Introduction

The Michael addition [1] is the 1,4-addition of a resonance stabilized carbanion to an activated olefins. This is the one of the most powerful methods in organic synthesis for C–C and C–X (X=O, N,S) bond formation. In the case of obtaining a Michael adduct enantioselectively, organocatalytic asymmetric synthesis has been recognized as an important candidate, as a result of the explosive growth of organocatalysis in the past decades [25]. Asymmetric Michael addition of chalcones by various nucleophiles using organocatalysts has been well reported in recent years and the Michael adducts obtained were used as valuable intermediates for further reactions. Here, in this review article we have discussed Michael-addition of various nucleophiles such as nitro alkane, malonate, cyanoacetate, hydroxyamine, malononitrile, thiol, cyanomethylphosphate, butenolide, coumarin, 1-fluoro-1-nitro(phenylsulfonyl)methane to chalcones using a variety of catalysts such as cinchona-based, and bifunctional organocatalysts covering from the year 2011–2014 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Organocatalyst 118 used for various Michael addition to chalcones

Organocatalytic Michael addition

Michael addition of γ-butyrolactam to chalcone

In 2011 Wang et al. [6] disclosed the enantioselective vinylogous Michael addition of α,β-unsaturated γ-butyrolactam 19 to α,β-unsaturated carbonyl 20 catalysed by bifunctional thiourea-tertiary amine catalyst 1 affording the γ-substituted butyrolactam 21 with high diastereo- and enantioselectivity. Interestingly, no acidic co-catalyst was required in this reaction, and excellent results in terms of yield and selectivity were obtained. However, when R was an aliphatic moiety, the reaction did not occur due to low reactivity of the enone substrate. The proposed transition state is more favorable for the stereoselective outcome of 21. The carbonyl group of the chalcone 20 was activated by the N–H proton of ammonium through a hydrogen bond and the thiourea coordinated to 19. The Si-face attack provided the desired product (5R, 6R)-21 (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Enantioselective direct vinylogous Michael addition of α,β-Unsaturated γ-Butyrolactam 19 to Chalcones 20 catalysed by 1

Chen et al. [7] and Ye et al. [8] reported previously organocatalytic asymmetric vinylogous Michael addition of α,β-unsaturated γ-butyrolactams to α,β-unsaturated aldehydes as well as enones. Since the alkaline earth metal has been well recognized for its vast abundance and being inexpensive as well as relatively nontoxic compared to transition metals, Wang and co-workers [9] reported the asymmetric vinylogous Michael additions of α,β-unsaturated γ-butyrolactam 19 to chalcones 22 in combination with a chiral bifunctional 3,3′-Ph2-BINOL-Mg catalyst, which furnished the products 23 with exceptional diastereo- and enantioselectivity (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2
scheme 2

Enantioselective direct vinylogous Michael addition of α,β-Unsaturated γ-Butyrolactam 19 to α,β- unsaturated carbonyl 22 catalysed by 2

Michael addition of cyclic ketone to chalcone

Wang and Zhou [10] established the conjugate addition of cyclopentanone 24 to chalcone 25 catalysed by a chiral bifunctional thiophosphoramide catalyst 3 (Scheme 3). Using 20 mol % of catalyst, the reaction of different chalcones proceeded smoothly to afford the corresponding adducts 26 with moderate to excellent diastereo- and enantioselectivities. Unsubstituted chalcone gave the conjugate addition product with a high level of enantioselectivity (92 % ee). The introduction of a substituent on either Ar or Ar1 led to the decrease in enantioselectivity, affording the desired product with only moderate ee values (ranging from 58 to 71 % ee for the major diastereomer). Although the electronic nature of the substituents on Ar1 in the chalcones did not influence the enantioselectivity, the diastereoselectivity of the reaction was significantly influenced by the nature of the substituent on Ar1. Generally an electron donating group is favourable for anti-selectivity of the reaction, while the introduction of an electron withdrawing group on Ar1 resulted in a marked decrease in diastereoselectivity (Scheme 3). In the transition state 3 behaves as a bifunctional catalyst. The pyrrolidine ring of 3 first reacts with cyclopentanone to form an enamine with the aid of benzoic acid. Subsequently, the acidic hydrogen activated and orientated the carbonyl group of chalcones 25 through a hydrogen-bonding interaction so that the enamine will undertake preferentially a nucleophilic attack from its Re-face onto the Re-face of the chalcones to give the (S,S)-product as the major stereoisomer.

