Abstract
Ramanujan in his notebook recorded two modular equations involving multipliers with moduli of degrees (1,7) and (1,23). In this paper, we find some new Ramanujan-type modular equations involving multipliers with moduli of degrees (3,5) and (1,15), and give concise proofs by employing Ramanujan’s multiplier functional equation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Ramanujan defined modular equations as follows: Suppose that
holds for some positive integer n or positive rational fraction \(n=i/j\) (i and j are coprime). The relation between \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) induced by the above equation is called a modular equation of degree n, and we say that \(\beta \) over \(\alpha \) is of degree n. Let
The multiplier m of the modular equation is defined by
Before proceeding to the main theta function identity of this paper, we shall first recall certain known theta function identities which we need in the sequel. Throughout the paper, we assume \(|q|<1\). The following is the well-known Jacobi triple product identity:
The two particular facts of f(a, b) (See [1], Entry 22, p. 36), are as follows
Let the base q in the classical theory of elliptic functions be defined by
We have the following well-known identities (See [1], Entry 10 and 11, pp. 122–123)
and
and
Ramanujan found and recorded the following modular equations involving multipliers with moduli of degrees 7 and 23, in the case degree \((n \bmod 8)=7\), respectively.
Theorem 1
(See [1], Entry 19, pp. 314–315) If \(\beta \) has degree 7 over \(\alpha \), and m is the multiplier for degree 7, then
and
and Ramanujan’s theta functions form is
The Eq. (11) has been proved by B. C. Berndt using the method of parametrization. Recently, K. R. Vasuki and R. G. Veeresha [2] have given the proof of the equivalent representation (12) by the theta function identity for degree 7.
Theorem 2
(See [1], Entry 15, p. 411) If \(\beta \) is of the 23 degree over \(\alpha \), and m is the multiplier for same degree, then
and
Berndt finished the proof of (14) by the theory of modular forms (See [1], Entry 15, pp. 415–416). Similarly, in this paper, we also find some new Ramanujan-type modular equations involving multipliers with moduli of degrees (3,5) and (1,15).
2 Some new Ramanujan-type modular equations of degrees 15 and \(\frac{5}{3}\)
The beautiful Ramanujan-type modular equations of degrees 15 and \(\frac{5}{3}\) (See [1], Entry 21, p. 435): Let \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) have degrees \((n_1,n_2)=(3,5)\); or (1, 15), respectively. Then
where the minus sign is chosen in the first case and the plus sign is selected in the last case.
For modular equations in the form of Russell, we redefine (See [3], Entry 21, p. 435),
If \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) have degrees \((n_1,n_2)=(1, 15)\) (See [3], Entry 21, p. 435), then
and, if \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) have degrees \((n_1,n_2)=(3, 5)\),
We can verify that these two modular equations (17) and (18) are equivalent formulations of (15).
Theorem 3
(new modular equations for degrees \((n_1,n_2)=(1, 15)\)) Let \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) have degrees \((n_1,n_2)=(1, 15)\), and \(m=\frac{z_1}{z_{15}}\) is the multiplier for degree \(n=15\). Then
-
1.
The natural form
$$\begin{aligned} m-\frac{15}{m}= & {} 2 \left( (\alpha \beta )^{1 / 8}-\{(1-\alpha )(1-\beta )\}^{1 / 8}\right) \nonumber \\{} & {} \times \left[ 1+3\left( (\alpha \beta )^{1 / 8}+\{(1-\alpha )(1-\beta )\}^{1 / 8}\right) \right. \nonumber \\{} & {} +\, 3\left( (\alpha \beta )^{1 / 4}+\{(1-\alpha )(1-\beta )\}^{1 / 4}\right) +2 (\alpha \beta (1-\alpha )(1-\beta ))^{1 / 8}\nonumber \\{} & {} \left. \times \left( 3+(\alpha \beta )^{1 / 8}+\{(1-\alpha )(1-\beta )\}^{1 / 8}\right) \right] , \end{aligned}$$(19) -
2.
The emphatic form
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned}&m-\frac{15}{m} =2 \left( (\alpha \beta )^{1 / 4}-\{(1-\alpha )(1-\beta )\}^{1 / 4}\right) \\&\quad \times \left[ 4\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(1+\sqrt{\alpha \beta }+\sqrt{(1-\alpha )(1-\beta )})}+4-\left( (\alpha \beta )^{1 / 4}+\{(1-\alpha )(1-\beta )\}^{1 / 4}\right) \right] , \end{aligned}\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$(20) -
3.
