, C. Kascheres, J. Org. Chem. 62, 1164 (1997)
T. Mahmud, R. Rehman, A. Gulzar, A. Khalid, J. Anwar, U. Shafique, Waheed-uz-Zaman, M. Salman, Arab. J. Chem. 3, 219 (2010)
A.M. Farag, A.S. Mayhoub, S.E. Barakat, A.H. Bayomi, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 16, 881 (2008)
I.O. Edafiogho, K.V.V. Ananthalakshmi, S.B. Kombian, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 14, 5266 (2006)
N.N. Salama, K.R. Scott, N.D. Eddington, Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 25, 227 (2004)
I.O. Edafiogho, O.A. Phillips, E.E. Udo, S. Samuel, B. Rethish, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 44, 967 (2009)
A.Z. El-Hashim, I.O. Edafiogho, S.M. Jaffal, M.H. Yousif, C.I. Ezeamuzie, S.B. Kombian, Life Sci. 89, 378 (2011)
A. El-Hashim, S. Yousefi, I. Edafiogho, R. Raghupathy, M. Yousif, H.U. Simon, Eur. J. Pharmacol. 632, 73 (2010)
A.C. Spivey, R. Srikaran, C.M. Diaper, D.J. Turner, Org. Biomol. Chem. 1, 1638 (2003)
Z.H. Zhang, T.S. Li, J.J. Li, Catal. Commun. 8, 1615 (2007)
A. Arcadi, G. Bianchi, S. Di Giuseppe, F. Marinelli, Green Chem. 5, 64 (2003)
K.D. Bhatte, P.J. Tambade, K.P. Dhake, B.M. Bhanage, Catal. Commun. 11, 1233 (2010)
M. Kidwai, S. Bhardwaj, N.K. Mishra, V. Bansal, A. Kumar, S. Mozumdar, Catal. Commun. 10, 1514 (2009)
G. Bartoli, M. Bosco, M. Locatelli, E. Marcantoni, P. Melchiorre, and L. Sambri, Synlett 239 (2004)
R.K. Vohra, J.-L. Renaud, C. Bruneau, Collect. Czechoslov. Chem. Commun. 70, 1943 (2005)
M.M. Khodaei, A.R. Khosropour, and M. Kookhazadeh, Synlett 1980 (2004)
J. Lin, L.F. Zhang, Monatshefte Fur Chemie 138, 77 (2007)
A.R. Gholap, N.S. Chakor, T. Daniel, R.J. Lahoti, K.V. Srinivasan, J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 245, 37 (2006)
H. Eshghi, S.M. Seyedi, E. Safaei, M. Vakili, A. Farhadipour, M. Bayat-Mokhtari, J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 363–364, 430 (2012)
L. Rout, A. Kumar, R.S. Dhaka, P. Dash, RSC Adv. 6, 49923 (2016)
D. Deng, L. Xiao, I.M. Chung, I.S. Kim, M. Gopiraman, A.C.S. Sustain, Chem. Eng. 5, 1253 (2017)
E. Eidi, M.Z. Kassaee, RSC Adv. 6, 106873 (2016)
E. Eidi, M.Z. Kassaee, Z. Nasresfahani, Appl. Organomet. Chem. 30, 561 (2016)
X. Cao, L. Gu, Nanotechnology 16, 180 (2005)
T. Hyeon, Y. Chung, J. Park, S. Lee, Y.-W. Kim, B.H. Park, J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 6831 (2002)
J.K. Rajput, G. Kaur, Chin. J. Catal. 34, 1697 (2013)
P. Sivakumar, R. Ramesh, A. Ramanand, S. Ponnusamy, C. Muthamizhchelvan, Mater. Res. Bull. 46, 2204 (2011)
R. Khajuria, A. Ambica, Y. Saini, K.K. Kapoor, Indian J. Chem. Sect. B Org Med. Chem. 53, 1122 (2014)
A.L. Gajengi, T. Sasaki, B.M. Bhanage, RSC Adv. 6, 101800 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eidi, E., Kassaee, M.Z. & Cummings, P.T. β-Enaminones over recyclable nano-CoFe2O4: a highly efficient solvent-free green protocol. Res Chem Intermed 44, 5787–5799 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-018-3454-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-018-3454-5