Scheme 3
scheme 3

Asymmetric Michael addition of cyclopentanone 24 to chalcones 25

Wang et al. reported [11] that the asymmetric Michael addition of cyclic ketones 27 to chalcones 28 using a C2-Symmetric proline derived tetraamine 4 catalyst provided Michael adduct 29 in good yields with high levels of diastereo- and enantioselectivities under mild conditions (Scheme 4). The stereochemical outcome was explained from the transition state of Scheme 4. Protonated catalyst 4 first forms a chiral enamine with ketones 27, and then a Michael reaction between the activated enamine and the chalcones 28 in the Si-face approach leads to the formation of the corresponding products 29.

Scheme 4
scheme 4

Michael addition of cyclic ketones 27 to chalcones 28

To induce the potential catalytic activity, Li et al. [12] introduced pyrrolidine-based 1,8-Naphthalimide catalyst 5 for asymmetric Michael addition reaction of cyclic ketones 30 to chalcones 31. Moderate to excellent diastereoselectivities and enatioselectivities were obtained for this catalyst system 5. The presence of a Bronsted acid with proper acidity, such as benzoic acid was shown to be critical for the excellent performance of this catalyst system. Reactions with six-membered ring ketones gave the Michael adducts with excellent enantioselectivities (92–94 % ee). But when cyclopentanone, cycloheptanone, and acetone were used as substrate, only reasonable enatioselectivity was obtained. The stereochemical outcome was well determined from the transition state (Scheme 5). The catalyst 5 first forms enamine by reaction with 30 in the presence of Bronsted acid (benzoic acid), in which the imide carbonyl oxygen atom plays an important role in shielding the Si-face of the enamine double bond and activating the chalcones 31.

Scheme 5
scheme 5

Catalytic asymmetric Michael addition of cyclohexanone 30 to chalcones 31

In 2013, Li et al. [13] disclosed the organophosphane catalysed direct Michael addition of cyclicketones to various weakly active chalcone acceptors. The reaction was catalysed by 6, giving rise to corresponding adducts with good yields and high diastereo- and enantio-selectivities. In marked contrast, insertion of an electron-withdrawing group on Ar2 of chalcones favored an increased yield whereas an electron-donating group resulted in a significant decrease in yield. Both cyclohexanone and cyclopentanone reacted efficiently with various chalcones in the presence of this catalyst. The diastereoselectivities of Michael addition between cyclopentanone and chalcones are lower than the Michael addition of the cyclohexanone with chalcones. This is due to the ring strain in the five membered ring. Mechanistically the cyclic ketones 33 would be activated and form the enamine intermediates A with organocatalyst 6. Simultaneously, the chalcones 34 would associate with the organocatalyst to form the intermediates B through electrostatic interaction between the polarized P=O bond and the chalcone carbonyl oxygen atoms. The enamines would further attack the activated chalcone carbon–carbon double bonds via an intermediate C to give the final products 35 and 36, simultaneously releasing the organocatalyst 6 (Schemes 6, 7).

Scheme 6
scheme 6

Asymmetric Michael addition of cyclic ketones 33 to chalcones 34 catalyzed by an organophosphane based on proline 6

Scheme 7
scheme 7

Catalytic cycle and the proposed mechanism for Michael addition catalyzed by organocatalyst 6

The asymmetric addition of simple cyclic ketones with chalcones catalyzed by organocatalysts remains a synthetic challenge probably due to the low reactivity and high steric hindrance of the substrates. To overcome this synthetic challenge, Li and his co-workers [12] in 2012 utilised a pyrrolidine-based imides catalysis mode to establish the asymmetric Michael addition reaction of cyclic ketones to chalcones. The same group [14] in 2014 discovered a related process using benzoylthiourea–pyrrolidine catalyst 7, with benzoic acid as the additive, affording the desired products 38 with excellent yields and high diastereo- and good enantioselectivities. The nature of the substituent on the benzene ring exhibited a slight influence on the reaction rate and yield, when an electron donating substituent was present in the benzene ring, low yield was obtained. The stereochemical outcome was explained by the tentative transition state of Scheme 8. In the transition state, catalyst 7 act as a bifunctional catalyst. The pyrrolidine reacted with carbonyl compounds 30 to form an enamine and the benzoylthiourea activated to the chalcones 37 via N–H hydrogen bonds. The enamine attacked the chalcones from the Si-face to afford the product 38 (Scheme 8).