Ramanujan’s theta functions form:
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} \frac{\varphi ^2(q)}{\varphi ^2(q^{15})}-15 \frac{\varphi ^2(q^{15})}{\varphi ^2(q)}&=2 \left( 4 \frac{q^4\psi (q^2) \psi (q^{30})}{\varphi (q)\varphi (q^{15})}-\frac{\varphi (-q)\varphi (-q^{15})}{\varphi (q)\varphi (q^{15})}\right) \\&\quad \times \left[ 4\left( \frac{\varphi (q^2) \varphi (q^{30})}{\varphi (q) \varphi \left( q^{15}\right) }+4 \frac{q^8 \psi (q^4) \psi (q^{60})}{\varphi (q) \varphi \left( q^{15}\right) }\right) \right. \\&\quad \left. +4-\left( 4 \frac{q^4\psi (q^2) \psi (q^{30})}{\varphi (q)\varphi (q^{15})}+\frac{\varphi (-q)\varphi (-q^{15})}{\varphi (q)\varphi (q^{15})}\right) \right] . \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(21)
Proof
(i). According to Ramanujan’s multiplier function equation (See [1], Entry 24(vi), p. 217), we can write
Let
and employing the technique adopted in the proof of modular equation of degree 7 by Berndt ([1], p316–319), one can deduce that
and using the Eqs. (22)–(24), we deduce
and
Again, from the Eq. (17), we have the equivalent modular equation of degree 15 in the form of x and y, it reads
From the Eqs. (19) and (23), we also have
Now set
using the Eq. (27), we obtain
Solving the above equation for \(\varrho \) and noticing that \(x<y\), we get
Employing (31) and (24) in (26) with \(n=15\), we deduce
and employing (31) in (28), we obtain
We can verify that these two Eqs. (32) and (33) are equivalent. So far, we employed the method of parameterization to prove the modular equation of degree 15 which involves the multiplier m. \(\square \)
Proof
(ii). Substituting (27) into (28), we obtain
By using the Eq. (15), we can write
Substituting (34) and (35) into (28), we arrive at
which completes the proof. \(\square \)
Proof
(iii). If \(\beta \) over \(\alpha \) is degree 15, we employ the identity (See [1], p. 433 eq. (20.6))
and translate this identity in form of Ramanujan’s theta functions (See [1], Entry 10 and 11, pp. 122–123)
and use (8), we get
Substituting (38) and (39) into (20), we completes the proof. \(\square \)
Theorem 4
(New modular equations for degrees \((n_1,n_2)=(3, 5)\)) Let \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) have degrees \((n_1,n_2)=(3, 5)\), and \(m=\frac{z_3}{z_{5}}\) is the multiplier for degree \(n=\frac{5}{3}\). Then
-
1.
The natural form
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} m-\frac{5}{3m}&=\frac{2}{3} \left( (\alpha \beta )^{1 / 8}-\{(1-\alpha )(1-\beta )\}^{1 / 8}\right) \\&\quad \times \left[ 1-3\left( (\alpha \beta )^{1 / 8}+\{(1-\alpha )(1-\beta )\}^{1 / 8}\right) \right. \\&\quad +3\left( (\alpha \beta )^{1 / 4}+\{(1-\alpha )(1-\beta )\}^{1 / 4}\right) +2 (\alpha \beta (1-\alpha )(1-\beta ))^{1 / 8}\\&\quad \left. \times \left( 3-(\alpha \beta )^{1 / 8}-\{(1-\alpha )(1-\beta )\}^{1 / 8}\right) \right] , \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(40) -
2.
The emphatic form
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned}&m-\frac{5}{3m} =\frac{2}{3} \left( (\alpha \beta )^{1 / 4}-\{(1-\alpha )(1-\beta )\}^{1 / 4}\right) \\&\times \left[ 4\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(1+\sqrt{\alpha \beta }+\sqrt{(1-\alpha )(1-\beta )})}-4+\left( (\alpha \beta )^{1 / 4}+\{(1-\alpha )(1-\beta )\}^{1 / 4}\right) \right] , \end{aligned}\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$(41) -
3.
Ramanujan’s theta functions form
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} \frac{\varphi ^2(q^3)}{\varphi ^2(q^{5})}-\frac{5}{3} \frac{\varphi ^2(q^{5})}{\varphi ^2(q^3)}&=\frac{2}{3} \left( 4\frac{ q^2 \psi (q^6) \psi (q^{10})}{\varphi (q^3) \varphi \left( q^5\right) }-\frac{\varphi (-q^3) \varphi (-q^5)}{\varphi (q^3) \varphi \left( q^5\right) }\right) \\&\quad \times \left[ 4\left( \frac{\varphi (q^6) \varphi (q^{10}))}{\varphi (q^3) \varphi \left( q^5\right) }+4\frac{ q^4 \psi (q^{12})) \psi (q^{20}))}{\varphi (q^3) \varphi \left( q^5\right) }\right) \right. \\&\quad \left. -4+\left( 4\frac{ q^2 \psi (q^6) \psi (q^{10})}{\varphi (q^3) \varphi \left( q^5\right) }+\frac{\varphi (-q^3) \varphi (-q^5)}{\varphi (q^3) \varphi \left( q^5\right) }\right) \right] . \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(42)
The proof of Theorem 4 is similar to the proof of the Theorem 3. Hence we omit the details.
References
Berndt, B.C.: Ramanujan’s Notebooks: Part III. Springer, New York (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0965-2
Vasuki, K.R., Veeresha, R.G.: On Ramanujan’s modular equation of degree 7. J. Number Theory 153, 304–308 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2015.01.002
Berndt, B.C.: Ramanujan’s Notebooks. Part V. Springer, New York (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1624-7
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referee for his helpful comments and invaluable suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CDZ contributed to the conception and proof, LY performed the validation and writing. They reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42174037).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chuan-Ding, Z., Li, Y. Some new Ramanujan-type modular equations of degree 15. Ramanujan J 64, 143–151 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11139-023-00817-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11139-023-00817-y