Scheme 8
scheme 8

Catalytic asymmetric Michael addition of cyclohexanone 30 to chalcones 37 by using organocatalyst 7

Michael addition of 1-fluoro-1-nitro (phenylsulfonyl)methane to chalcones

Kim et al. [15] in 2012 developed a highly enantioselective catalytic conjugate addition reaction of 1-fluoro-1-nitro (phenylsulfonyl) methane FNSM 39 to chalcones 40 derivatives using a binaphthyl-derived tertiary amine-thiourea organocatalyst 8 (Scheme 9). Maximum yield and enantioselectivities (94 % yield, 98 % ee) were obtained (Ar1 = Ph, Ar2 = 4-CF3Ph) when toluene was used as solvent, and the reaction was carried out at −30 °C. The stereochemical outcome and reaction rate were proposed from the tentative transition state of Scheme 9. The carbonyl group of the chalcone 40 is activated by the thiourea moiety of catalyst 8 through hydrogen bonding, and the FNSM (39) is activated by the basic nitrogen atom in tertiary amine resulting in the stereochemical outcome of 41.

Scheme 9
scheme 9

Catalytic asymmetric Michael addition of 1-fluoro-1-nitro(phenylsulfonyl)methane 39 to chalcones 40 catalyzed by binaphthyl-derived organocatalyst 8

Michael addition of 5H-oxazol-4-ones to chalcone

Ye et al. [16] reported the successful effective diastereoselective and enantioselective Michael addition of 5H-oxazol-4-ones 42 to α,β-unsaturated ketones 43 catalyzed by a L-tertleucine derived chiral thiourea–tertiary amine organocatalyst 9. With a catalyst loading of 10 mol%, the Michael adduct 44 obtained high yields with good diastereoselectivities and enantioselectivities (Scheme 10). In the case of chalcones, the reaction proceeded very well with perfect stereoselectivity and only a single isomer (>30:1 dr and >99 % ee) was obtained whereas the reactions of aliphatic α,β-unsaturated ketone showed a slightly low reaction rate.

Scheme 10
scheme 10

Direct Michael addition of various 5H-oxazol-4-ones 42 and α,β-unsaturated ketones 43 using organocatalyst 9

Michael addition of rhodanine to chalcone

The same group also extended this approach by introducing chiral primary amine catalyst and applied in the direct diastereo and enantioselective Michael addition of substituted rhodanines to α,β-unsaturated ketones. In the presence of catalyst 10, chalcone underwent this reaction smoothly, affording the desired products 47 in good yields and high enantioselectivities with excellent diastereoselectivities (Scheme 11) [17].

Scheme 11
scheme 11

Direct Michael reaction of rhodanine 45 to α,β unsaturated ketones 46

Michael addition of malononitrile to chalcone

In the pioneering investigation done by Du et al. [18] in 2012, there was reported a highly enantioselective Michael addition of malononitrile 48 to chalcones 49 by a chiral quinine-derived squaramide 11 (0.5 mol%) catalyst under mild reaction conditions resulting in the synthesis of 50 in high yield and good enantiomeric excesses. A possible transition-state model for the catalytic reaction of chalcone 49 and malononitrile 48 is hypothesized and shown in Scheme 12. The chiral squaramide 11 may act as a bifunctional catalyst. Malononitrile 48 is deprotonated by the basic nitrogen atom of the tertiary amine. Meanwhile, the squaramide moiety as a Bronsted acid activates chalcone 49 through double hydrogen bonding. The deprotonated malononitrile attacks the activated chalcone from the Re-face to afford the S-configured product 50.

Scheme 12
scheme 12

Asymmetric Michael addition of malononitrile 48 to chalcones 49

Michael addition of glycine imine ester to chalcones

Hii et al. [19] in 2013 independently reported an efficient asymmetric Michael addition of glycine imine ester 51 to chalcones 52 by utilizing 2-oxopyrimidinium salt 12 as catalyst. The reaction proceeded in high yields with high enantioselectivity (Scheme 13). Although the catalyst contains only planar nitrogen moieties, they are entirely devoid of Bronsted basicity. This reaction has a greater scope for base labile moieties.

Scheme 13
scheme 13

Conjugate addition of 51 to a chalcone derivatives 52

Michael addition of coumarin to chalcones

In 2011 Wang et al. [20] reported the highly asymmetric Michael addition of α,β-unsaturated ketones 55 to 4-hydroxycoumarin 54 catalysed by chiral primary amine thiourea bifunctional catalyst 13 affording 56 in high yields with excellent enantioselectivities (Scheme 14).

Scheme 14
scheme 14

Asymmetric Michael addition of α,β-unsaturated ketone 55 to 4-hydroxycoumarin 54

In 2012, Du et al. [21] demonstrated that employing 4-hydroxycoumarin 54 to α,β-unsaturated ketone 57 catalyzed by primary amine–phosphinamide bifunctional catalysts 14 led to the formation of corresponding Warfarin analogues 58 with moderate to excellent yields and good to excellent enantioselectivities under mild conditions. According to the absolute configuration of Warfarin analogues 58, a possible transition state model was proposed (Scheme 15). An iminium ion intermediate was formed by reaction with the primary amine of the catalyst 14 and the unsaturated enone. The 4-hydroxycoumarin was activated through hydrogen bonding interaction with the P=O group. The P=O group was also working as a Lewis base for deprotonation of acidic hydrogen, and enhancing the nucleophilic ability of 4-hydroxycoumarin 54. (R)-Warfarin analogue 58 was obtained through the attack of 4-hydroxycoumarin to the Re-face of the iminium ion.

Scheme 15
scheme 15

Conjugate addition of 4-hydroxycoumarin 54 to α,β-unsaturated ketone 57 using organocatalyst 14

Sabir et al. [22] in 2013 reported a Michael addition reaction between substituted α,β-unsaturated ketones 59 and 4-hydroxy coumarin 54 by proline derived organocatalyt 15. The yield of the Michael adduct 60 was improved by the variation of mol% of catalysts and solvents. The maximum yield was obtained for 20 mol% 15 in DCM while TFA was used as a co-catalyst. Maximum yield of products were obtained when methyl and phenyl groups were selected as the substituents on α, β-unsaturated ketones (Scheme 16).

Scheme 16
scheme 16

Conjugate addition of Coumarin 54 to the chalcone derivatives 59

Michael addition of phthalides to chalcones

Lu and co-workers [23] established the asymmetric conjugate addition of phthalides 61 to chalcones 62 catalysed by a chiral bifunctional amine-thiourea catalyst 16. The reaction resulted in a single diastereomeric Michael adduct 63 and with excellent yield and enantioselectivities (Scheme 17).

Scheme 17
scheme 17

Direct asymmetric Michael addition of phthalide derivatives 61 to chalcones 62

In 2013, Huang and Wang et al. [24] reported the aza-Michael addition reactions of nitrophthalimide 64 to α,β-unsaturated ketones 65 using catalyst 9-epi-9-amino-9-deoxyquinine 17. The reaction provided the corresponding adducts 66 with moderate to high yields and up to high enantioselectivities. In the proposed transition state (Scheme 18), 64 bind to the basic group of the catalyst 17 through hydrogen-bonding interactions (N–H–N) more easily, activating the nitrogen nucleophile for nucleophilic attack in the Si-face of the activated α,β-unsaturated ketone, resulting in high enantioselectivity of the reaction.

Scheme 18
scheme 18

Asymmetric organocatalytic aza-Michael addition reactions of 4-nitrophthalimide 64 to α,β-unsaturated ketones 65

Michael addition of diethyl malonate to chalcones

Various alkaloids based on cinchona have been used for the enantioselective Michael addition. In 2014, He and co-workers [25] reported the enantioselective Michael addition of diethyl malonate 67 to chalcones 68 utilising a bifunctional tertiary amine-thioureas catalyst 18 bearing multiple hydrogen-bonding donors. A variety of substituted chalcones were used to provide the addition products R (-) 69 in high yields and with high to excellent enantioselectivities. The stereochemical outcome was explained by the plausible transition state (TS) models for the Michael reactions of chalcones 68 and diethyl malonate 67 catalyzed by 18 (Scheme 19). In the transition state, the carbonyl group of chalcone is activated by the multiple hydrogen bonding interactions between the oxygen atom of the carbonyl with the thiourea moiety and the extra hydroxyl group of 18. Meanwhile, diethyl malonate 67 is deprotonated by the basic nitrogen atom of the quinuclidine in cinchona alkaloid moiety.

Scheme 19
scheme 19

The asymmetric Michael reaction of diethyl malonate 67 to chalcones 68 catalyzed by catalyst 18

Michael addition of pyrazole to chalcones

In 2014, Li and Wang et al. [26] demonstrated that employing pyrazole 70 as nitrogen nucleophiles for additions to chalcones 71 catalyzed by 17 led to the formation of 1,4-adducts 72 in moderate to good yields and excellent asymmetry induction. Variation of the solvents had a pronounced effect on the yields and enantioselectivities. The reaction was studied with Et2O and 1,4-dioxane (Scheme 20).

Scheme 20
scheme 20

Aza-Michael addition of pyrazole 70 to chalcones 71 using catalyst 17

Conclusion

In this review, we have summarized significant works regarding Michael addition reactions of various nucleophiles to chalcones using different organocatalysts. The Michael addition involves a wide range of nucleophiles as Michael donors and chalcones act as Michael acceptors. Future work would be the utilization of these powerful strategies for the efficient assembly of biologically interesting molecules including natural and unnatural products. Finally, creative combination of new catalysts and new reaction sequences will further broaden the scope and applicability of chalcones as Michael acceptors in Michael addition reactions for the efficient synthesis of biologically interesting molecules.